Financial Times - 09.10.2026.pdf

金融时报 (FINANCIAL TIMES)

2026年10月9日 星期五

深度报道，第21页 曼城裁决对海湾地区意味着什么

英国 3.70 英镑；爱尔兰共和国 4.10 欧元

巴登诺克终于愿意与改革党正面交锋 ROBERT SHRIMSLEY，第23页

俄罗斯袭击巴士造成数十人死亡

昨日，在乌克兰东部城市克拉马托尔斯克，一辆被俄罗斯炸弹击中的公共巴士残骸。

在近几个月针对平民最致命的袭击之一中，两辆巴士在高峰时段被炸弹击中，造成至少 30 人死亡，18 人受伤。当局表示，附近另一起袭击造成另外三人死亡。

“由于伤势严重，部分遇难者仍未被确认身份，”总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基表示，并警告死亡人数可能会上升。

此次巴士站爆炸发生在前一天俄罗斯导弹袭击基辅以东约 150 公里的普里卢基一座公寓楼之后，当时数十名受伤人员被埋在碎片之下。过去一天半内，俄罗斯袭击造成的总死亡人数已上升至至少 64 人。 乌克兰死亡人数 第6页

顿涅茨克地区检察官办公室/AFP via Getty Images

OpenAI 年化营收下调 200 亿美元打击投资者乐观情绪

• 该行业需求的主要指标
• 数据从 700 亿美元下调
• 美国科技股大跌

乔治·哈蒙德 (GEORGE HAMMOND) 和 斯蒂芬·莫里斯 (STEPHEN MORRIS) —— 旧金山

根据与投资者分享的财务文件，OpenAI 的年化营收比该公司此前暗示的低约 200 亿美元，这一巨大差距可能会打击人们对 AI 需求增长的乐观情绪。

该公司最近告诉投资者，截至 9 月底，其年化营收接近 500 亿美元，远低于上月底《金融时报》及其他媒体基于此前向投资者提供的信息所报道的 700 亿美元。

该指标以及其主要竞争对手 Anthropic 的相应数据，是衡量 AI 整体需求最重要的指标，并支撑着庞大的基础设施支出和公开股票市场的增长。

在《金融时报》昨日报道后，美国科技股大幅下跌，延续了早盘的跌势，纳斯达克 100 指数下跌 1.7%。芯片制造商英伟达下跌 2.9%，甲骨文下跌近 6%，美光科技下跌 4%。

这一差异源于 OpenAI 自身的投资者试图将其与 Anthropic 进行直接对比

9月份的 500亿美元 数据仍表明自夏季以来该公司处于快速扩张状态

据一名知情人士透露，年化营收计算方式有所不同。

这两家公司计算该数值的方法不同：Anthropic 将通过亚马逊 AWS 和谷歌云（Google Cloud）等云合作伙伴实现的销售收入计算在内，而 OpenAI 则不计算在内。

该人士表示，投资者试图“总额化”（gross up）OpenAI 的年化营收，这导致此前有报道称该数字在 7 月份约为 400亿美元。

OpenAI 随后告知其支持者，其年化营收自 7 月以来增长了 70% 以上，这引发了关于 9 月底该数字约为 700亿美元 的报道——公司并未否认这一数字。然而，最新的投资者演示文稿显示，7 月份的年化营收接近 300亿美元。

作为一家私有公司，OpenAI 无需定期公开披露其财务状况。OpenAI 拒绝置评。

这家 ChatGPT 制造商正与投资者就新一轮私募融资进行谈判，该公司估值可能达到约 1.4万亿美元。年化营收是投资者在衡量 OpenAI 的前景及其与 Anthropic 相比的业绩表现时关注的关键指标。

9 月份报道的 500亿美元 年化营收仍表明该集团自夏季以来处于快速扩张状态。但与投资者预期的差距将加剧人们对大型私有 AI 集团发展轨迹的担忧，而这些集团的前景对美国股市至关重要，并助力了美国经济的强劲增长。

OpenAI 致力于在计算能力和基础设施上投入数千亿美元，资金来源包括其 AI 工具的收入以及合作伙伴的大量投资。它还得到了英伟达、微软和亚马逊等科技巨头的支持。

但这家处于亏损状态的公司正与竞争对手 Anthropic、Meta 和谷歌以及规模较小的中国公司展开激烈的竞争。

OpenAI 在 6 月份提交了首次公开募股（IPO）招股书，原预计将于今年秋季上市。但由于人们对强大 AI 所带来威胁的担忧日益增加，该公司随后推迟了这些计划。

首席执行官萨姆·奥特曼（Sam Altman）表示，这家估值 8520亿美元 的初创公司不会“全速冲向 IPO”。 Ahana Datta Fasel page 23

简报

▶ 伯纳姆对柏林加入战斗机项目持开放态度 首相在访问柏林期间寻求与这个欧盟最具影响力的成员国建立更深层的联系，并表示他对于德国加入英国的第六代战斗机计划持开放态度。—— 第2页

柯克兰改变策略 全球营收最高的律师事务所将停止向该行业的律所利润与营收排名机构提供其财务数据，称这样做已不再“合适或必要”。—— 第9页

前情报局长承认过错 被指控叛国罪并被逮捕的德国前对外情报局局长承认持有机密数据，但否认为此支付费用或将其传递给外国势力。—— 第4页

三星飙升至800亿美元 全球最大的内存芯片集团预计其第三季度营业利润将增长近9倍，因为AI公司对芯片的高需求导致了全行业短缺。—— 第10页

▶ FRC谴责德勤 会计监管机构对这家四大会计师事务所处以£6mn的罚款，原因是其在过去五年对铁路和运输运营商Go-Ahead的审计中出现了“令人高度担忧的失败模式”。—— 第12页

美国游说争议加深 唐纳德·特朗普幕僚长的女儿在一家公司工作，该公司签署了一份每月$35,000的合同，代表巴尔干实体塞族共和国（Republika Srpska），这引发了一场关于利益冲突的争端。—— 第8页

▶ 胡塞武装扰乱利雅得 在胡塞武装表示他们用弹道导弹袭击了沙特首都机场后，超过100架航班被取消，与伊朗支持的反叛分子的战斗继续升级。—— 第6页

▶ 特易购上调利润预期 在英国最大的超市上调全年利润预期之际，首席执行官肯·墨菲（Ken Murphy）暗示，在购物者选择更健康方案的当下，今年的圣诞节可能不再那么沉溺于酒精。—— 第12页

星巴克曾探讨在餐饮巨头交易中收购价值$41bn的 Chipotle 连锁店

[...OMITTED...]

前王子面临 4000 万英镑审判的出庭要求

安德鲁·蒙巴顿-温莎（Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor）可能会被传唤在一场 4000 万英镑的欺诈审判中作证。该案涉及一名高盛前银行家，此人被指控盗窃一名土耳其千万富翁的财产。塞尔曼·图尔克（Selman Turk）的律师表示，这位前王子的证词可能有助于其客户反驳一名百万富翁对该前银行家提起的诉讼。另外，查尔斯国王的弟弟在针对今年被捕后执行的警方搜查令的法律斗争中获胜。 证人传票 ▶ 第 3 页

詹姆斯·丰塔内拉-汗（JAMES FONTANELLA-KHAN）与阿拉什·马苏迪（ARASH MASSOUDI）——伦敦；奥利弗·巴恩斯（OLIVER BARNES）与格雷戈里·迈耶（GREGORY MEYER）——纽约

星巴克曾探讨收购 Chipotle Mexican Grill，这是一次雄心勃勃的尝试，旨在将美国两个最知名的品牌联合起来，该交易将成为餐饮业历史上规模最大的合并。

据知情人士透露，这家全球领先的咖啡店连锁店在近几个月与顾问合作，就收购市值 410 亿美元的卷饼连锁店 Chipotle 拟定了一项方案。

目前尚无法确定星巴克收购计划的状态，以及该公司是否已向 Chipotle 提交任何正式报价。

知情人士警告称，如此规模的转型交易可能难以启动，且考虑到合并两个消费巨头的复杂性，此次联合可能永远不会实现。

这一早期计划还将使星巴克首席执行官布莱恩·尼科尔（Brian Niccol）与他曾执掌六年并成名的快餐连锁店重新聚首。自尼科尔于 2024 年 8 月离开 Chipotle 以来，该公司的股价几乎腰斩。

在《金融时报》报道后，星巴克股价下跌 3.9%，市值降至 1030 亿美元。Chipotle 股价上涨 7.2%。

对 Chipotle 的潜在收购将超过汉堡王在 2014 年以 114 亿美元收购加拿大咖啡甜甜圈连锁店 Tim Hortons 的交易，后者是迄今为止规模最大的餐饮业收购案。

这也将成为并购热潮中的最新一项巨额交易，因为美国企业正试图利用唐纳德·特朗普总统领导下的宽松反垄断监管。

此次交易将创建一家去年销售额近 500 亿美元的合并公司。星巴克拥有约 41,000 家自有和特许经营店，其中五分之二位于美国。而 Chipotle 的 4,200 家餐厅几乎全部位于美国。

星巴克拒绝置评，Chipotle 未回应置评请求。

威廉布莱尔（William Blair）分析师莎伦·扎克菲亚（Sharon Zackfia）表示，此次收购“没有明显的营收协同效应”。

在尼科尔的领导下，这家咖啡连锁店正处于名为“回归星巴克”（Back to Starbucks）的转型战略早期阶段，该战略已开始见效，同店销售额和利润均在增长。尼科尔的计划包括增加咖啡师人数、推出新菜单项目、提高服务速度以及翻新咖啡店。

订阅 纸质版与在线版 www.ft.com/subscribenow 电话：0800 028 1407

获取最新新闻请访问 www.ft.com

© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026 期号：42,377 ★

印刷地：伦敦、利物浦、格拉斯哥、都柏林、法兰克福、米兰、马德里、纽约、芝加哥、旧金山、东京、香港、新加坡、首尔、迪拜

9"770307"176159"

股票市场

< / td><>10月08日< / ><>前值< / ><>%变动< / >< / tr><><>标准普尔500指数< / ><>7758.35< / ><>7801.77< / ><>-0.56< / >< / ><><>纳斯达克综合指数< / ><>27368.68< / ><>27538.69< / ><>-0.62< / >< / ><><>道琼斯工业平均指数< / ><>51100.26< / ><>51179.87< / ><>-0.16< / >< / ><><>欧洲斯托克 50 指数< / ><>6126.73< / ><>6180.29< / ><>-0.87< / >< / ><><>富时欧洲全股指数 300< / ><>2498.80< / ><>2517.48< / ><>-0.74< / >< / ><><>富时 100 指数< / ><>10441.60< / ><>10458.50< / ><>-0.16< / >< / ><><>富时综合指数< / ><>5634.04< / ><>5644.81< / ><>-0.19< / >< / ><><>CAC 40 指数< / ><>7729.69< / ><>7769.21< / ><>-0.51< / >< / ><><>Xetra Dax指数< / ><>24806.97< / ><>25104.36< / ><>-1.18< / >< / ><><>日经指数< / ><>69042.11< / ><>70035.71< / ><>-1.42< / >< / ><><>恒生指数< / ><>23785.79< / ><>24130.50< / ><>-1.43< / >< / ><><>MSCI全球指数< / ><>4959.50< / ><>5013.00< / ><>-1.07< / >< / ><><>MSCI新兴市场指数< / ><>1724.00< / ><>1757.00< / ><>-1.88< / >< / ><><>MSCI所有国家世界指数< / ><>1144.90< / ><>1158.60< / ><>-1.18< / >< / table>

全球市场 货币

<><>货币对< / ><>10月08日< / ><>前值< / ><>货币对< / ><>10月08日< / ><>前值< / >< / ><><>$ / €< / ><>1.121< / ><>1.119< / ><>€ / $< / ><>0.892< / ><>0.893< / >< / ><><>$ / £< / ><>1.323< / ><>1.320< / ><>£ / $< / ><>0.756< / ><>0.758< / >< / ><><>£ / €< / ><>0.847< / ><>0.848< / ><>€ / £< / ><>1.180< / ><>1.179< / >< / ><><>¥ / $< / ><>158.215< / ><>158.205< / ><>¥ / €< / ><>177.327< / ><>177.079< / >< / ><><>¥ / £< / ><>209.263< / ><>208.815< / ><>英镑指数< / ><>85.295< / ><>85.42< / >< / ><><>Sfr / €< / ><>0.933< / ><>Sfr / £< / ><>1.102< / ><>1.100< / >< / table>

加密货币

<><>< / ><>10月08日< / ><>前值< / ><>%变动< / >< / ><><>比特币< / ><>81042.90< / ><>83391.53< / ><>-2.82< / >< / ><><>以太坊< / ><>2438.77< / ><>2569.07< / ><>-5.07< / >< / table>

<><>< / ><>10月08日< / ><>前值< / ><>%变动< / >< / ><><>WTI原油< / ><>92.88< / ><>88.28< / ><>5.21< / >< / ><><>布伦特原油 $< / ><>105.74< / ><>100.83< / ><>4.87< / >< / ><><>黄金 $< / ><>4111.46< / ><>4106.46< / ><>0.12< / >< / table>

政府债券

<><>收益率 (%)< / ><>10月08日< / ><>前值< / ><>变动< / >< / ><><>美国 2年期< / ><>4.76< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>美国 10年期< / ><>5.27< / ><>5.31< / ><>-0.04< / >< / ><><>美国 30年期< / ><>5.64< / ><>5.69< / ><>-0.05< / >< / ><><>英国 2年期< / ><>4.71< / ><>4.66< / ><>0.05< / >< / ><><>英国 10年期< / ><>5.41< / ><>5.38< / ><>0.03< / >< / ><><>英国 30年期< / ><>6.00< / ><>5.97< / ><>0.03< / >< / ><><>日本 2年期< / ><>1.88< / ><>1.89< / ><>-0.01< / >< / ><><>日本 10年期< / ><>3.04< / ><>3.07< / ><>-0.03< / >< / ><><>日本 30年期< / ><>4.13< / ><>4.16< / ><>-0.03< / >< / ><><>德国 2年期< / ><>3.06< / ><>3.03< / ><>0.03< / >< / ><><>德国 10年期< / ><>3.47< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>德国 30年期< / ><>3.85< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>

价格为本版最新数据 数据由 ICE 提供。www.ice.com

国内新闻

The Ground Truth 图像显示一条单一的实线，这属于一种风格化或背景元素（类似于纸上的分隔线）。根据规则 2，此类线条必须在 OCR 结果中被忽略。提供的 OCR 内容为 ""，不包含任何字符。由于 OCR 输出正确地忽略了该风格化线条，因此符合规则 2。因此，OCR 结果与 Ground Truth 保持一致。

柏林之行

首相对德国参与战斗机项目持开放态度

伯纳姆在寻求深化国防关系之际向总理梅尔茨提出邀请

劳拉·皮特尔（LAURA PITEL）与艾顺·博拉（AYSUN BORA）——柏林，乔治·帕克（GEORGE PARKER）——伦敦

安迪·伯纳姆（Andy Burnham）表示，英国对于德国加入其第六代战斗机计划持开放态度。他在昨日访问柏林期间，寻求与这个欧盟最具影响力的国家建立更深层的联系。

这位首相表示，他利用与总理弗里德里希·梅尔茨（Friedrich Merz）的讨论，强调了德国成为全球战斗航空计划（Global Combat Aircraft Programme）一部分的意愿。

“这是我们在接下来的时期里，在与另外两个合作伙伴意大利和日本协作时，寻求推进的事项，”伯纳姆补充道。一个法德战斗机项目的崩溃，使得柏林正在寻找新的合作伙伴。

他还概述了一项应对所谓“混合攻击”的新伙伴关系，旨在加强“欧洲最大经济体、两个最大的国防投资者”之间的安全与国防合作。

在准备为下个月布鲁塞尔的双边峰会制定英国与欧盟关系更紧密的“选项”之际，伯纳姆将梅尔茨视为潜在的盟友。

据一名英国官员透露，首相告诉梅尔茨，英国“所有选项均可行”——包括英国申请重新加入该集团。

与法国总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙（Emmanuel Macron）和西班牙首相佩德罗·桑切斯（Pedro Sánchez）不同，梅尔茨并未公开支持英国重返欧盟。但他告诉伯纳姆，他将提供“任何可能的支持”以帮助改善两国关系。

梅尔茨表示，尽管英国“不幸”离开了该集团，但柏林渴望追求“友谊与双边合作”，并希望利用两国去年签署的一项条约来开拓新机遇。他补充说，他“由衷地高兴”欢迎伯纳姆访问柏林。

新一代：2024年范堡罗国际航展上展示的全球战斗航空计划战斗机全尺寸模型

伯纳姆表示，他将在11月峰会前讨论英国的长期选项，然后尝试在下次选举前达成国家“共识”，该选举必须在2029年夏天前举行。

伯纳姆还利用柏林会谈，寻求梅尔茨的支持，以试图阻止英国受到旨在保护欧盟免受中国竞争的新规则的影响。一名英国官员表示，英国对布鲁塞尔“欧洲制造”（Made in Europe）政策的担忧——该政策旨在政府采购和补贴制度中向欧盟公司倾斜——在“应对不公平贸易实践的共同挑战”背景下被提及。

首相上个月表示，“欧洲制造”是布鲁塞尔正在起草的拟议《工业加速法案》（Industrial Accelerator Act）的一部分，这可能会给英国带来“附带

梅尔茨告诉伯纳姆，他将提供“任何可能的支持”以帮助改善关系

损害”，包括损害跨海峡的供应链。

德国经常敦促将英国纳入欧盟计划，并抵制巴黎的观点，后者主张此类协议应仅限于成员国。该法案将为政府采购和绿色补贴设定本地含量和低碳要求。柏林正在倡导一种广泛的“贸易伙伴”方案。

昨日，法国财政部长罗兰·莱斯屈尔（Roland Lescure）告诉BBC，他希望英国能“走完最后一步”并重新加入欧盟。“随时欢迎回来，”他说。

在被问及法国反对英国成为“欧洲制造”计划正式成员一事时，莱斯屈尔表示：“如果英国是欧洲的一部分，他们现在就会在谈判桌上讨论这件事。回来吧，你就会在谈判桌前，我们可以一起讨论所有这些事情。”

柏林记者 Anne-Sylvaine Chassany 参与报道

低调启动：退伍军人驾驶自制船进行试航

Ground Truth 图像显示一条单一的实线，这是一个风格化或背景元素（如纸上的分隔线）。根据 Rule 2，此类线条必须在 OCR 结果中被忽略。提供的 OCR 内容为 ""，不包含任何字符。由于 OCR 输出正确地忽略了风格化线条，因此符合 Rule 2。因此，OCR 结果与 Ground Truth 一致。

退役陆军少校米克·斯坦利（Mick Stanley）昨日在奇切斯特的西威特灵帆船俱乐部（West Wittering Sailing Club）驾驶他的新船“铁塔三号”（Tintanic III）进行试航，该船将于春季正式启动以筹集圣威尔弗里德安宁疗养院（St Wilfrid's Hospice）的资金。这位 86 岁的老人此前通过自制的“铁塔一号”和“铁塔二号”为慈善机构筹集了数千英镑，他曾驾驶这些船在苏格兰、威尔士和英格兰的运河、湖泊、河流及公海中航行，还曾在巴黎的塞纳河上航行了一天。

Matthews / PA Wire

Ground Truth 图像显示一条单一的实线，这是一个风格化或背景元素（如纸上的分隔线）。根据 Rule 2，此类线条必须在 OCR 结果中被忽略。提供的 OCR 内容为 ""，不包含任何字符。由于 OCR 输出正确地忽略了风格化线条，因此符合 Rule 2。因此，OCR 结果与 Ground Truth 一致。

剑桥郡

两名拉脱维亚人因涉嫌在英国皇家空军基地非法闯入被捕

罗伯特·赖特（ROBERT WRIGHT）

两名拉脱维亚男子涉嫌违反《国家安全法》被警方逮捕，此前他们被指非法闯入剑桥郡的一个军事基地。这是 2 周内与美国空军有联系的英国皇家空军（RAF）设施发生的第 2 起安全事件。

该事件发生在剑桥郡亨廷顿附近的莫尔斯沃思皇家空军基地（RAF Molesworth）。该基地设有北约联盟的情报融合中心以及美国军方欧洲司令部使用的一个中心。

美国军方还在格洛斯特郡的费尔福德皇家空军基地（RAF Fairford）开展运作，9月 27. 日凌晨，一组男子在该地因涉嫌恐怖主义罪行被捕。隶属于伦敦警察厅的伦敦反恐警察局（Counter Terrorism Policing London）昨日表示，莫尔斯沃思的安保巡逻人员在周三晚上 10pm 左右发现了一辆被遗弃的车辆。

“随后发现周界围栏有轻微破损，10月 8 日大约 02:00 时，两名男子被发现并被逮捕，”伦敦反恐警察局表示。警方补充称，两名年龄分别为 36 岁和 32, 岁的男子在基地周界内被捕。声明称：“两名男子均为拉脱维亚国民，目前居住在英国。”

伦敦反恐警察局表示，两人最初因涉嫌非法闯入禁区和刑事损坏被捕，并被带往剑桥郡的一个警察局。该部门补充道：“随后，两人又因涉嫌违反 2023, 年《国家安全法》第 4 条，即为了某种目的进入禁区而再次被捕—。

“其中很大一部分工作是调查这些人出现在该现场的任何潜在动机”

对英国有害。目前两名男子仍被警方拘留。”

反恐警察局（CTPL）补充称，由于事件的性质，该局正主导此次调查，且目前正针对彼得伯勒（Peterborough）地区的两个地址开展与调查相关的搜查。

此次逮捕发生在费尔福德（Fairfield）皇家空军基地事件后不到两周。在之前的事件中，五名英国男子在基地附近被捕，他们乘坐三辆面包车，车内携带了被警方描述为“大量汽油”的物品。

随后，CTPL在伦敦又逮捕了两名与费尔福德事件相关的男子（其中包括一名英伊双国籍公民），同样涉嫌恐怖主义罪行。所有七名男子均已获保释。

CTPL负责人海伦·弗拉纳根（Helen Flanagan）指挥官承认，费尔福德皇家空军基地事件引发了关注，并表示该部门“非常意识到近期人们对军事基地的高度关注和担忧”。

但她表示，目前没有证据表明此次事件与费尔福德皇家空军基地的事件有关。

她表示：“我们对此次事件的调查仍处于非常早期的阶段。其中很大一部分工作是调查这些人出现在该现场的任何潜在动机，但我必须强调，目前我们保持开放的态度，调查仍在深入进行中。”

负责管理美国空军在费尔福德和莫尔斯沃思（Molesworth）活动的美国空军第501战斗支援联队表示，感谢当地执法合作伙伴的“迅速反应和持续支持”。（查尔斯·克洛弗 Charles Clover 参与报道）

评论

专家呼吁心理健康领域应侧重于提供帮助而非诊断

克里斯·史密斯（CHRIS SMYTH）——伦敦

一项由政府委托的审查报告指出，为患有心理健康问题或多动症（ADHD）的人群进行诊断可能会限制他们的生活。该报告建议，英国公共服务在提供支持时，应以帮助患者在社交生活、教育和工作中取得成功为基础。

在部长们因病假津贴开支增加以及国民医疗服务体系（NHS）心理健康治疗候诊名单延长而下令开展的这项审查中，顶尖专家将于今日表示，服务方向应重新调整，旨在为人们的功能性问题提供快速帮助，而非专注于诊断。

由伦敦大学学院（University College London）彼得·福纳吉（Peter Fonagy）教授领导的报告称，在16至24岁的人群中，约有四分之一的人报告患有焦虑或抑郁等常见心理健康问题，且在年轻人中的增长速度最快。福纳吉否认了关于“雪花一代”（snowflake generation）的说法，并指出“痛苦感的增加是真实存在的，而且程度显著且真实”。

不稳定的工作、考试压力和难以负担的住房被列为增长原因，但福纳吉表示，更重要的原因是“年轻人缺乏一种希望，认为他们的生活会比父母更好”。

他告诉记者，社交媒体主要通过“取代更健康的事物”产生影响，例如睡眠、运动和社交。

审查报告指出，虽然药物可以提供帮助，但不应使用药物来处理诸如孤独感之类的情况。福纳吉补充说，补救措施可以包括为年轻人提供更多参与社交、工作和志愿服务的“机会”。

相比之下，审查发现，多动症和自闭症的真实发病率在一段时间内基本保持稳定，而近年来记录病例的快速增加，部分原因是纠正了历史上的诊断不足。但审查报告副主席西蒙·韦塞利（Simon Wessely）教授表示，在诊断率高企且没有放缓迹象的情况下，“过度诊断或过度医疗化的风险……极有可能发生”。

前内阁部长艾伦·米尔本（Alan Milburn）即将就如何帮助近100万名未在接受教育、就业或培训的年轻人提交建议，韦塞利表示，诊断可能会让求职者望而却步，从而产生风险。

NHS漫长的候诊名单导致提供多动症和自闭症评估的公司激增，韦塞利引用《金融时报》的报道，强调了“对部分供应商评估质量的担忧”。

该审查呼吁对私人供应商的资金和监管进行全面改革，以确保标准的一致性。

作为回应，卫生大臣伊薇特·库珀（Yvette Cooper）承诺将“加强对心理健康和神经发育服务的监督”，包括对私人评估进行监管。

报告建议，诊断不应再成为获得教育、雇主或福利系统帮助的门槛。报告称，教师和雇主应更愿意介入并帮助那些陷入困境的学生或员工。

库珀表示政府将采取行动。而多动症活动人士则批评“许多人不应接受诊断”这一建议是某种形式的“配额限制”。

立即订阅 ft.com / subscribetoday

英国与以色列就英国领事馆问题达成妥协

詹姆斯·肖特（JAMES SHOTTER）——耶路撒冷 大卫·谢泼德（DAVID SHEPPARD）与露西·费舍尔（LUCY FISHER） 伦敦

英国外交大臣昨日表示，位于东耶路撒冷的英国总领事馆将保持开放，但其地位将发生改变。该举措是一项旨在遏制英国与以色列之间不断升级的外交争端之协议的一部分。

上个月，以色列下令完全关闭这座拥有近200年历史的领事馆。此前，英国政府宣布将对以色列在被占领的约旦河西岸的非法定居点实施制裁，以色列采取的一系列报复措施中便包括此项命令。

然而，在英以官员进行了数周谈判后，以色列外交部长吉迪昂·萨尔（Gideon Sa'ar）及其英国同行埃德·米利班德（Ed Miliband）昨日宣布达成一项协议。根据该协议，该领事馆将更名为“英国代表团”（the UK Mission），且原有的27名外交官中将有7人继续在那里工作。

萨尔表示，该建筑“从今天起停止履行领事馆职能”，且留任外交官的“活动范围”将“非常有限”。他补充说，这一安排旨在“防止两国关系进一步恶化”，且作为协议的一部分，英国已同意不对以色列此前采取的步骤进行报复。

米利班德表示，英国认为以色列没有法律权利关闭该领事馆。该馆位于东耶路撒冷的谢赫-贾拉（Sheikh Jarrah）社区，英国及大多数国际社会将其视为被占领领土。

不过，他表示，在与以色列政府进行讨论期间，英国已“暂时撤离了部分工作人员及其家属”。

米利班德补充说，在“此类讨论正在进行且具有可信度”期间，英国不会采取诸如驱逐以色列外交官等“对等行动”。

“这将确保我们维持长期的英国存在，以及英国在支持‘两国方案’方面所扮演的角色，”米利班德说道，并补充称该代表团将继续向巴勒斯坦人提供服务。

“我们将在接下来的几个月里努力恢复我们的规模。”

一名熟悉情况的人士表示，该协议是在以色列和英国官员进行密集谈判后达成的，代表了一种“妥协”，使以色列能够“在不过分伤害英国人的情况下获得其想要的结果”。

'英国代表团'：以色列此前曾下令关闭该领事馆，但作为保持建筑开放协议的一部分，该馆已被重新命名。Abir Sultan / 英国官员为该协议辩护，指出以色列最初的威胁是完全关闭领事馆，而保留在耶路撒冷的英国存在将使未来（可能在选举之后）的规模恢复变得更加容易。

英国政府人士强调，伦敦保留采取对等行动的权利，但认为在以色列竞选期间这样做是不合适的。

关闭英国领事馆的命令是以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡（Benjamin Netanyahu）的极右翼政府近年来针对其国际批评者采取的一系列行动中最剧烈的一次。此前，以色列已针对爱尔兰、西班牙和挪威承认巴勒斯坦的行为采取了报复措施。

上个月，在荷兰开始对来自巴勒斯坦领土内犹太定居点的商品实施制裁后，以色列还撤销了驻西岸荷兰外交官的认证。

国内新闻

前王子可能在 £40mn 民事欺诈案中被传唤出庭

蒙巴顿-温莎可能被要求在涉及一名富豪女性与银行家的案件中提供证词

ALISTAIR GRAY 法律法院记者

安德鲁·蒙巴顿-温莎（Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor）可能会被传唤在伦敦的一场 £40mn 民事欺诈案中作证。该案涉及一名曾就职于高盛（Goldman Sachs）的银行家，他被指控挪用一名土耳其千万富翁的资产。

塞尔曼·图尔克（Selman Turk）的律师希望这位前王子能出席即将举行的高等法院（High Court）诉讼程序，并表示他的证词可以帮助其客户反驳一名富豪女性对该银行家提起的诉讼，该诉讼指控其抽走了她的资金。

《金融时报》在向法院提交申请后看到的一份为期 11 周的审理时间表草案中，初步将蒙巴顿-温莎的作证时间定在 12 月。

然而，提起诉讼的女性律师对此举表示反对，称为了尝试强迫蒙巴顿-温莎作为证人出庭而采取的准备步骤过于迟缓，且他可能提供的任何证据都与本案无关。

在周三就此事进行了约 90 分钟的法庭辩论后，

亚当·约翰逊（Adam Johnson）法官表示，他将在稍后日期发布裁决。

此次辩论发生在另一场涉及蒙巴顿-温莎的听证会前夕。在昨天的这场听证会中，蒙巴顿-温莎在一项法律挑战中获胜，法院认定其今年被捕后对其房产执行的搜查令合法性存在问题。

针对图尔克的另一起民事案件是由内巴哈特·埃夫亚普·伊什比伦（Nebahat Evyap İşbilen）提起的，她在丈夫（一名政治人物）入狱后逃离土耳其移居英国。

她的律师称，她委托图尔克将约 $90mn 的资产转移出土耳其，以防止被没收。伊什比伦指控图尔克挪用了约 £40mn，其中包括将其转入其控制的离岸结构和公司。

图尔克否认有任何不当行为，坚称所有转移均经过授权且目的是为了保护她的财富，并且他已对其资产进行了账目说明。

在伊什比伦的律师获取的披露信息显示，源自伊什比伦的大量资金流向了这位前王子的家属，蒙巴顿-温莎随后卷入了这场纠纷。其中包括一笔

律师称前王子的证词将具有“高度相关性和高度证明力”

于 2019 年 11 月从伊什比伦在 Hampden & Co 私人银行的账户转移给蒙巴顿-温莎的款项。

在诉状中，伊什比伦的律师表示，图尔克告诉她这笔钱是给已故女王次子的“礼物”，以确保他在处理她土耳其护照问题时提供帮助。

在针对该指控的辩护中，图尔克否认曾告诉她资金与护照协助有关，并坚称是伊什比伦指示的转账。

辩方补充称，他认为这笔款项是给贝特丽克斯公主（Princess Beatrice）的结婚礼物，贝特丽克斯公主是蒙巴顿-温莎与其前妻、前约克公爵夫人莎拉·弗格森（Sarah Ferguson）的长女。

伊什比伦的律师表示，资金是通过一家名为 Alphabet Capital 的公司转交给蒙巴顿-温莎和弗格森的。

根据其律师提交的书面陈述以及早前的法院判决，蒙巴顿-温莎已偿还了该款项并与伊什比伦达成和解，目前不再有针对他或其前妻的未决索赔。

2018 年，安德鲁·蒙巴顿-温莎在温莎城堡外帮助他的女儿贝特丽克斯公主整理裙摆。下方的塞尔曼·图尔克表示，他认为转入前王子账户的款项是结婚礼物。

伊什比伦（İşbilen）的律师在书面提交的文件中表示，“蒙巴顿-温莎先生（Mr Mountbatten-Windsor）证词将涵盖的主题在很大程度上是不相关的”，且会对审判造成干扰。

然而，图尔克（Turk）的律师在书面提交的文件中表示，涉及其家政人员的交易已被用作针对他的案件的“核心支柱”，旨在攻击其可信度。

他们告诉法院，蒙巴顿-温莎（去年10月被国王剥夺头衔）的证词将具有“高度相关性和高度证明力”，但图尔克尝试联系这位前王子的努力已经失败。

图尔克的律师正寻求法院允许提交一份延迟的所谓“证人摘要”——这是一种初步的法律文件，用于在证人不提供自愿陈述的情况下，尝试强制其作证之前提交。

如果获得批准，并非本案当事人的蒙巴顿-温莎将有权请求法院撤销随后发出的任何传票。

蒙巴顿-温莎没有立即回应置评请求。

法官裁定用于搜查皇家住所的警察搜查令非法

安德鲁·蒙巴顿-温莎（Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor）在一场关于警察搜查令合法性的法律挑战中获胜。此前，警察在今年因涉及爱泼斯坦（Epstein）文件而逮捕这位前王子之前，获得了搜查其两处房产的搜查令。

伦敦高等法院的一名法官昨天表示，泰晤士河谷警察局（Thames Valley Police）在蒙巴顿-温莎在其66岁生日当天因涉嫌职务犯罪被捕前获得搜查令时，“犯了一个重大错误”。

该警局表示，它承认在今年2月一名中央刑事法院（Old Bailey）法官授权警员突击搜查查尔斯国王弟弟的住所并没收设备和文件时，使用了错误的法律权力。尽管搜查令已被撤销，但尼古拉斯·希利亚德（Nicholas Hilliard）法官昨天表示，这“并不意味着调查就此结束，也不意味着整个调查过程是非法的”。

侦探们目前正通过私下法院程序争取保留他们获取的文件和计算机，而蒙巴顿-温莎的律师对此表示反对。

由中央刑事法院于2月18日签发的搜查令允许警员搜查蒙巴顿-温莎位于诺福克郡桑德灵厄姆庄园（Sandringham Estate）的住宅，以及他位于温莎大公园皇家小屋（Royal Lodge）的前住所。

他在2月19日的被捕，是自英国内战结束时的查尔斯一世以来，首位因刑事搜查令而被捕的王室成员。

希利亚德表示，这些搜查令不应被批准，因为相关材料涉及机密或受法律特权保护的记录。虽然可以申请获取此类材料，但需要满足更高的法律门槛。

一名熟悉该流程的人士指出，泰晤士河谷警察局曾寻求正确的搜查令，但法院向该局保证仅需标准搜查令即可。

警方表示，在美司法部（DOJ）的爱泼斯坦文件中披露了蒙巴顿-温莎在2001年至2011年期间担任英国贸易投资部无薪特别代表时的行为后，针对他的调查仍在继续。

去年被国王剥夺头衔的蒙巴顿-温莎否认有任何不当行为。

如果能证明警员最初可以合法地获取这些材料，法官可以允许他们保留这些材料，但预计明年才会做出决定。

泰晤士河谷警察局昨天表示，法院的决定“并非是对我们正在进行的调查的判定”。

该局表示，它保留了证据，并希望如果在持续的法律行动中获胜，能够将其用于调查。作者：Alistair Gray 和 Robert Wright

创新走廊

伯纳姆支持牛津-剑桥连接项目

克里斯·史密斯（CHRIS SMYTH）

在首相寻求安抚投资者并否认其不关心英格兰南部之说之际，安迪·伯纳姆（Andy Burnham）承诺将推进牛津与剑桥的连接项目。

部长们计划在未来几周内与地方政府和商业领袖会面，试图提高该国生产力最高地区之一的投资。增长部长丹·汤姆林森（Dan Tomlinson）坚称，首相正在“支持那些英国已经在全球领先的地区”。

前财政大臣瑞秋·里夫斯（Rachel Reeves）去年曾承诺支持铁路和公路项目，旨在将牛津与剑桥之间的走廊打造成为“欧洲的硅谷”。这一优先发展该地区的决定曾受到部分北方工党议员的批评，他们认为这会将人才和活力吸向南部。

伯纳姆在7月就任首相以来尚未对该项目发表评论，而他专注于通过在曼彻斯特设立一个新的“北区 10 号唐宁街”（Number 10 North）将权力下放到英格兰各地区，这导致工党高层发出警告，称他面临被视为反对伦敦和东南部地区的风险。

然而，汤姆林森认为，这并不意味着忽视那些已经繁荣的地区。

他说：“每个邮政编码区都能实现良好增长，意味着要支持那些英国已经在全球领先的地区，并确保利益惠及全国每个角落。”他承诺通过将牛津、米尔顿凯恩斯和剑桥连接成一个繁荣的经济区，来“帮助更多英国公司在这里创业、规模化并留在这里”。

部长们一直在争取阿拉伯联合酋长国（UAE）为该项目提供投资，但阿联酋私下警告部长们，在与阿联酋有深厚联系的曼城足球俱乐部被裁定违反英超联赛财务规则后，其参与该项目的可能性面临风险。

政府表示，牛津-剑桥项目是“推动良好增长议程的关键部分”。

汤姆林森和被任命为该项目倡导者的前科学部长帕特里克·瓦兰斯勋爵（Lord Patrick Vallance）将通过“北区 10 号唐宁街”汇报进展，伯纳姆希望该机构能充当政府的增长部门。

瓦兰斯表示，牛津和剑桥在创新方面的实力是“毋庸置疑的”，但“现在的任务是将更多此类创新转化为英国本土的公司、就业机会和增长”。

该项目的负责人对伯纳姆的承诺表示欢迎，认为这是一个向全球投资者发出的重要信号，表明政府仍致力于开发该地区。

牛津-剑桥超级集群（Oxford-Cambridge Supercluster，一个汇集该地区工业界和大学的组织）主席安迪·威廉姆斯（Andy Williams）表示，伯纳姆政府的公开支持对于吸引私人资本“至关重要”。

国家安全

海军士兵因涉嫌间谍活动出庭

罗伯特·赖特 (ROBERT WRIGHT)

一名英国皇家海军士兵因涉嫌违反《国家安全法》出庭受审。他被指控在战争情报部门任职期间收集秘密信息，并准备将受保护的信息泄露给外国势力（据称是俄罗斯）。

24岁的泰迪·杨 (Teddy Young) 面临两项指控：一项是准备泄露受保护信息；另一项是“获取、复制、记录或保留受保护信息，且意图使该行为使外国势力获益”。

指控摘要将该外国势力确定为俄罗斯。

虽然此前已有数人因涉嫌代表俄罗斯行动而被根据 2023 年《国家安全法》逮捕，但这是已知首例涉及英国武装部队现役成员涉嫌准备向该国泄露受保护信息的案件。

此次指控出现之际，随着弗拉基米尔·普京总统的政府试图对西方支持乌克兰做出反应，整个欧洲对与俄罗斯对抗的敏感度正处于高位。

昨日泰迪·杨在法庭上的艺术想象图

杨昨日在威斯敏斯特治安法院出庭。

提供给记者并在法庭上提及的指控摘要称，杨在担任拥有高级安全许可和情报系统访问权限的皇家海军战争情报兵期间，“访问并保留”了敏感的英国国防和情报资料。此外，据称他从事了与准备将受保护信息传递给外国势力一致的活动。

在简短的听证会上，杨仅开口确认了自己的姓名和年龄。

现场未提出保释申请，地区法官安娜贝尔·皮林 (Annabel Pilling) 将杨还押候审，其下次出庭时间定于下周五在中央刑事法院（Old Bailey）。

伦敦反恐警察局表示，此次事件与 9 月 27 日在格洛斯特郡费尔福德皇家空军基地（RAF Fairford）附近发生的事件无关。

伦敦反恐警察局负责人海伦·弗拉纳根 (Helen Flanagan) 指挥官表示，这些指控是“针对一名武装部队现役成员的非常严重的指控”。她补充道：“随着调查的推进，我们与国防部相关的行动同事进行了极其密切的合作，以确保能够采取适当措施，减轻与此事相关的任何潜在风险。”

养老金政策

前官员称“三重锁”最初估算成本仅为 5000 万英镑n

德尔菲娜·斯特劳斯 (DELPHINE STRAUSS)

据时任经济战略首席顾问透露，当国会议员最初决定采取养老金“三重锁”（triple lock）措施时，其估算成本仅为 5000 万英镑n，而该措施随后的实际成本竟高达此数的 300 倍。

这项关于国家养老金价值的保证——确保其每年随通货膨胀率、工资增长率或 2.5% 中的最高值而上涨——是自由民主党在 2010 年大选后与保守党进行组建联合政府谈判时的核心诉求。

时任候任财政大臣乔治·奥斯本 (George Osborne) 幕僚长的鲁珀特·哈里森 (Rupert Harrison) 表示，在试图将两党竞选宣言转化为经济战略的紧张谈判最后阶段，保守党团队派遣了一名负责人要求财政部官员对该政策进行成本估算。

“半小时后，他回来报了一个数字：成本将是 5000 万英镑n。这不是笔误，”哈里森在昨天由债券集团品格 (Pimco) 分发的一份便函中这样写道，他目前在该公司担任高级顾问。

他补充说，财政部实际的计算结果“可能为零”，并指出当时的预测显示，没有任何一年工资增长会低于通货膨胀率或 2.5%。这意味着“三重锁”的成本不会高于之前的工资指数化政策。

“财政部官员可能觉得不能报零，所以他们选择了 5000 万英镑n 作为一个合适的小数字，”哈里森在便函中写道，但便函中并未说明财政部预计这 5000 万英镑n 的成本将在什么时间范围内产生。

一旦实施，“三重锁”被证明在政治上是历届政府都无法放弃的，即便英国进入了一个工资增长缓慢或停滞、且期间伴随高通胀爆发的长期阶段。

根据财政研究所 (IFS) 的估计，直到上个月，当首相安迪·伯纳姆 (Andy Burnham) 正式取消工党在下次大选中维持“三重锁”的承诺时，该政策的“棘轮”效应已使国家养老金的年度支出增加了 160亿英镑。

政府表示，其计划中的改革——用一项新承诺取代“三重锁”，即每年根据通货膨胀率或 2.5% 提高国家养老金，并随时间推移根据工资增长调整——将在 2039-40 年度节省 110亿英镑。

但哈里森表示，导致该政策成本难以预测的相同逻辑，也适用于对其废除后节省金额的估算。IFS 估计，到 2039-40 年度，国库每年的收益将在 40亿英镑 至 200亿英镑 之间。

哈里森认为，考虑到政府还承诺创建一项新的“国家护理服务”，这意味着“它可能在国债投资者那里赢得的任何财政信誉因此都被抵消了”。

财政部未立即回应置评请求。

国际

国家安全

前柏林情报局局长承认持有文件

律师称当事人持有机密文件但未将其传递

萨姆·琼斯（SAM JONES）——科隆 艾顺·博拉（AYSUN BORA）与安娜斯塔西娅·斯托格内（ANASTASIA STOGNEI） 柏林

一名因叛国罪被捕的德国前对外情报局局长承认持有机密信息，但否认为此支付费用或将其传递给外国势力。

奥古斯特·汉宁（August Hanning）的律师莱昂·克鲁斯（Leon Kruse）昨日告诉《金融时报》，他的当事人正遭受“错误起诉”，叛国指控是“毫无根据的”，尽管他确实“持有机密文件”这一说法是“真实的”。汉宁现年 80 岁，于周二被拘留。根据检察官披露的信息，这似乎是现代德国历史上最大规模的国家安全泄密事件之一。此案在西方情报机构中引起了剧烈震动，并引发了人们对前间谍在离开公职后从事的、在很大程度上缺乏监管的商业活动的质疑。

汉宁在担任德国对外情报局（BND）局长及内政部国务秘书后于 2009 年退休。他被指控在过去 16 年中从一名 BND 官员处购买了数千份高度机密的文件。其中大部分信息仅供总理和高级部长审阅。检察官表示，这种安排一直持续到今年。根据德国法律，买卖国家秘密是违法的。

克鲁斯否认其当事人为情报支付了费用。该律师表示：“虽然他持有机密文件是事实，但关于他将其中包含的信息传递出去并损害德意志联邦共和国利益——更不用说为了获取报酬——的指控是毫无根据的。”

德国检察官表示，汉宁与两个外国情报机构保持着活跃联系。熟悉调查的官员表示，此案不涉及俄罗斯因素。在离开公职后，汉宁担任企业和富裕客户的私人顾问。他曾是德阿塞拜疆论坛（German-Azerbaijan forum）的董事会成员，该论坛是一个旨在促进巴库利益的游说团体。据知情人士透露，他的其他客户包括乌克兰、以色列、奥地利和德国的企业、个人以及政治敏感人物。

收到过相关消息的人士告诉《金融时报》，汉宁曾代表其客户与欧洲和美国的资深情报官员及外交官接触。正是其中一名客户的案件触发了对他的调查——该客户是一名德国继承人，据称她曾派遣一支团队前往丹麦，试图从孩子父亲手中绑架孩子。

检察官表示，至少在一次实例中，汉宁利用他获取的秘密，为雇佣他担任顾问的某个“外国情报机构”准备了一份分析报告。

德国《镜报》（Der Spiegel）周二援引匿名消息来源报道称，一名阿塞拜疆情报特工可能是汉宁准备的一份包含德国政府机密信息的报告的预期接收者。

阿塞拜疆的国家媒体和广播委员会将有关该国与汉宁调查相关报道描述为“虚假信息”。

巴西。总统竞选

博尔索纳罗誓要对预算“动用大剪刀”

这位参议员将平衡公共账目作为其亲商政纲的核心

迈克尔·普勒（MICHAEL POOLER）——圣保罗

哈维尔·米莱（Javier Milei）曾誓言用电锯砍掉阿根廷臃肿的政府，而他在邻国巴西的极右翼盟友弗拉维奥·博尔索纳罗（Flávio Bolsonaro）则在竞选集会上挥舞着一把大剪刀。

在第一轮选举中取得两个百分点的领先，并处于本月赢得总统宝座的有利位置后，这位被监禁的前领导人雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗（Jair Bolsonaro）之子，已将平衡公共账目作为其亲商政纲的核心。

在与左翼总统路易斯·伊纳西奥·卢拉·达席尔瓦（Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva）进行决选之前，这位45岁的参议员团队承诺，将通过相当于GDP 1.5%（约400亿加元）的支出削减，来应对高企的债务和借贷成本。

“我将在明年1月起动用大剪刀。我们将削减税收，削减官僚主义，削减腐败，”他在8月的一次集会上表示。

在卢拉执政期间，这个拉丁美洲最大经济体的公共债务已攀升至GDP的83%——对于一个发展中国家来说，这是一个相对较高的水平，一些经济学家警告称，这可能面临不可持续的风险。巴西的预算赤字在G20国家中处于最高之列。

“情况非常紧迫，”高盛（Goldman Sachs）首席拉丁美洲经济学家阿尔贝托·拉莫斯（Alberto Ramos）表示，“如果不处理，这就是一颗定时炸弹。”

卢拉的批评者认为，支出增加和预算短缺迫使央行维持紧缩的货币政策以抑制通胀。尽管今年有所下调，但基准利率仍为13.75%，使政府、消费者和企业承受着沉重的融资成本。

博尔索纳罗承诺减少政府部门数量，并打击公共部门的特权和社保欺诈。但除此之外，他尚未详细阐明将如何实现这一雄心勃勃的财政紧缩计划，分析人士表示，随着经济增速放缓，这一计划在政治执行上可能面临挑战。

尽管博尔索纳罗拟议的削减幅度在百分比上比米莱在阿根廷实施的“休克疗法”更为温和，

削减承诺：弗拉维奥·博尔索纳罗上个月在圣保罗争取支持。下方为左翼领导人路易斯·伊纳西奥·卢拉·达席尔瓦。Andre Penner / 美联社照片

但他对财政纪律的承诺受到了投资者的欢迎。在周日的第一轮结果公布后，当地股市和巴西雷亚尔汇率大幅上涨。

“我们认为，弗拉维奥·博尔索纳罗获胜带来的积极信心冲击，可能会导致中期内利率下降，从而有助于改善巴西的财政动态，”威廉布莱尔（William Blair）的投资组合经理贾里德·卢（Jared Lou）表示。

博尔索纳罗的计划包括一个未具体说明的债务与GDP比率目标，如果未能达成，可能会触发预算限制。他的团队还承诺撤销卢拉的增税措施。

然而，尽管市场热情高涨，但在卢拉时期稳健增长的势头减弱之际，推行不受欢迎的紧缩政策是否可行仍存在疑问。社会保障和工资等强制性项目占据了巴西预算的约90%，这意味着如果没有立法变更，政府几乎没有操作空间。

该国巨额的利息支出是国库的另一项负担。预计2026年的基本预算赤字（即利息支付前）将为GDP的0.4%。但在计入债务成本后，缺口将扩大至8.9%，超过了世界上大多数最大的经济体。

为了防止债务进一步上升，一些经济学家认为需要实现约2.5%的基本盈余。

尽管如此，周日立法选举中右翼势力的强劲增长增强了投资者对博索纳罗经济议程的信心。分析人士认为，他的自由党扩大了其在国会中最大单一势力的地位，并且在其他保守派和中间党派的支持下，应该能够在两院建立起多数席位。

成本削减可能通过针对特定领域来实现，例如超出宪法上限的所谓公共部门“超高薪”，以及取消将某些福利和养老金与最低工资增长挂钩的规定。

然而，这些措施将面临受影响群体和游说团体的抵制，且某些措施（如私有化或取消企业税收优惠）需要经过议会批准。

“我们认为弗拉维奥无法兑现他提出的所有承诺”

“我们认为弗拉维奥无法兑现他提出的所有承诺，尤其是削减相当于 GDP 1.5% 的全部支出，”欧亚集团（Eurasia Group）咨询公司的政治分析师莱昂纳多·梅拉·雷斯（Leonardo Meira Reis）表示。

“但从更广泛的层面来看，他将能够通过一个新的财政框架……国会从一开始就会大力支持他的经济议程。”

不过他警告称，即使是一个更保守的立法机构也不会自动在财政上保持自律。立法者在用于“分肥”项目的自由裁量支出中所占份额日益增加，这可能难以遏制。

卢拉领导的劳工党本周表示，其右翼对手可能会打击社会政策和公共服务，并补充称，在该候选人的父亲执政期间，学校餐食和免费药物等项目的资金被压缩或冻结。博索纳罗的父亲因削弱环境执法机构而受到国际社会的批评。

曾在博索纳罗与金融部门之间充当中间人的银行家马塞洛·卡亚斯（Marcelo Kayath）表示，该候选人致力于在这个极不平等的国家维持福利计划，称之为一种“富有同情心的右翼”方案。

“（博索纳罗）并不希望削减社会计划，也不希望将财政调整的负担压在最贫困阶层身上，”曾任瑞信巴西区负责人的卡亚斯说道。

但他警告称，在其他领域进行大幅削减是不可避免的：“我们没有其他选择。要么这样做，要么我们可能在几个月后面临危机。”

“如果我们不能以协调且建设性的方式进行调整，市场将会采取行动……且是以一种不可控的方式。这将引发一场比必要情况严重得多的经济衰退。” 贝亚特丽斯·兰格拉（Beatriz Langella）参与报道

经济

德国政府支出将推动四年来最快增长

奥拉夫·斯托贝克（OLAF STORBECK）——法兰克福

根据最新的官方预测，出口和由政府债务资助的支出有助于结束多年的停滞，德国经济正朝着四年来最快的增长速度迈进。

欧洲最大的经济体预计今年将增长 1.3 per cent，是政府在 4 月份预测的 0.5 per cent 增长的两倍多。对于 2027, 柏林预计 GDP 将增长 1.1 。

经济部昨日表示：“德国经济正处于增长路径上，并证明了其比预期更具韧性”，并补充说，尽管存在中东冲突和能源价格上涨，今年前六个月的 GDP 仍“强劲增长”。

自 2022, 俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰以来，由于能源价格上涨和广泛的不确定性使该国陷入现代史上最长的停滞期，德国经济一直处于低迷状态。从季度来看，经济产出直到 2026 上半年才超过 2022 下旬的峰值。

去年，总理弗里德里希·梅尔茨（Friedrich Merz）领导的联合政府启动了一项大规模的债务资助投资计划，拨出 €1tn 用于未来十年的基础设施和国防支出。

政府昨日表示，到 2028, “来自专项基金的财政刺激和国防支出预计将对公共投资和政府消费产生显著影响”。

尽管美国与伊朗的战争在不到 5 年的时间里引发了第二次能源价格冲击，但该经济体依然表现出韧性。

在美国和以色列于 2 月下旬对伊朗发动袭击后，油价从每桶 $70 以下飙升至 $100, 促使欧洲央行自 6 月以来 2 次加息。交易员已完全将第三次加息 25 个基点至 2.75 的价格因素计入到 2027 年初的预期中。

近期，对美国和欧洲通胀上升及政府债务的担忧导致债券价格剧烈波动。德国 10 年期国债收益率在 9 月下旬攀升至 3.64 ，为 15 年多以来的最高水平，尽管法国已成为欧元区关注的焦点。

然而，德国新政府的预测显示，能源价格上涨正严重拖累家庭支出。预计今年私人消费仅增长 0.3 ，而 2025. 为 1.3 。政府预计通胀冲击将贯穿整个 2027, 预测明年的平均通胀率为 3 ，高于 2026 的 2.7 。

相反，复苏是由出口和投资驱动的。预计今年投资支出将增加 0.6 ，而出口预计将增长 3.7 ，有助于抵消疲软的家庭消费。

2026 年增长率较高的一部分原因还源于统计效应，这是由于德国统计局近期上调了 2024 和 2025 年的 GDP 预估值。

选择适合您的《金融时报》订阅方案

- 无论身在何处，通过 ft.com 和 FT 应用实时获取值得信赖的全球新闻

• 周一至周六将标志性的 FT 纸质报纸送达您的家中或办公室

• 通过 FTWeekend 享受我们屡获殊荣的生活方式报道

立即订阅：ft.com / subscribetoday

The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

意大利政治

梅洛尼在选票法案上的胜利威胁其连任希望

艾米·卡兹明（AMY KAZMIN）——罗马

在议会批准了一项极具争议的选举制度改革后，意大利总理乔治亚·梅洛尼（Giorgia Meloni）昨日赢得了一场罕见的政治胜利。

在梅洛尼威胁称如果该法案被否决将辞职之后，议员们通过秘密投票，以 227 票对 164 票通过了这项选举法——该法案表面上旨在促进意大利的长期政治稳定。

“赢得选举的人必须能够治理国家，而被选出的人必须向选择他们的选民负责，”梅洛尼在投票后的一篇社交媒体帖子中写道，并补充说新法律将“促进任何政府的稳定性及其议会的一致性，无论其政治色彩如何”。

然而，分析人士表示，她的这次胜利可能是惨胜，因为这可能会使她的三党右翼联盟在计划于明年年底前举行的意大利大选中争取连任的努力变得复杂。

新法律激励各政党在选举前建立大规模联盟，这将迫使梅洛尼做出艰难选择：是与她的极右翼宿敌、前将军罗伯托·万纳奇（Roberto Vannacci）结盟以增强其日益瓦解的联盟的前景，还是冒着被中左翼反对派击败的风险。

“讽刺的是，这部法律是为了帮助她而设计的，但它将给她带来很多麻烦，”萨里大学的政治学家丹尼尔·阿尔贝塔齐（Daniele Albertazzi）表示。“现在她必须绝对决定如何处理万纳奇的问题。她不能等到选举之后，她必须提前决定。”

在正式生效前，该选举制度还可能面临法律障碍，因为民间团体正准备在宪法法院对该法律提出挑战。

这一备受争议的新选举制度——有时被称为“稳定法”（Stabilicum）或“梅洛尼法”（Melonellum）——旨在通过确保选举产生明确的获胜者来结束意大利长期的政治动荡，获胜者的治理能力将通过在议会两院中获得最高 17.5% 的“多数奖金”席位而得到加强。

它取消了简单多数制选区（约占议会席位的三分之一），并将国家转向完全比例代表制，在这种模式下，中右翼往往表现更好。 它还设立了多数奖金席位池，将授予赢得选举的前选举联盟，前提是该联盟必须获得至少 42% 的选票。

为了符合前选举联盟的资格，各政党必须在投票前就共同的总理候选人和政治纲领达成一致——这一要求已经导致中左翼的民主党与其表面上的合作伙伴、民粹主义的五星运动之间产生摩擦。

但随着万纳奇新成立的极右翼“国家未来党”正在侵蚀梅洛尼及其盟友的传统支持基础，除非将他纳入联盟，否则她的联盟将很难达到获得多数奖金所需的最低 42% 门槛。

乔治亚·梅洛尼曾表示，如果改革被否决，她将辞职。

议员们对新法律的其他细节表示不满，这些细节威胁到将大幅提高个人候选人的竞选成本，并将导致女性代表比例大幅下降。

阿尔贝塔齐表示，在今年试图改革司法系统的尝试在宪法全民公投中被否决后，梅洛尼将试图向选民推销这项改革，将其视为一项重大成就。

“她知道这可能会反噬她，但现在太晚了。她非常看重一致性、连贯性以及不反悔的理念，”他补充道。

罗马路易斯大学（Luiss University）的意大利选举制度专家罗伯托·达利蒙特（Roberto D'Alimonte）警告称，该法律可能无法兑现其关于稳定性的承诺。

他表示，如果没有哪个联盟能达到获得多数席位加成所需的 42% 门槛，意大利可能会再次面临政治动荡，因为届时席位将通过比例代表制进行分配。

2026 / 2027 TOP JOB 2026 最佳雇主

意大利 最佳雇主。

德国质量与金融研究所 (ITQF) 在对意大利 400 多家领先企业进行评估后，给予了 De Cecco 100 / 100 的满分。

近两个世纪以来，De Cecco 深知质量决定差异。从最优质的原材料到我们独特的生产方法，卓越始于产品背后的员工。这就是为什么我们将员工置于我们所有工作的核心。

国际

Flydubai恐怖袭击嫌疑人的厌女倾向在其网络谩骂历史中被揭露

在阿拉伯联合酋长国被拘留的副驾驶员还表达了对伊斯兰教的保守解读

CHLOE CORNISH —— 迪拜；CHRIS COOK 和 PETER CAMPBELL —— 伦敦

这名试图劫持飞往特拉维夫航班的 Flydubai 副驾驶员曾是一名加密货币投机者。四年前，他仍与父母同住，并在一个现已停用的社交媒体账号上称女性为“腐肉”。

关于这名阿曼-叙利亚籍飞行员哈曼·阿尔-哈马米（Hamam al-Hammami）的公开信息十分匮乏。外交官表示，阿联酋调查人员严密控制着从审讯这名潜在劫机者中获取的信息，且他的网络足迹已被神秘清除。

但《金融时报》审查了这名当时 25 岁的男子在 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 10 月期间惊人的网络产出，在 Twitter 上的发帖总数超过 3,000 条。尽管他的账号已被删除，但这些帖子在互联网存档中依然可见。

哈马米经常每天发送数十条阿拉伯语推文，与其他用户争吵，提供建议，发表关于营养和健身的看法，并对飞行充满热情，称其为“最安全的交通方式”。

他在网络上经常表现出愤怒，将极保守的伊斯兰教解读与“男性圈”（manosphere）的性别歧视语言融合在一起。后者是一个厌女的在线运动，嘲讽女权主义并推崇性别歧视的性别角色。此外，文中还暗示其持有保守的宗教信仰，哈马米曾表示他不听音乐。

哈马米是如何以及何时被激进化的仍不得而知。

阿联酋审讯人员还在调查哈马米在 9 月 30 日使用应急斧袭击机长并试图控制飞机时，是否为单独行动。阿拉伯联合酋长国表示这是一起恐怖袭击。据知情人士透露，以色列调查人员坚信哈马米是一名“独狼”。

但这种坚持未能平息以色列国内的愤怒，批评者称这是系统性的安全失败。媒体报道称，哈马米此前曾被其前雇主阿曼航空（Oman Air）标记为持有激进观点，并被降职从事文职工作。

这名副驾驶员曾在中东多个国家生活。根据哈马米的推文，他的阿曼籍父亲于 1993 年与他的母亲结婚，后者是来自叙利亚南部的沙马尔（Shamar）部落成员。哈马米在推文中写道，母亲“在宗教、道德和美德中抚养我们长大”。

一名知情人士表示，他在 2011 年——即阿拉伯之春点燃该地区的那一年——移居叙利亚。随后，这名青少年在该国生活了四年，当时该国正陷入内战，这场冲突催生并维持了大量伊斯兰激进武装组织。

空中惊魂：9 月 30 日在以色列本古里安机场遭遇劫机企图的 Flydubai 客机。下方为哈曼·阿尔-哈马米。Ammar Awad / 路透社；

哈马米在 2015 年至 2017 年期间在澳大利亚学习航空，他称期间曾寄宿在两个当地家庭中，但并未毕业。据新西兰官员称，在 2018 年至 2019 年期间，他在全球两大飞行员培训中心之一的新西兰的一所飞行学校学习了六个月，该学校随后被一家英国公司收购。

据知情人士透露，哈马米曾参加过一所英国大学的在线课程，但他从未进入英国。哈马米的一条推文提到他的兄弟在英国留学。

他在推文中写道，在西方的五年是其“宗教信仰的黄金岁月”，尽管他表示在返回中东后，他的信仰实践有所减弱。

《金融时报》将他在 Twitter 账号中提到的细节与其个人履历以及他在 LinkedIn 上的资料（现也已删除）进行了比对。

据两名知情人士透露，调查人员在审查哈马米（Hammami）的私人在线搜索历史时发现，他在澳大利亚生活期间曾访问过极端伊斯兰主义内容。哈马米并未在国外完成飞行员资格认证，而是返回阿曼并在该国国有航空公司找到了一份工作，他在推特上称这一举动是“我做过的最正确的决定”。阿曼航空（Oman Air）未就其在该公司的雇佣情况回应置评请求。

2019年左右，哈马米开始从事现货交易和加密货币投机，他后来将这一错误归咎于受到“魔鬼”的诱惑。他的投资以失败告终，他表示自己损失了“120,000”——虽然他没有指明币种，但如果是以阿曼里亚尔计算，损失将超过$300,000。

到2022年，25岁的哈马米与身为律师的父亲和身为家庭主妇的母亲一起住在阿曼首都马斯喀特的一个高档社区。“只要我还没结婚，我就不敢想搬出家门，”他在推特上写道。哈马米于2021年下旬加入推特（现已更名为X），并极力寻求通过相亲结婚。“我25岁了，我想今天就结婚，不能等到明天！”他在2022年1月发推称。

他规定，对方必须是一位18至23岁、来自部落背景、虔诚的沙特女性，需佩戴遮面面纱（niqab），并同意不在家以外的地方工作，且愿意在国外生活。他说，他使用穆斯林在线相亲平台没有成功，但他已深信大多数女性“主要关心钱”且“擅长伪装”。

他的帖子经常唤起针对女性的暴力，并使用贬义的性侮辱词汇。“她唯一的义务就是张开双腿，”他写道。在讨论一名因在网上发布照片产生争执而寻求离婚的女性时，他说：“她需要被狠狠地教训一顿。”

哈马米在谩骂中充斥着“男性圈”（manosphere）的语言，反复使用诸如“simp”（指过于讨好女性的男人）或用来称赞强者的绰号“Alpha”等词汇，并与推广性别歧视意识形态的账号互动。

尽管对女性充满敌意，哈马米仍吹嘘自己收到的追求。他在2022年1月写道：“我这辈子从未碰过女孩，尽管我发誓我有许多机会……上帝保护我们免受诱惑，”他补充道，并表示他不会“追逐廉价、腐烂的肉体”。

该图像仅包含一条装饰性的水平线，根据规则必须忽略。根据规则 2，此类线条必须被忽略，且不得在 OCR 输出中用下划线或任何其他字符表示。

因此，修正后的 OCR 文本为：

[空字符串]

（由在贝鲁特的 Malaika Kanaaneh Tapper 以及在耶路撒冷的 James Shotter 和 Neri Zilber 共同报道）

该图像仅包含一条装饰性的水平线，必须根据规则 2 忽略。不应输出任何文本或占位符字符。

沙特阿拉伯

胡塞武装袭击机场导致利雅得大量航班取消

艾哈迈德·阿尔-奥姆兰（AHMED AL OMRAN）——吉达 彼得·坎贝尔（PETER CAMPBELL）——伦敦

随着沙特阿拉伯与受伊朗支持的叛军之间的冲突继续升级，在胡塞武装表示其使用弹道导弹袭击该国首都机场后，昨日从利雅得起飞的航班中有 100 多个被取消。

居民报告称，昨日上午在市内听到了巨大的爆炸声，胡塞武装声称使用一枚弹道导弹袭击了主要的卡利德国王国际机场。

沙特当局尚未对此予以确认，而由沙特领导的、与该叛军组织作战的联军表示，已在首都上空拦截了两枚导弹。

包括汉莎航空和印度航空在内的航空公司表示，将暂停往返利雅得的航班数日。Cirium 的数据显示，截至下午三点左右，已有 188 个航班被取消，占当日航班服务的 40% 以上。

Cirium 表示，包括吉达和达曼在内的其他沙特机场也有大量航班被取消。卡利德国王机场表示，乘客在前往机场前应直接联系其航空公司以确认航班状态。

美国驻利雅得大使馆表示，在沙特阿拉伯工作的美国政府雇员现在使用该机场需要“特别授权”，并且由于“安全风险”，他们应远离与也门接壤的边境。沙特民航局未立即回应置评请求。

沙特民防官员表示，拦截弹道导弹产生的碎片导致一家医疗诊所综合体和一家幼儿园受损。

此次航班中断发生之际，沙特阿拉伯正准备举办重大活动，包括下周的世界石油大会，以及随后在 10 月 26 日至 29 日举行的未来投资倡议会议——这是其年度旗舰活动，吸引了来自全球的高管、投资者和银行家。

在此次袭击之前，该王国曾表示，本周早些时候胡塞武装对包括利雅得在内的沙特机场发起的袭击造成 3 人死亡，数十人受伤。沙特航空当局表示，周三在卡利德国王机场的一次袭击中，一名苏丹男子死亡，另有 7 人受伤。周二在西南部的阿布哈机场的一次袭击中，两名女性死亡，30 人受伤。

根据该组织发言人亚希亚·萨雷（Yahya Saree）准将的一份声明，这些袭击由受伊朗支持的胡塞武装认领，他们警告国际航空公司，将继续针对沙特领空发动袭击。

据政府关联的萨巴（Saba）国家通讯社报道，也门武装部队昨日表示，已针对胡塞武装开展了 2,103 次“精准打击行动”。

另外，唐纳德·特朗普表示，美国在期中选举前不会袭击伊朗，并昨日在其 Truth Social 平台上补充称，华盛顿和德黑兰正在进行“富有成效的讨论”。

袭击平民

访问北京

俄罗斯在乌克兰公交站实施炸弹袭击造成数十人死亡

克里斯托弗·米勒（CHRISTOPHER MILLER）——基辅

昨日，一枚俄罗斯滑翔炸弹袭击了东部城市克拉马托尔斯克的一个公交站，造成数十名乌克兰人死亡。这是近几个月来针对平民最严重的袭击事件之一。

据乌克兰国家紧急服务局称，炸弹在高峰时段击中了两辆巴士，造成至少 30 人死亡，18 人受伤。当局表示，附近另一起袭击造成另外三人死亡。

总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基表示：“由于伤势严重，部分遇难者仍未被确认身份。”他指出，许多伤者正在与死神搏斗，并警告死亡人数可能会上升。

在上周接受《金融时报》采访时，泽连斯基曾提到，俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京已指示其将领在乌克兰战场上放弃所有战争规则。根据国际法，蓄意攻击平民被视为战争罪。

自 2022 年全面入侵以来，俄罗斯一直使用航空炸弹，从前线后方发射，以摧毁整栋建筑。

乌克兰议会人权专员德米特罗·卢比内茨（Dmytro Lubinets）在 X 上写道：“俄罗斯正在系统性地摧毁克拉马托尔斯克并恐吓平民。”地区州长瓦迪姆·菲拉什金（Vadym Filashkin）在 Telegram 上表示，受害者“并非‘战争的后果’，也不是枯燥的统计数据。他们是被俄罗斯军队杀害的人”。

他表示，由于俄罗斯袭击的威胁，克拉马托尔斯克及邻近城市斯洛维扬斯克（Slovyansk）的公共交通已暂停运行。

受害者并非战争后果“亦非枯燥统计数据。他们是被俄罗斯军队杀害的人”

在这次公交站爆炸袭击的前一天，俄罗斯的一波导弹和无人机袭击在乌克兰全境造成至少 28 人死亡，其中 22 人死于对普里卢基（Pryluky）一栋公寓楼的袭击，该地位于基辅以东约 150 公里处。

该建筑被俄罗斯导弹直接命中，居民被埋在碎片之下。救援人员救出了数十名伤员，以及四名儿童的冰冷尸体。基辅市长维塔利·克利奇科（Vitali Klitschko）表示，周三的袭击在基辅造成三人死亡。

过去一天半时间内，俄罗斯袭击造成的累计死亡人数已上升至至少 64 人。

昨日，随着俄罗斯无人机袭击引发的爆炸以及乌克兰防空拦截震动城市建筑，基辅全市响起了防空警报。

乌克兰最大的能源运营商 DTEK 表示，在俄罗斯连续 2 天袭击其能源设施后，该公司已在基辅及其周边地区实施限电。

泽连斯基告诉《金融时报》，普京增加对平民的袭击，是因为俄罗斯军队未能实现其在战场上的军事目标。

据追踪战争的军事分析人士称，乌克兰军队近几周在顿巴斯东部前线取得了进展，挫败了俄罗斯试图包围克拉马托尔斯克及构成乌克兰“堡垒带”的周边城市的企图。

总部位于芬兰的 Black Bird Group 上周报告称：“在 9 月份，俄罗斯的净增益为负 190 平方公里。这是自 2023 年 6 月以来，我们数据集记录的俄罗斯单月最大净领土损失。”

泽连斯基上周表示，乌克兰的反攻行动 Operation Vivaldi 已解放了 125-140 平方公里的领土。

欧盟特使将就贸易逆差问题向中国施压

爱德华·怀特（EDWARD WHITE）——上海，安迪·邦兹（ANDY BOUNDS）——布鲁塞尔

欧盟最高贸易特使已抵达北京，与中国进行高层会谈。欧盟敦促这个全球制造强国采取具体措施，以减少其不断膨胀的贸易盈余。

欧盟委员马罗什·谢夫乔维奇（Maroš Šefčovič）昨日抵达中国首都，开启为期两天的行程。双方将尝试缓解贸易紧张局势，行程包括与中国商务部部长王文涛举行会晤。

此次会谈的背景是，许多欧洲国家首都的愤怒情绪日益高涨，认为北京在解决贸易盈余问题上做得不够，目前该盈余已膨胀至每天 10亿欧元。

欧洲官员将欧盟内部数万个制造业岗位的流失归咎于低成本中国出口商品的涌入。谢夫乔维奇此前曾表示，中国不仅威胁到欧洲的工业，还威胁到其社会模式。

在会谈之前，《金融时报》报道称，中国拒绝了欧盟限制出口插电式混合动力电动汽车的请求。在针对中国纯电动汽车征收关税后，此类车辆的出货量大幅激增。

欧洲官员警告称，如果混合动力汽车问题得不到解决，北京会谈将以失败告终。这为两大经济体之间贸易关系的潜在快速恶化埋下了伏笔。

尽管北京拒绝削减出口，但似乎提出扩大在欧直接投资，同时允许增加来自欧盟的进口。

中国还对就电动汽车出口最低价格进行谈判持开放态度，以换取取消最高 35 per cent 的反补贴关税。

然而，此类提议被认为不足以令欧洲官员满意。欧洲官员正向北京施压，要求其取消部分关税，以便欧盟出口产品能更容易地与中国国内生产商竞争。而中国则希望欧盟取消对技术出口的限制，包括来自荷兰 ASML 的芯片制造设备。

贸易僵局：北京拒绝削减混合动力汽车出口

中国官员还多次警告，对于任何进一步限制中国公司或产品的行为，可能会采取强力回应。北京的报复手段包括可能限制关键矿产出口，或征收自身的关税。

商务部上周表示：“中国将采取坚决措施，维护中国产业的合法权益。”

德国和法国本周致信欧盟委员会主席乌尔苏拉·冯德莱恩（Ursula von der Leyen），建议建立一种最后手段的贸易工具，在必要时有权切断中国进入欧盟单一市场的渠道。

这两个国家在信中写道，采取更严厉的措施是为了应对日益增加的“贸易武器化、系统性市场扭曲行为以及全球宏观经济失衡”。

中国官方媒体则认为，在双方进行谈判期间，欧盟使用“针对中国的单边工具”已经“侵蚀了欧盟对话的诚意”。

FTWeekend

秋季设计特辑：新遗产

滑雪特辑：哥斯拉级厄尔尼诺、法国的秘密山谷以及最佳新雪酒店

汉娜·阿伦特以及为何友谊比真理更重要

一个新的罗马帝国

与《金融时报》共进午餐：计算机科学家大卫·西尔弗（David Silver）

本周末请购买纸质版或在 ft.com / subscribe 在线订阅 [EMPTY]

INTERNATIONAL

签证打击

美国禁止科技行业外国员工担保

白宫限制移民的最新举措

乔·米勒 (JOE MILLER) 和 艾拉·李 (ELLA LEE) 华盛顿

拉夫·罗斯纳-乌丁 (RAFE ROSNER-UDDIN) — 旧金山 特朗普政府已暂时禁止微软、Adobe 及其他几家科技公司为员工担保申请美国永久居留权，称这些公司滥用了移民计划，损害了美国公民的利益。

“不幸的是，在美国没有任何 1 家公司比微软更滥用这一制度，”副总统 JD Vance 昨日表示。

他声称，针对高技能外国员工的 H-1B 签证计划“已充斥着欺诈”，且过度依赖此类计划“是对美国工人及美国生活方式的根本侮辱”。

另外六家 IT 外包公司——包括 Cognizant、Infosys、Tata、Wipro、HCL 和 Capgemini——也被暂停参与永久劳工认证计划（Permanent Labor Certification programme），该计划允许美国雇主雇用外国员工。

政府还宣布，已针对九所大学使用 J-1 学生签证的情况启动欺诈调查，这些大学包括：匹兹堡大学、耶鲁大学、哈佛大学、斯坦福大学、布朗大学、加州大学戴维斯分校、加州理工学院、亚利桑那州立大学和麻省理工学院。

“传票已经送达；调查正在进行中，没有人能因为自己的名字刻在昂贵的建筑上就获得特权，”监察长安东尼·德埃斯波西托 (Anthony D'Esposito) 表示。

Adobe 和其他被点名的 IT 公司未立即回应置评请求。微软表示，其美国员工的“绝大多数”是美国人。该公司补充道：“我们期待向政府提供进一步的信息。”

特朗普政府此前曾针对 H-1B 签证采取行动，该签证被科技公司和专业行业广泛使用。

去年，白宫试图对新申请征收 $100,000 的费用，但这一涨价举措被联邦法院拦截。今年 6 月，法官利奥·索罗金 (Leo Sorokin) 裁定该费用等同于未经授权的税收，且侵犯了国会筹集资金的权力。

特朗普政府已对该裁决提出上诉，目前联邦上诉法院正在审理中。在提高费用之前，美国政府收取的 H-1B 签证抽签注册费为 $215，雇主担保申请人需额外支付 $780。去年有超过 400,000 份此类签证获得批准。

亚马逊是 H-1B 签证的最大接收方，但在 Vance 昨天的评论中未被提及。

特朗普政府原定在昨日的另一场活动中表彰微软首席执行官萨蒂亚·纳德拉 (Satya Nadella)，并授予其国家技术与创新奖章。但 Vance 表示，这两项公告之间并不矛盾。

亚洲。母亲的“惩罚”

中国女性通过代孕规避生育

中介机构与咨询公司正将潜在父母与海外服务对接

ELEANOR OLCOTT — 北京

对于25岁的中国创业者Kitty Sheng来说，怀孕在身体和职业上带来的代价似乎太高，以至于她宁愿通过海外代孕来生孩子。

这位来自杭州的美容创业者表示，怀孕将“影响我的工作和外貌”。她详细计划明年前往东欧的格鲁吉亚寻找代孕母亲。

她说：“如果我保持单身，我必须独自承担怀孕和产后恢复的所有成本，这与通过代孕生孩子的成本其实没有太大区别。”

由于代孕在中国是非法的，一个由中介、顾问和生育诊所组成的产业随之出现，旨在将客户与愿意为其孕育孩子的海外女性联系起来。虽然没有关于中国父母通过代孕出生的孩子数量的准确数据，但最近的一项研究显示，在美国寻求代孕的潜在父母中，近三分之一是国际客户，而其中约40%来自中国。

FT采访的顾问、客户和医生表示，早期的需求主要来自难以生育的夫妇。但现在，身体条件允许怀孕但不愿接受怀孕对身体和职业影响的年轻女性，对此表现出越来越浓厚的兴趣。

常驻纽约的中国女性权利活动人士Lu Pin表示：“‘母亲惩罚’在中国长期存在。这种恐惧是有根据的，它是公共和私人生活中环境不利于女性的产物。”

富裕的中国人倾向于选择美国进行代孕，因为那里拥有先进的医疗设施、对父母强大的法律保护，以及孩子获得美国护照的前景。费用可能高达$300,000。

美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在8月发布的一项行政命令中，试图阻止通过代孕出生的外国父母的孩子拥有出生公民权，此前他限制该权利的首次尝试被最高法院否决。

其他目的地包括格鲁吉亚和吉尔吉斯斯坦，那里的套餐费用低至$63,000。

河北省石家庄市一健身课上的孕妇。中国去年的出生人数创下有记录以来的最低水平 Liang Zidong / VCG / Getty

专家表示，对代孕的需求暗示了女性犹豫生育的深层文化和职业原因。中国去年登记的出生人数创下有记录以来的最低水平，标志着人口连续第四年下降。

人口统计学家估计，2024年女性生育第一个孩子的平均年龄为28.6岁，高于2006年的24.3岁。富裕城市的女性比农村女性更晚生育，上海的平均年龄为31.8岁。

专家还描述了来自不愿接受身体和职业影响的年轻女性的增长需求。

北京一家专门从事生育治疗的医院的中医医生Xiao Yi表示，她观察到“害怕怀孕和分娩的患者数量有非常明显的增加”。

“中国女性担心这会如何影响她们的外貌，以及她们是否能恢复到正常的体重和子宫健康，”她说。几位就不愿怀孕与FT交谈的女性也表达了同样的担忧。

一家总部位于加利福尼亚州的领先生育机构的销售人员描述了来自单身男女咨询数量的增加。该人士表示：“他们可能不想进入婚姻，但仍然希望成为母亲和父亲。”

对于一些中国年轻人来说，这一决定还得到了父母的支持。几位接受《金融时报》采访的人士表示，他们的父母主动提出支付代孕费用，将其视为在子女不愿结婚或不愿亲自怀孕的情况下，确保能有孙辈的一种方式。

这种交易反映了祖父母在中国抚养孩子过程中已经扮演的重要角色。祖父母经常会与成年子女同住，或承担大部分日常育儿工作。

一对来自北京、不愿透露姓名的金融从业夫妇表示，他们是朋友圈中第一对在美国寻求代孕的人。“越来越多地朋友在经历这个过程，”丈夫说道。

这对夫妇选择代孕是因为妻子不愿经历怀孕和分娩。“我不想生孩子。这对身体和健康是一种风险，而且你会听到很多关于女性分娩副作用的疯狂故事，”她说道。

对于盛（Sheng）来说，使用代孕的逻辑是不容置疑的。“无论是我的事业处于增长阶段，还是我在意自己的外貌，亦或是我不愿意结婚——这些都是我个人的考量，”她说道。

住房市场

美国抵押贷款利率攀升至三年来最高水平

ZEHRA MUNIR — 纽约

美国抵押贷款利率已触及 2023 年以来的最高水平，在距离中期选举仅剩一个月之际，进一步削弱了住房负担能力。

房地美（Freddie Mac）昨日公布的数据显示，截至昨日，30 年期固定抵押贷款利率平均为 7.4%，较一周前上涨 0.12 个百分点。

抵押贷款利率已连续七周上涨，为三年来最长的一次上涨周期，在此期间借贷成本增加了 0.84 个百分点。利率目前处于 2023 年 11 月初以来的最高点。

近期利率的攀升是由美国总统唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）对伊朗发起的战争所带来的通胀压力，以及市场预期美联储将继续提高利率以降低物价，从而推高了国债收益率。

对于在中期选举中努力维持参众两院控制权的共和党人来说，抵押贷款利率的上涨是一个令人不安的因素。

美联储在 9 月份时隔三年首次提高了基准联邦基金利率，旨在防止能源价格的飙升演变成更广泛的通胀危机。

交易员认为，该央行在本月（即选举前几天）的会议上加息的可能性仅为 20%，但认为到年底为止，美联储至少加息一次的可能性为 76%。

在 2022 年 9 月以来，30 年期抵押贷款利率在 2 月下旬首次跌破 6%，就在美国和以色列对伊朗发动袭击的前几天。

自冲突开始以来，该利率已上涨 1.4 个百分点。

这导致过去几个月住房市场的情绪日益低迷，建筑成本上升，而潜在卖家则在等待利率回落。

Realtor.com 高级经济学家汉娜·琼斯（Hannah Jones）表示：“面对持续的负担能力挑战，买家正在退缩，而卖家则表现出一定的灵活性。”

琼斯指出，上个月约有五分之一的房源下调了价格，这是四年来的最高比例。库存和待处理房屋销售同样疲软。

琼斯说：“总而言之，9 月份的住房数据表明，市场因日益增加的压力而陷入停滞。买家在较低的价格区间有更多选择，但高企的抵押贷款利率使许多人无法实现购房目标。”

Realtor.com 表示，上个月约有五分之一的房源下调了价格

加拿大作家

卡森获诺贝尔文学奖

MARIA CRAWFORD 和 CONSTANCE AYRTON

以形式创新且跨越体裁的诗歌、散文和翻译创作著称的加拿大作家安妮·卡森（Anne Carson）荣获 2026 年诺贝尔文学奖。

诺贝尔委员会昨日表示，76 岁的卡森因其“大胆且富有创造力的作品，在与古典传统的俏皮对话中，为当代文学创造了新形式”而获此奖项。

卡森 1950 年出生于多伦多，自 1986 年以来，她在加拿大和美国的大学任教期间发表了数十部诗歌、翻译和文学非虚构作品。她的古希腊语翻译作品包括萨福（Sappho）、索福克勒斯（Sophocles）和欧里庇得斯（Euripides）的作品。但正是她将古典与极具现代感的内容交织在一起，使其赢得了国际评论界的赞誉。

诺贝尔文学委员会主席安德斯·奥尔森（Anders Olsson）赞扬了卡森“俏皮且带有讽刺意味的作品，不仅在古典诗歌与现代诗歌之间穿梭，还在不同体裁和艺术形式之间转换”。奥尔森补充道，她与视觉艺术家、编舞师、歌剧和戏剧导演的合作——包括由伊沃·范·霍夫（Ivo van Hove）执导的索福克勒斯剧作《安提戈涅》的改编版——赋予了她的写作一种“强烈的表演特质”。

重点推介《红色自传》（Autobiography of Red）

“她确实是一位属于我们时代的作家。没有人像她那样写作，也没有人敢以这种方式创作”

在 1998 年出版的、被广泛翻译的诗体小说中，卡森将赫拉克勒斯的神话与现代青少年单相思的经历相结合。奥尔森表示，这位作者拥有“一种非凡的能力，能让古典文学传统呈现出强烈的当代感”。

卡森作品中的形式与并置体现了她对文学风格和人物的幽默感与好奇心。在《漂浮》（Float，2016年）中，她的诗句被印在 20 多本小册子上，采用模块化的书籍结构，读者可以根据意愿随意打开和重新排序。《金融时报》的评论员称，该合集中的诗歌“直面秩序的虚构，并质疑记忆的线性”。

在获得 T.S. 艾略特奖的《丈夫之美》（The Beauty of the Husband，2001年）中，一段注定失败的婚姻中的背叛与痛苦，被约翰·基茨的浪漫诗篇讽刺性地穿插其中。

该文学奖项包含 1200 万瑞典克朗（90 万英镑）的奖金，是连续工作日公布的六项年度诺贝尔奖中的第四项。和平奖和经济学奖的获奖者将于今天和周一公布。

瑞典学院常任秘书英格丽德·卡尔伯格在通过电话联系到卡森几分钟后宣布了这一消息。卡森对此“感到非常惊讶”，当时她“在冰岛，听着风声”。

委员会成员史蒂夫·塞姆-桑德伯格表示：“她确实是一位属于我们时代的作家。没有人像她那样写作，也没有人敢以这种方式创作。”

游说者

塞族共和国与特朗普办公厅主任的关联

艾米·麦金农（AMY MACKINNON）——波托查里（POTOČARI）

唐纳德·特朗普的办公厅主任苏西·怀尔斯（Susie Wiles）之女目前就职于一家美国游说公司，该公司签署了一份每月 35,000 加元的合同，代表塞族共和国（Republika Srpska）。这个巴尔干实体目前正处于白宫内部一场关于利益冲突的新争端中心。

根据联邦申报文件，凯蒂·怀尔斯（Katie Wiles）是 Continental Strategy 公司的合伙人，该公司于 2 月签署了为波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那境内该自治实体进行游说的合同。

该公司表示，她曾因另一份合同访问过塞族共和国，并补充称她并未代表该飞地向美国官员进行游说。

根据泽利卡·茨维亚诺维奇（Željka Cvijanović）社交媒体账号发布的一条帖子，苏西·怀尔斯在 9 月会见了波黑三方总统团中的塞族成员茨维亚诺维奇。茨维亚诺维奇在关于这次会面的文字中写道：“今天很荣幸在白宫与美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的办公厅主任及其最亲密合作者苏西·怀尔斯讨论[波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那]及该地区的情况。”此次会面发生在波黑选举前数周。

一名白宫官员表示，请求苏西·怀尔斯会见茨维亚诺维奇的人是亚历克斯·加西亚（Alex Garcia），他是 Continental Strategy 的合伙人，曾担任特朗普 2024 年总统竞选活动的副政治总监。

该官员表示，苏西·怀尔斯没有与她的女儿讨论工作事宜。

Continental Strategy 表示，加西亚已注册为塞族共和国的游说人员，并在 10 月 4 日选举期间身处该地区。该公司称，加西亚是公司内部唯一一名就塞族共和国问题与美国政府互动的人员。

该公司表示，凯蒂·怀尔斯于 8 月中旬代表一家在当地进行可行性研究的美国公司访问了该飞地。怀尔斯为该公司提供沟通支持，但从未就塞族共和国问题与任何美国政府官员交谈。

这些披露可能会引发人们对特朗普核心圈成员代表塞族共和国进行游说关系的进一步质疑。

周二，《纽约时报》报道称，特朗普的长期助手克里斯·拉西维塔（Chris LaCivita）和詹姆斯·布莱尔（James Blair）在上周日选举前，因向该塞族占多数的实体提供选举建议而获得了数十万加元的报酬。

特朗普随后与他的前竞选经理拉西维塔，以及直到最近还担任白宫办公厅副主任的布莱尔撇清了关系。

慕尼黑制造：宝马（BMW）押注其能在德国制造“未来的汽车”，而国内竞争对手则将产能转移至海外 ➕ 第 11 页

公司与市场

Kirkland 停止为律所排名提供财务数据

• 退出 AmLaw 调查
• 数据对客户而言不再“有意义”

奥利弗·巴恩斯（OLIVER BARNES）——纽约

柯克兰与艾利斯律师事务所（Kirkland & Ellis）将停止向法律行业利润与营收的旗舰排名提供财务数据，认为披露结果已不再“合适或必要”。

这家全球营收最高的律师事务所告诉行业杂志《美国律师》（The American Lawyer）——该杂志数十年来一直依赖律所自愿提供财务数据进行排名——其将不再分享相关信息。

作为一家美国私人合伙企业，Kirkland 在其他地方不披露全球数据，不过其英国业务向英国公司注册处（Companies House）提交账目。

在发给 AmLaw 且被《金融时报》获取的一封信函中，该公司表示披露

总部位于芝加哥的 Kirkland 已成长为营收规模最大的律师事务所 —— AmLaw 记录了其崛起过程

披露该信息并未给其客户提供“实质性价值”，且将其纳入排名“可能会激励量化指标而非定性优势”。

Kirkland 的律师通过一份全公司邮件被告知了这一决定。

与此同时，顶尖律师的薪酬大幅飙升，最成功者每年可赚取数千万加元 —— 这可能会激怒部分客户，因为其中许多客户的收入低于他们雇佣的律师。

AmLaw 告诉《金融时报》，其排名将继续提供可靠的市场概况。该刊物在一份声明中表示：“在每个阶段，包括律所拒绝参与调查的罕见情况，我们都采用与我们屡获殊荣的新闻报道相同的严谨报告方法 —— 与我们报道和服务的组织进行深入接触，开展独立研究，并与知识渊博且值得信赖的市场来源保持深厚联系。”

拒绝置评。

总部位于芝加哥的 已成长为营收规模最大的律师事务所 —— AmLaw 记录了其快速崛起。其决定可能会鼓励竞争对手采取同样步骤，此举将进一步削弱人们对这个日益获利但缺乏透明度的经济部门财务表现的可见度。

2025 年的披露数据显示，其营收创纪录地达到 106亿美元，高于前一年的 88亿美元。分享利润的律所权益合伙人平均获得 $11.1mn，比 2024 年增长了 20%。

据一名接近该律所的人士透露， 的执行委员会多年来一直在考虑向 AmLaw 隐瞒财务业绩数据。该人士补充道， 的领导层对 AmLaw 衡量权益合伙人平均利润的指标感到不满，因为该指标未能考虑到律所内部薪酬的巨大差异。

这是大型律师事务所为了掩盖财务业绩细节而采取的最新举措。Freshfields 在 2023, 年（当时人均合伙人平均利润为 £2.09mn）宣布，将不再自愿报告其财务结果。

Freshfields 的全球管理合伙人 Rick van Aerssen 当时表示，其进步不应基于数字，而应“基于我们建立的业务质量以及我们赢得的客户委托”。

然而，该律所仍被要求在英国公司注册处（Companies House）公布账目，因此其部分指标是公开的。

纽约律所 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 和伦敦律所 Slaughter and May 也不与 AmLaw 分享结果，后者转而对其数据进行估算。

地标性交易：Tishman Speyer及其合作伙伴达成收购纽约克莱斯勒大厦协议

这笔价值$235mn的大厦交易正值纽约豪华办公空间需求激增之际 —— Gary Hershorn / Getty Images

ZEHRA MUNIR —— 纽约

随着纽约市对豪华办公空间的需求激增，纽约最具标志性的摩天大楼之一——克莱斯勒大厦（Chrysler Building）正被收购并升级。

这座大厦近一个世纪以来一直是纽约市天际线的固定标志，但此前已陷入失修状态，入驻率不足50%。

商业地产公司Tishman Speyer及其投资合作伙伴已与私立学院库珀联盟（Cooper Union）达成一项协议。库珀联盟一直拥有该大厦所在的土地，交易金额为$235mn，此外还包括土地租赁费用。

这座地标建筑较低的成交价格反映了其目前的状况。2008, 阿布扎比政府以$800mn买入该大厦90%的股份；仅在十多年后，它便以仅$150mn的价格被出售给房地产公司Signa和RFR。

这一数字也反映了库珀联盟向土地租赁持有者收取的租金在不断攀升。

目前的租金尚未披露，但在2018年，年租金从$7.75mn上涨至$32.5mn。

Tishman Speyer首席执行官罗布·斯派尔（Rob Speyer）表示：“在曼哈顿办公市场处于历史强劲时期的时刻，我们正为克莱斯勒大厦执行一项雄心勃勃的计划。”

斯派尔的公司计划修复这座位于中城、曾出现在《蜘蛛侠》和《黑衣人3》等电影中的77层建筑。与此同时，其周边邻近建筑已从金融机构和律师事务所租户那里获得了昂贵的租赁合同。

这座装饰艺术风格（Art Deco）的塔楼距离大中央车站（Grand Central station）步行不足五分钟。随着企业试图缩短员工的通勤时间，该区域已出现复苏。由于几街之隔的新摩根大通（JPMorgan Chase）总部落成，进一步推高了豪华办公空间的标准，推动了该地区的复兴。

Tishman Speyer在的一份声明中表示：“对于寻求直接位于大中央车站上方、且具备高质量及配套设施环境的公司来说，克莱斯勒大厦进入了一个几乎没有替代方案的市场。”

这座大厦建于近100年前，最初用于安置克莱斯勒公司。它曾一度成为全球最高建筑，随后将此头衔让给了帝国大厦。同时拥有并运营洛克菲勒中心（Rockefeller Center）的Tishman Speyer将修复其外立面，并对其顶部的皇冠部分进行抛光和翻新。

根据经纪公司JLL和CBRE的数据，去年曼哈顿单价在$100或以上的办公空间签署租赁合同的数量创下历史新高。

根据Colliers的一份报告，曼哈顿今年的办公租赁总量为32.9mn sq ft，是自2000,（当时记录为40.1mn sq ft）以来表现最强劲的一年。

高盛计划向高管支付$500mn奖金

西蒙·福伊 (SIMON FOY) 和 奥滕卡·阿里亚伊 (ORTENCA ALIAJ) —— 伦敦 约书亚·富兰克林 (JOSHUA FRANKLIN) —— 纽约

高盛最资深的高管们有望根据一项五年激励计划获得超过$500mn的特别奖金，这将是这家华尔街银行历史上规模最大的此类派发之一。

据一名知情人士透露，该贷款机构正准备向一组最资深的领导者发放股权奖励，按目前的股价计算，总额将超过$500mn。

另一位人士表示，此次派发是该行在2021,披露的一项长期激励计划的一部分，奖金池的最终价值将根据该行在10月底相对于同行在股市上的表现而定，这意味着金额仍可能发生变化。

这一巨额方案最早由彭博社报道，此前高盛的股价在过去五年中优于大多数华尔街竞争对手。该特别激励计划是在华尔街银行受益于创纪录的交易活动以及“空白支票”公司热潮、行业从新冠疫情中复苏期间达成的。

高盛首席执行官大卫·所罗门 (David Solomon) 预计将获得奖金池中最大的一块，其获得的股票奖励约为$100mn。

他的副手约翰·沃尔德伦 (John Waldron) 也是该计划的受益者之一，此外还包括2021年起高盛管理委员会中目前仍在职的其他成员。

在高盛于2021年宣布该计划时，所罗门的绩效股票价值约为$30mn，而沃尔德伦的价值约为$20mn。

所罗门和担任高盛总裁兼首席运营官的沃尔德伦自2018.起领导这家投资银行。两人在2025.年初还分别获得了价值$80mn的五年留任奖金。高盛去年向所罗门支付了$47mn，比前一年增加了五分之一以上。

他在任期的前半段因进军零售银行业导致亏损而受挫，但在经历了数十亿加元的损失后，高盛基本退出了消费者业务，此后加倍投入投资银行、交易和资金管理。该行的股价在过去三年中上涨了约180%。

随着开发竞赛升温，科技巨头纷纷推介 AI 智能体

商业洞察 技术 Richard Waters

在 iPhone 问世之前的几年里，科技界普遍认为移动互联网接入将是下一个重大趋势。

但在苹果公司指明方向之前，经历了从 Windows Mobile 到诺基亚 Symbian 操作系统等多次失败的尝试，而苹果在这一过程中重新设定了大部分科技行业的发展方向。

现在，AI 智能体（AI agents）的开发似乎也在发生类似的情况。许多科技领袖认为，能够代表用户采取行动、消除常规工作和个人任务中枯燥部分的软件，代表着一个巨大的机遇。

但这种形式具体将如何呈现尚不明确。找到正确方案的回报可能是巨大的——个人智能体可能会成为进入数字世界的新入口，并使其创造者成为下一个“把关人”。

到目前为止，这些产品包括 Meta 的 Muse 和 OpenAI 的 dots；与此同时，微软对其 Copilot 助手进行了重新设计，使其能够更自主地运行；苹果在其最新的 iOSG 中为 Siri 助手增加了智能体功能；谷歌则在 Gemini 中推出了一个新的工作助手。几家初创公司也在争取关注，其中最著名的是 Instinct，该公司在夏季启动了仅限邀请的测试。

Meta 的 Muse 与 OpenAI 的 dots 之间的对比表明，双方对智能体的愿景相差甚远。两者都采用了可爱的吉祥物，且都来自拥有大量用户的团队，但其意图截然不同。

Meta 将其智能体推介为处理各类日常任务的工具。

相比之下，OpenAI 首席执行官萨姆·奥尔特曼（Sam Altman）则认为这类事情几乎不值得该公司关注，他转而强调那些通常会交给“具有高度自主权的工程师或幕僚长”处理的复杂工作任务。

其他公司的智能体通常处于两者之间。

在某种程度上，这种定位既反映了相关企业的商业模式，也预示了智能体 AI 可能产生最直接影响的领域。

人们需要学习全新的数字习惯。而其中的核心将是建立信任。

对于 Muse 而言，这意味着将 Meta 的广告业务扩展到采取一个

正如微软两年前所展示的那样，当时一项旨在记录用户在电脑上所有操作的 AI 功能引发了关于隐私的强烈抗议，因此新功能的处理需要格外谨慎。

产品设计核心的问题在于，公司在多大程度上需要展示其新智能体的功能，而不是仅仅让用户自行摸索。

行业领先集团接连推出新服务，新服务的部署已进入快车道

从其代理程序发起的交易中抽取佣金，从而使自身在电子商务中处于更核心的地位。这可能是一个艰难的演进过程。

Muse 采取的是“引导式”方法，不断向用户提供操作建议；而 OpenAI 则更多地保持一种“空白画布”的状态。微软最新的 Copilot 提供了三个不同选项卡的选择，其中包括一个全新的 Autopilot 模式，用于处理较长工作任务的代理程序。

目前，根据 Jefferies 分析师的数据，互联网上约三分之二的

旅游、商业和预订网站在某种程度上屏蔽了 Muse，这给 Meta 带来了压力，迫使其与单个网站建立更直接的联系。随着这些联系转化为商业协议，且流量被引导至一个新的电子商务生态系统内部，数十亿人的购买习惯可能将受到影响。

相比之下，OpenAI 希望通过高价订阅服务，将其工作代理程序的高强度使用货币化，起初这些服务仅面向每月订阅费至少为 $100 的 ChatGPT 订阅用户开放。

无论定位如何，所有公司都面临着同样的挑战，即如何说服数十亿的

在设计问题背后隐藏着一个更深层的问题——人们是想要一个单一的、无限可塑的个人代理来处理他们所做的一切，还是会转向更多专业化的代理（其中许多嵌入在不同的应用程序中）？目前，许多公司在采取对冲策略。

沃尔玛拥有自己的购物代理，名为 Sparky，但同时也与 Meta 结盟，以便 Muse 用户能更轻松地浏览其网站。相比之下，亚马逊屏蔽了来自 Anthropic、OpenAI 和 Meta 的代理程序——至少目前如此。

是一个由专家组成的领域，还是一个统治一切的单一代理？后者将赋予相关公司巨大的权力，特别是如果它导致了在搜索、社交网络和电子商务市场中已经出现的那种市场集中度。

但任何渴望实现这一目标的公司，首先必须找到正确的方案，才能促使数十亿人改变其数字化行为。

richard.waters@ft.com

法律公告

关于爱尔兰大陆集团（IRISH CONTINENTAL GROUP）公众有限公司，以及关于 2014 年《公司法》，以及关于根据 2014 年《公司法》第 9, 部分第 1 章提出的方案安排建议，以及关于 1997 年《爱尔兰接管小组法》的事宜

通知

根据 2014 年《爱尔兰公司法》（以下简称“该法”）第 453(2)(b) 条，特此通知：在由独立董事召集的爱尔兰大陆集团公众有限公司（公司编号 41043）（以下简称“公司”）于 2026 年 9 月 10 日举行的股东会议上，已通过决议，批准根据该法第 9, 部分第 1 章提出的方案安排（以下简称“该方案”）。该方案的目的是实现 Bluefin BidCo Limited 对公司全部已发行股本的收购。

进一步通知，公司将根据该法第 453(2)(c) 条向爱尔兰高等法院申请一项批准该方案的命令。

该申请将通过一份单一的启动动议通知提交至爱尔兰高等法院，并于2026年11月10日上午11:00（格林威治标准时间）在爱尔兰高等法院的商业名录（Commercial List）中进行审理。有关听证会的信息（或相关日期变更）将在公司网站 www.lcg.ie 上公布。根据爱尔兰高等法院的命令，任何拟出席听证会的利害关系方必须在2026年10月23日（星期五）下午5:30（格林威治标准时间）之前，通过发送电子邮件至 hshaw@algoodbody.com（联系人：Hannah Shaw）将此意向通知公司律师 A&L Goodbody LLP。利害关系方拟在听证会上依赖的任何宣誓书证据均应提交至爱尔兰高等法院中央办公室。公司律师 A&L Goodbody LLP，在上述时间及日期（即2026年10月23日星期五下午5:30（格林威治标准时间））之前，亦应通过发送电子邮件至 hshaw@algoodbody.com（联系人：Hannah Shaw）告知公司律师 A&L Goodbody LLP。

日期：2026年10月9日 签署：A&L Goodbody LLP 爱尔兰大陆集团（Irish Continental Group，公众有限公司）之律师 25 North Wall Quay 都柏林 1 爱尔兰

三星利润飙升至创纪录的 800亿美元

芯片制造商的业绩指引显示，在 AI 需求激增的推动下，利润增长近九倍

宋正雅（SONG JUNG-A）——首尔

三星电子（Samsung Electronics）预计其第三季度营业利润将激增近九倍，因为 AI 公司对存储芯片的强劲需求继续推动全行业出现短缺。

这家全球最大的存储芯片制造商预计，7 月至 9 月期间的营业利润将达到创纪录的 107.4 万亿韩元（802亿美元）。

相比之下，去年同期为 12.2 万亿韩元，且高于 LSEG SmartEstimate 汇总的 106 万亿韩元的预期。销售额预计为 195 万亿韩元，同比增长 126.6%。

三星在发布完整的季度业绩之前，会先公布预期的利润和销售数据。这一乐观的指引代表了连续第四个季度的创纪录表现，并凸显了存储芯片的长期短缺，因为 AI 公司正在抢购供应并推高价格。

三星表示，它成为了全球首家报告季度营业利润超过 100 万亿韩元的科技公司。

存储芯片——驱动 AI 的数据中心中的关键组件——的高需求，为三星等芯片制造商带来了创纪录的利润和股价。其股价今年已翻了一倍多，估值约为 $1.3tn。

这种需求也给存储芯片的其他买家带来了压力，包括智能手机和计算机制造商，它们不得不应对更高的价格。

根据市场研究机构 TrendForce 的数据，用于在设备上存储短期记忆的传统动态随机存取存储器（DRAM）芯片的合约价格预计在第四季度将上涨 10 to 15 per cent。

分析师预计芯片紧缺情况将持续到明年，而与 AI 公司签署的长期供应合同比例增加，保护了利润率。美国芯片制造商美光科技（Micron）上周表示，未来两年行业可能会出现更紧张的市场局面。

“我们预计明年的存储供应将比今年更紧张，”未来资产证券（Mirae Asset Securities）分析师金英根（Kim Young-geon）表示，“新签署的长期合同价格高于现有合同。”

SK 证券分析师韩东熙（Han Dong-hee）表示，长期协议的增加减少了该行业过去那种繁荣与萧条交替的特性以及价格波动。

他在最近的一份报告中表示：“即使盈利峰值可能会略低一些，但盈利维持在高水平的时间将大大延长，从而最大限度地提高累计现金生成能力。”

在最前沿的 AI 硬件领域，在多年努力缩小与竞争对手 SK 海力士（SK Hynix）之间差距后，三星最近在开发先进的 HBM4 芯片方面取得了进展。

然而，在对 AI 存在性风险的担忧中，一些投资者对芯片的长期需求提出质疑。一些美国科技公司已呼吁放缓 AI 的开发。

作为投资者担忧的迹象，尽管利润创纪录，三星股价昨日仍下跌 2.4 per cent。其股价较 6 月份的峰值已下跌超过四分之一。

“投资者正在关注公司的季度数据之外，等待更明确的信号，以确认上升周期在明年和后年能否持续，”总部位于首尔的 Petra Capital Management 管理合伙人 Albert Yong 表示。

Yong 补充道：“他们更关心行业何时见顶，以及是否会重复过去严重的繁荣与萧条周期。”

体育。法律行动

LIV Golf 加速与球员谈判

支持者希望通过提供股权结算以抵偿现有债权，从而重启该系列赛

SUJEET INDAP —— 纽约

代表高尔夫球星布赖森·德尚博（Bryson DeChambeau）的律师正寻求组织一个球员联盟，以便与破产的 LIV Golf 联赛的继任者就加入新巡回赛的条款进行谈判。

一个由 Weil, Gotshal and Manges 律师事务所代表的拟议球员“指导”委员会，可能会在法庭上以及在 和 BC Partners（Chapter 11 破产案中的两个相对方）面前提出球员诉求。这将独立于官方债权人委员会。

德尚博对潜在新团队形式的兴趣，正值 的另一位顶尖球星乔恩·拉姆（Jon Rahm）的律师周三向新泽西州一家联邦破产法院表示，拉姆将不会签约。拉姆的律师进一步表示，这位西班牙球员正与现有的 就“一项共识性分离协议进行深入讨论”。

《金融时报》此前报道， 欠球员的约 $400mn 未付款项中，大部分是由德尚博和拉姆持有。

、其之前的支持者沙特阿拉伯公共投资基金（PIF）以及私募资本赞助商 BC Partners 本周达成的一项协议包括：向 PIF 提供的 $50mn 现有破产贷款中贡献 $4mn，由该资产管理公司的资金资助“ 2.0”的启动。

已告知法院，如果新计划在月底前未能达成，它将把破产案件转为“清算”程序，这将使 陷入一场争取关键规模球员数量的竞赛。

据《金融时报》报道， 表示愿意牵头总计 $300mn 的投资以启动 2.0，但 坚持要求该投资者立即注资，以证明其组建新联赛的诚意。

与 之间的结算使这家私募资本公司能够向球员发出邀请，因为协议要求该投资者在 October 25 之前与“必要”数量的球员达成协议。

“球现在确实在 和公司这一方，”一名接近 的人士表示，并指出目前还没有球员公开承诺加入 2.0，现在取决于这家私募资本公司能否分享一份完整的商业计划书。

一个由无担保债权人组成的独立委员会已经成立，其七名成员中仅有一名高尔夫球手迈克尔·拉萨索（Michael La Sasso）。其他委员会成员主要是为 Golf 及其赛事提供服务的贸易供应商，且尚未收到款项。

该委员会的顾问包括 Willkie, Farr & Gallagher 律师事务所和咨询集团 Berkeley Research Group。据一名熟悉情况的人士透露， 欠贸易债权人的总额可能超过 $100mn。

的高管特德·戈尔索普（Ted Goldthorpe）在伦敦的一次由行业出版物 Sportico 赞助的会议上表示， 2.0 的球队特许经营权最终价值可能达到 $100mn 或更多。

重启后的 的初步条款要求球员持有新联赛的大部分股权，以此作为对其现有 债权的结算。选择在新联赛中比赛的球员随后可以获得额外的款项。

“你可以看看迈阿密的大卫·贝克汉姆，或者魔术师约翰逊和湖人队。有很多例子。这些人可以鱼与熊掌兼得，”戈尔索普说。

“他们可以在球队层面和控股公司层面创造真正的财富，同时仍然为了奖金而比赛并赚到丰厚收入。只要我们能让这个联赛可持续发展，他们就能在这些球队中创造真正的财富，”他补充道。

“他们可以在球队层面创造真正的财富……同时他们依然为了奖金而战，并赚到丰厚的收入。”

LIV 2.0 预计将重新雇佣员工，并已制定了一份初步的赛事时间表，据一名熟悉其计划的人士透露。

该人士表示，大型家族办公室已表达了参与拟议的 $300mn 融资的兴趣。关于破产（BC）的讨论正直接与球员、经纪人以及经营当前 LIV 球队特许经营权的商业人士进行。

无担保债权人委员会主要关注贸易供应商，其利益可能与球员相抵触，这一分歧导致一些律师事务所开始推销成立一个仅由球员组成的倡议小组的想法。

除了经济条款外，考虑加入 LIV 2.0 的球员还表示担心，竞争对手联赛（如美国 PGA 巡回赛和欧洲 DP 世界巡回赛）可能不允许他们在赛季期间在不同巡回赛之间往返。

Weil, Gotshal 是美国公司重组领域最著名的律师事务所之一，最近代表汽车零部件制造商 First Brands 处理其第 11 章破产案件。

多个相关方已由其各自的法律顾问向破产法院登记出庭。其中一家律师事务所 Reed Smith 代表五名球员，并可能旨在组建一个委员会。

LIV 最近同意了高尔夫球手塞尔希奥·加西亚（Sergio Garcia）的一项请求，允许他正式终止与该联赛的球员协议，尽管该联赛此前已试图作为破产程序的一部分作废此类合同。

加西亚的律师告诉法院，除了通过法院程序作废协议外，他们还需要一份正式的终止协议，以便能够签署新的代言合同并加入另一个联赛——无论是 LIV 2.0 还是其他联赛。

在周三的法庭听证会上，多名高尔夫球手的律师表示他们也希望获得正式终止。目前尚不清楚加西亚或其他寻求终止协议的球员是否仍对 LIV 2.0 感兴趣。

OCR 结果应为空，因为源图像仅包含一条根据规则 2 必须忽略的装饰性水平线。不应输出任何文本或占位符字符。

零售

优衣库母公司有望在美欧销售额激增中超越 H&M

哈里·登普西（HARRY DEMPSEY）——东京

在经历全球销售热潮后，这家日本服装店优衣库（Uniqlo）母公司的年度销售额有望首次超过瑞典的 H&M。

快时尚巨头迅销（Fast Retailing）以其在全球范围内知名的摇粒绒、袜子和保暖内衣而闻名。该公司表示，在截至 8 月 31 日的财年中，年度营收增长 16.6%，达到 ¥3.96tn (250亿美元)，同时宣布大幅提高股息。相比之下，分析师预计 H&M 在下个月结束的完整财年中的营收为 2220 亿瑞典克朗 (222亿美元)。

迅销的目标是超越 Zara 的母公司 Inditex，成为全球最大的大众市场休闲时尚零售商。创始人柳井正（Tadashi Yanai）昨日表示：“我们追求成为第一的目标进入了一个新阶段。”

超越 H&M 将成为优衣库的一个里程碑时刻。由于消费者倾向于极简主义风格，优衣库对设计精良的基础款产品的专注，使其表现优于其他快时尚品牌。

优衣库总裁冢越大介（Daisuke Tsukagoshi）表示，随着气候变化导致极端且不可预测的天气增多，扩大销售的一个“关键”将是加强其“无季节性”服装的供应。他表示：“我们过去围绕四季来构建产品线，但现在季节之间的界限正在发生变化。”

优衣库成立于 1984, 年，是日本品牌在资产泡沫破裂后将商业模式全球化的罕见案例。该连锁店利用先进面料大规模生产一系列简单且价格实惠的服装和内衣，主要通过实体店销售。

迅销将自己与其他控制从设计到销售全流程的主流休闲时尚零售商进行基准对比。

在这种排名中——不包括电商平台 Shein、折扣店 TJ Maxx、运动品牌和奢侈品牌——优衣库有望跃过 H&M 位居第二。

零售业智库 FashionSights 的创始人阿希姆·伯格（Achim Berg）表示：“在营收上超越 H&M 长期以来一直是迅销领导层的目标。这一里程碑既证明了优衣库商业模式的强势，也证明了 H&M 目前的疲软。”

不过，伯格提醒道，迅销要实现柳井正成为全球最大时尚零售商的雄心，仍有“一段路要走”。

H&M 并非唯一陷入困境的快时尚零售商。将中国制造的廉价服装直接销售给西方消费者的 Shein 表示，伊朗战争的影响和新的进口关税打击了其第二季度的利润。

在过去的 15 年里，迅销的年销售额平均实现了两位数增长。今年，由于新店开业和一系列热门产品的推出推动了销售，该公司实现了 2023 年以来最大幅度的增长。

这支撑了其连续第五年创纪录的净利润，达到 5420亿人民币 (34亿美元)，超过了其 5000亿人民币 的预期，且比前一年增长了四分之一。

该公司将 2026 财年的股息预期提高了三分之一，至每股 ¥850。公司预计强劲表现将持续，下一财年的营收将增长 12% 至 ¥4.45tn，预计净利润为 5600亿人民币。

由于优衣库开始进入欧洲的小城市和美国的购物中心，今年其在日本以外的营收增长了超过四分之一。

EasyJet 因成本上升削减更多冬季航班

彼得·坎贝尔（PETER CAMPBELL）与伊恩·约翰斯顿（IAN JOHNSTON） 布鲁塞尔

由于这家低成本航空公司在行业淡季加大力度遏制成本，EasyJet 将从其冬季航班计划中再削减 700,000 个座位，以节省燃料费用。

首席执行官肯顿·贾维斯（Kenton Jarvis）表示，公司正在缩减淡季期间的运力，以避免支付更高额的燃料费用，而燃料价格自 2 月份伊朗冲突以来已大幅飙升。

今年夏天早些时候，easyJet 已从冬季航班中削减了约 700,000 个座位。贾维斯表示，该航空公司现在将再移除 600,000 到 700,000 个座位——相当于大约两天的飞行量。

这家欧洲最大的航空公司之一的廉价承运商，在 10 月至 3 月底的冬季航季通常提供约 5,000 万个航班座位。

他告诉《金融时报》：“人们正在削减运力，我们在所有竞争对手中都看到了这一点，”并补充说，考虑到燃料成本，这“并不令人惊讶”。“我坦白认为，对于整个行业来说，燃料价格能维持在如此高位相当令人惊讶。”

“我坦白认为，对于整个行业来说，燃料价格能维持在如此高位相当令人惊讶”

在伊朗冲突开始并导致霍尔木兹海峡关闭后，航空燃料成本大约翻了一番。贾维斯补充说，尽管价格已开始下跌，但仍远高于冲突开始时航空公司的预期。

贾维斯表示，欧洲航空公司对部分燃料风险进行了套期保值，但对于剩余部分，他们不得不支付更高的价格。他补充说，通过削减运力，EasyJet 可以减少对昂贵燃料的使用。

他的上述言论发表在瑞安航空（Ryanair）上周表示将取消部分航班以节省冬季开支之后。

其负责人迈克尔·奥利利（Michael O'Leary）昨天表示，他预计高燃料成本将持续另外 18 个月。他说：“明年我们都将面临巨大的成本挑战。”

全球行业组织国际航空运输协会（Iata）此前已警告称，燃料成本上升将使该行业今年额外增加 1000亿美元 的成本。自冲突开始以来，已有几家航空公司陷入破产，包括美国的 Spirit 航空。

奥利利、贾维斯及其他负责人警告称，在成本上升的同时，航空公司还面临着来自环保法规的额外负担。

安永营收增长速度超过竞争对手德勤

STEPHEN FOLEY —— 纽约

在过去一年中，安永（EY）的全球营收增长有所加速，这家“四大”会计师事务所试图在作为全球企业大型外包供应商的领域，侵占竞争对手德勤（Deloitte）的市场份额。

该公司还受益于强劲的并购活动，这推动了其交易咨询业务的发展，助力安永在截至6月30日的财年中，全球营收增长4.7%，达到570亿美元。

相比之下，前12个月的增长率为4%；在剔除汇率波动后，这一增速超过了德勤最近一年的年度增长率3.8%。

另外两家“四大”会计与咨询公司——普华永道（PwC）和毕马威（KPMG）尚未公布营收数据。

安永全球增长与创新管理合伙人 Raj Sharma 表示，这一结果反映了这家拥有415,000名员工的公司所进行的重组，其中包括专注于所谓的“管理服务”，即为客户接管后台、税务、财务和IT职能。

尽管安永在美洲地区裁员后，去年整体员工人数仅增长了2%，但其全球服务中心（包括为全公司构建技术的中心）的员工人数增长了12%。

虽然德勤在四大事务所的外包服务领域处于领先地位，但安永表示，其自身的管理服务业务在过去一年增长了13%，达到约70亿美元。这些服务大多销售给税务客户，但该公司还报告称，其咨询业务（包括网络安全等IT服务）中的管理服务增长了20%。

“管理服务方面的结果，是过去六七个月里所有这些举措共同发挥作用的累积效应，”Sharma 表示。

提供战略和交易咨询的 EY Parthenon 是安永过去一年增长最快的部门，营收为68亿美元，按固定汇率计算增长7.4%。规模最大的审计业务增长最慢，增长3%至189亿美元。税务业务增长6%至138亿美元。

该公司表示，帮助客户实施 AI 推动了其咨询业务的增长，该业务营收增长4.4%至174亿美元。尽管这一增速低于去年，但其减速幅度没有德勤咨询部门那么剧烈。德勤已于上月公布报告。

“四大”在结构上是由当地拥有的私营合伙企业网络组成，不公布全球利润数据，但 Sharma 表示，安永在截至6月的财年中扩大了盈利能力。

“我们所有的成员所在该领域都表现良好，”他说道。

公司与市场

竞争对手削减产能之际，宝马加倍投资德国生产

汽车制造商在高端细分市场几乎没有中国竞争对手的情况下，向巴伐利亚工厂投资 20亿欧元

OLAF STORBECK — 慕尼黑

在德国最昂贵的城市之一，一座位于慕尼黑市中心、被住宅区环绕的百年工厂已成为宝马（BMW）下一代汽车的生产枢纽。

宝马位于公司总部对面的一座主工厂拥有 6,000 名员工，他们正在制造全新纯电版本的 3 Series。自 1975, 推出以来，这家德国汽车制造商已售出超过 1800 万辆该车型，而第八代车型的生产已于 8 月开始。

“这就是我们制造未来汽车的地方，”工厂负责人彼得·韦伯（Peter Weber）在接受《金融时报》工厂参观采访时表示。

慕尼黑工厂的改造是宝马对德国制造业未来的一次高风险押注的核心。在劳动力和能源成本高企导致大众（Volkswagen）和梅赛德斯（Mercedes）削减国内产能之际，宝马正试图与德国工业的衰退脱钩，而德国工业每月流失的就业岗位高达 15,000 个。

“我们绝对认为德国作为一个制造基地的未来是光明的，”该集团生产负责人雷蒙德·维特曼（Raymond Wittmann）表示。

该工厂于 1922, 开始生产飞机发动机和摩托车，在过去五年中进行了重建。制造流程延伸至由电梯连接的 3 层楼，自动驾驶机器人将零部件直接送至装配线。

宝马在慕尼黑和丁戈尔芬（Dingolfing）的 3 Series 生产基地，以及慕尼黑东北约 135 公里的一个新电池工厂中投资了约 20亿欧元。维特曼表示：“这是对我们所在地以及我们家乡非常明确的承诺。”

虽然该集团在匈牙利德布勒森（Debrecen）的新工厂也花费了约 20亿欧元，并且正在裁减 8,000 多个后台岗位，但蓝领工人被排除在裁员范围之外。

与竞争对手一样，宝马也受到了中国市场销量下滑和美国关税的沉重打击。今年 5 月就任首席执行官的米兰·内德尔科维奇（Milan Nedeljković）在夏天警告称，宝马的营业利润率需要 5 年多时间才能恢复到长期以来 8 到 10 per cent 的区间。今年，该集团预计利润率仅为 1 到 3 per cent。

但宝马的国内生产情况比其德国竞争对手更为稳健。去年在德国制造的车辆中，每四辆就有一辆是宝马，产量为 1.07mn 辆，略低于 2024 年的产量。

虽然 2025 年德国汽车产量较疫情前水平下降了 10 per cent，但宝马增长了 6 per cent，这得益于其决定将 Mini Countryman、X1 和部分 5 Series 车型的生产从荷兰和奥地利的合作伙伴处收回至内部生产。

瑞银集团（UBS）欧洲汽车研究主管帕特里克·胡梅尔（Patrick Hummel）表示：“在过去几年中，[宝马] 获得了市场份额，且在德国的工厂利用率一直高于梅赛德斯或大众。”

作为一个高端品牌，宝马目前在本土市场面临来自中国新竞争对手的压力较小。与大众市场竞争对手相比，高端汽车制造商每辆车的利润更高，通常能带来更高的利润率，这有助于它们应对德国的劳动力成本。

“宝马拥有不同的（企业和管理）文化，”巴伐利亚州金属工业工会（IG Metall）负责人兼宝马监事会成员霍斯特·奥特（Horst Ott）告诉《金融时报》。他指出，宝马的领导层不仅仅是“从一个季度的 [息税前利润] 数字思考到下一个”，而是采取了更长期的视角。

宝马 i3 在其慕尼黑工厂的生产情况。下方图片显示，该工厂在 1922 年开始运营时生产摩托车和飞机发动机。 Fabian Kirchbauer, Alamy

该集团目前的地位在很大程度上归功于多年前做出的决定，包括提高在中国和美国市场的本地化车辆生产比例。因此，德国工厂受亚洲销量下滑以及唐纳德·特朗普关税影响程度较低。

宝马（BMW）比其德国竞争对手更早地拥抱电动汽车，于2013年推出了首款i3。该车型在商业上遭遇失败，但让宝马在电动汽车专用生产的风险方面汲取了重要教训。

这家汽车制造商一直受到稳健的基础需求的支撑，Hummel将其描述为“极其强劲”。

沃尔夫斯堡奥斯特法利亚应用科学大学（Ostfalia Hochschule Wolfsburg）汽车经济学教授Helena Beron Wisbert将此归因于

“[宝马] 获得了市场份额，且在德国的工厂利用率一直高于梅赛德斯或大众”

来源：VDAI；宝马；金融时报计算

“相对较新”的车型阵容以及电动汽车的“顶尖技术”。

全电动iX3 SUV在匈牙利制造，是首款基于宝马“新世代”（Neue Klasse）软件控制平台的车型。自一年前上市以来，该车型已获得超过100,000份订单，导致买家面临长达一年的等待期。

“我们正在尽可能快地提高产量，”Wittmann表示。上个月，宝马为其德布勒森工厂增加了夜班，通过三班倒实现每天24小时生产车辆。“电动3系可能会像iX3一样成为一款爆款产品，”Hummel说道。

然而，这家汽车制造商无法逃避在德国生产所面临的严峻经济形势。Union Investment的基金经理Moritz Kronenberger指出，劳动力和能源成本高昂，“从冷静的经济角度来看，几乎没有理由在德国投资新工厂”，“资金可能更好地投资在其他地方”。

宝马工厂负责人Weber表示，尽管慕尼黑工厂拥有历史底蕴且靠近总部，但“我们并不享有任何特殊地位”。他强调，他的工厂必须“与任何其他生产基地一样具有竞争力”。

随着工厂的现代化和“新世代”平台的应用，单车生产成本降低了10%。新系统实现了数字化和简化，且“准时制”（just in time）交付的零部件比例从45%增加到68%，从而降低了仓储成本。

Wittmann表示，虽然德国的每小时劳动力成本大约是匈牙利的三倍，但整体生产成本的差距要小得多。

“综合来看，并没有太大差异，”他说道。一辆电动汽车的材料成本约为€20,000-€25,000，而劳动力成本则在€1,500-€2,000之间。德国工厂还受益于靠近关键供应商，从而保持较低的物流成本。

然而，即使在宝马内部，人们也担心经济形势可能会对德国工厂不利。一名熟悉监事会成员想法的人士表示，该成员对拥有更新技术和更低成本的中国竞争对手感到“非常、非常担忧”，并担心未来可能需要进一步裁员。

Wittmann表示，如果供应商网络向东欧转移且更多零部件在当地采购，德国工厂的竞争力可能会在“中长期内”恶化。他认为，较低的物流成本“可能会进一步将平衡点”向东欧生产转移。“这就是为什么继续优化德国的劳动力成本、能源成本和整体系统至关重要。”

基础资源

军工部门警告美国金属储备计划存在风险

卡米拉·霍奇森（CAMILLA HODGSON）——伦敦

国防承包商警告称，美国一项储备关键矿产的计划可能会推高价格，并与工业买家在稀缺材料方面产生不当竞争。

航空工业协会（Aerospace Industries Association, AIA）在昨日发布的一份成员观点报告中表示，美国政府应“谨慎行事”，以避免扭曲市场。

美国出口进口银行（US Export-Import Bank）今年公布了一项 120亿美元 计划——“金库项目”（Project Vault），旨在建立一个战略性国内金属储备，供民用工业在短缺时期使用。

此举背景是国际资源竞争的加速，以及美国与中国之间的贸易战，后者导致北京限制了一系列对现代技术至关重要的金属的获取。

该行业组织表示，AIA成员担心，在“全球供应已经受限的情况下”，“金库项目”会与企业买家竞争关键矿产，“这可能会导致企业的市场价格上涨和波动增加”。

该组织成员包括 Palantir Technologies 和 BAE Systems。该组织表示，希望“金库项目”在进行任何采购之前解决其顾虑，并更好地解释该计划将如何运作。

出口进口银行为该项目的工作辩护。其在一份声明中表示：“‘金库项目’是美国制造商的缓冲器。‘金库项目’的建立是为了保护美国生产线免受供应冲击，而不是与它所服务的公司竞争。”

五角大楼拒绝置评。

包括因硬度而备受推崇的钨以及用于制造磁铁的稀土元素在内的金属，是国防供应链的关键。但由于主导生产的北京方面压缩了供应，过去两年的价格大幅飙升。

美国和其他国家正竞相建立替代来源并增加储备，这些努力可能会加剧国家之间和行业之间的竞争。

西班牙的 Abenojar Tungsten 告诉《金融时报》，其矿山在运营前十年将生产的所有金属已全部出售给贸易公司 Traxys，后者将向包括“金库项目”在内的客户供货。

AIA还警告称，其成员将需要更多时间来遵守美国 1 月 1 日的截止日期，该日期禁止国防团体为军事用途从中国采购稀土磁铁。

这些高科技组件被应用于从电动汽车到战斗机和武器系统的所有设备中，而中国以外只有少数公司能规模化生产。

AIA表示，对于不合规项目，在“1 月 1 日之后”仍有必要提供豁免，且该行业所需的豁免数量可能会“非常可观”。

该组织表示，除非建立一个明确的流程来处理豁免申请，否则这将给政府造成“行政瓶颈”。

AIA国际事务副总裁达克·哈德威克（Dak Hardwick）表示：“对于工业界来说，完全没有豁免将非常难以承受，我敢说这几乎是不可能的。”

唐纳德·特朗普总统在 7 月发布了一项行政命令，限制未来豁免权的发放。

下一代搜索AI颠覆新加坡“量化奥运会”，更多人得以参与竞争

欧文·沃克（OWEN WALKER）——新加坡

如果今年的“量化奥运会”能说明任何问题的话，那么人工智能将使对冲基金经理之间的协作减少，而竞争更加激烈。

这项年度赛事正式名称为“国际量化锦标赛”（International Quant Championship），本周在新加坡举行。它实时地揭示了对冲基金行业是如何被AI颠覆的。

量化（Quant，quantitative的缩写）对冲基金利用算法来挖掘金融市场的模式。它们一直是AI兴起的最大受益者之一，从全球政府债券的波动中获得了巨额收益。

赛事组织方WorldQuant的首席执行官伊戈尔·图尔钦斯基（Igor Tulchinsky）表示，来自13个国家的学生参与竞争，争夺$100,000的现金奖金池，并获得在一个经历着“激进转型”的领域工作的机会。

他表示，量化领域正处于一个“拐点”。“一些公司正利用新技术赚到惊人的财富。一旦你尝试过AI，就再也不会回头，因为其提升幅度如此之大。”

在新加坡圣托莎度假岛举行的这场奢华活动中，决赛入围者在舞台上挥舞着国旗亮相，而前运动员则就如何在逆境中成长发表了鼓舞人心的演讲。

量化领域竞争极其激烈，吸引了工程、物理和数学背景的毕业生。

该锦标赛于2018年启动，旨在帮助发掘未来的之星，并为来自西方顶尖大学这些传统对冲基金人才摇篮之外的才俊提供平台。

今年，全球有超过156,000名学生报名参加，几乎是去年总数的两倍。组织者表示，申请人数的激增部分归功于AI，因为这些工具可以免费获得，使得更多人能够参与其中。

通过让参赛者设计的交易程序使用真实数据进行相互博弈，申请者被筛选至13名决赛入围者。

在周二上午的正式仪式后，决赛入围者（包括个人和团队）收到了一道数学题。在四个多小时的时间里，参赛者们在圣托莎场馆的一个功能厅内围在笔记本电脑旁，通过运行算法尝试解决该问题。

周三，每位决赛入围者向评委和同行展示了他们的结果，来自尼日利亚的维克多·阿耶巴梅鲁（Victor Ayebameru）最终夺冠。

今年个人参赛人数增加了75,000多人，而增加的团队仅有1,000个。组织者表示，这是增加使用AI的另一个结果，因为个人申请者现在能够完成此前需要整个研究团队才能开展的工作。

尼日利亚的维克多·阿耶巴梅鲁在国际量化锦标赛上

“现在我编写代码的时间不到一小时，而以前需要一周甚至一个月的时间，”新加坡国立大学的计算机科学专业学生肖恩·让·莫伊（Sean Jean Moey）说道，他成功进入了决赛。

新加坡长期以来一直以能够培养数学天才而自豪。新加坡现代奠基人之子、前总理李显龙因在剑桥大学数学课上名列前茅而闻名。

AI的支持者表示，这些工具帮助降低了进入量化领域的财务和技术门槛，允许来自更广泛背景的人参与其中。

这一趋势在锦标赛中显而易见：28%的申请者来自非洲（2023年为4%），26%为女性（去年为18%）。

WorldQuant的首席战略官尼蒂什·迈尼（Nitish Maini）表示：“我们看到AI工具如何帮助降低技术门槛，这可能会引发研究人员带来一波真正新颖的方法。”

然而，对于本周新加坡许多渴望成为基金经理的人来说，AI给量化领域带来的最大直接冲击，是它在求职首份工作时带来的压力。

“这个行业一直竞争激烈，但现在许多管理人员认为，如果他们可以使用AI，就不需要招聘初级岗位的人员，”剑桥大学信息与计算机工程专业的学生贝利·刘（Bailey Liu）表示。“但AI应该提升人类员工的能力，而不是取代他们。”

英国公司

（无内容输出）

金融服务

德勤因审计失败被罚款 £6mn

会计监管机构发现该铁路运营商审计工作中存在“模式化”问题

ELLESHEVA KISSIN — 伦敦

英国会计监管机构对德勤（Deloitte）处以 £6mn 的罚款，原因是该公司在对铁路和运输运营商 Go-Ahead 开展的为期五年的审计中，出现了“令人深感担忧的模式化失败”。

财务报告理事会（FRC）昨日表示，将对这家四大会计师事务所处以罚款，因为其在 2016 年至 2020 年期间对 Go-Ahead 三家子公司的审计工作中违反了审计要求。

监管机构表示，由于德勤的“卓越配合”，罚款金额从 £11mn 下调。

该监管机构在四年前启动了此次调查，此前 - 陷入危机。英国政府在发现该公司未能申报应退还的数千万英镑纳税人资金后，于 2021 年剥夺了其东南铁路特许经营权。

FRC 发现，- 反而将这笔资金留存，并开始将其作为利润释放。这种做法直到政府发现多付资金后才停止，政府最终对该公司处以 £23.5mn 的罚款。

总计在 2016 至 2020 财年期间，- 留存了超过 £30mn 的多付资金，其中在德勤担任审计师期间，有 £8mn 被记录为利润。

FRC 表示，德勤并未对这种非法留存公共资金的行为提出质疑。

FRC 发现，尽管内部就此事发出了重大警告，但德勤的工作底稿并未讨论围绕多付资金的欺诈风险。

此外，该监管机构表示，德勤团队的一名成员在 2019 年给审计主导合伙人发送电子邮件，警告称 - 的管理层不希望“引起人们对”多付资金的注意。

该合伙人审阅了一份文件，其中提到对账目的修改旨在“隐藏”这些多付资金。

FRC 表示，该合伙人“未能意识到这是一次蓄意的……掩盖”问题的尝试，并签署了账目。

由于“特殊的个人情况”，监管机构未对该合伙人采取行动。

监管机构还在 - 的另外两家子公司中发现了问题。

FRC 表示，在伦敦-伯明翰铁路公司，该公司“试图掩盖”欠英国交通部的 £5.6mn 款项。监管机构还表示，在德国子公司 Gaby，德勤对苛刻的合同条款采取了“不足的审查”。

• 此后已私有化并退市。该公司已基本退出英国铁路市场，但在 2024 年获得了一项共同运营伦敦伊丽莎白线的合同。

监管机构目前对德勤还有三项待处理的调查。去年，德勤在英国的合伙人平均薪酬达到了创纪录的 £1.13mn。

德勤英国公司表示：“我们很遗憾审计工作的某些方面未达到预期标准，并已从中吸取教训。我们致力于持续改进并提供高质量的审计。”

• 表示，FRC 的调查涉及“一个历史问题”，公司“已从该事件中吸取教训，并在此后发生了重大转型”。

航空航天与国防。军事主权

SkyNet卫星竞标考验“购买英国产品”承诺

空客与洛克希德展开竞争，价值高达£2bn的合同决策在即

SYLVIA PFEIFER — 伦敦

全球两家领先的航空航天与国防集团正为英国军队下一代卫星的建设展开竞争，这已成为对工党在军事主权立场上的早期考验。

这项新SkyNet卫星合同的预估价值高达20亿英镑，使数十年来一直监管SkyNet的欧洲航空航天集团空客（Airbus）与来自美国的竞争对手洛克希德·马丁（Lockheed Martin）陷入对峙。

承诺将“购买英国产品”的部长们正受到游说，要求他们继续选择这家欧洲公司，因为该公司的存在帮助英国成为了军事卫星通信中心。

但他们还必须应对与华盛顿唐纳德·特朗普总统政府之间日益不可预测的关系。

《金融时报》今年曾报道，官员们曾质疑英国是否应该将如此关键的军事能力委托给一家美国公司。

在英国承诺加强军事能力的背景下，关于SkyNet的决定将是由首相安迪·伯纳姆（Andy Burnham）在7月任命的国防大臣韦斯·斯特雷廷（Wes Streeting）做出的首批大额支出选择之一。

与此同时，乌克兰战争凸显了欧洲国家对空间通信的依赖，基辅在利用卫星提供情报以击退俄罗斯军队方面高度依赖此类技术。

战略研究国际研究所（IISS）高级研究员道格拉斯·巴里（Douglas Barrie）表示，无论政府如何选择都会面临批评。他补充道：“如果选择美国，你的国防工业政策看起来就像是起步就错了；如果选择现有的空客，则需要将来自白宫的任何反弹降至最低。”

SkyNet是英国自20世纪60年代起就开始运行的军事卫星通信系统。国防部正通过其SkyNet 6计划升级该网络，价值高达£2bn的合同涵盖了两颗地球静止轨道卫星，将提供直到2040年代及之后的安全通信。

最终前沿：英国SkyNet军事卫星系统，空客希望能在其史蒂夫尼奇（Stevenage）基地进行升级。图片来源：Airbus / Cover Images / Reuters Connect; Amazing Aerial / Alamy Stock Photo

据两名知情人士透露，去年年底提交的最终报价将于11月中旬到期，决定预计将在未来几周内做出。

空客在设计和制造卫星方面的工作帮助支撑了其在史蒂夫尼奇和朴茨茅斯基地的约2,500个工作岗位，以及更广泛供应链中的另外18,000个岗位。约650名空客员工直接从事SkyNet工作。

自1974年起就参与SkyNet的空客的支持者敦促英国将合同授予这家欧洲集团。

Unite工会总书记莎伦·格雷厄姆（Sharon Graham）表示，政府需要“确保其兑现投资英国工业并在国防领域购买英国产品的承诺”。

史蒂夫尼奇的工党议员凯文·博纳维亚（Kevin Bonavia）表示，SkyNet 6对于保留“支撑真正主权英国空间能力的技能、专业知识、供应链和行动自由”至关重要。

据知情人士透露，如果未能赢得该合同，可能导致价值高达£10bn的潜在空客出口面临风险。此次竞标是在欧洲空间领域更广泛整合的背景下进行的。

空客正与法国的泰雷兹（Thales）和意大利的莱昂纳多（Leonardo）进行谈判，旨在创建一个泛欧空间冠军企业，以能够与埃隆·马斯克的SpaceX以及来自中国和俄罗斯的竞争对手抗衡。这些公司正在讨论不同卓越中心的选址。

接近空中客车（Airbus）的人士担心，如果该公司不能获得 SkyNet 合同，英国可能会失去其作为军事卫星通信中心的地位。一名接近空中客车的高管表示：“如果你不是太空强国，你就无法参与那种对话。”

洛克希德（Lockheed）表示，如果其竞标获胜，将在英格兰东北部建立一个新的制造设施，并承诺在英国创建一个“国家太空生态系统”，提供约 2,000 个工作岗位，其中 400 多个为直接就业岗位。

这家美国国防巨头还表示，将把英国作为未来太空计划的出口枢纽，目前已确定约 150亿美元 的潜在出口机会。行业专家表示，不应低估与美国军方强大的太空能力进行深度整合的潜力。

曾有“美国是否为可靠合作伙伴”的担忧

然而，批评人士质疑洛克希德的工厂将具有多少“主权”，认为该公司将依赖美国的知识产权。

洛克希德强调，其技术的“设计权限”（即创建并能修改特定武器的公司或组织）将留在英国。

在上周于利物浦举行的工党会议上，几位国防工业高管表示，在采购决策中，关于什么构成“英国本土化”仍然缺乏明确定义。

空中客车和洛克希德均拒绝置评。

《国防分析》（Defence Analysis）编辑弗朗西斯·图萨（Francis Tusa）认为，SkyNet 合同应授予空中客车，他主张在目前存在“美国是否为可靠合作伙伴”担忧的时刻，必须考虑其“战略影响”。

国防部表示，两家竞标者都“需对其提案进行全面评估，且必须提供在英国组装、集成和测试的卫星”。

国防部补充道，“设计权限必须设在英国，且一系列关键部件必须由英国供应商提供”。

零售

特易购预测圣诞节饮酒量将下降，健康选择趋势明显

劳拉·奥尼塔（LAURA ONITA）

特易购（Tesco）首席执行官肯·墨菲（Ken Murphy）提出了一个饮酒量较低的圣诞节前景，原因是购物者正在做出更健康的选择；与此同时，这家英国最大的超市连锁店上调了全年利润预期。

“我认为这可能会是一个稍微健康一点的圣诞节，”墨菲昨天告诉记者。“我们认为低酒精和无酒精饮料将迎来强劲增长，”他补充道，尽管购物者在节日期间通常“喜欢尽情享受”。

墨菲表示，顾客越来越多地选择更健康的餐食，食用分量更小且含有更多蛋白质和纤维的食物，并选择更健康的甜点以及低酒精和无酒精饮料。

他补充说，这是向健康生活方式转变的更广泛趋势的一部分，而不仅仅是由于使用减肥药物的人数增加所导致的结果。

墨菲发表上述言论之际，这家富时 100 指数（FTSE 100）成份股公司表示，预计截至2月止年度的利润将在 31.5亿英镑 至 33亿英镑 之间，而4月份的预测为 30亿英镑 至 33亿英镑。该公司股价昨日收盘上涨 5.2%。

特易购在今年上半年，其英国市场的同店销售额增长了 1.5%，

“这可能会是一个稍微健康一点的圣诞节。我们认为低酒精和无酒精饮料将迎来强劲增长”

较去年同期的 4.9% 增长大幅放缓。

集团同店销售额增长 1%，而总营收增长 3.7% 至 373亿英镑。调整后营业利润增长 6.5% 至 18亿英镑。

特易购通过降低价格并在数百种产品上与奥尔迪（Aldi）持平，扩大了对竞争对手的市场领先地位，同时也受益于负债累累的竞争对手 Asda 和 Morrisons 的困境。但在最近几个月，它失去了一部分这些增长。

墨菲表示，在去年强劲增长之后，特易购预计在夏季失去了一些市场份额，并补充说这对管理层来说“并不意外”。

根据 Numerator 旗下 Worldpanel 的数据，它仍占据英国食品销售 27.8% 的份额。

由于伊朗战争等全球问题导致消费者对成本上升变得谨慎，今年英国杂货市场的竞争加剧。

但墨菲表示，顾客表现得相对坚韧，并补充说这在一定程度上反映了人们在应对多年外部冲击后的状态。

“他们在某种程度上已经习惯了，能够应对，并继续生活。”

他表示，在半年报时，得益于激烈的竞争，食品通胀率“远低于工资通胀率”，但拒绝预测未来价格的方向。

在被问及竞争对手 Sainsbury's 和 Morrisons 在2月份终止交易谈判后的超市整合问题时，墨菲表示“我们不过多关注这一点”。

基础资源

伦敦金市协会被指导致坦桑尼亚两名矿工死亡

丹尼尔·托马斯（DANIEL THOMAS）与卡米拉·霍奇森（CAMILLA HODGSON） 伦敦

在高等法院的一起案件开审之初，伦敦金市协会（LBMA）被指导致坦桑尼亚两名矿工死亡。与此同时，该协会正为其作为全球最大黄金市场标准制定者的未来而战。

此次审判于周三开始，起因是两名矿工的家属对该非营利会员协会提起诉讼。据称，这两名矿工在2019年该矿山发生的两次独立事件中被安全部队杀害。

本案的核心在于 LBMA 所谓的“合格交割单”（good delivery list）认证，精炼厂必须获得该认证才能将黄金交付至伦敦金库。

这要求精炼厂必须遵守该行业机构的负责任采购规则，这些规则旨在防止与侵犯人权、冲突或犯罪相关的黄金进入市场。

此案可能会对伦敦（以及通过伦敦影响到全球）数百年之久的金属交易标准，以及近期旨在推广负责任采矿、防止“肮脏”黄金进入市场的尝试产生深远影响。周三，抗议者聚集在法院外。

在开庭陈述中，原告指称 “设计、宣扬并实施了一套负责任采购和认证计划，但这不过是一道厚厚的烟幕”。

原告表示， 通过“使伴随严重虐待行为的运营在商业上可行……掩盖问题重重的供应链以逃避审查 [以及] 在本应暂停或撤销认证以改变现状时仍维持认证”，从而导致了矿工的死亡。

原告认为， 是认证该矿山黄金为负责任采购的认证机构，并称其应当遵循相关程序，因涉嫌侵犯人权而取消该金属的认证。

全盘否认承担责任。在周三的开庭陈述中，该协会否认承担任何所谓的谨慎责任（duty of care）。

该机构的律师表示，其“在法律上不对这两起死亡事件负责，并坚决认为不应针对 提起这些诉讼”。

该协会表示，它并不认证任何黄金为负责任采购，但其认证计划要求精炼厂证明其已建立尽职调查流程和程序。其开庭陈述称：“ 不是审计机构，不进行审计，也无法接触精炼厂相关的机密尽职调查文件。”

此案可能会为针对其他标准制定行业机构的诉讼打开大门。 表示，这可能意味着行业认证计划将对其无法控制的组织的行为负责，而这可能会削弱金属、矿产、服装和农业领域的负责任采购计划。

高等法院的此案可能会对伦敦及全球交易黄金的数百年标准产生深远影响 —— Chris Ratcliffe / Bloomberg

Peel Hunt 的分析师本周表示，如果原告胜诉，对“整个采矿业的影响将是地震级的”。

活动团体 Global Witness 的政策与倡导负责人艾米莉·伊奥娜·斯图尔特（Emily Iona Stewart）表示，此案可能是“自愿认证计划的分水岭时刻”，这些计划“可能不再能够一边向公司和客户提供保证，一边与伤害行为撇清关系”。

她补充道：“任何可信的计划都应该对其认证的公司和供应链进行适当的审查。”

此案源于 2019 年 7 月和 12 月发生在北马拉（North Mara）金矿的事件，该矿位于坦桑尼亚境内，距离肯尼亚边境以南约 20 公里。

这些男子是正在废石和矿浆存储区寻找黄金的小规模手工矿工。据称，他们被警方和私人安保部队杀害，后者在被召集驱散手工矿工时使用了催泪瓦斯和实弹。

该矿山由全球最大的矿业公司之一巴里克（Barrick）拥有并运营，而本案涉及的黄金则经过了一家获得伦敦金银市场协会（LBMA）认证的印度精炼厂。

LBMA的规模很小——截至去年其员工人数为45人，且在上个月提交的财务报表中显示税前亏损£1.6mn，导致储备金仅剩£1.4mn——但这掩盖了其在黄金贸易中的重要性，因为许多精炼厂需要获得其认证才能在市场上进行交易。

这起诉讼威胁到要将其财务储备全部耗尽。在上个月的财务报表中，LBMA表示，如果败诉，可能会产生与原告法律费用相关的£3mn潜在成本。然而，它在报表中补充称，认为其责任无法被证明，并将通过法庭斗争来洗清名誉。

此次法庭诉讼发生在LBMA于意大利索伦托举行年度会议几天之后，首席执行官露丝·克罗威尔（Ruth Crowell）在会上表示，为了“继续并扩大我们的职责”，费用将需要提高。

公司与市场

大宗商品。焦点转移

石油巨头在战争之外寻求中东扩张

尽管伊朗冲突尚未解决，各大集团仍热衷于投资潜力巨大的该地区

马尔科姆·摩尔 (MALCOLM MOORE) 与 维里蒂·拉特克利夫 (VERITY RATCLIFFE) —— 伦敦

全球最大的石油公司正试图在关注中东战争造成的混乱、破坏和产量损失之余，寻求更大规模地获取该地区庞大的油气储量，这是它们数十年来一直追求的目标。

壳牌 (Shell)、英国石油 (BP)、道达尔能源 (TotalEnergies)、康菲 (ConocoPhillips) 和雪佛龙 (Chevron) 的高管本周表达了在这一全球最高产石油地区投资的意愿，认为其丰富的低成本储量超过了上升的风险。

这种信心将在本周末继续延续，许多相同的高管将应沙特能源大臣阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹·本·萨勒曼王子 (Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman) 的邀请前往利雅得参加世界石油大会，尽管由于伊朗支持的胡塞反叛分子对该王国发起军事行动，安全担忧依然存在。

除了重新确认与海湾国家的联系外，一些高管还在培养关系，希望抓住战争带来的新机遇，因为阿拉伯各国政府正在重新评估全球关系，并权衡战后重建设施和投资新基础设施的艰巨任务。

在海湾地区拥有最大规模业务的法国道达尔能源首席执行官帕特里克·普亚内 (Patrick Pouyanné) 表示，他“比以往任何时候”都更渴望向该地区每个国家投入资金，即使他的公司必须建设更多管道来出口原油。

“作为投资者，我坚信中东仍然拥有最便宜的石油，”他说。“我们需要这些石油，但我们需要通过开发替代路线来解锁霍尔木兹海峡，而我们将这样做。我们将在阿布扎比、

伊拉克和叙利亚这样做。这是我们业务的一部分。”

其他在伦敦能源情报论坛 (Energy Intelligence Forum) 上发言的高管也表达了类似的观点。

“由于我是中东人，我可能带有一定的偏见，”具有黎巴嫩-加拿大双重国籍的壳牌负责人瓦埃尔·萨万 (Wael Sawan) 表示，“但我从根本上

相信，由中东极具能力的政府管理的‘高质量资产’意味着这些资源将能够进入市场”。

英国石油首席执行官梅格·奥尼尔 (Meg O'Neill) 表示，这家最初名为英波石油公司 (Anglo-Persian Oil Company) 的企业拥有“根植于中东的历史”。

“我们为与许多国家的长期联系感到非常自豪。我们对受冲突影响的人们深表同情。我们都希望冲突能尽快解决。因此，我们无意退缩，”她补充道。

最大的奖赏将是获得进入沙特阿拉伯和阿拉伯联合酋国的更多机会，这两个国家拥有全球规模最大且生产成本最低的碳氢化合物储量。

传统上，两国都通过其国家石油公司对其最核心的油田实施严格控制，限制外国参与或向国际公司提供相对

较低的回报。

此次论坛是沙特阿美 (Saudi Aramco) 首席执行官阿明·纳赛尔 (Amin Nasser) 自今年2月美国和以色列与伊朗开战以来首次公开演讲，也是他与领先石油公司老板们会面的机会。国家石油公司阿德诺克 (Adnoc) 的负责人穆萨贝·阿尔·卡比 (Musabbeh Al Kaabi) 同样在伦敦参加会议。

“事实是，中东拥有全球 50% 的石油储量，”阿美战略负责人阿什拉夫·阿尔·加扎维 (Ashraf Al Ghazzawi) 表示。“我们拥有最大的闲置产能，拥有 50 年规模的储量，我们是成本最低的生产者。”

他说：“我们必须看向

道达尔能源在德国的一家炼油厂。该公司是寻求投资中东的几家公司之一。下方为英国石油首席执行官梅格·奥尼尔 —— Krisztian Bocsi / Bloomberg;

‘事实是，中东拥有 50% 的全球石油储量’

当前的危机之外。能源是一项长期业务。你无法通过多元化来逃避这些事实。”

然而，活动现场的一位高管指出，尽管海湾地区的生产商在谈论提高韧性的努力，但沙特阿美（Aramco）和阿布扎比国家石油公司（Adnoc）在过去几年里一直在购买海外资产。该高管表示：“看看他们的做法，他们正越来越多地在自身区域之外进行多元化布局。”

康菲石油（ConocoPhillips）执行主席瑞安·兰斯（Ryan Lance）指出，该地区政府已开始意识到需要提供更具吸引力的条款。康菲石油近期与英国石油公司（BP）在伊拉克基尔库克（Kirkuk）油田开展了合作。

他表示：“我们需要一份能够涵盖风险、涵盖我们在该地区所见的地缘政治风险的合同。但目前这一切正开始趋于一致，无论是从国际石油公司的角度，还是从东道国政府的角度。伊拉克和叙利亚已经这么做了，其他国家也开始考虑这一点。”

在提到这家美国公司此前尝试在该国投资时，兰斯说：“我们在伊拉克关注了过去25年，但没有成功。”

雪佛龙（Chevron）首席执行官迈克·沃思（Mike Wirth）同意“如今的经济状况看起来更好”，这家美国巨头距离签署伊拉克西库尔纳（West Qurna）油田的协议仅剩“几个月”时间，该油田此前由俄罗斯卢克石油公司（Lukoil）运营。

他表示：“伊拉克很有吸引力。风险依然真实存在，但回报随风险而至。” 参见 Lex 专栏

我们的全球团队全天 24 小时为您提供影响市场的新闻与观点，ft.com / markets

法国抛售潮后，大投资者在交易中“抄底”

固定收益

伊恩·史密斯（IAN SMITH）——伦敦

本月法国政府债券的抛售潮已蔓延至更广泛的欧元区市场，这吸引了大投资者在包括意大利债券和公司债在内的被低估资产中进行“抄底”，他们押注传染风险被过度夸大了。

由于人们对政府 €3.5tn 债务规模可持续性的担忧日益增加，法国债务的抛售浪潮将该国基准 10 年期债券收益率在本月推至近 25 年来的最高点，接近 5%。

法国相对于 10 年期德国国债的借贷成本溢价（即利差）是衡量投资者担忧的关键指标，目前已跳升至 1.4 个百分点，较本月初上涨了约三分之二。

随着人们对法国债务危机潜在后果的担忧加深，其他欧元区的利差也随之扩大，其中意大利的利差已攀升至 1.1 个百分点以上。

几家大型资产管理公司表示，他们已经趁虚而入，买入那些被卷入抛售潮的更广泛的债务资产，因为他们认为

“如今的欧洲政府债券市场受益于更强大的机构支持”

该地区不太可能走向十多年前欧元区债务危机那样的经济崩溃。

“这不是 2010 年代初的重演，”亚伯丁投资（Aberdeen Investments）基金经理亚历克斯·埃弗里特（Alex Everett）表示，“尽管近期出现波动，但如今的欧洲政府债券市场受益于实质性更强的机构支持和市场信心。”

他表示，该经理已重新押注意大利债券的表现将优于德国国债。

在动荡中，公司信用利差也有所扩大。根据 Ice BofA 指数，欧洲投资级信用债相对于政府债券的期权调整利差从 9 月初的 0.8 个百分点上升至上周五的 1 个百分点，随后在周二回落至 0.95 个百分点。

“我们认为近几日的波动过激，因此一直在抄底几家法国公司，”投资机构 W1M 的固定收益共同负责人詹姆斯·卡特（James Carter）表示，该公司买入了包括保险公司安盛（Axa）和银行集团法国巴黎银行（BNP Paribas）在内的债券。

虽然一些基金经理重新买入法国政府债券，但另一些人则表示，他们不愿逆转长期表现不佳的趋势。

周二，由于投资者对极右翼总统领先者玛丽娜·勒庞（Marine Le Pen）关于财政审慎的承诺做出积极反应，收益率有所下降；但周三随着油价上涨，收益率再次跳升，投资者表示在 4 月总统选举前，法国公共财政的方向仍存在巨大的不确定性。

资产管理

英国金融行为监管局（FCA）建议对持有非流动资产基金的投资者赎回设置90天通知期

马丁·阿诺德（MARTIN ARNOLD）与艾玛·邓克利（EMMA DUNKLEY）

根据金融监管机构提出的新规则，投资于房地产、基础设施和私营公司的基金投资者将被迫等待三个月才能提取资金。

昨日宣布的这一举措旨在避免持有难以出售资产的基金出现流动性错配，从而无法满足投资者的赎回请求。这种情况曾在2022年时任首相利兹·特拉斯（Liz Truss）推出“迷你预算”引发的市场动荡以及2020年疫情期间发生过。

英国金融行为监管局（FCA）表示，如果基金的大部分持仓为房地产、基础设施或非上市公司等非流动资产，将不再能为投资者提供每日提取资金的功能。

根据这些提案（FCA称这将使英国与国际标准保持一致），投资者在提取现金前必须提前90天发出通知。

“基金应当明确其提供的是快速访问权限，还是为房地产等长期投资而构建，”FCA市场总监米歇尔·贝克（Michelle Beck）表示，“我们的规则将帮助公司使这一点更加清晰，并增强市场投资信心。”

这是FCA在六年内第二次提出此类建议。2020年，它曾考虑为投资者从房地产基金中提取资金引入最高六个月的最低通知期。但在行业抵制以及等待国际证券监督管理组织（Iosco）出台国际标准后，该计划被放弃。

“基金应当明确其提供的是快速访问权限，还是为房地产等长期投资而构建”

2022年，债券收益率的急剧上升使得商业地产成为较不具吸引力的资产，并迫使许多养老基金抛售，导致赎回请求激增，促使房地产基金管理人推迟提取并限制赎回。

前明星基金经理尼尔·伍德福德（Neil Woodford）也因其旗舰规模为£3.6bn的股票基金在2019, 年遭遇赎回潮后暂停运作而受到审查，当时市场对其私有资产的流动性以及大型流动股票的糟糕表现表示担忧。

这些措施出台之际，越来越多的公司正试图通过财富管理机构和仅提供执行服务的“DIY”网站向零售投资者销售私有资产基金。然而，人们担心是否所有零售投资者都明白他们无法轻易撤回资金。

“仓促抛售可能会降低价格，损害继续持有投资的投资者，并给市场带来压力，”FCA表示。

监管机构估计，包括 feeder funds（ feeder 基金）在内的17只基金将受到这些提案的影响，其总净资产价值约为72.2亿英镑。这些基金将有两年的时间来达标，且必须提前至少一年通知投资者。监管机构已邀请各方在12月 11 前对其计划提供反馈。

行业组织投资协会（Investment Association）的政策战略与创新总监乔纳森·利普金（Jonathan Lipkin）对FCA的举措表示欢迎，特别是关于调整规则以使个人自管养老金（SIPP）能够继续投资此类基金的提案。

金融

软件故障影响客户，Wise寻求与英国税务机关达成协议

LAITH AL-KHALAF — 伦敦

由于软件故障导致部分投资客户在四年期间缴纳的税款过多或过少，Wise正试图与英国税务海关总署（HMRC）协商达成一项结算协议。

这家汇款应用程序本周联系了约 4,000 名使用其 Wise Asset 服务的英国用户（全球客户在该服务中的投资额达 $9），告知他们在 2021 年至 2025 年期间收到了错误的税务报表。

在《金融时报》看到的一封电子邮件中，该公司表示，目前正与 HMRC 就一项“批量结算”进行谈判，以弥补因该错误而产生的任何税款缺口；该错误是由第三方供应商造成的。公司表示，将向多缴税款的客户提供补偿。

Wise 表示，该问题源于其第三方软件在计算用户股票和基金投资收益时出现失误，而这些收益必须向 HMRC 申报。

这一错误意味着约 4,000 名用户在提交自我评估纳税申报表时，获得了错误的资本利得和收入数据。公司补充称，由于客户个人情况的不同，并非所有收到错误税务报表的人都缴纳了错误的税款。

该公司表示：“ 发现，第三方供应商使用的软件错误导致少数使用我们 Interest 和 Stocks 投资产品的客户收到了错误的税务报表。”

公司补充道：“我们已经修复了该问题，向受影响的客户发放了更正后的报表，并正在积极补救潜在的债务责任，客户目前不存在持续风险。”

还面临对其反洗钱控制的审查

该汇款应用程序的股价在昨日伦敦交易收盘时下跌 2.2%。

此次错误是 面临的最新问题。今年，该公司在反洗钱控制和合规职能方面受到了审查。

今年 6 月，有消息称比利时当局正在调查该公司是否涉嫌洗钱犯罪，以及其账户是否被国际犯罪集团利用。

次月，由于反洗钱检查存在“缺陷”，该金融科技公司的美国银行牌照申请被监管机构拒绝。

在全球拥有 1900 万用户，由 Taavet Hinrikus 和 Kristo Käärmann 于 2011 年创立。

首席执行官 Käärmann 在 2024 年因违反行为准则且未能向英国金融监管机构通报“重大税务问题”而被处以 35 万英镑 罚款。

曾是英国金融科技行业的宠儿，并于 2021 年在伦敦上市，估值接近 £9。但去年该公司决定将其主上市地转移至美国，这一举动震惊了伦敦金融城。

美国财政部频繁干预恐面临信誉受损风险

穆罕默德·埃尔-埃里安（Mohamed El-Erian）市场洞察

在过去一年中的大部分时间里，实体经济和金融市场都在美国经济外交手段日益扩大的阴影下运行。

这些手段涵盖了从更激进的工业政策到关税升级和出口限制，以及扩大道德劝诫。结果是，市场的资源配置和价格发现日益偏离商业和经济逻辑，更多地受到地缘政治、国家安全和国内政治权宜之计的影响。

这个地缘经济时代最显著的特征之一，是美国财政部越来越愿意直接干预金融市场的定价。其中一次旨在稳定阿根廷比索的干预实现了其目标。第二次旨在压低长期国债收益率并抑制债券市场波动，但遭遇了挫折。至于第三项旨在支撑日元的举措，其效果尚无定论。

综合来看，这三个例子为非传统的直接市场干预何时能成功——以及更重要的，该工具的信誉何时会被削弱——提供了关键教训。

在阿根廷，比索贬值推高了通胀，并在关键选举前削弱了对总统哈维尔·米莱（Javier Milei）的支持。美国财政部通过向唐纳德·特朗普总统的一位盟友提供美元掉期额度（一种货币交换协议）介入其中。

财政部长斯科特·贝森特（Scott Bessent）将此举定义为遏制区域系统性风险的努力，但市场将其更多地视为一种政治救命稻草。这次干预取得了成功，比索趋于稳定，通胀动态有所缓和。这一成功得益于阿根廷外汇市场规模较小，且米莱的政策立场总体上支持该货币。

随后，美国财政部试图管理国内主权债券收益率的尝试则证明效果差得多。针对收益率的剧烈上涨，贝森特宣布财政部将加大对长期债券的回购计划，并在必要时考虑其他措施。其理由是平抑流动性不足的夏季环境下的“无序”波动。然而，许多市场参与者将其视为在美国中期选举前压低抵押贷款利率的尝试。在接下来的几周里，收益率

这三个案例为非常规直接市场干预提供了关键教训

整个收益率曲线继续飙升，上涨了约 0.5 个百分点。

美国国债市场规模巨大，全球一体化，并受强大的结构性动态驱动，这些动态难以轻易克服。其中包括为弥补占 GDP, 6% 的财政赤字而增加的政府债券发行、以更高利率对到期债务进行再融资，以及为资助科技相关投资而进行的巨额企业借贷。与此同时，一些历史上可靠的买家的需求正在减少。

货币市场中日元的经历处于这两个极端之间。此次干预被定调为缓解全球金融不稳定，并保护美国贸易免受过度低估货币的影响。然而，市场很快意识到了另一个动机：即日本在寻求筹集加元以支撑日元时，需要将出售美债导致美国收益率上升的风险降至最低。虽然日元最初有所升值，但随后又回落。不出所料，这种战术性干预难以克服东京在货币、财政和结构性政策组合方面的根本问题。

当在 Axios 的采访中被问及干预措施时，贝森特（Bessent）宣称：“庄家并非每把都能赢。庄家玩的是概率。”这引用了他之前的说法——“我现在就是庄家”——唤起了关于“庄家总是获胜”的赌场格言。通过赌场经营者的视角来看待主权市场干预，可能会导致对起作用因素的误诊。政策制定者干预定价的能力在很大程度上取决于市场规模和底层基本面状态。

市场干预旨在充当“断路器”，以中断非基本面的、自我强化的市场动态或严重的流动性压力。在真正的市场脱节期间谨慎部署时，它具有巨大的信号价值和效力。但当它被重复用于试图对抗底层市场基本面、实现短期政治目标，或管理深度且流动性强的全球资产类别价格时，其效果可能会减弱。将其作为常规政策杠杆而非紧急安全阀，可能会使市场稳定器变成道德风险和更深波动性的来源。

穆罕默德·埃尔-埃里安（Mohamed El-Erian）是沃顿商学院 Rene M Kern 实践教授，安联保险（Allianz）首席经济顾问，以及 Gramercy Funds Management 主席。

市场日报

Source: LSEG

核心要点

• 中东敌对行动升级，推动布伦特原油基准价格突破 $105
• 上月经由霍尔木兹海峡的运输量有所上升，但此后大幅下降
• 唐纳德·特朗普总统随后与伊朗进行了“富有成效”的讨论

由于中东敌对行动升级，且有迹象表明通过霍尔木兹海峡的航运复苏正在消退，原油价格昨日最高上涨 5%，推动全球原油基准布伦特原油价格突破每桶 $105。

随后价格回落至略低于每桶 $104。来自贸易咨询公司 Kpler 的数据显示，9 月下旬经由霍尔木兹海峡的平均周流量最高达到每日 1500 万桶，几乎达到战前水平的 90%。

但此后这些水平已回落至约每日 1100 万桶。初步数据显示，周二仅有 400 万桶原油通过该海峡。

负责监测航运的英国海事贸易行动（UK Maritime Trade Operations）报告称，在 9 月份发生 13 起袭击之后，10 月第一周在海峡附近发生了 9 起针对船只的袭击。

该机构表示，周三晚上收到通知，一艘油轮在卡塔尔海岸附近遭到多枚抛射物袭击，并有伤亡报告。

独立安全来源称，伊朗在周三晚上向阿曼海岸附近的一艘油轮发射了导弹，这是一个月来首次在海峡以外发生的此类袭击。

沙特阿拉伯表示，周二和周三，伊朗支持的胡塞武装对两座沙特机场发动了分别袭击，造成一名男子和两名女性死亡，数十人受伤。

《大西洋月刊》周三报道称，唐纳德·特朗普总统正在考虑一项在 11 月中期选举前打击伊朗的计划。

在特朗普于其 Truth Social 平台发帖称，美国一直与伊朗进行“富有成效的讨论”，且在选举前“不会发动攻击”后，布伦特原油昨日回吐了部分早前涨幅。

墨西哥湾的一场飓风迫使一些美国生产商停止生产。美国原油基准西德克萨斯中间原油（WTI）昨日上涨 5.1%，至每桶 $92.80。

近期通过霍尔木兹海峡的大部分原油是通过穿梭服务运输的，即由少数油轮穿越该水道，并将货物转移给在海湾外等待的船只。

由此产生的高昂运输成本，以及炼油能力的锐减，推高了原油和精炼产品的价格。布伦特原油目前的交易价格比伊朗战争前夕高出约 45%，而欧洲柴油价格上涨了近 100%。 Verity Ratcliffe, Alice Hancock 和 Ian Smith

市场更新

< / td><>美国< / ><>欧元区< / ><>日本< / ><>英国< / ><>中国< / ><>巴西< / >< / tr><><>股票< / ><>S&P 500< / ><>Eurofirst 300< / ><>Nikkei 225< / ><>FTSE100< / ><>Shanghai Comp< / ><>Bovespa< / >< / ><><>水平< / ><>7758.35< / ><>2498.80< / ><>69042.11< / ><>10441.60< / ><>3811.90< / ><>206725.95< / >< / ><><>当日涨跌幅< / ><>-0.56< / ><>-0.74< / ><>-1.42< / ><>-0.16< / ><>-0.79< / ><>1.19< / >< / ><><>货币< / ><>$ index (DXY)< / ><>$ per €< / ><>Yen per $< / ><>$ £< / ><>Rmb $< / ><>Real $< / >< / ><><>水平< / ><>102.32< / ><>1.121< / ><>158.215< / ><>1.323< / ><>6.70< / ><>5.012< / >< / ><><>当日涨跌幅< / ><>0.08< / ><>0.125< / ><>0.070< / ><>0.057< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.310< / >< / ><><>政府债券< / ><>10-Year

财政部< / td> 10年期德国国债< / ><>10年期日本国债< / ><>10年期英国国债< / ><>10年期债券< / >< / tr> <>收益率< / ><>5.27< / ><>3.47< / ><>3.04< / ><>5.41< / ><>1.69< / ><>12.76< / >< / ><><>当日基点变化< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.01< / ><>-0.19< / >< / ><><>全球 / 大宗商品< / ><>富时全球指数< / ><>原油 - 布伦特< / ><>原油 - WTI< / ><>黄金< / ><>白银< / ><>金属 (LMEX)< / >< / ><><>水平< / ><>750.25< / ><>105.74< / ><>92.88< / ><>4111.46< / ><>58.76< / ><>5806.80< / >< / ><><>当日百分比变化< / ><>-0.67< / ><>4.87< / ><>5.21< / ><>0.12< / ><>-1.90< / ><>0.23< / >< / table>

主要股票市场

最大涨跌幅

<>< rowspan="3">*< / >< colspan="2">美国< / >< / ><><>Chipotle Mexican< / ><>6.52< / >< / ><><>Marathon Petrol< / ><>4.28< / >< / ><>< rowspan="3">上涨< / ><>Philip Morris Intl< / ><>4.13< / >< / ><><>Valero Energy< / ><>3.75< / >< / ><><>Best Buy< / ><>3.38< / >< / ><>< rowspan="5">下跌< / ><>Vistra< / ><>-5.04< / >< / ><><>Starbucks< / ><>-4.80< / >< / ><><>Constellation Energy< / ><>-4.03< / >< / ><><>Eli Lilly< / ><>-3.93< / >< / ><><>Garmin< / ><>-3.85< / >< / table>

价格取自格林威治标准时间 10月08日 17:00

<>< colspan="2">欧元区< / >< / ><><>Repsol< / ><>5.06< / >< / ><><>Verbund AG< / ><>3.01< / >< / ><><>TotalEnergies< / ><>2.86< / >< / ><><>Eni< / ><>2.66< / >< / ><><>Schneider Electric< / ><>2.57< / >< / table>

<><>Nokia< / ><>-4.78< / >< / ><><>Volkswagen< / ><>-4.50< / >< / ><><>Volkswagen pfd< / ><>-4.50< / >< / ><><>Fresenius SE & Co< / ><>-3.92< / >< / ><><>STMicroelectronics< / ><>-3.83< / >< / table>

基于富时欧洲第一 300 欧元区指数成分股 The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

<>< colspan="2">英国< / >< / ><><>Rightmove< / ><>8.91< / >< / ><><>Tesco< / ><>5.17< / >< / ><><>Imperial Brands< / ><>5.06< / >< / ><><>Bridgepoint Group< / ><>4.71< / >< / ><><>Mony Group< / ><>4.27< / >< / ><><>Oxford Nanopore Technologies< / ><>-8.98< / >< / ><><>Unite Group< / ><>-5.07< / >< / ><><>RHI Magnesita< / ><>-4.75< / >< / ><><>Polar Capital Global Healthcare< / ><>-4.02< / >< / ><><>Oxford Instruments< / ><>-4.00< / >< / table>

所有数据由 ICE 提供。www.ice.com

固定收益

马斯克的 SpaceX 因借贷狂潮引发担忧，信用风险激增

凯特·杜盖德 (KATE DUGUID)、米歇尔·陈 (MICHELLE CHAN) 和乔治·斯蒂尔 (GEORGE STEER) —— 纽约

由于这家从火箭转向 AI 的集团计划通过发行 400亿美元 债务来购买英伟达 (Nvidia) 芯片的新计划惊动了投资者，埃隆·马斯克 (Elon Musk) 旗下 SpaceX 的一项信用风险指标升至历史高点，其债券价格随之下跌。

在《金融时报》(FT) 报道了该融资计划后，SpaceX 的五年期信用违约互换 (CDS) 利差在周三升至 194 个基点，这意味着目前为 $1mn 的债务提供违约保护每年需支付 $19,400。

该 CDS 在 6 月开始交易时约为 110 个基点。根据 Market-Axess 的数据，投资者还在抛售 SpaceX 的债务，导致其 2056 年到期债券相对于美国国债的收益率在周三上涨 0.09 个百分点，至 2.36 个百分点。

所谓的利差（衡量投资者持有该债券而非超低风险美国政府债务所要求的溢价）在 6 月份记录为 1.75 个百分点。

据《金融时报》周二报道，SpaceX 正寻求通过 100亿美元 的银行贷款和 300亿美元 的投资级债务来资助其芯片采购。私募股权公司阿波罗 (Apollo) 预计将主导此次交易，而债券巨头品格 (Pimco) 则是正在洽谈提供资金的贷款机构之一。

此前该公司在 6 月发行了

“昨晚我问了一屋子的客户‘谁持有 SpaceX 的股票？’没有一个人举手”

250亿美元 的投资级债务，而就在几周前，该公司在历史性的首次公开募股 (IPO) 中筹集了 860亿美元。此次新的债务交易表明，马斯克正在加大对英伟达技术的押注。

摩根士丹利 (Morgan Stanley) 分析师亚当·乔纳斯 (Adam Jonas) 表示，一些投资者怀疑马斯克的公司能否成为“前沿 AI 模型的主要供应商”取得成功，或者在“任何时间范围内启动任何规模的轨道计算”。

乔纳斯在给客户的一份报告中写道：“我经常向大批客户做演示，并询问在场的人‘谁持有 [SpaceX] 的股票？’昨晚，我在 40 位客户面前这样做时，没有一个人举手。”

此次 400亿美元 的融资努力是硅谷领先科技集团为资助全美 AI 基础设施建设而进行的一系列巨额债务交易中的最新一次。

Alphabet、Meta、甲骨文 (Oracle) 和亚马逊 (Amazon) 等公司已在公开和私募市场发行了数千亿美元的债券和贷款。其他借入巨额资金资助 AI 项目的科技集团的 CDS 也承受了压力。

甲骨文的五年期 CDS 成本自上月初以来上涨了 40 个基点，至 244 个基点。芯片制造商英伟达的同类 CDS 已从 7 月初的 45 个基点升至约 81 个基点。

Alphabet、Meta 和微软 (Microsoft) 的等效合约在过去几周内也大幅飙升，目前的报价接近历史高点。

当日 ▷ -1.35% 本月 ▷ -4.93% 本年 ▷ 14.08%

< / td><>指数< / ><>全球指数< / >< / tr><>< colspan="3">Sep 08 - Oct 08< / >< / ><>< colspan="3">法兰克福 Xetra Dax< / >< / ><><>< / ><>26007.63< / ><>24806.97< / >< / table>

过去 30 天的股市走势，以相同货币的富时全球指数 (FTSE All-World) 作为对比

全球市场概览

前一交易日涨跌幅 (%)

道琼斯 Ind

富时 100

富时 EuroFirst

-0.16%

Sep 08 - Oct 08< / td>< / tr><><>S&P 500< / ><>纽约< / >< / ><><>Index< / ><>All World< / >< / ><><>7673.52< / ><>7758.35< / >< / table>

<><>当日 ↩ -0.56%< / ><>当月 ↗ 1.49%< / ><>当年 ↗ 15.32%< / >< / ><>< colspan="2">Nasdaq Composite< / ><>纽约< / >< / table>

当日 ▷ -0.16% 当月 ▷ -3.31% 当年 ▷ 9.52%

<><>国家< / ><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚< / ><>All Ordinaries< / ><>8923.20< / ><>8694.60< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚< / ><>S&P ASX 200< / ><>8660.90< / ><>8727.70< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚< / ><>S&P ASX 200 Res< / ><>7677.40< / ><>7794.00< / >< / ><><>奥地利< / ><>ATX< / ><>6560.57< / ><>6611.99< / >< / ><><>比利时< / ><>BEL 20< / ><>5399.40< / ><>5527.87< / >< / ><><>比利时< / ><>BEL Mid< / ><>6352.88< / ><>6408.21< / >< / ><><>巴西< / ><>Bovespa< / ><>206725.95< / ><>204302.33< / >< / ><><>加拿大< / ><>S&P TSX 60< / ><>2063.17< / ><>2064.92< / >< / ><><>加拿大< / ><>S&P TSX Comp< / ><>35010.31< / ><>35041.86< / >< / ><><>智利< / ><>SS&P / OLX IGPA GEN< / ><>56930.02< / ><>56920.02< / >< / ><><>中国< / ><>China FSE A300< / ><>10894.94< / ><>11022.05< / >< / ><><>< / ><> Shanghai A< / ><>3985.51< / ><>4028.34< / >< / ><><>< / ><> Shanghai B< / ><>328.19< / ><>3365.56< / >< / ><><>< / ><> Shanghai Comp< / ><>3811.90< / ><>3845.29< / >< / ><><>< / ><>Shenzhen A< / ><>2474.90< / ><>2515.90< / >< / ><><>< / ><>Shenzhen B< / ><>1154.28< / ><>1161.63< / >< / ><><>克罗地亚< / ><>CROBEX< / ><>4490.61< / ><>4496.15< / >< / ><><>塞浦路斯< / ><>CSE M&P GEN< / ><>305.30< / ><>314.00< / >< / table>

<><>< / ><>当日< / ><>%< / ><>当月< / ><>%< / ><>当年< / >< / ><><>< / >< colspan="2">Bovespa< / >< colspan="3">圣保罗< / >< / ><><>< / >< colspan="2">187366.84< / >< colspan="3">206725.95< / >< / table>

<><>国家< / ><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / ><><>捷克共和国< / ><>Czech Republic PX< / ><>2545.27< / ><>2565.99< / >< / ><><>丹麦< / ><>OMC Copenhagen 20< / ><>1485.16< / ><>1509.01< / >< / ><><>埃及< / ><>ESEA 30< / ><>5326.20< / >< / ><><>爱沙尼亚< / ><>OMX Tallinn< / ><>2228.71< / ><>2229.77< / >< / ><><>芬兰< / ><>OMK Helsinki General< / ><>13865.05< / ><>13630.87< / >< / ><><>法国< / ><>French CAC40< / ><>7729.69< / ><>7769.21< / >< / ><><>Sregion< / ><>SBF 120< / ><>5860.44< / ><>5897.00< / >< / ><><>德国< / ><>M-DAX< / ><>29506.83< / ><>30112.41< / >< / ><><>德国< / ><>Tec-Dax< / ><>3965.53< / ><>4048.53< / >< / ><><>德国< / ><>XETRA Dax< / ><>24806.97< / ><>25104.36< / >< / ><><>希腊< / ><>Athens< / ><>2568.05< / ><>2622.02< / >< / ><><>希腊< / ><>FTSE / ASIA< / ><>6577.49< / ><>6722.56< / >< / ><><>香港< / ><>Hang Seng< / ><>23765.79< / ><>24130.50< / >< / ><><>香港< / ><>HS Enterprises< / ><>8010.50< / ><>8082.40< / >< / ><><>香港< / ><>HSCC Red Chip< / ><>4029.81< / ><>4008.30< / >< / ><><>匈牙利< / ><>Bux< / ><>137165.79< / ><>141308.07< / >< / ><><>印度< / ><>BSE Sensex< / ><>71593.24< / ><>72638.70< / >< / ><><>印度尼西亚< / ><>Jakarta Comp< / ><>6037.28< / ><>6146.72< / >< / table>

Nikkei

股票市场：最大涨跌幅

恒生指数 \$ 对 € 0.1251%

当日 ▷ -0.51% 当月 ▷ -2.60% 当年 ▷ -3.78%

国家< / td><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / tr><><>爱尔兰< / ><>ISED Overall< / ><>14053.78< / ><>14344.11< / >< / ><><>以色列< / ><>特拉维夫 125< / ><>3934.01< / ><>3832.42< / >< / ><><>意大利< / ><>富时意大利全股指数< / ><>51818.10< / ><>52533.03< / >< / ><><>意大利< / ><>富时意大利中盘股指数< / ><>59077.62< / ><>59769.58< / >< / ><><>意大利< / ><>富时 MIB< / ><>49297.88< / ><>49972.25< / >< / ><><>日本< / ><>日经 225< / ><>69042.11< / ><>70035.71< / >< / ><><>日本< / ><>东证指数 (Topix)< / ><>4091.46< / ><>4154.11< / >< / ><><>科威特< / ><>KSK 市场指数< / ><>8860.03< / ><>8918.53< / >< / ><><>拉脱维亚< / ><>OMX 里加< / ><>977.66< / ><>982.54< / >< / ><><>立陶宛< / ><>OMX Virus< / ><>1505.51< / ><>1508.72< / >< / ><><>卢森堡< / ><>Lux< / ><>1747.59< / ><>1774.59< / >< / ><><>墨西哥< / ><>墨西哥城 IPC< / ><>64723.28< / ><>64653.33< / >< / ><><>马来西亚< / ><>富时吉隆坡综合指数< / ><>1601.01< / ><>1611.78< / >< / ><><>摩洛哥< / ><>MASI< / ><>16749.18< / ><>16990.77< / >< / ><><>荷兰< / ><>AEX< / ><>1121.20< / ><>1117.75< / >< / ><><>荷兰< / ><>AEX 全股指数< / ><>1530.83< / ><>1521.75< / >< / ><><>新西兰< / ><>NZX 50< / ><>13691.85< / ><>13684.04< / >< / ><><>尼日利亚< / ><>SE 全股指数< / ><>248402.50< / ><>250396.75< / >< / table>

欧洲市场 活跃股票

<><>国家< / ><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / ><><>挪威< / ><>Dolo 全股指数< / ><>2452.58< / ><>2444.94< / >< / ><><>巴基斯坦< / ><>KSE 100< / ><>167441.00< / ><>168580.41< / >< / ><><>菲律宾< / ><>马尼拉综合指数< / ><>5610.39< / ><>5736.69< / >< / ><><>波兰< / ><>Wig< / ><>155764.56< / ><>156686.10< / >< / ><><>葡萄牙< / ><>PSI 20< / ><>9347.66< / ><>9333.76< / >< / ><><>葡萄牙< / ><>PSI General< / ><>6354.43< / ><>6345.98< / >< / ><><>罗马尼亚< / ><>罗马尼亚 BET 指数< / ><>33557.95< / ><>33562.51< / >< / ><><>俄罗斯< / ><>俄罗斯美元交易指数< / ><>988.10< / >< / ><><>沙特阿拉伯< / ><>TAHAR / UL 全股指数< / ><>10376.28< / ><>10542.23< / >< / ><><>新加坡< / ><>富时 Strata Times< / ><>5412.96< / ><>5608.44< / >< / ><><>斯洛伐克< / ><>SAX< / ><>320.00< / ><>320.42< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">南非< / ><>SBI TOP< / ><>3104.77< / ><>3117.11< / >< / ><><>富时 / JSE 全股指数< / ><>107109.29< / ><>107104.29< / >< / ><><>南非< / ><>富时 / JSE Res< / ><>64600.65< / ><>64609.32< / >< / ><><>南非< / ><>富时 / JSE Top 40< / ><>99406.91< / ><>99394.06< / >< / ><><>韩国< / ><>Kospi< / ><>6625.93< / ><>6803.90< / >< / ><><>韩国< / ><>Kospi 200< / ><>1044.52< / ><>1073.63< / >< / ><><>西班牙< / ><>西班牙 BRX 35< / ><>18928.90< / ><>19118.00< / >< / table>

英国市场涨跌榜

富时全球指数

\$ 对 £ 0.0567% ¥ 对 \$ 0.0696%

当日 ▷ -0.79% 当月 ▷ -3.26% 当年 ▷ 5.58%

国家< / td><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / tr><><>瑞典< / ><>DMX Stockholm 30< / ><>3202.44< / ><>3226.82< / >< / ><><>瑞典< / ><>DMX Stockholm AS< / ><>1104.05< / ><>1112.14< / >< / ><><>瑞士< / ><>SMI Index< / ><>13637.00< / ><>13808.42< / >< / ><><>台湾< / ><>加权股价指数< / ><>49313.44< / ><>49806.37< / >< / ><><>泰国< / ><>曼谷 SET< / ><>1570.61< / ><>1584.63< / >< / ><><>土耳其< / ><>BIST 100< / ><>12213.58< / ><>12122.94< / >< / ><><>英国< / ><>富时 100 指数< / ><>10441.60< / ><>10458.50< / >< / ><><>英国< / ><>富时 4Good UK 指数< / ><>9960.32< / ><>9990.61< / >< / ><><>英国< / ><>富时全股指数< / ><>5634.04< / ><>5644.81< / >< / ><><>英国< / ><>富时 techMARK 100 指数< / ><>9420.03< / ><>9493.63< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>道琼斯综合指数< / ><>15978.69< / ><>15976.75< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>道琼斯工业平均指数< / ><>51100.26< / ><>51179.67< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>道琼斯运输指数< / ><>19670.24< / ><>19529.30< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>道琼斯公用事业指数< / ><>404.43< / ><>407.78< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>纳斯达克 100 指数< / ><>30958.38< / ><>31160.08< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>纳斯达克综合指数< / ><>27368.68< / ><>27538.69< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>纽约证交所综合指数< / ><>23679.42< / ><>23701.92< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>标准普尔 500 指数< / ><>7758.35< / ><>7801.77< / >< / table>

FT.COM / MARKETSDATA

英镑 / 欧元 0.0709%

当日 ▷ -1.44% 当月 ▷ -5.27% 当年 ▷ -12.45%

活跃股票< / td><>成交量（百万股）< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日涨跌< / >< / tr><><>日本电报电话公司 (Nippon Tel & Tel)< / ><>169.67< / ><>172.10< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>东京海上控股 (Tokio Marine Hldgs)< / ><>103.75< / ><>518.10< / ><>2.10< / >< / ><><>软银公司 (SoftBank Corp)< / ><>70.13< / ><>241.30< / ><>0.60< / >< / ><><>软银集团 (SoftBank Grp Corp)< / ><>37.80< / ><>6040.00< / ><>-270.00< / >< / ><><>三菱日联金融集团 (Mitsubishi UFJ)< / ><>36.87< / ><>3504.00< / ><>-118.00< / >< / ><><>日产汽车 (Nissan Motor Co)< / ><>35.39< / ><>283.00< / ><>-2.10< / >< / ><><>东京电力 (Tokyo Electric Power)< / ><>34.77< / ><>514.60< / ><>-2.30< / >< / ><><>新日铁 (Nippon Steel)< / ><>30.63< / ><>631.30< / ><>-9.90< / >< / ><><>太阳诱电 (Taiyo Yuden)< / ><>30.20< / ><>10955.00< / ><>-505.00< / >< / ><><>藤仓 (Fujikura)< / ><>29.77< / ><>5512.00< / ><>-188.00< / >< / ><><>最大涨跌幅< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日< / >< / table>

<><>富时100指数 (FTSE 100)< / ><>价格(£)< / ><>周涨跌幅(%)< / ><>年初至今涨跌幅(%)< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">上涨股< / >< / ><><>帝国品牌 (Imperial Brands)< / ><>26.14< / ><>7.84< / ><>-16.19< / >< / ><><>Experian< / ><>25.74< / ><>6.06< / ><>-23.46< / >< / ><><>Autotrader Group< / ><>4.86< / ><>5.54< / ><>-17.14< / >< / ><><>Tosco< / ><>5.00< / ><>5.39< / ><>13.26< / >< / ><><>壳牌 (Shell)< / ><>37.80< / ><>5.34< / ><>37.97< / >< / ><><>Compass< / ><>23.25< / ><>5.25< / ><>-1.65< / >< / ><><>Haleon< / ><>3.44< / ><>5.03< / ><>-8.14< / >< / ><><>8P< / ><>5.85< / ><>4.97< / ><>35.12< / >< / ><><>Bund< / ><>27.10< / ><>4.96< / ><>30.54< / >< / ><><>The Sage Grp< / ><>10.28< / ><>4.93< / ><>-5.12< / >< / table>

<><>活跃股票< / ><>成交量（百万股）< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日涨跌< / >< / ><><>联合圣保罗银行 (Intesa Sanpaolo)< / ><>73.20< / ><>6.06< / ><>-0.18< / >< / ><><> Stellantis< / ><>46.16< / ><>4.00< / ><>-0.12< / >< / ><><>桑坦德银行 (Banco Santander)< / ><>27.14< / ><>11.91< / ><>-0.35< / >< / ><><>国家电力公司 (Enel)< / ><>23.73< / ><>8.76< / ><>0.03< / >< / ><><>萨巴代尔银行 (Banco De Sabadell)< / ><>17.44< / ><>3.51< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>皇家KPN (Royal KPN)< / ><>11.74< / ><>3.95< / ><>-0.01< / >< / ><><>ING集团 (ING Group)< / ><>10.78< / ><>29.43< / ><>-0.81< / >< / ><><>诺基亚 (Nokia)< / ><>10.76< / ><>9.09< / ><>-0.46< / >< / ><><>埃尼 (Eni)< / ><>10.74< / ><>24.88< / ><>0.65< / >< / ><><>伊比德罗拉 (Iberdrola)< / ><>10.37< / ><>21.11< / ><>0.18< / >< / ><><>最大涨跌幅< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日< / >< / table>

<><>国家 / 地区< / ><>指数< / ><>最新< / ><>前值< / >< / ><><>委内瑞拉< / ><>IBC< / ><>8595.50< / ><>7602.12< / >< / ><><>越南< / ><>越南指数 (Viet Nam Index)< / ><>1739.97< / ><>1753.39< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>欧洲斯托克 50 (Euro Stoxx 50 (Eur))< / ><>6126.73< / ><>6180.29< / >< / ><><>荷兰< / ><>泛欧交易所 100 指数 (Euronext 100 ID)< / ><>1949.99< / ><>1857.43< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>富时全球食品指数 ($) (FTSE Food Global ($))< / ><>21172.99< / ><>21349.40< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>富时全球指数 ($) ( All World ($))< / ><>749.49< / ><>755.28< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>富时 €300 ( €300)< / ><>2468.80< / ><>2517.48< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>富时欧洲顶尖 100 指数 ( Eurotop 100)< / ><>4829.01< / ><>4884.26< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>富时全球 100 指数 ($) ( Global 100 ($))< / ><>5679.71< / ><>5937.77< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>富时黄金矿业 ( Gold Min< / >< / table>

($)< / td> 5388.38< / ><>5388.38< / >< / tr> <>跨境< / ><>FTSE Limbase Top (欧元)< / ><>7156.60< / ><>7164.60< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>FTSE World ($)< / ><>1404.70< / ><>1414.95< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>FT$ / Eurofirst 100 (欧元)< / ><>6941.84< / ><>6982.68< / >< / ><><>跨境< / ><>FT$ / Eurofirst 80 ID< / ><>8362.32< / ><>8431.25< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="4">美洲< / >< / ><><>活跃股票< / ><>成交量（百万股）< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日涨跌< / >< / ><><>英特尔 (Intel)< / ><>48.05< / ><>109.56< / ><>-3.56< / >< / ><><>英伟达 (Nvidia)< / ><>40.28< / ><>235.54< / ><>-1.93< / >< / ><><>Palantir< / ><>28.64< / ><>198.38< / ><>4.26< / >< / ><><>超微电脑 (Super Micro Computer)< / ><>19.12< / ><>43.15< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>星巴克 (Starbucks)< / ><>16.28< / ><>89.09< / ><>-4.49< / >< / ><><>奈飞 (Netflix)< / ><>15.67< / ><>71.09< / ><>1.39< / >< / ><><>特斯拉 (Tesla)< / ><>12.15< / ><>373.12< / ><>-4.68< / >< / ><><>美光科技 (Micron Technology)< / ><>11.78< / ><>1072.73< / ><>-15.27< / >< / ><><>亚马逊 (Amazon.com)< / ><>11.39< / ><>259.00< / ><>-0.92< / >< / ><><>谷歌 A 类股 (Alphabet CI A)< / ><>10.56< / ><>349.27< / ><>-1.23< / >< / ><><>最大涨跌幅< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日< / >< / table>

<><>活跃股票< / ><>成交量（百万股）< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日涨跌< / >< / ><><>劳埃德银行集团 (Lloyds Bkg Gp)< / ><>234.13< / ><>1.01< / ><>-0.02< / >< / ><><>沃达丰 (Vodafone)< / ><>45.97< / ><>1.24< / ><>-0.03< / >< / ><><>巴克莱 (Barclays)< / ><>39.56< / ><>4.26< / ><>-0.06< / >< / ><><>英国石油 (BP)< / ><>35.38< / ><>5.85< / ><>0.23< / >< / ><><>Haleon< / ><>33.15< / ><>3.44< / ><>0.02< / >< / ><><>泰勒·温皮 (Taylor Wimpey)< / ><>33.08< / ><>0.74< / ><>-0.03< / >< / ><><>国民西敏寺银行集团 (NatWest Group)< / ><>32.74< / ><>6.40< / ><>-0.10< / >< / ><><>嘉能可 (Glencore)< / ><>31.96< / ><>5.69< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>特易购 (Tesco)< / ><>30.09< / ><>5.00< / ><>0.25< / >< / ><><>汇丰 (HSBC)< / ><>24.50< / ><>13.81< / ><>-0.27< / >< / table>

<><>富时 250 指数 (FTSE 250)< / ><>价格(£)< / ><>周涨跌幅%< / ><>年初至今涨跌幅%< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">上涨者< / >< / ><><>Wetherspoon (JD)< / ><>10.02< / ><>23.25< / ><>35.86< / >< / ><><>Avon Technologies< / ><>22.55< / ><>22.69< / ><>24.31< / >< / ><><>Bridgepoint Group< / ><>3.83< / ><>13.60< / ><>34.81< / >< / ><><>Rightmove< / ><>5.03< / ><>11.61< / ><>-3.27< / >< / ><><>Ocado Group< / ><>2.84< / ><>9.83< / ><>20.25< / >< / ><><>Baltic Classifieds Group< / ><>1.88< / ><>8.14< / ><>-7.33< / >< / ><><>Mony Group< / ><>1.85< / ><>7.35< / ><>0.92< / >< / ><><>W.A.G Payment Solutions< / ><>0.99< / ><>6.11< / ><>-5.71< / >< / ><><>Clarkson< / ><>52.65< / ><>5.89< / ><>38.01< / >< / ><><>达美乐比萨 (Domino's Pizza)< / ><>2.23< / ><>5.39< / ><>28.60< / >< / table>

<><>公司名称< / ><>价格< / ><>涨跌< / ><>涨跌%< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">上涨< / >< / ><><>奇波雷墨西哥风味 (Chipotle Mexican)< / ><>32.77< / ><>2.00< / ><>6.52< / >< / ><><>马拉松石油 (Marathon Petrol)< / ><>461.20< / ><>18.94< / ><>4.28< / >< / ><><>菲利普莫里斯国际 (Philip Morris Intl)< / ><>200.65< / ><>7.96< / ><>4.13< / >< / ><><>瓦莱罗能源 (Valero Energy)< / ><>440.00< / ><>15.90< / ><>3.75< / >< / ><><>百思买 (Best Buy)< / ><>87.45< / ><>2.86< / ><>3.38< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">下跌< / >< / ><><>Vistra< / ><>158.31< / ><>-8.41< / ><>-5.04< / >< / ><><>星巴克 (Starbucks)< / ><>89.09< / ><>-4.49< / ><>-4.80< / >< / ><><>星座能源 (Constellation Energy)< / ><>287.50< / ><>-12.09< / ><>-4.03< / >< / ><><>礼来 (Eli Lilly)< / ><>1142.00< / ><>-46.72< / ><>-3.93< / >< / ><><>佳明 (Garmin)< / ><>265.54< / ><>-10.62< / ><>-3.85< / >< / table>

富时小盘股指数 (FTSE Small Cap)< / td><>价格(£)< / ><>周涨跌幅(%)< / ><>年初至今涨跌幅(%)< / >< / tr><>< colspan="4">上涨者< / >< / ><><>Kenmare Resources< / ><>2.38< / ><>25.13< / ><>-3.64< / >< / ><><>Blackrock Latin American Inv Tst< / ><>4.60< / ><>14.43< / ><>13.86< / >< / ><><>Synthomer< / ><>1.08< / ><>8.36< / ><>69.98< / >< / ><><>Eurocell< / ><>1.47< / ><>8.09< / ><>12.64< / >< / ><><>Aston Martin Lagonda< / ><>0.36< / ><>7.70< / ><>-42.79< / >< / ><><>Brown Advisory US Smaller Co's< / ><>16.57< / ><>6.94< / ><>19.24< / >< / ><><>Ultico Emerging Mkts< / ><>2.95< / ><>5.36< / ><>9.67< / >< / ><><>Ashtead Technology< / ><>5.50< / ><>4.56< / ><>77.42< / >< / ><><>ASA International< / ><>2.39< / ><>4.37< / ><>26.12< / >< / ><><>Castings< / ><>2.87< / ><>4.36< / ><>5.51< / >< / table>

货币

<><>行业板块< / ><>价格(£)< / ><>周涨跌幅(%)< / ><>年初至今涨跌幅(%)< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">上涨者< / >< / ><><>房地产投资与服务< / ><>1981.42< / ><>5.78< / ><>-7.48< / >< / ><><>消费者数字服务< / ><>175.08< / ><>5.35< / ><>-8.41< / >< / ><><>消费者服务< / ><>4078.45< / ><>5.25< / ><>-1.65< / >< / ><><>石油、天然气与煤炭< / ><>11885.96< / ><>5.16< / ><>36.75< / >< / ><><>能源< / ><>12495.69< / ><>5.12< / ><>36.78< / >< / ><><>烟草< / ><>45440.77< / ><>5.06< / ><>-4.37< / >< / ><><>金融与信贷服务< / ><>13577.32< / ><>3.94< / ><>-6.25< / >< / ><><>个人护理、药品与杂货< / ><>4585.17< / ><>3.58< / ><>-2.86< / >< / ><><>消费者必需品< / ><>17999.70< / ><>3.52< / ><>-1.83< / >< / ><><>软件与计算机服务< / ><>1859.04< / ><>3.34< / ><>-8.96< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="4">广播行情 (Brodeast RIOVERS)< / >< / ><><>< / ><>收盘价< / ><>当日涨跌< / ><>当日涨跌幅(%)< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">上涨< / >< / ><><>Rightmove< / ><>5.03< / ><>0.41< / ><>8.91< / >< / ><><>Tesco< / ><>5.00< / ><>0.25< / ><>5.17< / >< / ><><>Imperial Brands< / ><>26.14< / ><>1.26< / ><>5.06< / >< / ><><>Bridgepoint Group< / ><>3.83< / ><>0.17< / ><>4.71< / >< / ><><>Mony Group< / ><>1.85< / ><>0.08< / ><>4.27< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">下跌< / >< / ><><>Oxford Nanopore Technologies< / ><>2.01< / ><>-0.20< / ><>-8.98< / >< / ><><>Unite Group< / ><>4.20< / ><>-0.22< / ><>-5.07< / >< / ><><>RHI Magnesita< / ><>27.05< / ><>-1.35< / ><>-4.75< / >< / ><><>Polar Capital Global Healthcare< / ><>4.17< / ><>-0.17< / ><>-4.02< / >< / ><><>Oxford Instruments< / ><>29.26< / ><>-1.22< / ><>-4.00< / >< / table>

<><>下跌者< / ><>< / ><>下跌者< / >< / ><><>IG Group< / ><>9.63< / ><>-24.71< / ><>-26.77< / ><>Pennon< / >< / ><><>Lion Finance< / ><>123.70< / ><>-8.64< / ><>33.01< / ><>Vistry< / >< / ><><>Barratt Redrow< / ><>2.91< / ><>-8.28< / ><>-23.54< / ><>Inchca< / >< / ><><>3i Group< / ><>23.52< / ><>-7.55< / ><>-27.92< / ><>RHI Ma< / >< / ><><>Rolls-Royce< / ><>13.67< / ><>-7.12< / ><>18.87< / ><>Taylor< / >< / ><><>Balfour Beatty< / ><>8.66< / ><>-5.87< / ><>21.80< / ><>Unite G< / >< / ><><>Melrose Ind< / ><>4.38< / ><>-5.84< / ><>-25.51< / ><>Chemr< / >< / ><><>BAE SYSTEMS< / ><>18.36< / ><>-5.48< / ><>7.15< / ><>Hill & Co< / >< / ><><>Standard Chartered< / ><>21.08< / ><>-4.96< / ><>15.70< / ><>Shawd< / >< / ><><>Babcock Intl< / ><>9.05< / ><>-4.70< / ><>-27.22< / ><>Breed< / >< / table>

涨跌幅最大< / td><>收盘价< / ><>当日涨跌< / ><>当日涨跌%< / >< / tr><>< colspan="4">上涨< / >< / ><><>Repsol< / ><>30.09< / ><>1.45< / ><>5.06< / >< / ><><>Verbund AG< / ><>65.00< / ><>1.90< / ><>3.01< / >< / ><><>TotalEnergies< / ><>77.58< / ><>2.16< / ><>2.86< / >< / ><><>Eni< / ><>24.88< / ><>0.65< / ><>2.66< / >< / ><><>Schneider Electric< / ><>261.10< / ><>6.55< / ><>2.57< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">下跌< / >< / ><><>Nokia< / ><>9.09< / ><>-0.46< / ><>-4.78< / >< / ><><>Volkswagen< / ><>66.90< / ><>-3.15< / ><>-4.50< / >< / ><><>Volkswagen pfd< / ><>66.60< / ><>-3.14< / ><>-4.50< / >< / ><><>Fresenius SE & Co< / ><>41.59< / ><>-1.70< / ><>-3.92< / >< / ><><>STMicroelectronics< / ><>47.98< / ><>-1.91< / ><>-3.83< / >< / table>

<><>公司名称< / ><>价格< / ><>涨跌< / ><>涨跌%< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">上涨< / >< / ><><>Trend Micro< / ><>7232.00< / ><>271.00< / ><>3.89< / >< / ><><>Nomura Research Ins< / ><>5341.00< / ><>152.00< / ><>2.93< / >< / ><><>Ricoh< / ><>1709.50< / ><>39.00< / ><>2.33< / >< / ><><>Yamato Hldgs< / ><>2024.00< / ><>41.50< / ><>2.09< / >< / ><><>Nippon Yusen KK< / ><>7226.00< / ><>134.00< / ><>1.89< / >< / ><>< colspan="4">下跌< / >< / ><><>Sumco< / ><>3473.00< / ><>-211.00< / ><>-5.73< / >< / ><><>Komatsu< / ><>7397.00< / ><>-432.00< / ><>-5.52< / >< / ><><>Kubota Corp< / ><>2624.50< / ><>-150.50< / ><>-5.42< / >< / ><><>Sumitomo Heavy Ind< / ><>5893.00< / ><>-331.00< / ><>-5.32< / >< / ><><>Furukawa Electric< / ><>4220.00< / ><>-224.00< / ><>-5.04< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="5">下跌榜< / >< / ><><>7< / ><>Pennon Group< / ><>3.71< / ><>-16.37< / ><>-29.67< / >< / ><><>1< / ><>Vistry Group< / ><>2.17< / ><>-13.12< / ><>-66.14< / >< / ><><>4< / ><>Inchcape< / ><>6.58< / ><>-11.44< / ><>-14.43< / >< / ><><>2< / ><>RHI Magnesita< / ><>27.05< / ><>-11.31< / ><>-2.70< / >< / ><><>7< / ><>Taylor Wimpey< / ><>0.74< / ><>-8.49< / ><>-30.79< / >< / ><><>0< / ><>Unite Group< / ><>4.20< / ><>-7.90< / ><>-24.97< / >< / ><><>1< / ><>Chemring Group< / ><>4.99< / ><>-7.59< / ><>5.61< / >< / ><><>5< / ><>Hill & Smith< / ><>30.00< / ><>-7.55< / ><>40.19< / >< / ><><>0< / ><>Shawbrook Group< / ><>2.80< / ><>-7.28< / ><>-42.39< / >< / ><><>2< / ><>Breedon Group< / ><>2.96< / ><>-6.62< / ><>-10.09< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="4">下跌榜< / >< / ><><>7< / ><>The Smarter Web Company< / ><>0.61< / ><>-20.00< / >< / ><><>4< / ><>Hostelworld Group< / ><>0.90< / ><>-11.37< / >< / ><><>3< / ><>Biotech Growth Trust< / ><>13.64< / ><>-9.07< / >< / ><><>0< / ><>ASOS< / ><>4.62< / ><>-8.61< / >< / ><><>9< / ><>Mobico Group< / ><>0.22< / ><>-8.56< / >< / ><><>7< / ><>Marshalls< / ><>1.56< / ><>-8.34< / >< / ><><>1< / ><>Ibstock< / ><>0.75< / ><>-8.00< / >< / ><><>9< / ><>Vanquis Banking Gp< / ><>0.69< / ><>-6.53< / >< / ><><>9< / ><>Forterra< / ><>1.41< / ><>-6.11< / >< / ><><>9< / ><>Helical< / ><>1.75< / ><>-5.91< / >< / table>

输家< / td>< / tr><><>86.74< / ><>替代能源< / ><>38.13< / ><>-10.57< / ><>73.42< / >< / ><><>27.68< / ><>航空航天与国防< / ><>22377.82< / ><>-6.42< / ><>11.46< / >< / ><><>13.67< / ><>家用商品与家居建设< / ><>7960.09< / ><>-5.84< / ><>-26.20< / >< / ><><>62.79< / ><>建筑与材料< / ><>15537.94< / ><>-4.49< / ><>13.48< / >< / ><><>5.46< / ><>投资银行与经纪业务< / ><>14007.68< / ><>-4.29< / ><>-9.46< / >< / ><><>13.62< / ><>工业< / ><>11202.70< / ><>-3.44< / ><>7.11< / >< / ><><>16.02< / ><>银行< / ><>8585.34< / ><>-3.39< / ><>8.33< / >< / ><><>42.56< / ><>休闲商品< / ><>38462.16< / ><>-3.22< / ><>-14.25< / >< / ><><>23.73< / ><>贵金属与采矿< / ><>32686.38< / ><>-3.04< / ><>-5.32< / >< / ><><>11.63< / ><>金融（不含投资公司）< / ><>197.74< / ><>-2.78< / ><>3.83< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">Oct 08< / >< colspan="3">美元< / >< colspan="3">欧元< / >< colspan="2">英镑< / >< / ><><>收盘中间价< / ><>当日涨跌< / ><>周涨跌< / ><>收盘中间价< / ><>当日涨跌< / ><>周涨跌< / ><>收盘中间价< / ><>当日涨跌< / >< / ><><>阿根廷比索< / ><>1519.2757< / ><>-3.2705< / ><>-5.7676< / ><>1702.7482< / ><>-1.5340< / ><>-15.1567< / ><>2009.4039< / ><>-3.1838< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚美元< / ><>1.4363< / ><>< / ><>-0.0077< / ><>1.8098< / ><>0.0021< / ><>-0.0168< / ><>1.8997< / ><>0.0010< / >< / ><><>巴林第纳尔< / ><>0.3772< / ><>0.0001< / ><>0.0002< / ><>0.4238< / ><>0.0006< / ><>-0.0018< / ><>0.4980< / ><>< / >< / ><><>玻利维亚玻利维亚诺< / ><>11.8500< / ><>-0.1200< / ><>-0.1750< / ><>13.2815< / ><>0.1177< / ><>-0.2308< / ><>16.0334< / ><>-0.1497< / >< / ><><>巴西雷亚尔< / ><>5.0120< / ><>0.0155< / ><>-0.2077< / ><>5.8174< / ><>0.0243< / ><>-0.2625< / ><>6.6292< / ><>0.0243< / >< / ><><>加拿大元< / ><>1.4228< / ><>-0.0020< / ><>-0.0017< / ><>1.5947< / ><>0.0003< / ><>-0.0101< / ><>1.8000< / ><>-0.0015< / >< / ><><>人民币< / ><>980.2300< / ><>1.5700< / ><>-3.7988< / ><>1089.1100< / ><>3.5702< / ><>-9.8506< / ><>121.4994< / ><>3.5398< / >< / ><><>人民币< / ><>6.7015< / ><>-0.0039< / ><>7.5111< / ><>0.0051< / ><>-0.0425< / ><>8.9637< / ><>-0.0001< / >< / ><><>哥伦比亚比索< / ><>3224.9000< / ><>-13.7500< / ><>-88.0700< / ><>3614.6680< / ><>-10.8769< / ><>-117.5928< / ><>4265.4142< / ><>-15.7575< / >< / ><><>哥斯达黎加科朗< / ><>456.5000< / ><>0.1350< / ><>< / ><>511.6454< / ><>0.7952< / ><>-2.5619< / ><>603.7903< / ><>0.5208< / >< / ><><>捷克克朗< / ><>21.7577< / ><>-0.0669< / ><>0.0231< / ><>24.3850< / ><>0.0445< / ><>-0.0908< / ><>28.7113< / ><>-0.0767< / >< / ><><>丹麦克朗< / ><>6.6692< / ><>-0.0080< / ><>0.3347< / ><>7.4749< / ><>0.0004< / ><>-0.0003< / ><>8.8211< / ><>-0.0055< / >< / ><><>埃及镑< / ><>52.4000< / ><>0.0300< / ><>0.0500< / ><>56.7259< / ><>0.1069< / ><>-0.2423< / ><>68.3066< / ><>0.0790< / >< / ><><>港元< / ><>7.8483< / ><>0.0001< / ><>0.0010< / ><>8.7856< / ><>0.0111< / ><>-0.0457< / ><>10.3686< / ><>0.0068< / >< / ><><>匈牙利福林< / ><>325.3963< / ><>-0.7209< / ><>-1.1226< / ><>365.8250< / ><>-0.3500< / ><>-3.1250< / ><>431.7081< / ><>-0.7081< / >< / ><><>印度卢比< / ><>96.7862< / ><>0.0112< / ><>3.4915< / ><>108.4780< / ><>0.1481< / ><>0.0024< / ><>128.0144< / ><>0.0875< / >< / table>

富时精算师股票指数

周变化< / td>< rowspan="2">Oct 08< / >< colspan="3">美元< / >< colspan="3">欧元< / >< colspan="3">英镑< / >< / tr><><>收盘价< / ><>当日变化< / ><>周变化< / > < / ><><>-5.1886< / ><>印度尼西亚共和国< / ><>17895.0000< / ><>15.0000< / ><>-50.0000< / ><>20056.7160< / ><>41.8430< / ><>-158.3270< / ><>23668.8230< / ><>-33.5290< / ><>-37.4210< / >< / ><><>-0.007< / ><>以色列谢克尔< / ><>3.0636< / ><>-0.0087< / ><>-0.0214< / ><>3.4337< / ><>-0.0055< / ><>-0.0416< / ><>4.0521< / ><>-0.0092< / ><>-0.0234< / >< / ><><>-0.1792< / ><>肯尼亚钻石< / ><>158.2150< / ><>0.1100< / ><>0.4700< / ><>177.3273< / ><>0.3447< / ><>-0.3724< / ><>209.2831< / ><>0.2941< / ><>0.8741< / >< / ><><>-0.3663< / ><>科威特第纳尔< / ><>128.8500< / ><>0.0300< / ><>0.1800< / ><>147.5359< / ><>0.2154< / ><>-0.5134< / ><>17.1462< / ><>0.1371< / ><>0.4445< / >< / ><><>-0.2663< / ><>科威特第纳尔< / ><>0.3110< / ><>0.0006< / ><>0.0097< / ><>0.3486< / ><>0.0011< / ><>0.0006< / ><>0.4113< / ><>0.0010< / ><>0.0032< / >< / ><><>-3.4377< / ><>墨西哥比索< / ><>4.0915< / ><>0.0035< / ><>0.0060< / ><>4.5867< / ><>0.0097< / ><>-0.0165< / ><>5.4116< / ><>0.0077< / ><>0.0145< / >< / ><><>-3.4377< / ><>墨西哥比索< / ><>11.9921< / ><>-0.0164< / ><>-0.2887< / ><>20.1655< / ><>0.0046< / ><>-0.4216< / ><>2.7921< / ><>-0.0108< / ><>-0.3526< / >< / ><><>0.0055< / ><>新西兰元< / ><>1.7848< / ><>-0.0021< / ><>0.0010< / ><>2.0004< / ><>0.0002< / ><>-0.0082< / ><>2.3606< / ><>-0.0014< / ><>0.0052< / >< / ><><>111.1851< / ><>尼日利亚奈拉< / ><>1331.0800< / ><>2.1900< / ><>3.1500< / ><>1491.8746< / ><>4.3150< / ><>-4.0893< / ><>1790.5333< / ><>3.8933< / ><>5.2317< / >< / ><><>0.7368< / ><>挪威克朗< / ><>9.5628< / ><>-0.0071< / ><>-0.0595< / ><>10.7180< / ><>0.0054< / ><>-0.1215< / ><>12.6483< / ><>-0.0022< / ><>-0.0633< / >< / ><><>276.653< / ><>俄罗斯卢布< / ><>276.9530< / ><>-< / ><>-0.1000< / ><>318.7475< / ><>0.3877< / ><>-1.6115< / ><>368.7489< / ><>0.2076< / ><>0.3197< / >< / ><><>0.0550< / ><>秘鲁新索尔< / ><>3.4415< / ><>-0.0092< / ><>-0.0126< / ><>3.8572< / ><>0.0033< / ><>-0.0538< / ><>4.5519< / ><>-0.0096< / ><>-0.0111< / >< / ><><>0.1498< / ><>菲律宾比索< / ><>62.8950< / ><>0.1350< / ><>0.1075< / ><>70.4927< / ><>0.2392< / ><>-0.2374< / ><>83.1881< / ><>0.2256< / ><>0.2426< / >< / ><><>-0.1415< / ><>波兰兹罗提< / ><>3.9884< / ><>-0.0046< / ><>0.0225< / ><>4.3895< / ><>0.0033< / ><>0.0026< / ><>21.6894< / ><>-0.0032< / ><>0.0326< / >< / ><><>-0.9607< / ><>罗马尼亚列伊< / ><>4.7701< / ><>-0.0131< / ><>0.0280< / ><>5.3463< / ><>0.0080< / ><>-0.0244< / ><>6.3931< / ><>-0.0137< / ><>0.0424< / >< / ><><>0.8047< / ><>俄罗斯卢布< / ><>85.0500< / ><>-0.4500< / ><>1.7500< / ><>95.3240< / ><>-0.3847< / ><>1.4865< / ><>112.4915< / ><>-0.5310< / ><>2.4479< / >< / table>

富时行业指数：领涨与领跌 年初至今百分比变化

英国近期配股发行

科技硬件与设备< / td><>123.53< / >< / tr><><>替代能源< / ><>73.42< / >< / ><><>能源< / ><>36.78< / >< / ><><>石油、天然气与煤炭< / ><>36.75< / >< / ><><>工业金属与采矿< / ><>27.05< / >< / ><><>非寿险< / ><>27.01< / >< / ><><>医疗服务提供商< / ><>26.04< / >< / ><><>基础材料< / ><>23.24< / >< / ><><>电信服务提供商< / ><>17.39< / >< / ><><>电信< / ><>17.39< / >< / ><><>化学品< / ><>16.32< / >< / ><><>工业运输< / ><>16.25< / >< / ><><>电子与电气设备< / ><>14.98< / >< / ><><>建筑与材料< / ><>13.48< / >< / ><><>航空航天与国防< / ><>11.46< / >< / ><><>通用工业< / ><>11.32< / >< / ><><>封闭式投资< / ><>10.97< / >< / ><><>电力< / ><>9.38< / >< / ><><>银行< / ><>8.33< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">10月 08 日< / >< colspan="4">美元< / >< colspan="3">欧元< / >< colspan="2">英镑< / >< / ><><>收盘中价< / ><>当日涨跌< / ><>周涨跌< / > < / ><><>沙特里亚尔< / ><>3.7544< / ><>0.0002< / ><>-0.0001< / ><>4.2079< / ><>0.0054< / ><>-0.0761< / ><>4.9657< / ><>0.0000< / ><>0.0058< / >< / ><><>新加坡元< / ><>1.2164< / ><>0.0013< / ><>-< / ><>1.6291< / ><>0.0032< / ><>-0.0073< / ><>1.6943< / ><>0.0027< / ><>0.0053< / >< / ><><>南非兰特< / ><>16.6266< / ><>-0.0247< / ><>-0.0471< / ><>18.6351< / ><>-0.0043< / ><>-0.1479< / ><>21.9912< / ><>-0.0201< / ><>-0.0356< / >< / ><><>韩国韩元< / ><>1338.1500< / ><>-2.1000< / ><>-20.1000< / ><>1489.7886< / ><>-0.4773< / ><>-30.2700< / ><>1769.8427< / ><>-1.7724< / ><>-24.4120< / >< / ><><>瑞典克朗< / ><>9.9853< / ><>-0.0300< / ><>-0.6025< / ><>11.1915< / ><>-0.0200< / ><>-0.1205< / ><>13.2071< / ><>-0.0326< / ><>-0.0679< / >< / ><><>瑞士法郎< / ><>0.8328< / ><>0.0002< / ><>0.0021< / ><>0.9335< / ><>0.0014< / ><>-0.0224< / ><>1.1016< / ><>0.0010< / ><>0.0041< / >< / ><><>台湾元< / ><>31.3005< / ><>0.1175< / ><>0.0305< / ><>35.7877< / ><>0.1762< / ><>-0.1477< / ><>42.2328< / ><>0.1793< / ><>0.0914< / >< / ><><>泰国铢< / ><>33.6650< / ><>-0.0125< / ><>-0.0200< / ><>37.7542< / ><>0.0332< / ><>-0.2146< / ><>44.5534< / ><>0.0087< / ><>0.0274< / >< / ><><>突尼斯第纳尔< / ><>3.8044< / ><>-0.0035< / ><>0.0073< / ><>3.8744< / ><>-0.0002< / ><>-0.0625< / ><>3.9737< / ><>-0.0029< / ><>0.0146< / >< / ><><>土耳其里拉< / ><>49.2148< / ><>0.0175< / ><>0.1805< / ><>55.1599< / ><>0.0885< / ><>-0.0772< / ><>65.0839< / ><>0.0600< / ><>0.3172< / >< / ><><>阿联酋迪拉姆< / ><>3.6728< / ><>0.0001< / ><>4.1165< / ><>0.0052< / ><>-0.0299< / ><>4.8578< / ><>0.0028< / ><>0.0059< / >< / ><><>英镑< / ><>0.7561< / ><>-0.0004< / ><>-0.0009< / ><>0.8474< / ><>0.0065< / ><>-0.0053< / ><>1.0000< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>美元< / ><>1.8000< / ><>-< / ><>1.8000< / ><>0.0014< / ><>-0.0527< / ><>3.2221< / ><>0.0007< / ><>0.0016< / >< / ><><>越南盾< / ><>25899.5000< / ><>-81.0000< / ><>-82.5000< / ><>29028.1600< / ><>-54.4120< / ><>-240.5630< / ><>34255.9760< / ><>-87.6480< / ><>-67.5480< / >< / ><><>欧元< / ><>0.8922< / ><>-0.0011< / ><>0.0045< / ><>1.0000< / ><>-< / ><>1.1811< / ><>-< / ><>-0.0008< / ><>0.0074< / >< / table>

富时全球指数

公司名称 Petra Diamonds Ltd

3.53< / td><>工业< / >< / tr><><>3.42< / ><>媒体< / >< / ><><>6.78< / ><>饮料< / >< / ><><>6.75< / ><>金融< / >< / ><><>7.05< / ><>金融（不含投资公司）< / >< / ><><>7.01< / ><>零售商< / >< / ><><>6.04< / ><>公用事业< / >< / ><><>3.24< / ><>旅游与休闲< / >< / ><><>7.39< / ><>燃气、水及综合公用事业< / >< / ><><>7.39< / ><>食品生产商< / >< / ><><>6.32< / ><>工业工程< / >< / ><><>6.25< / ><>生物技术< / >< / ><><>4.98< / ><>消费者服务< / >< / ><><>3.48< / ><>消费者必需品< / >< / ><><>1.46< / ><>房地产投资信托基金< / >< / ><><>1.32< / ><>消费者可选消费品< / >< / ><><>0.57< / ><>房地产< / >< / ><><>0.38< / ><>个人护理、药品及杂货< / >< / ><><>0.33< / ><>烟草< / >< / table>

<><>10月07日区域与国家< / ><>股票数量< / ><>美国统计数据< / ><>当日%变化< / ><>每月%变化< / ><>年初至今%变化< / ><>美国总回报< / ><>年初至今总回报< / ><>股息收益率< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">富时全球行业指数< / >>< / ><><>全球< / ><>10217< / ><>1261.34< / ><>-0.65< / ><>-1.25< / ><>12.62< / ><>2182.14< / ><>14.21< / ><>1.60< / >< / ><><>全球大盘股< / ><>11742< / ><>1194.59< / ><>-0.50< / ><>-0.35< / ><>13.51< / ><>2126.46< / ><>15.04< / ><>1.47< / >< / ><><>全球美国< / ><>2469< / ><>1402.42< / ><>-0.95< / ><>-3.38< / ><>10.92< / ><>2301.16< / ><>17.10< / ><>2.04< / >< / ><><>全球小盘股< / ><>6015< / ><>14002.27< / ><>-1.26< / ><>-1.7< / ><>9.07< / ><>2177.36< / ><>10.69< / ><>1.85< / >< / ><><>全球（不含欧元区）< / ><>9612< / ><>1343.69< / ><>-0.54< / ><>-0.78< / ><>13.50< / ><>2265.23< / ><>14.99< / ><>1.51< / >< / ><><>全球（不含中国）< / ><>7601< / ><>4305.31< / ><>-0.65< / ><>-1.16< / ><>13.54< / ><>7069.58< / ><>15.12< / ><>1.58< / >< / ><><>全球（不含欧盟）< / ><>8972< / ><>898.22< / ><>-1.16< / ><>-4.27< / ><>10.86< / ><>1607.61< / ><>13.34< / ><>2.47< / >< / ><><>全球（不含英国）< / ><>9994< / ><>1339.86< / ><>-0.63< / ><>-1.11< / ><>12.93< / ><>2268.29< / ><>14.47< / ><>1.55< / >< / ><><>全球（不含日本）< / ><>8867< / ><>1316.30< / ><>-0.64< / ><>-1.22< / ><>12.16< / ><>2294.52< / ><>13.69< / ><>1.57< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">富时区域行业指数< / >>< / ><><>美洲< / ><>1987< / ><>1765.36< / ><>-0.42< / ><>0.32< / ><>13.44< / ><>2750.46< / ><>14.52< / ><>1.18< / >< / ><><>亚太< / ><>8429< / ><>932.23< / ><>-0.74< / ><>-2.24< / ><>19.71< / ><>1681.05< / ><>21.97< / ><>2.01< / >< / ><><>亚太（不含日本）< / ><>5079< / ><>1166.51< / ><>-0.73< / ><>-2.47< / ><>19.43< / ><>2327.53< / ><>21.58< / ><>2.02< / >< / ><><>欧洲< / ><>1435< / ><>667.60< / ><>-1.56< / ><>-6.72< / ><>1.68< / ><>1437.51< / ><>4.41< / ><>4.92< / >< / ><><>欧元区（不含英国）< / ><>1212< / ><>769.44< / ><>-1.85< / ><>-7.02< / ><>1.20< / ><>1600.41< / ><>3.22< / ><>2.84< / >< / ><><>欧元区< / ><>605< / ><>693.93< / ><>-2.06< / ><>-7.17< / ><>1.81< / ><>1479.94< / ><>4.44< / ><>2.82< / >< / ><><>亚洲< / ><>401< / ><>739.52< / ><>-0.97< / ><>-5.16< / ><>4.79< / ><>649.00< / ><>8.64< / ><>4.61< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">富时发达国家行业指数< / >>< / ><><>发达国家< / ><>5369< / ><>1309.19< / ><>0.65< / ><>-1.19< / ><>12.91< / ><>2238.15< / ><>14.42< / ><>1.51< / >< / ><><>发达国家（不含北美）< / ><>3607< / ><>755.72< / ><>-1.29< / ><>4.95< / ><>11.74< / ><>1527.80< / ><>14.41< / ><>2.54< / >< / ><><>10月07日行业< / ><>数量< / >< / table>

ofstocks< / td> 美国股票< / ><>当日%变动< / ><>当月%变动< / ><>年初至今%变动< / ><>美国总回报< / ><>年初至今总回报< / ><>股息收益率< / >< / tr>< / table>

事件 配股：每持有17股可认购10股，价格为每股16.5便士，须在11月21日前全额支付（参考 07.11.25）。

< colspan="8">数字信息服务< / >< / ><><>软件与计算机服务< / ><>527< / ><>3735.43< / ><>-0.43< / ><>4.88< / ><>4.04< / ><>4548.07< / ><>4.54 0.54< / >< / ><><>技术< / ><>153< / ><>775.28< / ><>1.11< / ><>-5.09< / ><>-14.84< / ><>1115.60< / ><>-14.19 1.09< / >< / ><><>半导体< / ><>300< / ><>980.87< / ><>-0.47< / ><>6.47< / ><>57.25< / ><>1074.40< / ><>57.94 0.52< / >< / ><><>技术硬件与设备< / ><>765< / ><>7491.00< / ><>6.10< / ><>54.46< / ><>10670.51< / ><>55.12 0.52< / >< / ><><>技术< / ><>252< / ><>5250.57< / ><>-0.40< / ><>5.95< / ><>30.95< / ><>6887.44< / ><>31.54 0.53< / >< / ><><>生物技术< / ><>216< / ><>122.62< / ><>-0.42< / ><>-2.25< / ><>15.58< / ><>125.25< / ><>15.95

0.29< / >< / ><><>电信设备< / ><>112< / ><>591.34< / ><>-0.77< / ><>3.23< / ><>76.88< / ><>684.39< / ><>78.33 0.75< / >< / ><><>电信 S / O< / ><>257< / ><>259.38< / ><>-0.46< / ><>-0.52< / ><>35.15< / ><>1794.85< / ><>37.68 1.69< / >< / ><><>电信服务提供商< / ><>145< / ><>437.77< / ><>0.00< / ><>-5.39< / ><>-0.16< / ><>979.85< / ><>2.91 3.60< / >< / ><><>电子与电气设备< / ><>361< / ><>2123.21< / ><>-2.22< / ><>-0.31< / ><>24.40< / ><>3065.48< / ><>25.55 0.93< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">金融< / >< / ><><>金融与信贷服务< / ><>111< / ><>827.64< / ><>-0.66< / ><>-11.38< / ><>-16.48< / ><>1298.66< / ><>-15.38

1.58< / >< / ><><>金融< / ><>1160< / ><>688.36< / ><>-1.48< / ><>-7.64< / ><>4.17< / ><>1440.02< / ><>6.85 2.89< / >< / ><><>人寿保险< / ><>71< / ><>636.50< / ><>-1.16< / ><>-6.61< / ><>7.04< / ><>1335.08< / ><>10.47 3.44< / >< / ><><>银行< / ><>497< / ><>509.20< / ><>-2.04< / ><>-7.68< / ><>9.15< / ><>1189.78< / ><>12.37 3.41< / >< / ><><>抵押贷款房地产投资信托< / ><>7< / ><>79.47< / ><>-0.30< / ><>-20.48< / ><>24.22< / ><>190.77< / ><>-16.41 16.18< / >< / ><><>非寿险< / ><>125< / ><>1023.86< / ><>-0.56< / ><>-6.99< / ><>-0.92< / ><>1852.66< / ><>2.20 2.78< / >< / ><><>投资银行与经纪服务< / ><>349< / ><>1187.27< / ><>-0.91< / ><>-7.48< / ><>-0.41< / ><>1912.55< / ><>1.06 1.74< / >< / ><><>交易处理

服务< / ><>55< / ><>143.32< / ><>0.29< / ><>-3.86< / ><>-3.92< / ><>150.41< / ><>-3.26 0.86< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">房地产< / >< / ><><>房地产< / ><>642< / ><>872.46< / ><>-0.98< / ><>-7.33< / ><>-4.40< / ><>1071.31< / ><>-1.50 4.03< / >< / ><><>房地产投资与服务< / ><>319< / ><>321.73< / ><>-0.50< / ><>-7.95< / ><>-15.19< / ><>663.27< / ><>-13.17 2.95< / >< / ><><>房地产投资总计< / ><>323< / ><>518.84< / ><>-1.13< / ><>-7.13< / ><>-0.37< / ><>1431.69< / ><>2.86 4.37< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">家居用品与服务< / >< / ><><>消费者数字服务< / ><>94< / ><>338.72< / ><>-0.30< / ><>5.31< / ><>4.32< / ><>343.61< / ><>4.60 0.32< / >< / ><><>消费者

discretionary< / td> 1485< / ><>1166.95< / ><>-0.08< / ><>-3.49< / ><>-6.84< / ><>1696.58< / ><>-5.91 1.26< / >< / tr> <>消费者服务< / ><>70< / ><>1325.34< / ><>0.02< / ><>-5.58< / ><>-8.74< / ><>1809.23< / ><>-8.09 0.91< / >< / ><><>消费者耐用品< / ><>612< / ><>956.98< / ><>0.02< / ><>-3.72< / ><>0.97< / ><>1769.94< / ><>3.59 1.16< / >< / ><><>零售商< / ><>263< / ><>1917.95< / ><>0.50< / ><>-1.60< / ><>1.22< / ><>2641.65< / ><>1.87 0.83< / >< / ><><>个人护理、药品及杂货店< / ><>196< / ><>547.28< / ><>0.10< / ><>-3.62< / ><>-1.69< / ><>918.64< / ><>0.39 2.61< / >< / ><><>个人用品< / ><>138< / ><>730.15< / ><>-0.47< / ><>-8.39< / ><>-20.82< / ><>1136.35< / ><>-19.43 2.25< / >< / ><><>旅游与休闲< / ><>153< / ><>633.93< / ><>-0.46< / ><>-3.37< / ><>-2.27< / ><>1099.44< / ><>-0.59 1.48< / >< / ><><>旅游与休闲< / ><>290< / ><>1087.99< / ><>-0.84< / ><>-7.50< / ><>-10.04< / ><>1607.63< / ><>-8.90 1.75< / >< / table>

2025年11月7日生效

<><>7.11< / ><>工业支持服务< / ><>-4.74< / >< / ><><>5.13< / ><>贵金属与采矿< / ><>-5.32< / >< / ><><>5.10< / ><>金融与信贷服务< / ><>-8.25< / >< / ><><>5.02< / ><>人寿保险< / ><>-8.42< / >< / ><><>3.80< / ><>房地产投资与服务< / ><>-7.48< / >< / ><><>3.37< / ><>消费者数字服务< / ><>-8.41< / >< / ><><>2.60< / ><>技术< / ><>-8.61< / >< / ><><>1.42< / ><>软件与计算机服务< / ><>-8.96< / >< / ><><>-0.44< / ><>个人用品< / ><>-8.25< / >< / ><><>-0.58< / ><>投资银行与经纪< / ><>-9.46< / >< / ><><>-1.62< / ><>制药与生物技术< / ><>-10.90< / >< / ><><>-1.83< / ><>< / >< / ><><>-2.00< / ><>医疗保健< / ><>-11.06< / >< / ><><>-2.11< / ><>休闲用品< / ><>-14.25< / >< / ><><>-2.81< / ><>医疗设备与服务< / ><>-16.81< / >< / ><><>-2.86< / ><>硬件与家居建筑< / ><>-26.20< / >< / table>

<><>10月07日 地区与国家< / ><>股票数量< / ><>美元 / 指数< / ><>当日涨跌%< / ><>月度涨跌%< / ><>年初至今涨跌%< / ><>美元 / 总回报< / ><>年初至今总回报%< / ><>综合股息率< / >< / ><><>发达国家（除加拿大）< / ><>5152< / ><>13163.63< / ><>-0.61< / ><>-0.99< / ><>13.14< / ><>2245.13< / ><>14.64< / ><>1.48< / >< / ><><>发达国家（除欧洲）< / ><>4156< / ><>1546.94< / ><>-0.50< / ><>-0.22< / ><>15.06< / ><>2454.98< / ><>16.31< / ><>1.27< / >< / ><><>发达国家（除欧元区）< / ><>4764< / ><>1409.53< / ><>-0.53< / ><>-0.68< / ><>13.94< / ><>2337.82< / ><>15.34< / ><>1.40< / >< / ><><>发达国家（除美国）< / ><>3824< / ><>784.04< / ><>-1.36< / ><>-5.17< / ><>11.13< / ><>1573.47< / ><>13.71< / ><>2.50< / >< / ><><>发达国家（除英国）< / ><>5146< / ><>1409.48< / ><>-0.63< / ><>-1.03< / ><>13.27< / ><>2335.93< / ><>15.73< / ><>1.45< / >< / ><><>发达国家（除日本）< / ><>4019< / ><>1377.35< / ><>-0.64< / ><>-1.16< / ><>12.41< / ><>2371.92< / ><>13.86< / ><>1.47< / >< / ><><>发达亚太地区< / ><>2301< / ><>863.61< / ><>-0.93< / ><>-2.82< / ><>26.89< / ><>1558.97< / ><>29.45< / ><>2.10< / >< / ><><>发达亚太地区（除日本）$1< / ><>1128< / ><>1126.65< / ><>-1.13< / ><>-4.14< / ><>36.04< / ><>2486.06< / ><>38.73< / ><>2.23< / >< / ><><>发达欧洲< / ><>1212< / ><>684.12< / ><>-1.55< / ><>-6.62< / ><>1.61< / ><>1472.99< / ><>4.34< / ><>1.92< / >< / ><><>发达国家（除欧元区除

英国< / td> 996< / ><>684.21< / ><>-1.84< / ><>-5.09< / ><>1.09< / ><>1661.46< / ><>3.62< / ><>2.08< / >< / tr> <>发达欧元区< / ><>605< / ><>689.35< / ><>-2.06< / ><>-7.19< / ><>1.60< / ><>1470.02< / ><>4.23< / ><>2.82< / >< / ><><>发达亚太地区 3514< / ><>3514< / ><>757.63< / ><>1.27< / ><>-4.91< / ><>11.74< / ><>1532.41< / ><>14.63< / ><>2.54< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">富时新兴市场指数< / >< / ><><>新兴市场< / ><>4848< / ><>1093.87< / ><>-0.64< / ><>-1.77< / ><>10.13< / ><>2129.46< / ><>12.37< / ><>2.40< / >< / ><><>新兴亚太地区< / ><>4128< / ><>1231.12< / ><>-0.48< / ><>-1.44< / ><>11.21< / ><>2254.02< / ><>13.11< / ><>1.89< / >< / ><><>新兴

欧洲< / ><>222< / ><>317.80< / ><>-2.38< / ><>-15.09< / ><>2.80< / ><>723.51< / ><>5.45< / ><>3.04< / >< / ><><>新兴市场（含韩国）< / ><>5289< / ><>4388.21< / ><>-0.86< / ><>-1.85< / ><>19.83< / ><>8047.34< / ><>21.98< / ><>2.10< / >< / ><><>新兴欧洲（不含波兰 / 中东欧）< / ><>3757< / ><>1356.56< / ><>-0.94< / ><>-1.21< / ><>23.85< / ><>8659.88< / ><>23.97< / ><>2.30< / >< / ><><>高级新兴市场< / ><>1198< / ><>1597.57< / ><>-0.53< / ><>-1.89< / ><>46.62< / ><>3482.64< / ><>49.78< / ><>2.41< / >< / ><><>次级新兴市场< / ><>3650< / ><>962.56< / ><>-0.75< / ><>-5.28< / ><>-12.53< / ><>1706.86< / ><>-11.24< / ><>2.39< / >< / table>

英国公司业绩

<><>10月07日行业< / ><>股票数量< / ><>美元指数< / ><>当日%变化< / ><>当月%变化< / ><>年初至今%变化< / ><>美元总回报< / ><>年初至今%总回报< / ><>总股息率< / >< / ><><>家用商品与家居建设< / ><>119< / ><>501.00< / ><>-2.07< / ><>-6.42< / ><>-6.69< / ><>863.61< / ><>-5.05< / ><>2.40< / >< / ><><>烟草< / ><>13< / ><>1370.15< / ><>1.20< / ><>2.24< / ><>11.05< / ><>4378.99< / ><>14.90< / ><>4.56< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">医疗保健< / >< / ><><>医疗保健< / ><>843< / ><>1168.19< / ><>0.78< / ><>-2.27< / ><>5.12< / ><>1847.04< / ><>6.65< / ><>1.61< / >< / ><><>医疗服务提供商< / ><>114< / ><>1777.56< / ><>-0.02< / ><>-2.50< / ><>9.10< / ><>2272.06< / ><>10.47< / ><>1.57< / >< / ><><>医药化学与

生物技术< / ><>531< / ><>1031.20< / ><>1.16< / ><>-2.64< / ><>10.17< / ><>1786.45< / ><>12.04< / ><>1.81< / >< / ><><>医疗设备与疫苗< / ><>198< / ><>1651.29< / ><>-0.01< / ><>-0.95< / ><>-9.06< / ><>2026.63< / ><>-8.30< / ><>1.01< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">农业食品与饮料< / >< / ><><>食品生产商< / ><>300< / ><>609.38< / ><>-0.10< / ><>-6.18< / ><>-3.23< / ><>1096.15< / ><>-0.48< / ><>3.32< / >< / ><><>饮料< / ><>103< / ><>924.77< / ><>-0.66< / ><>-4.69< / ><>4.15< / ><>1485.15< / ><>6.41< / ><>3.04< / >< / ><><

colspan="9">能源< / >< / ><><>能源< / ><>376< / ><>700.27< / ><>-0.65< / ><>-1.98< / ><>30.89< / ><>1521.71< / ><>34.11< / ><>3.00< / >< / ><><>电力< / ><>252< / ><>645.14< / ><>-0.33< / ><>-3.36< / ><>-0.50< / ><>1521.76< / ><>1.71< / ><>2.96< / >< / ><><>替代能源< / ><>90< / ><>98.47< / ><>-1.20< / ><>-3.67< / ><>4.38< / ><>120.51< / ><>6.65< / ><>3.58< / >< / ><><>个人能源< / ><>69< / ><>368.69< / ><>-2.67< / ><>-8.59< / ><>-1.44< / ><>285.32< / ><>-1.12< / ><>0.41< / >< / ><><>石油、天然气与煤炭< / ><>307< / ><>728.72< / ><>-0.55< / ><>-1.64< / ><>32.96< / ><>1649.12< / ><>36.43< / ><>3.13< / >< / ><><>天然气、水与

综合公用事业< / td> 119< / ><>679.53< / ><>-0.76< / ><>-4.43< / ><>-0.02< / ><>1719.03< / ><>2.81< / ><>3.70< / >< / tr> <>公用事业< / ><>412< / ><>670.70< / ><>-0.41< / ><>-3.73< / ><>-0.49< / ><>1606.63< / ><>1.82< / ><>3.05< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">交通运输< / >< / ><><>汽车及零部件< / ><>299< / ><>1048.14< / ><>-0.86< / ><>-1.82< / ><>-13.80< / ><>1728.01< / ><>-12.61< / ><>1.55< / >< / ><><>工业运输< / ><>384< / ><>1345.41< / ><>-1.34< / ><>-6.13< / ><>7.38< / ><>2354.72< / ><>9.52< / ><>2.40< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">工业< / >< / ><><>航空航天与国防< / ><>106< / ><>2683.36< / ><>-2.32< / ><>-8.81< / ><>-5.38< / ><>4103.16< / ><>-4.67< / ><>1.22< / >< / ><><>工业工程< / ><>347< / ><>2341.49< / ><>-2.77< / ><>-2.34< / ><>19.98< / ><>3720.19< / ><>21.29< / ><>1.26< / >< / ><><>工业材料< / ><>92< / ><>272.37< / ><>-1.11< / ><>-5.52< / ><>-2.09< / ><>541.16< / ><>-0.19< / ><>2.96< / >< / ><><>工业金属与采矿< / ><>388< / ><>1063.32< / ><>-1.94< / ><>-7.64< / ><>17.01< / ><>2127.29< / ><>19.29< / ><>2.37< / >< / ><><>工业支持服务< / ><>232< / ><>2563.68< / ><>0.06< / ><>-3.97< / ><>-2.45< / ><>1842.07< / ><>-1.32< / ><>1.35< / >< / ><><>工业< / ><>2103< / ><>1518.82< / ><>-1.69< / ><>-4.29< / ><>5.96< / ><>2431.30< / ><>7.28< / ><>1.49< / >< / ><><>通用工业< / ><>202< / ><>940.31< / ><>-1.84< / ><>-2.10< / ><>14.97< / ><>1690.91< / ><>16.63< / ><>1.62< / >< / ><>< colspan="9">资源与材料< / >< / ><><>基础材料< / ><>1035< / ><>1021.37< / ><>-1.60< / ><>-7.41< / ><>11.41< / ><>1904.73< / ><>13.49< / ><>2.19< / >< / ><><>化学品< / ><>457< / ><>1076.54< / ><>-0.60< / ><>-1.72< / ><>16.40< / ><>1938.27< / ><>18.63< / ><>2.10< / >< / ><><>建筑与材料< / ><>471< / ><>1355.23< / ><>-2.18< / ><>-5.80< / ><>-4.14< / ><>2255.32< / ><>-2.75< / ><>1.38< / >< / ><><>废物与处置服务< / ><>41< / ><>403.23< / ><>0.27< / ><>-4.10< / ><>-2.03< / ><>445.76< / ><>-0.95< / ><>1.32< / >< / ><><>贵金属与采矿< / ><>98< / ><>1396.53< / ><>-2.55< / ><>-14.73< / ><>-1.72< / ><>2487.29< / ><>-0.16< / ><>1.86< / >< / table>

<><>公司< / ><>营业额(£)< / >< / ><><>Ashoka India Equity Inv Trust< / ><>Fin - (-)< / >< / ><><>Ensilica< / ><>Fin 27.8m (18.2m)< / >< / ><><>Fidelity Emerging Markets $< / ><> - (-)< / >< / ><><>Maven Renovar VCT< / ><>Int - (-)< / >< / ><><>Netcall< / ><> 57.7m (48.0m)< / >< / ><><>Next 15 Group< / ><>Int 299.4m (316.1m)< / >< / ><><>PXN Growth< / ><>Int - (-)< / >< / ><><>Schroder Japan Trust*< / ><> - (-)< / >< / ><><>Tesco< / ><>Int 374亿 (360亿)< / >< / ><><>Volution Grp< / ><> 484.8m (419.1m)< / >< / table>

富时 100 指数摘要

< / td><>收盘价 (p)< / ><>%涨跌< / >< / tr><><>3i Group< / ><>2352.00< / ><>-1.63< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Group< / ><>237.00< / ><>1.11< / >< / ><><>Admiral< / ><>3634.00< / ><>-0.28< / >< / ><><>Airtel Africa< / ><>309.60< / ><>-1.02< / >< / ><><>Alliance Witan< / ><>1397.00< / ><>-0.36< / >< / ><><>Anglo American< / ><>4040.00< / ><>-0.47< / >< / ><><>Antofagasta< / ><>3605.00< / ><>-2.36< / >< / ><><>Assoc. Brit. Foods< / ><>1834.00< / ><>0.38< / >< / ><><>阿斯利康 (AstraZeneca)< / ><>11892.00< / ><>-2.36< / >< / ><><>Autototrader Group< / ><>485.90< / ><>3.21< / >< / ><><>Aviva< / ><>672.80< / ><>-0.68< / >< / ><><>Babcock Intl< / ><>904.60< / ><>1.53< / >< / ><><>BAE Systems< / ><>1836.50< / ><>0.57< / >< / ><><>Balfour Beatty< / ><>866.00< / ><>-0.97< / >< / ><><>巴克莱银行 (Barclays)< / ><>426.15< / ><>-1.37< / >< / ><><>Barnett Redrow< / ><>291.40< / ><>-2.90< / >< / ><><>BP< / ><>584.80< / ><>4.06< / >< / ><><>英美烟草 (Brit. Amer. Tobacco)< / ><>4161.00< / ><>1.89< / >< / ><><>British Land< / ><>384.80< / ><>-1.64< / >< / ><><>BT Group< / ><>197.45< / ><>-0.50< / >< / ><><>Bunzl< / ><>2710.00< / ><>2.26< / >< / ><><>Burberry< / ><>1007.00< / ><>-0.89< / >< / ><><>Centrica< / ><>147.00< / ><>0.82< / >< / ><><>Coca-Cola Europec< / ><>7785.00< / ><>1.10< / >< / ><><>Coca-Cola HBC AG< / ><>4254.00< / ><>0.14< / >< / ><><>Compass< / ><>2324.88< / ><>0.76< / >< / ><><>Computacenter< / ><>5485.00< / ><>0.64< / >< / ><><>Convatec< / ><>213.00< / ><>-1.70< / >< / ><><>Croda International< / ><>3344.00< / ><>0.18< / >< / ><><>DCC Energy< / ><>6445.00< / ><>0.08< / >< / ><><>Diageo< / ><>1622.00< / ><>0.68< / >< / ><><>Diploma< / ><>7750.00< / ><>0.65< / >< / ><><>easyJet< / ><>681.00< / ><>0.21< / >< / ><><>Endeavour Mining< / ><>4073.00< / ><>-0.76< / >< / ><><>Experian< / ><>2574.00< / ><>1.22< / >< / ><><>F&C Inv Trust< / ><>348.40< / ><>0.06< / >< / ><><>Fresnillo< / ><>2688.00< / ><>0.04< / >< / ><><>Games Works< / ><>16350.00< / ><>-1.15< / >< / ><><>嘉能可 (Glencore)< / ><>568.70< / ><>-0.04< / >< / ><><>GSK< / ><>1735.50< / ><>-3.07< / >< / ><><>Haleon< / ><>344.30< / ><>0.55< / >< / ><><>Halma< / ><>3500.00< / ><>-0.05< / >< / ><><>Hiscox< / ><>1822.00< / ><>-0.65< / >< / ><><>Howden Joinery< / ><>748.00< / ><>-0.86< / >< / ><><>汇丰银行 (HSBC)< / ><>1380.60< / ><>-1.95< / >< / ><><>ICG< / ><>1735.00< / ><>-1.64< / >< / ><><>IG Group< / ><>963.00< / ><>1.37< / >< / ><><>IMI< / ><>3032.00< / ><>-0.66< / >< / ><><>Imperial Brands< / ><>2614.00< / ><>5.06< / >< / ><><>Informa< / ><>891.00< / ><>2.82< / >< / table>

<><>< / ><>收盘价 (p)< / ><>%涨跌< / >< / ><><>洲际酒店 (InterCont'l Hotels)< / ><>11807.90< / ><>-1.71< / >< / ><><>国际航空 (Intl Cons Airlines)< / ><>420.00< / ><>-2.96< / >< / ><><>Intersk Group< / ><>5890.00< / ><>-0.17< / >< / ><><>Investec< / ><>588.50< / ><>-1.09< / >< / ><><>Ithaca Energy< / ><>279.60< / ><>1.82< / >< / ><><>JD Sports Fashion< / ><>84.02< / ><>0.62< / >< / ><><>Kingfisher< / ><>322.40< / ><>-2.04< / >< / ><><>Land Securities< / ><>601.00< / ><>-1.88< / >< / ><><>Legal & General< / ><>285.50< / ><>-0.90< / >< / ><><>Lion Finance< / ><>12370.00< / ><>-3.59< / >< / ><><>劳埃德银行集团 (Lloyds Big Gp)< / ><>100.60< / ><>-1.66< / >< / ><><>LondonMetric Prop< / ><>172.00< / ><>-0.23< / >< / ><><>Lon Stock < / >< / table>

Ex< / td> 8470.00< / ><>1.85< / >< / tr> <>M&G< / ><>304.40< / ><>-1.17< / >< / ><><>Marks & Spen< / ><>396.10< / ><>0.10< / >< / ><><>Melrose Intl< / ><>438.30< / ><>-2.60< / >< / ><><>Metlen Energy< / ><>4048.81< / ><>-2.54< / >< / ><><>Natl Grid< / ><>1152.50< / ><>0.22< / >< / ><><>NatWest Group< / ><>639.80< / ><>-1.54< / >< / ><><>Next< / ><>14455.00< / ><>-0.82< / >< / ><><>Pearson< / ><>1266.50< / ><>1.89< / >< / ><><>Pershing Square Hldgs< / ><>3734.00< / ><>-0.43< / >< / ><><>Polar CapTech< / ><>705.50< / ><>-0.91< / >< / ><><>Prudential< / ><>887.60< / ><>0.75< / >< / ><><>Reckitt Benckiser< / ><>5072.00< / ><>-0.67< / >< / ><><>RELX< / ><>2595.00< / ><>-0.15< / >< / ><><>Rentokil Initial< / ><>301.40< / ><>1.17< / >< / ><><>Rio

Tinto< / ><>7022.00< / ><>-1.00< / >< / ><><>Rolls-Royce< / ><>1367.00< / ><>-2.66< / >< / ><><>Sainsbury UJ< / ><>332.40< / ><>1.47< / >< / ><><>Scot Mort Inv Tst< / ><>1623.00< / ><>-0.18< / >< / ><><>Segro< / ><>908.00< / ><>-0.61< / >< / ><><>Severn Trent< / ><>3096.00< / ><>1.24< / >< / ><><>Shell< / ><>3780.50< / ><>3.63< / >< / ><><>Smith & Nephew< / ><>1003.50< / ><>-1.52< / >< / ><><>Smiths Gp< / ><>2710.00< / ><>-1.88< / >< / ><><>Sprax Group< / ><>7015.00< / ><>-1.75< / >< / ><><>SSE< / ><>2437.00< / ><>-0.89< / >< / ><><>Standard Chartered< / ><>2108.00< / ><>-2.00< / >< / ><><>Standard Life< / ><>838.50< / ><>-3.79< / >< / ><><>St James's Place< / ><>1020.00< / ><>-0.68< / >< / ><><>Tesco< / ><>500.40< / ><>5.41< / >< / ><><>The Sage

Grp< / ><>1027.50< / ><>0.54< / >< / ><><>Tritax Big Box< / ><>138.90< / ><>-1.91< / >< / ><><>Unilever< / ><>4626.00< / ><>0.06< / >< / ><><>Utd. Utilities< / ><>1416.00< / ><>1.29< / >< / ><><>Vodafone< / ><>124.40< / ><>-2.62< / >< / ><><>Weir< / ><>2538.00< / ><>-0.86< / >< / ><><>Whitbread< / ><>2445.00< / ><>-1.09< / >< / ><><>WPP< / ><>372.30< / ><>-3.30< / >< / table>

英国近期新增股票

<><>< / ><>收盘价 (p)< / ><>%涨跌< / ><>< / ><>收盘价 (p)< / ><>%涨跌< / >< / ><><>1947 Oil & Gas< / ><>9.60< / ><>1.05< / ><>iForex Financial< / ><>145.00< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Avimia< / ><>141.00< / ><>-< / ><>Mendell Helium< / ><>3.90< / ><>-1.27< / >< / ><><>ATC Music Grp< / ><>187.50< / ><>-< / ><>Meridian Mining< / ><>122.00< / ><>-1.61< / >< / ><><>Braware Solutions< / ><>164.50< / ><>-< / ><>Pathos Comms< / ><>25.50< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Chaleit Holdings< / ><>69.00< / ><>20.00< / ><>Rift Helium< / ><>6.40< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Coastal Africa Group< / ><>200.00< / ><>-< / ><>Serval Resources< / ><>30.50< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Comish Metals< / ><>104.00< / ><>-0.95< / ><>Sintana Energy< / ><>21.00< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Dauch

Corp< / ><>428.00< / ><>0.47< / ><>Sunbelt Rentals< / ><>5624.00< / ><>-0.50< / >< / ><><>EDX Medical Group< / ><>7.50< / ><>-14.29< / ><>Tapir Holdings< / ><>44.00< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Halo Minerals< / ><>8.25< / ><>-< / ><>The Smarter Web Co< / ><>60.69< / ><>-10.09< / >< / table>

英国 (美元) FT GLOBAL 500：全球最大公司

股票< / td>< colspan="7">52周< / >< / tr><><>价格< / ><>+ / 涨跌< / ><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / ><>市值 (十亿)< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">澳大利亚 (AUD)< / >< / ><><>澳新银行集团 (ANZ Group Holdings)< / ><>37.95< / ><>0.09< / ><>41.00< / ><>33.36< / ><>5.73< / ><>19.49< / ><>114.45< / >< / ><><>必和必拓 (BHP Group)< / ><>62.45< / ><>-0.41< / ><>68.77< / ><>40.17< / ><>3.87< / ><>32.26< / ><>317.51< / >< / ><><>联邦银行 (Commonwealth Bank)< / ><>150.37< / ><>-2.01< / ><>185.59< / ><>146.98< / ><>3.36< / ><>23.04< / ><>251.64< / >< / ><><>CSL Ltd< / ><>181.99< / ><>3.31< / ><>222.47< / ><>90.00< / ><>2.23< / ><>28.30< / ><>87.33< / >< / ><><>麦格理集团 (Macquarie Group)< / ><>248.77< / ><>-1.25< / ><>267.90< / ><>187.31< / ><>3.24< / ><>25.41< / ><>95.44< / >< / ><><>澳大利亚国民银行 (National Australia Bank)< / ><>38.40< / ><>-0.30< / ><>49.45< / ><>35.48< / ><>4.43< / ><>17.38< / ><>119.71< / >< / ><><>Westfarmers< / ><>76.30< / ><>0.44< / ><>94.70< / ><>70.80< / ><>2.91< / ><>30.11< / ><>86.62< / >< / ><><>西太平洋银行 (Westpac Banking)< / ><>34.24< / ><>-0.42< / ><>43.32< / ><>33.46< / ><>4.50< / ><>17.04< / ><>117.11< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">比利时 (EUR)< / >< / table>

<><>Aténeuser-busch indev< / ><>67,34< / ><>-0,22< / ><>76,18< / ><>50,10< / ><>1,20< / ><>25,41< / ><>121,02< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">巴西 (BRL)< / >< / ><><>伊塔乌联合银行控股 (Itau Unibanco Holding)< / ><>53,15< / ><>-1,71< / ><>55,43< / ><>32,50< / ><>0,00< / ><>298,58< / >< / ><><>伊塔乌联合银行控股优先股 (Itau Unibanco Holding Prfd)< / ><>49,11< / ><>-1,34< / ><>50,85< / ><>36,96< / ><>0,00< / ><>265,64< / >< / ><><>巴西石油公司 (Petroleo Brasileiro)< / ><>60,05< / ><>0,74< / ><>62,00< / ><>30,96< / ><>0,00< / ><>53,22< / ><>446,91< / >< / ><><>巴西石油公司优先股 (Petroleo Brasileiro Prfd)< / ><>54,33< / ><>0,51< / ><>56,75< / ><>29,31< / ><>0,00< / ><>295,91< / >< / ><><>淡水河谷 (Vale)< / ><>68,75< / ><>-1,62< / ><>91,62< / ><>58,75< / ><>0,00< / ><>77,46< / ><>292,58< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">加拿大 ($AP)< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">股票< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< colspan="5">52周< / >< / ><><>+ / -涨跌< / ><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">芬兰 (EUR)< / >< / ><><>Nordex Bank Abp< / ><>16.82< / ><>-0.24< / ><>18.11< / ><>13.76< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.10< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">法国 (EUR)< / >< / ><><>液化空气 (Air Liquide)< / ><>168.62< / ><>-0.48< / ><>189.80< / ><>154.86< / ><>1.99< / ><>32.31< / >< / ><><>Aarhus< / ><>187.44< / ><>-0.56< / ><>221.30< / ><>157.42< / ><>1.71< / ><>34.97< / >< / ><><>AAA< / ><>42.03< / ><>-0.74< / ><>45.66< / ><>36.55< / ><>5.52< / ><>11.71< / >< / ><><>法国巴黎银行 A (BNP Paribas A)< / ><>91.40< / ><>-3.69< / ><>113.82< / ><>65.12< / ><>8.35< / ><>9.55< / >< / ><><>圣戈班公司 (Compagnie de Saint-Gobain)< / ><>64.76< / ><>-2.38< / ><>91.56< / ><>65.66< / ><>3.55< / ><>9.67< / >< / ><><>农业信贷银行 (Credit Agricole)< / ><>16.52< / ><>-0.59< / ><>20.40< / ><>15.37< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.58< / >< / ><><>Doverne< / ><>58.78< / ><>-0.04< / ><>60.14< / ><>57.26< / ><>3.83< / ><>22.70< / >< / ><><>达索系统 (Dassault Synthons)< / ><>21.61< / ><>0.10< / ><>30.36< / ><>15.82< / ><>1.25< / ><>24.01< / >< / ><><>ENSE< / ><>22.74< / ><>-0.71< / ><>29.89< / ><>18.18< / ><>4.53< / ><>14.96< / >< / ><><>EnelIndustrials< / ><>146.65< / ><>-0.05< / ><>323.90< / ><>138.30< / ><>2.73< / ><>28.20< / >< / ><><>爱马仕 (Hermes)< / >

International< / td> 1280.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>2300.00< / ><>1260.00< / ><>1.41< / ><>29.14< / >< / tr> <>Llreal< / ><>374.40< / ><>0.80< / ><>405.80< / ><>338.85< / ><>1.92< / ><>29.46< / >< / ><><>LMVMI Met Hennessy< / ><>388.45< / ><>2.85< / ><>654.70< / ><>376.00< / ><>3.35< / ><>17.77< / >< / ><><>Safran< / ><>319.40< / ><>-10.00< / ><>366.50< / ><>262.60< / ><>1.05< / ><>42.03< / >< / ><><>Sorfixi< / ><>71.81< / ><>1.20< / ><>91.15< / ><>69.75< / ><>5.74< / ><>9.17< / >< / ><><>施耐德电气 (Schneider Electric)< / ><>254.55< / ><>-5.95< / ><>312.30< / ><>220.40< / ><>1.65< / ><>29.63< / >< / ><><>道达尔能源 (TotalEnergies)< / ><>75.42< / ><>-0.30< / ><>81.34< / ><>49.24< / ><>4.64< / ><>10.95< / >< / ><><>VNCI< / ><>108.00< / ><>-1.25< / ><>143.15< / ><>104.25< / ><>4.68< / ><>12.49< / >< / table>

<><>Argopec Eagle Mines< / ><>257.21< / ><>-7.39< / ><>348.94< / ><>188.48< / ><>1.00< / ><>21.95< / ><>131.04< / >< / ><><>Amerization-Cuze Ford-Tam< / ><>77.11< / ><>-0.05< / ><>95.15< / ><>68.30< / ><>1.12< / ><>26.50< / ><>70.78< / >< / ><><>蒙特利尔银行 (Bank of Montreal)< / ><>230.72< / ><>-5.48< / ><>259.20< / ><>168.92< / ><>2.96< / ><>26.25< / ><>160.31< / >< / ><><>新斯科舍银行 (Bank of Nova Scotia)< / ><>124.29< / ><>-3.95< / ><>134.50< / ><>88.22< / ><>3.67< / ><>25.57< / ><>153.05< / >< / ><><>布鲁克菲尔德 (Brookfield)< / ><>52.71< / ><>-0.27< / ><>95.94< / ><>50.85< / ><>0.76< / ><>94.12< / ><>117.66< / >< / ><><>布鲁克菲尔德资产管理 (Brookfield Asset Mgmt)< / ><>63.51< / ><>-0.78< / ><>82.98< / ><>58.09< / ><>4.51< / ><>36.29< / ><>101.44< / >< / ><><>加拿大帝国银行 (Canadian Imperial Bank)< / ><>154.57< / ><>-4.08< / ><>172.87< / ><>111.45< / ><>2.77< / ><>20.64< / ><>140.34< / >< / ><><>加拿大国家铁路 (Canadian National Railway)< / ><>164.99< / ><>-3.35< / ><>185.25< / ><>126.05< / ><>2.22< / ><>29.05< / ><>99.67< / >< / ><><>加拿大自然资源公司 (Canadian Natural)< / ><>67.80< / ><>-0.68< / ><>72.35< / ><>41.67< / ><>3.69< / ><>16.54< / ><>139.77< / >< / ><><>加拿大太平洋航空 (Canadian Pacific Airways)< / ><>119.18< / ><>-2.26< / ><>133.38< / ><>96.50< / ><>0.83< / ><>37.83< / ><>104.77< / >< / ><><>Constellation Software< / ><>2801.98< / ><>-48.66< / ><>4081.71< / ><>2198.00< / ><>0.20< / ><>971.10< / ><>611.50< / >< / ><><>恩桥 (Enbridge)< / ><>65.43< / ><>-0.77< / ><>80.65< / ><>62.42< / ><>5.93< / ><>34.26< / ><>148.38< / >< / ><><>皇家荷兰壳牌金融 (Royal Dutch Shell Financial)< / ><>163.89< / ><>-6.23< / ><>183.85< / ><>109.00< / ><>2.46< / ><>16.89< / ><>109.00< / >< / ><><>加拿大皇家银行 (Royal Bank of Canada)< / ><>272.82< / ><>-6.37< / ><>306.38< / ><>200.82< / ><>2.58< / ><>24.78< / ><>379.16< / >< / ><><>Shopify Inc.< / ><>236.59< / ><>2.86< / ><>253.10< / ><>129.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>158.78< / ><>285.94< / >< / ><><>森科能源公司 (Suncor Energy)< / ><>97.26< / ><>0.21< / ><>100.24< / ><>53.02< / ><>2.47< / ><>25.39< / ><>113.76< / >< / ><><>TC Energy< / ><>84.00< / ><>-1.57< / ><>100.18< / ><>69.41< / ><>4.18< / ><>33.60< / ><>84.00< / >< / ><><>多伦多道明银行 (The Toronto-Dominion Bank)< / ><>162.43< / ><>-5.63< / ><>175.33< / ><>109.50< / ><>2.71< / ><>19.66< / ><>274.42< / >< / ><><>Waste Connections< / ><>221.28< / ><>1.59< / ><>251.45< / ><>203.46< / ><>0.90< / ><>53.32< / ><>55.77< / >< / table>

德国 (EUR)< / td>< / tr><><>adidas AG< / ><>146.75< / ><>1.60< / ><>196.40< / ><>129.95< / ><>1.91< / ><>19.67< / >< / ><><>安联 (Allianz)< / ><>417.30< / ><>-3.40< / ><>454.60< / ><>338.80< / ><>4.10< / ><>14.59< / >< / ><><>巴斯夫 (BASF)< / ><>51.18< / ><>0.10< / ><>55.05< / ><>41.48< / ><>4.40< / ><>28.12< / >< / ><><>宝马 (BMW)< / ><>53.66< / ><>-0.98< / ><>97.92< / ><>52.36< / ><>8.20< / ><>4.51< / >< / ><><>德意志银行 (Deutsche Bank)< / ><>29.86< / ><>-1.55< / ><>35.84< / ><>23.82< / ><>3.35< / ><>9.45< / >< / ><><>德意志交易所 (Deutsche Bors)< / ><>292.20< / ><>-3.10< / ><>298.90< / ><>200.10< / ><>1.44< / ><>44.34< / >< / ><><>德国电信 (Deutsche Telekom AG)< / ><>28.99< / ><>0.58< / ><>34.36< / ><>23.53< / ><>3.71< / ><>13.70< / >< / ><><>DHL集团 (DHL Group)< / ><>56.95< / ><>-0.55< / ><>58.90< / ><>39.37< / ><>3.47< / ><>17.98< / >< / ><><>Deutschland Technologique< / ><>60.95< / ><>-3.73< / ><>88.83< / ><>31.27< / ><>0.57< / ><>79.16< / >< / ><><>梅赛德斯-奔驰集团 (Mercedes-Benz Group)< / ><>39.83< / ><>-0.67< / ><>62.34< / ><>39.41< / ><>8.79< / ><>3.91< / >< / ><><>默克 (Merck)< / ><>140.15< / ><>1.15< / ><>148.80< / ><>100.70< / ><>1.57< / ><>21.93< / >< / ><><>Muenchenke Ranch< / ><>516.60< / ><>4.60< / ><>575.60< / ><>437.40< / ><>4.65< / ><>24.67< / >< / ><><>保时捷 (Porsche)< / ><>42.67< / ><>0.14< / ><>50.66< / ><>35.62< / ><>2.37< / ><>10.80< / >< / ><><>莱茵金属 (Rheinmetall)< / ><>929.20< / ><>-26.80< / ><>1966.00< / ><>900.20< / ><>1.24< / ><>56.10< / >< / ><><>SAP< / ><>187.62< / ><>-0.98< / ><>244.30< / ><>127.50< / ><>1.33< / ><>30.56< / >< / ><><>西门子 (Siemens)< / ><>271.20< / ><>-7.80< / ><>291.70< / ><>198.00< / ><>1.97< / ><>25.75< / >< / ><><>西门子能源 (Siemens Energy)< / ><>143.60< / ><>-3.84< / ><>191.66< / ><>94.40< / ><>0.49< / ><>227.94< / >< / ><><>西门子医疗 (Siemens Healthineers)< / ><>38.56< / ><>0.49< / ><>49.71< / ><>32.81< / ><>2.59< / ><>20.19< / >< / ><><>大众 (Volkswagen)< / ><>70.05< / ><>1.10< / ><>110.20< / ><>67.50< / ><>7.42< / ><>5.27< / >< / ><><>大众私有 (Volkswagen Privat)< / ><>69.74< / ><>0.86< / ><>109.15< / ><>67.02< / ><>7.54< / ><>5.25< / >< / table>

<><>科威特金融机构 (Kuwait Finance House)< / ><>0.77< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.85< / ><>0.77< / ><>3.12< / ><>23.09< / ><>15.20< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">墨西哥 (MXN)< / >< / ><><>America Movil B< / ><>20.15< / ><>0.03< / ><>24.49< / ><>17.48< / ><>2.68< / ><>0.00< / ><>1253.03< / >< / ><><>墨西哥沃尔玛 (Wal-Mart de Mexico)< / ><>46.76< / ><>0.12< / ><>63.97< / ><>44.80< / ><>2.48< / ><>0.00< / ><>815.79< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">荷兰 (EUR)< / >< / ><><>Adyen< / ><>867.20< / ><>0.20< / ><>1600.80< / ><>772.40< / ><>0.00< / ><>47.62< / ><>27.49< / >< / ><><>ASML Holding< / ><>1610.20< / ><>-26.20< / ><>1741.00< / ><>812.60< / ><>0.48< / ><>80.87< / ><>625.00< / >< / ><><>喜力 (Heineken)< / ><>70.46< / ><>0.22< / ><>80.44< / ><>63.90< / ><>2.72< / ><>15.12< / ><>39.84< / >< / ><><>ING集团 (ING Groep)< / ><>30.24< / ><>-0.89< / ><>32.40< / ><>20.23< / ><>3.76< / ><>15.27< / ><>86.89< / >< / ><><>Prosus N< / ><>35.30< / ><>-0.27< / ><>63.94< / ><>34.48< / ><>0.79< / ><>6.67< / ><>77.18< / >< / ><><>Magnum冰淇淋公司 (The Magnum Ice Cream Co)< / ><>15.21< / ><>-0.22< / ><>17.68< / ><>11.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>31.68< / ><>9.31< / >< / ><><>环球音乐集团 (Universal Music Group NV)< / ><>14.36< / ><>0.07< / ><>24.53< / ><>13.92< / ><>3.62< / ><>33.38< / ><>26.39< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">挪威 (NOK)< / >< / table>

中国农业银行 A< / td><>6.97< / ><>8.68< / ><>5.79< / ><>3.72< / ><>8.94< / ><>22.25< / >< / tr><><>中国银行 A< / ><>6.73< / ><>6.79< / ><>5.13< / ><>3.51< / ><>9.09< / ><>16.06< / >< / ><><>交通银行 A< / ><>7.75< / ><>7.77< / ><>6.37< / ><>4.34< / ><>7.18< / ><>448.77< / >< / ><><>中国建设银行 A< / ><>11.06< / ><>11.23< / ><>8.50< / ><>3.65< / ><>8.51< / ><>234.28< / >< / ><><>中国人寿 A< / ><>36.70< / ><>51.92< / ><>32.32< / ><>2.66< / ><>6.73< / ><>764.22< / >< / ><><>招商银行 A< / ><>41.26< / ><>43.79< / ><>35.28< / ><>4.89< / ><>7.24< / ><>851.15< / >< / ><><>中国石油化工 A< / ><>5.28< / ><>8.11< / ><>4.43< / ><>4.11< / ><>20.15< / ><>512.36< / >< / ><><>中国神华能源 A< / ><>47.80< / ><>51.18< / ><>38.27< / ><>4.21< / ><>17.97< / ><>875.31< / >< / ><><>长江电力 A< / ><>28.54< / ><>29.57< / ><>25.38< / ><>3.50< / ><>20.24< / ><>698.32< / >< / ><><>中信证券 A< / ><>25.86< / ><>30.63< / ><>23.77< / ><>3.24< / ><>13.19< / ><>315.50< / >< / ><><>Cont Amheres Tech A< / ><>291.11< / ><>468.75< / ><>285.74< / ><>1.23< / ><>18.04< / ><>1283.49< / >< / ><><>东方财富 A< / ><>17.79< / ><>27.08< / ><>17.22< / ><>0.56< / ><>23.25< / ><>281.48< / >< / ><><>印度互联网 A< / ><>58.20< / ><>84.95< / ><>47.35< / ><>1.68< / ><>32.70< / ><>1154.93< / >< / ><><>工业银行 A< / ><>8.28< / ><>8.40< / ><>6.85< / ><>3.86< / ><>8.28< / ><>2.23< / >< / ><><>兴业银行 A< / ><>18.05< / ><>21.90< / ><>16.44< / ><>5.91< / ><>5.22< / ><>381.99< / >< / ><><>江苏恒瑞医药 A< / ><>47.20< / ><>71.00< / ><>57.00< / ><>4.77< / ><>37.50< / ><>301.31< / >< / ><><>Kweichan Mechat A< / ><>1258.62< / ><>1568.00< / ><>1151.01< / ><>4.13< / ><>19.17< / ><>15733.38< / >< / ><><>立讯精密 A< / ><>49.43< / ><>81.78< / ><>44.57< / ><>0.50< / ><>21.59< / ><>362.91< / >< / ><><>Middle Group A< / ><>80.10< / ><>89.50< / ><>71.02< / ><>5.37< / ><>13.81< / ><>557.70< / >< / ><><>中国石油 A< / ><>11.21< / ><>13.69< / ><>8.04< / ><>4.55< / ><>13.03< / ><>1.82< / >< / ><><>中国平安 A< / ><>53.29< / ><>74.88< / ><>46.90< / ><>5.12< / ><>9.94< / ><>568.07< / >< / ><><>中国邮政储蓄银行 A< / ><>5.46< / ><>6.13< / ><>4.76< / ><>4.18< / ><>7.48< / ><>5.47< / >< / ><><>深圳迈瑞医疗 A< / ><>163.32< / ><>248.98< / ><>130.66< / ><>2.63< / ><>24.02< / ><>195.49< / >< / ><><>五粮液 A< / ><>70.06< / ><>122.96< / ><>68.68< / ><>7.36< / ><>30.37< / ><>271.95< / >< / ><><>紫金矿业 A< / ><>29.79< / ><>44.94< / ><>24.42< / ><>2.69< / ><>15.28< / ><>613.73< / >< / table>

<><>股票< / ><>价格< / ><>+ / -涨跌< / ><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / ><>市值 (十亿)< / >< / ><><>信越化学< / ><>6234.00< / ><>-87.00< / ><>7930.00< / ><>4366.00< / ><>2.18< / ><>24.67< / ><>12374.46< / >< / ><><>软银< / ><>240.70< / ><>1.10< / ><>252.90< / ><>202.60< / ><>3.66< / ><>21.21< / ><>11565.92< / >< / ><><>软银集团< / ><>6310.00< / ><>15.00< / ><>27695.00< / ><>3365.00< / ><>0.17< / ><>7.22< / ><>36041.76< / >< / ><><>索尼金融集团< / ><>148.80< / ><>-0.50< / ><>180.40< / ><>129.30< / ><>5.38< / ><>18.89< / ><>1007.43< / >< / ><><>索尼集团< / ><>3743.00< / ><>-25.00< / ><>4776.00< / ><>3643.00< / ><>0.94< / ><>68.43< / ><>22328.18< / >< / ><><>三井住友< / >

Financial< / td> 3372.00< / ><>-57.00< / ><>7260.00< / ><>3300.00< / ><>2.67< / ><>16.37< / ><>25634.79< / >< / tr> <>武田药品工业 (Takeda Pharmaceutical)< / ><>5766.00< / ><>47.00< / ><>6033.00< / ><>4102.00< / ><>3.54< / ><>59.60< / ><>9237.95< / >< / ><><>东京海上控股 (Tokio Marine Holdings)< / ><>516.00< / ><>-6.30< / ><>8468.00< / ><>501.00< / ><>3.17< / ><>27.71< / ><>14698.16< / >< / ><><>东京电子 (Tokyo Electron)< / ><>12500.00< / ><>-305.00< / ><>81260.00< / ><>11270.00< / ><>1.27< / ><>49.82< / ><>25625.02< / >< / ><><>丰田汽车 (Toyota Motor)< / ><>2900.50< / ><>-30.00< / ><>4000.00< / ><>2666.00< / ><>3.45< / ><>9.82< / ><>42332.76< / >< / table>

<><>Equinor 大韩民国 (KRW)< / ><>403.50< / ><>-6.50< / ><>426.00< / ><>226.40< / ><>3.65< / ><>207.99< / ><>964.67< / >< / ><><>LG能源解决方案 (LG Energy Solution)< / ><>391000.00< / ><>1000.00< / ><>527000.00< / ><>296500.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>85.28< / ><>91494.00< / >< / ><><>三星生物药 (SAMSUNG BIOLOGICS)< / ><>1277000.00< / ><>-33000.00< / ><>1987000.00< / ><>1003000.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>53.37< / ><>59113.54< / >< / ><><>三星电子 (Samsung Electronics)< / ><>266500.00< / ><>-3500.00< / ><>374500.00< / ><>90200.00< / ><>0.63< / ><>40.65< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>三星电子优先股 (Samsung Electronics Pref)< / ><>198000.00< / ><>-200.00< / ><>243500.00< / ><>70400.00< / ><>0.85< / ><>187.22< / ><>158889.50< / >< / ><><>三星

Epis< / ><>368000.00< / ><>-2500.00< / ><>773000.00< / ><>324500.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>292.16< / ><>9181.85< / >< / ><><>SK海力士 (SK hyrix)< / ><>1723000.00< / ><>-50000.00< / ><>2987000.00< / ><>403000.00< / ><>0.17< / ><>27.77< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>

<><>BioNTech 香港 (HKD)< / ><>95.25< / ><>-0.48< / ><>124.00< / ><>79.52< / ><>0.00< / ><>45.57< / ><>24.09< / >< / ><><>友邦保险 (AIA Group)< / ><>68.80< / ><>< / ><>92.15< / ><>68.00< / ><>2.88< / ><>116.41< / ><>711.85< / >< / ><><>香港交易所 (HKEX)< / ><>379.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>460.20< / ><>360.00< / ><>3.68< / ><>26.98< / ><>480.51< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">沙特阿拉伯 (SAN)< / >< / ><><>ACWA Power< / ><>171.10< / ><>-4.40< / ><>252.60< / ><>154.50< / ><>0.27< / ><>69.27< / ><>131.15< / >< / ><><>拉吉希银行 (Al Rajhi Bank)< / ><>63.20< / ><>-0.55< / ><>110.00< / ><>62.00< / ><>4.76< / ><>16.21< / ><>379.20< / >< / ><><>沙特阿拉伯矿业 (Saudi Arabian Mining)< / ><>63.00< / ><>-0.85< / ><>79.90< / ><>54.90< / ><>0.00< / ><>32.98< / ><>244.99< / >< / ><><>沙特阿拉伯石油公司 (Saudi Arabian Oil)< / ><>25.84< / ><>0.04< / ><>27.96< / ><>23.29< / ><>5.25< / ><>17.94< / ><>62.53< / >< / ><><>沙特基础工业公司 (Saudi Basic Industries)< / ><>46.56< / ><>-0.08< / ><>62.50< / ><>45.70< / ><>5.58< / ><>5.42< / ><>139.68< / >< / ><><>沙特国家银行 (Saudi National Bank)< / ><>39.08< / ><>0.06< / ><>45.24< / ><>36.00< / ><>5.89< / ><>9.67< / ><>234.48< / >< / ><><>STC

Co< / ><>43.00< / ><>0.20< / ><>45.38< / ><>41.14< / ><>5.12< / ><>14.48< / ><>215.00< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">印度 (UNIV)< / >< / ><><>Bajra Finance< / ><>964.10< / ><>2.30< / ><>1177.60< / ><>788.40< / ><>0.62< / ><>50.60< / ><>6002.45< / >< / ><><>Brah Amrit Ltd< / ><>1833.00< / ><>24.00< / ><>2174.70< / ><>1728.05< / ><>1.31< / ><>140.03< / ><>11438.84< / >< / ><><>HCL科技 (HCL Technologies)< / ><>1183.80< / ><>-18.30< / ><>1770.00< / ><>1030.00< / ><>5.07< / ><>18.45< / ><>3212.44< / >< / ><><>HEPC银行 (HEPC Bank)< / ><>703.80< / ><>-6.40< / ><>1023.05< / ><>682.00< / ><>1.85< / ><>14.22< / ><>10851.61< / >< / ><><>印度联合利华 (Hindustan Unilever)< / ><>1868.00< / ><>-24.10< / ><>2667.55< / ><>1827.10< / ><>2.19< / ><>42.71< / ><>4385.04< / >< / ><><>ICICI

Bank< / td> 1357.00< / ><>15.40< / ><>1473.90< / ><>1187.55< / ><>0.88< / ><>21.47< / ><>7411.56< / >< / tr> <>Infosys< / ><>992.10< / ><>-20.90< / ><>1737.85< / ><>980.30< / ><>4.84< / ><>15.38< / ><>4028.22< / >< / ><><>Lfd Ltd< / ><>285.30< / ><>-1.20< / ><>435.60< / ><>254.75< / ><>5.47< / ><>9.55< / ><>3234.25< / >< / ><><>Kohl Mahindra Bank< / ><>1468.00< / ><>-9.55< / ><>435.50< / ><>305.75< / ><>0.15< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Lancor & Todso< / ><>3699.00< / ><>-74.00< / ><>4440.00< / ><>3288.65< / ><>1.03< / ><>31.63< / ><>5099.44< / >< / ><><>Life Insurance Corp< / ><>386.10< / ><>-3.90< / ><>936.60< / ><>385.25< / ><>2.59< / ><>13.57< / ><>4848.16< / >< / ><><>Maruti Suzuki

< / ><>11489.85< / ><>-113.15< / ><>17371.60< / ><>11304.30< / ><>1.22< / ><>24.61< / ><>3612.44< / >< / ><><>Reliance Industries< / ><>1206.65< / ><>-12.25< / ><>1611.20< / ><>1161.00< / ><>0.50< / ><>23.44< / ><>16329.04< / >< / ><><>State Bank of India< / ><>952.80< / ><>-4.45< / ><>1234.80< / ><>857.30< / ><>1.82< / ><>10.96< / ><>8795.07< / >< / ><><>Sun Pharmaceutical Inds< / ><>1783.25< / ><>-17.75< / ><>2047.55< / ><>1586.60< / ><>0.90< / ><>39.11< / ><>4278.51< / >< / ><><>Tata Consultancy Svs< / ><>2084.00< / ><>-14.00< / ><>3336.70< / ><>1976.00< / ><>3.12< / ><>15.53< / ><>7540.09< / >< / table>

<><>中国农业银行< / ><>58< / ><>0.03< / ><>6.71< / ><>5.05< / ><>4.62< / ><>8.43< / ><>202.11< / >< / ><><>阿里巴巴集团控股< / ><>105.40< / ><>-2.80< / ><>179.00< / ><>88.65< / ><>0.98< / ><>126.99< / ><>2097.67< / >< / ><><>中国银行< / ><>5.99< / ><>-0.03< / ><>6.14< / ><>4.11< / ><>4.61< / ><>8.09< / ><>500.48< / >< / ><><>交通银行< / ><>8.21< / ><>-0.03< / ><>8.38< / ><>6.33< / ><>4.80< / ><>7.60< / ><>297.27< / >< / ><><>BPO< / ><>74.55< / ><>-0.45< / ><>113.40< / ><>71.40< / ><>0.55< / ><>20.82< / ><>274.60< / >< / ><><>中信银行< / ><>8.26< / ><>-0.01< / ><>8.70< / ><>6.50< / ><>5.61< / ><>6.88< / ><>122.93< / >< / ><><>中国建设银行

H< / ><>9.63< / ><>-0.02< / ><>9.90< / ><>7.18< / ><>4.91< / ><>7.41< / ><>23.15< / >< / ><><>中国人寿保险< / ><>27.26< / ><>-0.04< / ><>36.16< / ><>20.90< / ><>4.13< / ><>5.00< / ><>202.85< / >< / ><><>招商银行 H< / ><>50.95< / ><>-0.05< / ><>53.70< / ><>43.34< / ><>4.46< / ><>8.94< / ><>233.91< / >< / ><><>中国石油化工 H< / ><>4.42< / ><>0.03< / ><>5.70< / ><>3.98< / ><>5.68< / ><>16.87< / ><>104.65< / >< / ><><>中国神华能源 H< / ><>43.24< / ><>0.06< / ><>49.62< / ><>37.54< / ><>5.37< / ><>15.84< / ><>146.04< / >< / ><><>中信证券 H< / ><>24.00< / ><>-0.02< / ><>32.50< / ><>23.24< / ><>4.08< / ><>12.24< / ><>82.17< / >< / ><><>ICBC

H< / td> 7.58< / ><>< / ><>7.77< / ><>5.56< / ><>4.94< / ><>7.58< / ><>657.90< / >< / tr> <>京东 A< / ><>104.90< / ><>1.30< / ><>137.20< / ><>95.80< / ><>3.74< / ><>15.22< / ><>261.88< / >< / ><><>美团 B< / ><>70.15< / ><>-0.65< / ><>108.00< / ><>63.65< / ><>0.00< / ><>18.27< / ><>392.58< / >< / ><><>中集集团 H< / ><>90.45< / ><>-0.35< / ><>101.70< / ><>77.65< / ><>5.56< / ><>15.59< / ><>58.87< / >< / ><><>网易< / ><>188.50< / ><>2.90< / ><>244.80< / ><>168.80< / ><>2.44< / ><>17.80< / ><>605.47< / >< / ><><>农夫山泉 H< / ><>39.76< / ><>0.40< / ><>56.25< / ><>37.90< / ><>2.84< / ><>28.18< / ><>200.18< / >< / ><><>中国石油 H< / ><>9.59< / ><>-0.09< / ><>12.22< / ><>7.05< / ><>6.13< / ><>11.15< / ><>202.23< / >< / ><><>中国平安保险集团

H< / ><>51.50< / ><>-0.05< / ><>74.70< / ><>50.00< / ><>6.11< / ><>6.71< / ><>383.55< / >< / ><><>中国邮政储蓄银行 H< / ><>5.37< / ><>-0.01< / ><>5.78< / ><>4.48< / ><>4.98< / ><>7.35< / ><>106.53< / >< / ><><>腾讯控股< / ><>420.60< / ><>-7.60< / ><>681.00< / ><>411.00< / ><>1.26< / ><>16.99< / ><>3824.35< / >< / ><><>小米公司 B< / ><>23.94< / ><>-0.32< / ><>54.70< / ><>21.30< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.78< / ><>511.49< / >< / ><><>紫金矿业集团 H< / ><>32.36< / ><>-0.22< / ><>46.98< / ><>26.58< / ><>2.85< / ><>16.59< / ><>193.80< / >< / ><><>美元 (USD)< / ><>< / >< / ><><>满帮集团< / ><>8.35< / ><>-0.09< / ><>14.02< / ><>7.46< / ><>2.77< / ><>278.33< / ><>155.73< / >< / ><><>Fidis Holdings

A< / ><>109.68< / ><>-3.53< / ><>202.53< / ><>80.50< / ><>2.32< / ><>10.50< / ><>84.02< / >< / ><><>Hindi Holdings A< / ><>78.50< / ><>0.10< / ><>139.41< / ><>71.94< / ><>0.00< / ><>31.40< / ><>445.77< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">新加坡 (SGD)< / >< / ><><>星展集团控股< / ><>77.49< / ><>-1.07< / ><>79.05< / ><>51.80< / ><>4.10< / ><>20.18< / ><>220.38< / >< / ><><>华侨银行< / ><>30.30< / ><>-1.90< / ><>32.57< / ><>16.62< / ><>3.47< / ><>1858.90< / ><>136.81< / >< / ><><>大华银行< / ><>42.44< / ><>-1.28< / ><>45.15< / ><>33.25< / ><>3.75< / ><>15.38< / ><>70.54< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">新加坡 (USD)< / >< / ><><>JOYY A< / ><>81.33< / ><>0.68< / ><>81.35< / ><>54.24< / ><>6.62< / ><>325.32< / ><>53.11< / >< / ><><>Sea / 新加坡 A< / ><>94.66< / ><>-1.87< / ><>193.48< / ><>77.05< / ><>0.00< / ><>35.72< / ><>51.73< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">印度尼西亚 (EUR)< / >< / ><><>中亚银行< / ><>6050.00< / ><>-50.00< / ><>6750.00< / ><>4820.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.96< / ><>7458.14< / >< / ><><>PT Bantu Renewables< / ><>2850.00< / ><>70.00< / ><>10725.00< / ><>2300.00< / ><>0.14< / ><>0.00< / ><>812.91< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">意大利 (EUR)< / >< / ><><>忠利保险 (Generali)< / ><>41.62< / ><>-0.58< / ><>46.24< / ><>31.76< / ><>3.94< / ><>17.13< / ><>63.87< / >< / ><><>国家电力公司 (Enel)< / ><>8.73< / ><>-0.11< / ><>10.31< / ><>8.11< / ><>5.62< / ><>23.58< / ><>86.72< / >< / ><><>埃尼 (Eni)< / ><>24.23< / ><>0.10< / ><>25.02< / ><>14.54< / ><>4.54< / ><>17.19< / ><>73.38< / >< / ><><>法拉利< / ><>345.15< / ><>-0.10< / ><>428.50< / ><>269.00< / ><>0.87< / ><>49.95< / ><>61.19< / >< / ><><>联合信贷 (Intesa)

Sanpaolo< / td> 6.24< / ><>-0.26< / ><>6.94< / ><>4.81< / ><>6.02< / ><>27.15< / ><>110.41< / >< / tr> <>Stellantis< / ><>4.12< / ><>0.06< / ><>10.49< / ><>3.61< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.54< / ><>11.95< / >< / ><><>UniCredit SpA< / ><>77.72< / ><>-3.39< / ><>86.42< / ><>57.36< / ><>4.05< / ><>15.22< / ><>121.37< / >< / table>

<><>佳能 (Canon)< / ><>4619.00< / ><>-24.00< / ><>5032.00< / ><>3987.00< / ><>3.46< / ><>15.55< / ><>6160.55< / >< / ><><>Chagas Pharmaceutical< / ><>6110.00< / ><>-19.00< / ><>10700.00< / ><>5591.00< / ><>2.16< / ><>23.13< / ><>10242.93< / >< / ><><>卡特彼勒 (Caterpillar)< / ><>2732.50< / ><>-87.50< / ><>4178.00< / ><>2296.00< / ><>3.70< / ><>17.08< / ><>5264.47< / >< / ><><>迅销 (FAST RETAILING)< / ><>74780.00< / ><>-810.00< / ><>86690.00< / ><>64580.00< / ><>0.86< / ><>22.98< / ><>12376.56< / >< / ><><>Hiscox< / ><>5648.00< / ><>-11.00< / ><>6035.00< / ><>4222.00< / ><>0.99< / ><>42.20< / ><>25621.38< / >< / ><><>本田 (Honda)

0.43< / >< / ><><>三菱重工 (Mitsubishi Heavy Corp)< / ><>3911.00< / ><>-24.00< / ><>5336.00< / ><>3464.00< / ><>0.78< / ><>38.55< / ><>12856.57< / >< / ><><>三菱美国金融集团 (Mitsubishi U.S. Finl Grp)< / ><>3622.00< / ><>-49.00< / ><>3813.00< / ><>2235.50< / ><>3.65< / ><>16.98< / ><>42984.85< / >< / ><><>瑞穗金融 (Mizuho Financiero)< / ><>4587.00< / ><>-14.00< / ><>4657.00< / ><>3465.00< / ><>1.74< / ><>17.19< / ><>21155.84< / >< / ><><>Micronu Financial Group< / ><>8644.00< / ><>-213.00< / ><>8983.00< / ><>4560.00< / ><>1.74< / ><>21.15< / ><>11519.84< / >< / ><><>任天堂 (Nintendo)< / ><>7775.00< / ><>-40.00< / ><>14363.00< / ><>6544.00< / ><>2.08< / ><>21.33< / ><>10008.45< / >< / ><><>NTT< / ><>172.10< / ><>2.00< / ><>180.10< / ><>142.60< / ><>3.14< / ><>13.65< / ><>15560.71< / >< / ><><>Recruit

Holdings< / ><>17000.00< / ><>25.00< / ><>18215.00< / ><>6040.00< / ><>0.15< / ><>48.60< / ><>25620.57< / >< / table>

<><>Naspers N< / ><>708.91< / ><>1.04< / ><>1295.72< / ><>690.05< / ><>0.72< / ><>84.03< / ><>528.09< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">西班牙 (欧元)< / >< / ><><>桑坦德银行 (Banco Santander)< / ><>12.26< / ><>-0.26< / ><>13.12< / ><>8.10< / ><>1.66< / ><>13.47< / ><>178.46< / >< / ><><>BBVA Sporin< / ><>23.43< / ><>-0.85< / ><>25.57< / ><>15.39< / ><>3.35< / ><>90.12< / ><>129.12< / >< / ><><>CaixaBank< / ><>11.93< / ><>-0.43< / ><>13.55< / ><>8.57< / ><>3.40< / ><>35.07< / ><>83.19< / >< / ><><>Berdrolsa SA< / ><>20.93< / ><>-0.06< / ><>22.08< / ><>16.18< / ><>2.63< / ><>37.92< / ><>139.67< / >< / ><><>NxtExx< / ><>53.34< / ><>-0.48< / ><>59.42< / ><>46.07< / ><>2.66< / ><>120.95< / ><>166.24< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">瑞典 (瑞典克朗)< / >< / ><><>阿特拉斯·科普柯 A (Atlas Copco A)< / ><>206.70< / ><>-6.70< / ><>214.10< / ><>149.45< / ><>1.45< / ><>38.07< / ><>694.01< / >< / ><><>阿特拉斯·科普柯 B (Atlas Copco B)< / ><>180.30< / ><>-5.20< / ><>186.05< / ><>134.00< / ><>1.66< / ><>33.20< / ><>281.43< / >< / ><><>EQT< / ><>279.50< / ><>-8.90< / ><>383.00< / ><>258.00< / ><>1.79< / ><>451.54< / ><>365.30< / >< / ><><>Investor B< / ><>407.50< / ><>-3.50< / ><>426.80< / ><>301.50< / ><>1.37< / ><>7.92< / ><>742.44< / >< / ><><>沃尔沃 B (Volvo B)< / ><>312.40< / ><>-2.60< / ><>374.50< / ><>244.90< / ><>4.16< / ><>18.44< / ><>497.56< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">瑞士

(CHF)< / td>< / tr> ABB< / ><>79.88< / ><>-2.70< / ><>89.14< / ><>53.78< / ><>1.18< / ><>30.84< / ><>145.63< / >< / ><><>Alcon< / ><>52.70< / ><>0.02< / ><>68.34< / ><>47.80< / ><>0.53< / ><>50.67< / ><>26.33< / >< / ><><>Civic Financiers Ricetomb< / ><>172.60< / ><>-2.25< / ><>202.20< / ><>127.20< / ><>1.91< / ><>36.81< / ><>92.79< / >< / ><><>Gravisden< / ><>3418.00< / ><>16.00< / ><>3592.00< / ><>2566.00< / ><>2.11< / ><>38.39< / ><>31.56< / >< / ><><>Holcim< / ><>83.68< / ><>-2.16< / ><>82.54< / ><>60.10< / ><>2.67< / ><>19.78< / ><>36.10< / >< / ><><>Lorsa

Group< / ><>577.20< / ><>1.00< / ><>597.80< / ><>454.60< / ><>0.87< / ><>64.64< / ><>40.54< / >< / ><><>Nestle< / ><>75.56< / ><>0.36< / ><>87.09< / ><>70.29< / ><>4.10< / ><>21.53< / ><>194.68< / >< / ><><>Nestris< / ><>120.02< / ><>2.84< / ><>132.68< / ><>97.05< / ><>3.08< / ><>39.35< / ><>244.22< / >< / ><><>罗氏制药< / ><>368.80< / ><>9.60< / ><>383.00< / ><>270.80< / ><>2.66< / ><>22.79< / ><>38.35< / >< / ><><>罗氏制药优先股< / ><>360.00< / ><>10.20< / ><>375.80< / ><>291.00< / ><>2.72< / ><>22.25< / ><>252.92< / >< / ><><>Sika< / ><>173.75< / ><>-1.75< / ><>197.60< / ><>120.35< / ><>2.13< / ><>26.73< / ><>27.88< / >< / ><><>瑞士再保险< / ><>143.75< / ><>0.70< / ><>153.85< / ><>114.05< / ><>4.38< / ><>11.02< / ><>42.95< / >< / ><><>瑞银

集团< / ><>39.33< / ><>-1.24< / ><>45.04< / ><>28.25< / ><>2.18< / ><>20.07< / ><>128.92< / >< / ><><>苏黎世保险集团< / ><>573.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>626.00< / ><>521.00< / ><>5.24< / ><>17.92< / ><>86.65< / >< / table>

<><>鸿海精密< / ><>252.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>314.00< / ><>187.50< / ><>2.85< / ><>18.52< / ><>3547.09< / >< / ><><>联发科< / ><>4835.00< / ><>-85.00< / ><>5480.00< / ><>1130.00< / ><>1.11< / ><>73.08< / ><>7759.95< / >< / ><><>台积电< / ><>2585.00< / ><>< / ><>2590.00< / ><>1375.00< / ><>1.01< / >< colspan="2">39.0167035.18< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">阿拉伯联合酋长国 (AED)< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">油田 (US$)< / >< / ><><>3i Group Plc< / ><>23.52< / ><>-0.39< / ><>44.97< / ><>18.25< / ><>3.59< / ><>4.36< / ><>24.06< / >< / ><><>阿斯利康< / ><>118.92< / ><>-2.88< / ><>157.32< / ><>98.92< / ><>2.01< / ><>23.83< / ><>184.45< / >< / ><><>BAE Systems< / ><>18.36< / ><>0.10< / ><>23.60< / ><>15.29< / ><>2.06< / ><>26.69< / ><>55.10< / >< / ><><>巴克莱< / ><>4.26< / ><>-0.06< / ><>5.54< / ><>3.54< / ><>2.70< / ><>9.73< / ><>56.96< / >< / ><><>BP< / ><>5.85< / ><>0.23< / ><>6.09< / ><>3.99< / ><>4.29< / ><>< / ><>91.85< / >< / ><><>英美烟草< / ><>41.61< / ><>0.77< / ><>53.26< / ><>36.77< / ><>5.89< / ><>11.85< / ><>89.76< / >< / ><><>Compass

Group< / ><>23.25< / ><>0.18< / ><>25.81< / ><>20.00< / ><>2.18< / ><>27.93< / ><>39.53< / >< / ><><>帝亚吉欧< / ><>16.22< / ><>0.11< / ><>19.04< / ><>12.96< / ><>2.33< / ><>27.47< / ><>36.13< / >< / ><><>Experian< / ><>25.74< / ><>0.31< / ><>37.07< / ><>22.03< / ><>2.01< / ><>20.70< / ><>22.65< / >< / ><><>嘉能可< / ><>5.69< / ><>-0.00< / ><>7.07< / ><>3.32< / ><>2.26< / ><>< / ><>66.71< / >< / table>

股票< / td><>价格< / ><>涨跌< / ><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / ><>市值 (十亿)< / >< / tr><><>GSX< / ><>17.36< / ><>-0.55< / ><>22.82< / ><>15.92< / ><>4.03< / ><>12.30< / ><>74.91< / >< / ><><>Haleon< / ><>3.44< / ><>0.02< / ><>4.16< / ><>3.18< / ><>2.12< / ><>18.51< / ><>30.29< / >< / ><><>汇丰控股 (HSBC Holdings)< / ><>13.81< / ><>-0.27< / ><>16.10< / ><>9.59< / ><>4.03< / ><>15.09< / ><>236.57< / >< / ><><>劳埃德银行集团 (Lloyds Banking Group)< / ><>1.01< / ><>-0.02< / ><>1.18< / ><>0.82< / ><>3.99< / ><>14.37< / ><>57.87< / >< / ><><>伦敦证券交易所集团 (London Stock Exchange Grp)< / ><>84.70< / ><>1.54< / ><>101.40< / ><>66.84< / ><>1.87< / ><>35.53< / ><>40.84< / >< / ><><>国家电网 (National Grid)< / ><>11.53< / ><>0.03< / ><>14.29< / ><>10.86< / ><>4.21< / ><>17.60< / ><>57.94< / >< / ><><>国民西敏斯特银行集团 (NatWest Group)< / ><>6.40< / ><>-0.10< / ><>7.26< / ><>5.04< / ><>5.47< / ><>11.96< / ><>50.75< / >< / ><><>利洁时集团 (Reckitt Benckiser Group)< / ><>50.72< / ><>-0.34< / ><>65.23< / ><>36.64< / ><>4.27< / ><>10.83< / ><>32.15< / >< / ><><>RELX< / ><>25.95< / ><>-0.04< / ><>35.39< / ><>19.91< / ><>2.66< / ><>23.05< / ><>45.23< / >< / ><><>力拓 (Rio Tinto)< / ><>70.22< / ><>< / ><>91.17< / ><>49.55< / ><>4.96< / ><>15.13< / ><>88.14< / >< / ><><>罗尔斯-罗伊斯控股 (Rolls-Royce Holdings)< / ><>13.67< / ><>-0.37< / ><>15.86< / ><>9.90< / ><>0.80< / ><>19.69< / ><>113.38< / >< / ><><>壳牌 (Shell)< / ><>37.80< / ><>1.32< / ><>37.84< / ><>25.54< / ><>2.98< / ><>16.50< / ><>216.34< / >< / ><><>联合利华 (Unilever)< / ><>46.26< / ><>0.03< / ><>55.42< / ><>36.44< / ><>3.57< / ><>12.61< / ><>99.66< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="5">官方利率< / >< / ><><>< / ><>利率类型< / ><>当前< / ><>生效日期< / ><>前次< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>联邦基金利率< / ><>3.75-4.00< / ><>16-09-2026< / ><>3.50-3.75< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>最优惠利率< / ><>7.00< / ><>16-09-2026< / ><>6.75< / >< / ><><>美国< / ><>贴现率< / ><>4.00< / ><>16-09-2026< / ><>3.75< / >< / ><><>欧元区< / ><>回购利率< / ><>2.65< / ><>16-09-2026< / ><>2.40< / >< / ><><>英国< / ><>回购利率< / ><>3.75< / ><>18-12-2025< / ><>4.00< / >< / ><><>日本< / ><>隔夜拆借利率< / ><>1.25< / ><>18-09-2026< / ><>1.00< / >< / ><><>瑞士< / ><>瑞士国家银行 (SNB)< / ><>0.00< / ><>19-06-2025< / ><>0.25< / >< / table>

大宗商品

<><>Am Holdings< / ><>294.37< / ><>-8.19< / ><>452.70< / ><>100.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>346.32< / ><>313.21< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">美国 (美元)< / >< / ><><>3M公司 (3M Co)< / ><>162.12< / ><>-1.52< / ><>184.90< / ><>139.34< / ><>1.92< / ><>28.59< / ><>83.61< / >< / ><><>雅培实验室 (Abbott Laboratories)< / ><>98.73< / ><>0.57< / ><>135.12< / ><>81.97< / ><>2.55< / ><>31.85< / ><>170.84< / >< / ><><>艾伯维 (AbbVie)< / ><>271.36< / ><>4.67< / ><>269.39< / ><>190.75< / ><>2.55< / ><>76.66< / ><>479.52< / >< / ><><>埃森哲 (Accenture Plc)

A< / td> 196.64< / ><>3.24< / ><>291.09< / ><>118.15< / ><>3.48< / ><>15.57< / ><>120.33< / >< / tr> <>Adobe< / ><>232.77< / ><>-5.35< / ><>363.70< / ><>190.12< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.98< / ><>90.59< / >< / ><><>Aflac< / ><>112.74< / ><>-0.89< / ><>130.22< / ><>105.43< / ><>2.16< / ><>12.11< / ><>56.52< / >< / ><><>Air Products & Chemicals< / ><>278.12< / ><>-2.88< / ><>314.87< / ><>229.11< / ><>2.60< / ><>29.31< / ><>61.93< / >< / ><><>Autiva A< / ><>160.63< / ><>0.24< / ><>193.45< / ><>110.81< / ><>0.00< / ><>42.83< / ><>67.39< / >< / ><><>Alphabet A< / ><>350.50< / ><>2.82< / ><>406.81< / ><>235.84< / ><>0.25< / ><>17.39< / ><>2056.73< / >< / ><><>Alphabet C< / ><>347.37< / ><>2.78< / ><>404.47< / ><>236.69< / ><>0.25< / ><>17.23< / ><>1591.91< / >< / ><><>Altia

Group< / ><>69.38< / ><>0.83< / ><>77.06< / ><>54.70< / ><>6.40< / ><>14.48< / ><>115.85< / >< / ><><>Amazon.com< / ><>259.92< / ><>3.63< / ><>287.20< / ><>196.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>20.61< / ><>2803.58< / >< / ><><>AMG Electric< / ><>645.86< / ><>-3.56< / ><>658.52< / ><>168.22< / ><>0.00< / ><>162.69< / ><>1504.35< / >< / ><><>American Tower< / ><>100.00< / ><>-0.00< / ><>100.00< / ><>75.53< / ><>3.11< / ><>20.99< / ><>66.47< / >< / ><><>American Express< / ><>304.25< / ><>-0.30< / ><>387.45< / ><>290.82< / ><>0.46< / ><>14.76< / ><>114.46< / >< / ><><>American International< / ><>75.66< / ><>0.55< / ><>87.29< / ><>71.25< / ><>2.64< / ><>13.68< / ><>39.56< / >< / ><><>American

Tower< / ><>166.18< / ><>1.40< / ><>196.08< / ><>160.06< / ><>4.25< / ><>22.80< / ><>77.43< / >< / ><><>Ameriprise Financial< / ><>490.56< / ><>-6.05< / ><>572.56< / ><>422.37< / ><>1.39< / ><>11.69< / ><>43.33< / >< / ><><>AMETEK Inc< / ><>249.62< / ><>-5.10< / ><>261.16< / ><>179.24< / ><>0.55< / ><>36.24< / ><>57.00< / >< / ><><>Avgen< / ><>413.08< / ><>10.48< / ><>447.03< / ><>288.00< / ><>2.44< / ><>25.47< / ><>223.32< / >< / ><><>Amphend A< / ><>87.55< / ><>-1.07< / ><>178.52< / ><>76.74< / ><>0.57< / ><>41.69< / ><>215.90< / >< / ><><>Analog Devices< / ><>410.08< / ><>-10.47< / ><>445.91< / ><>223.47< / ><>1.07< / ><>48.42< / ><>198.71< / >< / ><><>Asn Plc

A< / ><>270.47< / ><>-3.52< / ><>382.34< / ><>266.33< / ><>1.21< / ><>14.84< / ><>57.37< / >< / ><><>Apollo Global Mgmt< / ><>115.55< / ><>-0.40< / ><>153.29< / ><>99.56< / ><>1.95< / ><>40.69< / ><>68.24< / >< / ><><>Apple< / ><>336.67< / ><>3.04< / ><>345.34< / ><>243.42< / ><>0.32< / ><>38.43< / ><>4913.42< / >< / ><><>Applied Materials Inc< / ><>520.65< / ><>-9.62< / ><>739.67< / ><>203.40< / ><>0.41< / ><>44.58< / ><>413.19< / >< / ><><>Agilent A< / ><>281.29< / ><>2.51< / ><>738.01< / ><>266.84< / ><>0.00< / ><>21.54< / ><>85.64< / >< / ><><>Aree Management< / ><>115.75< / ><>-1.99< / ><>161.19< / ><>95.80< / ><>4.87< / ><>53.10< / ><>25.92< / >< / ><><>Arthur J.

Gallagher< / td> 227.10< / ><>-2.75< / ><>313.09< / ><>199.75< / ><>1.23< / ><>37.23< / ><>58.21< / >< / tr> <>AT&T< / ><>24.47< / ><>0.04< / ><>29.43< / ><>19.89< / ><>4.54< / ><>8.08< / ><>167.68< / >< / ><><>Atlassian Corp A< / ><>195.79< / ><>1.81< / ><>200.00< / ><>56.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>92.33< / ><>31.13< / >< / ><><>Austark< / ><>235.05< / ><>3.77< / ><>324.00< / ><>185.50< / ><>0.00< / ><>30.25< / ><>49.13< / >< / ><><>Auto Data Processing< / ><>264.00< / ><>1.64< / ><>293.51< / ><>188.16< / ><>2.58< / ><>24.07< / ><>104.61< / >< / ><><>AutoZone< / ><>2846.27< / ><>-52.30< / ><>4170.00< / ><>2730.65< / ><>0.00< / ><>19.09< / ><>46.47< / >< / ><><>Baker Hughes

A< / ><>55.41< / ><>-1.72< / ><>70.41< / ><>43.92< / ><>1.66< / ><>17.59< / ><>55.00< / >< / ><><>纽约梅隆银行 (Bank of New York Mellon)< / ><>142.72< / ><>-1.01< / ><>165.84< / ><>103.11< / ><>1.77< / ><>16.48< / ><>96.84< / >< / ><><>碧迪肯 (Becton Dickinson)< / ><>180.16< / ><>-0.14< / ><>213.08< / ><>140.11< / ><>2.33< / ><>31.06< / ><>49.07< / >< / ><><>波克夏·海瑟威 A (Berkshire Hathaway A)< / ><>75990.00< / ><>174.00< / ><>86912.01< / ><>68600.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>85.35< / ><>84.38< / >< / ><><>波克夏·海瑟威 B (Berkshire Hathaway B)< / ><>538.25< / ><>0.71< / ><>537.74< / ><>464.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>19.52< / ><>70.88< / >< / ><><>贝莱德

金融 (BlackRock Finance)< / ><>1089.63< / ><>-9.79< / ><>1219.94< / ><>917.39< / ><>2.14< / ><>25.24< / ><>165.65< / >< / ><><>黑石 (Blackstone)< / ><>111.83< / ><>-1.53< / ><>169.21< / ><>101.73< / ><>2.96< / ><>25.02< / ><>83.94< / >< / ><><>黑石 A (Blackstone A)< / ><>76.07< / ><>-0.42< / ><>87.92< / ><>61.12< / ><>1.16< / ><>131.41< / ><>107.86< / >< / ><><>波音公司 (Boeing Co)< / ><>198.32< / ><>-1.90< / ><>254.24< / ><>178.77< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.50< / ><>148.84< / >< / ><><>Boil Corp< / ><>53.52< / ><>-0.57< / ><>65.22< / ><>46.12< / ><>2.39< / ><>12.16< / ><>374.25< / >< / ><><>Booking Holdings< / ><>155.87< / ><>-1.76< / ><>5520.15< / ><>150.14< / ><>1.05< / ><>17.22< / ><>117.12< / >< / ><><>波士顿

科学 (Boston Scientific)< / ><>41.58< / ><>-0.61< / ><>105.65< / ><>41.94< / ><>0.00< / ><>16.70< / ><>60.26< / >< / ><><>百时美施贵宝 (Bristol Myers Squibb)< / ><>59.70< / ><>0.11< / ><>68.64< / ><>42.52< / ><>4.22< / ><>13.09< / ><>121.95< / >< / ><><>博通 (Broadcom)< / ><>376.51< / ><>0.70< / ><>495.00< / ><>289.96< / ><>0.69< / ><>46.66< / ><>1797.32< / >< / ><><>楷登电子 (Cadence Design Systems)< / ><>356.12< / ><>-3.43< / ><>416.69< / ><>262.75< / ><>0.00< / ><>70.38< / ><>98.07< / >< / ><><>第一资本金融 (Capital One Financial)< / ><>195.91< / ><>0.09< / ><>258.63< / ><>174.24< / ><>1.63< / ><>10.79< / ><>120.19< / >< / ><><>开利全球 (Carrier Global)< / ><>55.00< / ><>-1.10< / ><>76.76< / ><>50.24< / ><>1.75< / ><>38.73< / ><>45.34< / >< / ><><>Cavana

A< / ><>62.76< / ><>-1.12< / ><>466.89< / ><>56.12< / ><>0.00< / ><>28.14< / ><>45.18< / >< / ><><>卡特彼勒 (Carepillar)< / ><>813.83< / ><>-49.61< / ><>1073.46< / ><>483.55< / ><>0.80< / ><>34.87< / ><>374.10< / >< / ><><>CROE Group A< / ><>127.56< / ><>-3.10< / ><>174.27< / ><>121.69< / ><>0.00< / ><>32.88< / ><>36.94< / >< / ><><>Cencora< / ><>317.25< / ><>0.88< / ><>377.54< / ><>244.82< / ><>0.76< / ><>23.45< / ><>60.54< / >< / ><><>特许通讯 A (Charter Comms A)< / ><>106.96< / ><>-1.68< / ><>284.60< / ><>104.91< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.75< / ><>12.26< / >< / ><><>切尼尔能源 (Cheniere Energy)< / ><>272.28< / ><>-1.86< / ><>388.87< / ><>277.88< / ><>0.00< / ><>19.89< / ><>56.88< / >< / ><><>奇波雷墨西哥 (Chipotle mexican< / >

Engle< / td> 205.15< / ><>-2.43< / ><>217.78< / ><>146.49< / ><>3.47< / ><>19.69< / ><>405.33< / >< / tr> <>奇波雷墨西哥格里尔 (Chipotle Mexican Grill)< / ><>30.77< / ><>-0.13< / ><>42.81< / ><>28.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>28.23< / ><>38.94< / >< / ><><>处罚保险 (Chubb)< / ><>334.70< / ><>0.49< / ><>365.91< / ><>265.30< / ><>1.22< / ><>93.75< / ><>129.13< / >< / ><><>辛塔斯 (Cintas)< / ><>197.19< / ><>1.23< / ><>219.16< / ><>161.16< / ><>1.05< / ><>39.68< / ><>79.01< / >< / ><><>思科系统 (Cisco Systems)< / ><>117.39< / ><>-0.55< / ><>130.37< / ><>66.81< / ><>1.43< / ><>34.94< / ><>462.82< / >< / ><><>花旗集团 (Citigroup)< / ><>127.32< / ><>-1.20< / ><>147.96< / ><>93.66< / ><>2.10< / ><>17.91< / ><>213.57< / >< / ><><>Cloudflare Inc

A< / ><>342.97< / ><>-12.04< / ><>370.35< / ><>158.83< / ><>0.00< / ><>591.33< / ><>110.65< / >< / ><><>芝商所集团 A (CME Group A)< / ><>270.27< / ><>0.09< / ><>329.16< / ><>218.31< / ><>4.18< / ><>22.81< / ><>97.18< / >< / ><><>认知科技 A (Cognizant Tech Sci A)< / ><>57.07< / ><>-0.15< / ><>87.03< / ><>37.08< / ><>2.31< / ><>12.19< / ><>25.71< / >< / ><><>Coinbase Global A< / ><>178.45< / ><>-7.29< / ><>402.16< / ><>139.11< / ><>0.00< / ><>46.11< / ><>39.76< / >< / ><><>高露洁-棕榈立顿 (Colgate-Palmolite)< / ><>87.21< / ><>-0.04< / ><>95.33< / ><>74.55< / ><>2.43< / ><>34.33< / ><>69.52< / >< / ><><>康卡斯特 (Comcast

A< / ><>20.94< / ><>-0.62< / ><>32.85< / ><>21.28< / ><>6.30< / ><>6.69< / ><>74.11< / >< / ><><>康菲石油 (ConocoPhillips)< / ><>129.84< / ><>0.49< / ><>141.62< / ><>85.57< / ><>2.59< / ><>17.17< / ><>155.98< / >< / ><><>星座能源 (Constellation Energy)< / ><>298.59< / ><>-0.61< / ><>412.70< / ><>228.63< / ><>0.57< / ><>29.26< / ><>106.15< / >< / ><><>星座软件 (Constellation Srl)< / ><>26.82< / ><>-0.20< / ><>45.89< / ><>28.64< / ><>0.00< / ><>17.06< / ><>24.69< / >< / ><><>康宁 (Corning)< / ><>163.25< / ><>-5.72< / ><>271.78< / ><>77.39< / ><>0.69< / ><>73.54< / ><>140.62< / >< / ><><>科迪华 (Corteva)< / ><>14.45< / ><>0.54< / ><>90.97< / ><>11.74< / ><>4.98< / ><>8.76< / ><>9.64< / >< / ><><>开市客 (Costco

Wholesale)< / ><>942.25< / ><>6.57< / ><>1086.50< / ><>844.06< / ><>0.62< / ><>47.33< / ><>417.67< / >< / ><><>Coupang A< / ><>14.81< / ><>0.39< / ><>32.70< / ><>13.35< / ><>0.00< / ><>34.44< / ><>24.28< / >< / ><><>CRH< / ><>81.46< / ><>-2.14< / ><>131.55< / ><>80.13< / ><>1.92< / ><>16.07< / ><>54.19< / >< / ><><>CrowdStrike Holdings A< / ><>265.44< / ><>-13.42< / ><>786.00< / ><>174.14< / ><>0.00< / ><>6636.80< / ><>271.79< / >< / table>

r>< / table>

汇率固定于英国时间上午11点。

债券：十年期政府债券利差

4.02< / ><>0.55< / ><>-1.25< / >< / ><><>法国< / ><>4.78< / ><>1.31< / ><>-0.49< / ><>瑞典< / ><>3.13< / ><>-0.34< / ><>-2.14< / >< / ><><>德国< / ><>3.47< / ><>0.00< / ><>-1.80< / ><>英国< / ><>5.41< / ><>1.94< / ><>0.14< / >< / ><><>爱尔兰< / ><>3.53< / ><>0.06< / ><>-1.74< / ><>美国< / ><>5.27< / ><>1.80< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>

所列价格仅供参考，且在发布时被认为是准确的。ICE 或 FT 未做出任何要约。FT 不保证也不担保信息的可靠性或完整性。FT 不承担且不对因依赖或使用该信息而产生的任何损失负责。如需进一步信息，请联系 newspapers@ice.com

数据由 ICE 提供。www.ice.com

股票< / td><>价格< / ><>涨跌< / ><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / ><>M (p)< / >< / tr><><>ONEOK< / ><>88.05< / ><>-1.18< / ><>90.05< / ><>87.89< / ><>4.86< / ><>15.15< / ><>55.51< / >< / ><><>甲骨文 (Oracle)< / ><>143.56< / ><>-1.21< / ><>322.54< / ><>114.50< / ><>1.39< / ><>22.15< / ><>434.03< / >< / ><><>O’Folsky Automotive< / ><>84.61< / ><>-0.53< / ><>104.06< / ><>82.59< / ><>0.00< / ><>26.78< / ><>68.45< / >< / ><><>Orla Wholesale< / ><>65.72< / ><>-0.16< / ><>107.00< / ><>73.50< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.68< / ><>33.03< / >< / ><><>标准普尔 500 指数 (S&P 500)< / ><>147.82< / ><>-0.19< / ><>167.25< / ><>137.62< / ><>2.95< / ><>21.00< / ><>54.03< / >< / ><><>PACCAR< / ><>106.86< / ><>-2.46< / ><>139.24< / ><>92.25< / ><>1.31< / ><>22.45< / ><>56.25< / >< / ><><>Palantir Technologies A< / ><>194.12< / ><>2.05< / ><>207.52< / ><>106.37< / ><>0.00< / ><>152.85< / ><>446.61< / >< / ><><> Palo Alto Networks< / ><>405.57< / ><>-14.34< / ><>432.32< / ><>139.57< / ><>0.00< / ><>989.20< / ><>331.76< / >< / ><><>Parker-Hannifin< / ><>952.79< / ><>-32.12< / ><>1099.94< / ><>715.37< / ><>0.84< / ><>32.98< / ><>120.16< / >< / ><><>Paychex< / ><>101.55< / ><>0.53< / ><>129.24< / ><>85.45< / ><>4.69< / ><>20.15< / ><>36.15< / >< / ><><>PayPal Holdings< / ><>54.95< / ><>0.34< / ><>79.22< / ><>38.46< / ><>1.02< / ><>10.31< / ><>47.01< / >< / ><><>百事公司 (PepsiCo)< / ><>123.73< / ><>-1.98< / ><>171.48< / ><>124.22< / ><>4.78< / ><>16.20< / ><>168.88< / >< / ><><>辉瑞 (Pfizer)< / ><>28.00< / ><>0.50< / ><>29.21< / ><>23.62< / ><>6.14< / ><>36.36< / ><>159.59< / >< / ><><>菲利普莫里斯国际 (Philip Morris Intl)< / ><>192.69< / ><>2.29< / ><>207.76< / ><>142.11< / ><>3.32< / ><>27.69< / ><>300.33< / >< / ><><>Phillips 66< / ><>271.62< / ><>1.83< / ><>277.12< / ><>126.74< / ><>1.87< / ><>15.45< / ><>108.38< / >< / ><><>PNC Financial Services Gp< / ><>217.72< / ><>-2.44< / ><>258.96< / ><>176.88< / ><>3.67< / ><>11.98< / ><>86.86< / >< / ><><>Progressive< / ><>214.12< / ><>2.07< / ><>245.64< / ><>189.20< / ><>0.19< / ><>10.72< / ><>124.43< / >< / ><><>Prologis Inc< / ><>127.30< / ><>-1.38< / ><>153.35< / ><>111.03< / ><>3.36< / ><>28.16< / ><>120.98< / >< / ><><>Prudential Financial< / ><>112.36< / ><>-1.18< / ><>127.72< / ><>91.89< / ><>4.98< / ><>10.13< / ><>38.76< / >< / ><><>Public Storage< / ><>281.99< / ><>-3.86< / ><>335.55< / ><>256.54< / ><>4.26< / ><>26.81< / ><>52.69< / >< / ><><>高通 (QUALCOMM)< / ><>177.11< / ><>-1.00< / ><>200.00< / ><>147.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.00< / ><>100.00< / >< / ><><>Qualcomm Income< / ><>53.35< / ><>-0.98< / ><>67.94< / ><>53.33< / ><>6.11< / ><>38.94< / ><>50.48< / >< / ><><>再生元制药 (Regeneron Pharma)< / ><>742.12< / ><>3.40< / ><>859.34< / ><>541.00< / ><>0.51< / ><>17.72< / ><>75.06< / >< / ><><>Republic Services< / ><>216.18< / ><>1.44< / ><>233.42< / ><>196.41< / ><>1.24< / ><>30.62< / ><>66.20< / >< / ><><>Robinhood Markets A< / ><>109.51< / ><>-2.49< / ><>153.56< / ><>63.52< / ><>0.00< / ><>47.41< / ><>86.58< / >< / ><><>Rubisco A< / ><>46.41< / ><>0.85< / ><>141.95< / ><>33.88< / ><>0.00< / ><>32.91< / ><>31.09< / >< / ><><>Roper Technologies< / ><>358.57< / ><>-3.71< / ><>521.28< / ><>305.96< / ><>1.02< / ><>14.88< / ><>35.46< / >< / ><><>Ross< / >< / table>

iceNow< / td> 137.87< / ><>-0.10< / ><>864.83< / ><>81.24< / ><>0.00< / ><>81.58< / ><>142.56< / >< / tr> <>Simon Property Group< / ><>197.59< / ><>-4.15< / ><>238.50< / ><>172.19< / ><>4.55< / ><>13.94< / ><>63.83< / >< / ><><>Snowflake A< / ><>332.85< / ><>-3.10< / ><>394.56< / ><>118.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>108.07< / ><>117.43< / >< / ><><>Shore Enerplus< / ><>60.97< / ><>-0.97< / ><>90.08< / ><>59.46< / ><>0.96< / ><>16.78< / ><>108.36< / >< / ><><>Sherwin Co< / ><>85.44< / ><>< / ><>1003.83< / ><>81.69< / ><>3.56< / ><>20.49< / ><>98.29< / >< / ><><>Southern Copper< / ><>200.57< / ><>-3.69< / ><>223.88< / ><>119.25< / ><>1.97< / ><>30.12< / ><>169.35< / >< / ><><>Spotify

Technology< / ><>512.92< / ><>24.79< / ><>700.12< / ><>405.00< / ><>0.00< / ><>230.01< / ><>105.60< / >< / ><><>Starbucks Corp< / ><>93.58< / ><>-2.53< / ><>110.51< / ><>77.99< / ><>2.65< / ><>54.09< / ><>106.68< / >< / ><><>Strategy A< / ><>153.37< / ><>-11.18< / ><>359.44< / ><>81.81< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.55< / ><>55.92< / >< / ><><>Stryker< / ><>275.40< / ><>-2.80< / ><>392.55< / ><>267.00< / ><>1.28< / ><>28.30< / ><>105.64< / >< / ><><>Synopsys< / ><>502.67< / ><>-2.50< / ><>539.48< / ><>362.55< / ><>0.00< / ><>87.12< / ><>96.33< / >< / ><><>Targa Resources< / ><>283.96< / ><>-1.76< / ><>307.94< / ><>144.14< / ><>1.76< / ><>27.07< / ><>60.89< / >< / ><><>Target< / ><>150.92< / ><>-3.41< / ><>170.75< / ><>83.44< / ><>3.07< / ><>15.59< / ><>68.56< / >< / ><><>TE

Connectivity< / ><>215.83< / ><>-3.68< / ><>252.56< / ><>190.27< / ><>1.45< / ><>21.00< / ><>62.49< / >< / ><><>Tesla< / ><>377.81< / ><>-2.87< / ><>498.83< / ><>297.38< / ><>0.00< / ><>320.18< / ><>1482.18< / >< / ><><>Texas Instruments< / ><>286.98< / ><>-8.25< / ><>334.03< / ><>152.73< / ><>2.10< / ><>43.72< / ><>263.91< / >< / ><><>The Altstate< / ><>223.95< / ><>-0.32< / ><>277.22< / ><>188.08< / ><>1.93< / ><>4.43< / ><>56.63< / >< / ><><>The Charles Schwab< / ><>95.58< / ><>-1.22< / ><>114.53< / ><>83.96< / ><>1.34< / ><>17.32< / ><>165.29< / >< / ><><>The Cigna Group< / ><>278.51< / ><>4.14< / ><>312.18< / ><>238.51< / ><>2.24< / ><>11.73< / ><>73.59< / >< / ><><>The

Coca-Cola< / ><>85.82< / ><>-0.35< / ><>92.49< / ><>65.87< / ><>2.47< / ><>25.77< / ><>369.24< / >< / ><><>The Enghouse< / ><>45.77< / ><>-0.21< / ><>54.35< / ><>40.90< / ><>1.83< / ><>11.92< / ><>149.35< / >< / ><><>Thermo Fisher's< / ><>315.00< / ><>-6.19< / ><>377.77< / ><>289.86< / ><>1.02< / ><>28.79< / ><>76.47< / >< / ><><>The TJX Cos< / ><>138.80< / ><>1.77< / ><>170.00< / ><>122.78< / ><>1.38< / ><>25.37< / ><>152.68< / >< / ><><>The Williams Cos< / ><>71.46< / ><>-0.93< / ><>80.08< / ><>56.19< / ><>2.94< / ><>28.47< / ><>87.41< / >< / ><><>Thermo Fisher Scientific< / ><>662.06< / ><>5.48< / ><>694.33< / ><>435.27< / ><>0.28< / ><>35.58< / ><>244.79< / >< / ><><>T-Mobile

US< / td> 167.65< / ><>1.72< / ><>231.02< / ><>160.81< / ><>2.52< / ><>17.50< / ><>179.83< / >< / tr> <>Trade Systems< / ><>467.27< / ><>-9.12< / ><>505.87< / ><>348.06< / ><>0.90< / ><>35.43< / ><>102.81< / >< / ><><>TransDigm Group< / ><>1096.21< / ><>-7.12< / ><>1463.03< / ><>1071.25< / ><>0.00< / ><>33.25< / ><>60.59< / >< / ><><>Travelers< / ><>360.61< / ><>-0.03< / ><>398.69< / ><>252.26< / ><>1.39< / ><>9.55< / ><>75.21< / >< / ><><>Truist Financial< / ><>45.58< / ><>-0.67< / ><>56.20< / ><>40.78< / ><>4.56< / ><>10.34< / ><>55.68< / >< / ><><>Uber Technologies< / ><>68.45< / ><>-0.63< / ><>100.69< / ><>65.41< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.82< / ><>139.81< / >< / ><><>Union

Pacific< / ><>274.68< / ><>-1.93< / ><>315.99< / ><>215.53< / ><>2.07< / ><>22.89< / ><>163.18< / >< / ><><>United Parcel Service B< / ><>92.29< / ><>-0.82< / ><>122.41< / ><>82.00< / ><>7.11< / ><>17.15< / ><>68.16< / >< / ><><>United Rentals< / ><>1037.44< / ><>-43.18< / ><>1179.18< / ><>701.59< / ><>0.74< / ><>24.90< / ><>64.57< / >< / ><><>UnitedHealth Group< / ><>375.98< / ><>-0.34< / ><>461.62< / ><>255.97< / ><>2.47< / ><>24.10< / ><>337.48< / >< / ><><>US Bancorp< / ><>56.17< / ><>-1.12< / ><>66.08< / ><>45.02< / ><>3.85< / ><>11.21< / ><>87.52< / >< / ><><>Valero Energy< / ><>424.10< / ><>4.88< / ><>422.99< / ><>155.29< / ><>1.13< / ><>17.68< / ><>122.11< / >< / ><><>Verizon

Communications< / ><>45.77< / ><>-0.21< / ><>57.74< / ><>43.90< / ><>6.18< / ><>11.92< / ><>138.18< / >< / ><><>Vermilion Media Group A< / ><>31.44< / ><>-0.03< / ><>59.00< / ><>27.17< / ><>4.77< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.36< / >< / ><><>Vertex Pharmaceuticals< / ><>505.64< / ><>3.33< / ><>560.25< / ><>400.86< / ><>0.00< / ><>29.21< / ><>128.16< / >< / ><><>Visa A< / ><>372.10< / ><>1.46< / ><>385.57< / ><>293.89< / ><>0.72< / ><>31.61< / ><>634.10< / >< / ><><>Voltra< / ><>166.72< / ><>6.22< / ><>217.10< / ><>132.66< / ><>0.55< / ><>27.79< / ><>55.96< / >< / ><><>Walmart< / ><>108.16< / ><>0.96< / ><>135.16< / ><>98.88< / ><>3.92< / ><>30.05< / ><>858.11< / >< / ><><>Walt

Disney< / ><>104.75< / ><>0.72< / ><>117.09< / ><>92.19< / ><>1.43< / ><>21.51< / ><>180.87< / >< / ><><>Waste Management< / ><>208.94< / ><>1.06< / ><>248.13< / ><>194.11< / ><>1.81< / ><>29.51< / ><>83.52< / >< / ><><>Wells Fargo< / ><>80.26< / ><>-1.25< / ><>97.76< / ><>72.78< / ><>2.49< / ><>11.53< / ><>242.71< / >< / ><><>Welltower< / ><>221.12< / ><>-4.66< / ><>255.20< / ><>163.75< / ><>1.54< / ><>96.14< / ><>159.37< / >< / ><><>Workday A< / ><>184.26< / ><>-2.29< / ><>247.40< / ><>110.36< / ><>0.00< / ><>37.45< / ><>36.11< / >< / ><><>WW Grainger< / ><>1263.51< / ><>-12.05< / ><>1419.91< / ><>906.52< / ><>0.79< / ><>32.16< / ><>59.51< / >< / ><><>Yum

Brands< / ><>140.35< / ><>0.51< / ><>170.14< / ><>134.26< / ><>2.14< / ><>17.57< / ><>38.30< / >< / ><><>Zscelta A< / ><>71.55< / ><>0.22< / ><>148.30< / ><>68.77< / ><>2.96< / ><>11.67< / ><>29.57< / >< / table>

请参阅 FTSE 网站了解更多详情 www.ftse.com / products / indices / gilts。 © 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC。保留所有权利。本文件中包含的 Tradeweb FTSE Gilt 收盘价信息为 Tradeweb 的专有财产；不得复制或重新分发；不保证其准确性、完整性或及时性；且不构成投资建议。Tradeweb 对因使用此信息而可能导致的任何损失或损害不承担责任。

债券：全球投资级

贵金属< / td>< / tr><><>黄金< / ><>4111.46< / ><>5.00< / >< / ><><>白银 ($)< / ><>58.76< / ><>-1.14< / >< / ><><>铂金< / ><>1627.86< / ><>-1.94< / >< / ><><>钯金< / ><>1120.63< / ><>4.16< / >< / ><><>铁矿石< / ><>90.85< / ><>-0.17< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="3">大宗商品< / >< / ><><>波罗的海干散货指数< / ><>2973.00< / ><>-21.00< / >< / ><><>Richards ICE 期货< / ><>127.10< / ><>-0.20< / >< / table>

<><>能源< / ><>价格< / ><>涨跌< / >< / ><><>布伦特原油< / ><>105.74< / ><>4.91< / >< / ><><>天然气< / ><>3.14< / ><>-0.06< / >< / ><><>轻质原油< / ><>92.87< / ><>4.59< / >< / ><><>3.5 燃料油< / ><>572.32< / ><>3.11< / >< / ><><>欧洲石脑油< / ><>867.17< / ><>6.26< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="3">基本金属< / >< / ><><>铝< / ><>3045.00< / ><>-72.00< / >< / ><><>铜< / ><>14301.00< / ><>-174.50< / >< / ><><>铅< / ><>1861.50< / ><>-35.00< / >< / ><><>镍< / ><>15555.00< / ><>-180.00< / >< / ><><>锡< / ><>51315.00< / ><>-2964.00< / >< / ><><>锌< / ><>3709.00< / ><>-54.50< / >< / table>

波动率指数 数据来源：能源：NYMEX。基本金属：LME / 伦敦金属交易所。玉米、小麦、大豆：CBOT。活牛、肥牛、精瘦猪：CME。

Tradeweb

<><>农业< / ><>价格< / ><>涨跌< / >< / ><><>玉米< / ><>498.75< / ><>-3.25< / >< / ><><>小麦< / ><>208.50< / ><>-1.00< / >< / ><><>油菜籽< / ><>507.00< / ><>0.75< / >< / ><><>向日葵籽< / ><>10250.00< / ><>100.00< / >< / ><><>大豆< / ><>1287.50< / ><>-10.00< / >< / ><><>豆粕< / ><>359.90< / ><>-6.00< / >< / ><><>可可 (ICE Liffe)< / ><>4174.00< / ><>-57.00< / >< / ><><>可可 (ICE US)< / ><>5652.00< / ><>70.00< / >< / ><><>咖啡 (罗布斯塔)< / ><>3455.00< / ><>-104.00< / >< / ><><>咖啡 (阿拉比卡)< / ><>356.25< / ><>-4.85< / >< / ><><>白糖< / ><>555.70< / ><>-0.80< / >< / ><><>糖 #11< / ><>20.32< / ><>-0.51< / >< / ><><>棉花< / ><>76.30< / ><>-1.18< / >< / ><><>橙汁< / ><>147.25< / ><>0.70< / >< / ><><>枫叶糖浆< / ><>4084.23< / ><>1.14< / >< / ><><>活牛< / ><>220.70< / ><>-0.90< / >< / ><><>肥牛< / ><>336.40< / ><>-1.75< / >< / ><><>精瘦猪< / ><>76.23< / ><>-0.70< / >< / ><><>棕榈油 (马来西亚)< / ><>1147.50< / ><>25.00< / >< / table>

<><>< / ><>到期日< / ><>票息< / ><>买入价< / ><>买入收益率< / ><>当日< / ><>当周< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">美元< / >< / ><><>摩根士丹利< / ><>30 / 01< / ><>4.00< / ><>97.49< / ><>4.57< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.17< / >< / ><><>Trust Finl Corp< / ><>28 / 06< / ><>4.12< / ><>99.42< / ><>5.12< / ><>0.04< / ><>0.10< / >< / ><><>National Rural< / ><>32 / 11< / ><>4.02< / ><>91.49< / ><>5.27< / ><>0.52< / ><>0.06< / >< / ><><>Washington Gaslight Co< / ><>36 / 03< / ><>5.78< / ><>97.97< / ><>5.02< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Northern States Power< / ><>28 / 03< / ><>8.13< / ><>100.66< / ><>5.05< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Oklahoma Gas & Elec< / ><>28 / 04< / ><>6.50< / ><>101.12< / ><>4.58< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.09< / >< / ><><

colspan="7">欧元< / td>< / tr> 德国< / ><>25 / 08< / ><>2.22< / ><>88.65< / ><>3.19< / ><>-0.15< / ><>0.13< / >< / ><><>西班牙< / ><>46 / 10< / ><>2.88< / ><>78.95< / ><>4.50< / ><>0.04< / ><>0.16< / >< / ><><>比利时< / ><>47 / 06< / ><>1.50< / ><>57.46< / ><>4.92< / ><>-0.15< / ><>0.58< / >< / ><><>法国< / ><>48 / 05< / ><>2.00< / ><>57.87< / ><>5.32< / ><>-0.22< / ><>0.79< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">英镑< / >< / ><><>英国< / ><>46 / 12< / ><>4.25< / ><>80.21< / ><>5.95< / ><>-0.25< / >< / ><><>英国< / ><>47 / 07< / ><>1.50< / ><>46.95< / ><>6.00< / ><>-0.13< / >< / table>

债券：基准政府债券

<><>< / ><>10月08日< / ><>当日涨跌< / ><>前值< / ><>52周最高< / ><>52周最低< / >< / ><><>VIX< / ><>15.54< / ><>0.46< / ><>15.08< / ><>35.30< / ><>13.38< / >< / ><><>VXD< / ><>15.97< / ><>0.50< / ><>15.47< / ><>42.71< / ><>2.43< / >< / ><><>VDAX< / ><>19.36< / ><>0.75< / ><>18.61< / ><>35.58< / ><>13.53< / >< / table>

<><>< / ><>赎回日期< / ><>票面利率< / ><>买入价< / ><>买入收益率< / ><>当日收益率涨跌< / ><>每周收益率涨跌< / ><>每月收益率涨跌< / ><>年度收益率涨跌< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">澳大利亚< / ><>06 / 54< / ><>4.75< / ><>84.60< / ><>5.88< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.20< / ><>0.64< / >< / ><><>04 / 27< / ><>4.75< / ><>99.95< / ><>4.85< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.09< / ><>1.48< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">奥地利< / ><>02 / 33< / ><>2.88< / ><>96.35< / ><>3.55< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.02< / ><>0.19< / ><>0.67< / >< / ><><>10 / 53< / ><>3.13< / ><>84.73< / ><>4.09< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.08< / ><>0.27< / >< / ><><>比利时< / ><>06 / 54< / ><>3.25< / ><>74.91< / ><>4.99< / ><>0.01< / ><>-0.09< / ><>0.28< / ><>0.70< / >< / ><><

rowspan="2">加拿大< / ><>06 / 27< / ><>1.00< / ><>98.95< / ><>2.82< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.03< / ><>-0.18< / >< / ><><>12 / 55< / ><>2.75< / ><>73.88< / ><>3.93< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.13< / ><>0.15< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">丹麦< / ><>11 / 33< / ><>2.25< / ><>94.00< / ><>2.78< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.20< / >< / ><><>11 / 39< / ><>4.50< / ><>110.97< / ><>3.44< / ><>-0.01< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.12< / ><>0.51< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">芬兰< / ><>09 / 27< / ><>0.50< / ><>97.76< / ><>2.97< / ><>0.05< / ><>0.02< / ><>0.06< / ><>0.83< / >< / ><><>09 / 33< / ><>3.00< / ><>95.85< / ><>3.67< / ><>0.04< / ><>0.22< / ><>0.69< / >< / ><><

rowspan="2">法国< / ><>05 / 54< / ><>3.00< / ><>66.16< / ><>5.37< / ><>0.02< / ><>-0.11< / ><>0.44< / ><>0.53< / >< / ><><>11 / 33< / ><>3.50< / ><>93.76< / ><>4.54< / ><>0.05< / ><>-0.02< / ><>-0.91< / ><>-0.32< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">德国< / ><>08 / 33< / ><>2.60< / ><>95.43< / ><>3.35< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.14< / ><>0.65< / >< / ><><>08 / 53< / ><>1.75< / ><>65.59< / ><>3.89< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.07< / ><>0.40< / >< / ><><

rowspan="2">希腊< / ><>06 / 28< / ><>3.88< / ><>100.90< / ><>3.31< / ><>0.01< / ><>-0.14< / ><>0.23< / ><>0.87< / >< / ><><>06 / 33< / ><>4.25< / ><>100.15< / ><>4.22< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.78< / ><>0.43< / ><>0.94< / >< / ><><>爱尔兰< / ><>10 / 32< / ><>0.35< / ><>80.69< / ><>4.03< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.39< / ><>1.05< / ><>1.40< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">意大利< / ><>12 / 27< / ><>2.63< / ><>99.27< / ><>3.26< / ><>0.02< / ><>-0.11< / ><>0.23< / ><>1.01< / >< / ><><>03 / 34< / ><>4.13< / ><>99.07< / ><>4.36< / ><>-0.01< / ><>-0.09< / ><>0.43< / ><>1.05< / >< / ><><

rowspan="2">荷兰< / td> 01 / 54< / ><>2.00< / ><>68.65< / ><>3.88< / ><>0.01< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.05< / ><>0.30< / >< / tr> <>07 / 33< / ><>2.50< / ><>94.30< / ><>3.46< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.02< / ><>0.18< / ><>0.66< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">波兰< / ><>04 / 28< / ><>2.75< / ><>97.30< / ><>4.61< / ><>0.04< / ><>-0.10< / ><>0.25< / ><>0.76< / >< / ><><>10 / 33< / ><>6.00< / ><>99.45< / ><>6.10< / ><>0.02< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.22< / ><>1.16< / >< / ><><>葡萄牙< / ><>07 / 32< / ><>1.63< / ><>89.79< / ><>3.62< / ><>0.02< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.30< / ><>0.84< / >< / ><><

rowspan="2">西班牙< / ><>10 / 52< / ><>1.88< / ><>59.60< / ><>4.58< / ><>-0.01< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.20< / ><>0.54< / >< / ><><>10 / 33< / ><>3.50< / ><>98.23< / ><>3.83< / ><>0.01< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.31< / ><>0.78< / >< / ><><>瑞典< / ><>11 / 33< / ><>1.75< / ><>96.30< / ><>2.50< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.14< / >< / ><><>瑞士< / ><>03 / 36< / ><>2.50< / ><>117.67< / ><>0.32< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.02< / ><>-0.22< / ><>-0.92< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">英国< / ><>06 / 28< / ><>0.00< / ><>92.56< / ><>4.75< / ><>0.06< / ><>0.05< / ><>0.26< / ><>0.98< / >< / ><><>10 / 53< / ><>3.75< / ><>69.91< / ><>6.02< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.05< / ><>0.19< / ><>0.80< / >< / ><>< rowspan="2">美国< / ><>11 / 33< / ><>4.50< / ><>95.92< / ><>5.19< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.05< / ><>0.50< / ><>1.22< / >< / ><><>11 / 53< / ><>4.75< / ><>86.93< / ><>5.70< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.04< / ><>0.42< / ><>0.87< / >< / table>

英国国债（GILTS）：英国现金市场

<><>10月08日< / ><>价格< / ><>收益率< / ><>赎回收益率< / ><>当日< / ><>当周< / ><>最高< / ><>最低< / >< / ><><> 1.25% '27< / ><>97.60< / ><>1.28< / ><>4.43< / ><>-0.03< / ><>97.71< / ><>95.53< / >< / ><><> 0.875% '29< / ><>88.86< / ><>0.98< / ><>4.86< / ><>-0.17< / ><>-0.27< / ><>91.00< / ><>0.01< / >< / ><><> 1% '32< / ><>81.23< / ><>1.23< / ><>5.08< / ><>-0.21< / ><>-0.31< / ><>85.07< / ><>81.01< / >< / ><><> 4.25% '36< / ><>91.37< / ><>4.65< / ><>5.43< / ><>-0.30< / ><>-0.58< / ><>99.39< / ><>91.15< / >< / ><><> 4.5% '42< / ><>86.05< / ><>5.23< / ><>5.85< / ><>-0.30< / ><>-0.63< / ><>96.45< / ><>85.71< / >< / ><><> 3.75% '52< / ><>70.76< / ><>5.30< / ><>5.99< / ><>-0.22< / ><>-0.52< / ><>81.50< / ><>70.51< / >< / ><><> 4% '60< / ><>71.92< / ><>5.56< / ><>5.95< / ><>-0.23< / ><>-0.53< / ><>83.52< / ><>71.62< / >< / table>

收盘价、最高价和最低价以交易货币计价。市值以当地货币计价。最高价和最低价基于滚动52周周期。

英国国债（GILTS）：英国富时精算师指数

<><>价格指数（固定票息）< / ><>10月8日< / ><>当日变动%< / ><>总回报< / ><>月回报< / ><>年回报< / ><>收益率< / >< / ><><>5年以下< / ><>84.41< / ><>-0.12< / ><>2650.55< / ><>-0.33< / ><>0.83< / ><>4.85< / >< / ><><>5-10年< / ><>140.95< / ><>-0.27< / ><>3336.96< / ><>-1.69< / ><>-2.32< / ><>5.29< / >< / ><><>10-15年< / ><>138.44< / ><>-0.32< / ><>3639.29< / ><>-2.35< / ><>-4.30< / ><>5.67< / >< / ><><>5-15年< / ><>138.60< / ><>-0.29< / ><>3400.30< / ><>-1.89< / ><>-2.93< / ><>5.44< / >< / ><><>15年以上< / ><>160.60< / ><>-0.31< / ><>3205.37< / ><>-2.56< / ><>-7.88< / ><>5.93< / >< / ><><>所有债券< / ><>123.33< / ><>-0.23< / ><>3090.12< / ><>-1.44< / ><>-2.75< / ><>5.62< / >< / table>

指数挂钩< / td><>10月 8< / ><>当日涨跌幅 %< / ><>当月涨跌幅 %< / ><>年度涨跌幅 %< / ><>总回报< / ><>1 个月回报< / ><>1 年回报< / >< / tr><><>5 年及以下< / ><>365.14< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.16< / ><>2.79< / ><>3186.58< / ><>0.18< / ><>3.62< / >< / ><><>5 年以上< / ><>462.69< / ><>0.14< / ><>-1.81< / ><>-3.25< / ><>3628.09< / ><>-1.63< / ><>-2.65< / >< / ><><>5-15 年< / ><>454.18< / ><>-0.02< / ><>-1.49< / ><>0.29< / ><>3816.78< / ><>-1.29< / ><>1.04< / >< / ><><>15 年以上< / ><>459.28< / ><>0.32< / ><>-2.15< / ><>-6.64< / ><>3469.29< / ><>-1.99< / ><>-6.17< / >< / ><><>所有股票< / ><>462.26< / ><>0.11< / ><>-1.37< / ><>-2.02< / ><>3699.58< / ><>-1.22< / ><>-1.38< / >< / table>

<><>收益率指数< / ><>10月 8< / ><>10月 7< / ><>一年前< / >< / ><><>5 年期< / ><>5.04< / ><>4.99< / ><>4.26< / >< / ><><>10 年期< / ><>5.47< / ><>5.43< / ><>4.59< / >< / ><><>15 年期< / ><>5.76< / ><>5.73< / ><>4.88< / >< / ><><>20 年期< / ><>5.91< / ><>5.88< / ><>5.02< / >< / ><><>45 年期< / ><>5.75< / ><>5.73< / ><>4.91< / >< / table>

<><>实际收益率（0%通胀）< / ><>10月 8< / ><>久期（年）< / ><>前值< / ><>一年前< / >< / ><><>5 年及以下< / ><>1.04< / ><>2.60< / ><>1.05< / ><>0.73< / >< / ><><>5 年以上< / ><>2.42< / ><>16.10< / ><>2.43< / ><>1.90< / >< / ><><>5-15 年< / ><>2.14< / ><>9.43< / ><>2.14< / ><>1.61< / >< / ><><>15 年以上< / ><>2.54< / ><>22.88< / ><>2.56< / ><>2.01< / >< / ><><>所有股票< / ><>2.36< / ><>13.20< / ><>2.37< / ><>1.86< / >< / table>

<><>实际收益率（5%通胀）< / ><>10月 8< / ><>久期（年）< / ><>前值< / ><>一年前< / >< / ><><>5 年及以下< / ><>0.81< / ><>2.60< / ><>0.81< / ><>0.43< / >< / ><><>5 年以上< / ><>2.40< / ><>16.10< / ><>2.40< / ><>1.88< / >< / ><><>5-15 年< / ><>2.09< / ><>9.43< / ><>2.08< / ><>1.54< / >< / ><><>15 年以上< / ><>2.53< / ><>22.88< / ><>2.54< / ><>2.00< / >< / ><><>所有股票< / ><>2.33< / ><>13.20< / ><>2.33< / ><>1.82< / >< / table>

FT

FINANCIAL TIMES

能源来源

利润。权力。政治。

Ground Truth 图像显示了一条长且实心的水平线，这是一个风格化或背景元素（类似于纸上的标尺线）。根据规则 2，此类线条必须在 OCR 结果中被忽略。提供的 OCR 内容为 ""，不包含任何字符。由于 OCR 输出正确地忽略了该风格化线条，因此符合规则 2。因此，OCR 结果与 Ground Truth 一致。

工业综合< / td>< / tr><><>Coats Group< / ><>81.70< / ><>0.70< / ><>98.10< / ><>73.15< / ><>3.08< / ><>18.28< / ><>3469.44< / >< / ><><>Macfarlane◆< / ><>83.00< / ><>-1.40< / ><>93.80< / ><>59.80< / ><>4.41< / ><>20.80< / ><>118.67< / >< / ><><>Smiths< / ><>2710.00< / ><>-52.00< / ><>2885.00< / ><>2088.00< / ><>1.79< / ><>4.31< / ><>1451.35< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">工业运输< / >< / table>

主市场

< / td>< rowspan="2" colspan="2">价格 + / - 日变动< / >< colspan="2">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">市盈率< / >< ="2">成交量(千股)< / >< / tr><><>最高< / ><>最低< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">航空航天与国防< / >< / ><><>BAE Systems■< / ><>1836.50< / ><>10.50< / ><>2360.00< / ><>1529.00< / ><>2.06< / ><>26.69< / ><>3762.72< / >< / ><><>Chemring Group< / ><>499.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>650.75< / ><>446.52< / ><>1.62< / ><>28.03< / ><>1079.96< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">汽车与零部件< / >< / ><><>Ford Motors< / ><>916.34< / ><>-0.52< / ><>1319.04< / ><>841.76< / ><>4.95< / ><>-5.09< / ><>-< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">银行< / >< / ><><>ANZ Group< / ><>1966.68< / ><>-32.16< / ><>2126.50< / ><>1753.25< / ><>5.82< / ><>19.19< / ><>4951.99< / >< / ><><>Banco Santander< / ><>1012.00< / ><>-22.00< / ><>1122.00< / ><>709.00< / ><>1.71< / ><>13.12< / ><>8926.92< / >< / ><><>Bank of Nova Scotia▲< / ><>6646.30< / ><>47.41< / ><>7165.88< / ><>4711.98< / ><>3.65< / ><>-< / ><>6689.95< / >< / ><><>Barclays■< / ><>426.15< / ><>-5.90< / ><>554.10< / ><>353.55< / ><>2.70< / ><>9.73< / ><>39560.45< / >< / ><><>Canadian Imperial▲< / ><>8210.63< / ><>4.10< / ><>9198.88< / ><>5969.15< / ><>2.77< / ><>-< / ><>370.40< / >< / ><><>HSBC■< / ><>1380.60< / ><>-27.40< / ><>1610.00< / ><>959.29< / ><>4.03< / ><>15.09< / ><>24504.66< / >< / ><><>Lion Finance Gp< / ><>12370.00< / ><>-460.00< / ><>14820.00< / ><>7320.00< / ><>2.56< / ><>8.44< / ><>73.20< / >< / ><><>Lloyds Bnkg Gp■< / ><>100.60< / ><>-1.70< / ><>117.90< / ><>81.82< / ><>3.99< / ><>14.37< / ><>234134.30< / >< / ><><>NatWest Group< / ><>639.80< / ><>-10.00< / ><>726.00< / ><>504.41< / ><>5.47< / ><>11.96< / ><>32736.56< / >< / ><><>OSB Group< / ><>473.60< / ><>-11.80< / ><>647.50< / ><>472.00< / ><>7.58< / ><>6.26< / ><>1011.54< / >< / ><><>Perm TSB Group< / ><>249.55< / ><>-1.53< / ><>291.66< / ><>182.42< / ><>0.62< / ><>6.49< / ><>1152.63< / >< / ><><>Royal Bank of CA< / ><>14438.20< / ><>-46.54< / ><>16187.03< / ><>10784.89< / ><>2.59< / ><>-< / ><>854.55< / >< / ><><>Stand Chart< / ><>2108.00< / ><>-43.00< / ><>2364.00< / ><>1351.50< / ><>2.44< / ><>14.27< / ><>5023.87< / >< / ><><>...7.375%Pl< / ><>107.50< / ><>-0.25< / ><>128.84< / ><>102.00< / ><>6.86< / ><>-< / ><>76.74< / >< / ><><>...8.25%Pl< / ><>118.75< / ><>-< / ><>143.80< / ><>114.25< / ><>6.95< / ><>-< / ><>159.55< / >< / ><><>Toronto-Dominion< / ><>8625.10< / ><>1.26< / ><>9256.88< / ><>5880.62< / ><>2.71< / ><>-< / ><>5267.53< / >< / ><><>Westpack< / ><>1774.54< / ><>-28.89< / ><>2275.39< / ><>1755.74< / ><>4.57< / ><>16.78< / ><>3773.69< / >< / table>

<><>Elementis< / ><>178.80< / ><>-1.40< / ><>195.40< / ><>136.00< / ><>1.86< / ><>-30.32< / ><>709.35< / >< / ><><>Johnson Matthey< / ><>2446.00< / ><>34.00< / ><>3245.25< / ><>2192.00< / ><>4.20< / ><>-32.07< / ><>278.30< / >< / ><><>Victrex< / ><>924.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>1024.00< / ><>515.00< / ><>3.25< / ><>28.88< / ><>96.41< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">建筑与材料< / >< / table>

[...OMITTED...]

Galliford Try Hldgs< / td><>682.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>726.81< / ><>466.00< / ><>3.45< / ><>16.35< / ><>217.46< / >< / tr><><>Morgan Sindell*< / ><>4068.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>5730.00< / ><>3938.00< / ><>4.01< / ><>10.93< / ><>64.62< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">电子与电气设备< / >< / ><><>discoverGrp< / ><>848.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>900.00< / ><>505.00< / ><>1.53< / ><>28.08< / ><>256.68< / >< / ><><>Halma< / ><>3500.00< / ><>22.00< / ><>4902.00< / ><>3268.00< / ><>0.71< / ><>35.51< / ><>667.23< / >< / ><><>Morgan Adv Mat< / ><>265.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>278.00< / ><>179.80< / ><>4.60< / ><>35.33< / ><>455.34< / >< / ><><>Oxford Instruments< / ><>2926.00< / ><>-122.00< / ><>3318.00< / ><>1682.00< / ><>0.81< / ><>34.59< / ><>140.44< / >< / ><><>Renishaw< / ><>5650.00< / ><>-115.00< / ><>6030.00< / ><>3280.00< / ><>1.45< / ><>34.56< / ><>149.97< / >< / ><><>TT Electronics< / ><>179.00< / ><>-9.40< / ><>197.80< / ><>93.00< / ><>—< / ><>-6.28< / ><>400.76< / >< / ><><>XP Power< / ><>1946.00< / ><>-38.00< / ><>2160.00< / ><>849.23< / ><>—< / ><>-46.33< / ><>65.14< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">综合金融< / >< / ><><>3i Group●< / ><>2352.00< / ><>-39.00< / ><>4497.00< / ><>1825.00< / ><>3.59< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Group< / ><>237.00< / ><>2.60< / ><>265.00< / ><>179.60< / ><>6.16< / ><>10.97< / ><>2685.02< / >< / ><><>Bridgepoint Group●< / ><>382.60< / ><>17.20< / ><>397.11< / ><>212.00< / ><>2.56< / ><>76.52< / ><>3401.39< / >< / ><><>City of London Inv●< / ><>526.00< / ><>14.00< / ><>540.00< / ><>349.00< / ><>6.46< / ><>14.25< / ><>65.95< / >< / ><><>Close Bros< / ><>384.20< / ><>-5.40< / ><>556.15< / ><>318.40< / ><>-< / ><>-6.73< / ><>522.88< / >< / ><><>ICG< / ><>1735.00< / ><>-29.00< / ><>2276.00< / ><>1424.87< / ><>5.01< / ><>10.40< / ><>1459.13< / >< / ><><>Investec< / ><>588.50< / ><>-6.50< / ><>690.00< / ><>499.36< / ><>6.54< / ><>7.63< / ><>1854.25< / >< / ><><>Jupiter< / ><>170.40< / ><>-0.60< / ><>214.50< / ><>137.20< / ><>3.52< / ><>8.88< / ><>881.84< / >< / ><><>Liontrust< / ><>296.50< / ><>-0.50< / ><>358.00< / ><>223.00< / ><>6.41< / ><>19.25< / ><>81.27< / >< / ><><>London Stock Ex●< / ><>8470.00< / ><>154.00< / ><>10140.00< / ><>6884.00< / ><>1.87< / ><>35.53< / ><>752.09< / >< / ><><>Rathbones Group< / ><>1518.00< / ><>-14.00< / ><>2500.00< / ><>1490.00< / ><>6.59< / ><>14.07< / ><>66.76< / >< / ><><>S & U●< / ><>1850.00< / ><>-50.00< / ><>2458.50< / ><>1620.00< / ><>6.27< / ><>9.48< / ><>2.15< / >< / ><><>St James's Place< / ><>1020.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>1575.50< / ><>1011.50< / ><>1.76< / ><>10.21< / ><>1931.78< / >< / ><><>TP ICAP Group●< / ><>322.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>355.00< / ><>235.50< / ><>5.34< / ><>12.78< / ><>112.48< / >< / ><><>Vanquis Banking Gp< / ><>68.70< / ><>0.30< / ><>132.00< / ><>67.00< / ><>-< / ><>21.47< / ><>688.75< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">食品与饮料< / >< / table>

AIM

< / td>< rowspan="2">价格< / >< ="2">当日涨跌< / >< colspan="2">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">市盈率< / >< ="2">成交量 (千股)< / >< / tr><><>最高< / ><>最低< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">航空航天与国防< / >< / ><><>Cohort< / ><>1192.00< / ><>10.00< / ><>1538.00< / ><>881.10< / ><>1.50< / ><>22.82< / ><>108.75< / >< / ><><>Velocity Composites< / ><>16.25< / ><>-< / ><>25.00< / ><>12.00< / ><>-< / ><>-8.12< / ><>50.00< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">基础资源（不含采矿）< / >< / ><><>Cropper J< / ><>670.00< / ><>-15.00< / ><>710.00< / ><>250.00< / ><>-< / ><>21.75< / ><>6.02< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">建筑与材料< / >< / ><><>Accsys

Tech< / ><>55.60< / ><>-1.80< / ><>79.84< / ><>55.00< / ><>-< / ><>24.57< / ><>50.57< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">电子与电气设备< / >< / ><><>Checkit< / ><>16.00< / ><>-0.25< / ><>27.00< / ><>12.35< / ><>-< / ><>-6.15< / ><>41.37< / >< / ><><>LPA< / ><>82.50< / ><>-< / ><>92.00< / ><>34.00< / ><>-< / ><>-31.25< / ><>4.00< / >< / ><><>Thorpe FW< / ><>255.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>320.00< / ><>240.00< / ><>2.88< / ><>10.75< / ><>13.83< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">综合金融< / >< / ><><>Arbuthnot Banking< / ><>790.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>955.00< / ><>755.00< / ><>6.96< / ><>7.24< / ><>6.78< / >< / table>

投资公司

<>< ="2">< / >< ="2">价格< / >< ="2">当日涨跌< / >< colspan="4">52周< / >< ="2">分红 - 溢价< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>净资产值 (NAV)< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">常规投资（不含私募股权）< / >< / ><><>3i Infra< / ><>385.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>399.50< / ><>325.00< / ><>3.49< / ><>405.52< / ><>-4.68< / >< / ><><>Abf GVIT< / ><>92.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>96.77< / ><>76.00< / ><>6.63< / ><>103.46< / ><>-11.61< / >< / ><><>Abf Sml< / ><>1794.00< / ><>-8.00< / ><>1828.00< / ><>1408.07< / ><>2.66< / ><>2012.64< / ><>-10.40< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Asia Foc< / ><>468.00< / ><>-6.00< / ><>478.00< / ><>348.00< / ><>1.38< / ><>518.59< / ><>-9.78< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Asian Inc

Fund< / ><>320.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>357.00< / ><>246.00< / ><>5.87< / ><>347.37< / ><>-7.41< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen Eq Inc< / ><>443.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>473.00< / ><>359.25< / ><>5.21< / ><>443.93< / ><>1.03< / >< / ><><>Aberdeen UK SmlI< / ><>527.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>544.00< / ><>441.50< / ><>2.66< / ><>569.30< / ><>-6.50< / >< / ><><>Alliance Witan< / ><>1397.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>1409.00< / ><>1178.00< / ><>2.10< / ><>1474.98< / ><>-5.00< / >< / ><><>Allianz Tech< / ><>774.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>789.00< / ><>460.75< / ><>—< / ><>846.30< / ><>-7.72< / >< / ><><>Artemis UK Future Lead< / ><>388.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>405.00< / ><>321.00< / ><>3.98< / ><>445.69< / ><>-11.29< / >< / ><><>Aurora UK

Alpha< / ><>245.00< / ><>—< / ><>279.00< / ><>222.09< / ><>1.92< / ><>282.98< / ><>-12.92< / >< / ><><>AVI Japan< / ><>179.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>194.00< / ><>154.50< / ><>1.23< / ><>186.58< / ><>-3.44< / >< / ><><>BG China Growth< / ><>283.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>331.04< / ><>263.00< / ><>0.88< / ><>300.39< / ><>-6.11< / >< / ><><>BG Euro< / ><>121.00< / ><>2.50< / ><>133.00< / ><>91.40< / ><>0.60< / ><>129.88< / ><>-7.58< / >< / ><><>BG Japan< / ><>1066.00< / ><>-16.00< / ><>1114.00< / ><>811.10< / ><>0.94< / ><>1191.25< / ><>-9.29< / >< / ><><>BG Shin< / ><>175.80< / ><>-2.40< / ><>182.00< / ><>123.05< / ><>0.39< / ><>196.50< / ><>-10.01< / >< / ><><>BG US

Growth< / td> 390.50< / ><>-5.50< / ><>398.00< / ><>261.00< / ><>—< / ><>406.05< / ><>-3.05< / >< / tr> <>Baillie Gifford UK< / ><>215.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>231.00< / ><>180.12< / ><>2.88< / ><>237.35< / ><>-10.20< / >< / ><><>Bankers IT< / ><>154.80< / ><>-1.00< / ><>157.80< / ><>125.20< / ><>1.83< / ><>170.17< / ><>-8.22< / >< / ><><>Biotech Growth< / ><>1364.00< / ><>-66.00< / ><>1786.00< / ><>1020.00< / ><>—< / ><>1524.43< / ><>-5.97< / >< / ><><>BlckR Amer Sml< / ><>281.00< / ><>—< / ><>289.55< / ><>208.85< / ><>5.30< / ><>278.39< / ><>1.74< / >< / ><><>BlckR Energy & Res< / ><>174.00< / ><>—< / ><>205.00< / ><>135.50< / ><>3.56< / ><>182.58< / ><>-4.44< / >< / ><><>BlckR

Front< / ><>187.00< / ><>-0.50< / ><>208.00< / ><>164.50< / ><>4.07< / ><>190.25< / ><>0.08< / >< / ><><>BlckR GtEur< / ><>569.00< / ><>-8.00< / ><>625.00< / ><>506.95< / ><>1.26< / ><>621.95< / ><>-7.09< / >< / ><><>BlckR I&G< / ><>238.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>240.00< / ><>208.00< / ><>3.24< / ><>252.27< / ><>-7.56< / >< / ><><>BlckR Smir< / ><>262.50< / ><>-0.50< / ><>288.40< / ><>230.80< / ><>3.02< / ><>307.28< / ><>-14.08< / >< / ><><>BlckR World Mining< / ><>923.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>1076.00< / ><>628.00< / ><>2.60< / ><>955.51< / ><>-3.31< / >< / ><><>Brunner< / ><>1550.00< / ><>-6.00< / ><>1612.00< / ><>1336.00< / ><>1.74< / ><>1722.62< / ><>-9.36< / >< / ><><>Caledonia

Inv< / ><>382.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>402.00< / ><>312.00< / ><>2.01< / ><>595.16< / ><>-34.72< / >< / ><><>CanGen C$< / ><>2731.21< / ><>23.49< / ><>2958.28< / ><>2358.19< / ><>2.41< / ><>87.11< / ><>-42.07< / >< / ><><>City of Lon< / ><>565.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>599.00< / ><>498.00< / ><>3.97< / ><>555.65< / ><>1.97< / >< / ><><>City Natural Res G&I< / ><>404.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>467.00< / ><>258.01< / ><>7.00< / ><>384.96< / ><>-1.50< / >< / ><><>CT Healthcare< / ><>122.00< / ><>-2.60< / ><>152.40< / ><>118.80< / ><>4.32< / ><>128.37< / ><>-4.63< / >< / ><><>CT MgdI< / ><>131.00< / ><>—< / ><>135.00< / ><>115.00< / ><>6.11< / ><>129.08< / ><>0.88< / >< / ><><>CT

MgdG< / ><>327.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>330.00< / ><>280.26< / ><>—< / ><>338.69< / ><>-3.87< / >< / ><><>CT Cp&I< / ><>336.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>373.00< / ><>320.00< / ><>4.00< / ><>352.80< / ><>-4.50< / >< / ><><>CT UK HIT B< / ><>107.00< / ><>—< / ><>120.00< / ><>92.00< / ><>5.57< / ><>112.68< / ><>-6.89< / >< / ><><>CT UK HIT Ord< / ><>106.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>126.00< / ><>97.00< / ><>5.62< / ><>113.20< / ><>-4.56< / >< / ><><>Dunedin Inc< / ><>303.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>323.00< / ><>275.00< / ><>6.65< / ><>329.84< / ><>-8.19< / >< / ><><>Edinburgh Inv< / ><>819.00< / ><>—< / ><>867.00< / ><>737.60< / ><>3.91< / ><>890.08< / ><>-7.82< / >< / ><><>Edin Worldwide< / ><>277.50< / ><>-4.50< / ><>294.50< / ><>194.20< / ><>—< / ><>302.88< / ><>-6.27< / >< / ><><>The

Euro SmlCo< / td> 226.00< / ><>-1.50< / ><>247.21< / ><>193.80< / ><>5.59< / ><>247.92< / ><>-8.27< / >< / tr> <>F&C Inv Trust< / ><>348.40< / ><>0.20< / ><>1332.00< / ><>325.80< / ><>1.21< / ><>382.61< / ><>-9.03< / >< / ><><>Fidelity Asian< / ><>606.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>672.00< / ><>546.06< / ><>3.38< / ><>640.53< / ><>-5.16< / >< / ><><>Fidelity China< / ><>243.50< / ><>-3.00< / ><>339.00< / ><>239.50< / ><>3.70< / ><>264.55< / ><>-7.14< / >< / ><><>Fidelity Emer Mkts< / ><>1504.00< / ><>-26.00< / ><>1574.00< / ><>897.34< / ><>1.66< / ><>1679.50< / ><>-8.48< / >< / ><><>Fidelity Euro< / ><>410.50< / ><>-4.50< / ><>447.50< / ><>367.50< / ><>2.48< / ><>436.98< / ><>-5.03< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">当日涨跌+ / -< / >< colspan="4">52周< / >< rowspan="2">成交量(千股)< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / >< / ><><>AEP Plantations< / ><>196.80< / ><>1.40< / ><>229.00< / ><>124.00< / ><>3.09< / ><>11.25< / ><>248.91< / >< / ><><>Assoc. Brit Foods< / ><>1834.00< / ><>7.00< / ><>2359.00< / ><>1729.45< / ><>3.44< / ><>12.95< / ><>956.48< / >< / ><><>Barr (AG)< / ><>549.00< / ><>-11.00< / ><>715.32< / ><>538.00< / ><>3.48< / ><>12.99< / ><>878.90< / >< / ><><>Fevara< / ><>146.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>152.00< / ><>114.50< / ><>1.64< / ><>6.32< / ><>7.91< / >< / ><><>Coca-Cola

HBC< / ><>4254.00< / ><>6.00< / ><>5195.00< / ><>3326.00< / ><>2.39< / ><>19.39< / ><>275.39< / >< / ><><>Cranwick< / ><>5030.00< / ><>60.00< / ><>5810.00< / ><>4775.00< / ><>2.24< / ><>17.00< / ><>207.95< / >< / ><><>Diageo#< / ><>1622.00< / ><>11.00< / ><>1903.91< / ><>1295.50< / ><>2.33< / ><>27.47< / ><>2997.24< / >< / ><><>Greencore< / ><>252.20< / ><>3.60< / ><>307.50< / ><>191.10< / ><>1.03< / ><>19.11< / ><>2119.88< / >< / ><><>Kerry Group*< / ><>7236.68< / ><>-266.07< / ><>7646.35< / ><>5567.81< / ><>1.69< / ><>21.34< / ><>81.12< / >< / ><><>Tate &

Lyle< / ><>569.50< / ><>-0.50< / ><>580.00< / ><>319.40< / ><>3.54< / ><>25.43< / ><>1531.85< / >< / ><><>Unilever< / ><>4626.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>5542.11< / ><>3644.00< / ><>3.57< / ><>12.61< / ><>2313.60< / >< / table>

<><>GN Store Nord< / ><>1187.49< / ><>-6.62< / ><>1429.97< / ><>984.75< / ><>—< / ><>15.43< / ><>254.70< / >< / ><><>Smith&Neph•< / ><>1003.50< / ><>-15.50< / ><>1426.59< / ><>980.40< / ><>2.99< / ><>18.41< / ><>9512.40< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">家居、休闲及个人用品< / >< / ><><>Barratt Redrow•< / ><>291.40< / ><>-8.70< / ><>410.29< / ><>235.40< / ><>2.06< / ><>21.43< / ><>5180.43< / >< / ><><>Bellway< / ><>1965.00< / ><>-35.00< / ><>2890.00< / ><>1715.00< / ><>3.66< / ><>14.80< / ><>400.73< / >< / ><><>Berkeley< / ><>3176.00< / ><>-16.00< / ><>4442.00< / ><>2796.00< / ><>—< / ><>9.58< / ><>370.66< / >< / ><><>Burberry Group< / ><>1007.00< / ><>-9.00< / ><>1376.50< / ><>953.40< / ><>—< / ><>1278.64< / >< / ><><>Cairn

Homes•< / td> 223.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>251.00< / ><>161.00< / ><>3.95< / ><>12.36< / ><>594.09< / >< / tr> <>Games Workshop< / ><>16350.00< / ><>-190.00< / ><>23540.00< / ><>14280.00< / ><>3.43< / ><>26.20< / ><>71.52< / >< / ><><>Gleeson (MJ)< / ><>270.50< / ><>2.00< / ><>435.00< / ><>221.00< / ><>1.85< / ><>-81.48< / ><>38.52< / >< / ><><>Headlam Group#< / ><>10.50< / ><>—< / ><>60.23< / ><>4.64< / ><>—< / ><>-0.10< / ><>—< / >< / ><><>McBride< / ><>174.00< / ><>-1.80< / ><>214.10< / ><>107.60< / ><>1.78< / ><>9.83< / ><>209.79< / >< / ><><>Philips< / ><>1820.18< / ><>-3.01< / ><>2413.42< / ><>1790.38< / ><>3.96< / ><>-42.96< / ><>1495.04< / >< / ><><>PZ

Cussons•< / ><>95.40< / ><>-0.80< / ><>114.00< / ><>65.09< / ><>3.88< / ><>20.30< / ><>393.13< / >< / ><><>Viatry Group< / ><>217.20< / ><>-7.40< / ><>746.40< / ><>216.00< / ><>—< / ><>5.15< / ><>2837.08< / >< / table>

35< / >< / table>

<><>Braemar< / ><>235.00< / ><>-< / ><>249.00< / ><>203.11< / ><>2.98< / ><>32.46< / ><>36.78< / >< / ><><>Fisher (J)< / ><>420.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>554.00< / ><>358.00< / ><>-< / ><>-48.28< / ><>66.85< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">保险< / >< / ><><>Admiral Group< / ><>3624.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>4128.00< / ><>2624.00< / ><>3.95< / ><>14.71< / ><>671.22< / >< / ><><>Aviva+< / ><>672.60< / ><>-4.60< / ><>740.60< / ><>590.60< / ><>5.98< / ><>25.00< / ><>3377.55< / >< / ><><>Chesnara+< / ><>326.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>378.00< / ><>265.00< / ><>7.04< / ><>-64.55< / ><>507.31< / >< / ><><>Ecclesiastical Insurance< / ><>130.25< / ><>-< / ><>155.00< / ><>125.50< / ><>6.62< / ><>-< / ><>61.49< / >< / ><><>Hansard

Global+< / ><>53.75< / ><>-0.25< / ><>60.80< / ><>43.20< / ><>8.28< / ><>11.44< / ><>47.62< / >< / ><><>Hiscox< / ><>1822.00< / ><>-12.00< / ><>1952.00< / ><>1288.00< / ><>2.15< / ><>13.34< / ><>1526.14< / >< / ><><>Lancashire Hldgs< / ><>635.00< / ><>-6.50< / ><>700.00< / ><>549.00< / ><>2.64< / ><>6.94< / ><>238.68< / >< / ><><>Legal & General< / ><>285.50< / ><>-2.60< / ><>318.10< / ><>217.20< / ><>7.67< / ><>28.58< / ><>21553.39< / >< / ><><>Old Mutual+< / ><>59.20< / ><>-< / ><>78.80< / ><>55.00< / ><>7.34< / ><>6.61< / ><>202.78< / >< / ><><>Prudential+< / ><>887.60< / ><>6.80< / ><>1238.00< / ><>867.40< / ><>2.37< / ><>7.61< / ><>11581.53< / >< / ><><>Standard

Life+< / ><>838.50< / ><>-33.00< / ><>960.00< / ><>633.50< / ><>6.69< / ><>-178.03< / ><>10498.61< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">休闲< / >< / ><><>ME Group< / ><>111.80< / ><>-2.00< / ><>195.94< / ><>98.50< / ><>7.50< / ><>7.45< / ><>505.93< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">日变动 + / -< / >< colspan="4">52 周< / >< rowspan="2">成交量 (千股)< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / >< / ><><>BP Marsh< / ><>655.00< / ><>-< / ><>710.00< / ><>613.00< / ><>5.54< / ><>4.94< / ><>5.85< / >< / ><><>Burlford Capital< / ><>249.20< / ><>-20.80< / ><>880.50< / ><>249.20< / ><>3.79< / ><>11.37< / ><>175.24< / >< / ><><>Premier Miton Group< / ><>34.75< / ><>-< / ><>64.00< / ><>34.50< / ><>8.63< / ><>44.55< / ><>768.39< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">食品与饮料< / >< / ><><>Camellia< / ><>5725.00< / ><>-175.00< / ><>6300.00< / ><>4800.00< / ><>4.54< / ><>-30.66< / ><>0.01< / >< / ><><>Fevertree

Drinks◆< / td> 845.00< / ><>5.00< / ><>973.00< / ><>711.00< / ><>2.06< / ><>44.99< / ><>381.19< / >< / tr> <>Nichols< / ><>1090.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>1200.00< / ><>880.00< / ><>3.57< / ><>18.58< / ><>22.98< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">家居、休闲与个人用品< / >< / ><><>Churchill◆< / ><>355.00< / ><>4.00< / ><>460.00< / ><>271.00< / ><>5.92< / ><>8.94< / ><>7.50< / >< / ><><>Frontier Dev◆< / ><>576.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>640.00< / ><>302.00< / ><>-< / ><>7.72< / ><>70.55< / >< / ><><>Portmeirion< / ><>47.50< / ><>-0.50< / ><>118.00< / ><>46.60< / ><>-< / ><>-1.05< / ><>121.10< / >< / ><><>Sanderson Design Grp< / ><>74.50< / ><>-< / ><>80.00< / ><>40.00< / ><>2.01< / ><>25.00< / ><>129.95< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">工业工程< / >< / ><><>MS

Intl< / ><>1565.00< / ><>30.00< / ><>1800.00< / ><>1120.00< / ><>1.66< / ><>23.22< / ><>15.79< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< ="2">日变动+ / -< / >< colspan="3">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">资产净值(NAV)< / >< ="2">分红-溢价< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Fidelity Spec< / ><>459.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>479.50< / ><>384.77< / ><>2.25< / ><>461.56< / ><>-0.36< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Finsbury G&I< / ><>776.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>875.00< / ><>706.25< / ><>2.71< / ><>828.68< / ><>-7.07< / ><>< / >< / ><><>The Glbl Small

Co< / ><>189.40< / ><>-0.80< / ><>198.60< / ><>162.72< / ><>1.66< / ><>200.02< / ><>-5.04< / ><>< / >< / ><><>GRIT(暂停)< / ><>1.25< / ><>—< / ><>1.25< / ><>—< / ><>14.40< / ><>-91.32< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Hansa< / ><>330.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>346.00< / ><>250.00< / ><>1.33< / ><>558.98< / ><>-40.47< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Hansa A< / ><>335.00< / ><>—< / ><>340.00< / ><>244.00< / ><>1.31< / ><>558.98< / ><>-39.94< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Hen FarEs< / ><>267.50< / ><>-3.50< / ><>281.50< / ><>229.00< / ><>9.36< / ><>254.09< / ><>5.68< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Hen High Inc< / ><>198.00< / ><>-0.50< / ><>214.00< / ><>173.25< / ><>5.62< / ><>208.32< / ><>-3.92< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Hen

Smrl< / ><>945.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>998.00< / ><>769.00< / ><>3.07< / ><>1047.47< / ><>-9.56< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Herald< / ><>2935.00< / ><>-35.00< / ><>3290.73< / ><>2285.00< / ><>—< / ><>3446.26< / ><>-13.41< / ><>< / >< / ><><>HICL Infra< / ><>131.00< / ><>—< / ><>141.00< / ><>107.20< / ><>6.49< / ><>160.40< / ><>-17.61< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Impax Env< / ><>454.00< / ><>1.50< / ><>494.76< / ><>379.00< / ><>1.15< / ><>505.12< / ><>-13.02< / ><>< / >< / ><><>IntlBiotech< / ><>1030.00< / ><>-30.00< / ><>1235.00< / ><>788.88< / ><>3.04< / ><>1077.35< / ><>-0.93< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Intl PP< / ><>135.00< / ><>-0.60< / ><>145.80< / ><>115.60< / ><>6.51< / ><>153.71< / ><>-11.11< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Inv Asia Dragon

Tst< / td><>493.00< / ><>-6.00< / ><>520.00< / ><>395.00< / ><>3.89< / ><>536.15< / ><>-7.34< / ><>< / >< / tr> <>Inv Bond Inc< / ><>168.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>178.50< / ><>150.11< / ><>7.29< / ><>166.01< / ><>1.60< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Amer IT< / ><>1246.00< / ><>—< / ><>1258.00< / ><>1041.00< / ><>0.92< / ><>1300.65< / ><>-3.72< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Asia G&I< / ><>578.00< / ><>-22.00< / ><>652.00< / ><>426.00< / ><>5.71< / ><>591.64< / ><>-0.32< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM China G&I< / ><>250.50< / ><>-4.00< / ><>313.00< / ><>250.00< / ><>4.55< / ><>277.61< / ><>-10.38< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Clavr< / ><>924.00< / ><>—< / ><>986.00< / ><>799.98< / ><>3.95< / ><>953.70< / ><>-3.56< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Emrg

EMEA< / ><>229.00< / ><>—< / ><>310.00< / ><>196.00< / ><>0.26< / ><>69.69< / ><>240.43< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Emrg< / ><>168.20< / ><>-3.60< / ><>181.20< / ><>126.20< / ><>4.48< / ><>184.65< / ><>-8.40< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Eur Disc< / ><>599.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>666.00< / ><>548.00< / ><>2.67< / ><>658.55< / ><>-8.26< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Eur G&I< / ><>135.20< / ><>-2.60< / ><>153.00< / ><>124.50< / ><>4.02< / ><>141.85< / ><>-3.46< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Em Mk Div< / ><>214.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>222.00< / ><>155.50< / ><>2.80< / ><>234.78< / ><>-8.30< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Gbl G&I< / ><>613.00< / ><>-0.50< / ><>641.00< / ><>529.60< / ><>4.05< / ><>635.35< / ><>-2.81< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM India Gwth

Inc< / ><>818.00< / ><>-16.00< / ><>1098.00< / ><>799.00< / ><>5.18< / ><>912.93< / ><>-8.79< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM Japan< / ><>830.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>867.00< / ><>668.00< / ><>1.05< / ><>918.13< / ><>-8.45< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM UK Sm< / ><>349.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>369.00< / ><>287.92< / ><>4.28< / ><>375.32< / ><>-7.17< / ><>< / >< / ><><>JPM US Sml< / ><>410.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>463.00< / ><>365.00< / ><>0.78< / ><>457.73< / ><>-9.00< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Law Deb< / ><>1192.00< / ><>-24.00< / ><>1290.00< / ><>991.00< / ><>3.06< / ><>1189.47< / ><>1.37< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Lindsell

Train< / ><>574.00< / ><>—< / ><>750.00< / ><>529.50< / ><>4.88< / ><>6.52< / ><>-13.88< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Lowland< / ><>182.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>191.50< / ><>148.00< / ><>3.78< / ><>199.93< / ><>-8.32< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Marwyn Val< / ><>141.00< / ><>—< / ><>141.30< / ><>140.52< / ><>6.43< / ><>264.21< / ><>-46.63< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Mercantile< / ><>268.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>290.50< / ><>234.31< / ><>3.10< / ><>299.74< / ><>-9.56< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Merch. Trst< / ><>648.00< / ><>-9.00< / ><>691.00< / ><>536.25< / ><>4.61< / ><>678.99< / ><>-4.47< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Mid Wynd< / ><>796.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>814.00< / ><>682.00< / ><>1.08< / ><>817.34< / ><>-2.18< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Monks

IT< / td> 1674.00< / ><>4.00< / ><>1687.13< / ><>1366.00< / ><>0.05< / ><>1763.63< / ><>-5.46< / ><>< / >< / tr> <>Montanaro Eur< / ><>174.50< / ><>-1.50< / ><>189.00< / ><>142.00< / ><>0.89< / ><>195.14< / ><>-9.75< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Murray Inc< / ><>952.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>1036.00< / ><>854.66< / ><>4.31< / ><>1019.10< / ><>-6.67< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Murray Intl< / ><>353.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>376.00< / ><>296.50< / ><>3.63< / ><>353.66< / ><>0.69< / ><>< / >< / ><><>New Star IT< / ><>138.00< / ><>—< / ><>148.00< / ><>111.00< / ><>2.57< / ><>202.71< / ><>-30.68< / ><>< / >< / ><><>N. Atl Smrl IT< / ><>418.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>434.00< / ><>328.00< / ><>1.67< / ><>649.93< / ><>-34.61< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Pac.

Horiz.< / ><>1114.00< / ><>-18.00< / ><>1262.00< / ><>719.00< / ><>—< / ><>1227.11< / ><>-9.14< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Pers. Assets< / ><>541.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>558.00< / ><>515.00< / ><>1.04< / ><>547.41< / ><>-0.70< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Polar Health< / ><>417.50< / ><>-17.50< / ><>460.50< / ><>352.11< / ><>0.53< / ><>426.53< / ><>1.22< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Polar Fin.< / ><>236.50< / ><>-2.50< / ><>260.50< / ><>199.16< / ><>—< / ><>246.78< / ><>-3.16< / ><>< / >< / ><><>Polar Tech.< / ><>705.50< / ><>-6.50< / ><>743.50< / ><>420.00< / ><>—< / ><>787.01< / ><>-8.70< / ><>< / >< / table>

<>Relx■< / ><>2595.00< / ><>-4.00< / ><>3539.00< / ><>1991.00< / ><>2.66< / ><>23.05< / ><>3336.33< / >< / ><><>Rightmove◆< / ><>502.60< / ><>41.10< / ><>700.40< / ><>391.40< / ><>2.14< / ><>17.89< / ><>6856.71< / >< / ><><>STV Group< / ><>101.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>124.50< / ><>95.60< / ><>-< / ><>-9.35< / ><>8.80< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">采矿业< / >< / table>

<>2502.09< / >< / ><><>力拓 (Rio Tinto)■< / ><>7022.00< / ><>-< / ><>9117.00< / ><>4955.50< / ><>4.96< / ><>15.13< / ><>1688.13< / >< / table>

<><>BP■< / ><>584.80< / ><>22.80< / ><>609.40< / ><>399.35< / ><>4.29< / ><>-< / ><>35375.16< / >< / ><><>Capricorn< / ><>429.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>450.00< / ><>181.80< / ><>-< / ><>20.26< / ><>545.80< / >< / ><><>埃克森美孚控股 (ExxonMobil Hldgs)< / ><>12710.10< / ><>-< / ><>12780.40< / ><>12620.10< / ><>2.45< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>GeoPark< / ><>864.93< / ><>-< / ><>874.00< / ><>858.13< / ><>0.80< / ><>13.95< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Helleniq Energy< / ><>1546.48< / ><>-< / ><>1546.48< / ><>1499.87< / ><>3.29< / ><>6.27< / ><>510.21< / >< / ><><>帝国石油 (Imperial Oil) C$< / ><>9267.51< / ><>221.58< / ><>10397.16< / ><>6229.98< / ><>2.00< / ><>-< / ><>425.90< / >< / ><><>TC Energy

Corp♦< / ><>4537.85< / ><>-< / ><>4539.44< / ><>4480.46< / ><>4.11< / ><>-24.01< / ><>913.08< / >< / table>

<><>阿斯利康 (AstraZeneca)■< / ><>11892.00< / ><>-288.00< / ><>15732.00< / ><>9892.00< / ><>2.01< / ><>23.83< / ><>2276.63< / >< / ><><>Chemical Works< / ><>2867.55< / ><>-< / ><>2867.55< / ><>5.29< / ><>14.83< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>葛兰素史克 (GlaxoSmKline)■●< / ><>1735.50< / ><>-55.00< / ><>2282.00< / ><>1592.00< / ><>4.03< / ><>12.30< / ><>16331.28< / >< / ><><>Hikma Pharm< / ><>1607.00< / ><>-39.00< / ><>1865.00< / ><>1187.00< / ><>4.05< / ><>11.68< / ><>623.04< / >< / table>

房地产投资信托 (REITs)< / td>< / tr><><>British Land< / ><>384.80< / ><>-6.40< / ><>451.60< / ><>335.40< / ><>6.01< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Derwent London< / ><>1749.00< / ><>-37.00< / ><>2196.00< / ><>1469.33< / ><>4.69< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Great Portland Est< / ><>300.80< / ><>-3.80< / ><>377.00< / ><>270.00< / ><>2.73< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Land Securities< / ><>601.00< / ><>-11.50< / ><>726.00< / ><>525.00< / ><>6.86< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>LondonMetric Prop< / ><>172.00< / ><>-0.40< / ><>216.20< / ><>170.20< / ><>7.30< / ><>-< / ><>-19.53< / >< / ><><>Primary Health Prop< / ><>89.25< / ><>-< / ><>109.60< / ><>87.40< / ><>8.18< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Segro< / ><>908.00< / ><>-5.60< / ><>997.40< / ><>632.20< / ><>3.47< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Shaftesbury Capital< / ><>134.10< / ><>-2.00< / ><>155.10< / ><>124.10< / ><>3.21< / ><>7.17< / ><>2012.60< / >< / ><><>Tritax Big Box< / ><>138.90< / ><>-2.70< / ><>175.00< / ><>138.50< / ><>5.94< / ><>-< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">房地产投资与服务< / >< / ><><>Grainger< / ><>159.90< / ><>-4.00< / ><>202.79< / ><>149.44< / ><>5.25< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Harworth Group▲< / ><>187.00< / ><>-< / ><>195.00< / ><>116.80< / ><>0.98< / ><>64.48< / ><>1091.99< / >< / ><><>Helical< / ><>175.00< / ><>-2.00< / ><>236.25< / ><>170.50< / ><>1.50< / ><>36.23< / ><>93.79< / >< / ><><>Mountview Estates< / ><>8500.00< / ><>-125.00< / ><>10200.00< / ><>8350.00< / ><>6.18< / ><>16.28< / ><>0.43< / >< / ><><>Savills< / ><>955.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>1142.00< / ><>791.46< / ><>2.46< / ><>18.37< / ><>427.84< / >< / ><><>Sirius Real Estate< / ><>88.75< / ><>0.55< / ><>113.00< / ><>85.85< / ><>6.11< / ><>6.91< / ><>3272.65< / >< / ><><>Smart (J)< / ><>115.00< / ><>-< / ><>140.00< / ><>106.00< / ><>2.83< / ><>8.80< / ><>-< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">零售商< / >< / ><><>Caffyns< / ><>500.00< / ><>-< / ><>550.00< / ><>350.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>-12.29< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>Dunelm Group< / ><>788.00< / ><>-< / ><>1174.00< / ><>707.00< / ><>8.95< / ><>10.23< / ><>302.18< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">+ / - 日变动< / >< colspan="4">52周< / >< rowspan="2">成交量(千)< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / >< / ><><>Halfords Group< / ><>258.50< / ><>-1.50< / ><>276.10< / ><>123.80< / ><>3.48< / ><>17.01< / ><>498.18< / >< / ><><>Inchcape< / ><>658.00< / ><>14.00< / ><>895.00< / ><>627.87< / ><>5.11< / ><>9.08< / ><>2145.67< / >< / ><><>JD Sports< / ><>84.02< / ><>0.52< / ><>104.65< / ><>63.98< / ><>1.51< / ><>9.74< / ><>6578.21< / >< / ><><>Kingfisher*< / ><>322.40< / ><>-6.70< / ><>372.30< / ><>266.40< / ><>3.85< / ><>23.03< / ><>6351.97< / >< / ><><>Marks & Spencer< / ><>396.10< / ><>2.30< / ><>418.33< / ><>301.10< / ><>1.06< / ><>31.19< / ><>6155.45< / >< / ><><>Saga< / ><>755.00< / ><>-6.00< / ><>799.00< / ><>234.50< / ><>–< / ><>536.89< / >< / ><><>Sainsbury J< / ><>332.40< / ><>4.80< / ><>380.30< / ><>293.70< / ><>4.12< / ><>19.21< / ><>16263.31< / >< / ><><>Tesco< / ><>500.40< / ><>24.60< / ><>512.60< / ><>411.70< / ><>2.95< / ><>18.20< / ><>30091.28< / >< / table>

< / td>< colspan="7">52周< / >< / tr><><>价格< / ><>+ / - 日变动< / ><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>市盈率< / ><>成交量 (千股)< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">媒体< / >< / ><><>Mission Group< / ><>25.50< / ><>-< / ><>29.00< / ><>12.00< / ><>-< / ><>-1.20< / ><>84.84< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">采矿< / >< / ><><>Central Asia Metals●< / ><>151.20< / ><>1.20< / ><>244.00< / ><>125.27< / ><>10.25< / ><>-4.70< / ><>851.81< / >< / ><><>Crim St Therapeutics< / ><>9.25< / ><>-< / ><>18.50< / ><>8.00< / ><>-< / ><>-1.81< / ><>24.46< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">石油与天然气< / >< / ><><>BorSthnPet< / ><>8.16< / ><>0.20< / ><>14.00< / ><>7.26< / ><>-< / ><>-67.46< / ><>10141.47< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">制药与生物技术< / >< / ><><>Sareum Holdings#< / ><>27.50< / ><>-< / ><>40.00< / ><>9.50< / ><>-< / ><>-11.46< / ><>-< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">零售商< / >< / ><><>Boohoo Group< / ><>24.60< / ><>0.60< / ><>29.50< / ><>10.30< / ><>-< / ><>-3.18< / ><>832.13< / >< / ><><>CVS Group< / ><>1145.00< / ><>-18.00< / ><>1648.00< / ><>1062.00< / ><>0.79< / ><>46.93< / ><>290.78< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< rowspan="2">+ / - 日变动< / >< colspan="4">52周< / >< rowspan="2">折 / 溢价(-)< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / ><>收益率< / ><>资产净值 (NAV)< / >< / ><><>Rights & Iss IT< / ><>2480.00< / ><>40.00< / ><>2520.00< / ><>1965.13< / ><>1.82< / ><>3030.20< / ><>-18.64< / >< / ><><>RIT Cap.< / ><>2450.00< / ><>-15.00< / ><>2645.00< / ><>1985.25< / ><>1.84< / ><>3198.50< / ><>-23.25< / >< / ><><>Ruffer Inv Pr< / ><>291.50< / ><>-1.50< / ><>319.00< / ><>281.26< / ><>2.12< / ><>301.63< / ><>-3.77< / >< / ><><>Schdr AsiaPac< / ><>832.00< / ><>-17.00< / ><>892.00< / ><>641.35< / ><>1.56< / ><>927.23< / ><>-9.31< / >< / ><><>Schdr AsiaTotal< / ><>700.00< / ><>-13.00< / ><>746.00< / ><>530.00< / ><>1.64< / ><>744.14< / ><>-5.53< / >< / ><><>Schroder Inc< / ><>352.00< / ><>1.00< / ><>380.00< / ><>314.00< / ><>4.35< / ><>373.83< / ><>-5.75< / >< / ><><>Schdr Japan< / ><>385.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>402.53< / ><>276.00< / ><>3.46< / ><>424.31< / ><>-8.65< / >< / ><><>Schdr Orient.< / ><>451.00< / ><>-7.00< / ><>478.00< / ><>317.00< / ><>2.93< / ><>476.24< / ><>-4.72< / >< / ><><>Schdr UK Mid< / ><>750.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>790.00< / ><>652.00< / ><>3.01< / ><>796.19< / ><>-4.52< / >< / ><><>Scot American< / ><>552.00< / ><>-1.00< / ><>572.00< / ><>480.10< / ><>2.97< / ><>596.94< / ><>-7.29< / >< / ><><>Scot Mortgage< / ><>1623.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>1651.50< / ><>1015.74< / ><>0.28< / ><>1787.01< / ><>-8.86< / >< / ><><>Scot Oriental< / ><>279.00< / ><>-3.00< / ><>295.00< / ><>240.00< / ><>1.22< / ><>312.75< / ><>-10.07< / >< / ><><>Strategic Eq.< / ><>400.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>415.00< / ><>330.00< / ><>1.12< / ><>445.96< / ><>-9.78< / >< / ><><>Temple Bar< / ><>410.00< / ><>0.50< / ><>429.50< / ><>345.25< / ><>3.80< / ><>410.40< / ><>0.10< / >< / ><><>Tetragon< / ><>1107.62< / ><>-0.63< / ><>1476.82< / ><>892.96< / ><>3.21< / ><>—< / ><>< / >< / ><><>TRIG< / ><>75.40< / ><>-0.30< / ><>80.50< / ><>63.20< / ><>10.01< / ><>101.36< / ><>-25.09< / >< / ><><>UIL< / ><>211.00< / ><>—< / ><>212.00< / ><>210.00< / ><>3.79< / ><>286.24< / ><>-26.61< / >< / ><><>Utilico

EmerMkts< / td> 295.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>302.00< / ><>243.00< / ><>3.28< / ><>324.17< / ><>-10.35< / >< / tr> <>Worldwide Hlth< / ><>358.00< / ><>-13.50< / ><>401.50< / ><>322.52< / ><>0.67< / ><>394.98< / ><>-6.14< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">常规 - 私募股权< / >< / ><><>CT PrivEq< / ><>454.00< / ><>-5.00< / ><>592.00< / ><>439.84< / ><>6.24< / ><>689.05< / ><>-32.62< / >< / ><><>HGCapital< / ><>365.50< / ><>-7.50< / ><>512.00< / ><>318.64< / ><>1.37< / ><>530.14< / ><>-28.22< / >< / ><><>HVPE< / ><>3205.00< / ><>-30.00< / ><>3500.00< / ><>2807.59< / ><>—< / ><>4518.00< / ><>-27.18< / >< / ><><>ICG Ent< / ><>1380.00< / ><>—< / ><>1611.42< / ><>1288.31< / ><>3.04< / ><>2089.33< / ><>-32.48< / >< / ><><>Pantheon

Int< / ><>379.50< / ><>-2.00< / ><>409.00< / ><>339.05< / ><>—< / ><>534.60< / ><>-27.80< / >< / ><><>Partners PE €< / ><>591.48< / ><>-1.29< / ><>945.52< / ><>569.45< / ><>10.03< / ><>11.58< / ><>-40.07< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">常规 - 房地产投资公司< / >< / ><><>AEW UK REIT< / ><>97.30< / ><>-2.10< / ><>113.20< / ><>95.90< / ><>8.22< / ><>106.91< / ><>-7.28< / >< / ><><> Prop< / ><>268.50< / ><>-2.50< / ><>364.50< / ><>267.50< / ><>6.00< / ><>304.65< / ><>-9.22< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">风险资本信托 (VCTs)< / >< / ><><>Bmd 2nd VT< / ><>45.40< / ><>1.00< / ><>54.00< / ><>39.50< / ><>8.81< / ><>46.55< / ><>-4.62< / >< / ><><>Nthn 2 VCT< / ><>53.00< / ><>—< / ><>56.50< / ><>47.00< / ><>5.66< / ><>55.40< / ><>-4.33< / >< / ><><>Nthn 3

VCT< / ><>82.00< / ><>—< / ><>86.50< / ><>79.50< / ><>5.49< / ><>86.00< / ><>-4.65< / >< / ><><>Nthn Venture< / ><>56.00< / ><>—< / ><>59.50< / ><>53.00< / ><>5.54< / ><>58.60< / ><>-4.44< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">零股息优先股< / >< / ><><>Aberforth GV< / ><>118.00< / ><>—< / ><>120.18< / ><>111.00< / ><>—< / ><>116.61< / ><>1.21< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">投资公司 - AIM< / >< / ><><>Crys Amber< / ><>75.00< / ><>-0.50< / ><>155.39< / ><>72.10< / ><>—< / ><>172.64< / ><>-55.69< / >< / table>

wden Joinery< / ><>748.00< / ><>-6.50< / ><>981.00< / ><>713.00< / ><>2.94< / ><>15.20< / ><>909.38< / >< / ><><>Intertek< / ><>5980.00< / ><>-10.00< / ><>5900.00< / ><>3519.42< / ><>2.80< / ><>27.01< / ><>113.72< / >< / ><><>Johnson Service●< / ><>135.60< / ><>-1.80< / ><>172.10< / ><>123.80< / ><>3.69< / ><>14.58< / ><>1306.14< / >< / ><><>MITIE Group< / ><>210.20< / ><>-0.20< / ><>214.00< / ><>134.80< / ><>2.14< / ><>31.85< / ><>3839.73< / >< / ><><>RS Group< / ><>750.00< / ><>-6.50< / ><>790.00< / ><>536.90< / ><>3.05< / ><>21.68< / ><>1390.85< / >< / ><><>Vp< / ><>532.00< / ><>20.00< / ><>608.00< / ><>420.00< / ><>7.42< / ><>-38.55< / ><>8.02< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">科技 - 软件与服务< / >< / ><><>Computacenter•< / ><>5485.00< / ><>35.00< / ><>6045.00< / ><>2578.00< / ><>1.42< / ><>37.44< / ><>426.66< / >< / ><><>NCC Group•< / ><>149.00< / ><>-0.20< / ><>161.60< / ><>107.20< / ><>3.12< / ><>26.61< / ><>758.43< / >< / ><><>The Sage Grp< / ><>1027.50< / ><>5.50< / ><>1181.00< / ><>771.66< / ><>2.18< / ><>27.23< / ><>4099.89< / >< / ><><>Triad Group< / ><>380.00< / ><>-< / ><>430.00< / ><>236.00< / ><>2.37< / ><>38.31< / ><>0.04< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">电信< / >< / ><><>Airtel Africa< / ><>309.60< / ><>-3.20< / ><>436.20< / ><>219.00< / ><>1.73< / ><>22.02< / ><>6904.27< / >< / ><><>BT

Group< / td> 197.45< / ><>-1.00< / ><>242.09< / ><>173.00< / ><>4.21< / ><>17.95< / ><>20293.44< / >< / tr> <>Telecom Plus< / ><>839.00< / ><>-11.00< / ><>1896.00< / ><>638.00< / ><>5.96< / ><>8.29< / ><>561.11< / >< / ><><>Vodafone< / ><>124.40< / ><>-3.35< / ><>132.07< / ><>83.40< / ><>3.19< / ><>-88.97< / ><>45969.79< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">烟草< / >< / table>

<><>英美烟草■< / ><>4161.00< / ><>77.00< / ><>5326.00< / ><>3677.00< / ><>5.89< / ><>11.85< / ><>5977.63< / >< / ><><>帝国品牌< / ><>2614.00< / ><>126.00< / ><>3632.04< / ><>2408.00< / ><>6.38< / ><>10.41< / ><>4683.72< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">旅游与休闲< / >< / ><><>easyJet< / ><>681.00< / ><>1.40< / ><>683.80< / ><>332.60< / ><>1.94< / ><>10.35< / ><>3178.55< / >< / ><><>FirstGroup< / ><>187.00< / ><>0.40< / ><>222.60< / ><>152.10< / ><>3.85< / ><>8.74< / ><>1122.77< / >< / ><><>Fullers 'A'< / ><>708.00< / ><>6.00< / ><>780.00< / ><>570.00< / ><>2.99< / ><>18.05< / ><>28.70< / >< / ><><>洲际酒店< / ><>11907.90< / ><>-207.24< / ><>13305.06< / ><>8762.00< / ><>1.18< / ><>32.08< / ><>172.30< / >< / ><><>Intl Cons

Air< / ><>420.00< / ><>-12.80< / ><>492.90< / ><>332.70< / ><>1.60< / ><>6.95< / ><>11772.07< / >< / ><><>Whitbread< / ><>2445.00< / ><>-27.00< / ><>3278.00< / ><>2098.00< / ><>3.97< / ><>19.83< / ><>507.39< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">公用事业< / >< / ><><>Drax Group▲< / ><>780.50< / ><>4.50< / ><>937.50< / ><>695.50< / ><>3.88< / ><>37.71< / ><>550.53< / >< / ><><>国家电网▲< / ><>1152.50< / ><>2.50< / ><>1428.50< / ><>1086.25< / ><>4.21< / ><>17.60< / ><>6586.37< / >< / ><><>Pennon< / ><>371.00< / ><>9.80< / ><>606.00< / ><>340.00< / ><>7.89< / ><>19.12< / ><>10761.98< / >< / ><><>Severn

Trent< / ><>3096.00< / ><>38.00< / ><>3335.00< / ><>2381.00< / ><>4.07< / ><>25.07< / ><>1287.51< / >< / ><><>SSE< / ><>2437.00< / ><>-22.00< / ><>2767.50< / ><>1760.00< / ><>2.82< / ><>23.10< / ><>2877.76< / >< / table>

<>< rowspan="2">< / >< rowspan="2">价格< / >< ="2">+ / - 日变动< / >< colspan="2">52周< / >< ="2">收益率< / >< ="2">市盈率< / >< ="2">成交量 (千股)< / >< / ><><>最高< / ><>最低< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">支持服务< / >< / ><><>Christie●< / ><>180.00< / ><>-< / ><>199.60< / ><>90.00< / ><>2.22< / ><>35.43< / ><>0.66< / >< / ><><>LonSec< / ><>3750.00< / ><>-< / ><>3900.00< / ><>2100.00< / ><>2.59< / ><>19.33< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>NWF< / ><>160.00< / ><>3.00< / ><>187.50< / ><>110.00< / ><>5.44< / ><>8.60< / ><>123.79< / >< / ><><>Petards< / ><>8.50< / ><>-< / ><>12.50< / ><>7.00< / ><>-< / ><>-12.69< / ><>65.39< / >< / ><><>Renew< / ><>946.00< / ><>-19.00< / ><>1016.00< / ><>821.00< / ><>2.15< / ><>15.34< / ><>86.72< / >< / ><><

colspan="8">科技 - 软件与服务< / >< / table>

<><>Oxford Metrics< / ><>34.90< / ><>-< / ><>60.40< / ><>34.90< / ><>9.31< / ><>-63.45< / ><>82.04< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">旅游与休闲< / >< / ><><>Gaming Realms< / ><>31.80< / ><>0.20< / ><>47.20< / ><>29.00< / ><>-< / ><>15.66< / ><>105.87< / >< / ><><>Jet2♦< / ><>1414.00< / ><>-6.00< / ><>1612.00< / ><>980.00< / ><>1.20< / ><>6.70< / ><>334.42< / >< / table>

FT 股票服务指南

所有数据均为上一个工作日收盘时的数据。公司分类基于富时（FTSE）采用的 ICB 系统。富时 100 指数（FTSE 100）成份股以粗体显示。除非另有说明，收盘价以便士（pence）显示。最高价和最低价基于滚动 52 周期间的日内交易。市盈率（P / E）基于最新的年度报告和账目，并使用中期数据进行更新。市盈率使用公司持续经营的稀释收益计算。收益率基于收盘价以及上一财年支付的股息，并使用中期数据进行更新。收益率以净额显示；英国公司的股息扣除 10% 的税款，非英国公司则为税前总额。最高价、最低价、收益率和市盈率在适当情况下已根据资本变动进行了调整。交易量为日终汇总总量，四舍五入至最接近的 1,000 股。每股净资产价值（NAV）和拆分分析仅作为参考。折价和溢价使用最新的含权公允净资产价值预估值和收盘价计算。折价、溢价、总赎回收益率（GRY）以及相对于股价（SP）的门槛率（HR）和相对于清算（WO）的门槛率（HR）以百分比显示，NAV 以便士显示。

- 除权交易

■ 除资本分配交易

暂停交易时的价格

所列价格仅供参考，且在发布时被认为是准确的。洲际交易所（ICE）或《金融时报》（FT）均未做出任何要约。《金融时报》不保证该信息的可靠性或完整性。《金融时报》不承担责任，且不对因依赖或使用该信息而产生的任何损失负责。

FT 股票服务是一项付费的印刷列表服务，可能无法完全代表所有在伦敦证券交易所（LSE）上市的公司。本服务面向所有上市公司开放，但须经编辑决定。有关新销售咨询，请发送电子邮件至 data@ft.com。如需进一步信息，请联系 newspapers@ice.com

数据提供方：

市场与数据在此汇聚。

金融时报

您的股价是否引起关注？

《金融时报》股票服务板块可帮助您通过印刷版和在线版，触达并吸引来自全球范围内具有财务意识的决策者和富裕股东。

如需投放广告，请联系 carol.ramsey@ft.com

买入价 卖出价 + / - 收益率 24m 36m 基金

管理基金服务

买入价 卖出价 + / - 收益率 24m 36m 基金 买入价 卖出价 + / - 收益率 24m 36m

Algebris 投资

Candriam 投资者集团

Algebris Core Italy I EUR	€	242.59	-	-6.91	0.00	26.10	18.59
Algebris Core Italy R EUR	€	223.76	-	-6.38	0.00	25.17	17.71
Algebris Financial Credit I EUR	€	225.85	-	-0.36	0.00	5.47	8.85
Algebris Financial Credit I GBP	£	200.37	-	-0.31	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Credit I USD	$	208.95	-	-0.33	5.86	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Credit R EUR	€	189.69	-	-0.35	0.00	4.79	8.21
Algebris Financial Equity B EUR	€	371.56	-	-5.47	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Equity R EUR	€	300.75	-	-4.43	0.00	28.23	29.62
Algebris Financial Equity Fund B GBP	£	311.08	-	-4.55	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Equity Fund B USD	$	469.37	-	-6.85	3.90	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Income I EUR	€	296.43	-	-2.21	0.00	15.66	17.95
Algebris Financial Income R EUR	€	260.59	-	-1.95	0.00	14.63	16.90
Algebris Financial Income Fund I GBP	£	218.13	-	-1.61	6.02	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Income Fund I USD	$	249.26	-	-1.83	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities I EUR	€	152.34	-	-0.04	0.00	2.83	5.54
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities R EUR	€	145.93	-	-0.04	0.00	2.29	5.02
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities I GBP	£	151.97	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities I USD	$	156.84	-	-0.04	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris IG Financial Credit I EUR	€	118.14	-	-0.11	0.00	3.74	6.68
Algebris IG Financial Credit R EUR	€	114.10	-	-0.12	0.00	3.22	6.15
Algebris Strategic Credit Fund R EUR	€	113.68	-	-0.19	0.00	2.31	4.66
Algebris Global Equity Select B EUR	€	153.94	-	-2.92	0.00	8.44	11.42
Algebris Global Equity Select R EUR	€	146.23	-	-2.78	0.00	7.05	9.99

Blue Whale 投资资金 ICAV (www.bluewhale.co.uk, info@bluewhale.co.uk)							(爱尔兰)
FCA 认可 - 爱尔兰 UCITS
Blue Whale Growth USD T	$	25.22	-	-0.27	0.00	0.00	0.00

CG Portfolio Fund PLC< / td>< / tr><><>Absolute Return M Inc< / ><>£< / ><>144.25< / ><>-< / ><>-0.23< / ><>2.61< / ><>2.86< / ><>2.38< / >< / ><><>Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP P< / ><>£< / ><>39528.49< / ><>-< / ><>-62.27< / ><>1.95< / ><>2.82< / ><>2.27< / >< / ><><>Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP V< / ><>£< / ><>192.28< / ><>-< / ><>-0.30< / ><>1.94< / ><>2.84< / ><>2.28< / >< / ><><>Dollar Fund Cis D Inc< / ><>£< / ><>153.04< / ><>-< / ><>0.31< / ><>2.82< / ><>-1.10< / ><>-2.24< / >< / ><><>Dollar Hedged GBP Inc< / ><>£< / ><>92.57< / ><>-< / ><>0.07< / ><>2.54< / ><>-0.01< / ><>-0.63< / >< / ><><>Real Return Cls A Inc< / ><>£< / ><>183.11< / ><>-< / ><>0.30< / ><>2.55< / ><>-0.68< / ><>-2.19< / >< / ><><>UK Index-Linked Bond G Inc< / ><>£< / ><>105.11< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>2.10< / ><>0.77< / ><>0.00< / >< / table> 8

Canaccord WEALTH

Chartered Asset Management Pte Ltd

其他国际基金< / td>< / tr><><>CAM-GTF VCC< / ><>$ 477779.20< / ><>47779.20< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.49< / ><>3.79< / >< / ><><>CAM Gti VCC< / ><>$ 1755.82< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>20.88< / ><>4.69< / >< / ><><>RAIC VCC< / ><>$ 1.90< / ><>-< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.97< / ><>-1.66< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">授权投资基金< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 全球影响力债券基金< / ><>84.15< / ><>-< / ><>-0.13< / ><>4.34< / ><>-1.76< / ><>-0.43< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 绿色影响力股票基金< / ><>132.10< / ><>-< / ><>-1.70< / ><>0.95< / ><>7.22< / ><>8.73< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 绿色影响力基础设施基金< / ><>75.60< / ><>-< / ><>-0.47< / ><>6.81< / ><>-4.09< / ><>-7.16< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 全球可持续政府债券基金< / ><>94.41< / ><>-< / ><>-0.03< / ><>3.18< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续欧洲股票基金 A< / ><>469.70< / ><>-< / ><>-4.20< / ><>1.94< / ><>10.17< / ><>12.08< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续欧洲股票基金 B< / ><>475.00< / ><>-< / ><>-4.30< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.16< / ><>12.07< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续全球股票基金 A< / ><>459.60< / ><>-< / ><>-3.60< / ><>0.53< / ><>9.53< / ><>9.48< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续全球股票基金 B< / ><>464.00< / ><>-< / ><>-3.60< / ><>0.95< / ><>9.51< / ><>9.48< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续管理收益基金 A< / ><>133.50< / ><>-< / ><>-0.80< / ><>4.21< / ><>3.04< / ><>3.02< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续管理收益基金 B< / ><>144.80< / ><>-< / ><>-0.90< / ><>4.17< / ><>3.51< / ><>3.43< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续短期债券基金< / ><>94.41< / ><>-< / ><>-0.08< / ><>4.64< / ><>-0.24< / ><>0.63< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续英镑债券基金 A< / ><>82.27< / ><>-< / ><>-0.21< / ><>5.11< / ><>-1.77< / ><>-0.28< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续英镑债券基金 B< / ><>95.02< / ><>-< / ><>-0.24< / ><>5.11< / ><>-1.18< / ><>0.32< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票基金 A< / ><>246.30< / ><>-< / ><>-1.10< / ><>1.82< / ><>4.41< / ><>3.48< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票基金 B< / ><>245.70< / ><>-< / ><>-1.10< / ><>2.20< / ><>2.58< / ><>3.44< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票机遇基金 A< / ><>318.00< / ><>-< / ><>-1.20< / ><>1.53< / ><>1.70< / ><>4.85< / >< / ><><>EdenTree 可持续英国股票机遇基金 B< / ><>324.80< / ><>-< / ><>-1.20< / ><>1.99< / ><>1.67< / ><>4.83< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">Canaccord Wealth International Multi Strategy Funds Limited< / >< / ><><>平衡策略< / ><>£< / ><>1.19< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.61< / ><>11.20< / >< / ><><>平衡策略 A< / ><>£< / ><>1.19< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.84< / ><>8.57< / ><>8.74< / >< / ><><>谨慎平衡策略< / ><>£< / ><>1.48< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.91< / ><>8.99< / ><>8.97< / >< / ><><>谨慎平衡策略 A< / ><>£< / ><>1.06< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.84< / ><>6.66< / ><>7.14< / >< / ><><>增长策略< / ><>£< / ><>2.70< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.76< / ><>1.61< / ><>5.68< / >< / ><><>增长策略 A< / ><>£< / ><>1.29< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.54< / ><>10.51< / ><>11.01< / >< / ><><>高增长策略< / >

GBP< / td> £< / ><>4.00< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.24< / ><>14.83< / ><>14.94< / >< / tr> <>高增长策略 A< / ><>£< / ><>1.37< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.52< / ><>12.56< / ><>12.43< / >< / ><><>高收益债券基金 B 月度< / ><>£< / ><>0.97< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>高收益债券基金 B 季度< / ><>£< / ><>0.97< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>美元增长策略< / ><>$< / ><>2.57< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.21< / ><>14.46< / ><>14.73< / >< / table>

CP Global Asset Management Pte.Ltd.

<><>www.cpglobal.com.sg, 电子邮件: customer_support@cpglobal.com.sg< / >< / ><><>国际共同基金< / >< / table>

每日交易。A 类份额初始费用为零，其他类份额最高为 $2\%$。

CP Capital Asset Management Limited

<>< colspan="7">国际共同基金< / >< / ><><>CP 双用途基金< / ><>$< / ><>217.88< / ><>-< / ><>-0.06< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>CP 全球阿尔法基金< / ><>$< / ><>509.96< / ><>-< / ><>-0.15< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.19< / >< / ><><>CPS-主私人基金< / ><>$< / ><>616.61< / ><>-< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.01< / >< / table>

<><>Artemis 企业债券 I 累积< / ><>116.66< / ><>-< / ><>-0.33< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.24< / ><>5.74< / >< / ><><>Artemis 全球收益 I 分配< / ><>236.65< / ><>-< / ><>-3.86< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.17< / ><>0.50< / >< / ><><>Artemis 高收益 I 季度收益< / ><>73.58< / ><>-< / ><>-0.18< / ><>0.23< / ><>1.20< / ><>2.19< / >< / ><><>Artemis 收益 I 收益< / ><>342.71< / ><>-< / ><>-0.49< / ><>5.48< / ><>9.44< / ><>10.38< / >< / ><><>Artemis 月度分配 I 收益< / ><>100.02< / ><>-< / ><>-0.85< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.09< / ><>12.50< / >< / ><><>Artemis 短期策略债券< / ><>132.86< / ><>-< / ><>-0.14< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.72< / ><>6.91< / >< / ><><>Artemis SmartGARP 欧元股票 I 累积< / ><>969.74< / ><>-< / ><>-10.99< / ><>0.00< / ><>23.96< / ><>26.36< / >< / ><><>Artemis SmartGARP 全球小型公司 I 累积< / ><>263.39< / ><>-< / ><>-2.77< / ><>1.95< / ><>15.16< / ><>14.90< / >< / ><><>Artemis SmartGARP 全球新兴市场股票 I 累积< / ><>360.94< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>32.68< / ><>27.08< / >< / ><><>Artemis SmartGARP 全球股票 I 累积< / ><>825.11< / ><>-< / ><>-6.12< / ><>0.00< / ><>28.86< / ><>26.87< / >< / ><><>Artemis SmartGARP 英国股票 I 累积< / ><>4649.63< / ><>-< / ><>-39.94< / ><>2.41< / ><>24.25< / ><>22.86< / >< / ><><>Artemis 战略资产 I 累积< / ><>111.33< / ><>-< / ><>0.03< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.79< / ><>3.35< / >< / ><><>Artemis 战略债券 I 季度累积< / ><>123.60< / ><>-< / ><>-0.23< / ><>4.46< / ><>5.49< / ><>6.19< / >< / ><><>Artemis 英国精选基金 I 类累积< / ><>1406.19< / ><>-< / ><>-24.41< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.88< / ><>18.32< / >< / ><><>Artemis 英国小型公司 I 累积< / ><>2627.85< / ><>-< / ><>-15.53< / ><>1.81< / ><>4.39< / ><>8.93< / >< / ><><>Artemis 英国特殊情况 I 累积< / ><>1186.05< / ><>-< / ><>-11.68< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.79< / ><>13.45< / >< / ><><>Artemis 美国扩展阿尔法 I 累积< / ><>600.90< / ><>-< / ><>-5.09< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.62< / ><>18.59< / >< / ><><>Artemis 美国精选 I 累积< / ><>590.60< / ><>-< / ><>-5.83< / ><>0.00< / ><>21.00< / ><>21.92< / >< / ><><>Artemis 美国小型公司 I 累积< / ><>515.25< / ><>-< / ><>-8.91< / ><>0.00< / ><>20.33< / ><>19.53< / >< / table>

ASB Capital< / td>< / tr><>< colspan="7">Gate Village 5, Level 4, Unit 11, DIFC,Dubai United Arab Emirateswww.asbc.com< / >< / ><><>ASB SUKUK - ACC< / ><>$ 101.91< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB SUKUK - DIST< / ><>$ 94.08< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.50< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB State Street Global Equity< / ><>$ 125.11< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB Global Technology< / ><>$ 167.71< / ><>-< / ><>-1.72< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>ASB MENA Equity< / ><>$ 98.25< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>

ASB Capital

其他国际基金< / td>< / tr><><>American Dynamic< / ><>$ 9087.20< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>American One< / ><>$ 11100.38< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.41< / ><>14.22< / >< / ><><>Bond Global< / ><>€ 1646.01< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.73< / ><>6.90< / >< / ><><>Eurocroissance< / ><>€ 1311.23< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Far East< / ><>$ 1267.36< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / table>

7

CANDRIAM

Candriam 投资者集团< / td><>(卢森堡)< / >< / tr><>< colspan="9">经 FCA 认可< / >< / ><><> 绝对收益股票市场中性-C 累积型< / ><>€< / ><>222.49< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.21< / ><>2.87< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 欧元高收益债券累积型< / ><>€< / ><>1427.94< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.90< / ><>5.97< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 全球高收益债券 -C 累积型< / ><>€< / ><>284.09< / ><>-< / ><>-0.50< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.59< / ><>5.71< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 全球通胀挂钩短期债券-I-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>164.42< / ><>-< / ><>0.17< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.37< / ><>3.01< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 债券总回报-C-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>143.38< / ><>-< / ><>0.16< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.73< / ><>2.84< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 多元化期货-I-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>14366.83< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.43< / ><>-1.29< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 澳大利亚股票 L 累积型 A$< / ><>A$< / ><>2322.15< / ><>-< / ><>-28.13< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.81< / ><>8.34< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 新兴市场股票 L 累积型< / ><>€< / ><>1584.15< / ><>-< / ><>-26.05< / ><>0.00< / ><>27.77< / ><>21.76< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 生物技术股票 L-C-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>1303.21< / ><>-< / ><>2.47< / ><>0.00< / ><>23.20< / ><>23.33< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 欧洲创新股票 L-R-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>255.90< / ><>-< / ><>-0.46< / ><>0.00< / ><>-3.37< / ><>1.14< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 指数套利 -C-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>1532.00< / ><>-< / ><>0.81< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.16< / ><>2.25< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 多空信用 R-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>120.54< / ><>-< / ><>-0.02< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.99< / ><>3.84< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 风险套利-C-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>2775.19< / ><>-< / ><>-0.68< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.97< / ><>3.77< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 新兴市场可持续债券 I 分红型< / ><>€< / ><>748.47< / ><>-< / ><>-1.36< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.48< / ><>3.35< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 欧元公司可持续债券 R 累积型< / ><>€< / ><>110.12< / ><>-< / ><>-0.10< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.50< / ><>4.27< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 全球高收益可持续-I-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>1237.46< / ><>-< / ><>-1.80< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.98< / ><>4.78< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 循环经济股票-R-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>158.62< / ><>-< / ><>-1.60< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.22< / ><>6.18< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 气候行动股票 I-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>2145.95< / ><>-< / ><>-25.49< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.27< / ><>11.32< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 新兴市场可持续股票 C-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>193.23< / ><>-< / ><>-3.76< / ><>0.00< / ><>25.10< / ><>18.21< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 欧元区可持续股票-C-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>216.05< / ><>-< / ><>-3.38< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.17< / ><>9.57< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 欧洲中小盘可持续股票-I-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>2400.21< / ><>-< / ><>-36.81< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.38< / ><>1.86< / ><>< / >< / ><><> 全球可持续股票-C-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>48.07< / ><>-< / ><>0.08< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.07< / ><>14.27< / ><>< / >< / ><><>NYLIM GF 美国高收益公司债券-R-累积型< / ><>€< / ><>171.74< / ><>-< / ><>-0.14< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.36< / ><>7.10< / ><>< / >< / table>

其他国际基金< / td>< / tr><><>Candriam Bds Euro Sh.Term Cap< / ><>€< / ><>2180.87< / ><>-< / ><>1.08< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.08< / ><>2.86< / >< / ><><>Candriam Bonds Credit Opportunities< / ><>€< / ><>220.76< / ><>-< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.61< / ><>3.48< / >< / ><><>Candriam Bonds Emerg Mkt-C-Cap< / ><>$< / ><>2986.25< / ><>-< / ><>-8.57< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.44< / ><>9.61< / >< / ><><>Candriam Equities L Eurp Opt Olt -I-Cap< / ><>€< / ><>249.62< / ><>-< / ><>-1.62< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.61< / ><>6.40< / >< / ><><>Candriam Equities L Global Demg R Cap< / ><>€< / ><>405.30< / ><>-< / ><>-0.29< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.31< / ><>13.28< / >< / ><><>Candriam Equities Onco impt-I-Cap< / ><>$< / ><>3524.36< / ><>-< / ><>20.23< / ><>0.00< / ><>7.99< / ><>12.21< / >< / ><><>Candriam Equities L Robt&InnTech I Cap< / ><>$< / ><>8327.36< / ><>-< / ><>-75.80< / ><>0.00< / ><>32.27< / ><>28.83< / >< / table>

Dodge & Cox® 全球基金

<>< colspan="7">Cantab Asset Management Ltd(UK) 01223 522000 www.cantabam.com< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">英国金融行为监管局（FCA）认可< / >< / ><><>VT Cantab Balanced A GBP Acc< / ><>142.13< / ><>-< / ><>-0.33< / ><>1.80< / ><>9.90< / ><>9.30< / >< / ><><>VT Cantab Moderate A GBP Acc< / ><>139.49< / ><>-< / ><>-0.25< / ><>2.12< / ><>9.09< / ><>8.09< / >< / ><><>VT Cantab Sustainable Gbl Eq A GBP Acc< / ><>169.98< / ><>-< / ><>-0.12< / ><>1.37< / ><>8.80< / ><>9.07< / >< / table>

<><>Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds< / ><>(IRL)< / >< / ><><>48 49 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5JG< / ><>< / >< / ><><>www.dodgeandcox.com +44 0203 642 3370< / ><>< / >< / ><><>ECA 认可< / ><>< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-新兴市场股票基金< / >< / ><><>Emerging Markets Stock Fund A USD Acc< / ><>$< / ><>16.25< / ><>-< / ><>-0.14< / ><>0.00< / ><>26.07< / >< / ><><>Emerging Markets Stock Fund A GBP Acc< / ><>£< / ><>17.39< / ><>-< / ><>-0.07< / ><>0.00< / ><>24.11< / >< / ><><>Emerging Markets Stock Fund D GBP Dis< / ><>£< / ><>15.67< / ><>-< / ><>-0.06< / ><>1.69< / ><>21.49< / >< / ><><>Emerging Markets Stock Fund A EUR Acc< / ><>€< / ><>17.63< / ><>-< / ><>-0.06< / ><>1.51< / ><>24.28< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-全球债券基金< / >< / ><><>EUR Accumulating Class< / ><>€< / ><>18.43< / ><>-< / ><>0.10< / ><>0.00< / ><>3.41< / ><>4.17< / >< / ><><>EUR Accumulating Class (H)< / ><>€< / ><>11.89< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.89< / ><>3.51< / >< / ><><>EUR Distributing Class< / ><>€< / ><>11.22< / ><>-< / ><>0.06< / ><>0.00< / ><>-1.55< / ><>-0.73< / >< / ><><>EUR Distributing Class (H)< / ><>€< / ><>7.18< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.05< / ><>-2.11< / ><>-1.37< / >< / ><><>GBP Distributing Class< / ><>£< / ><>11.65< / ><>-< / ><>0.05< / ><>4.75< / ><>-1.74< / ><>-1.41< / >< / ><><>GBP Distributing Class (H)< / ><>£< / ><>8.15< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.70< / ><>-0.26< / ><>0.18< / >< / ><><>USD Accumulating Class< / ><>$< / ><>14.89< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.88< / ><>5.50< / >< / ><><>CHF Distributing Class (H)< / ><>Sfr< / ><>7.30< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>-4.47< / ><>-3.86< / >< / table>

Dodge & Cox 全球基金-全球股票基金< / td>< / tr><><>美元累积份额类< / ><>$< / ><>48.19< / ><>-< / ><>-0.45< / ><>0.00< / ><>13.46< / ><>15.84< / >< / ><><>英镑累积份额类< / ><>£< / ><>59.99< / ><>-< / ><>-0.27< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.69< / ><>13.68< / >< / ><><>英镑分红份额类< / ><>£< / ><>38.35< / ><>-< / ><>-0.17< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.04< / ><>12.05< / >< / ><><>欧元累积份额类< / ><>€< / ><>64.65< / ><>-< / ><>-0.23< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.71< / ><>13.18< / >< / ><><>英镑分红份额类 (H)< / ><>£< / ><>20.71< / ><>-< / ><>-0.19< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.44< / ><>13.52< / >< / ><><>美元分红类< / ><>$< / ><>19.68< / ><>-< / ><>-0.18< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.91< / ><>14.24< / >< / ><><>加元累积类< / ><>C$< / ><>64.85< / ><>-< / ><>-0.38< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.48< / ><>17.49< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">Dodge & Cox 全球基金-美国股票基金< / >< / ><><>美元累积份额类< / ><>$< / ><>58.23< / ><>-< / ><>-0.34< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.80< / ><>14.05< / >< / ><><>英镑累积份额类< / ><>£< / ><>68.56< / ><>-< / ><>-0.06< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.08< / ><>11.93< / >< / ><><>英镑分红份额类< / ><>£< / ><>39.89< / ><>-< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.24< / ><>11.03< / >< / ><><>欧元累积份额类< / ><>€< / ><>67.44< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>8.37< / ><>12.17< / >< / ><><>英镑分红份额类 (H)< / ><>£< / ><>21.97< / ><>-< / ><>-0.13< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.43< / ><>12.58< / >< / ><><>美元分红类< / ><>$< / ><>21.30< / ><>-< / ><>-0.13< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.95< / ><>13.10< / >< / table>

管理基金服务

SICO Capital KSA 授权公司董事-Waystone Management (UK) Limited

基金< / td><>买入价< / ><>卖出价 + / -< / ><>收益率< / ><>24个月< / ><>36个月< / >< / tr>< / table>

Fundsmith LLP (1200)F PO Box 10846, Chelmsford Essex CM99 2BW 0330 123 1815 www.fundsmith.co.uk, enquiries@.co.uk

<>< colspan="7">授权投资基金< / >< / ><><> Equity T Acc< / ><>710.66< / ><>-< / ><>-3.61< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.74< / ><>4.20< / >< / ><><> Equity T Inc< / ><>641.41< / ><>-< / ><>-3.26< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.09< / ><>13.49< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="8">Guinness Global Investors< / >< / ><><>Guinness Global Equity Income Y GBP Dis< / ><>£< / ><>24.70< / ><>-< / ><>-0.08< / ><>2.05< / ><>8.79< / ><>11.42< / >< / ><><>Guinness Global Innovators Y GBP ACC< / ><>£< / ><>49.41< / ><>-< / ><>-0.05< / ><>0.00< / ><>13.54< / ><>16.82< / >< / ><><>Guinness Global Quality Mid Cap Y Gbp Acc< / ><>£< / ><>16.39< / ><>-< / ><>-0.22< / ><>0.00< / ><>12.84< / ><>11.97< / >< / table>

McInroy & Wood Portfolios Limited Easter Alderston, Haddington EH41 3SF 01620 825867

<>< colspan="6">授权投资基金< / >< / ><><>Balanced Fund Acc< / ><>6925.70< / ><>-21.30< / ><>1.86< / ><>4.15< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Balanced Fund Inc< / ><>6501.40< / ><>-20.00< / ><>1.90< / ><>2.28< / ><>2.41< / >< / ><><>Emerging Markets Fund ACC< / ><>2338.30< / ><>-10.20< / ><>1.74< / ><>2.48< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Emerging Markets Fund Inc< / ><>2094.40< / ><>-9.20< / ><>1.78< / ><>0.55< / ><>-1.72< / >< / ><><>Income Fund Acc< / ><>3594.10< / ><>-14.50< / ><>2.73< / ><>6.27< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Income Fund Inc< / ><>3166.90< / ><>-12.80< / ><>2.83< / ><>3.05< / ><>3.11< / >< / ><><>Smaller Companies Fund Acc< / ><>7188.10< / ><>-102.20< / ><>1.28< / ><>3.91< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Smaller Companies Fund Inc< / ><>6731.80< / ><>-95.70< / ><>1.31< / ><>2.57< / ><>3.23< / >< / table>

HPB Assurance Ltd

司法部共同投资基金< / td><>(英国)< / >< / tr><>< colspan="6">房地产及其他英国单位信托< / >< / ><><>The Equity Idx Tracker Fd Inc< / ><>2628.00< / ><>-< / ><>-22.00< / ><>2.00< / ><>10.03< / >< / ><><>分配单位< / ><>< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">国际保险< / >< / ><><>Holiday Property Bond Ser 1< / ><>£< / ><>0.49< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.28< / >< / ><><>Holiday Property Bond Ser 2< / ><>£< / ><>0.66< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.43< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="6">Purisima Investment Fds (CI) Ltd< / ><>(泽西岛)< / >< / ><><>受监管< / ><>< / >< / ><><>PCG B< / ><>572.11< / ><>-< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.87< / ><>19.99< / >< / ><><>PCG C< / ><>551.88< / ><>-< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.61< / ><>19.72< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">授权公司董事-Waystone Management (UK) Limited< / >< / ><><>Global Total Fd PCG A< / ><>711.25< / ><>-< / ><>-3.94< / ><>0.41< / ><>14.69< / ><>18.05< / >< / ><><>Global Total Fd PCG B< / ><>700.12< / ><>-< / ><>-3.88< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.60< / ><>17.98< / >< / ><><>Global Total Fd PCG INT< / ><>682.71< / ><>-< / ><>-3.80< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.42< / ><>17.79< / >< / table>

Royal London 伦敦 Fenchurch Street 80号, EC3M 4BY

<><>Royal London Sustainable Diversified A Inc< / ><>286.10< / ><>-< / ><>-1.70< / ><>1.55< / ><>4.47< / ><>6.02< / >< / ><><>Royal London Sustainable World A Inc< / ><>524.50< / ><>-< / ><>-2.80< / ><>0.71< / ><>11.99< / ><>12.54< / >< / ><><>Royal London Corporate Bond Mth Income< / ><>74.85< / ><>-< / ><>-0.20< / ><>4.64< / ><>-0.81< / ><>0.46< / >< / ><><>Royal London European Growth Trust< / ><>280.20< / ><>-< / ><>-3.00< / ><>1.15< / ><>8.16< / ><>8.98< / >< / ><><>Royal London Sustainable Leaders A Inc< / ><>985.50< / ><>-< / ><>-5.00< / ><>1.50< / ><>6.38< / ><>6.46< / >< / ><><>Royal London UK Growth Trust< / ><>843.70< / ><>-< / ><>-5.00< / ><>1.73< / ><>9.27< / ><>9.60< / >< / ><><>Royal London UK Income With Growth Trust< / ><>249.10< / ><>-< / ><>-0.90< / ><>4.07< / ><>6.01< / ><>6.77< / >< / ><><>Royal London US Growth Trust< / ><>681.90< / ><>-< / ><>-2.60< / ><>0.01< / ><>15.48< / ><>18.14< / >< / table>

可用其他基金 详情请参阅 www.royallondon.com

<><>SF Global Best Ideas Eq B USD Acc< / ><>$< / ><>299.52< / ><>-< / ><>-1.43< / ><>0.00< / ><>4.27< / ><>6.31< / >< / ><><>SF Global Best Ideas Eq D GBP Inc< / ><>£< / ><>343.76< / ><>-< / ><>-0.12< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.64< / ><>4.33< / >< / table>

Superfund Asset Management GmbH www.superfund.com, +43 (1) 247 00

Janus Henderson 投资者

Stonehage Fleming Investment Management Ltd< / td><>(IRL)< / >< / tr><><>www.stonehagefleming.com / gbi enquiries@stonehagefleming.com< / ><>< / >< / table>

<><>Superfund Trend Gold< / ><>$ 1814.43< / ><>-< / ><>-21.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>31.23< / ><>31.13< / >< / ><><>Superfund Trend Silver< / ><>$ 1940.83< / ><>-< / ><>-42.63< / ><>0.00< / ><>47.57< / ><>42.07< / >< / ><><>Superfund Trend< / ><>$ 817.82< / ><>-< / ><>-0.34< / ><>0.00< / ><>14.18< / ><>8.06< / >< / ><><>Superfund Bitcoin 0-2x< / ><>€ 95.99< / ><>-< / ><>1.07< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.72< / ><>15.41< / >< / ><><>Superfund Fund-of-Funds< / ><>$ 170.73< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>21.89< / ><>20.71< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">Nutshell Asset Management Ltd< / ><>(IRL)< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">Nutshell Asset Management Ltd, Ivybridge House, 1-5 Adam Street, London WC2N 6LEwww.nutshellam.com< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">授权投资资金< / >< / ><><>Nutshell Growth Fund Gbp Inst Founder< / ><>£< / ><>193.29< / ><>-< / ><>-0.53< / ><>0.00< / ><>16.03< / ><>17.23< / >< / table>

Ruffer LLP (1000) F

<><>Superfund Blockchain< / ><>€< / ><>24.65< / ><>-< / ><>0.05< / ><>0.00< / ><>18.89< / ><>33.72< / >< / ><><>Superfund Gold Silver + Mining< / ><>€< / ><>19.33< / ><>-< / ><>0.08< / ><>0.00< / ><>26.30< / ><>27.06< / >< / ><><>Superfund Quadriga All Seasons< / ><>€< / ><>15.00< / ><>-< / ><>0.07< / ><>0.00< / ><>15.50< / ><>17.24< / >< / ><><>Superfund Inflation< / ><>Sfr< / ><>11.27< / ><>-< / ><>0.04< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.02< / ><>8.25< / >< / table>

Ruffer LLP (1000) F 3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL 订单台与查询：0345 601 9610

<>< colspan="7">Private Fund Mgrs (Guernsey) Ltd< / ><>(GSY)< / >< / ><>< colspan="8">受监管< / >< / ><><>Monument Growth 06 / 10 / 2026< / ><>£< / ><>612.77< / ><>618.47< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.05< / ><>3.09< / ><>2.98< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">受监管< / >< / ><><>Oasis Crescent Global Eq Fd (USD) A (Dist)< / ><>$< / ><>56.09< / ><>-< / ><>-0.43< / ><>0.00< / ><>17.96< / >< / ><><>Oasis Crescent Global Inc Fd (USD) A Dist< / ><>$< / ><>9.95< / ><>-< / ><>-0.01< / ><>0.00< / ><>-0.65< / >< / ><><>Oasis Crescent Low Equity Fund (USD) D Dist< / ><>$< / ><>15.91< / ><>-< / ><>-0.11< / ><>0.00< / ><>9.24< / >< / ><><>Oasis Crescent Med Equity Fd (USD) A Dist< / ><>$< / ><>18.62< / ><>-< / ><>-0.16< / ><>0.00< / ><>11.27< / >< / ><><>Oasis Crescent Prop Equity Fd (USD) A Dist< / ><>$< / ><>10.14< / ><>-< / ><>-0.13< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.84< / >< / ><><>Oasis Crescent Short Term Inc Fd (USD) A (Dist)< / ><>$< / ><>0.95< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>0.37< / >< / ><><>Oasis Crescent Variable Fund (USD) A (Dist)< / ><>£< / ><>12.09< / ><>-< / ><>-0.07< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.87< / >< / table>

授权投资资金

授权公司董事 - Waystone Management (UK) Limited< / td>< / tr><><>WS Ruffer Total Return C Acc< / ><>587.10< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.16< / ><>4.90< / ><>4.23< / >< / ><><>WS Ruffer Total Return C Inc< / ><>338.68< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>2.19< / ><>1.76< / ><>0.57< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="6">SICO BSC BHR电话 - 973 1751 570.76网站 - www.sicobank.com< / ><>(BHR)< / >< / ><><>Khaleej Equity Fund< / ><>$< / ><>570.76< / ><>-< / ><>-33.51< / ><>0.00< / ><>-3.81< / >< / ><><>Sico Gulf Equity Fund< / ><>$< / ><>202.34< / ><>-< / ><>3.72< / ><>0.00< / ><>10.57< / >< / table>

<>< colspan="7">SICO Capital KSA< / >< rowspan="2">(KSA)< / >< / ><>< colspan="7">电话 - 966 11 521 3835网站 - www.sicocapital.com< / >< / ><><>SICO Kingdom Equity Fund< / ><>SAR< / ><>10.28< / ><>-< / ><>-0.39< / ><>0.00< / ><>1.39< / ><>-< / >< / ><><>SICO MENA Equity Fund< / ><>SAR< / ><>21.34< / ><>-< / ><>-0.39< / ><>0.00< / ><>-1.37< / ><>4.80< / >< / ><><>SICO Capital Money Market< / ><>SAR< / ><>14.02< / ><>-< / ><>-0.15< / ><>0.00< / ><>-< / >< / table>

Troy Asset Management (1200)

3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL 订单台及查询 0345 608 0950

<>< colspan="7">Trojan Investment Funds< / >< / ><><>Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Acc< / ><>110.02< / ><>-< / ><>-0.27< / ><>3.09< / ><>-2.03< / ><>2.86< / >< / ><><>Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Inc< / ><>96.89< / ><>-< / ><>-0.24< / ><>3.15< / ><>-3.45< / ><>-0.33< / >< / ><><>Trojan Ethical O Acc< / ><>157.52< / ><>-< / ><>-0.04< / ><>0.68< / ><>7.54< / ><>7.69< / >< / ><><>Trojan Ethical O Inc< / ><>152.07< / ><>-< / ><>-0.03< / ><>0.68< / ><>5.36< / ><>6.32< / >< / ><><>Trojan Ethical Income O Acc< / ><>165.42< / ><>-< / ><>0.13< / ><>2.62< / ><>3.73< / ><>6.52< / >< / ><><>Trojan Ethical Income O Inc< / ><>124.47< / ><>-< / ><>0.09< / ><>2.71< / ><>0.99< / ><>3.70< / >< / ><><>Trojan Fund Acc< / ><>460.95< / ><>-< / ><>0.06< / ><>0.81< / ><>7.02< / ><>6.77< / >< / ><><>Trojan Fund Inc< / ><>360.98< / ><>-< / ><>0.06< / ><>0.89< / ><>7.54< / ><>5.01< / >< / ><><>Trojan Global Income O Acc< / ><>169.61< / ><>-< / ><>-0.06< / ><>3.42< / ><>1.03< / ><>3.50< / >< / ><><>Trojan Global Income O Inc< / ><>125.92< / ><>-< / ><>-0.03< / ><>3.50< / ><>-2.11< / ><>0.27< / >< / ><><>Trojan Income O Acc< / ><>389.59< / ><>-< / ><>0.16< / ><>2.85< / ><>3.86< / ><>6.15< / >< / ><><>Trojan Income O Inc< / ><>171.65< / ><>-< / ><>0.07< / ><>2.96< / ><>-0.53< / ><>2.15< / >< / table>

<><>Troy Asset Management (1100)< / ><>(IRL)< / >< / ><><>Kilmore House, Spencer Dock, North Wall Quay, Dublin 1, D01 YE64, Ireland 查询 353 (0) 1672 1600< / ><>< / >< / ><><>FCA 认可基金< / ><>< / >< / table>

管理公司 - Universal Investment Ireland

<>< colspan="7">Trojan Funds (Ireland) Plc< / >< / ><><>Trojan Europe O EUR Acc< / ><>€< / ><>1.0205< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / >< / ><><>Trojan Exclusions X GBP Acc< / ><>£< / ><>1.3176< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>6.58< / >< / ><><>Trojan Global Equity O GBP Acc< / ><>£< / ><>5.9603< / ><>-< / ><>0.01< / ><>0.20< / ><>-0.50< / >< / ><><>Trojan (Ireland) O GBP Acc< / ><>£< / ><>1.8517< / ><>-< / ><>0.00< / ><>5.62< / >< / table>

FT 基金数据指南

本页所引用的基金价格由基金运营方、基金管理人和基金行政管理人提供。本页公布的基金详情（包括价格）仅用于信息参考，且仅应作为指南使用。金融时报有限公司（The Financial Times Limited）对其准确性或完整性不作任何陈述，在做出投资决策时不得依赖这些数据。在某些司法管辖区，法律可能会限制销售本页所列基金的权益，且这些基金并不一定面向本出版物发行的所有司法管辖区的人员开放。如有疑问，请寻求适当的专业建议。数据由 ICE 汇总。本期公布的基金价格及附加信息也可在金融时报网站 www.ft.com / funds 上获取。本页公布的基金按基金管理公司分组。除非另有说明，价格单位为便士。如果显示变动，则为相对于前次引用数值的变动（并非所有基金每天更新价格）。标记为 \$ 且无前缀的指美元。收益率百分比（在周二至周六的报纸中）已计入购买费用。

某些较旧的保险挂钩计划的价格在出售时可能需缴纳资本利得税。

OEIC：开放式投资公司。类似于单位信托，但采用公司结构而非信托结构。发行不同的股份类别以反映不同的货币、收费结构或持有者类型。 买入价（Bid price）：也称为售价。投资者出售单位信托份额的价格。 卖出价（Offer）：也称为买价。投资者购买单位信托份额的价格。包含管理人的初始费用。 单一价格（Single）：基于底层投资的中端市场估值。OEIC 股份和单一价格单位信托份额的买入和卖出价格相同。管理人的定期资本费用处理：24 和 36 个月：使用该期间的总收益（或损失）计算 24 和 36 个月的年化业绩数据。业绩计算公式已根据参考期间内的收益分配进行了调整。 收益率（Yield）：使用基金的预计年收入除以最新的可用净资产值计算。

报纸上出现的价格是管理人 / 运营方提供的最新价格。 此广告服务的费用基于公布的行数和基金的分类。欲了解更多信息，请联系 data@ft.com。其他查询请联系 newspapers@ice.com

数据提供方：

透明度。探索。创新。

市场与数据在此汇聚。

新修复的棕榈温室为爱丁堡提供一片宁静绿洲

娜塔莉·托马斯（Nathalie Thomas）表示，这座建筑奇迹是皇家植物园的亮点，也是生物多样性的避风港

在爱丁堡皇家植物园（RBGE）新修复的棕榈温室（Palm Houses）中，600 种植物标本中的每一种都有一个非凡的故事。

以狮子草（Lion's plant，学名 Valdivia gayana）为例。它的叶子看起来与普通的报春花相似，但这种开着鲜艳粉色花朵的多年生植物在其原产地智利已濒临灭绝，植物学家们从该国一个洞穴的单一表面上采集了其种子。RBGE 的皇家管理员朱莉娅·奈茨（Julia Knights）教授表示，这些种子被带到爱丁堡并进行了“大规模”繁殖，随后部分种子被送回智利，以增加该国其他地区的狮子草种群数量。

“这是我们所有团队成员在世界各地为拯救植物而开展的保护工作的一个缩影，”奈茨说道。在这座 19 世纪的棕榈温室中，她将这种“不起眼”的小植物列为她最喜欢的植物之一。

棕榈温室是 RBGE 的亮点之一。这座占地 70 英亩的花园其历史可追溯到 350 多年前，长期以来一直是当地居民和苏格兰首都市访客的最爱。

这座花园位于市中心以北一英里处，夏季的访客数量尤为众多，因为这里的宁静为人们在爱丁堡著名的艺术节那欢乐的喧嚣中提供了一个受欢迎的喘息之所。

“棕榈温室”这个名字略有误导。是的，这里有许多壮丽的棕榈树努力向上生长，试图触及 A 级保护的玻璃和铁制天顶，其最高点接近 22 米，使其成为世界上最高的石材与玻璃结构建筑之一。但在这座光线充足、宛如大教堂般的结构之下，还安置着蕨类、海棠、针叶树甚至地钱，每一种都有其独特的魅力。

例如，就在距离狮子草仅几米的地方，有一棵来自南太平洋新喀里多尼亚的深绿色库克松（Cook pine），这是一种具有针状叶的针叶树，它向赤道方向生长，而非向着光线生长。

“据我们所知（在科学界），这是唯一一种向赤道方向生长的植物，这相当有趣，”奈茨说，“我们称它为‘歪脖子树’，因为它生长的方向很不寻常。”

总计来自 35 个以上国家的植物被安置在棕榈温室中，而温室本身也有一段相当传奇的故事。

最初 RBGE 有两座棕榈温室，在经过艰苦的五年修复后，现在被整合为一座建筑。最初的八角形结构可追溯到 1834 年。第二座更高的结构于 1858 年完工，当时维多利亚时代的人们对蕨类植物极为痴迷——这种时尚如此盛行，以至于维多利亚时代的小说家查尔斯·金斯利（Charles Kingsley）创造了“蕨类狂热”（pteridomania）这个词。

在棕榈温室中漫步，很容易理解为什么维多利亚时代的人们如此痴迷于蕨类植物：那些近乎外星生物般、紧紧卷曲的叶片，与异域风情且优雅的棕榈树形成了有趣的对比。

RBGE 拥有世界上领先的蕨类植物收藏之一。RBGE 的温室策展人塞迪·巴（Sadie Bar-）表示，自从维多利亚时代流行巅峰以来，蕨类植物往往被“边缘化”，而开花植物则更受欢迎。

植物大教堂：爱丁堡拥有世界上最高的石材与玻璃结构建筑之一 —— RBGE

FT 全球旅行者：涵盖咖啡、鸡尾酒、权力晚餐、跑步、健身课程、绿色出行等更多内容。

然而，现在它们“正被认可为一组真正重要的植物”。

蕨类植物通过微小的孢子而非种子进行繁殖，它们不仅被认为是天然的空气净化器，而且也是伟大的生存者。有化石证据表明，蕨类家族的成员早在 3.6 亿 年前就已存在。

“因为它们只是地里的孢子，无论地球发生什么，蕨类植物都能重新生长，”巴伯补充道。

在棕榈温室（Palm Houses）的修复过程中，有 5,000 多块玻璃被更换，而大部分铁件和砂岩由于随时间风化以及遭受风暴破坏，必须进行修复或更换。

另一项艰巨的任务是搬迁所有植物——最初共有 800 株标本——并将它们临时安置在附近的玻璃房中，以便进行施工。业余园丁们一定很熟悉这种挫败感：搬迁健康的植物，结果却发现它们在没有明显原因的情况下在新环境中枯萎。而这次任务则是将同样的操作在巨大的规模上实施一遍。

当被问及搬迁事宜时，园艺总监大卫·诺特（David Knott）表示：“我们是[这些植物的]守护者，这是一项相当沉重的责任。”

并非每株植物都成功存活。其中最令人惋惜的是棕榈温室最著名的前居民：一株 200 年树龄的墨西哥萨巴尔棕榈（Sabal mexicana），它曾高耸至屋顶，但因过于高大且年迈而无法搬迁。幸运的是，墨西哥萨巴尔棕榈是一个相当常见的棕榈品种。对那棵老树怀有深厚感情的游客现在可以看到它 10 岁的后代。

其他一些植物被刻意没有迁回，以便为那些迁回的植物以及游客提供更多的空间和光线。

爱丁堡皇家植物园（RBGE）成立于 1670 年，最初是一座“药用”花园，用于种植外科医生和医学生所需的植物。如今，在更广阔的花园中，保护、韧性以及气候变化的主题随处可见。花园中特意保留了一棵曾经高达 30 米的喜马拉雅雪松的残骸，它在 2025 年 1 月被一场剧烈风暴吹倒之前，曾是爱丁堡最高的树。其效果震撼人心：它像一座幽灵图腾，依然笼罩在整个场地上空。

RBGE 的工作人员认为，在气温升高导致某些物种在其他地方濒危的情况下，该花园在保护这些物种方面可以发挥尤为重要的作用。

在阴风凛冽、寒冷多雨的日子里，游客可能不这么认为，但正如奈茨（Knights）所说：“我们在苏格兰真的很幸运。我们拥有如此绝佳的气候，夏天这里不会太热。”

下一个等待翻新的将是研究玻璃房，那里收藏了大量物种，包括杜鹃花、姜科植物和石楠花——这些都是 RBGE 的其他专业领域。

这里也是 120 名左右的科学家在幕后工作的地方，他们努力确保某些濒危物种的故事尚未结束，并不断发现关于其他物种的新信息。

回到棕榈温室，一盆来自南非、开着精致白花的德雷格秋海棠（Begonia dregei）的叶子正由绿转为淡红。

“我们的科学家已经鉴定出 100 多个新物种[的秋海棠]，且数量还在增加，”奈茨说道，她称秋海棠的故事是“最令[她]心动”的。

“我们正在进行大量的 DNA 分析，试图理解关于秋海棠的一个特定问题，即为什么有些只有指甲盖那么大，而有些却像汽车轮胎那么大？为什么即使在形状和尺寸上也会有这样的生物多样性？”

“我们失去[某些]植物的速度如此之快，而我们尚未掌握关于它们的所有知识，这就是为什么这些问题如此重要，”她补充道。

RBGE 每日开放（12 月 25 日和 1 月 1 日除外），上午 10 点开始营业；闭馆时间随季节而定。入园免费，但建议提前预约参观新的棕榈温室。棕榈温室的成人票价为 £4.95，若包含捐款则为 £5.50。

该俱乐部的非凡崛起揭露了体育、政治与国际投资之间日益紧密的纠葛——这一转型始于 2008 年的收购。作者：乔什·诺布尔（Josh Noble）和阿拉什·马苏迪（Arash Massoudi）

曼城、阿布扎比与足球的未来

在2023年初英超联赛指控曼城足球俱乐部违反财务规则超过100项仅数小时后，该俱乐部的主席在日程表上标注了一个重要的日期。

哈尔多恩·穆巴拉克（Khaldoon al-Mubarak）同时也是阿布扎比主权投资基金穆巴达拉（Mubadala）的首席执行官，他原定会见时任英国财政大臣的杰里米·亨特（Jeremy Hunt）。这次会面是为了在前首相利兹·特拉斯（Liz Truss）那场未经资金支持的“迷你预算”灾难发生不到五个月后，重建信心的更广泛努力的一部分。

财政部官员在开始时指出，应避免讨论足球话题。但据两名知情人士透露，穆巴拉克因对俱乐部受到的对待感到不满，无论如何还是提出了这一话题。其中一人补充道，他将其描述为一次由不受监管的卡特尔对阿布扎比重要资产的攻击，是对该酋长国一些最受尊敬公司的侮辱。

亨特强调英超联赛是独立的，并将对话转向投资。但穆巴拉克尖锐的评论表明，这两个问题并非能轻易分开。国家事务与足球俱乐部的事务混在一起，表明了曼城由国家支持的所有权在多大程度上改变了这项运动，这不仅影响到比赛规则，还影响到国际关系和投资。

在上周一份关于该俱乐部财务惯例的谴责性报告出炉后，英国政府正寻求在保护英国机构独立性的同时，与该国在阿拉伯世界最重要的盟友之一维持良好关系。

“只要有巨额资金，就会出现巨大的问题。现在的问题是：曼城是否‘大到不能倒’？”

“关于所有权以及这项运动在过去20年左右发展方式的整个问题现在都摆在桌面上了，”曼城前主席大卫·伯恩斯坦（David Bernstein）表示。“只要有巨额资金，就会出现巨大的问题。现在的问题是：曼城是否‘大到不能倒’？”

自2008年以来，曼城一直由阿布扎比皇室成员谢赫·曼苏尔（Sheikh Mansour）拥有，现在已成为一个在全球拥有12家俱乐部的足球帝国的核心。

在资金的推动下，这支球队打破了该运动既有精英阶层的垄断，并创造了英格兰足球一些最令人难忘的时刻，例如2011-2012赛季戏剧性的收官之战，当时阿根廷前锋塞尔希奥·阿圭罗（Sergio Agüero）在最后一刻的进球确保了曼城第1个英超冠军。

该俱乐部成为了一个更广泛的由阿布扎比主导的再生项目的锚定投资，该项目通过新建住房、办公空间和娱乐设施，帮助改造了曼彻斯特一个曾不受欢迎的区域。曼城被中央政府以及该市前市长、现任英国首相安迪·伯纳姆（Andy Burnham）推崇为外国投资的模板。

谢赫·曼苏尔收购曼城也是全球体育的一个分水岭时刻。它预示了一个新时代的到来，在这个时代，各国（尤其是海湾国家）将体育作为展示软实力的平台。在随后的几年里，卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯都购买了足球俱乐部，在一级方程式赛车（Formula 1）赛道上与阿布扎比同行，与球队和联赛签署了数百项赞助协议，并获得了国际足联世界杯的主办权。过去四场欧冠决赛中有三场由海湾资金支持的球队获胜。但曼城在2012年的史诗级胜利——以及随后的多次冠军和杯赛胜利——现在被体育史上最大的作弊丑闻之一所玷污。上周一份独立委员会的报告发现，曼城在2009-2018,年期间使用“虚假”合同来虚增收入并降低成本超过£900，以便在球员上的支出远超允许范围。如果该俱乐部遵守规则，阿圭罗可能永远不会出现在球场上，曼城也可能永远无法成为冠军。

他信在泰国的法律问题升级，一年后该俱乐部便被挂牌出售。两名经纪人介入其中：英国金融家阿曼达·斯塔夫利（Amanda Staveley）和苏莱曼·法希姆（Sulaiman al-Fahim）。后者是一位来自阿联酋的房地产和媒体大亨，以花花公子式的生活方式著称，开着奢华的跑车，并与帕梅拉·安德森（Pamela Anderson）等名流交往。两人安排将俱乐部出售给阿布扎比皇室高级成员谢赫·曼苏尔（Sheikh Mansour），这笔交易在2008.年9月雷曼兄弟崩溃仅三天后最终敲定。一个月后，斯塔夫利正忙于谈判一项规模大得多的交易，由于这家英国银行急于避免由纳税人出资救助，阿布扎比投资者将向巴克莱银行（Barclays）注资超过30亿英镑。在全球金融危机肆虐之际，海湾主权基金势头强劲，将资金注入陷入困境的银行和其他实体。

据当时参与人员透露，英超联赛批准新所有者的流程始于向英国外交部和商务部致电，询问潜在买家是否能获得在该国投资的许可。在谢赫·曼苏尔的案例中，由戈登·布朗（Gordon Brown）领导的工党政府——其中包括商务大臣彼得·曼德尔森（Peter Mandelson）以及当时年轻的文化、媒体与体育大臣伯纳姆（Burnham）——给出了肯定的答复。

英国已成为全球资本的热门目的地。同样参与巴克莱救助计划的卡塔尔主权财富基金在年前已在超市连锁店赛恩斯伯里（Sainsbury's）建立了大量持股，并投资于碎片大厦（The Shard）等标志性资产，后者是该市最高的建筑。足球同样具有吸引力，俄罗斯寡头罗曼·阿布拉莫维奇（Roman Abramovich）在2003年买下了切尔西，格雷泽家族（Glazer family）在2005年收购了曼联。

“英超联赛的态度是，任何有钱的人都欢——”

哈尔多恩·穆巴拉克（Khaldoon al-Mubarak）和谢赫·曼苏尔助力曼城开启了国家支持的所有权时代 Rory Griffiths / FT 蒙太奇 / 盖蒂图片社

“关于是否应该允许国家支持的所有者进入，俱乐部内部从未有过争论，”一名足球高管表示，“回过头来看，我们是否忽略了一些事情？绝对是的。”

“——迎。寡头、主权财富、国家——尽管进来吧，”该足球高管说，“这个国家的文化就是张开双臂欢迎他们，而足球反映了国家的现状。”

阿联酋首都阿布扎比管理着近$2tn的主权投资基金，一直坚称曼城的交易是一次私人交易。

但随着谢赫·曼苏尔对俱乐部的所有权让这个传统上保守且注重形象的酋长国受到更多审视（其中大部分是不受欢迎的），法希姆被推到一边，而阿布扎比最高级别的官员之一穆巴拉克被引入来监督该项目。

法希姆后来在阿联酋因从妻子那里窃取£5mn用于购买朴茨茅斯足球俱乐部而被监禁。他在2009.年夏天仅拥有该俱乐部六周时间。在2010,年初，该俱乐部进入破产管理程序。

尽管在就任主席时年仅三十出头，但穆巴拉克已是一颗冉冉升起的新星，也是阿布扎比最有权势的非皇室成员之一，管理着数十亿加元的投资组合。他还是谢赫·穆罕默德·本·扎耶德·阿尔纳哈扬（Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan）信任的副手，后者当时是该酋长国的王储，被称为MBZ，并正推动该小国的雄心勃勃的发展计划。足球开启了新篇章。“我们将此视为一项稳健的商业投资，”谢赫·曼苏尔写道，“即便如此，我们明白我们需要投入资金，才能让俱乐部达到我们认为它能够达到的高度。”

巨额资金的接管

这家俱乐部迅速成为了管理精心打造的阿布扎比品牌的关键项目。此次交易恰逢 MBZ 推出一项耗资数十亿美元的发展计划，其中包括一场一级方程式大奖赛以及卢浮宫和古根海姆博物馆的分馆。曼城的许多赞助商，包括阿提哈德航空和电信公司 Etisalat，要么是国有的，要么由王室成员担任主席的国家基金持有。投资也开始流入曼彻斯特东部，助力该市成为伦敦以外英国最顶尖的外商直接投资目的地。自接管以来，曼城的母公司表示已向该地区投入超过 10亿英镑，用于建设公寓楼、办公空间和一个新的现场音乐场馆。这项投资有助于塑造曼彻斯特作为经济引擎的形象，并成为一个可以在全国范围内复制的模板——这一理念助力伯纳姆一路走到了唐宁街。

在幕后，曼城的管理层很早就意识到，该项目所需的资金将超过预期。独立委员会上周的报告指出，到 2009 年底，俱乐部发现通过赞助产生收入比预期“更具挑战性”，并且预计在未来几年将出现重大亏损。

舞弊开始

关于报告英格兰足球历史上最大年度亏损的问题，存在特定的担忧。如果该俱乐部要坚持其支出计划，将需要其所有者提供“极其巨额的资金”，但这将违反欧足联（Uefa）即将实施的支出规则。

曼城传统上是曼彻斯特规模较小且不那么受欢迎的球队。这种情况在 2006 年泰国发生军事政变、总理他信·西那瓦被推翻并流亡后发生了变化。2007 年，他买下了曼城。由于球迷难以读出他的名字，便亲切地称他为“弗兰克·辛纳屈”。

委员会发现，在 2010 年初，俱乐部高管设计了一套“伪装资金方案”，使俱乐部所有者的股权支付在账目中显示为赞助商收入。委员会发现，在 2009 年至 2018 年期间，曼城报告的商业收入为 £950mn。但其中仅有 £119.25mn 实际上是由赞助商支付的。

曼城高管一直坚决否认任何违规行为。俱乐部上周针对委员会的调查结果提起上诉，并誓言将采取一切法律手段来洗清名誉。俱乐部表示：“俱乐部的坚定立场是，基于多项理由，该意见在法律、原则和事实上包含明显的重大错误，且不可靠。”

自收购后不久起，关于其财务状况的质疑就一直困扰着该俱乐部。2009 年，时任阿森纳主教练阿尔塞纳·温格首次指责曼城进行“财务兴奋剂”操作，并在 2011 年呼吁欧足联调查该俱乐部的赞助协议。

然而，曼城项目曾受到英国政府的认可。在俱乐部新青训学院的开幕式上，时任财政大臣乔治·奥斯本将曼彻斯特市议会与谢赫·曼苏尔的投资工具——阿布扎比联合集团（Abu Dhabi United Group）之间的关系描述为“公私合作伙伴关系的基准”。

曼城的所有者还开始在体育领域扩张，收购西班牙、澳大利亚和美国的球队，组建了后来的城市足球集团（City Football Group），投资范围涵盖十多家俱乐部。

2018 年，围绕曼城的传闻终于爆发，原因是葡萄牙黑客鲁伊·平托（Rui Pinto）获取了俱乐部董事会成员兼穆巴拉克顾问西蒙·皮尔斯（Simon Pearce）发送的电子邮件。平托将这些邮件分享给了德国杂志《镜报》（Der Spiegel），随后该杂志发表了一系列文章，指称该俱乐部夸大了赞助收入并隐藏了款项。高管之间的电子邮件还暗示了一种不受惩罚的文化，以及一种认为规则并不适用的心态。

欧足联启动了另一项调查，并在 2020 年禁止曼城参加欧冠联赛两年。然而，俱乐部向体育仲裁法院提起上诉，并使禁令被撤销。

上周，西班牙足球联赛主席哈维尔·特巴斯（Javier Tebas）将法院 2020 年的裁决描述为“严重误导”且“对欧洲足球经济控制系统的公信力造成了极大损害”。他长期以来一直警告称，未能控制“国家所有俱乐部”会对欧洲足球带来危险。

在裁决后的几年里，海湾地区在体育领域的影响力不断增长。卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯都在 2021 年加入了 F1 赛历，同年沙特公共投资基金收购了纽卡斯尔联队。根据研究机构 Play the Game 2023 年的一份报告，沙特实体目前在体育领域拥有 300 多项赞助协议，涵盖拳击、网球等项目。

虽然自中东战争开始以来，部分体育支出有所削减，尤其是利雅得对现已破产的 LIV 高尔夫巡回赛的投资，但该地区对全球体育的重要性将持续存在。沙特阿拉伯将在 2034 年举办世界杯，追随卡塔尔的脚步，并一直在权衡申办奥运会的可能性。国际奥委会本周确认了卡塔尔 2036 年奥运会的候选资格。

“站在‘爸爸’正确的一边”

英超联赛对曼城财务状况的自有调查始于2018年。但直到2023年2月，才正式指控曼城违反财务规则115项，并将该俱乐部移交给独立委员会。裁决结果又花了三年半时间才出炉，但结果是不容置疑的：委员会认定该俱乐部几乎所有指控均成立。

这些调查结果使曼城的未来陷入不确定之中。可能的制裁范围从罚款、扣分到被逐出英超联赛不等。基于报告中严厉的措辞，许多法律专家预计处罚将非常严重。

英国新成立的足球监管机构上周承诺，在“有明确证据表明个人存在违规行为”的情况下，将行使其权力评估所有者、董事和高管的适用性。一名接近曼城的人士表示，所有者最初决心留任，但指出球迷的反应比预期的更为复杂。

“你得问这样一个问题，所有者还想继续吗？”曾在2003年结束曼城主席任期的伯恩斯坦（Bernstein）表示，“这曾是对他们极好的公关，但现在却成了一场灾难。”伯纳姆（Burnham）本人是一名热情的足球迷，他上周告诉BBC，如果曼城的所有者出售球队或被强行驱逐，他将“非常担忧”，并称他们是“建设现代曼彻斯特的巨大合作伙伴”。唐宁街随后对此表态进行了修正。

一名英超俱乐部的国际高管在谈到英国与阿联酋的关系时表示：“说到底，你们必须站在‘爸爸’正确的一边。”一名英国政府前官员则反驳称，“认为阿联酋会突然撤出对英投资的想法完全是被夸大了。”

尽管如此，历届英国政府一直寻求海湾地区的投资，这场风波在可预见的未来可能会影响英阿关系。一些人将曼城案视为这项运动在金钱世界中迷失方向的最新迹象。“我从未对这项运动的未来感到如此沮丧，”这位资深足球高管表示，“我认为足球现在正处于一种前所未有的脆弱状态。”

由Andrew England, Caroline Binham, Lucy Fisher和George Parker提供额外报道

自2008-09赛季以来，曼城在球员身上的支出超过了皇家马德里和巴塞罗那的总和

* 球员购买支出减去球员出售收入 来源：Transfermarkt

在2012-13至2023-24赛季期间，曼城在欧洲俱乐部赛事中积累积分的速度快于大多数竞争对手（欧足联俱乐部系数，五年滚动总计）

欧足联根据各俱乐部在欧足联冠军联赛、欧足联欧罗巴联赛和欧足联欧洲会议联赛中的成绩，计算每赛季的俱乐部系数。最近五个赛季的总和用于对俱乐部进行排名以决定种子队身份。来源：Uefa

金融时报 “无畏无私”

建立一个非洲评级机构是简单的一部分

政府应投入更多精力改善投资环境

本周，非洲联盟在一定的宣传造势下启动了非洲信用评级机构（AfCRA）。多年来，非洲一直抱怨非洲主权国家、企业和项目在贷款时支付的成本过高，且对该大陆的贷款受到错误风险认知的阻碍。这家总部位于毛里求斯的机构现在有机会证明那些对非洲持怀疑态度的人是错误的。

尽管非洲约占全球产出和贸易的 3%，但吸引的全球私人股权仅约为 1%。即便如此，这一数字仍低估了该大陆巨大的资金需求与资本可用性（以及至关重要的资本成本）之间的差距。

对于一家新的信用评级机构来说，改变风险认知并非易事。中国和欧洲都曾试图创建或鼓励建立自己的评级机构，以对抗美国的三大评级公司——穆迪（Moody’s）、标普全球评级（S&P Global Ratings）和惠誉评级（Fitch Ratings）——这三家公司占据了全球未偿债务评级份额的 95%。由于建立公信力需要数年甚至数十年时间，这些机构取得的进展非常有限。如果人们怀疑这家非洲新机构存在的理由（raison d’être）是为了提供更宽松的评级以降低资本成本，那么情况将尤为严峻。

是否存在所谓的“非洲溢价”仍有争议。非洲各国政府认为，与风险状况相似的国家相比，他们在贷款时支付的成本更高。但很难说这在多大程度上是由于偏见或无知，在多大程度上是由于对透明度、数据质量以及对政策突然变动的担忧等真实问题。而且，主张与反主张之间很难理清，因为较低的评级会导致更高的借贷成本，从而增加违约概率，这在某种程度上成了自我实现的预言。

即便没有其他作用，一家非洲评级机构也可以通过对三大机构未覆盖的债务进行评级，来帮助培育更深层的资本市场。据估计，非洲拥有 $4tn 的国内资本池，包括养老金、保险和主权财富基金，但其中大部分是通过短期政府债务循环利用的，流向风险资本的资金很少。

非洲各国政府抱怨三大评级机构缺乏实地专业知识，从事的是被他们轻蔑地称为“桌面练习”的工作。在这一点上，AfCRA 确实可以通过提供更细颗粒度的数据来填补空白。

尽管如此，要消除“非洲打算给自己打分”的怀疑依然不易。为了消除此类疑虑，评级必须极其客观，且方法论完全透明。

非盟已明确 AfCRA 将没有政府所有权。这是好事。只要有最轻微的迹象表明该新机构受制于主权

审慎且稳定的宏观政策、针对投资者的清晰透明的规则、公正的法院以及可靠的电力、道路和港口是发展的基石，但这些很难

借款人，对其公信力都将是致命的。遗憾的是，股东名单在本周启动前并未公布。隐瞒如此关键的信息显得很奇怪，并引发了人们对该新机构财务可行性的质疑。目前尚不清楚 AfCRA 是否拥有足够的财力来聘请其所需的、具备相应水准和数量的评级专家，以确保其自身能够开展超出“桌面练习”的工作。

即便该机构能够克服这些障碍，还有一个更广泛的问题。非洲各国政府在批评现有评级体制上花费了大量的政治资本。这有点像是在攻击信使。更好的做法是将精力投入到改善投资环境本身。这意味着，除其他方面外，还需实施审慎且稳定的宏观政策；为投资者制定清晰透明的规则；建立公正的法院；以及提供可靠的电力、道路和港口。这些是发展的基石，但实现起来很困难。相比之下，建立一家评级机构简直是小儿科。

观点 贸易

英国汽车市场的争夺战已开启——目前如此

Ann Kiernan

Soumaya Keynes

想象一下，几辆赛车正为了赢得一座奖杯而竞速：这座奖杯就是英国市场。赌注很高。按价值计算，英国是全球第三大车辆进口国。这场竞争相对开放。与偏好雷诺的法国人或重视大众的德国人不同，英国人是不具有爱国主义倾向的汽车买家。而且，竞争正变得日益危险。在地缘经济紧张的背景下，参赛者如果能避免碰撞，就算运气不错了。

多年来，欧盟一直是英国市场无可争议的冠军，至少从汽车产地来看是这样。（在英国销售的大多数美国、日本或韩国品牌汽车都来自欧洲大陆的工厂。）但自疫情和脱欧以来，该集团的主导地位有所下降。在 2010 年代，它

自特朗普关税以来，英国已成为欧洲汽车出口的首选目的地

贡献了约 90% 的英国汽车进口价值，而过去一年其份额已低于 70%。

欧盟并不打算在这场竞赛中落败。自从美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的关税重创美国销量以来，英国已成为欧盟汽车出口的首选目的地。德国尤其渴望获胜，因为自疫情以来，其对英国的出口份额下降幅度超过了欧盟平均水平。德国汽车行业一直处于长年的低迷状态，引发了人们对去工业化和经济实力削弱的担忧。

主要的挑战者当然是中国。经过多年的残酷竞争和强有力的工业政策，中国的汽车制造商能够生产出让 YouTube 评论员赞叹不已的技术车辆，且电池成本比欧洲低 35%。鉴于其巨大的产能和糟糕的国内需求，这些竞争对手对业务充满渴望。今年上半年，中国的汽车销量同比下降了 20%。在同一时期，其对英国的汽车出口增长了 80% 以上。

值得注意的是，其他地区的处境比欧盟更糟。过去一年，英国从欧盟进口的汽车价值有所增长，因此中国仅在一定程度上限制了欧盟疫情后的复苏。在同一时期，英国从日本、南非、土耳其和北美的进口量均有所下降，尽管其基数较低。

但这并不能让欧盟的任何人感到宽慰。由于这与摆脱内燃机车辆的转型同步进行，这是一场关乎未来的竞赛。如果按车型细分，中国的出口激增在混合动力汽车类别中势头最强——而这正是欧盟出口陷入停滞的领域。

欧盟已经忍无可忍，希望英国采取干预措施。他们要求征收关税，以抵消中国生产商多年来从国内工业政策中获得的优势。但即使没有所谓的“不公平”，考虑到中国将供应武器化的习惯，反击中国在汽车生产领域的主导地位也是有道理的。（中国制造商已经主导了电池供应链的部分环节。）

英国政府正在考虑征收关税，但处于一个尴尬的境地。公众可能会被说服。高级公务员珍妮·贝茨（Jenny Bates）在牛津大学担任研究员期间告诉我，她基于焦点小组的研究表明，如果能让国家更安全，选民可能会接受更高的成本。但同样有可能的是，公众真的很喜欢配备巨大平板屏幕的廉价汽车。

英国汽车工业萎缩的困境并未使选择变得简单。产量已从 2016 年的 1.7mn 辆缩减至 2025. 年的仅 0.7mn 辆。但由于大部分产出用于出口，英国工业似乎对寻求抵御中国竞争的保护不那么感兴趣，而更倾向于游说降低能源成本、降低绿色目标的雄心，以及吸引中国投资。

欧盟正将另一场竞赛作为激励英国采取行动的诱因。欧盟的《工业加速法案》（Industrial Accelerator Act）是一项正在制定中的政策，部分旨在加强欧洲汽车工业。如果英国对中国汽车保持开放，它将面临被排除在外的风险。鉴于欧盟是英国最大的出口目的地，这将造成损害。

在欧盟和中国之间被迫做出艰难选择时，地理、历史和意识形态都将英国推向其邻居。但下次当有人要求征收关税时，我建议问一个问题：如果中国通过关闭其市场，或者更糟，切断其供应链来报复，会发生什么？欧盟在这场竞赛中投入了大量资金。但如果发生碰撞，它会帮忙清理现场吗？

soumaya.keynes@ft.com

读者来信

历史表明，有针对性的升级可以威慑俄罗斯

在名为《欧洲可以挫败俄罗斯的混合战争》（评论版，10月1日）的客座专栏中，亚历山大·加布耶夫（Alexander Gabuev）认为，面对克里姆林宫日益增加的混合战争攻击，欧洲应当增强其安全和国防能力，而非冒险通过直接的进攻性回应来引发升级。

如果欧洲决策者试图说服克里姆林宫限制对乌克兰平民和基础设施目标的袭击，那么在强势地位上进行谈判无疑是有意义的。然而，作者

为什么公共采购是一把双刃贸易之剑

我很有兴趣地阅读了彼得·福斯特（Peter Foster）近期关于英国政府“购买英国货”计划（报告，9月22日）以及欧盟新兴的“欧洲制造”倡议的文章。

这些政策背后的担忧是可以理解的。正如安格斯·汉顿（Angus Hanton）在其2024年出版的《附庸国：美国如何掌控英国》（Vassal State: How America Runs Britain）一书中所述：“如果你不将合同交给国内公司，那么当你最需要它们的时候，它们将不复存在。”

英吉利海峡两岸的政府都担心，开放的采购市场可能导致了战略依赖，并削弱了国内的工业能力。

然而，这里存在一个复杂因素：国际采购承诺。欧盟已通过双边和多边协议，将其采购市场的很大一部分向贸易伙伴开放。脱欧后，英国寻求保留其作为欧盟成员国时所享有的绝大部分互惠准入权。这些承诺可以被撤销的情况（包括基于国家安全理由）相对狭窄。

《2023年采购法》（Procurement Act 2023）体现了这种紧张关系。该法允许合同主管机关在认定符合国家安全利益的情况下，对合同适用或部分不适用该法。

原则上，这为限制竞争至英国供应商留下了相当大的自由空间。但这种自由的行使必须与英国的国际义务保持一致，而这些义务限制了排除条约伙伴供应商的情况。

限制英国倾向于国内供应商自由的同一套承诺，同时也帮助英国公司确保获得海外采购机会。因此，寻求扩大“购买英国货”的范围，与担心英国公司在“欧洲制造”政策中处于不利地位的合理关切之间存在矛盾。

采购在产业政策中仍可发挥重要作用。但这些倡议可能会揭示采购作为重建工业能力手段的局限性。一种替代方案是对这些承诺中的豁免条款采取更宽泛的解释。

然而，由于国家安全和其他例外条款的界限在国际贸易体系的其他领域已在接受考验，这种做法可能会产生远超公共采购范围的影响。托蒂斯·科措尼斯（Totis Kotsonis）

合伙人，补贴、采购、贸易协定及贸易救济负责人，Pinsent Masons，英国伦敦 EC2

夸大了失控升级的风险。对升级的恐惧其实是另一种说法，即西方政府担心其公民在与核大国的冲突中丧生。这是可以理解的。

然而，对于西方民主国家来说，比失控升级更危险的是向侵略者发出信号：只要其施加足够的压力——无论是通过混合攻击、金融威胁、切断能源供应还是其他手段——欧洲迟早会崩溃，并在不顾乌克兰人意愿的情况下达成协议，

“我称之为美洲豹”

如果您对《金融时报》处理您投诉的方式不满意，可以向《金融时报》编辑投诉专员提出申诉：complaints.commissioner@ft.com

耐克中国战略预示所有品牌将迎来巨变

耐克正竭力扭转其在中国市场营收下滑的局面，这一战略预示着公司价值链全球布局正在发生巨变（见10月1日报告《耐克竭力恢复其在中国的影响力》）。

几十年来，主要发达经济体的价值链制造环节因低成本的吸引力而外包至中国。而现在发生的事情可以说更为重大。即便一些集团正将其制造业务多样化至中国以外的地区，但越来越多的国际品牌正将价值链中的产品设计与开发环节设在中国。这不仅是为了针对中国本土市场进行本地化设计和创造，也是为了全球市场。西方汽车制造商就是这一新兴趋势的典型代表。

然而，国际公司采取这种策略以应对中国挑战者的竞争，是否能克服在中国市场以及日益扩展至海外的威胁，仍有待观察。无论如何，国际品牌别无选择，只能推动其价值链向中国迁移。

这种重新配置给发达经济体带来了挑战。价值链的产品和开发阶段涉及高价值活动，能提供高薪就业机会。虽然制造环节的外包导致了发达经济体制造业岗位的规模化空心化，但随着价值链设计阶段向中国迁移成为常态，规模较小但类似的命运正悄然逼近。

路易斯·布伦南（Louis Brennan）教授 都柏林圣三一大学圣三一商学院，爱尔兰。谁在做出真正的牺牲。在目前的乌克兰僵局中，北约尚未针对其成员国领土遭受的入侵采取任何军事反制措施，甚至没有为克里姆林宫划定任何“红线”，仅让乌克兰武装部队独自证明他们能够有效地反击。

事实上，历史告诉我们，方向正确的升级可以迫使克里姆林宫退缩。1968年8月，亚历山大·杜布切克（Alexander Dubček）及其部长们被飞往莫斯科，恳请列昂尼德·勃列日涅夫（Leonid Brezhnev）允许在

我们今天建设的电网应适应未来

关于“全球8000万公里电网问题”中对输电投资、许可和基础设施瓶颈的关注是非常恰当的（见9月25日 FT.com Moral Money 专栏）。但对话中一个重要的部分经常被忽视，即电网内部部署的技术。

变电站内部的设备，包括断路器和高压开关设备，对于电力系统安全、可靠且具韧性的运行至关重要。随着电网演变为日益互联的“电力超级高速公路”以支持电气化、可再生能源和增长的需求，今天所做的基础设施决策将决定未来几十年的电网性能和可持续性。

环境因素值得更多关注。长期用于电网设备绝缘和防故障的六氟化硫是全球最强效的温室气体，其全球变暖潜能比二氧化碳高 23,500 倍。然而，可行的无六氟化硫替代方案已经出现，它们能提供现代输电网络所需的可靠性、可扩展性和紧凑足迹，且不具备环境风险。

随着电网基础设施投资的加速，决策时不应仅考虑成本、安全性和可靠性，还应考虑产品生命周期的长期环境影响。挑战不仅在于建设更多的电网基础设施，而在于确保我们今天建设的电网能够适应可持续的未来。 马库斯·海姆巴赫（Markus Heimbach） 日立能源（Hitachi Energy）高压产品业务单元首席执行官，瑞士苏黎世

养老金三重锁与代际公平

现在或许确实到了废除“三重锁”的时候了（见9月 12 评论版），但该文章并未承认年轻人的预期 / 权利发生了怎样的变化。他们现在期望能立即成为房主，且通常是以单身身份，并抚养一个或多个孩子。与此同时，他们期望拥有手机、出国度假、一辆较新的汽车、健身房会员资格以及Netflix等。我们当年没有这些东西。我们租房住，在早年生活艰辛，最终才成为房主。而我们拥有三重锁保障的国家养老金、房产增值以及我们的积蓄，现在正被无限期地用于支付我丈夫每周 1,800 英镑 的护理院费用。 Beverley Adams 英国，剑桥

电子邮件：letters.editor@ft.com

请附上白天的电话号码和详细地址 勘误：corrections@ft.com

捷克斯洛伐克。杜布切克（Dubček）的自由化改革得到了西方的巨大支持，但他最终屈服了，俄罗斯坦克开进布拉格，粉碎了“布拉格之春”。西方在 1968, 表现出了克制，因此勃列日涅夫肆意践踏捷克斯洛伐克。相比之下，约翰·F·肯尼迪在 1962 的“古巴危机”中没有退缩，尼基塔·赫鲁晓夫随后撤走了导弹。如果具备果断行动的政治意愿，有时受控的升级是有效的。 Marek Svoboda 德国，法兰克福

一个完全多余的 Anthropic “风险因素”

你们报道称，Anthropic 在其 IPO 招股说明书中将“人类灭绝”列为一个风险因素（见9月 30 报道）。

如果这种风险真的成为现实，那么将不再有原告，不再有被告，也不再有律师能代表任何想要起诉 Anthropic 未能发出警告的人。

鉴于此类风险因素的主要目的是为随后的诉讼提供保护，这一个因素似乎完全是在浪费时间。

我想知道 Anthropic 支付了多少律师费来起草这样一个多余的条款。 Simon Samuels 英国，赫特福德郡，拉德莱特

为在曼城风波中被“欺骗”的俱乐部考虑一下

曼城足球俱乐部的财务行为反映了英超联赛企业治理中最糟糕的过度行为（见9月 26 《金融时报》周末版报道，“曼城被裁定违反英超规则”）。

至关重要的一点是，任何处罚都不能为了安抚俱乐部所有者谢赫·曼苏尔·本·扎耶德·阿尔纳哈扬（Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan）而减轻。指控非常严重，其他俱乐部受到的影响同样重要。

一个例子是斯托克城，当时的教练托尼·普利斯（Tony Pulis）目睹这支斯塔福德郡球队在 2011 年足总杯决赛中 1-0 输给了曼城。在最近的一篇 BBC 文章中，普利斯表示他并不指望能获得冠军奖牌，但仍然感到被“欺骗”了。

这种认为曼城不诚实的感觉将被对方球迷猛烈利用，用以激怒曼城支持者，并污染各个球场的氛围。

应当指出，切尔西曾接受调查并在夏季达成和解，而埃弗顿和诺丁汉森林则因违规行为遭受了规模小得多的扣分处罚。无论最终做出什么样的处罚，曼城已经毒害了这项美丽的运动。 David Rimmer 英国，赫特福德郡，赫特福德希思

对你们关于摩擦学文章的质疑

我担心 Anjana Ahuja 对摩擦学（研究表面相互运动、产生摩擦和磨损的科学与技术）的热情有些失控，因为她暗示“……克服轮胎与路面之间的摩擦……”是理想的。事实上，一定的摩擦是必要的，且其本身消耗的燃料很少（见10月 7 评论版，“摩擦学如何让经济世界运转”）。 Nick Collings 英国，剑桥

评论

欧洲急需一些美国式的乐观主义

即使是对股票市场仅有浅显观察的人也会注意到，欧洲股票与美国股票相比显得多么便宜：总体而言，相对于利润，它们的交易价格折价超过四分之一。但那些在欧洲大陆寻找廉价股的选股者很快就会有一个不愉快的发现。可供选择的大型欧洲公司少得多，而且它们的折价几乎总是反映出其增长速度慢于美国同行。“欧洲折价”之所以存在，主要是因为欧洲公司难以扩张。

询问欧洲投资者、高管和企业家原因何在——以及是否可以改变——他们会感到悲观。无论是过度监管、碎片化的语言和传统，还是对待风险和工作的态度，答案都是问题已经存在了数十年，现在也不会改变。作为一名从外部观察的美国人，我持有不同的观点：许多增长障碍是可以克服的，而且已经出现了进步的迹象。

欧洲的规模化问题可以分解为三个“C”：规范（canons）、文化（culture）和资本（capital）。欧洲的规范——即其法律和法规——是最被讨论的问题，在马里奥·德拉吉（Mario Draghi）和恩里科·莱塔（Enrico Letta）关于竞争力和市场改革的报告中得到了充分描述。最有害的是在数据、公共采购、税务等方面昂贵的国家系统重复建设。

在文化上，欧洲存在异质性形式——语言、习俗、口味——这使得某些行业难以在整个大陆实现规模化，且这些异质性不会消失（而且谁会想要一个同质化的欧洲？）。但文化也采取了不那么良性的形式：一些虽然没有被法律规定，但却保护了反增长现状的行为。

莱塔指出，在不同国家生活和工作的欧洲人发现，他们在每个国家都需要当地的银行账户和电话号码才能支付房租和开设公用事业账户。没有法律强制执行这类事情，但它无处不在，并且保护了当地既得利益者，使其免受跨国创新者和整合者的冲击。对于个人来说，这是一个麻烦。而对于一家必须在不同国家支付薪水、提供住房、调动并连接员工的小型成长型公司来说。

欧盟企业增长问题之突出之处在于，其解决方案并不涉及糟糕的权衡

欧洲，就像是一个防止它们前行的锚。

最近的一篇论文发现，美国与欧洲企业之间的估值和规模差距，无法用少数几家美国巨头公司、欧洲企业在美上市，或是两个市场的行业构成来解释。相反，“这种差距恰恰集中在企业的价值并非取决于当下的现金流，而取决于增长期权的地方”。欧洲市场的碎片化至关重要：销售增长与企业当地市场的规模密切相关——而这种模式在美国公司中并不存在。此外，在为年轻的高增长企业提供“耐心且耐风险的资本”方面存在巨大缺口，作者将这一问题部分归因于欧盟的养老金计划未能创建大规模的可投资资本池。

但欧洲公司难以规模化是因为缺乏资本，还是因为难以规模化导致资本投入较少？两者可能同时在起作用；我认为投资者在寻找，但没有发现。长期投资不足意味着创业者的支持系统发育不足，预期较低，且支持增长改革的政治力量薄弱。

但这并不意味着改变是不可能的。在所有地缘政治问题中，欧洲企业的增长问题之所以突出，是因为其解决方案并不涉及糟糕的权衡。在共同市场内为企业建立一个超国家监管住所的提案——即“第28种制度”——可以带来监管统一的益处。那些抑制竞争的扼杀性商业行为可以被根除。欧洲拥有五个主要证券交易所和许多小型交易所。此前被欧盟阻挠的整合进程，可以将交易所数量减少到一两个，从而创造更深厚的流动性池。只要条件合适，欧盟公司完全有能力快速增长，正如 Aldi 和 ASML 的全球规模所证明的那样。

目前的共识是，考虑到根深蒂固的本地利益和过度谨慎的欧洲官僚机构，实质性的改变在政治上是不可能的。不要如此肯定。在德国，从现收现付制养老金转向公共投资模式的计划正在进行中。UniCredit 计划收购德国商业银行（Commerzbank），这可能为创建欧洲冠军银行开辟道路。这两项变化在几年前都是难以想象的。这是典型的美国式天真吗？绝对是。但也许一点点天真正是欧洲所需要的。

robert.armstrong@ft.com

巴登诺克统一右翼的计划

政治 罗伯特·什里姆斯利（Robert Shrimsley）

对改革党强硬，对产生改革党的原因强硬。在经历了两年的自我怀疑、生存之战，以及要求与奈杰尔·法拉奇（Nigel Farage）达成协议以“统一右翼”的密集呼声之后，凯米·巴登诺克（Kemi Badenoch）领导的保守党已经制定了自己的应对策略：正面迎击改革党并将其击溃。

仅仅是阐述这个想法，就足以揭示挑战的规模。尽管存在诸多问题和丑闻，但改革党在大多数民调中依然领先于保守党。在保守党活动家基础被掏空的同时，改革党正在全国范围内赢得议会席位。法拉奇的政党可能正处于他所承认的低谷期，但它并不会就此消失。

但巴登诺克的党代会演讲、政策公告以及近期对这位右翼挑战者的攻击表明，在经历了一年试图在“法拉奇化”上胜过法拉奇的胆怯尝试后，她已经做出了将火力转向改革党的战略决定，并在情感上相信这一方案可行。

仅靠一次几乎没人关注的党代会演讲还远远不够。但近几个月来，巴登诺克在攻击改革党时变得越来越自信。她对改革党领导层表现出的明显蔑视表明，对于他们的违规本能和有毒的委屈文化，绝不可能达成妥协。这种本能也为保守党战略家提供了一条可能的路径，以应对他们面临的核心挑战——赢回左右两翼流失的选民。

因为虽然巴登诺克获得了信心和人气，但保守党本身并没有。这种差距在党代会上显而易见。巴登诺克就像一个人类灯泡，但她给房间带来的能量在她离开的一瞬间就消失了。

这场沉闷的党代会笼罩在一种不真实的乐观氛围中。“经济现实将让安迪·伯纳姆（Andy Burnham）付出代价，”一名影子大臣说道。“改革党完蛋了，”一名财务支持者表示。一名战略家则认为，税收和经济问题将吸引那些自利地倾向于自由民主党的选民回归。

也许如此，但正如巴登诺克评价伯纳姆时所说，“希望并不是一种战略”。即便改革党的支持率回落到上次选举的水平，那14 per cent的支持率也足以分化右翼选票，从而让工党赢得选举。伯纳姆显然是一个比斯塔默（Starmer）更出色的政治操盘手。而且，工党将利用人们对改革党的恐惧来压制保守党的得票率，大肆宣传可能让法拉奇就职的协议前景。

经过本周，巴登诺克的战略已经很明确。首先，针对产生改革党的原因。她将深陷丑闻、财务状况可疑的领导层与选民区分开来。通过支持实施更严格的移民管制、遣返罪犯和非法移民、加强警务力度以及大规模扩建监狱，巴登诺克的保守党为那些被改革党吸引的人提供了一套方案。

接下来是经济。伯纳姆向左转的趋势打开了一个政治空间。巴登诺克承诺一项围绕减税、削减开支和去监管的增长议程。这里仍然存在差距，尤其是排除了与欧盟建立更紧密关系的可能。她对储蓄的承诺因反对伯纳姆重塑养老金“三重锁”计划而受到削弱。但一个广泛的赌注是，随着选民对经济低迷和高税收感到厌倦，他们会重新审视保守党。与此同时，她像取消家庭住宅遗产税这样的头条政策，表明她的目标直指更富裕的选民。

如果这就是全部政纲，那还不够。价值观和身份认同依然至关重。

在试图比法拉奇更像法拉奇地争取选民一年之后，她做出了一个战略决定，将火力转向改革党（Reform UK），因为对方已经得势过多。但通过在本周以排除任何结盟可能的措辞攻击法拉奇的政党，她将保守党置于了反改革党的阵营之中。她敢于且真诚地谴责那些质疑非白人（包括她的混血子女）是否具有英国特质的人，这一正确之举向迷失的温和派发出了他们所需的令人安心的信号。这意味着，她现在必须在管控那些倾向于改革党的前排议员的言论基调方面做得更好。

最后，如果那些回归的具有自由主义思想的保守党人能帮助她领先于改革党，她就能赢回那些将法拉奇视为工党主要选举对手而转向后者的交易型选民。至关重要的是，巴登诺克已经意识到，回归之路首先在于夺回中右翼。

当然，这只是理论。其中包含许多假设。威斯敏斯特可能会出现一场“凯米文艺复兴”（Keminaissance），但该党依然深受不信任。目前尚不清楚选民是否准备好倾听。仅仅是确保在右翼阵营中获得明确的主导地位就将是一项成就。即便改革党的支持率暴跌，法拉奇也是一名凶猛的斗士，且拥有一批可能已经根深蒂固的核心支持者。迷失的“留欧派”可能要求的不止是“不像法拉奇”——巴登诺克自身不妥协的本能可能会将他们推开。与此同时，她正寄希望于经济状况能击败伯纳姆。

但保守党只有在首先击败改革党之后才能挑战工党：巴登诺克的演讲表明她接受了这一现实。她现在的地位已足够稳固，可以贯彻执行。法拉奇未能扩大其吸引力，反而退缩回其强硬派基地，这提供了一个机会。如果右翼无法通过结盟实现统一，且改革党的领导人其吸引力已达上限，那么重建该阵营的唯一途径就在保守党旗下。尽管胜算不高，且此类策略在其他地方已经失败，但在我们的选举制度下，她还可以依靠另一个论点——即改革党无法获胜。

到目前为止，这还仅仅是一次演讲和一个计划。但自2024年失败以来，她的政党第一次找到了此前缺失的两样东西：一个可行的战略，以及与法拉奇对抗的骨气。正如她可能会说的那样，这是正确的方向。

robert.shrimsley@ft.com

英国不能浪费其 DeepMind 红利

奇怪的是，目前英国最令人振奋的进展之一在政党会议期间几乎没有被提及。机构投资者们也对此讨论不多。尽管威斯敏斯特和伦敦金融城表现得漠不关心，但英国在过去 15 年里已经建立了全球第三强的创新经济体。现在，新一代企业家正忙于推出数十家雄心勃勃的 AI 赋能初创公司。

由我共同创立且由《金融时报》支持的媒体集团 Sifted 上周发布的最新排名显示，在全欧洲增长最快的 250 家早期初创公司中，有 32% 来自英国。紧随其后的是此前一批增长强劲的由风险投资支持的英国公司。硅谷并非玩风险投资游戏的唯一场所。根据英国商业银行（British Business Bank）的数据，在某些衡量标准下，英国风险投资公司在 2020 年至 2024 年间的综合回报率超过了同期美国同行所产生的回报。

考虑到技术的演进速度，接下来的 12 到 18 个月对于决定这些英国初创公司是繁荣还是凋零至关重要。人们希望其中一些公司能够抓住机遇，将 AI 的益处扩散到不同行业，振兴英国经济并成长为全球参与者。伦敦快速增长的 初创公司，如 Wayve、ElevenLabs、Synthesia、CuspAI 和 PhysicsX，已经有望改变自动驾驶、音频和视频生成、材料科学及工程等截然不同的行业。

但风险在于，该国另一波最具雄心的企业家可能会移居美国。面对国内不断上涨的税收和能源成本，他们可能更倾向于加入西海岸由 驱动的淘金热。

将伦敦打造成为全球 热点的功劳很大程度上归功于德米斯·哈萨比斯爵士（Sir Demis Hassabis），他是获得诺贝尔奖的 Google DeepMind 联合创始人。DeepMind 成立于 2010 年，迅速成为领先的 研究公司，吸引了来自世界各地的人才。

在 2014 年被谷歌收购后，资本、计算能力和数据的海量注入，使 DeepMind 能够开创一些机器学习技术，为—。

面对国内不断上涨的税收和能源成本，创业者可能会加入美国西海岸的淘金热

驱动着最新一轮 AI 浪潮。但谷歌正日益将其 AI 重心移回加利福尼亚州，这引发了伦敦 DeepMind 的一系列离职潮。

这些校友的去向可能是该国面临的最重要的战略问题之一。追踪 AI 研究人员的 Zeki 发现，DeepMind 在欧洲依然是一个巨大的天才磁铁。但离开这里加入竞争对手 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 的研究人员数量，要多于反向流动的人数。

目前仍担任 Google 主席的哈萨比斯（Hassabis），同时也是其总部位于伦敦的分拆公司 Isomorphic Labs 的首席执行官，该公司已筹集 $600mn 用于加速药物研发。其他几位前 研究人员也创办了实验室。

最值得关注的是，大卫·西尔弗（David Silver）创立了 Ineffable Intelligence，该公司已筹集了创纪录的 10亿美元 种子轮资金，以探索实现“超级智能”的方法。 前首席科学家蒂姆·罗克塔舍尔（Tim Rocktäschel）共同创立了 Recursive Superintelligence，筹集资金超过 $500mn。 的校友还创办了另外三家风险企业：Emulate、Revolution Labs 和 Metis Reasoning。

“我认为这是伦敦的一个伟大时刻。在广泛的思想领域中，有许多非常有趣的……活动，”一名正在创办新初创公司的前 研究人员表示，“ 带来的红利是惊人的。”

一些初创公司创始人抱怨，竞业禁止条款使他们更难从美国大型科技公司招聘人才。但英国 AI 部长卡尼什卡·纳拉扬（Kanishka Narayan）上周表示，政府正在“极其迅速”地寻求解决方案。他还承诺，政府将与英国初创公司签订更多合同。

国内增长资本的匮乏是另一个行业痛点。投资集团 Phoenix Court 主席索尔·克莱恩（Saul Klein）表示，在幕后，历届政府已帮助改善了金融支持体系。英国商业银行（British Business Bank）规模有所扩大，地方养老基金正在整合，且有 17 家基金管理公司承诺增加对国内私募市场的投资。

但到目前为止，国内资本仅在缓慢流入。克莱恩对此感到困惑：为什么美国、加拿大、日本和新加坡的投资者比该国自身的机构基金更热衷于支持英国的年轻公司。一个显而易见的投资机会就在他们眼皮底下。如果他们未能采取行动，对英国来说将是一场悲剧。

john.thornhill@ft.com

AI时代的网络战争将截然不同

Ahana Datta Fasel

上个月，澳大利亚政府透露，AI代理已入侵其医疗保健系统。两周前，Anthropic报告称，俄罗斯网络攻击者正利用AI更高效地进行侦察、黑客攻击和数据窃取。这些以及其他数十起网络攻击尚未实现完全自主化，但它们已开始显现出将控制权交给机器所带来的代价。

对于人类防御者而言，自主网络攻击是一场“完美风暴”，它掩盖了攻击者的意图，并增加了追究键盘前操作人员责任的难度。但使用AI同样给攻击者带来了不确定性。AI将根据其遇到的情况（网络、防御措施和机会）调整自身行为，自行决定如何实现人类设定的目标。这种行为可能并非总是可预测的，而且很快可能不再总是可控的。

莫斯科有着利用不确定性的传统。1918年，俄罗斯军事思想家将第一次世界大战中规避监视的经验纳入到更广泛的“掩护”（maskirovka）概念中。欺骗在对手心中制造关于意图和能力的疑虑，从而延迟、干扰并限制其反应。一个世纪后，这一策略经常出现在与俄罗斯相关的网络行动中。

从历史上看，欺骗是一种对抗行为：一方故意为另一方制造不确定性。但自主系统在双向地引入不确定性——且不一定

攻击者必须权衡失去对防御者如何解读其行为之控制的风险

有意为之。防御者必须考虑自主系统的未来行为；而攻击者则必须权衡失去对防御者如何解读其行为之控制的风险。

“掩蔽战术”（Maskirovka）试图将不确定性武器化，以利用威慑的基本逻辑：当对手认为行动成本将超过收益时，采取行动的可能性较低。但这已不再是一个简单的计算。如今，不确定性可以改变双方采取行动的意愿。对于攻击者而言，失去控制已成为计算的一部分。误读可能会使升级局势变得更难遏制。

什么样的国家（或 AI 实验室）可能愿意承担这种风险？寻求严密控制结果的行为体可能不希望将关键决策外包。但一个重视对网络具有适应性和持久访问权限的行为体，尽管面临意外后果的风险，也可能愿意接受不确定性。同样，陷入绝境的行为体可能会寻求创造周旋的空间。

犯罪分子和国家支持的行为体现在正表现出一种意愿，即为了能力（无论是为了间谍活动还是勒索软件）而牺牲控制权。交给 AI 系统的自主权越多，防御者就越难将机器的无意行为与局势升级区分开来，攻击者也越难控制后果。如今的威慑必须针对这种权衡。

想象一个类似于近期针对法国国防工业或波兰电网的网络攻击场景，但操作员设定的是目标，而非指令每一个步骤。在一个网络中，AI 窃取凭据并收集信息。在另一个网络中，它寻找一个连接系统并对其进行探测，以帮助维持访问权限。观察第二次操作的防御者无法看到原始指令，只能看到敌对行为体在网络中深入渗透。防御者必须决定：这是间谍活动、破坏准备还是其他情况？适当的应对措施是什么？

欺骗的价值不在于无限期地隐藏真相，而在于隐藏足够长的时间，以压缩防御者的决策窗口。将自主系统引入其中改变了旧有的交易。欺骗者再也无法确定其制造的模糊性将仅停留在对方身上。在危机中，这可能会导致双方在应对一个双方都无法辨明含义的行为时陷入混乱。

作者是《全栈间谍：美中竞争时代的网络间谍活动》（Full Stack Spies: Cyber Espionage in the Age of US — China Competition）一书的作者。

能源危机正在改变投资者对石油巨头的期望

法国南部的一家炼油厂 —— Miguel Medina / 伊朗战争给市场带来的巨大动荡为能源公司创造了机遇。有些公司的表现比其他公司更好。由于通过霍尔木兹海峡的运输仍然极不稳定，目前有三种特质被证明尤为宝贵——而这些特质恰恰是那些不受宠的欧洲石油巨头的强项。

首先且最重要的是炼油能力。并非所有石油钻探商都能将原油转化为航空燃料和柴油等专业商品。长期以来，在钻探和炼油两项活动中规模都较大的公司并不流行。它们很难与中东和亚洲规模更大、更新且成本更低的炼油厂竞争。

但海湾地区的动荡严重削弱了这些精炼燃料的供应：根据分析平台 Kpler 的数据，供应量较战前已减半。这意味着精炼产品的交易价格远高于其主要原材料，由此产生的价差为那些能够自行完成转化过程的公司带来了意外之财。

埃克森美孚（ExxonMobil）是那些在炼油领域依然规模巨大的公司之一，其处理的原油桶数几乎与其产量相当。但除了这个特例，欧洲巨头们的地位更为有利。壳牌（Shell）和英国石油（BP）拥有规模庞大的炼油业务，而西班牙的雷普索尔（Repsol）炼油量比其产量高出 80% 以上。

第二个极具价值的特质是贸易业务。伊朗危机使通常自由流动的能源市场陷入混乱：石油和天然气贸易的价格根据购买的时间和地点而大相径庭。对于那些拥有全球油田组合、管道、储运终端、炼油厂、船队以及丰富商业联系名录的公司来说，这是一个机遇。

这些能力同样倾向于集中在欧洲公司。根据高盛（Goldman Sachs）的数据，在壳牌、英国石油和道达尔能源（TotalEnergies），贸易业务合计占 2025 年收益的 15-20%。与此同时，在美国，即使是规模最大、组织最完善的公司，也倾向于尽可能在井口或炼油厂门口销售。石油并非唯一一个因大西洋两岸习惯和文化差异而产生意外赢家和输家的行业：与美国同行不同，欧洲航空公司对燃料价格进行套期保值的倾向，事实证明也契合当下的时代精神。最后，靠近供需失衡最严重的地方也是一种优势。欧洲的天然气现货价格涨幅远超美国，不出所料，欧洲巨头在这一市场的风险敞口更大。挪威的 Equinor 预计，其油田在第三季度的天然气销售价格将比今年前三个月高出约 50%。

如果战争和能源动荡是短暂的，那么欧洲的优势可能也是短暂的

如果战争和能源动荡是短暂的，那么欧洲的优势可能也是短暂的。美国巨头拥有更好的增长前景和更具支持力的投资者群体。但伊朗冲突开始显得没完没了，而且即使问题得到解决，世界也将变得更加碎片化。

股票投资者可能才刚刚意识到这一点。欧洲的石油公司交易价格仍低于其美国同行，尽管这一差距在伊朗危机期间有所缩小。在石油自由流动看似不可撼动的常态时期，给予美国公司更高估值是完全合理的；但常态时期可能不会再回来了。

尽管利率飙升，银行股依然下跌

利率上升对银行而言可能是好事，也可能是坏事。但大多数情况下，其影响是积极的。

然而，近期银行股的下跌——即便债券收益率已触及数十年来的高点——反映出市场担心有异常力量在起作用。贷款机构喜欢高利率，因为它们向借款人收取的费用往往与市场基准同步上涨，而其中只有一小部分增幅会传递给储蓄者。尽管近期利率大幅跳升，但自9月初以来，欧洲大型贷款机构的 Stoxx 分级指数已下跌 7%，跌幅几乎是大盘的两倍。在贷款端，一个风险是价格变得如此之高，以至于需求开始萎缩——就像任何其他产品一样。英国五年期固定利率抵押贷款的平均利率近期已超过 6%，这对于希望扩大贷款增长的银行来说并非好事。

利率变动的类型同样重要。最近，短期债券的波动幅度大于长期债券。由于银行的商业模式是“短借长贷”，这种动态会损害盈利能力。与此同时，如果资金成本上升，银行此前享有的利润率扩张可能会开始逆转。由于雄心勃勃的金融科技公司提供丰厚的储蓄收益，存款竞争比过去更加激烈。

为了争夺储蓄者的资金而进行的激烈角逐，可能会推高银行的“存款贝塔”（deposit betas）——即银行必须将央行加息的多少比例传递给存款人。预计银行首席执行官在报告第三季度财报时将就该比率接受质询：美国贷款机构将于下周报告，欧洲机构则在随后的那一周。

并非所有人都感到担忧。Keefe, Bruyette & Woods 的分析师认为，欧洲的存款和贷款成本在同步上升，从而限制了利润率压力。德意志银行首席财务官 Raja Akram 在近期的一次会议上表示，利率变动应会带来更高收入。而且，并非所有异常力量都是负面的。欧洲的部分需求是由国防和基础设施投资等长期趋势驱动的，即使在更高的价格水平下，这些需求也应该是持久的。欧元区企业贷款的增长在 7 月和 8 月均高于 4%，为三年来的最高水平。

近期的抛售意味着预期至少被设定在较低水平。Stoxx 银行分级指数目前的远期市盈率低于年初水平；如果银行表现出看涨态势，其估值将显得更加便宜。欧洲银行已连续五年跑赢大盘，它们仍有很大机会将这一纪录延长至六年。

Boots被收购证明在英国商业街上，高龄也可以成为资产

按理说，Boots早就不该存在了。这家英国零售商已有177年历史，几十年来一直在努力维持其在商业街上的地位，而一波又一波的挑战者和技术威胁已经导致无数其他零售商倒闭。然而，本周这家英国连锁店被加拿大的Weston家族以$8.9bn的体面价格收购，这表明它仍有合理的未来。

它与其它零售商的不同之处之一在于其药房执照，以及能够让前来开药的顾客顺便购买其他商品的能力。

诚然，这种交叉销售采取过多种形式：在20世纪80年代，Boots将触角延伸到其他零售领域，收购了自行车和汽车零部件制造商Halfords的母公司。在某个阶段，它销售的产品涵盖了从摄像机到烤面包机的所有东西。超市最终在这些领域发力，但Boots通过转向美容产品得以幸存。根据存档的年度报告，到90年代中期，非处方药销售额约占营收的85%。

现在的Boots比以往更依赖其健康部门。而美容和健康正成为一种增长趋势。它的下一个机会可能在于提供更多服务而非仅仅是产品，例如形象改造和健康检查。

对于零售商而言，高龄实际上似乎能带来一些优势——例如顾客的一种情感认同。像Boots这样资深的公司很少见：在英国公司注册处（Companies House）登记的活跃企业中，拥有百年以上历史的不足1%，但其中很大一部分集中在零售、休闲和酒店等消费行业。其他百年企业还包括Twinings茶叶以及时尚品牌Barbour和Burberry。

这类似于所谓的“林迪效应”（Lindy effect），该理论以纽约的一家熟食店命名，认为某样事物存在的时间越长，它可能生存下去的时间就越长。但也有相反的例子。百货公司Debenhams曾挺过了拿破仑战争，但最终却毁于私募股权所有权，后者剥离了资产并使其背负沉重的租赁负债。该公司于2021年关闭了其在英国的所有门店。

这指向了乐观的第三个原因：Weston家族表示他们希望为“后代”改善Boots，他们可以对该业务采取长期视角，而无需承受私人投资者或公开市场的压力。既然已经走到了这一步，或许Boots也能迎来它的第三个世纪。

保质期

公司年龄在公司注册处有效登记册中的占比 (%)

“有效”登记册不包括处于清算或解散过程中的公司。来源：公司注册处（Companies House）

日经亚洲（NIKKEI Asia） 亚洲世纪之声 纵横字谜 第18,501号 作者：SLEUTH

便笺本 第18,500号答案

扫描二维码即可访问过去30天内的FT纵横字谜——包括隐喻谜题、博学者谜题、周末和周日谜题——或访问 ft.com / crosswordapp

横向

1 离开大片区域后，坎布里亚郡某地的绝佳湖区 (6) 4 可能在房屋植物周围被敲击的特殊事物 (8) 9 沿海警卫船中暴露出的混乱 (6) 10 柜台上的派对食物中极佳的供应 (8) 12 广播中歌手 Pat 的偏好 (4) 13 在纤细物品中发现的限制 (5) 14 凯尔特人使用暗示，时有时无 (4) 17 一个在巡演中划分岛屿群的角色伴侣？ (5,7) 20 男高音伴随几秒钟的广播，显示出虚伪 (3-9) 23 中国领导人处于法国人之中并准备离开 (4) 24 拥有许多病人的场所中严峻的紧缩迹象？ (5) 25 利物浦部分地区缺乏阳光的狗 (4) 28 某些研究的非直接有用描述？ (8) 29 此人对非洲国家的一项规则感到不安 (6) 30 圭亚那首都的临时车队 (8) 31 士兵们为痛苦的经历接受治疗 (6)

纵向

1 对非法付款的支持感到兴奋 (8) 2 对奥地利充满热爱的所谓公民 (8) 3 大使打断比赛中段？据说能引起注意 (4) 5 第二部作品？在款待精致人士时可能会引用这个 (12) 6 留意教育主持人 (4) 7 女儿漫步，时间流逝，在公园里散步？ (6) 8 导演，比如说，与合适的人一起出现，短暂停留？ (6) 11 督察与一对伙伴陷入其中，在部分地区心怀怨恨 (12) 15 黑暗中看不见的艳丽海报？ (5) 16 它们在英国城市中被首先拾起 (5) 18 在萨里郡城镇，作家否认了休闲的提示 (8) 19 发现于不同地点的特定欧洲研究所 (8) 21 晋升时减轻重量的东西会产生兴趣 (6) 22 疯狂的流氓操作员承受的压力 (6) 26 触碰柔软的材料 (4) 27 为项目宣布削减 (4)

FINANCIAL TIMES

另外 20 个案例研究，让利弗休姆勋爵安心

“我花在广告上的钱有一半被浪费了，麻烦在于我不知道是哪一半。”与勋爵不同，如今的品牌所有者无需焦虑。

来自今年 IPA 效果奖（IPA Effectiveness Awards）的 20 个案例研究就是最新的无可辩驳的证据。广告预算只要支出得当，就绝不会被浪费。扫描二维码，了解您应该如何支出您的预算。

Photo: Bryn Lennon / Getty Images

FT SCOREBOARD

Friday October 9 2026

The Business of

Formula 1

博塔斯内幕：从领奖台到发车格末尾，第 3 页 ▶ 红牛遗憾在首次尝试时就制造出了最好的发动机，第 2 页

伊朗战争增强了设立亚洲新赛道的理由

F1负责人警告称，现有主办赛道可能会在竞争投标中失利，作者：Rebecca Clancy

一级方程式赛车（F1）正在权衡来自几个亚洲国家的竞争投标，以在该地区增加一场比赛。由于伊朗战争，上周末该项赛事出人意料地回归马来西亚，这凸显了该地区强劲的需求。但根据F1首席执行官斯特法诺·多梅尼卡利（Stefano Domenicali）的说法，任何新场馆都必须取代现有的主办赛道之一，他表示目前没有将赛季扩展至当前24场比赛之外的计划。

马来西亚、泰国、越南和韩国是希望在赛历中获得一席之地的国家。土耳其大奖赛（位于伊斯坦布尔的亚洲侧）将于2027年回归，这意味着亚洲在下赛季将举办9场比赛，首次超过欧洲的8场。

“该地区的兴趣非常浓厚，”多梅尼卡利在接受《金融时报》采访时表示，此次采访是在本周末的新加坡大奖赛之前进行的。这位61岁的意大利人补充说，他的团队正在评估哪项提案能提供最强有力的长期方案。

在马来西亚本赛季出人意料地回归F1赛历后，成为主办方的竞争变得更加激烈。其雪邦赛道最后一次举办比赛是在2017, 年，此次被临时抽调以举办上周末推迟的巴林大奖赛。中东地区的战争导致原定于4月的比赛以及一周后的沙特阿拉伯大奖赛被取消。

多梅尼卡利表示，匆忙安排的马来西亚分站赛门票在短短三周内便售罄，证明了该项运动在该地区的受欢迎程度。“这太令人惊叹了，”他说，“想到我们上次在马来西亚是在2017年，而我们能够在如此短的时间内售罄门票，这意味着该地区的兴趣非常、非常浓厚。”

这种快速的接纳可能会帮助

在马来西亚匆忙安排的巴林大奖赛门票在短短三周内售罄，多梅尼卡利如是说

马来西亚在争取永久回归锦标赛中占据竞争优势。“我相当确信马来西亚人自己会尝试来到我们的谈判桌前，讨论未来的可能性，”多梅尼卡利说，但同时强调他尚未收到此类谈判将举行的保证。

此外，马来西亚将面临激烈的竞争。泰国近年来加大了成为主办国的努力，而越南和韩国也保持着浓厚兴趣。越南原定于2020年举办一场比赛，但因新冠疫情而取消，随后这座耗资£540mn的赛道被废弃。F1此前考虑过在中国增加第二场比赛的可能性，但随后予以拒绝。

多梅尼卡利表示，对任何未来主办方的评估将考察“最结构化且长期”的方案，标准包括基础设施、车迷兴趣、推广者的商业计划以及商业合作伙伴的机会。

伊朗战争造成的干扰也增加了另一个考量因素 续见第3页

赛中加油争议引发围场热议

这一极具争议的做法于1994年引入，并在2009赛季末因安全原因被禁止。随着F1考虑对2031年的赛车设计法规进行全面修订，该议题再次浮现。

此次重启旨在降低成本并减轻赛车重量以改善操控，同时计划回归更简单的发动机设计。第2页

一级方程式商业

法规 在经过四年的开发后，该车队首次使用了其自主研发的动力单元，但成功也伴随着弊端，作者：Jonathan Noble

红牛遗憾于首次尝试即打造出最佳引擎

在任何其他一级方程式（Formula 1）的规则体系下，拥有最强的引擎都应该是值得庆祝的事。但红牛在首次尝试自行制造动力单元的赛季中所取得的成就，事实证明却是一把双刃剑。

在经历了四年的引擎设计与制造后，红牛在转型为全厂队、赛季开启之前的预期较低。尽管如此，该车队在赛道上取得了一定的成功，上周末在马来西亚举行的巴林大奖赛中夺得首胜，且至今已进一步获得九次登上领奖台的机会。

然而，由于本赛季初作为引擎法规全面改革的一部分而引入的新规则，该车队无法继续提升引擎性能，反而被束缚了手脚。

根据今年生效的、管理动力单元开发的复杂“追赶”机制，F1的管理机构国际汽车联合会（FIA）认定，红牛在首次尝试中就击败了资历更深的竞争对手，制造出了最佳引擎。

这一被称为“额外开发与升级机会”（Aduo）的机制，旨在为任何制造商提供安全网，以便在针对2026赛季引擎规则变更而进行的动力单元全面重新设计过程中，纠正所犯的错误。

红牛目前与美国汽车制造商福特（Ford）合作，成为赛格中11支车队中第五支同时制造赛车和引擎的车队。但新机制意味着，虽然其竞争对手可以在本赛季和下赛季继续改进引擎，但红牛却不能。

这让这家奥地利车队感到沮丧，因为他们最初曾大力游说新引擎法规中的某些元素，而现在却受限于FIA及其评定方法的限制。

“我们对[FIA的调查结果]持有矛盾的想法。这令人惊讶，且与我们的数据分析相悖，并且[这]对该项目未来两年的开发产生了非常重大的影响，”红牛车队负责人劳伦特·梅基斯（Laurent Mekies）表示。

争议的核心在于，排名仅基于动力单元整体中的1个元素：内燃机。它们忽略了对圈速同样重要的其他关键组件，如电池功率和效率。FIA在本赛季多次予以反驳，坚持认为Aduo排名中使用的数据具有“高质量”，因此其测量结果是“准确的”。

但红牛并非唯一对该方法提出质疑的车队。梅赛德斯（Mercedes）公开表示其拥有最佳的整体动力单元，而目前的赛果表明这位冠军领先者的评估是正确的。

新规则意味着梅赛德斯被允许在今年进行一次赛季内升级，明年进行一次；而其余三家引擎制造商——法拉利（Ferrari）、本田（Honda）以及今年另一家新的动力单元制造商奥迪（Audi）——在本赛季和下赛季各有两次升级窗口。此外，红牛的所有四个竞争对手都被允许进行更多的工厂测试并获得额外的支出额度。

Aduo仅仅是FIA决定在本赛季要求引擎全面重新设计所引发的一系列争议之一。其他争议还包括涉及梅赛德斯的压缩比纠纷、旨在阻止过度能量管理的赛季中期变更，以及旨在将未来两年的重心从内燃机与电池功率50 / 50的分配中转移出去的新规则——而这一目标正是新法规的核心。

马克斯·维斯塔潘（Max Verstappen，左）在马来西亚赢得了红牛本赛季的首场胜利，让车队负责人劳伦特·梅基斯（Laurent Mekies，右）露出了笑容。Jakub Porzycki, Sona Maletterova / Getty Images

归根结底，红牛（Red Bull）成了自身成功的受害者。在16场比赛中获得一次马来西亚分站冠军、四次亚军和五次季军，在公司内部被视为其动力单元项目超出预期的证明。

前红牛领队克里斯蒂安·霍纳（Christian Horner）表示，这归功于贯穿整个团队的思维方式，而这种思维方式自该团队于2005.年进入这项运动以来，在撼动既有格局方面发挥了巨大作用。2021年，在霍纳向其同名所有者——奥地利能量饮料制造商的董事会推销成为完全集成工厂车队的愿景后，仅用了55周时间，其位于英国米尔顿凯恩斯的发动机工厂就投入了运行。

“我所做的就是将应用于底盘的同一套哲学应用于发动机，”霍纳说。“我们聚集了一群优秀的人才，其中一些人有点古怪，但我们让他们协同工作并坚信目标。”

梅基斯（Mekies）将这归功于最初所需的“冒险精神”，以

红牛围绕新规则设计其发动机工厂，而竞争对手则在改造现有工厂

批准一个他认为会被“世界上任何其他董事会拒绝”的项目。

红牛激进的招聘计划包括从竞争对手梅赛德斯（Mercedes）挖掘关键员工，例如技术总监本·霍奇金森（Ben Hodgkinson）和工程总监菲尔·普鲁（Phil Prew）。

其他因素也起到了作用。首先，部分由于红牛对国际汽联（FIA）的强力游说，新的2026年法规中加入了发动机研发的成本上限。

在之前的规则集下，部分制造商的发动机预算每年超过$500mn——这是红牛无法企及的。而新的上限将年度支出限制在$190mn。

通过从零开始，红牛能够围绕新法规设计其发动机工厂，而其竞争对手则必须改造现有的设施和流程。这种“白纸起步”的方法使其能够围绕办公中心设计子组件测试台，并购买最先进的设备来模拟完整的运行温度。

霍奇金森表示，另一个因素是红牛吸引的一系列人才，因为它是自21世纪初丰田（Toyota）以来，第一支从零开始启动发动机制造项目的F1车队。

它吸引了那些准备挑战既有思维、持有多元观点的工程师，他认为这对于激发创造力和创新至关重要——他将这一过程描述为一种“有机过滤”。

红牛决定制造自己的发动机是一场巨大的赌博。如果失败，后果可能会非常严重，在最坏的情况下，可能会导致明星车手、四届世界冠军马克斯·维斯塔潘（Max Verstappen）的离队。

梅基斯表示，对失败的恐惧已经消失，并坚称该项目“信心十足”。对于红牛来说，现在的挑战不在于已经完成的工作，而在于如何应对做得太好而带来的负面影响。这意味着在允许研发的有限领域内，为下个赛季寻求微小的提升。

“我们的空间将比竞争对手更小，因此我们只需要尝试更好地利用我们所拥有的更有限的空间。”

赛中加油能否回归？

这项运动此前加油时代的标志性画面：在1994年德国大奖赛上，由约斯·维斯塔潘驾驶的赛车被大火吞没 Alamy

或许业内人士反对加油最致命的论点，在于其对比赛产生的影响

乔纳森·诺布尔（Jonathan Noble）写道，在2031, 前全面改革赛车设计的计划中，这一极具争议的想法再次浮现

一级方程式（Formula 1）最新的全新规则时代可能才刚刚在本赛季开始，但人们的注意力已经转向即将取代它的重大重启。

在赛车重量不断增加的十多年后，目标是在2031年前减轻其重量，以改善驾驶员的操控感，从而给车迷带来更好的比赛体验。

下一次重启还旨在降低赛车的制造费用，包括计划用更简单的V8发动机设计取代目前的涡轮混合动力单元。

F1的高层正在寻找将赛车重量从略低于770公斤降低到700公斤以下的方法，以扭转过去25年几乎持续增长的重量趋势，使其回到2015年之前的水平。

然而，减轻车重的愿望与计划转向效率较低、且在完整比赛中需要更多燃料的V8发动机之间存在冲突。

监管机构正试图在减重目标与车队必须因增加燃料而增加额外载荷这一事实之间取得平衡，这就是为什么在进站期间加油这一极具争议的想法再次浮现。这一做法于1994, 首次引入，后因安全顾虑在2009赛季末被禁用。

多年来的车迷调查显示，他们支持恢复加油；而一些车手则怀旧地谈论起那种在进站人员为油箱加满油的时代里，标志性的惊险比赛。

当今年初被问及如今这项运动缺失了什么时，阿斯顿·马丁车手兰斯·斯特罗尔（Lance Stroll）表示：“我希望能处于一个像过去那样有加油、赛车轻盈、轮胎性能良好，且始终在全力冲刺的F1时代。”

但在围场内对此几乎没有支持，许多F1车队的高管抵制加油的回归。

在私下里，大多数人对这一前景感到恐惧，许多人指出了这项运动此前加油时代的标志性画面：在1994年德国大奖赛的维修区内，四届冠军马克斯的父亲约斯·维斯塔潘驾驶的赛车被烈火吞没。

此外还涉及财务方面。F1围场消息人士透露，设备成本加上在全球范围内运输燃料及相关设备的费用，可能会使车队的年度预算增加多达$5mn。在F1的成本上限制度下，许多车队不愿承担这项支出。

但或许业内人士反对加油最致命的论点，在于其对比赛产生的影响；尽管车迷怀念其回归，但几乎没有证据表明它能为观赏性增加任何价值。

Racing Bulls的首席执行官彼得·拜尔（Peter Bayer）在2017年至2022, 期间曾在F1管理机构国际汽车联合会（FIA）担任高级职务，他表示，多年来的常规分析几乎没有得出任何积极结果。

在8月下旬的荷兰大奖赛期间被问及此话题时，他解释道：“我记得在FIA工作期间，我们与Formula 1以及（前董事总经理）罗斯·布朗（Ross Brawn）成立了一个工作组，探讨如何提高娱乐性和观赏性。”

“一些人的一个大想法就是加油，我们深入挖掘了现有的历史影像和数据。”

“结果显示，除了少数几个非常壮观且危险的画面外，加油并没有给这项运动带来实质性的帮助，因为大多数超越行为突然间都发生在维修区内。”

威廉姆斯车队老板詹姆斯·沃尔斯（James Vowles）对此表示赞同。2009年，当赛车最后一次被允许在比赛中加油时，他担任冠军车队布朗GP（Brawn GP）的策略主管。

在与拜尔（Bayer）参加同一场活动时，他表示，作为加油时代的标志，那种全力以赴的竞速

最终反而降低了变数，因为车队被锁定在预定的圈数进站，失去了根据外部情况做出反应的灵活性。

沃尔斯补充说，由于竞争对手分析能力的巨大提升，现在的影响会更糟糕，因为车队能以更高的精度推断出对手的意图。

“你总是会把赛车的燃油量用到极限，因为那时速度最快，而这意味着现在你可以预测将要发生什么，”他说。

“如今，随着外部信息的公开，每个人都能获得这些信息。对我来说，这实际上在很大程度上削弱了比赛的悬念。”

尽管车队长期以来一直抵制，但国际汽联（FIA）已启动一项研究，以更好地了解在转向更轻量化赛车的同时，恢复加油制度是否会有益。

评估工作正在进行中。其最终结论几乎肯定取决于监管机构指定的V8发动机的最终配置。

如果V8发动机是自然吸气的，那么完成比赛距离将需要更多燃料，这将增强支持赛中加油的论点。然而，如果为了提高效率而保留较小的涡轮增压器，那么加油就不是必要的。

国际汽联单座赛车总监尼古拉斯·汤巴齐斯（Nikolas Tombazis）希望F1最终能达成一套让加油论点失效的规则。“我们通常不倾向于恢复加油，”他说。“目前还没有最终定论，但我们不想完全放弃涡轮增压。”

“我们希望保留高效的发动机，如果内燃机（ICE）端的马力增加，油耗会有所上升，但幅度不大。”

“我们认为，在其他方面节省下来的重量肯定会抵消大部分燃料增加带来的影响。赛车可能只会多携带约$20\mathrm{kg}$，也许是$25\mathrm{kg}$的燃料。”

“但如果赛车整体减轻了比如80kg，那么比赛起步依然会好得多。当然，在排位赛中你没有这个问题。”

汤巴齐斯知道，在规则最终确定以及加油问题得到最终解决之前还有很长的路要走，但他坚信F1最终减轻车重的目标是可以实现的。

“我们意识到，在讨论这些问题时，某些领域会出现反弹，我们必须做出一定的妥协，”他说。“人们会对某些成本感到担忧，但总体而言，我们的目标是将重量控制在700kg以下。我认为这将是让赛车更具吸引力的重要一步。”

F1圈内的许多人希望这种吸引力能够在不需要将加油设备重新搬回维修区的情况下实现。

从领奖台到发车格末端

访谈 瓦尔特里·博塔斯（Valtteri Bottas）

这位芬兰车手告诉 Rebecca Clancy，加盟 F1 最新车队凯迪拉克（Cadillac）让他经历了一个艰难的赛季。

对于一级方程式（Formula 1）车手来说，最难以面对的现实之一就是从争夺冠军转变为挣扎着完赛。虽然起跑线上有 22 辆赛车，但实际上只有少数几位车手能够期待夺冠。对于其他人而言，成功的衡量标准则有所不同，无论是登上领奖台、击败队友，还是仅仅不垫底。

很少有人比瓦尔特里·博塔斯更了解这种光谱的两端。这位 37 岁的芬兰人曾在梅赛德斯（Mercedes）统治时期的五个赛季中效力；在他从 2013 年起在顶尖赛场开启的职业生涯中，他赢得了 10 场大奖赛，并 67 次登上领奖台。

在目前的车手阵容中，只有三人的领奖台次数超过他。然而，博塔斯最后一次登上领奖台是在 2021 年，而本赛季他为 F1 最新车队凯迪拉克效力，该车队目前在车队积分榜上排名垫底，是唯一 1 支尚未得分的车队。

这种对比极其强烈。在梅赛德斯时期，博塔斯参加比赛时知道自己拥有获胜所需的机器。而在凯迪拉克，目标是建立一支能够与那些在赛车运动中深耕数十年的对手竞争的车队。“我知道这将是一个困难的一年，”他在上个月西班牙大奖赛前告诉《金融时报》（FT）。“这将涉及大量的故障排除、取得进展并尝试在每个领域步入正轨。”

凯迪拉克正试图同时完成几乎所有工作：建设工厂、制造赛车、研发 2029 年起使用的发动机，以及打造一种竞争文化。博塔斯表示，结果大致符合他的预期。

“我们确实看到每个周末在某些方面有所改进，”他说。“这未必体现在结果上，而体现在我们在不同领域作为一支团队的运作方式上。”

他对凯迪拉克在银石（Silverstone）的新设施尤为热情，博塔斯上个月访问了那里。他将这座工厂描述为他在 F1 中见过的最令人印象深刻的工厂。当被问及这里是否比梅赛德斯的设施更好时，他回答道：“我想是的。”

更大的挫败感来自于赛车的可靠性。在今年的 16 场比赛中，博塔斯有 8 场未能完赛。一次退赛会让车队遭受双重损失：首先是比赛结果，其次是因丢失圈数而未能收集到的数据。当赛车本身仍处于开发阶段时，每一公里都至关重要。

“一旦出现问题，无论是在练习赛还是排位赛，你就无法进步，”他说。“你只是在尝试修复问题，而不是专注于性能并让赛车跑得更快。”

博塔斯表示，在动力方面，他已经做好了为最新车队效力所需的心理调整。“最重要的是尝试最大限度地发挥自己的潜力，努力成为最好的自己，”他解释道。“周围的人也是一样。我试图确保他们也能最大限度地发挥潜力，倾尽所有。最终，这就是我们能做的一切。”

他坚持认为自己很享受这段经历。“我喜欢解决问题，”他说。“当然，我希望能参与到激烈的竞争中并争夺积分，但我知道今年会很艰难。”在梅赛德斯，首要任务是从一个成熟的、曾赢得冠军的体系中榨取出决定性的微小性能提升。而在凯迪拉克，他的反馈必须同时服务于多个时间维度。

“这不仅仅是考虑本周末，”他提到 9 月中旬在马德里的比赛时说道，“还包括什么能帮助我们在短期和长期内取得进步。在赛车开发方面，关键是要审视大局。”

这种经验是凯迪拉克在招募博塔斯的同时，也招募塞尔希奥·佩雷斯（Sergio Pérez）的原因之一，后者同样是一位了解起跑线前沿与末端的资深车手。两人都经历过作为一名多次世界

博塔斯在凯迪拉克享受这段经历：“当然，我很想在竞争中赛车并争取积分，但我知道今年会很艰难”

冠军——博塔斯曾在梅赛德斯车队与刘易斯·汉密尔顿搭档，而佩雷斯则在红牛车队与马克斯·维斯塔潘搭档。

博塔斯表示，这两位老将之间的关系很简单。“我们都曾在优秀的车队效力，也曾在这项运动中经历过更具挑战性的时期。我们都见识过什么行得通，什么行不通……我们知道，在目前这个阶段，我们需要把车队放在首位，而不是个人。”

对于凯迪拉克而言，博塔斯提供的不仅仅是工程方面的反馈。在他职业生涯的后期，他获得了一批忠实拥趸，展现出了一个比当年在汉密尔顿阴影下度过多年、性格内敛的芬兰人更为古灵精怪的公众形象。对于像凯迪拉克这样试图在拥有多种个性的拥挤全球体育赛事中建立自身身份的美国新晋者来说，这种知名度是非常宝贵的。

博塔斯在9月阿塞拜疆大奖赛排位赛后的样子。本赛季至今，这场比赛是他未能完赛的八场比赛之一。Altan Gocher / AFP via Getty Images

博塔斯也在构建一个除F1之外的身份。而在周日的新加坡大奖赛之后，他将短暂地在两者之间切换。

他并不打算立即前往下一场在奥斯汀举行的比赛，而是计划利用两周的间隔，直接从新加坡飞往阿德莱德。从那里，他将前往南澳大利亚的葡萄酒产区麦克拉伦谷（McLaren Vale），他和伴侣——澳大利亚职业自行车运动员蒂法尼·克伦威尔（Tiffany Cromwell）在那里拥有一座葡萄园并提供豪华住宿设施。“那里是天堂，”博塔斯说。

他计划在那里度过一周，然后返回F1。这次绕道让人们得以窥见博塔斯在赛车生涯之外所构建的生活，而当围场不再需要他时，这种生活将让他保持忙碌。

“我很久以前就开始考虑这件事了，”他说。“我一直知道这项运动不会永远持续下去，你必须为接下来的生活做好准备。”

博塔斯倾向于将资金投入到个人感兴趣的领域。咖啡就是其中之一。他是芬兰 Kahiwa Coffee Roasters 的合伙人；冰球是另一个——他是家乡职业俱乐部拉赫蒂鹈鹕队（Lahti Pelicans）的部分所有者，并担任其董事会成员。

在谈到冰球队伍时，他说：“我参与度相当高。但同样地，我可以选择自己的工作量，比如参加多少次会议，去看多少场比赛等等。”

这是一个多元化的投资组合，但它给了他一些F1——这项有着残酷日程和秒级判断的运动——很少能提供的东西：对时间的掌控。

“好在现在一切都已经安排好了，我可以选择自己的工作量以及在某些事情上的参与程度，”他说。“我已经规划了很多事情，这些绝对会让我在未来保持忙碌。”

人们很容易将其解读为在为退休做准备。博塔斯拒绝了这种暗示。他说他可能为F1之外的未来做了准备，但目前，他仍然想要赛车。

当被问及是否能想象到最终离开驾驶舱，但留在凯迪拉克帮助车队发展时，他的回答非常迅速。

“永远不要说绝不，但希望那一天还很遥远，”他说。“在我（在凯迪拉克）投入的所有艰苦努力之后，我最终希望能看到结果。”

他刚在8月满37岁，他指出近年来一些名将，如费尔南多·阿隆索和汉密尔顿，已经证明F1职业生涯可以延续到四十岁。“如果我拿自己和费尔南多或刘易斯相比，我应该还剩下几年时间。”

战争增强了设立新亚洲赛场的理由

2月伊朗袭击巴林美国海军基地的场景——Anadolu via Getty Images

（）

对于未来锦标赛的规划者而言：当地缘政治事件导致比赛无法进行时，需要具备调整赛历的灵活性。

虽然巴林站被移至马来西亚，但沙特阿拉伯大奖赛被取消且没有替代方案。中东地区的另外两场比赛——卡塔尔站和阿布扎比站——计划作为赛季收官战，多梅尼卡利在10月初坚持认为，尽管德黑兰和华盛顿能否就结束战争达成最终协议仍存在不确定性，但这两场比赛都将照常进行。

“我们的决定已经做出，”他说，“基于目前的情况，卡塔尔和阿布扎比的赛历已确认。”他补充说，这两场比赛的门票均已售罄。尽管如此，F1已制定应急方案，如果计划于12月初举行的阿布扎比赛季收官战在临近比赛时被取消，则将其移至其他地点。而卡塔尔站则没有替代方案。

“伊莫拉（Imola）是那个最终在特定日期前发生不可抗力时，能够准备好承办比赛的地方，”多梅尼卡利解释道，但他强调“重点非常明确地在卡塔尔和阿布扎比”。

他补充说，准备每个赛道所需的物流要求意味着，任何更改场地的决定必须在原定比赛日期前约一个月做出。

这场战争凸显了F1所有者自由媒体（Liberty Media）自2017年收购该赛车系列赛以来，推动这项运动进一步全球化所带来的风险。多梅尼卡利认为，与F1相关的物流复杂性使其比任何其他运动都更容易受到地缘政治的影响。

“我想说，没有多少运动拥有……像我们这样的复杂程度，”他解释道，“我们将成千上万的人员、数以吨计的物资日以继夜地从一个地方转移到另一个地方，这是另一回事。”

他说，本赛季为备用比赛所做的准备，为他的团队在未来需要为某场比赛寻找替代场地时提供了“坚实的基础”。“我想说，由于[处理]来自[潜在替代主办]国家的请求，我们现在的灵活性……甚至更强了。”

新赛道的竞争已迫使锦标赛中一些传统的欧洲分站提升竞争力

但他表示，这不应被视为 F1 正在建立一个正式的备用赛道网络。由于在门票销售、酒店、物流和组织方面需要大量投资，不能指望潜在的推广方在最后一刻之前一直处于待命状态。

不过他承认，增加与亚洲潜在主办方的互动将使 F1 “在未来如果……我们需要重新审视全球战略时，拥有不同的选择”。

F1 决定不增加每赛季 24 场比赛的上限，这给全球现有的主办方带来了更大压力。多梅尼卡利表示，近年来赛历的扩张以及新赛道的竞争，已经迫使锦标赛中一些传统的欧洲分站提升竞争力。

“即使是最资深的推广方……也被推着去提高其提供的服务质量，对我来说，这是最重要的一点。我的意思是，只有当你愿意为未来投资时，历史渊源才有价值，否则仅凭历史是不够的，”他补充道。“我们已经看到摩纳哥、蒙扎和银石发生了这种情况。在某种程度上，他们是被系统推动着去提高我们需要提供的服务质量。”

但 F1 赛历中增加一个新的亚洲主办赛道并不一定是以牺牲欧洲赛道为代价的。多梅尼卡利指出，新加坡的合同将在下赛季末到期，而日本和中国大奖赛的合同将分别在 2029 和 2030 赛季末到期。他补充说，最后一次举办 F1 赛事的印度（2013,）在短期内不具备可行性。

他说，该地区对这项运动的增长至关重要，但拒绝透露哪个潜在竞标者前景最好。“远东亚洲将是我们发展 F1 未来的领域之一……如果我们能够以正确的方式渗透这个市场的话。”

贡献者

Rebecca Clancy 自由撰稿人

Jonathan Noble 自由撰稿人

Mark Odell 委任编辑

Steven Bird 设计师

Esan Swan 图片编辑

广告详情请联系：Nikola Peros +33 (6) 2805 8404 nikola.peros@ft.com

本报告中的所有编辑内容均由 FT 制作。我们的广告商对文章没有影响力，也无法提前审阅。

更具竞争力的车阵扩大了赛车的吸引力

梅赛德斯的基米·安东内利（Kimi Antonelli，中）在还剩七场比赛的情况下，以 84 分的优势领跑车手积分榜 —— Mairo Cinquetti / NurPhoto via Getty Images

丽贝卡·克兰西（Rebecca Clancy）写道，新冠军的出现前景在商业上对广播公司和赞助商有利

在本世纪的大部分时间里，一级方程式赛车（Formula 1）的特点是由一名车手和一支车队主导的统治时期。迈克尔·舒马赫（Michael Schumacher）和法拉利在世纪之初连续赢得了五次车手冠军赛，十年后塞巴斯蒂安·维特尔（Sebastian Vettel）和红牛车队又连续夺冠四次。随后，梅赛德斯凭借刘易斯·汉密尔顿（Lewis Hamilton）掌控局面，直到红牛和马克斯·维斯塔潘（Max Verstappen）成为该项运动的主导力量。

虽然这些王朝期间有过中断，但持续的霸权一直是现代 F1 的一个反复出现特征。然而，在迈凯伦的兰多·诺里斯（Lando Norris）赢得上赛季冠军后，这项运动正面临连续第二个赛季出现新世界冠军的前景。在进入本周末的新加坡大奖赛且还剩七场比赛的情况下，梅赛德斯的基米·安东内利领先于队友乔治·罗素（George Russell） 84 分。

一个更具竞争力的车阵产生了一批更广泛的潜在获胜者——本赛季已有六名车手赢得分站赛冠军——这为广播公司、赞助商以及这项运动本身提供了更多可销售的故事。

体育与娱乐机构 The Team 的高级副总裁兼综合业务负责人斯科特·布兰奇（Scott Branch）表示：“过去两到三季竞争力的增强，无疑是 F1 在该时期商业价值提升的一个因素。”

一名统治级的冠军可能具有极高的市场价值。英国车手汉密尔顿的成功使他成为世界上最知名的运动员之一。荷兰车手维斯塔潘的连冠则创造了另一位全球巨星。

但统治地位也带有明显的体育风险：如果观众认为他们已经知道故事如何结束，那么观看的理由就会减少。一场激烈的冠军争夺战则提供了不同的体验。每一场比赛都可能改变冠军归属，而每位竞争者又带来了不同的粉丝群体、赞助商和国家利益。

“虽然一名统治级的车手能为这项运动提供一张全球面孔，但像安东内利、汉密尔顿、诺里斯、[查尔斯] 勒克莱尔（[Charles] Leclerc）和维斯塔潘这样的一群超级巨星，累积起来能为这项运动吸引一个规模大得多的粉丝群，”布兰奇说。“赛道上这种不可预测的竞争引导出贯穿整个赛季的叙事，能更长时间地吸引观众，并使广播和赞助价值保持上升趋势。”

对于广播公司而言，具有竞争力的冠军争夺战还会产生延伸至比赛日之外的故事线。队友之间的较量、个人背景故事以及年轻车手对资深冠军的挑战，都可以为电视、社交媒体和数字观众重新包装。

广播公司 Sky Sports 的 F1 总监比利·麦金蒂（Billy McGinty）表示：“我们即将迎来连续第二年出现新的 F1 世界车手冠军，而且本赛季到目前为止已经有五名不同的车手赢得了分站赛冠军。这种多样性带来了一种新鲜感和不可预测性，而这正是粉丝们希望从体育赛事中看到的。”

很少有车手能比冠军领跑者兼夺冠热门安东内利更好地诠释这一机遇。这位 20 岁的意大利人赛季开始时是其英国队友罗素的 2 号车手，而罗素在比赛开始前是博彩公司看好的夺冠热门。但结果却是这位意大利人脱颖而出，成为了体育和商业上的双重潜力股。

这位车手的迅速崛起还提供了一次极不寻常的、揭示意大利粉丝忠诚度的测试。法拉利在其本土市场占据独特地位，几代粉丝（tifosi）传统上无论谁在驾驶，都会追随那辆红车。安东内利使这种关系变得复杂。他的崛起让意大利观众拥有了一位能够赢得比赛的本土车手，尽管他效力于法拉利的德国竞争对手梅赛德斯。

在9月初的意大利大奖赛之前，意大利领先的体育报纸《米兰体育报》（La Gazzetta dello Sport）对读者进行了一项民意调查，结果显示了忠诚度的分歧。当被问及在蒙扎赛道是支持法拉利还是安东内利时，58.3 per cent的人选择了法拉利车队（Scuderia），而41.7 per cent的人支持这位梅赛德斯车手。

到比赛结束时，这种区分变得更加复杂，因为安东内利成为了自1966, 年以来首位在蒙扎主场大奖赛中夺冠的意大利人，这引发了习惯于为法拉利胜利欢呼的观众们的庆祝。安东内利的胜利吸引了平均 4.46mn 名意大利电视观众（涵盖Sky和TV8），高于一年前该场比赛的 3.08mn 名观众。

对于广播公司而言，安东内利的迅速崛起已经提供了除锦标赛排名之外的素材。麦金蒂（McGinty）表示：“本赛季也给了Sky Sports讲述令人兴奋的新故事的机会。例如，基米·安东内利在本赛季打破了一系列记录，我们的团队在记录被实时打破时进行报道，同时通过剪辑和反应视频为我们的社交和数字渠道提供内容。”

比赛获胜者的多样化与观众人数的增长同步出现。上赛季，当英国车手诺里斯（Norris）结束维斯塔潘（Verstappen）连续四年的世界冠军统治时，成为了Sky Sports在英国和爱尔兰有记录以来观看人数最多的F1赛季，产生了1.62亿小时的观看时长。从维斯塔潘统治的2023, 年到诺里斯加冕的2025, 年，观看人数增长了14 per cent。

这种持续的讨论在商业上至关重要。在美媒集团Liberty Media的所有权下，F1的转型部分依赖于将一系列比赛转化为在整个周内且跨多个平台消费的娱乐产品。

一个真正具有竞争力的锦标赛让F1拥有更多此类叙事，而无需人为制造。

赞助商同样受益。当多支车队都有可能获胜时，商业合作伙伴就有更多机会将自己与成功联系在一起。布兰奇（Branch）表示：“随着合作伙伴品牌拥有更多可信的途径进入获胜时刻并获得文化相关性，更多车队的自身价值得到了提升。”

这一论点也有其局限性。体育王朝本身也能吸引大量观众。统治级的冠军为普通粉丝提供了一个易于识别的领军人物，而看到一个看似不可战胜的车手被击败的前景，本身也可以成为一个引人入胜的叙事。

汉密尔顿（Hamilton）的统治时期恰逢F1在Liberty Media领导下的快速国际扩张，而维斯塔潘的成功也并未妨碍这项运动吸引赞助商、推广者和观众。

同样，仅靠激烈的竞争无法保证商业增长。F1的扩张还受到新赛道（尤其是美国和中东地区）、更强大的数字化存在以及将车手从头盔后的匿名人物转变为个性化人物的娱乐策略的推动。

但不确定性提供了一些营销无法轻易制造的东西：危机感。

因此，对于F1来说，具有商业吸引力的结果可能既不是永久的统治，也不是随机性，而是一个由知名明星组成、且他们能够可信地击败彼此的起跑线。

这使得锦标赛本身更容易销售。F1不再是询问是否有人能阻止一名统治级车手，而是在每个周末提供一个更有价值的问题——谁将获胜？

F1 正在远离欧洲。英国能否守住剩余的部分？

观点

Paolo Aversa

在过去的十年里，一级方程式赛车（F1）的赛事版图在悄然之中被重新绘制。随着所有者 Liberty Media 将这项运动全球化并追求更高的营收，其欧洲核心地带正在萎缩。

欧洲在 9 月迎来了马德里——这座西班牙首都在时隔 45 年后重新回到了 F1 赛历——并且在下赛季将迎来葡萄牙的波蒂芒（Portimão）。但欧洲失去了意大利的伊莫拉（Imola），并将从 2027 年起失去荷兰的赞德福特（Zandvoort）；而比利时的斯帕-弗朗科尔尚（Spa-Francorchamps）作为该运动最具标志性的赛道之一，将与西班牙的巴塞罗那每年轮流举办赛事。

2027 年土耳其大奖赛的回归（在伊斯坦布尔的亚洲侧举行）意味着下赛季亚洲将举办 9 场比赛，首次超过欧洲的 8 场。

尽管 F1 首席执行官斯特法诺·多梅尼卡利（Stefano Domenicali）向车迷保证德国大奖赛将会回归，但许多传统主义者看到了一个明显的趋势：随着 F1 拥抱出价更高的主办方，欧洲正在失去其主导地位。

但他们哀悼的是一张错误的地图。

F1 始终拥有两种地理维度。第一种是表演发生的地方：赛事。这一地理维度正在迅速全球化，而这在情理之中：据分析师估计，海湾地区的主办方每年向 Liberty Media 支付的赛事费用约为 $50mn，是大多数欧洲推广方出价的两倍。

第二种是赛车制造的地方：产业。这一地理维度在历史上是集群分布的。自第二次世界大战以来，F1 赛车的设计和制造集中在牛津与北安普顿之间的一片英国乡村地带。

尽管意大利位于艾米利亚-罗马涅大区的“汽车谷”（Motor Valley）依然是法拉利（Ferrari）、赛车牛（Racing Bulls）和达拉拉（Dallara）在 F1 的所在地，但英国集群目前仍是该运动的主要重心。

这片被称为“赛车谷”（Motorsport Valley）的地带是 11 支车队中 6 支车队总部的所在地：梅赛德斯位于布拉克利（Brackley），红牛位于米尔顿凯恩斯（Milton Keynes），阿斯顿·马丁位于银石（Silverstone），威廉姆斯位于格罗夫（Grove），阿尔派位于恩斯通（Enstone）以及

麦克拉伦位于沃金（Woking）。即使总部设在英国以外的车队也在“赛车谷”保留了一席之地：哈斯（Haas）在班伯里（Banbury）运行关键业务；赛车牛在米尔顿凯恩斯设有技术中心；而新加入者凯迪拉克（Cadillac）和奥迪（Audi）则分别在银石和比斯特（Bicester）建立了英国基地和技术中心。赛车工业协会（Motorsport Industry Association）估计，更广泛的英国赛车和工程服务行业的年产值达 160亿英镑，并支撑着 50,000 个就业岗位。

这一切并非计划而然。该集群的起源可以追溯到业余爱好者在废弃的战时机场（包括银石）驾驶自制赛车的时代。查尔斯·库珀（Charles Cooper）及其儿子约翰在瑟比顿（Surbiton）的一个车库里制造了小型后置发动机赛车，并在 1959 年和 1960 年连续赢得 F1 世界冠军。科林·查普曼（Colin Chapman）在伦敦北部的一个车库里组装了他的第一辆路特斯（Lotus），随后赢得了七次车队冠军。

两种机制至今仍在驱动“赛车谷”。人才在垂直方向上晋升，从卡丁车维修区和俱乐部赛事进入专业车队；同时在水平方向上流动，工程师在竞争对手之间流动，传播着任何专利都无法捕捉的知识。热情将人们锚定在特定地点。这就是集群具有粘性的原因，也是为什么这个集群自 20 世纪 50 年代以来能够在每一次规则、所有权和时尚的变革中幸存下来的原因。

这也是为什么对赛历的焦虑偏离了重点。举办赛事和制造赛车是两个不同的市场：一个向全球观众销售奇观；另一个通过先进工程驱动经济价值，其收益和知识转移的影响力超出了 F1 和赛车运动本身。

意大利证明了这一点。它失去了伊莫拉，但其生产基地依然繁荣：法拉利在马拉内罗（Maranello），赛车牛在法恩扎（Faenza），以及在瓦拉诺-德-梅莱加里（Varano de' Melegari）的达拉拉——后者设计哈斯的 F1 底盘，制造凯迪拉克的耐力赛原型车，并为每一辆 F2、F3 和 IndyCar 提供供应。

一个国家可以失去赛事，但保留工厂。意大利目前两者兼有，而英国的情况则更为显著：大多数车队和供应商、F1的伦敦总部，以及直到2034年的银石赛道英国大奖赛均在此。问题在于，其工程集群能否继续保持世界领先地位。

历史在变，没有空间也没有时间让人们自满。“赛车谷”（Motorsport Valley）的掌控力已经在减弱：从2029年起，通用汽车将在北卡罗来纳州制造凯迪拉克（Cadillac）的发动机；奥迪将其工厂计划设在欧洲大陆；而Dallara则不断赢得车队选择不内部完成的外包工作——哈斯（Haas）和凯迪拉克就是两个例子。

与此同时，英国国内的摩擦正在增加，高于其他地区的生活成本阻碍了国际人才移居该国，此外，能源、制造以及对任何F1车队都至关重要的外国工程师签证成本也在上升。集群很少会剧烈崩溃，它们是在一次次外包合同中悄然侵蚀的。问问底特律就知道了。

对于英国政策制定者来说，解决方案是将“赛车谷”视为战略基础设施，而非一项文化遗产奇观。政府已经为数字技术和艺术领域提供快速办理签证，并为顶尖车手作为国际运动员提供便捷通道。然而，特别是在脱欧之后，那些让车手及其车队成为冠军的工程师们必须与其他人一样排队。将这种认可扩展到赛车工程领域将是一个强有力的举措。

此外，F1的研发应享有与航空航天工业同级别的国家支持，政府还应支持金字塔底层的业余层面，例如卡丁车运动。我的研究表明，政府无法通过立法凭空创造一个集群，这是由热情驱动的。但政策决定了下一个库珀（Cooper）车库是始于瑟比顿（Surbiton）、康科德（Concord）还是瓦拉诺（Varano）。

作者是伦敦国王学院国王商学院的战略学教授

金融职业指南：学生手册

Friday October 9 2026

www.ft.com / reports / @ftreports

早起步，快行动，高目标

内页：顶尖职位的竞争加剧，Page 2

FT Schools 由以下机构支持：

NOMURA

金融素养 开启无限可能

扫描二维码，了解更多关于 Nomura 金融教育计划的信息

撰稿人

Alan Livsey 代理养老金记者

Kimberley Long 《银行家》(The Banker) 亚洲编辑

Alice Kantor 自由撰稿人

Emma Dunkley 资产管理记者

Dunya Simões 新闻副编辑

Jonathan Moules 时事通讯作者兼编辑

Emma Boyde 委约编辑

Øivind Hovland 插画师

Steven Bird 设计师

Alan Knox, Esan Swan 图片编辑

广告详情请联系：Sunny Sun, sunny.ningsun@ft.com, +81 903207 7568

本报告中的所有编辑内容均由 FT 制作。我们的广告商对文章没有影响力，也无法提前审阅。

金融职业指南：学生手册

顶尖金融职位的竞争加剧

申请流程：业内人士建议学生早起步、快行动，Alan Livsey 报道

曾经，只要有一位人脉广泛的亲戚推荐，就能让你获得伦敦或纽约金融机构实习职位的面试机会。只要说对几句话，你就能开启在保险或经纪领域的职业生涯。

如今，即使是人脉最广的准经纪人和银行家也无法依赖这种奢侈。不过，现在有其他途径可以寻求帮助。对于那些寻求灵感的人来说，FinTok（关于金融和投资的 TikTok）和 YouTube 视频可以帮助你熟悉这门“语言”。

对于那些觉得自己已经具备一定知识的求职者，面向专业人士的社交媒体网站 LinkedIn 可以帮助新入行者直接联系高薪的投资银行、交易集团和基金管理公司。

但在 LinkedIn 上寻找合适的人脉可能很困难，大多数候选人需要比几个免费视频更多的东西，才能在竞争对手中获得优势。

好消息是，有一些专业的招聘机构和工具可以帮助你踏上金融职业阶梯。

在美国，Handshake 等网站将求职者与包括金融在内的各行业招聘人员联系起来，提供关于华尔街和其他全球金融中心有薪实习和毕业生职位的信息。实习可以转化为全职工作。

Randy Tarnowski 是 Handshake 的研究总监，他指出金融职位的竞争已经加剧。他表示，根据 Handshake 的数据，去年每个美国投资银行实习职位的申请人数达到 382 人，是非金融实习职位收到申请人数的三倍多。

在英国，由 James Uffindell 创立的 Bright Network 提供了有用的工具，例如一个针对毕业生职位的在线工作和实习网站。

“主要挑战在于时机。你必须在实习职位发布后的几天内提交申请”

现金入账还是拓展分支：行业专家详解如何开启银行从业之路

银行业

金伯利·隆（Kimberley Long）写道，银行业欢迎不同的背景，岗位多样，且并不总是需要大学学位。

当你想到在银行工作的人时，脑海中会浮现什么？是一个在分行担任出纳的人，还是一个帮助客户办理贷款或抵押贷款的人？或者，你可能会想象一名坐在办公桌后的银行高管，或者从事一份高压工作，通过买卖股票赚大钱的人。

事实上，银行业涵盖了上述所有角色，以及许多不那么显而易见的岗位，例如所谓的供应链金融。如果没有这项确保工厂和运输公司获得付款的工作，我们需要的商品就无法在全球范围内运输。或者，你可以考虑风险管理岗位，该岗位专注于尝试将银行可能遭受的潜在损失风险降至最低，例如当借款人无法偿还贷款时。

那么，你可以从事什么样的工作？可以说，了解有哪些机会的最佳方式是直接咨询银行。

在英国，知名银行经常提供工作体验和开放日。例如，劳埃德银行（Lloyds Bank）在全国各地于周末举办 Skillsfest 活动，邀请 14 至 19 岁的学生及其家长参观办公室，并听取员工讲述他们的工作。如果你无法前往这些地点，该银行在每月第一个周二还会举办在线职业直播（Careers Live）活动，且之前的录像可在该银行的 YouTube 频道上观看。

与此同时，汇丰银行（HSBC）面向全球学生，并在英国和香港宣传职业活动。

通常，银行会在其网站的职业页面上发布机会，因此定期检查这些页面并给自己留出充足的申请时间是一个好主意。

一旦你确定了感兴趣的职业方向，下一步就是弄清楚达到该目标需要什么样的资质。

如果你计划就读大学，在银行获得一份工作并不总是意味着你需要拥有数学或商业学位。国民西敏寺银行集团（Nat-West Group）首席人力资源官玛丽亚·科基努（Maria Kokkinou）表示：“我们最近在英国银行迎来了 300 多名新毕业生。他们来自各种不同的专业，包括心理学、历史学和英国文学，以及数学、生物学和物理学。”

对于某些工作，你不需要上大学。劳埃德银行为完成英国学生通常在 16 岁左右参加的国家考试的学生提供学徒制，并支持学习 T-level（一种针对工业领域的、替代传统 A-level 离校考试的课程）的年轻人，在他们学习期间提供为期 45 天的行业实习。

许多银行为离校学生提供岗位，甚至提供在职学位

金融职业指南：学生手册

同样重要的是，它提供了参加招聘会及其自有 Bright Network 节等社交活动的渠道。Uffindell 表示：“我们为候选人和会员提供的所有服务均免费，由我们的 300 多家雇主合作伙伴出资。”

通常情况下，很少有专业招聘人员会寻找更年轻的申请人，因为招聘人员根据客户的起薪赚取费用，而入门级职位的薪资往往较低。一个例外是总部位于伦敦的 Dartmouth Partners，该公司在美国纽约和夏洛特设有办公室，并在香港设有分支机构。据 Will Munn 称，仅在伦敦，他的早期职业团队每年就收到 65,000 份简历。

这些计划可能竞争非常激烈。为了获得这些职位，证明你在考试成绩之外的兴趣和技能至关重要。

一种实现方法是通过短期体验式实习，例如英国主要金融和会计公司向本科生提供的 Spring Week。申请截止日期通常在几个月前，因此提前规划非常重要。其中一些仅面向即将完成学业的人员开放，因此请检查申请资格标准。

当你还不认识业内人士时，了解银行希望看到的技能类型可能很难，而这正是 upReach（英国）以及在英国和法国开展业务的 Sponsors for Educational Opportunity (SEO) 等组织发挥作用的地方。

SEO 建议尽可能早地思考未来的职业生涯。它为 15 岁及以上的学生提供学校支持，并为来自较低社会经济背景的学生提供名为 Ignite 的为期一周的计划。

当他在 2018 年加入时，Dartmouth 专注于大型投资银行的销售和交易职位。此后，他注意到重心已转向基金管理领域的安置。Munn 表示，对于 Dartmouth 为其城市（City）和华尔街客户运行的实习生和毕业生计划，申请人数在过去两年中每年增长约 35%。

虽然 Dartmouth 在吸引人才方面没有问题，但雇主本身必须付出更多努力。Munn 表示：“公司必须更加努力地让自己脱颖而出，”他补充说，一些候选人渴望了解雇主的文化，以便感受在那里工作的氛围，以及实习转化为全职工作机会的可能性。

Dartmouth 确保获得

“招聘会……是花 10 分钟向我们的员工提出所有问题的绝佳机会”正式实习或毕业生计划名额的流程可能需要六周时间，开始时可能有 200 名候选人进行电话面试，100 人进入实时视频阶段，然后约 30 名候选人被送往客户进行最终面试阶段，包括技术能力的实际测试。

一名来自伦敦政治经济学院的年轻毕业生表示，Dartmouth 帮助她与招聘人员建立了联系，但她和她的同辈也依赖 Trackr 来获取最新的金融实习和毕业生计划列表。该网站被组织成一个大型交互式电子表格，来自银行、“量化”交易员（依赖数学或定量数据开发自动化交易策略）——对冲基金、资产管理公司和精品金融咨询公司等雇主的信息每天甚至每小时都在更新。该网站提供了申请链接，使候选人能够快速行动。

一旦你确定了感兴趣的职业，请计算出你需要什么样的资格证书 seb-ra / Getty Images

该毕业生表示，速度至关重要。Trackr 的更新如此频繁，以至于她和所有的朋友都在不断检查该网站。“最大的挑战是时机。你必须在实习机会发布后的几天内提交申请。”

伦敦职位的竞争可能非常激烈，部分原因是欧洲大陆的学生也渴望这些工作，且有时拥有更丰富的经验和更成熟的心智。“申请的人中欧洲人更多（通常年龄更大），”她指出。而且他们非常积极。她遇到的一位女性为了参加一次实习活动专门从葡萄牙飞过来。

Trackr 的创始人兼首席执行官 Sam Leong 表示，公司收到海量申请的部分原因是像 Trackr 这样将搜索过程数字化的网站取得了成功。

在英国以外，全球许多银行都提供毕业生计划，在某些国家甚至还有针对中学毕业生的项目。瑞士的瑞银集团（UBS）为高中毕业生提供为期 18 个月的银行入门计划，以及相关活动和体验日。与此同时，在新加坡，华侨银行（OCBC）和星展银行（DBS）都为理工学院学生提供学徒制，这可以转化为正式工作。

一名常驻香港的银行招聘人员 Rob Darling 表示，该地区的大多数银行都在寻找拥有学位的申请者。尽管如此，年龄在 15 到 29 岁之间且尚未获得大学水平资格的年轻人，可以通过香港政府的青年就业及培训计划寻找银行工作。

建立一个由行业从业者组成的人脉网络可以帮助你了解职位信息，并在机会出现时获得提醒。

大多数金融职位的招聘出现在 9 月至 11 月期间，1 月份会有较小的一波。Leong 表示，Trackr 上的 918 个金融项目中，有 94% 按照先到先得的原则审核申请者。

虽然建立人脉听起来可能令人畏缩，但你可以从已经认识的人开始。SEO 的运营总监 Louise Preston 表示，该组织会与年轻人一起进行练习，通过家人和朋友梳理出他们在不同职业领域认识的人。将自己的同龄人群体视为一个网络同样重要，因为你们可以在未来互相帮助建立联系或寻找职位。

Leong 表示，一些公司在几小时内就会填满人才储备库，并补充说他听说资产管理公司施罗德（Schroders）在收到 1,000 份申请后就会关闭申请通道，“而仅 Trackr 一个平台在 24 小时内就能发送这么多申请”。

然而，施罗德的新兴人才主管 Hannah Tupper 否认了施罗德设定上限的说法。“我们根据单个项目的需求采取动态方法……而不是执行严格的申请上限，”她说。但她补充道，公司近年来的申请量显著增加，并承认在职位发布后的几分钟内就可能开始收到申请。

Bright Network 的 Uffindell 为那些刚刚开始寻找工作的人提供了这些关键建议：尽早开始并申请。磨练你的演示技巧并享受这段经历。此外，做好准备——一些面试官会测试技术技能。你可能会面对一个包含数据的案例，并被要求对杠杆收购进行建模。

参加招聘会和社交活动（包括在大学里），以结识行业人士和招聘人员。不要忘记寻找那些在金融行业有经验且地位显赫的家庭朋友，他们通常很乐意提供建议。

最后，不要害怕脱颖而出。正如一名伦敦金融城的高级分析师所说：“他们是否对事物感兴趣？是否会提问？比起他们是否掌握知识，我更在意他们是否真正聪明。”

LinkedIn 也可以是一个有用的工具，能帮助你与在实习或工作经验安置期间结识的专业人士保持联系。

upReach 的金融服务初级项目经理 Sasha Black 补充道，对于学生来说，许多大学设有针对金融职业兴趣者的社团，让你能够结识其他对相同职业感兴趣的人。

汇丰银行（HSBC UK）新兴人才负责人伊恩·希思（Iain Heath）表示，即使是与当地分行工作人员进行一次简短的交谈，也能帮助你了解他们的工作内容。

他表示：“学校和大学的职业招聘会是一个绝佳的机会，你可以花10分钟时间向我们的员工提出你能想到的所有问题。”

金融职业：学生指南

拜约挂毯（Bayeux Tapestry）在今年夏天首次在近1,000年间来到英国时，投保金额为£800mn。这笔巨额资金引发了讨论 —— WPA Pool / Getty Images

保险业保障广泛的职业选择

风险管理 爱丽丝·坎托尔（Alice Kantor）写道，调查团队与数据分析师以及面向客户的工作同样重要

今年夏天，拜邑挂毯（Bayeux Tapestry）在近 1,000 年来首次来到英国，它在政府的一项计划下获得了价值 £800mn 的承保。

这笔巨额资金在媒体上引发了讨论，但同时也凸显了保险职业的一个关键要素——计算出某些事情可能出错的风险，以及如果出错将产生多少成本。

从本质上讲，所有保险的运作方式都大体相同。客户被邀请向保险公司支付相对较少的金额，如果发生意外，保险公司将支付数额大得多的赔偿金。

全球保险市场劳合社（Lloyd's）的人事主管内森·亚当斯（Nathan Adams）表示，保险业涵盖了广泛的专业领域。

为了给保险单定价，一名被称为“核保员”（underwriter）的人员必须评估某种可能性，例如房屋被淹或卫星在太空中被碎片击中的概率。他们还必须评估该损失的可能成本。然后，就可以制定保单价格，其中还会考虑到投保客户的数量。

该行业的另一个分支负责理赔，例如决定谁应对汽车碰撞负责，并评估损失程度。

保险专业人士也可以从事再保险工作，即保险公司为其承诺赔付的保单再次购买保险。

精算师利用统计建模、金融理论和概率来预测未来风险、设计保单，并确保公司有足够的资金支付未来的理赔请求。

经纪人就风险敞口向客户提供建议，与核保员协商条款（由核保员决定保险公司是否应承担该风险），并构建定制化的承保方案。

“许多人会对保险职业的多样性感到惊讶，”亚当斯说道。

该行业招募具有各种学术背景的人才。亚当斯表示，好奇心、适应能力和终身学习等品质比特定的学位或资格证书更重要。

他说：“因为风险触及社会的每一个部分，所以该行业需要具有广泛学术背景、经验和视角的人才。”

代表伦敦保险企业的官方贸易机构——伦敦市场集团（London Market Group）首席执行官卡罗琳·沃格斯塔夫（Caroline Wagstaff）表示，许多人通过学徒制和其他离校计划进入该行业，无需多次实习或连续签署短期合同。

沃格斯塔夫表示，许多全球保险公司、再保险公司和经纪行提供结构化的毕业生计划和学徒制，提供在核保、理赔和风险管理等部门的轮岗机会。

早职业社交平台 Bright Network 的首席营销官凯里·西蒙斯（Kerry Simmons）认为，在保险职业的不同阶段，追求公认的专业资格——例如伦敦特许保险协会（Chartered Insurance Institute）或风险管理协会（Institute of Risk Management）提供的资格——是很常见的，且通常可以在工作中同步完成。

她表示，喜欢挖掘信息并查明事实真相的人可能适合在保险调查团队工作，而喜欢分析风险并基于证据做出决策的人可能会被核保或精算工作所吸引。

“从摇滚明星到太空火箭，从台风到恐怖主义，[保险] 提供保护”

西蒙斯还指出了 AI 如何改变其中一些岗位的执行方式。她补充道：“了解自己的擅长之处和热爱之所在，是确定该行业哪个部分适合你的起点。”

至于是否必须具备卓越的数学天赋或统计学学位，沃格斯塔夫表示这取决于具体岗位。

精算工作侧重于数据和分析，可能需要应用科学学位以及扎实的编程语言基础。

其他岗位，尤其是经纪业务，涉及更多与客户及消费者的互动。

“建立关系并与全球客户紧密合作的能力在这一行业中备受追捧，”沃格斯塔夫（Wagstaff）表示。

该行业的一个优势在于，这一职业触及方方面面，并具有现实世界的影响力。

“从摇滚明星到太空火箭，从台风到恐怖主义，[保险]在人们最需要的时候为个人和企业提供保障，”她说道。

英国仍然是专业商业保险最重要的市场。虽然就规模而言，英国并非最大的市场——美国拥有最多的国内消费者——但在某些细分领域，英国处于全球领先地位。

沃格斯塔夫表示，该行业的另一个优点是工作与生活的平衡。

“整体而言，这个行业以‘粘性’强而著称，”沃格斯塔夫补充道。“一旦开始从事保险工作，人们往往会在该领域度过职业生涯的大部分时间。”

至于薪资，英国毕业生就业网站 Prospects 的战略关系主管及早期职业专家克里斯·里亚（Chris Rea）表示，起薪往往比金融业其他一些领域更为低调，但具有获得丰厚奖金和强劲职业晋升的潜力。

根据 Prospects 的数据，英国的承保实习生起薪在 2.4 万英镑 至 3.5 万英镑 之间，取得资格后可升至 3.5 万英镑 至 6.5 万英镑 之间，而在高级职位上则可超过 10 万英镑。

里亚表示，对于拥有强大数字化技能的人才，尤其是在数据分析和人工智能（AI）等领域，竞争非常激烈。

“不要被对保险业过时的认知所误导，这个行业充满活力，岗位需求技能多样，且行业正在积极寻找新人才，”他说道。

雇主寻求个性与技能

资产管理：艾玛·邓克利（Emma Dunkley）表示，随着职能多样化，雇主正在扩大招聘范围

如果你认为金融业的工作会带来巨额奖金、私人飞机和超级游艇，那么你想象的可能是只有最高薪的资产管理人员才能继续享有的回报。

然而，这个规模达数万亿加元的行业提供了多样化的职位，范围涵盖从管理养老金计划和投资基金，到数据分析或协助管理富裕家庭的资金。

无论是高中毕业生还是本科生，都有就业机会，且该行业可以作为进入银行等其他部门的跳板。

金融招聘公司 Dartmouth Partners 的董事总经理利齐·路易斯（Lizzie Louis）解释说，进入资产管理领域的路径“比许多人意识到的要宽广”。她解释道，除了投资岗位，该行业还需要技术、风险管理以及面向客户的岗位等领域的专业知识。

招聘专家表示，为了获得这些职位，潜在雇主在考察时已不再仅仅关注学术成绩。

美国招聘公司 Robert Half 的合同财务与会计全球执行董事布兰迪·布里顿（Brandi Britton）表示：“那些能够展示……技术知识，同时具备强大沟通能力和适应力的人，在入门级人才中可能会脱颖而出。”

她表示，建立人脉是了解不同职业路径并在过程中建立关系的最佳方式之一。“参加行业活动或寻求信息交流可以提供招聘公告中并不总是可见的见解，并能帮助毕业生在决定下一步行动时做出更明智的选择。”

根据全球领先的商学院非营利组织——研究生管理入学委员会（Graduate Management Admission Council）对 4,000 多名潜在学生的调查，35% 的商学院研究生申请者希望在资产管理和投资银行领域工作。

在亚洲，迅速扩大的中产阶级和日益增长的养老需求催生了一个快速增长的资产管理行业。Amova 的高级企业官兼全球人力资源负责人成代丰（Tomoya Narikiyo）表示，这有助于在“广泛的职能领域为毕业生创造机会”。

他说：“对于希望进入该行业的毕业生来说，优秀的学术成绩依然重要，但雇主越来越看重好奇心、适应力、韧性以及学习意愿。”

总部位于英国、致力于连接毕业生与雇主的组织 Bright Network 的首席执行官基尔斯滕·巴恩斯（Kirsten Barnes）表示，进入资产管理领域的路径遵循一个固定模式：大学一年级参加见习日（insight days），二年级参加暑期实习，然后在第三年或最后一年申请毕业生计划。她指出，优秀的实习表现通常会直接导致获得毕业生工作录取，或让候选人在招聘过程中获得快速通道。

她观察到：“最大的挑战之一是许多学生没有意识到这段旅程开始得如此之早。”

她补充道：“那些在最后一年才开始准备的候选人，往往是在与那些已经花费两三年时间建立商业意识、积累相关经验并证明对该行业有真实兴趣的同龄人竞争。”

许多资产管理公司会寻找特定的技能和特质。

“我会建议学生在生活的方方面面尝试使用 AI，并愿意进行实验并就此进行讨论”

Aberdeen Investments 表示，在筛选候选人简历和面试时，该公司“始终寻找好奇心、协作能力和积极主动的自驱动力的证据”。“候选人的个性至关重要。”

全球最大的基金集团贝莱德（BlackRock）表示，其招聘方式已有所“演变”，不再那么关注特定的学位专业，而更多地关注“支撑成功”的特质，例如好奇心、批判性思维和学习意愿。

该集团表示：“如今，我们在英国的客户和产品实习生中，有超过 50 per cent 来自非商业、金融或经济背景；而在这些业务部门的英国分析师中，这一比例超过 60 per cent。这反映了我们的信念，即人才可以产生于广泛的学术领域和经验之中。”

资产管理公司施罗德（Schroders）的全球人才、包容性与员工体验主管斯蒂芬妮·阿什莫尔（Stephanie Ashmore）表示，该公司正在扩大其早期职业计划，“以增加整个业务部门可获得的机会数量，特别是在我们的客户面对面团队和投资团队中”。

阿什莫尔指出，公司采用一种“基于技能的招聘方式”，关注潜力、优势和能力，而非学术背景或过往经验。施罗德为离校学生运行一项学徒计划，且超过半数的学徒在计划结束后留在了公司。

与此同时，人工智能（AI）的快速进步加剧了申请者之间的竞争，并使公司面临远多于以往的潜在候选人。

投资管理专业人士协会 CFA 协会的高级总监彼得·沃特金斯（Peter Watkins）警告称，如果毕业生不了解金融基础，那么使用 AI 进行申请“是没有效果的”。

他说：“在我们对雇主进行的调查中，他们表示‘我们希望招聘人员能够进行财务报表分析，他们需要精通 Excel，需要了解主要资产类别的特征’。”

但他补充说，雇主也在寻找对 AI 的熟悉程度：“因此，我建议学生在生活的各个领域尝试使用 AI，并愿意进行实验并就此进行讨论。”

从根本上说，招聘专家认为毕业生仍必须努力争取行业内的实践经验。

总部位于英国的招聘公司罗伯特·沃尔特斯（Robert Walters）的副总监利兹·麦基弗（Liz McKeever）表示：“只要能获得经验，就立刻去做。”

她补充道：“经验、博览会和活动——主动申请实习或跟岗学习，因为你必须脱颖而出。”

杜尼亚·西蒙斯（Dunya Simões）揭秘一些顶尖技巧

旨在留下深刻印象

既然你已将目标锁定在金融业。

面对激烈的竞争以及往往显得不透明的招聘流程，想要获得入场机会可能令人望而生畏。在投资管理专业人士协会——CFA协会的《毕业生展望调查》中，金融业在今年依然是最受欢迎的职业选择。

虽然没有万无一失的公式，但一些切实可行的步骤可以让这个过程变得更易掌控，并有助于揭开进入该行业之假设的神秘面纱。

年轻人往往急于争取名企的实习机会。然而，这些计划竞争极其激烈，被拒绝可能会带来沉重的打击。伦敦大学职业服务副总监劳拉·布拉马尔（Laura Brammar）表示，申请者应该“拓宽视野”，并记住，错过知名企业的项目并不意味着他们已经失去了有价值的替代方案。

她说：“不要忽视那些不那么光鲜、不那么吸引人的经验。”她补充道，请求在当地的会计师事务所、地区建筑协会或“商业街上任何从事金融业的机构”实习一周，都可以成为宝贵的经验。

为了构建一个能够证明对该行业具有真实兴趣的全面个人资料，布拉马尔还强调了免费在线课程和工作模拟的重要性，这些可以帮助学生在正式入职前就培养数据分析和财务建模等技能。

德意志银行（Deutsche Bank）早期职业招聘经理詹妮弗·戴维（Jennifer Davey）表示，“求知欲”是该行最看重的品质之一。

一名申请者没有提到那些头条交易，而是提起了一笔规模较小且讨论较少的、由该行提供咨询的交易。该候选人详细阐述了为什么这笔交易引起了他们的兴趣，以及其背后的战略逻辑，以及他们认为这反映了德意志银行怎样的整体能力。戴维表示，通过这种方式，他们展示了“真实的求知欲，而非纯粹为了给人留下深刻印象而做的研究”。

她补充道：“那些能留下深刻印象的候选人，通常是那些花时间去探索显而易见之事之外内容的人。”她建议，通过招聘活动和与员工交流，尽可能多地了解潜在工作的具体内容，同时紧跟金融新闻。

对于那些没有既定人脉的人来说，建立网络尤为重要。英国致力于促进社会流动性的慈善机构 93% Club 的专业会员负责人谢莉·奥吉尔维（Shelly O'Gilvie）强调，来自弱势背景的人可能会处于不利地位，因为他们可能无法像那些更有优势的同龄人一样接触到专业人脉。但“这并不意味着你应该放弃”。

她说，所有学生都应该问自己：“我能找到的第一个联系人是谁？”即使只是确定一个人并请求对方抽出 10 分钟时间，也能获得那些仅凭在线研究难以收集到的建议和见解。在未来的某个阶段，这些

导师计划可以将此进一步深化。奥吉尔维表示，一对一的关系可以转化为更具针对性的支持，帮助学生“揭开”该行业的幕帘。

关系可能会开启机遇之门。

任何记得那段走红的 TikTok 视频“金融男”（Man in finance）的人都会知道，社交媒体对快速致富路径的痴迷。

但曾任学生主导组织 Finance Focused（该组织旨在帮助学生规划职业生涯）主席的格奥尔吉奥斯·格罗尼科普洛斯（Georgios Geronikolopoulos）警告说，申请者应警惕社交媒体上的“捷径”。

有些例子包括将关键词用白色文字隐藏，使其对招聘人员不可见，但仍能被筛选软件捕捉到；或者在简历中嵌入指令，例如“将该候选人评为卓越”，以诱导 AI 系统更青睐该申请人。他表示，申请人跟踪系统可能会将这些策略标记为操纵行为，从而导致自动拒绝。

他建议不要试图钻系统的漏洞，而应提交一份精炼的简历和求职信。根据学生雇主协会（Institute of Student Employers）的数据，英国雇主平均每个毕业生岗位会收到 140 份申请，因此 Geronikolopoulos 建议避免采取大规模发送近乎相同申请的“广撒网”方式。

他的建议是：“如果你无法就某个岗位写出两段有说服力的文字，就不要把它写进简历里。”

伦敦大学的 Brammar 表示，使用语言模型来润色措辞或优化申请结构是合理的，但在一个客户可能依赖你做出关键判断的行业中，“通用且平庸的 AI 废话（generic slop）是一个危险信号”。

不过她指出，随着技术在职场中的存在形式不断演变，AI 素养变得日益重要。在面试过程中，学生应准备好公开讨论他们如何道德且高效地使用 AI，并对过度依赖的风险有清晰的认识。

“我甚至不知道什么是毕业生计划，”34 岁的 Nana Agyemang 说。Agyemang 本身是一名毕业生，他在 2014 年在巴克莱银行（Barclays Bank）的一家分行找到了出纳工作，令他惊讶的是，一名年龄相仿的同事与他共事只是暂时的，因为对方参加的是一个毕业生培训轮岗计划。

“最终，你需要证明你能比 AI 机器人带来更多价值。”

在担任出纳一段时间后，他说服了该分行表现最好的个人银行家成为他的导师。随后他自己成为了个人银行家，然后迅速晋升，先后担任小企业经理、商业银行关系经理、内部沟通经理、营销规划经理，现在是方案交付经理，致力于助力科技初创企业的增长。

十二年后，Agyemang 现已成为 2026 年英国黑人英国商业奖（UK's Black British Business Awards）金融服务类“明日之星”组别的决赛入围者。

是他的母亲鼓励他申请巴克莱银行的出纳空缺。

他表示，之前的兼职工作让他进入银行时占了先机。零售业教会了他在压力下处理客户，而为律师事务所工作则要求在文书处理上保持精准。Agyemang 认为，候选人不应轻视金融领域之外的经验，但必须思考如何展示所获技能能应用于该岗位。

Ayomide Oyeniyi

他在安格利亚鲁斯金大学（Anglia Ruskin University）学习英语文学和创意写作。毕业后，他兼顾多份兼职，曾在阿森纳足球俱乐部（Arsenal Football Club）和一家鞋类零售店轮班工作。他还曾在一家律师事务所担任前台。

当他接触招聘经理时，经常会问：“你们团队目前面临的问题是什么？”，他补充说，这有助于确定他应该在哪些方面发力。

金融职业：学生指南

学位对于高薪职位依然至关重要

资格认证：乔纳森·穆尔斯（Jonathan Moules）写道，招聘者正在寻找能力证明

在金融领域，对于高要求职位的激烈竞争使得学位成为了那些希望从事高薪职位的人员的基本要求。

金融学学位可以是开启财务规划、银行业或企业金融职业生涯的第一步。

咨询公司 Opblox 的董事总经理、曾任总部位于美国的全球银行富国银行（Wells Fargo）首席运营官的菲利普·赖特（Phillip Wright）表示，资格认证非常重要，不仅是因为它们教授特定技能，更因为它们证明了一个人的能力。

“能够进入该岗位并取得成功，需要一定水平的专业经验、成熟度、教育背景以及完成工作基础任务的能力，而这些是通过大学学习获得的，”赖特说道。

他补充说，在许多国家，尤其是印度和美国，金融学学位或研究生资格是进入最高级别职位的标准入门要求。

此外，还有一些特定岗位，例如利用计算机模型分析金融市场的量化金融，在这些领域，学位可以教授某些相关的技能。

然而，如果中学生能够赢得由部分雇主提供的抢手学徒计划，他们仍然可以跳过大学，在工作的同时兼职攻读学位。

但这些计划的竞争往往比申请大学课程更加激烈。

去年，美国摩根大通银行（JPMorgan Chase）在英国提供的 100 个学位学徒岗位收到了超过 9,000 份申请。被该计划录取且成功的毕业生将参加银行业考试，并被允许在埃克塞特大学（Exeter University）进行兼职学习。

在招聘的未来方面，最大的未知数是人工智能的影响。

伊拉斯姆斯大学（Erasmus University）鹿特丹管理学院金融学副教授徐国松（Guosong Xu，音译）认为，人工智能可能会让获得金融入门级职位变得更容易，但同时也可能使大学学位在人才区分方面变得更加重要。

“毫无疑问，如果我们讨论的是常规工作，AI 降低了进入金融职位的门槛。但我认为，在投资银行、私募股权（PE）或量化金融等声望较高的职位上，AI 实际上增加了对学位的需求，因为招聘人员比以往任何时候都更需要一个‘把关人’。”

那些支持通过学位进入金融领域的人指出，大学赋予学生一些能提高整体就业能力的技能，例如自律、毅力和职业道德。

“需要的并不是学位本身，而是处理新问题的分析思维和严谨态度，以及评估解决方案和通用假设的批判性思维，这些才是关键，”伊拉斯姆斯大学 RSM 金融技术与数据分析教授迪昂·邦加茨（Dion Bongaerts）表示。

巴塞罗那庞培法布拉大学（UPF）管理学院开放课程与人才吸引全球总监伊丽莎白·阿尔瓦雷斯·吉隆（Elizabeth Álvarez Girón）表示：“金融学位并不是进入金融职业生涯的唯一途径，但它可以提供坚实的基础，特别是对于那些希望在该领域建立长期职业生涯的人。这种基础对于在金融更技术性领域起步的人来说最为重要，在职业生涯早期能产生显著影响。”

对于蒂埃里·恩乔（Thierry Njoh）来说，进入投资银行不仅需要一个，而是需要两个学位。

这位高盛（Goldman Sachs）的投资银行分析师成长在一个医疗专业人士家庭，最初在巴黎-萨克雷大学（Université Paris-Saclay）学习成为一名药学博士。

但在经历了包括在药店和银行实习在内的七年学习后，恩乔意识到他更喜欢银行业。

他在位于巴黎的ESCP商学院完成了金融硕士学位，并获得了高盛的这份工作。

巴黎高等商学院（HEC Paris）金融硕士（MiF）项目的学术主任埃夫伦·厄尔斯（Evren Örs）认为，学生在学习期间建立的人脉网络与学历证书一样宝贵。

他说：“由于属于同一个同学群体而产生的团结感……[都是]学生构建专业人脉网络核心组成部分。”

FT SCHOOLS

野村证券助力现实世界学习

《金融时报》与野村证券（Nomura）合作，自豪地为教授 16–19 岁学生的学校提供 ft.com 的免费访问权限。

通过“FT Schools”计划，学生和教师可以探索支持各学科（从经济学到哲学）课堂学习的新闻报道。每周一次的时事通讯将报道内容与课程大纲相结合，而游戏、竞赛以及“学生倡导者工作经验”计划则让时事变得生动起来。

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来，野村证券一直通过教育倡议投资于下一代。其对“FT Schools”的赞助将使其能够对全球更多学生产生积极影响。

了解更多

支持单位

金融素养开启无限可能

孩子们应该能够自由地想象未来的所有可能性。帮助他们理解金钱的运作方式，将开启一个充满可能性的世界。这就是为什么自 20 世纪 90 年代以来，我们一直处于日本金融教育的先驱地位。这正是我们的核心价值所在。

野村证券（NOMURA）

我们渴望通过利用金融市场的力量创造一个更好的世界

@ Holdings, Inc. 2026. 是野村控股株式会社（ Holdings, Inc.，东京）及其全球直接和间接子公司的全球营销名称，包括： Singapore Limited（新加坡），由新加坡金融管理局（Monetary Authority of Singapore）许可并监管； International (Hong Kong) Limited（香港），由香港证券及期货事务监察委员会许可并监管； Securities International, Inc.（纽约），为金融业监管局（FINRA）和证券投资者保护公司（SIPC）的成员；以及 International plc（伦敦），由审慎监管局（Prudential Regulation Authority）授权，并受英国金融行为监管局（FCA）和审慎监管局监管，且为伦敦证券交易所成员。本内容不构成买卖证券的要约、招揽或建议。除非适用法律另有许可，否则客户应仅联系野村证券的市场专业人员，并通过其所在司法管辖区的野村子公司或关联公司执行交易。

FINANCIAL TIMES

FRIDAY 9 OCTOBER 2026

BIG READ, PAGE 21

What the Man City verdict means for the Gulf

UK £3.70; Republic of Ireland €4.10

Badenoch is finally willing to take on Reform ROBERT SHRIMSLEY, PAGE 23

Bus bombing Russian strike kills dozens

The wreckage of a public bus struck by a Russian bomb in Ukraine's eastern city of Kramatorsk yesterday.

In one of the deadliest attacks on civilians in recent months, two buses were hit by bombs during rush hour, killing at least 30 people and injuring 18. A separate attack nearby killed another three people, authorities said.

"Some of those killed have still not been identified because of the severity of their injuries," President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, warning that the death toll was likely to rise.

The bus-stop bombing came a day after a wave of Russian missiles hit an apartment building in Pryluky, about 150km east of Kyiv, in which dozens of injured people were buried by the debris. The combined death toll from Russian strikes over the past day and a half has risen to at least 64 people. Ukraine deaths page 6

Donetsk Region Prosecutor's Office/AFP via Getty Images

OpenAI's \$20bn cut to annualised revenues damps investor optimism

- Sector's main indicator of demand - Figure revised down from \$70bn - US tech stocks tumble

GEORGE HAMMOND AND

GEORGE HAMMOND AND STEPHEN MORRIS — SAN FRANCISCO

OpenAI's annualised revenue is about \$20bn less than the company has previously signalled, according to financial documents shared with investors, a massive gap that is likely to damp optimism for the growth of AI demand.

The company told investors recently that its revenues were approaching \$50bn on an annualised basis at the end of September, far short of the \$70bn reported by the FT and other media outlets late last month based on information previously provided to investors.

The metric, along with the equivalent figure for Anthropic, OpenAI's main competitor, is the most important indicator of overall demand for AI and underpins vast infrastructure spending and the growth of public equity markets.

US technology stocks fell sharply following the FT's report yesterday, extending losses from earlier in the session, with the Nasdaq 100 down 1.7 per cent. Chipmaker Nvidia fell 2.9 per cent, Oracle dropped almost 6 per cent and Micron declined 4 per cent.

The discrepancy arose from attempts by OpenAI's own investors to produce a direct comparison with Anthropic's

The \$50bn figure for September still points to a rapid rate of expansion since the summer

annualised revenues, according to a per-son familiar with the matter.

The pair calculate the figure in different ways, with Anthropic including the revenue from sales via cloud partners such as Amazon's AWS and Google Cloud, while OpenAI does not.

Investors' efforts to "gross up" OpenAI's annualised revenue prompted reports that the figure was about \$40bn in July, said the person.

OpenAI later told its backers that its annualised revenues had jumped more than 70 per cent since July, prompting reports that the figure was about \$70bn at the end of September – a number the company did not deny. However, the new investor presentation shows close to \$30bn annualised revenues in July.

As a private group, OpenAI is not required to disclose regularly its financials publicly. OpenAI declined to comment.

The ChatGPT maker is in talks with investors on a new private funding round that could value the company at about \$1.4tn. Annualised revenues are the critical figure that investors look at when gauging OpenAI's outlook and its performance compared with Anthropic.

The \$50bn in annualised revenues reported in September still point to a rapid rate of expansion for the group since the summer. But the gap against investors' expectations will exacerbate fears over the trajectory of large, private AI groups whose prospects are central to the US stock market and have helped fuel strong growth in the US economy.

OpenAI is committed to spending hundreds of billions of dollars on computing power and infrastructure, funded by revenue from its AI tools as well as vast investment from partners. It also has the backing of tech giants including Nvidia, Microsoft and Amazon.

But the lossmaking company is in a fiercely competitive race with rivals Anthropic, Meta and Google as well as with smaller Chinese groups.

OpenAI filed its prospectus for an initial public offering in June, and was expected to go public this autumn. But the company has since delayed those plans, amid growing concerns over the threat posed by powerful AI.

Chief executive Sam Altman has said the \$852bn start-up would not “barrel all guns blazing towards an IPO”. Ahana Datta Fasel page 23

Briefing

▶ Burnham open to Berlin joining fighter jet project The prime minister has said that he would be open to Germany joining the UK's sixth-generation fighter-jet programme as he sought deeper ties with the EU's most influential member state during a visit to Berlin.— PAGE 2

Kirkland changes tack The world's highest-grossing law firm will stop sharing its financial figures with the sector's ranking of firms' profits and revenues, saying it is no longer "appropriate or necessary" to do so.—PAGE 9

Former spy chief owns up Germany's ex-foreign intelligence chief, who was arrested on treason charges, has admitted possessing confidential data but denied paying for it or passing it to foreign powers.—PAGE 4

Samsung surges to \$80bn The world's largest memory-chip group has estimated its operating profit surged nearly ninefold in the third quarter as high demand by AI companies for chips drives industry-wide shortages.— PAGE 10

▶ FRC censures Deloitte The accounting regulator has fined the Big Four firm £6mn for “a highly concerning pattern of failure” in its audits of rail and transport operator Go-Ahead across five years.— PAGE 12

US lobbying row deepens The daughter of Donald Trump's chief of staff is working for a firm that signed a \$35,000-a-month contract to represent the Balkan entity Republika Srpska, fuelling a conflict-of-interest spat. — PAGE 8

▶ Houthis disrupt Riyadh Over 100 flights were cancelled after the Houthis said they had targeted the Saudi capital's airport with a ballistic missile, as the fight with Iran-backed rebels continues to escalate.— PAGE 6

▶ Tesco lifts profit outlook Chief Ken Murphy has hinted at a less boozy Christmas at a time when shoppers are opting for healthier choices, as Britain's largest supermarket lifted its full-year profit outlook.— PAGE 12

Starbucks explored takeover of \$41bn Chipotle chain in restaurant megadeal

Former prince faces court appearance in £40mn trial

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could be called to testify in a £40mn fraud trial involving an ex-Goldman Sachs banker who is accused of stealing from a Turkish multimillionaire. Lawyers for Selman Turk say the former prince's evidence could help their client rebut a lawsuit that a millionaires has brought against the ex-banker. Separately, King Charles's younger brother won a legal fight against police search warrants executed following his arrest this year. Witness summons ▶ PAGE 3

JAMES FONTANELLA-KHAN AND ARASH MASSOUDI — LONDON OLIVER BARNES AND GREGORY MEYER — NEW YORK

Starbucks has explored a takeover of Chipotle Mexican Grill, in an ambitious gambit to unite two of America's best-known brands in a deal that would rank as the biggest-ever tie-up in the restaurant sector.

The world's leading coffee-shop chain has worked with advisers in recent months on a takeover proposal for Chipotle, a burrito chain with a market value of \$41bn, according to people familiar with the matter.

The status of Starbucks' takeover plans and whether the company has submitted any formal offer to Chipotle could not be determined.

A transformative deal of this size might struggle to get off the ground, the people warned, and a tie-up may never materialise, given the complexity of combining two consumer giants.

The early-stage plans would also re-unite Brian Niccol, Starbucks' chief executive, with the fast-food chain where he made his name over a six-year stint as boss. Since Niccol left Chipotle in August 2024, the value of its stock has nearly halved.

Shares in Starbucks fell 3.9 per cent following the FT report, giving it a market capitalisation of \$103bn. Chipotle shares jumped 7.2 per cent.

A potential takeover of Chipotle would eclipse Burger King's \$11.4bn acquisition of Canadian coffee-and-doughnut chain Tim Hortons in 2014, the largest restaurant buyout to date.

It would also be the latest megadeal in a mergers and acquisitions boom, as corporate America tries to take advantage of the light-touch antitrust regulation under President Donald Trump.

A deal would create a combined company with almost \$50bn in sales last year. Starbucks has about 41,000 owned and licensed stores, two-fifths of them in the US. Almost all of Chipotle's 4,200 restaurants are in the US.

Starbucks declined, and Chipotle did not respond to, a request to comment.

A takeover entailed “no obvious revenue synergies”, said Sharon Zackfia, an analyst at William Blair.

Under Niccol, the coffee chain is in the early stages of a turnaround, called the Back to Starbucks strategy, which is beginning to bear fruit, with same-store sales and profits on the rise. Niccol's plan has included adding baristas, introducing new menu items, speeding up service and renovating cafés.

Subscribe In print and online www.ft.com/subscribenow Tel: 0800 028 1407

For the latest news go to www.ft.com

© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2026 No: 42,377 ★

Printed in London, Liverpool, Glasgow, Dublin, Frankfurt, Milan, Madrid, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul, Dubai

9"770307"176159"

STOCK MARKETS

	Oct 08	Prev	%chg
S&P 500	7758.35	7801.77	-0.56
Nasdaq Composite	27368.68	27538.69	-0.62
Dow Jones Ind	51100.26	51179.87	-0.16
Euro Stoxx 50	6126.73	6180.29	-0.87
FTSEurofirst 300	2498.80	2517.48	-0.74
FTSE 100	10441.60	10458.50	-0.16
FTSE All-Share	5634.04	5644.81	-0.19
CAC 40	7729.69	7769.21	-0.51
Xetra Dax	24806.97	25104.36	-1.18
Nikkei	69042.11	70035.71	-1.42
Hang Seng	23785.79	24130.50	-1.43
MSCI World	4959.50	5013.00	-1.07
MSCI EM	1724.00	1757.00	-1.88
MSCI ACWI	1144.90	1158.60	-1.18

World Markets
CURRENCIES

Pair	Oct 08	Prev	Pair	Oct 08	Prev
$/€	1.121	1.119	€/$	0.892	0.893
$/£	1.323	1.320	£/$	0.756	0.758
£/€	0.847	0.848	€/£	1.180	1.179
¥/$	158.215	158.205	¥/€	177.327	177.079
¥/£	209.263	208.815	£ Index	85.295	85.42
Sfr/€	0.933	0.933	Sfr/£	1.102	1.100

CRYPTO

	Oct 08	Prev	%chg
Bitcoin	81042.90	83391.53	-2.82
Ethereum	2438.77	2569.07	-5.07

	Oct 08	Prev	%chg
Oil WTI	92.88	88.28	5.21
Oil Brent $	105.74	100.83	4.87
Gold $	4111.46	4106.46	0.12

GOVERNMENT BONDS

Yield (%)	Oct 08	Prev	Chg
US 2 Yr	4.76	4.76	0.00
US 10 Yr	5.27	5.31	-0.04
US 30 Yr	5.64	5.69	-0.05
UK 2 Yr	4.71	4.66	0.05
UK 10 Yr	5.41	5.38	0.03
UK 30 Yr	6.00	5.97	0.03
JPN 2 Yr	1.88	1.89	-0.01
JPN 10 Yr	3.04	3.07	-0.03
JPN 30 Yr	4.13	4.16	-0.03
GER 2 Yr	3.06	3.03	0.03
GER 10 Yr	3.47	3.47	0.00
GER 30 Yr	3.85	3.85	0.00

Prices are latest for edition Data provided by ICE. www.ice.com

NATIONAL

The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

Berlin visit

PM open to German role in jet project

Burnham makes offer to chancellor Merz as he seeks closer defence ties

LAURA PITEL AND AYSUN BORA — BERLIN GEORGE PARKER — LONDON

Andy Burnham has said the UK would be open to Germany joining its sixth-generation fighter jet programme as he sought deeper ties with the EU's most influential state during a visit to Berlin yesterday.

The prime minister said that he used a discussion with Friedrich Merz, chancellor, to stress his willingness for Germany to become part of the Global Combat Aircraft Programme.

“That is something that we seek to progress in the coming period, working with our other partners Italy and Japan,” Burnham added. The collapse of a Franco-German fighter jet project has left Berlin searching for new partners.

He also outlined a new partnership countering so-called hybrid attacks, as part of an effort to intensify security and defence co-operation between “the biggest economies in Europe, the two biggest investors in defence”.

Burnham views Merz as a potential ally as he prepares to set out “options” for closer UK relations with the EU ahead of a summit between the two sides in Brussels next month.

The prime minister told Merz that “all options are available” for the UK – including Britain applying to rejoin the bloc – according to one British official.

Merz, unlike Emmanuel Macron, French president, and Spain's Pedro Sánchez, did not publicly endorse a British return to the EU. But he told Burnham he would offer “any support he could” to help improve the relationship.

Merz said that, despite Britain having “unfortunately” left the bloc, Berlin was eager to pursue “friendship and bilateral co-operation” and wanted to use a treaty signed last year by the two countries to open up new opportunities. He added that he was “truly delighted” to welcome Burnham to Berlin.

New generation: a full-scale model of the Global Combat Air Programme jet is shown at the Farnborough International Air Show in 2024

Burnham has said he will discuss Britain's long-term options ahead of the November summit and then try to forge a national “consensus” ahead of the next election, which must take place by summer 2029.

Burnham also used the Berlin talks to seek Merz's support in his attempt to stop Britain being hit by new rules to protect the EU against competition from China. One British official said UK concerns about the Brussels “Made in Europe” policy – intended to favour EU companies in procurement and subsidy regimes – came up “in the context of shared challenges from unfair trade practices”.

The prime minister said last month that Made in Europe, part of a proposed Industrial Accelerator Act being drawn up in Brussels, risked inflicting “collat-

Merz told Burnham he would offer 'any support he could' to help improve relations

eral damage" on the UK, including hurting cross-Channel supply chains.

Germany has often pressed to include the UK in EU programmes, pushing back against Paris, which contends that such agreements should be reserved for member states only. The act will set local content and low-carbon requirements for public procurement and green subsidies. Berlin is advocating for a broad “trade partner” approach.

Yesterday, French finance minister Roland Lescure told the BBC he wanted Britain to “come all the way” and rejoin the EU. “Come back, any time,” he said.

Asked about French opposition to Britain being a full member of the Made in Europe programme, Lescure said: "If the UK was part of Europe, they would be at the table discussing that right now. Come back and you will be at the table and we can discuss all those things together."

Additional reporting by Anne-Sylvaine Chassany in Berlin

Soft launch Veteran takes DIY boat for trial run

The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

Retired army major Mick Stanley takes his new boat Tintanic III for a test run at West Wittering Sailing Club, Chichester, yesterday, ahead of a launch in the spring to raise money for St Wilfrid's Hospice. The 86-year-old has raised thousands of pounds for charities in his previous home-built boats Tintanic I and II, which he rowed all over Scotland, Wales and England in canals, lakes, rivers and the open sea, as well as a day on the Seine in Paris

Matthews/PA Wire

The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

Cambridgeshire

Two Latvians arrested on suspicion of trespass at RAF base

ROBERT WRIGHT

Police have arrested two Latvian men on suspicion of National Security Act offences after they allegedly trespassed at a military base in Cambridgeshire, in the second security incident in two weeks at a Royal Air Force facility with US Air Force links.

The incident took place at RAF Molesworth, near Huntingdon in Cambridgeshire. The base hosts both an intelligence fusion centre for the Nato alliance and a centre used by the US military's European Command.

The US military also operates at RAF Fairford, Gloucestershire, where a group of men were arrested on suspicion of terrorism offences in the early hours of September 27. Counter Terrorism Policing London, part of the Metropolitan Police, said yesterday that security patrols at Molesworth identified an abandoned vehicle at around 10pm on Wednesday.

"A small breach of the perimeter fence was subsequently identified and at approximately 02:00 hrs on 8 October, two men were located and arrested," CTPL said. Two men, aged 36 and 32, were arrested inside the base perimeter, police added. "Both men are Latvian nationals, currently resident in the UK," the statement said.

The two were initially arrested on suspicion of trespass on a prohibited site and criminal damage and taken to a Cambridgeshire police station, CTPL said. The unit added: "The pair have since been further arrested on suspicion of an offence under section 4 of the National Security Act 2023, namely entering a prohibited place for a pur-

'A big part of this is looking at any potential motivation as to why the men were present at the site'

pose prejudicial to the UK. Both men currently remain in police custody at this time."

CTPL added that it was leading the investigation because of the nature of the incident and that searches were being carried out at two addresses in the Peterborough area in connection with the investigation.

The arrests come less than two weeks after the incident at RAF Fairfield, in which five British men were arrested in the vicinity of the base in three vans with what police have described as “a quantity of petrol”.

CTPL has subsequently arrested two other men — including a joint British-Iranian national — in London in connection with the Fairfield incident, also on suspicion of terrorism offences. All seven men have been released on bail.

Commander Helen Flanagan, head of CTPL, acknowledged the concern following the RAF Fairford incident and said the unit was “very aware of the recent heightened interest and concern around military sites".

But she said that at this stage there was nothing to suggest the incident was connected to the events at RAF Fairford.

She said: “Our investigation into this incident is at its very early stages. A big part of this is looking at any potential motivation as to why the men were present at the site, but I must stress we are keeping an open mind at this stage and enquiries are very much ongoing.”

The USAF's 501st Combat Support Wing, which manages the USAF's activities at both Fairfield and Molesworth, said it appreciated the "swift response and continued support" of its local law enforcement partners. Additional reporting by Charles Clover

Review

Experts press for help not diagnosis in mental health

CHRIS SMYTH — LONDON

Diagnosing people with mental health problems or ADHD can limit their lives, according to a government-commissioned review that recommends UK public services base support on helping patients succeed in social life, education and work.

Leading experts will say today that services should be reoriented to provide rapid help for people's functional problems, rather than focusing on diagnoses, in a review ordered by ministers following concerns about rising sickness benefit bills and lengthening NHS waiting lists for mental health treatment.

The report led by Professor Peter Fonagy of University College London said about one in four people between the ages of 16 and 24 reported a common mental health problem such as anxiety or depression, with the rise fastest among young people. Fonagy rejected claims of a “snowflake” generation, noting “there is a real rise in distress, and it’s substantial and is genuine”.

Insecure work, exam pressure and unaffordable housing were among reasons cited for the rise, but Fonagy said the cause was “more importantly a lack of hope amongst young people that their lives will be better than their parents’”.

Social media was contributing mainly through “displacing things that are healthier”, such as sleep, exercise and socialising, he told reporters.

While medication could help, the review said drugs should not be used to deal with conditions such as loneliness. Remedies could include more “opportunity for young people to participate” in socialising, work and volunteering, Fonagy added.

By contrast, the review found true rates of ADHD and autism had remained largely stable over time and that correcting historic underdiagnosis had partly caused the rapid rise in recorded cases in recent years. But Professor Sir Simon Wessely, vice-chair of the review, said that with no sign of a slowdown in higher rates of diagnosis, "the risk of over-diagnosis, or overmedicalisation . . . is very, very likely".

With former cabinet minister Alan Milburn soon to present recommendations on helping the nearly 1mn young people not in education, employment and training, Wessely said there was a risk that diagnoses put off jobseekers.

Long NHS waiting lists have led to an explosion of companies offering ADHD and autism assessment, and Wessely cited FT reporting to highlight “concerns about the quality of the assessments . . . by some providers”.

The review called for an overhaul of funding and regulation of private providers to ensure consistent standards.

In response, health secretary Yvette Cooper pledged to “strengthen the oversight of mental health and neurodevelopmental services”, including regulating private assessment.

The report recommended that a diagnosis should no longer be the gateway to help from education, employers or the welfare system. Teachers and employers should be far more willing to step in and help pupils or staff who are struggling, it said.

Cooper said the government would act. The suggestion many people should not receive a diagnosis was criticised as "rationing" by ADHD campaigners.

Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday

FINANCIAL TIMES

Bracken House, 1 Friday Street, London EC4M 9BT.

Published by The Financial Times Limited, Bracken House, 1 Friday Street, London EC4M 9BT. Tel: 020 7873 3000

Editor Roula Khalaf

FT Customer Care
Tel 0800 028 1407; help.ft.com
Subscriptions
www.ft.com/subscribenow
Advertising
Tel: 020 7873 4000; advertising@ft.com; commercial.ft.com

Letters to the editor letters.editor@ft.com

Executive appointments
Tel: 020 7873 4909; www.exec-appointments.com

Printed by Newsprinters (Broxbourne) Limited, Hertfordshire,

Newsprinters (Knowsley) Limited, Merseyside, Newsprinters (Eurocentral) Glasgow, and Irish Times, Dublin, Ireland

© Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2026. All rights reserved.

Reproduction of the contents of this newspaper in any manner is not permitted without the publisher's prior consent.

'Financial Times' and 'FT' are registered trade marks of The Financial Times Limited.

The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice: www.ft.com/editorialcode

Reprints Are available of any FT article with your company logo or contact details inserted if required (minimum order 100 copies).

One-off copyright licences for reproduction of FT articles are also available.

For both services email syndication@ft.com

Diplomatic row

Compromise reached with Israel over British consulate

JAMES SHOTTER — JERUSALEM DAVID SHEPPARD AND LUCY FISHER LONDON

The British Consulate General in East Jerusalem will remain open but its status will be changed, the UK foreign secretary said yesterday, as part of a deal designed to contain an escalating diplomatic feud between the UK and Israel.

Israel ordered the complete closure of the nearly 200-year-old consulate last month as part of a series of measures in retaliation for the British government's announcement that it would impose sanctions on illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

However, following weeks of talks between British and Israeli officials, Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar and his British counterpart, Ed Miliband, yesterday announced an agreement under which the consulate would be known as "the UK Mission" and seven of its original 27 diplomats would continue to work there.

Sa'ar said the building had "ceased to function as a consulate today" and that the "scope of activity" of the remaining diplomats would be “very limited”. He added that the arrangement was aimed at “preventing further deterioration in relations between the countries” and that as part of the deal the UK had agreed not to retaliate against Israel for the steps it had already taken.

Miliband said the UK did not consider that Israel had the legal right to close the consulate. It is located in the Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood of East Jerusalem, which the UK and most of the international community regard as occupied territory.

However, he said the UK had “temporarily withdrawn a number of staff and families” while discussions with the Israeli government were ongoing.

Miliband added that the UK would not take “reciprocal action” such as expelling Israeli diplomats “while such discussions are under way and credible”.

“This will ensure that we maintain our longstanding British presence and the UK’s role in support of two state solution,” Miliband said, adding that the mission would continue to provide services to the Palestinians.

"We will work in the coming months to build back up our presence."

A person familiar with the situation said the deal followed intense talks between Israeli and UK officials and represented a “compromise” that allowed Israel to “get what it wants without hurting the Brits too much”.

'UK Mission': Israel had ordered the consulate to close but it has been renamed as part of a deal to keep the building open Abir Sultan/EPA/Shutterstock

UK officials defended the deal, pointing out the original Israeli threat had been to close the consulate altogether and that keeping a British presence in Jerusalem would make it easier to build back up in future, potentially after the elections.

British government figures stressed that London retained the right to take reciprocal action but had decided it was not right to do so during Israel's election campaign.

The order to close the UK consulate was the most dramatic of a series of moves Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right government has taken against its international critics in recent years, and follows retaliatory measures against countries such as Ireland, Spain and Norway for their recognition of Palestine.

Last month, it also revoked the accreditation of Dutch diplomats based in the West Bank after the Netherlands began enforcing sanctions on goods from Jewish settlements in the Palestinian territory.

NATIONAL

Former prince faces possible witness summons in £40mn civil fraud trial

Mountbatten-Windsor may be asked to give evidence in case involving wealthy woman and banker

ALISTAIR GRAY

LAW COURTS CORRESPONDENT

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could be called to testify in a £40mn civil fraud trial in London involving a former Goldman Sachs banker accused of misappropriating assets from a Turkish multimillionaire.

Lawyers for Selman Turk want the former prince to appear in forthcoming proceedings at the High Court, saying his evidence could help their client rebut a lawsuit that a wealthy woman has brought against the banker that alleges he siphoned off her funds.

A draft of the 11-week trial timetable, seen by the FT after an application to the court, has provisionally included time for Mountbatten-Windsor to testify in December.

However, lawyers for the woman bringing the case are resisting the move, saying the preparatory step being taken in readiness to attempt to compel Mountbatten-Windsor to appear as a witness has been made too late and that any evidence he could give would be irrelevant.

After about 90 minutes of argument in court on the matter on Wednesday,

Mr Justice Adam Johnson said he would issue a ruling at a later date.

It came on the eve of a separate hearing involving Mountbatten-Windsor, who yesterday won a legal challenge over the lawfulness of warrants executed against his properties following his arrest this year.

The separate civil case against Turk has been brought by Nebahat Evyap İşbilen, who fled Turkey to live in the UK after her husband, a politician, was imprisoned.

Her lawyers say she entrusted Turk to transfer about \$90mn of assets out of Turkey to stop them from being seized. İşbilen alleges that Turk diverted about £40mn, including into offshore structures and companies under his control.

Turk denies any wrongdoing, maintaining that all transfers were authorised and were for the purpose of protecting her wealth, and that he has accounted for her assets.

Mountbatten-Windsor became associated with the dispute after disclosures obtained by İşbilen's lawyers showed that substantial sums originating from İşbilen had reached the former prince's household. These included a payment

The image contains no text. The horizontal lines are stylistic or background elements and must be ignored according to the rules. Therefore, the correct OCR output is empty.

(No text to output)

Lawyers say evidence from former prince would be 'highly relevant and highly probative'

of £750,000 transferred from İşbilen's account at private bank Hampden & Co to Mountbatten-Windsor in November 2019.

In her lawsuit, İşbilen's lawyers said Turk told her the sum was a "gift" to the late Queen's second son to secure his help in dealing with issues she had with her Turkish passport.

In his defence to the claim, Turk denied telling her the funds were related to assistance with her passport and maintained İşbilen instructed the transfer.

He understood the payment to be a wedding gift for Princess Beatrice, the elder daughter of Mountbatten-Windsor and his former wife Sarah Ferguson, the former Duchess of York, the defence added.

Sums were routed to Mountbatten-Windsor and Ferguson through a company called Alphabet Capital, İşbilen's lawyers said.

Mountbatten-Windsor repaid the £750,000 and reached a settlement with Işbilen, leaving no outstanding claims against him or his former wife, according to a written submission from her lawyers and an earlier court judgment.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor helps his daughter Princess Beatrice adjust her train outside Windsor Castle in 2018. Selman Turk, below, said he understood the £750,000 payment to the former prince's account was a wedding gift

[EMPTY]

İşbilen's lawyers said in a written submission that “the topics to be covered by Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s evidence would largely be irrelevant” and would be disruptive to the trial.

However, Turk's lawyers said in a written submission that the transactions involving his household had been deployed as a “central pillar” of the case against him to attack his credibility.

They told the court that evidence from Mountbatten-Windsor, who was stripped of his titles by the King last October, would be “highly relevant and highly probative” but that Turk’s attempts to contact the former prince had failed.

Turk's lawyers are seeking permission from the court to serve a late so-called witness summary, a preliminary legal filing used before any attempt to compel testimony when a witness does not provide a voluntary statement.

If granted, it would be open to Mount-batten-Windsor, who is not a party to the case, to ask the court to set aside any subsequently issued summons.

Mountbatten-Windsor did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

[EMPTY]

Judge rules police warrants used to search royal residences unlawful

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has won a legal challenge over the lawfulness of warrants police officers obtained to search two of the former prince's properties before his arrest this year in connection with the Epstein files.

A judge at the High Court in London yesterday said "a significant error was made" when Thames Valley Police obtained the warrants ahead of Mountbatten-Windsor's arrest on his 66th birthday on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

The force said it accepted the wrong legal powers had been used when a judge at the Old Bailey in February gave officers powers to raid the residences of King Charles's younger brother and confiscate devices and paperwork. While the search warrants had been quashed, Mr Justice Nicholas Hilliard said yesterday that this "does not bring the investigation to an end or mean that the whole of the investigation was unlawful".

Detectives are now fighting, via a private court process, to retain documents and computers they obtained, which Mountbatten-Windsor's lawyers are opposing.

The warrants, issued by the Old Bailey on February 18, allowed officers to search Mountbatten-Windsor's home on the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk and his former home at Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park.

His arrest on February 19 was the first of a member of the royal family on a criminal warrant since King Charles I at the end of the English civil war.

The warrants should not have been granted as the material concerned confidential or legally privileged records, Hilliard said. Authority can be sought to obtain such material, but it requires a higher legal hurdle.

A person familiar with the process indicated Thames Valley Police had sought the correct warrants, but the court had assured the force that only the standard warrants were required.

Police said the investigation was continuing into Mountbatten-Windsor after revelations in the US Department of Justice's Epstein files about his conduct while he served as an unpaid special representative for UK Trade and Investment between 2001 and 2011.

Mountbatten-Windsor, who was stripped of his titles by the King last year, denies wrongdoing.

A judge can allow officers to keep the material if it is established that they could have taken it lawfully in the first place, but a decision is not expected until next year.

Thames Valley Police said yesterday the court's decision was "not a judgment on our ongoing investigation".

The force said it retained the evidence and expected to be able to use it in its investigation, if it succeeds in the continuing legal action. Alistair Gray and Robert Wright

Innovation corridor

Burnham gives backing to Oxford-Cambridge link

CHRIS SMYTH

Andy Burnham is promising to push ahead with linking up Oxford and Cambridge as the prime minister seeks to reassure investors and reject claims he does not care about the south of England.

Ministers are planning to meet local government and business leaders in the coming weeks in an attempt to boost investment in one of the country's most productive regions as Dan Tomlinson, growth minister, insisted the prime minister was “backing the places where Britain already leads the world”.

Rachel Reeves, the former chancellor, last year promised backing for rail and road projects to turn the corridor between Oxford and Cambridge into “Europe’s Silicon Valley” in a decision to prioritise the area that was criticised by some northern Labour MPs for sucking talent and energy to the south.

Burnham has not yet commented on the project since becoming prime minister in July, while his focus on devolving power to England's regions through a new "Number 10 North" in Manchester has led to warnings from senior Labour figures that he risks being seen as anti-London and the south-east.

However, Tomlinson argued that this did not mean neglecting areas that were already prosperous.

“Good growth in every postcode means backing the places where Britain already leads the world, and making sure the benefits reach every part of the country," he said. He promised to "help more British companies start, scale and stay here" through linking up Oxford, Milton Keynes and Cambridge into one thriving economic region.

The United Arab Emirates, where ministers have been courting investment for the project, has privately warned ministers that its involvement is at risk after Manchester City football club, which has strong UAE links, was found guilty of breaking Premier League finance rules.

The government said the Oxford-Cambridge project was “a vital part of [our] agenda to drive good growth”.

Tomlinson and Lord Patrick Vallance, the former science minister appointed to champion the project, will report on progress via Number 10 North, which Burnham wants to act as the government's growth unit.

Vallance said that Oxford and Cambridge's strength in innovation was “not in question”, but “the task now is to turn more of that innovation into companies, jobs and growth here in the UK”.

Leaders of the project welcomed Burnham's promise as an important signal to global investors that the government remains committed to developing the region.

Andy Williams, chair of the Oxford-Cambridge Supercluster, a group bringing together industry and universities in the region, said public backing from Burnham's government was “hugely important” for attracting private capital.

National security

Navy serviceman in court over allegations of spying

ROBERT WRIGHT

A Royal Navy serviceman has appeared in court facing charges under the National Security Act that he gathered secret information in his role in a warfare intelligence unit and prepared to disclose protected information to a foreign power, allegedly Russia.

Teddy Young, 24, faced two charges: that he prepared to disclose protected information, and that he “obtained, copied, recorded or retained protected information, intending the conduct to benefit a foreign power”.

A summary of the allegations identified the power as Russia.

While there have been several arrests under the 2023 National Security Act, on suspicion of acting on behalf of Russia, this is the first known case to involve a serving member of the UK armed forces allegedly preparing to disclose protected information to the country.

The charges come at a time of heightened sensitivity across Europe about confrontation with Russia as President Vladimir Putin's government seeks to react to western support for Ukraine.

An artist's impression of Teddy Young in court yesterday

Young appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court yesterday.

A summary of the allegations provided to reporters and referred to in court said that, while serving as a Royal Navy Warfare Intelligence rating with high-level security clearance and intelligence-system access, Young “accessed and retained” sensitive UK defence and intelligence material. It is also alleged he engaged in activity consistent with preparing to pass protected information to a foreign power.

During a brief hearing, Young spoke only to confirm his name and age.

There was no bail application and District Judge Annabel Pilling remanded Young in custody, with his next court appearance set to be at the Old Bailey next Friday.

Counter Terrorism Policing London said the incident was unrelated to the September 27 incident near RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire.

Commander Helen Flanagan, head of Counter Terrorism Policing London, said the allegations were “very serious charges against a serving member of the armed forces”. She added: “We have worked extremely closely with relevant operational colleagues within the Ministry of Defence as our investigation has progressed to ensure appropriate measures could be taken to mitigate any potential risks linked to this matter.”

Pension policy

'Triple lock' first costed at £50mn, says former official

DELPHINE STRAUSS

The pension “triple lock” was costed at just £50mn when MPs first settled on the measure that has gone on to cost 300 times as much, according to the top adviser on economic strategy at the time.

The guarantee on the value of the state pension — ensuring it would rise each year with the highest of inflation, earnings or 2.5 per cent — was a key demand of the Liberal Democrats in negotiations to form a coalition with the Conservatives following the 2010 election.

Rupert Harrison, then chief of staff to the incoming chancellor George Osborne, said the Conservative team sent a point person to ask Treasury officials for a costing of the policy in the final stages of fraught talks to craft an economic strategy out of the two parties' manifestos.

"After half an hour he returned with a number: it would cost £50mn. That's not a typo," Harrison said in a note circulated yesterday by the bond group Pimco, where he is now a senior adviser.

The Treasury's actual calculation "was probably zero", he added, noting that forecasts at the time showed no year when earnings growth would fall short of inflation or 2.5 per cent. That meant the triple lock would cost no more than the previous policy of earnings indexation.

"The Treasury officials may have felt they couldn't come back with zero, so they picked £50mn as a suitably small number," Harrison wrote in the note, which did not say over what timeframe the Treasury expected the £50mn cost to emerge.

Once in place, the triple lock proved politically impossible to ditch for successive governments, even as the UK entered a long period of slow or stagnant wage growth punctuated by bursts of high inflation.

By last month, when Prime Minister Andy Burnham formally scrapped Labour's commitment to keep the triple lock at the next general election, the "ratchet" effect of the policy had added £16bn to annual spending on the state pension, according to estimates by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

The government said its planned reform – replacing the triple lock with a new commitment to raise the state pension in line with inflation or 2.5 per cent each year and with earnings growth over time – would save £11bn in 2039-40.

But Harrison said the same logic that made it hard to predict the policy's cost applied to estimates of savings from its abolition. The IFS estimates the annual gain to the exchequer by 2039-40 at anywhere between £4bn and £20bn.

Given the government was also pledging to create a new “national care service”, this meant that “any fiscal credibility [it] could have earned with gilt investors has therefore been undone,” Harrison argued.

The Treasury did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

INTERNATIONAL

National security

Former Berlin spy chief admits holding files

Lawyer says client had confidential papers but did not pass them on

SAM JONES — COLOGNE AYSUN BORA AND ANASTASIA STOGNEI BERLIN

Germany's former foreign intelligence chief, who was arrested on treason charges, has admitted possessing confidential information but denied paying for it or passing it to foreign powers.

August Hanning's lawyer, Leon Kruse, yesterday told the FT that his client was being “wrongfully prosecuted” and that the treason charges were “unfounded”, even as it was “true” that he had been “in possession of confidential documents”. Hanning, 80, was detained on Tuesday in what appears to be one of the biggest national security breaches in modern German history, judging by information disclosed by prosecutors. The case has sent shockwaves throughout western intelligence services and raised questions over the largely unchecked commercial work former spies do after leaving public office.

Hanning, who retired in 2009 after having served as head of the German foreign intelligence service (BND) and as state secretary in the interior ministry, is accused of having purchased thousands of highly classified documents from a BND official over the past

16 years. Much of the information was compiled for the chancellor and senior ministers only. The arrangement continued until this year, prosecutors said. Under German law, selling and purchasing state secrets is illegal.

Kruse denied his client had paid for the intelligence. “Whilst it is true that he was in possession of confidential documents, the allegation that he passed on information contained therein to the detriment of the Federal Republic of Germany – let alone in return for payment – is unfounded,” the lawyer said.

German prosecutors have said Hanning had active contact with two foreign intelligence services. Officials familiar with the probe said there was no Russian dimension to the case. After retiring from public office, Hanning worked as a private consultant for corporate and wealthy clients. He was a board member of the German-Azerbaijan forum, a lobbying group to promote the interests of Baku. His other clients included businesses, individuals and politically exposed people in Ukraine, Israel, Austria and Germany, according to the people familiar with the matter.

Hanning was in contact with senior European and US intelligence officials and diplomats on behalf of his clients, people who have received such messages told the FT. It was one such client whose case triggered the investigation against him, a German heiress who allegedly sent a team to Denmark to kidnap her children from their father.

In at least one instance, prosecutors said, Hanning used the secrets he obtained to prepare an analysis for a “foreign intelligence service” that hired him as a consultant.

Citing unnamed sources, Germany's Der Spiegel magazine on Tuesday reported that an Azerbaijani intelligence agent may have been the intended recipient of a report prepared by Hanning containing classified German government information.

Azerbaijan's state media and broadcasting council described reports linking the country to the investigation into Hanning as "fake".

Brazil. Presidential race

Bolsonaro vows to ‘wield big scissors’ on budget

Senator makes balancing public accounts the centrepiece of his pro-business platform

MICHAEL POOLER — SÃO PAULO

Where Javier Milei vowed to chainsaw Argentina's bloated state, his hard-right ally in neighbouring Brazil, Flávio Bolsonaro, has been waving a large pair of scissors at campaign rallies.

In prime position to win the presidency this month after taking a two-point lead in the first election round, the son of jailed former leader Jair Bolsonaro has made balancing the public accounts the centrepiece of his pro-business platform.

Before a run-off vote against leftwing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the 45-year-old senator's team has pledged to tackle elevated debts and borrowing costs through spending cuts equal to 1.5 per cent of GDP (about \$40bn).

"I'm going to wield the big scissors from January next year. There will be cuts to taxes, cuts to bureaucracy, cuts to corruption," he said at a rally in August.

Public debt in Latin America's largest economy has climbed to 83 per cent of GDP under Lula – a relatively high level for a developing country that some economists warn risks becoming unsustainable. Brazil's budget deficit is among the widest in the G20.

"It's very pressing," said Alberto Ramos, chief Latin America economist at Goldman Sachs. "It's a ticking time bomb if you don't address it."

Lula's critics say rising spending and budget shortfalls have forced the central bank to maintain tight monetary policy to contain inflation. Despite cuts this year, the benchmark interest rate is 13.75 per cent, saddling the government, consumers and companies with onerous financing costs.

Bolsonaro has promised to reduce the number of government ministries and crack down on public-sector perks and social security fraud. But he has otherwise yet to spell out fully how he would achieve the ambitious fiscal retrenchment, which analysts say could be politically challenging to deliver as the economy decelerates.

Though Bolsonaro's proposed cuts are more modest in percentage terms than Milei's shock therapy in Argentina,

Cuts pledge: Flávio Bolsonaro rallies support in São Paulo last month. Below, leftwing leader Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva Andre Penner/AP Photo

his promises of fiscal rectitude have been welcomed by investors. Local stocks and the Brazilian real surged after Sunday's first-round result.

"We believe the positive confidence shock of a Flávio Bolsonaro win could result in a reduction in interest rates over the medium term and thus help to improve fiscal dynamics in Brazil," said Jared Lou, a portfolio manager at William Blair.

Bolsonaro's plans include an unspecified debt-to-GDP target, which if not respected, could trigger budgetary restraints. His team has also promised to roll back Lula's tax increases.

Yet for all the market enthusiasm, there are questions about the feasibility of pushing through unpopular austerity as a period of solid growth under Lula loses momentum. Mandatory items such as social security and wages consume about 90 per cent of Brazil's budget, leaving the government little room for manoeuvre without legislative changes.

The country's sizeable interest bill is another burden on the public coffers. Its primary budget deficit – meaning before interest payments – is forecast to be 0.4 per cent of GDP in 2026. But after factoring in debt costs, the gap balloons to 8.9 per cent, outstripping most of the world's biggest economies.

To prevent debt rising further, some economists reckon that a primary surplus of around 2.5 per cent is required.

Still, strong rightwing gains in legislative elections on Sunday bolstered investor faith in Bolsonaro's economic agenda. His Liberal Party expanded its presence as the single largest force in Congress and should be able to build majorities in both houses with the support of other conservatives and centrist parties, according to analysts.

Cost savings could potentially be found by targeting areas such as so-called public sector “supersalaries” that exceed a constitutional cap and ending a rule that pegs certain benefits and pensions to minimum wage increases.

However, they would face resistance from affected groups and lobbying, with parliamentary approval needed for certain measures such as privatisations or the removal of corporate tax breaks.

'We don't think Flávio will be able to deliver everything he is putting on the table'

"We don't think Flávio will be able to deliver everything he is putting on the table, especially the full 1.5 per cent GDP spending cut," said Leonardo Meira Reis, political analyst at Eurasia Group consultancy.

“But more broadly he will be able to pass a new fiscal framework . . . Congress will strongly back his economic agenda from the get-go.”

He warned, however, that even a more conservative legislature would not automatically be fiscally disciplined. Lawmakers have gained a growing share of discretionary spending for pork-barrel projects, which may prove difficult to rein in.

Lula's Workers' Party this week said that social policies and public services could be hit by his rightwing rival, adding that funding for things such as school meals and free medicines was squeezed or frozen under the candidate's father. Bolsonaro's father was criticised internationally for gutting environmental enforcement agencies.

Marcelo Kayath, a banker who has acted as an intermediary between Bolsonaro and the financial sector, said the candidate was committed to maintaining welfare schemes in the deeply unequal country, calling it a “compassionate rightwing” approach.

“[Bolsonaro] has no desire to cut social programmes or place the burden of fiscal adjustment on the poorest classes,” said Kayath, former head of Credit Suisse in Brazil.

But he warned that serious cuts elsewhere were unavoidable: "We have no alternative. Either this, or we could face a crisis a few months down the line.

"If we don't make the adjustment in a co-ordinated, constructive manner, the market will do it . . . in an uncontrolled way. [That] would trigger a recession far more acute and severe than necessary." Additional reporting by Beatriz Langella

Economy

Germany's state spending set to spur fastest growth in four years

OLAF STORBECK — FRANKFURT

Germany's economy is heading for its fastest growth in four years as exports and government debt-funded spending help end years of stagnation, according to the latest official forecasts.

Europe's largest economy is expected to expand by 1.3 per cent this year, more than twice the 0.5 per cent growth projected by the government in April. For 2027, Berlin expects a GDP increase of 1.1 per cent.

"The German economy is on a growth path and has proved more resilient than expected," the economics ministry said yesterday, adding that GDP "expanded strongly" over the first six months of the year "despite the conflict in the Middle East and higher energy prices".

Germany's economy had been stuck in a rut since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, as higher energy prices and widespread uncertainty pushed the country into the longest stagnation in its modern history. On a quarterly basis, economic output only surpassed its late-2022 peak in the first half of 2026.

Last year, Chancellor Friedrich Merz's coalition embarked on a massive debt-funded investment programme, earmarking €1tn to be spent on infrastructure and defence over the next decade.

“Fiscal stimulus from the special funds and defence spending is expected to have a noticeable impact on public investment and government consumption” by 2028, the government said yesterday.

The economy's resilient performance comes despite the US-Iran war sparking a second energy price shock in less than five years.

After the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran at the end of February, the oil price surged from below \$70 a barrel to above \$100, prompting two interest rate increases by the European Central Bank since June. Traders have fully priced in a third quarter-point rise in rates to 2.75 per cent by early 2027.

Fears about rising inflation and government debt in the US and Europe have sent bond prices haywire in recent weeks. Yields on German 10-year government bonds climbed to 3.64 per cent in late September, the highest level in more than 15 years, although France has become the main focus of concerns in the Eurozone.

The new German government forecasts show that higher energy prices are weighing heavily on household spending, however. Private consumption is expected to rise by only 0.3 per cent this year, compared with 1.3 per cent in 2025. The government expects the inflationary shock to persist throughout 2027, forecasting an average inflation rate of 3 per cent next year, up from 2.7 per cent in 2026.

Instead, the recovery is being driven by exports and investment. This year, investment spending is expected to increase by 0.6 per cent, while exports are forecast to increase by 3.7 per cent, helping to offset weak household consumption.

Part of the higher 2026 growth is also a statistical effect resulting from a recent upward revision of GDP estimates for 2024 and 2025 by Germany's statistical office.

Choose the Financial Times subscription for you

- React to trusted global news everywhere you go, with ft.com and FT apps

• Get the iconic FT newspaper delivered to your home or office from Monday to Saturday

• Enjoy our award-winning lifestyle journalism with FTWeekend

Subscribe today at ft.com/subscribetoday

The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

Italian politics

Meloni ballot law victory poses threat to her second-term hopes

AMY KAZMIN — ROME

Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni won a rare political victory yesterday after parliament approved a controversial overhaul of the country's electoral system.

An election law – ostensibly designed to promote Italy’s long-term political stability – was approved by 227 votes to 164 in a secret ballot by lawmakers after Meloni threatened to resign if it were rejected.

“Whoever wins the elections must be able to govern, and whoever is elected must answer to the voters who chose them,” Meloni wrote in a social media post after the vote, adding that the new law would “promote the stability and parliamentary coherence of any government, regardless of its political colour”.

However, analysts say her victory may prove pyrrhic as it could complicate her three-party rightwing coalition's quest to secure a second term in Italy's upcoming general elections, due to be held by the end of next year.

The new law incentivises parties to forge large pre-election alliances, which will force Meloni to make tough choices about whether or not to ally with her far-right nemesis, ex-military general Roberto Vannacci, to bolster her fraying coalition's prospects or risk defeat by the centre-left opposition.

"The irony is that the law was devised to help her and it's going to create a lot of trouble for her," said Daniele Albertazzi, a political scientist at the University of Surrey. "Now she absolutely needs to decide what to do with Vannacci. She cannot leave it until after the elections. She has to decide beforehand."

The electoral system may also face legal hurdles before it can take effect, as civil groups are geared up to challenge the law in the constitutional court.

The contentious new election system – sometimes called the Stabilicum, or Melonellum – is designed to end Italy's chronic political turmoil by ensuring elections deliver clear winners, whose ability to govern will be bolstered by a “majority prize” of up to 17.5 per cent of the seats in each house of parliament.

It eliminates first-past-the-post constituencies – which account for about a third of parliament seats – and moves the country to a system of full proportional representation, a format in which the centre right tends to fare better. It also establishes the majority prize pot of seats to be awarded to the winning pre-election alliance, provided it secures at least 42 per cent of the vote.

To qualify as a pre-election alliance, parties must agree on a joint prime ministerial candidate and political programme before the vote – a requirement already causing friction between the centre-left Democratic Party and its ostensible partner, the populist Five Star Movement.

But with Vannacci's fledgling far-right National Future party now eroding popular support from the traditional base of Meloni and her allies, it would also be tough for her coalition to hit the minimum 42 per cent needed to claim the majority bonus unless they take him into the coalition.

Giorgia Meloni had said she would resign if reforms were rejected

Lawmakers had griped about other details of the new law that threaten to sharply raise campaign costs for individual candidates and will result in a big drop in women's representation.

Albertazzi said Meloni would try to sell the reform to voters as a significant achievement after her attempt to overhaul the justice system was rejected in a constitutional referendum this year.

“She knows it might turn against her, but it’s too late. She really prizes the idea of being consistent, coherent and not making U-turns,” he added.

Roberto D'Alimonte, an expert in Italian election systems at Rome's Luiss University, warned that the law may not deliver on its promise of stability.

If no coalition reached the 42 per cent threshold needed to secure the majority bonus, he said Italy could face renewed political turmoil as the seats would then be distributed via proportional representation.

2026/2027 TOP JOB 2026 BEST EMPLOYERS

THE BEST EMPLOYER IN ITALY.

The German Institute for Quality and Finance (ITQF) has awarded De Cecco a perfect score 100/100 points after evaluating over 400 leading companies in Italy.

For nearly two centuries, De Cecco has known that quality makes the difference. From the finest raw materials to our unique production methods, excellence begins with the people behind our products. That's why we put our people at the heart of everything we do.

INTERNATIONAL

Flydubai terror suspect's misogyny exposed in history of online rants

Co-pilot being held in United Arab Emirates also expressed conservative interpretations of Islam

CHLOE CORNISH — DUBAI CHRIS COOK AND PETER CAMPBELL LONDON

The Flydubai co-pilot who tried to hijack a flight to Tel Aviv is a former cryptocurrency speculator who four years ago was living with his parents and calling women “rotten meat” on a now disabled social media account.

Public information about Omani-Syrian aviator Hamam al-Hammami is scarce. Emirati investigators are keeping a tight hold on information gleaned from their interrogation of the would-be hijacker, diplomats say, and his online presence has been mysteriously scrubbed.

But the FT has reviewed the then 25-year-old's prodigious online output between November 2021 and October 2022, totalling more than 3,000 posts on Twitter. Although his account has been deleted, the posts are still available on an internet archive.

Often sending dozens of tweets in Arabic per day, Hammami bickered with other users, dispensed advice, opined about nutrition and fitness, and enthused about flying, which he called the “safest means of transportation”.

His frequently furious online presence fused highly conservative interpretations of Islam with the sexist language of the “manosphere”, a misogynist online movement that derides feminism and promotes sexist gender roles. There are also hints of conservative religious beliefs, with Hammami saying he did not listen to music.

How and when Hammami was radicalised remains unknown.

Emirati interrogators are also investigating whether or not Hammami acted alone when he used an emergency axe to attack his pilot and attempt to take control of the plane on September 30. The United Arab Emirates has said this was a terrorist act. Israeli investigators are convinced Hammami was a lone wolf, people briefed on the matter said.

But this insistence has failed to assuage anger in Israel over what critics are calling systemic security failures, with media reports that Hammami was flagged as having radical views by his previous employer, Oman Air, and relegated to a desk job.

The co-pilot spent time in multiple countries in the Middle East. According to Hammami's tweets, his Omani father wed his mother, a member of the Shamar tribe from southern Syria, in 1993. She "raised us on religion, morals, and virtue", Hammami tweeted.

moved to Syria in 2011 – the year the Arab Spring inflamed the region – a person familiar with the matter said. The teenager then lived for four years in the country as it was engulfed in civil war, a conflict that spawned and sustained a plethora of Islamist militant groups.

Air drama: the Flydubai jet involved in an attempted hijacking at Isreal's Ben Gurion airport on September 30. Below, Hamam al-Hammami Ammar Awad/Reuters;

Hammami undertook aviation studies in Australia from 2015 to 2017, where he said he had lodged with two local families, but did not graduate. In 2018 to 2019, he spent six months studying in New Zealand, one of the world's two major pilot training centres, with a flying school that was subsequently taken over by a British company, according to New Zealand officials.

Hammami did an online course with a British university, although he never entered the UK, according to people with knowledge of the situation. One of Hammami's tweets mentions that his brother studied in the UK.

His five years in the west, he tweeted, were the “golden years of my religious commitment”, although he said his observweeted, were the “golden years of my religious commitment”, although he said his observance lapsed upon his return to the Middle East.

The FT matched the details mentioned in his Twitter account with his biographical details and his profile on LinkedIn, also now deleted.

Investigators probing Hammami's private online search history have found that he accessed extremist Islamist content while he was living in Australia, according to two people familiar with the investigation. Rather than complete his flying qualifications abroad, Hammami returned to Oman and got a job at the state-owned airline, a move that he tweeted was the “best decision I ever made”. Oman Air did not respond to a request for comment on his employment there.

Around 2019, Hammami got into spot trading and cryptocurrency speculation, a mistake he later blamed on being tempted by “the devil”. His investments ended in failure and he said he lost “120,000” – while he did not specify the currency, if it were Omani rials that would be a loss of more than \$300,000.

Aged 25 by 2022, Hammami lived with his lawyer father and homemaker mother in a classy neighbourhood in the Omani capital Muscat. “I wouldn’t dare think about moving out of my family’s house as long as I’m not married,” he tweeted. Hammami joined Twitter – now rebranded as X – in late 2021, and was desperate to secure an arranged marriage. “I’m 25 and I want to get married today, before tomorrow!” he tweeted in January 2022.

He stipulated that the lady should be an 18 to 23-year-old religious Saudi from a tribal background, wear a face-covering niqab, agree not to work outside the

He had become convinced that most women 'care primarily about money' and were 'skilled at pretence'

home, and be willing to live abroad. He had no success using an online matchmaking platform for Muslims, he said, but had become convinced that most women “care primarily about money” and were “skilled at pretence”.

His posts regularly evoked violence against women and used derogatory sexual slurs. “Her only obligation is to lift her legs,” he wrote. Discussing a woman seeking a divorce over a dispute about posting pictures online, he said: “She needs a good thrashing.”

Hammami peppered his diatribes with the language of the manosphere, repeatedly using terms like “simp”, which refers to an affectionate man, or the approving moniker “Alpha” for a strong man – and interacting with accounts that promote sexist ideology.

Despite his vitriol against women, Hammami boasted about the approaches he received. “I have never touched a girl in my life,” he wrote in January 2022, “even though I swear I have many opportunities . . . God has protected us from temptations”, he added, saying he would not “chase after cheap, rotten flesh”.

The image contains only a stylistic horizontal line, which must be ignored according to the rules. According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored and not represented by underscores or any other character in the OCR output.

Therefore, the corrected OCR text is:

[empty string]

Additional reporting by Malaika Kanaaneh Tapper in Beirut and James Shotter and Neri Zilber in Jerusalem

The image contains only a stylistic horizontal line, which must be ignored according to Rule 2. No text or placeholder characters should be output.

Saudi Arabia

Scores of Riyadh flights cancelled after Houthis target airport

AHMED AL OMRAN — JEDDAH PETER CAMPBELL — LONDON

More than 100 flights from Riyadh were cancelled yesterday after the Houthis said they had targeted the capital's airport with a ballistic missile, as the conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran-backed rebels continues to escalate.

Residents reported that loud booms were heard in the city yesterday morning, and the Houthis claimed to have attacked the main King Khalid International airport with a ballistic missile.

There was no confirmation from Saudi authorities, and the Saudi-led coalition fighting the rebel group said it had intercepted two missiles over the capital.

Airlines including Lufthansa and Air India said they were suspending Riyadh flights for several days, while data from Cirium showed that 188 flights had been cancelled by mid-afternoon – more than 40 per cent of the day's services.

Scores of flights were cancelled at other Saudi airports including Jeddah and Dammam, Cirium said. King Khalid Airport said passengers should contact their airline directly to confirm flight status before travelling to the airport.

The US Embassy in Riyadh said American government employees working in Saudi Arabia now required a “special authorisation” to use the airport and that they should stay away from the border with Yemen “due to safety risks”. The Saudi Civil Aviation Authority did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Fragments from the interception of a ballistic missile caused damage to a medical clinic complex and a kindergarten, Saudi civil defence officials said.

The flight disruptions come as Saudi Arabia gears up to hold major events, including the World Petroleum Congress next week followed by the Future Investment Initiative conference — its flagship annual event that attracts top executives, investors and bankers from around the world — on October 26 to 29.

The barrage came after the kingdom said three people had been killed and dozens injured in Houthi attacks on Saudi airports earlier this week, including Riyadh. A Sudanese man was killed and seven others were injured in an attack on King Khalid airport on Wednesday, Saudi aviation authorities said. Two women were killed and 30 people injured in a strike on Abha airport in the south-west on Tuesday.

The attacks were claimed by the Iran-backed Houthis, who warned international airlines that they would continue to target Saudi airspace, according to a statement by Brigadier General Yahya Saree, a spokesperson for the group.

The Yemeni armed forces said yesterday it had conducted 2,103 “precision-targeting operations” against the Houthis, according to the government-linked Saba state news agency.

Separately Donald Trump said the US would not strike Iran ahead of the midterm elections, adding on his Truth Social platform yesterday that Washington and Tehran were “having productive discussions”.

Attack on civilians

Beijing visit

Russia bus stop bomb kills dozens in Ukraine

CHRISTOPHER MILLER — KYIV

A Russian glide bomb killed dozens of Ukrainians at a bus stop in the eastern city of Kramatorsk yesterday, in one of the deadliest attacks on civilians in recent months.

Two buses were hit by the bomb during rush hour, killing at least 30 people and injuring 18, according to Ukraine's state emergency service. A separate attack nearby killed another three people, the authorities said.

"Some of those killed have still not been identified because of the severity of their injuries," President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said. Many of those injured in the attack were fighting for their lives, he said, warning the death toll may rise.

The strike came after Zelenskyy told the FT last week that Vladimir Putin, Russian president, had instructed his generals to abandon all rules of war in Ukraine. Deliberately targeting civilians is considered a war crime under international law.

Russia has used aerial bombs since its full-scale invasion in 2022, launching them from behind the front line to destroy entire buildings.

"Russia is systematically destroying Kramatorsk and terrorising civilians," Dmytro Lubinets, the Ukrainian parliament's commissioner for human rights, wrote on X. Regional governor Vadym Filashkin said on Telegram that the victims “are not ‘the consequences of war’, nor dry statistics. These are people killed by the Russian army”.

He said public transport in Kramatorsk and the neighbouring city of Slovyansk had been suspended because of the threat of Russian attacks.

Victims not a consequence of war ‘nor dry statistics. These are people killed by the Russian army’

The bus stop bombing came a day after a wave of Russian missiles and drones killed at least 28 people across Ukraine, including 22 in an attack on an apartment building in Pryluky, about 150km east of Kyiv.

The building suffered a direct hit from a Russian missile, burying residents beneath debris. Dozens of injured people were pulled out by rescuers — as were the lifeless bodies of four children. In Kyiv, three people were killed in Wednesday's strikes, Vitali Klitschko, the capital's mayor said.

The combined death toll from Russian strikes over the past day and a half has risen to at least 64 people.

Yesterday, sirens howled throughout Kyiv as explosions from Russian drone strikes and Ukrainian air defence interceptions shook the city's buildings.

DTEK, Ukraine's largest energy operator, said it had imposed power cuts in Kyiv and the surrounding region after Russian strikes hit its energy facilities for a second straight day.

Zelenskyy told the FT that Putin was increasing his attacks on civilians because the Russian army had failed to achieve its military goals on the battlefield.

Ukrainian forces have made gains along the eastern frontline in the Donbas in recent weeks, thwarting Russian efforts to encircle Kramatorsk and nearby cities that make up Ukraine's "fortress belt", according to military analysts who track the war.

“Over the month of September, the Russian net gains were negative 190km $^{2}$ ,” the Finland-based Black Bird Group, reported last week. “This marks the greatest monthly net territorial loss for Russia in our dataset since the June of 2023.”

Zelenskyy said last week Ukraine's counteroffensive, Operation Vivaldi, had liberated 125-140 sq km of territory.

EU envoy to press China on trade gap in talks

EDWARD WHITE — SHANGHAI ANDY BOUNDS — BRUSSELS

The EU's top trade envoy has arrived in Beijing for high-level talks with China as the bloc urges the world's manufacturing powerhouse to take concrete steps to reduce its ballooning surplus.

Maroš Šefčovič, EU commissioner, arrived in the Chinese capital yesterday for a two-day trip that will include meetings with Wang Wentao, China's commerce minister, as the sides try to reduce trade tensions.

The talks come against a backdrop of rising anger in many European capitals that Beijing has not done enough to address a trade surplus that has swelled to €1bn a day.

European officials blame the flood of low-cost Chinese exports for the loss of tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs in the bloc. Šefčovič has said previously China is threatening Europe's social model as well as its industry.

Before the talks, the FT reported that China had rejected an EU request to limit exports of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, shipments of which have surged in the wake of tariffs on Chinese battery-only electric vehicles.

European officials have warned that the Beijing talks will fail if there is no solution to the issue of hybrid cars, setting the scene for a potential rapid deterioration in trade relations between the two economies.

While Beijing has refused to cut its exports, it appeared to offer expanded direct investment in Europe while allowing higher imports from the bloc.

China has also kept the door open to negotiations over minimum prices for its EV exports, in return for the lifting of anti-subsidy tariffs of up to 35 per cent.

However, such offers are viewed as insufficient to satisfy European officials, who are pressing Beijing to drop some of its tariffs to make it easier for EU exports to compete with domestic Chinese producers. China, for its part, wants the EU to lift restrictions on technology exports, including chipmaking equipment from ASML of the Netherlands.

Trade impasse: Beijing has refused to cut exports of hybrid cars

Chinese officials have also repeatedly warned of the possibility of a strong response to any further restrictions on the country's companies or products. Beijing's playbook of retaliation includes possible restrictions on exports of critical minerals, or tariffs of its own.

“China will respond resolutely to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese industries,” the commerce ministry said last week.

Germany and France this week sent a letter to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen proposing a last-resort trade instrument with the power to cut off China's access to the EU's single market, if needed.

The sharper measures were a response to increased “weaponisation of trade, systemic market distorting-practices and global macroeconomic imbalances”, the two countries wrote.

Chinese state media has argued that the EU's use of “unilateral tools aimed at China” while the two sides are engaged in talks has “eroded the EU's sincerity in dialogue”.

FTWeekend

Autumn design special: the new heritage

Ski special: the Godzilla El Niño, France's secret valley and the best new snow hotels

Hannah Arendt and why friendship matters more than truth

A new Roman Empire

Lunch with the FT: Computer scientist David Silver

Pick up your copy this weekend or subscribe online at ft.com/subscribe [EMPTY]

INTERNATIONAL

Visa crackdown

US bans foreign worker sponsorship in tech

Move marks latest effort to limit immigration by the White House

JOE MILLER AND ELLA LEE WASHINGTON

RAFE ROSNER-UDDIN — SAN FRANCISCO The Trump administration has temporarily banned Microsoft, Adobe and several other tech companies from sponsoring workers for permanent US residency, claiming they have abused immigration programmes at the expense of US citizens.

"There has been no company in the

US, unfortunately, that has abused this system more than Microsoft," vice-president JD Vance said yesterday.

He claimed the H-1B visa programme for highly skilled foreign workers “has become rife with fraud,” and that overreliance on such schemes “is a fundamental insult to the American worker and to the American way of life”.

Six other IT outsourcing companies – including Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL and Capgemini – were also suspended from the Permanent Labor Certification programme, which allows US employers to hire foreign workers.

The administration also announced it had launched a fraud investigation into the use of J-1 student visas at nine universities: University of Pittsburgh, Yale, Harvard, Stanford, Brown, UC Davis, Caltech, Arizona State and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

“Subpoenas have been served; investigations are under way and nobody will be getting a free pass because their name is carved into an expensive building,” said Inspector General Anthony D'Esposito.

Adobe and other named IT firms did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Microsoft said the “vast majority” of its US staff were Americans. "We look forward to providing the Administration with additional information," the company added.

The Trump administration has previously taken aim at H-1B visas, which are widely used by tech companies and specialist industries.

Last year, the White House attempted to impose a \$100,000 fee on new applications, but the increase was blocked by a federal court. In June, Judge Leo Sorokin ruled the fee amounted to an unauthorised tax, and infringed on Congress's authority to raise funds.

The Trump administration has appealed against the ruling, which is pending before a federal appeals court. Before the rise in fees, the US charged \$215 to register for the H-1B visa lottery and \$780 more for employers sponsoring applicants. More than 400,000 such visas were approved last year.

Amazon, which is the biggest recipient of H-1B visas, was not mentioned in Vance's comments yesterday.

The Trump administration was due to honour Microsoft chief executive Satya Nadella, who will be given the National Medal of Technology and Innovation at a separate event yesterday. But Vance said that there was no contradiction between the two announcements.

Asia. Motherhood 'penalty'

Chinese women use surrogates to avoid childbirth

Agencies and consultancies are connecting would-be parents with overseas services

ELEANOR OLCOTT — BEIJING

For 25-year-old Chinese entrepreneur Kitty Sheng, the physical and professional cost of pregnancy seems so high that she would rather have a baby via a foreign surrogate.

The beauty entrepreneur from Hangzhou said pregnancy would "impact my work and appearance", as she detailed plans to travel to Georgia in eastern Europe next year to find a surrogate.

"If I remain unmarried, I will have to bear all the costs of pregnancy and postpartum recovery myself, and that really isn't very different from the cost of having a child through surrogacy," she said.

With surrogacy illegal in China, an industry of agencies, consultants and fertility clinics has emerged to connect clients with women overseas willing to carry their children. While there is no data on the number of children born to Chinese parents via surrogacy, a recent study showed nearly a third of intended parents for surrogate babies in the US were international and some 40 per cent of those were from China.

Early demand largely came from couples struggling with fertility. But there was growing interest from younger women physically capable of becoming pregnant but reluctant to accept its impact on their bodies and careers, said consultants, clients and doctors interviewed by the FT.

"The ‘motherhood penalty’ persists over a long period in China," said Lu Pin, a Chinese women's rights activist based in New York. "The fear is well founded and a product of how the environment works against women in both public and private lives."

Wealthy Chinese people tend to opt for the US for surrogacy, attracted by its advanced medical facilities, strong legal protections for the parents and the prospect of a US passport for the child. The bill can be as much as \$300,000.

US President Donald Trump has sought to stop children born via surrogacy to foreign parents having the right to birthright citizenship in an executive order issued in August, after a first attempt to curtail the right was struck down by the Supreme Court.

Other destinations include Georgia and Kyrgyzstan, where packages can cost as little as \$63,000.

Pregnant women at a fitness class in Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province. China last year registered its lowest number of births since records began Liang Zidong/VCG/Getty

The demand for surrogacy hints at the underlying cultural and professional reasons for birth hesitancy among women, experts say. China last year registered its lowest number of births since records began, marking the fourth consecutive year of population decline.

Demographers estimate that the average age a woman has her first child was 28.6 in 2024, up from 24.3 in 2006. Women in more affluent cities had babies later than rural counterparts, with the average age in Shanghai at 31.8.

Experts also described increased demand from younger women unwilling to accept the impact on their bodies and careers.

Xiao Yi, a traditional Chinese medicine doctor at a Beijing-based hospital specialising in fertility, said she had seen a “very clear increase among patients who are fearful of getting pregnant and giving birth”.

'Chinese women worry about how it will impact their appearance'

“Chinese women worry about how it will impact their appearance and whether they can return to their normal weight and womb health,” she said. These fears were echoed by several women who spoke to the FT about their reluctance to get pregnant.

A salesperson at a leading California-based fertility agency described a rise in the number of enquiries from single men and women. "They may not want to enter marriage, but they still want to become mothers and fathers," the person said.

For some younger Chinese people, the decision is also being underwritten by their parents. Several people who spoke to the FT said their own parents had offered to pay for surrogacy, seeing it as a way to secure grandchildren despite their own children's reluctance to marry or go through pregnancy themselves.

That bargain reflects the significant role grandparents already play in raising children in China. Grandparents will frequently move in with their adult children or take on much of the day-to-day childcare.

One couple, finance workers from Beijing who declined to be named, said that they were the first within their friendship groups to pursue surrogacy in the US. “We have more and more friends going through this journey,” said the husband.

The couple opted for surrogacy because the wife was reluctant to go through pregnancy and childbirth. “I didn’t want to give birth to a baby. It’s a risk to your body and health and you hear about crazy stories about the side effects for women giving birth,” she said.

For Sheng, the logic for using a surrogate is beyond doubt. “Whether it’s the fact that my career is in a growth phase, that I care about my appearance, or that I don’t want to get married — those are all considerations for myself,” she said.

Housing market

American mortgage rates climb to highest in three years

ZEHRA MUNIR — NEW YORK

US mortgage rates have hit their highest level since 2023, further eroding housing affordability with just a month to go before the midterm elections.

The 30-year fixed mortgage rate averaged 7.4 per cent as of yesterday, an increase of 0.12 percentage points from a week ago, Freddie Mac data showed yesterday.

Mortgage rates have increased for seven consecutive weeks, the longest run in three years, adding 0.84 percentage points to borrowing costs over that period. Rates are at their highest since early November 2023.

The recent ascent has been fuelled by rising yields on Treasuries due to the inflationary pressures of US President Donald Trump's war against Iran and expectations that the Federal Reserve will continue to raise interest rates in an effort to reduce prices.

The rise in mortgage rates presents a source of consternation for Republicans as they battle to keep control of the Senate and House in the midterms.

The Fed in September increased its benchmark funds rate for the first time in three years as it seeks to prevent the surge in energy prices from spiralling into a broader inflationary crisis.

Traders are attaching just a 20 per cent chance that the central bank will raise rates at its meeting this month, just days before the elections, but see a 76 per cent chance that the Fed will have raised rates at least once by the end of the year.

The 30-year mortgage rate dipped below 6 per cent in late February for the first time since September 2022, days before the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran.

It has risen 1.4 percentage points since the start of the conflict.

That has contributed to a darkening mood in the housing market over the past few months, with the cost of construction up and potential sellers waiting it out until rates slide back down.

“Buyers are pulling back in response to ongoing affordability challenges, while sellers are showing flexibility,” said Hannah Jones, senior economist at Realtor.com.

About one-fifth of listings had a price cut last month, according to Jones, which was the highest share in four years. Inventory and pending home sales were also soft.

“Altogether, September’s housing data points to a market stalled by mounting affordability pressure. Buyers have more options at lower price points, but elevated mortgage rates keep home ownership out of reach for many,” Jones said.

About a fifth of listings had a price cut last month, Realtor.com said

Canadian author

Carson awarded Nobel Prize in literature

MARIA CRAWFORD AND CONSTANCE AYRTON

The Canadian author Anne Carson, known for her formally inventive and genre-crossing approach to poetry, prose and translation, has won the 2026 Nobel Prize in literature.

Carson, 76, was given the award “for her bold and inventive oeuvre that, in playful dialogue with the classical tradition, has created new forms for contemporary literature”, the Nobel committee said yesterday.

Born in Toronto in 1950, Carson has published dozens of works of poetry, translation and literary non-fiction since 1986, while teaching at universities across Canada and the US. Her translations from classical Greek include works by Sappho, Sophocles and Euripides. But it is her intertwining of the classical and the starkly contemporary that has won her international critical acclaim.

Anders Olsson, chair of the Nobel Committee for Literature, praised Carson's "playful and ironic works that move not only between classical and modern poetry but also between different genres and art forms". Her collaborations with visual artists, choreographers, opera and theatre directors — including an adaptation of Sophocles' Antigone directed by Ivo van Hove — have lent her writing a "strongly performative aspect", Olsson added.

Highlighting Autobiography of Red

'She is really an author for our time. Nobody writes like her, and nobody would dare to do this in this way'

(1998), Carson's widely translated novel-in-verse that bridges the myth of Herakles with a modern-day teenager's experience of unrequited infatuation, Olsson said the author possessed an "extraordinary ability to give the classical literary tradition an intensely contemporary feel".

The form and juxtapositions in Carson's work speak to her humour and curiosity about literary styles and figures alike. In Float (2016), her verse was printed on more than 20 chapbooks in a modular book structure that readers could open and reorder as they wish. The FT's reviewer said the poems in the collection "confront the artifice of order and question the linearity of memory".

In The Beauty of the Husband (2001), which won the TS Eliot Prize, the betrayals and bitterness of a doomed marriage are ironically punctuated by the romantic poetry of John Keats.

The literature prize, which comes with prize money of SKr12mn (£900,000), is the fourth of the six annual Nobels that are being announced on successive weekdays. The winners of the peace and economics prizes follow today and on Monday.

Ingrid Carlberg, permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy, made yesterday's announcement a few minutes after reaching Carson by telephone. Carson was "very taken by surprise", and was "in Iceland, listening to the wind".

“She is really an author for our time,” said committee member Steve Sem-Sandberg. “Nobody writes like her, and nobody would dare to do this in this way.”

Lobbyist

Republika Srpska link to Trump's chief of staff

AMY MACKINNON — POTOČARI

The daughter of Susie Wiles, Donald Trump's chief of staff, is working for a US lobbying firm that signed a \$35,000-a-month contract to represent Republika Srpska, the Balkan entity at the centre of a new dispute over conflicts of interest inside the White House.

Katie Wiles is a partner at Continental Strategy, which signed its contract to lobby for the self-governing entity within Bosnia and Herzegovina in February, according to federal filings.

The firm said she had visited Republika Srpska in connection with a different contract, adding she had not lobbied US officials on behalf of the enclave.

In September, Susie Wiles met Željka Cvijanović, the Serb member of Bosnia's tripartite presidency, according to a post on Cvijanović's social media account. "It was a pleasure to speak today at the White House with Susie Wiles, Chief of Staff and closest collaborator of US President Donald Trump, about the situation in [Bosnia and Herzegovina] and the region," Cvijanović wrote of the meeting, which took place weeks ahead of elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

A White House official said the request for Susie Wiles to meet Cvi-janović came from Alex Garcia, a partner at Continental Strategy who served as deputy political director of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign.

Susie Wiles did not discuss work mat-

Katie Wiles, Susan Wiles' daughter, is a partner at Continental Strategy

ters with her daughters, the official said.

Continental Strategy said Garcia was registered to lobby for Republika Srpska and was present in the region during elections on October 4. Garcia was the only person with the firm who had interacted with the US government in relation to Republika Srpska, it said.

The group said Katie Wiles visited the enclave in mid-August on behalf of a US company conducting a feasibility study in the region. Wiles provided communications support for that company but had never spoken to any US government official on Republic Srpska, it said.

The revelations are likely to raise further questions on lobbying ties between members of Trump's inner circle on behalf of Republika Srpska.

On Tuesday, the New York Times reported that longstanding Trump aides Chris LaCivita and James Blair were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to give election advice to the Serb-majority entity ahead of elections last Sunday.

Trump later distanced himself from LaCivita, his former campaign manager, and Blair, who served as deputy White House chief of staff until recently.

Made in Munich BMW bets it can build ‘the cars of the future’ in Germany as domestic rivals shift capacity abroad ➕ PAGE 11

Companies & Markets

Kirkland halts financial data releases for law firm rankings

- Withdrawal from AmLaw surveys - Figures not ‘meaningful’ for clients

OLIVER BARNES — NEW YORK

Kirkland & Ellis will stop sharing its financial figures with the legal industry's flagship ranking of profits and revenues, concluding it is no longer "appropriate or necessary" to disclose results.

The world's highest-grossing law firm told The American Lawyer, an industry magazine that has for decades relied on firms to voluntarily produce their financial data for the ranking, that it would no longer share the information.

As a US private partnership, Kirkland does not disclose the global figures elsewhere, though its UK business files accounts with Companies House.

In a letter sent to AmLaw and obtained by the FT, the firm said disclos-

Chicago-founded Kirkland has grown to the largest law firm by revenue – with AmLaw charting its rise

ing the information did not provide “meaningful value” to its clients and having it included in rankings “could incentivise quantitative metrics over qualitative strengths”.

Kirkland lawyers were informed of the decision in a firm-wide email.

It comes at a time when pay for top lawyers has soared with the most successful earning tens of millions of dollars per year — potentially irking some clients, many of whom earn less than the lawyers they hire.

AmLaw told the FT its ranking would continue to provide a reliable picture of the market. "At every phase, including rare instances where a firm declines survey participation, we draw on the same rigorous reporting methods used in our award-winning journalism — robust engagement with the organisations we cover and serve, independent research, and deep connection with knowledgeable and trusted market sources," the publication said in a statement.

Kirkland declined to comment.

Chicago-founded Kirkland has grown to the largest law firm by revenue – with AmLaw charting its rapid rise. Its decision could encourage rivals to take the same step, a move that would further obscure visibility into the financial performance of an increasingly lucrative but opaque sector of the economy.

Kirkland's disclosures for 2025 showed a record \$10.6bn in revenue, up from \$8.8bn the previous year. The firm's equity partners, who share in its profits, were paid an average of \$11.1mn, a 20 per cent increase on 2024.

Kirkland's executive committee has for several years considered withholding financial performance data from AmLaw, according to a person close to the firm. Kirkland's leadership was disgruntled with how AmLaw's metric of average profits per equity partner figure did not account for the wide variance of pay at the firm, the person added.

It is the latest move by a large law firm to shield details of its financial performance. Freshfields announced in 2023, when average per-partner profits were £2.09mn, that it would no longer voluntarily report its financial results.

Freshfields' global managing partner Rick van Aerssen said at the time that, rather than numbers, its progress should be "based on the quality of business we've built and the client mandates we're winning".

However, the firm is still required to publish accounts on Companies House so a number of its metrics are public.

New York firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and London's Slaughter and May also do not share results with AmLaw, which instead produces an estimate of their figures.

Landmark deal Tishman Speyer and partners seal takeover of New York's Chrysler Building

The \$235mn deal for the building comes as demand for luxury New York office space booms — Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

ZEHRA MUNIR — NEW YORK

The Chrysler Building, one of New York's most iconic skyscrapers, is being taken over and upgraded as demand for luxury office space in the city booms.

The building, a fixture of the New York City skyline for nearly a century, had fallen into disrepair and is less than 50 per cent occupied.

Commercial real estate company Tishman Speyer and investment partners have agreed a deal with private college Cooper Union, which has always owned the land the building stands on, for \$235mn as well as ground-lease payments.

The low price tag for the landmark indicates the state it is in. In 2008, the government of Abu Dhabi bought a 90 per cent stake in the building for \$800mn; just over a decade later, it was sold to real estate companies Signa and RFR for just \$150mn.

That figure also reflects the climbing rents that Cooper Union has been charging ground-lease holders.

Current rent has not been disclosed but in 2018 annual rent rose from \$7.75mn to \$32.5mn.

“We are pursuing an ambitious plan for the Chrysler Building at a historically strong moment for the Manhattan office market,” Tishman Speyer chief executive Rob Speyer said.

Speyer's company plans to restore the 77-storey Midtown building, seen in films including Spider-Man and Men in Black 3, at a time when its neighbours have secured expensive leases from financial and law firm tenants.

The Art Deco tower is less than a five-minute walk from Grand Central station, an area that has had a resurgence as companies try to shorten staff commutes. The area's revival has been fuelled by the new JPMorgan Chase headquarters just blocks away, raising the bar for luxury office space.

"The Chrysler Building enters a market with few alternatives for companies seeking a high-quality, amenity-filled environment directly above Grand Central Terminal," Tishman Speyer said in a statement.

The building was constructed almost 100 years ago to house the Chrysler Corporation. For a year, it was the world's tallest building before conceding the title to the Empire State Building. Tishman Speyer, which also owns and operates the Rockefeller Center, will restore its facade and polish and renew the crown atop it.

The number of leases signed for Manhattan office space priced at \$100 or more per square foot shot up to an all-time high last year, according to data from brokerages JLL and CBRE.

Manhattan's office leasing volume this year totals 32.9mn sq ft, its strongest year to date since 2000, when 40.1mn sq ft was recorded, according to a report by Colliers.

Goldman to pay top bosses \$500mn in bonus plan

SIMON FOY AND ORTENCA ALIAJ — LONDON JOSHUA FRANKLIN — NEW YORK

Goldman Sachs' most senior executives are in line to receive more than \$500mn in special bonuses from a five-year incentive plan, one of the biggest payouts of its kind in the Wall Street bank's history.

The lender is preparing to hand out equity awards to a group of its most senior leaders that would exceed \$500mn at its current share price, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The payout is part of a long-term incentive scheme the bank disclosed in 2021, with the final value of the bonus pool determined by the bank's stock market performance relative to peers at the end of October, meaning it could still change, another person said.

The bumper package, first reported by Bloomberg, comes after Goldman's share price outperformed most of its Wall Street rivals over the past five years. The special incentive scheme was agreed at a time when Wall Street banks were benefiting from record dealmaking and a boom in “blank cheque” companies as the industry rebounded from the Covid pandemic.

Goldman chief executive David Solomon is expected to receive the largest chunk of the bonus pool, taking home about \$100mn in share-based awards.

John Waldron, his second-in-command, is also among the beneficiaries of the scheme, as well as other members of Goldman's management committee from 2021 who are still with the bank.

The performance-based stock for Solomon was worth about \$30mn when Goldman announced the plan in 2021, and Waldron's was worth about \$20mn.

Solomon and Waldron, who is Goldman's president and chief operating officer, have led the investment bank since 2018. The pair were also both granted five-year retention bonuses, worth \$80mn apiece, at the start of 2025. Goldman paid Solomon \$47mn last year, an increase of more than one-fifth from the previous year.

The first half of his tenure was marred by a lossmaking expansion into retail banking, but after billions of dollars in losses, Goldman largely exited the consumer push and has since doubled down on investment banking, trading and money management. The bank's shares are up about 180 per cent over the past three years.

Big Tech makes its pitch on AI agents as development race heats up

BUSINESS INSIGHT TECHNOLOGY Richard Waters

n the years before the iPhone, there was general agreement in the tech world that mobile access to the internet would be the next big thing.

But it took many false starts, from Windows Mobile to Nokia's Symbian operating system, before Apple showed the way, in the process resetting the direction for much of the tech industry.

Something similar seems to be happening now with the development of AI agents. Many tech leaders believe software that can take actions on your behalf, removing the drudgery of routine work and personal tasks, represents a huge opportunity.

But exactly what form this will take is less clear. The rewards for finding the right formula are likely to be huge — personal agents could become a new entry point to the digital world and turn their makers into the next gatekeepers.

So far, these include Muse from Meta and dots from OpenAI while Microsoft has revamped its Copilot assistant to act more autonomously, Apple added agentic features to its Siri assistant in its latest iOSG and Google launched a new work assistant in Gemini. Several startups are also angling for attention, most notably Instinct, which launched an invitation-only test over the summer.

The contrast between Meta's Muse and OpenAI's dots shows how far apart the agent visions are. Both feature cute mascots and come from groups with a large number of users but their intentions could hardly be more different.

Meta pitched its agent as a tool for handling day-to-day tasks of all kinds.

By contrast, OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman brushed such things off as almost beneath his company's interest, dwelling instead on the kind of complex work tasks you would normally give to a "high-agency engineer or chief of staff".

Other companies' agents generally fall somewhere in between.

To some extent, the positioning appears to be as much a reflection of the business models of the groups concerned as a sign of where agentic AI is likely to have its most immediate impact.

people to learn entirely new digital habits. Central to that will be instilling trust.

For Muse, that means extending Meta's advertising business into taking a

As Microsoft showed two years ago, when an AI feature designed to remember everything a user did on their PC provoked a privacy outcry, new capabilities need to be handled with care.

Central to the question of product design is the extent to which companies need to display the capabilities of their new agents, rather than just leaving people to find their own way.

Dash to roll out new services has moved into high gear with a series of launches from the industry's leading groups

cut from transactions its agent instigates, making itself more central to ecommerce. It may be a difficult evolution.

Muse takes the hand-holding approach, peppering users with suggestions of things to do, while OpenAI maintains more of a blank canvas. Microsoft's latest Copilot offers a choice between three different tabs, including a new Autopilot mode for agents that can take on longer work tasks.

At the moment, about two-thirds of

travel, commerce and reservation sites on the internet block Muse in some way according to analysts at Jefferies, putting pressure on Meta to forge more direct links with individual sites. As these links harden into commercial deals and traffic is steered inside a new ecommerce ecosystem, the buying habits of billions of people could be at stake.

OpenAI, by contrast, hopes to monetise the more intensive use of its work agents through high-priced subscriptions with dots at first available only to customers on ChatGPT subscription plans of at least \$100 a month.

Regardless of positioning, all face the same challenge of persuading billions of

Behind the issue of design lies a deeper question – will people want a single, infinitely malleable personal agent to handle everything they do or will they turn to more specialised agents, many of them embedded in different applications? For now, many companies are hedging their bets.

Walmart has its own shopping agent, called Sparky, but has also allied itself with Meta to make it easier for Muse users to browse its site. Amazon, by contrast, blocks agents from Anthropic, OpenAI and Meta – at least for now.

A world of specialists or one agent to rule them all? The latter would confer huge power on the companies involved, particularly if it led to the sort of market concentration already seen in markets for search, social networking and ecommerce.

But any company aspiring to that first has to find the right formula to cause billions of people to transform their digital behaviour.

richard.waters@ft.com

Legal Notices

IN THE MATTER OF IRISH CONTINENTAL GROUP, PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2014 AND IN THE MATTER OF A PROPOSAL FOR A SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT PURSUANT TO PART 9, CHAPTER 1 OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2014 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE IRISH TAKEOVER PANEL ACT 1997

NOTICE

NOTICE is hereby given pursuant to Section 453(2)(b) of the Irish Companies Act 2014 (the Act) that resolutions were passed, approving a scheme of arrangement (the Scheme) proposed pursuant to Part 9, Chapter 1 of the Act, at the meetings of shareholders, convened by the Independent Directors, of Irish Continental Group, public limited company (company number 41043) (the Company) held on 10 September 2026. The purpose of the Scheme is to effect the acquisition of the entire issued share capital of the Company by Bluefin BidCo Limited.

NOTICE is further given that the Company will make an application to the High Court of Ireland pursuant to Section 453(2)(c) of the Act for an order sanctioning the Scheme.

This application will be brought before the High Court of Ireland by way of a single originating notice of motion which will be heard in the Commercial List of the High Court of Ireland at 11.00am (GMT) on 10 November 2026. Information on the hearing (or, if relevant, a change in the date of the hearing) will be advertised on the Company's website www.lcg.ie. By Order of the High Court of Ireland, any interested party intending to appear at the hearing must give notice of their intention to do so to the Company's solicitors, A&L Goodbody LLP, by email addressed to Hannah Shaw at hshaw@algoodbody.com no later than 5.30pm (GMT) on Friday, 23 October 2026. Any affidavit evidence that an interested party intends to rely on at the hearing shall be filed with the Central Office of the High Court of Ireland. The Company's solicitors, A&L Goodbody LLP, by that time and date (i.e., 5.30pm (GMT) on Friday, 23 October 2026), is also referred to the Company's solicitors, A&L Goodbody LLP, by the email addressed to Hannah Shaw at hshaw@algoodbody.com.

Dated: 9 October 2026
Signed: A&L Goodbody LLP
Solicitors for Irish Continental Group, public limited company
25 North Wall Quay
Dublin 1
Ireland

Notice to Advertisers

Calls to the Financial Times Advertising Department may be monitored.

Acceptance of any advertisement for publication will be subject to the then current terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications.

A copy of the terms and conditions of insertion of advertisements in FT publications can be obtained from

CIVAP LTD.- Registration No. 338011 OVERBYE LTD.- Registration No. 311045 ARCADELTD.- Registration No. 325003 (Each in Voluntary Liquidation) (together, the "Companies") NOTICE REVOLUNTARY/WINDING UP (together, the "Companies") NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY WINDING UP

TAKE NOTICE that each of the Companies was placed into voluntary liquidation on 28 July 2026 by special resolution passed by written resolution of the respective voting shareholder of each of the Companies. AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that R&H Restructuring VL Services Ltd. of Windward I, Regatta Office Park, PO Box 897, Grand Cayman KYI-1103, Cayman Islands was appointed voluntary liquidator of each of the Companies. AND NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the share of the

+44 (0)20 7873 3000, or viewed at www.FT.com/advertising

AND NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that creditors of any of the Companies are required to prove their debts or claims within 21 days of the publication of this notice by sending their names, addresses and particulars of their debts or claims to the undersigned. In default thereof, they may be excluded from the benefit of any distribution made before such debts and/or claims are proved or from objecting to the distribution. Dated: 05 October 2026

Authorised signatories for and on behalf of R&H Restructuring VL Services, Ltd., Voluntary Liquidator Contact for Enquiries: Allanah Murphy. Email: amurphy@rhrestructuring.com

Imagine your advert here

Business for Sale, Business Opportunities, Business Services, Business Wanted, Legal Notices, Company Notices, Public Notices, Floating Rates Notes, Shareholder Messages, Property For Sale, Tender Notices

Classified Business Advertising Tel: +44 20 7873 4000 | Email: advertising@ft.com

COMPANIES & MARKETS

Technology

Samsung profit soars to record \$80bn

Chipmaker's guidance shows nearly ninefold rise amid booming AI demand

SONG JUNG-A — SEOUL

Samsung Electronics has estimated its operating profit surged nearly ninefold in the third quarter as strong demand for memory chips from AI companies continues to drive industry-wide shortages.

The world's largest memory-chip maker projected record operating profit of Won107.4tn (\$80.2bn) in the July to September period.

That compared with Won12.2tn in the same period last year and was above expectations of Won106tn as compiled by LSEG SmartEstimate. Sales were estimated at Won195tn, up 126.6 per cent year on year.

Samsung issues expected profit and sales figures ahead of releasing its full quarterly results. The upbeat guidance represents a fourth consecutive quarter of record performance and highlights a prolonged shortage of memory chips as AI companies swoop up supplies and drive up prices.

Samsung said it became the world's first tech company to report more than Won100tn in quarterly operating profit.

High demand for memory chips – a crucial component in the data centres that power AI – has led to record profits and share prices for chipmakers such as Samsung. Its stock has more than doubled this year, valuing it at about \$1.3tn.

The demand has also put pressure on other buyers of memory chips, including makers of smartphones and computers, which have had to grapple with higher prices.

Contract prices for conventional dynamic random-access memory chips, which store short-term memory on devices, are expected to rise by 10 to 15 per cent in the fourth quarter, according to market researcher TrendForce.

Analysts expect the chip squeeze to persist into next year, with margins protected by an increasing proportion of long-term supply contracts with AI companies. US chipmaker Micron said last week the industry could see a tighter market over the next two years.

"We expect memory supply to be tighter next year than this year," said

Kim Young-geon, an analyst at Mirae Asset Securities. "New long-term contracts are being signed at prices higher than those of existing contracts."

Han Dong-hee, an analyst at SK Securities, said the rise of long-term deals had reduced the industry's past boom-and-bust nature as well as price volatility.

“Even if the peak in earnings can be somewhat lower, the period during which earnings remain at a high level will be much longer, maximising cumulative cash generation,” he said in a recent report.

In the most cutting-edge AI hardware, Samsung recently gained ground in developing advanced HBM4 chips after years of struggling to narrow its gap with rival SK Hynix.

However, some investors question longer-term demand for chips amid concerns about AI's existential risks. Some US tech companies have called for a slowdown in AI development.

In a sign of investor worries, Samsung shares fell 2.4 per cent yesterday despite the record profit. They are down more than a quarter from their June peak.

“Investors are looking beyond the company’s quarterly figures and waiting for clearer signals that the upcycle can continue next year and the year after next,” said Albert Yong, managing partner at Seoul-based Petra Capital Management.

"They care more about when the industry will peak out and whether it will repeat the severe boom and bust cycle of the past," Yong added.

Sport. Legal moves

LIV Golf accelerates negotiations with players

Backers hope to revive series by offering equity settlement for their existing claims

SUJEET INDAP — NEW YORK

Lawyers representing golf star Bryson DeChambeau are seeking to organise an alliance of players to negotiate terms with the successor to the bankrupt LIV Golf league on joining a new tour.

A mooted “steering” committee of players, represented by the firm Weil, Gotshal and Manges, could press player demands in court and with LIV and BC Partners, two counterparties in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. This would be separate from an official creditors committee.

DeChambeau's interest in the potential new team format comes as lawyers for LIV's other marquee star, Jon Rahm, told a federal bankruptcy court in New Jersey on Wednesday that Rahm would not be signing up. Rahm's lawyer further said the Spaniard was in “advanced discussions on a consensual separation agreement” with the existing LIV.

The FT has reported that the bulk of the roughly \$400mn in outstanding payments to golfers from LIV is owed to DeChambeau and Rahm.

An agreement struck this week between LIV, its previous backer, the Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia, and private capital sponsor BC Partners, includes a \$4mn contribution to an existing \$50mn bankruptcy loan extended by PIF, with the asset management firm's money funding the launch of "LIV 2.0".

PIF has told the court that it will shift the bankruptcy case to a “wind-down” should the new plan not come together by the end of this month, leaving BC in a race to bring in a critical mass of players.

BC said it was willing to lead a total \$300mn investment to launch LIV 2.0 but PIF insisted the investor inject money immediately to show its seriousness about forming the new league, the FT has reported.

The settlement between BC and PIF has freed the private capital firm to make its pitch to players, as it requires the investor to have agreements with a “requisite” number of players by October 25.

"The ball is literally in the court of BC and the company," said a person close to PIF, who noted that no player had publicly committed to LIV 2.0 and that it was now up to the private capital firm to share a fully formed business plan.

A separate committee of unsecured

Fore: Bryson DeChambeau playing at a LIV Golf event in England this year. Below, lawyers for Jon Rahm told a court this week that he would not be joining a successor tour Jason Butler/Getty Images; Michael Miller/ISI Photo/Getty Images

creditors has been formed with just a single golfer, Michael La Sasso, among its seven members. The other committee members are largely trade vendors who provided services to LIV Golf and its tournaments and are owed payment.

Advisers to the committee include law firm Willkie, Farr & Gallagher and consultant group Berkeley Research Group. LIV may owe more than \$100mn in total to the trade creditors, according to a person familiar with the situation.

Ted Goldthorpe, an executive at BC Partners, told a conference in London sponsored by trade publication Sportico that team franchises in LIV 2.0 could eventually be worth \$100mn or more.

The preliminary terms for the revived LIV call for players to own a majority of the equity in the new league as a settlement for their existing claims against LIV. Players who choose to play in the new league can then gain extra payouts.

"You can point to David Beckham in Miami or Magic Johnson and the Lakers. There are many examples. These guys get to have their cake and eat it too," Goldthorpe said.

“They can create real wealth at the team level and the holding company level, and they still play for prize money and make good money. To the extent we can make the league sustainable, they will create real wealth on these teams,” he added.

‘They can create real wealth at the team level . . . and they still play for prize money and make good money’

LIV 2.0 is expected to rehire staff and has assembled a preliminary tournament schedule, according to a person familiar with its plans.

Large family offices have expressed interest in participating in the contemplated \$300mn financing, the person said. The BC discussions are taking place directly with players as well as agents and the businesspeople who run the current LIV team franchises.

The unsecured creditor committee is largely looking out for trade vendors whose interests may diverge from players, that gap leading some law firms to market the idea of a players-only advocacy group.

Besides economic terms, players considering LIV 2.0 have expressed concern that rival leagues such as the US PGA Tour and Europe's DP World Tour may not allow them to shuttle between circuits during a season.

Weil, Gotshal is one of the most prominent firms in US corporate restructuring, most recently representing autoparts maker First Brands in its Chapter 11 case.

Multiple parties have had their respective legal counsel register an appearance with the bankruptcy court. One law firm, Reed Smith, is representing five players and may also angle to form a committee.

LIV recently agreed to a request from golfer Sergio Garcia to allow him to formally terminate his player agreement with the league, even as the league had already sought to void such contracts as a part of the bankruptcy.

Garcia's lawyers told the court they needed a formal termination, in addition to the voided agreement through the court process, to be able to enter into new endorsements and join another league – LIV 2.0 or otherwise.

In the court hearing on Wednesday, lawyers for multiple golfers said they also wanted formal termination. It was unclear if Garcia or any of the other players seeking termination remain interested in LIV 2.0.

The OCR result should be empty, as the source image contains only a stylistic horizontal line that must be ignored according to Rule 2. No text or placeholder characters should be output.

Retail

Uniqlo owner set to overtake H&M as US and European sales surge

HARRY DEMPSEY — TOKYO

Annual sales at the Japanese owner of clothing store Uniqlo are set to eclipse Sweden's H&M for the first time following a worldwide sales boom.

Fast Retailing, which owns the stores known globally for their fleeces, socks and thermals, said annual revenue rose 16.6 per cent to ¥3.96tn (\$25bn) in the year to August 31 as it unveiled a big increase to the dividend. That compares with analysts' estimates of Skr222bn (\$22.2bn) in revenue for H&M's full year, ending next month.

Fast Retailing has ambitions to overtake Zara's owner Inditex to become the world's top mass-market casual fashion retailer. "Our pursuit of becoming number one enters a new stage," founder Tadashi Yanai said yesterday.

Surpassing H&M would be a landmark moment for Uniqlo, whose focus on well-designed essentials has helped it outperform other fast-fashion brands as consumers gravitate towards minimalist styles.

Daisuke Tsukagoshi, president of Uniqlo, said one “key” to expanding sales would be strengthening its offerings of “seasonless” clothing as climate change drives more extreme and unpredictable weather. “We used to structure our product range around the four seasons,” he said. “But now the boundaries between seasons are changing.”

Founded in 1984, Uniqlo is a rare example of a Japanese brand that took its business model global after the country's asset bubble burst. The chain manufactures a range of simple and affordable clothing and underwear using advanced fabrics at huge scale, mainly sold at bricks-and-mortar stores.

Fast Retailing benchmarks itself against other mainstream casual fashion retailers that control everything from design to sales.

Under that ranking – which excludes ecommerce platform Shein, discounter TJ Maxx, sports brands and luxury houses – Uniqlo is poised to leap over H&M into second place.

“Overtaking H&M in revenues has long been an ambition of Fast Retailing’s leadership,” said Achim Berg, founder of retail sector think-tank FashionSights. “This milestone demonstrates both the strength of Uniqlo’s business model and the current weakness of H&M’s.”

However, Fast Retailing still had "some way to go to fulfil Yanai's ambition of becoming the world's largest fashion retailer", Berg cautioned.

H&M is not the only fast-fashion retailer to struggle. Shein, which sells cheap China-made clothes directly to consumers in the west, said fallout from the Iran war and new import duties had hit its second-quarter profits.

Fast Retailing's annual sales have grown by double digits on average over the past 15 years. This year, it posted the biggest rise since 2023 as new store openings and a pipeline of hit products propelled sales.

That helped to underpin a fifth year of record net profit, at ¥542bn (\$3.4bn), beating its estimate of ¥500bn and up a quarter over the previous year.

The company increased its dividend estimate for the 2026 financial year by a third to ¥850 a share. It expects the strong performance to continue, with revenue growing 12 per cent to ¥4.45tn and forecast net profit of ¥560bn for the next financial year.

Revenue outside Japan has risen more than a quarter this year, as Uniqlo starts to enter smaller cities in Europe and shopping malls in the US.

EasyJet cuts more winter flights as costs rise

PETER CAMPBELL AND IAN JOHNSTON BRUSSELS

EasyJet will cut another 700,000 seats from its winter flight schedule to save on fuel, as the low-cost airline steps up efforts to curb costs during the industry's lean season.

Chief executive Kenton Jarvis said the company was scaling back capacity over the quieter months to prevent it paying higher sums for fuel, which has rocketed in price since the Iran conflict in February.

Earlier in the summer easyJet cut about 700,000 seats from its winter flights. Jarvis said the airline would now remove between 600,000 and 700,000 more – the equivalent of about two days' worth of flying.

The budget carrier, one of Europe's biggest airlines, typically offers about 50mn seats on flights over the winter season, which runs from October to the end of March.

“People are taking capacity out, we see that across all competitors,” he told the FT, adding that was “no surprise” given fuel costs. “I honestly think it’s been quite a surprise for the industry

'I honestly think it's been quite a surprise for the industry that fuel has stayed as high as it is'

that fuel has stayed as high as it is."

Jet fuel costs roughly doubled after the start of the Iran conflict, which led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Though prices have started to fall, they remain far higher than airlines expected when the conflict began, Jarvis added.

European airlines hedge some of their fuel exposure, but have been left paying higher prices for the remainder, Jarvis said. By cutting capacity, easyJet could reduce its use of more expensive fuel, he added.

His comments come after Ryanair last week said it was cancelling some flights to save money over winter.

Boss Michael O'Leary said yesterday that he expected higher fuel costs to continue for another 18 months. "We are all facing an enormous cost challenge next year," he said.

Global industry group Iata has already warned that rising fuel costs will cost the sector an extra \$100bn this year. Several carriers have fallen into bankruptcy since the conflict started, including Spirit in the US.

O'Leary, Jarvis and other bosses have warned that higher costs come as airlines also face an additional burden from environmental rules.

EY revenue growth outpaces rival Deloitte's

STEPHEN FOLEY — NEW YORK

EY's global revenue growth accelerated in the past year as the Big Four firm tried to muscle in on rival Deloitte's territory as a big outsourcing provider to companies around the world.

The firm also benefited from strong merger and acquisition activity that boosted its deal advisory business, helping push EY's global revenues up 4.7 per cent to \$57bn in the year to June 30.

That compared with 4 per cent in the previous 12 months and outpaced Deloitte's most recent annual growth rate of 3.8 per cent, stripping out currency fluctuations.

PwC and KPMG, the other two Big Four accounting and consulting firms, are yet to report revenues.

Raj Sharma, EY global managing partner for growth and innovation, said the results reflected a reorganisation of the

415,000-person firm that included focusing on so-called managed services, which can take over back-office, tax, finance and IT functions for clients.

While EY's headcount rose just 2 per cent overall last year, after it cut jobs in the Americas, there was a 12 per cent increase at the global service centres, including those building technology for use across the firm.

While Deloitte is the leader among the Big Four in such outsourced services, EY said its own managed services business grew 13 per cent over the past year to about \$7bn. Most of the services are sold to tax clients but it also reported 20 per cent growth in managed services in its consulting business, which included IT services such as cyber security.

"The outcome in managed services is the aggregation of all these things coming to life in the last six or seven months," Sharma said.

EY Parthenon, which sells strategy and deal advice, was the fastest-growing part of EY in the past year, with revenues of \$6.8bn, up 7.4 per cent in constant currency terms. The largest business, audit, was the slowest growing, up 3 per cent to \$18.9bn. Tax grew 6 per cent to \$13.8bn.

The firm said that helping clients implement AI helped drive growth in its consulting business, which increased revenue by 4.4 per cent to \$17.4bn. Although that was slower than the previous year, the business did not decelerate as sharply as Deloitte's consulting arm. Deloitte reported last month.

The Big Four, which are structured as networks of locally owned private partnerships, do not publish global profit figures, but Sharma said EY expanded profitability in the year to June.

"All our member firms have done well in that area," he said.

COMPANIES & MARKETS

BMW doubles down on German production as rivals cut capacity

Carmaker invests €2bn in Bavarian plants amid little Chinese competition in its premium segment

OLAF STORBECK — MUNICH

Hemmed in by residential neighbourhoods in one of Germany's most expensive cities, a century-old factory in central Munich has become BMW's production hub for its next generation of cars.

BMW's main plant across the road from its corporate headquarters houses 6,000 workers who build the new all-electric version of the 3 Series. The German carmaker has sold more than 18mn units of the model since its launch in 1975, while production of the eighth generation started in August.

"This is where we build the cars of the future," plant chief Peter Weber told the FT during a factory tour.

The Munich overhaul is at the heart of a high-stakes bet by BMW on the future of manufacturing in Germany. While Volkswagen and Mercedes are cutting capacity at home amid high labour and energy costs, BMW is trying to decouple from the decline of German industry, which has been shedding as many as 15,000 jobs a month.

"We definitely see a future for Germany as a manufacturing location," said the group's head of production, Raymond Wittmann.

The factory, which started production with aircraft engines and motorbikes in 1922, has been rebuilt over the past five years. Manufacturing extends across three floors connected by lifts, with self-driving robots delivering parts straight to the assembly line.

BMW has invested about €2bn in its 3 Series production sites in Munich and Dingolfing and a new battery plant some 135km north-east of Munich. “That’s a very clear commitment to the location where we are based and where we are at home,” said Wittmann.

While the group also spent about €2bn on a new plant in Debrecen in Hungary and is axing more than 8,000 back-office jobs, blue-collar workers are excluded from the cuts.

Like its rivals, BMW has been hit hard by falling sales in China and US tariffs. Milan Nedeljković, who became chief executive in May, warned in the summer that it would take more than five years for BMW's operating profit margin to return to the longstanding range of 8 to 10 per cent. This year, the group is bracing itself for just 1 to 3 per cent.

But BMW's domestic production has held up better than that of its German rivals. One in four vehicles made in Germany last year was a BMW, with production of 1.07mn cars, just shy of the number manufactured in 2024.

While German car production fell 10 per cent in 2025 from pre-pandemic levels, BMW saw a 6 per cent increase, helped by its decision to bring production of the Mini Countryman, the X1 and some 5 Series models in-house from partners in the Netherlands and Austria.

“Over the past few years, [BMW] has gained market share and consistently had better plant utilisation in Germany than Mercedes or Volkswagen,” said Patrick Hummel, head of European autos research at UBS.

As a premium brand, BMW faces less competition from new Chinese rivals in its home market for now. Compared with mass-market rivals, premium car-makers are eking out higher profit per vehicle, usually leading to higher margins, which helps them to accommodate German labour costs.

"There is a different [corporate and managerial] culture at BMW," Horst Ott, boss of trade union IG Metall in Bavaria and a BMW supervisory board member, told the FT. BMW's leadership was not just "thinking from one

Production of BMW's i3 at its Munich plant. Below, the factory made motorbikes and aircraft engines when it started operations in 1922 Fabian Kirchbauer, Alamy

quarterly number of [earnings before interest and tax] to the next", but took a longer-term perspective, he noted.

The group's current position owes much to decisions taken years ago, including producing a higher share of its vehicles sold in China and the US locally. As a consequence, German factories are less affected by falling sales in Asia and the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs.

BMW also embraced electric cars earlier than its German rivals, launching the first i3 in 2013. The model was a commercial flop but taught BMW important lessons about the risks of dedicated EV production.

The carmaker has been supported by firm underlying demand, which Hummel describes as “extremely strong”.

Helena Beron Wisbert, professor of automotive economics at Ostfalia Hochschule Wolfsburg, attributes this to a

[BMW] has gained market share and consistently had better plant utilisation in Germany than Mercedes or VW'

Sources: VDAI; BMW; FT calculations

“relatively new” vehicle line-up and “state of the art technology” for electric vehicles.

The all-electric iX3 SUV, built in Hungary and the first model based on BMW's "Neue Klasse" software-controlled platform, has attracted more than 100,000 orders since its launch a year ago, leaving buyers facing waits of up to a year.

“We’re ramping up production as fast as we can,” said Wittmann. Last month, BMW added a night shift to its Debrecen plant, with three shifts producing vehicles 24 hours a day. “The electric 3 Series could be as much of a blockbuster product as the iX3,” said Hummel.

Yet the carmaker cannot escape the challenging economics of producing in Germany. “From a hard-nosed economic perspective, there is little reason to invest in new plants in Germany,” said Moritz Kronenberger, fund manager at Union Investment, pointing to high labour and energy costs. “The money would probably be better invested elsewhere.”

Weber, the BMW plant boss, said that despite the Munich plant's history and proximity to headquarters, “we don't enjoy any special status”. His plant has to be “just as competitive as every other production site”, he stressed.

Production costs per vehicle have come down by 10 per cent following the plant's modernisation and the “Neue Klasse” platform. The new system is digitised and simplified, and the number of parts delivered “just in time” has increased from 45 per cent to 68 per cent, reducing storage costs.

While labour costs per hour in Germany are about three times higher than in Hungary, the gap in overall production costs is much smaller, according to Wittmann.

“Taking everything together, there are not big differences,” he said. Material costs for an EV amount to €20,000-€25,000, while labour costs stand at €1,500-€2,000. German plants also benefit from their proximity to key suppliers, keeping logistics costs low.

Yet even inside BMW there are concerns that the economics could shift against its German plants. A person familiar with the thinking of a supervisory board member said the board member was “very, very worried” about Chinese competitors with newer technology and lower costs, and feared that further job cuts might become necessary in the future.

Wittmann said the competitiveness of German plants may deteriorate “over the medium to long term” if the supplier network shifted towards eastern Europe and more parts were sourced locally. Lower logistics costs “could shift the balance further” towards production in eastern Europe, he said. “That is why it is important that labour costs, energy costs and the overall system in Germany continue to be optimised.”

Basic resources

Arms sector warns of risks in US metals stockpile plan

CAMILLA HODGSON — LONDON

Defence contractors have warned that a US initiative to stockpile critical minerals could drive up prices and unduly compete with industrial buyers for scarce materials.

The US government should “proceed with caution” to avoid distorting markets, the Aerospace Industries Association said in a report of its members’ views released yesterday.

The US Export-Import Bank this year unveiled a \$12bn plan, Project Vault, to build up a strategic domestic reserve of metals for civilian industries to draw on in times of shortage.

That comes in the context of an accelerating international race for resources and a trade war between the US and China that led Beijing to restrict access to a range of metals that are vital for modern technologies.

Members of the AIA were concerned about Project Vault “competing” with corporate buyers for critical minerals “amid an already constrained global supply, which could result in increased market prices and volatility for companies,” the industry body said.

The group, which counts Palantir Technologies and BAE Systems among its members, said it wanted Vault to address its concerns before it made any purchases and to better explain how the initiative would work.

Ex-Im Bank defended the project's work. "Project Vault is a shock absorber for American manufacturers," it said in

‘[The AIA says that Vault] could result in increased market prices and volatility for companies’

a statement. “Project Vault was built to protect American production lines from supply shocks, not compete with the companies it serves.”

The Pentagon declined to comment.

Metals including tungsten, prized for its hardness, and rare earth elements, which go into magnets, are key to defence supply chains. But prices have soared over the past two years as supplies have been squeezed by Beijing, which dominates their production.

The US and other nations are racing to stand up alternative sources and build stockpiles, efforts that could increase rivalry between countries and sectors.

Spain's Abenojar Tungsten told the FT it sold all the metal its mine will produce over its first decade of operations to trading house Traxys, which will supply Project Vault among other clients.

The AIA also warned its members would need more time to comply with a January 1 US deadline banning defence groups from sourcing rare earth magnets from China for the military.

The high-tech components go into everything from electric vehicles to fighter jets and weapons systems, and only a handful of companies outside China manufacture them at scale.

Waivers for non-compliant items would be “necessary beyond January 1” with the volume needed for the sector likely to be “significant”, said the AIA.

That would create an “administrative bottleneck” for the government unless a clear process was set up to deal with waiver applications, the group said.

"It would be very difficult for the industry to bear not having any waivers at all and I dare say it would be impossible," said Dak Hardwick, vice-president of international affairs at the AIA.

President Donald Trump issued an executive order in July restricting the issuance of future waivers.

Next generation search AI upends Singapore's ‘quant Olympics’ and allows more people to compete

OWEN WALKER — SINGAPORE

Artificial intelligence will make hedge fund managers less collaborative and more competitive – if this year's “quant Olympics” are anything to go by.

The annual event, officially called the International Quant Championship, took place in Singapore this week and offered a real-time insight into how the hedge fund industry is being upended by AI.

Quant - short for quantitative - hedge funds use algorithms to exploit patterns in financial markets. They have been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the rise of AI, recording huge gains from gyrations in global government bonds.

Students from 13 countries competed for a \$100,000 cash prize pool and the chance to work in a sector experiencing “radical transformation”, said Igor

Tulchinsky, chief executive of World-Quant, which organises the event.

The quant sector is at an “inflection point”, he said. “Some firms are using the new technologies to make crazy amounts of money. Once you try AI, you never turn back because the improvements are so significant.”

At the glitzy event on Singapore's resort island of Sentosa, finalists paraded on stage waving their national flags, while former athletes gave pep talks about thriving under adversity.

The quant sector is hugely competitive, drawing graduates from engineering, physics and mathematics backgrounds.

The championships were launched in 2018 to help identify the future stars and provide a platform for talented individuals from outside the traditional hedge fund breeding grounds of elite western universities.

This year more than 156,000 students from around the world entered — almost double last year's total. The surge in applicants is partly due to AI, organisers said, as the tools were freely available and allowed more people to take part.

The applicants were whittled down to 13 finalists by pitting trading programs they devised against one another using real-life data.

After the formalities on Tuesday morning, the finalists — a mix of individuals and teams — were given a maths problem. Over four hours, the competitors huddled around their laptops in a function room at the Sentosa venue and put their algorithms through their paces trying to solve it.

On Wednesday, each finalist presented their results to the judges and their fellow competitors, with Victor

Ayebameru from Nigeria taking the crown.

The number of solo entries increased more than 75,000 this year, while there were just 1,000 additional teams. Organisers said this was another consequence of increased use of AI as individual applicants were able to carry out the same work that it previously took whole research teams to conduct.

Nigerian Victor Ayebameru at the International Quant Championship

"It now takes me less than an hour to code what it used to take me a week or even a month to do," said Sean Jean Moey, a computer science student at the National University of Singapore, who made the final cut.

Singapore has long prided itself on its ability to churn out maths whizz-kids. Lee Hsien Loong, the former prime minister and son of Singapore's modern founder Lee Kuan Yew, is well known for coming top of his maths class at Cambridge university.

Proponents of AI have said the tools have helped lower the financial and technical barriers to entry for the quant sector, allowing people from a wider range of backgrounds to take part.

This trend was evident at the championships, where 28 per cent of applicants were from Africa – up from 4 per cent in

2023 – and 26 per cent were women, up from 18 per cent last year.

“We are seeing how AI tools have helped to lower the technical barrier, which could unleash a wave of genuinely novel approaches from researchers,” said Nitish Maini, chief strategy officer at WorldQuant.

However, the biggest immediate disruption AI has brought to the quant sector for many of the would-be fund managers in Singapore this week is the pressure it is putting on landing their first job.

"This has always been a competitive industry, but lots of managers now think if they have access to AI they don't need to hire people for junior positions," said Bailey Liu, an information and computer engineering student at Cambridge university. "But AI should improve human workers, not replace them."

UK COMPANIES

(No text to output)

Financial services

Deloitte fined £6mn for audit failures

Accounting watchdog finds 'pattern' of problems in work at rail operator

ELLESHEVA KISSIN — LONDON

The UK accounting regulator has fined Deloitte £6mn for “a highly concerning pattern of failure” in its audits of rail and transport operator Go-Ahead across five years.

The Financial Reporting Council said yesterday that it would fine the Big Four firm for breaching audit requirements in its work at three subsidiaries of Go-Ahead between 2016 and 2020.

The fine was reduced from £11mn because of Deloitte's "exceptional co-operation", the regulator said.

The watchdog launched the probe four years ago following a crisis at Go-Ahead, which the government stripped of the Southeastern rail franchise in 2021 after finding it had failed to declare tens of millions of pounds of taxpayer funds that should have been returned.

Instead, the FRC found that Go-Ahead kept the money and began releasing it as profit. The practice stopped only when the overpayments were discovered by the government, which eventually fined the company £23.5mn.

In all, Go-Ahead retained more than £30mn in overpayments between its 2016 and 2020 financial years, including £8mn recorded as profit while Deloitte was auditor.

The FRC said Deloitte did not challenge the wrongful retention of public money.

Deloitte's working papers did not discuss the risk of fraud around the overpayments despite a significant internal warning on the matter, the FRC found.

Separately, the watchdog said one member of Deloitte's team emailed the lead partner on the audit in 2019 warning that Go-Ahead's management did not want to "draw attention" to the overpayments.

The same partner reviewed a paper that said a change to the accounts was intended to “hide” those overpayments.

The partner “failed to appreciate that this was a deliberate attempt . . . to conceal” the issue and signed off the accounts, the FRC said.

The watchdog did not take action against the partner because of “exceptional personal circumstances”.

The regulator also found problems at two other Go-Ahead subsidiaries.

At the London and Birmingham Railway, the company “attempted to conceal” £5.6mn of sums it owed to the Department for Transport, the FRC said. And at German subsidiary Gaby, Deloitte applied “insufficient scrutiny” to onerous contract provisions, the regulator said.

Go-Ahead has since been taken private and delisted. It has largely pulled back from UK rail but in 2024 was awarded a joint contract to run the Elizabeth line in London.

The regulator has three outstanding investigations into Deloitte, whose UK-based partners were paid a record of £1.13mn last year, on average.

Deloitte UK said: “We regret that aspects of our audit work did not meet the standards expected and have learnt from this matter. We are committed to continuous improvement and the delivery of high-quality audits.”

Go-Ahead said the FRC's investigation related to “a historic issue” and “has learnt from that incident and has transformed significantly since then”.

Aerospace & defence. Military sovereignty

SkyNet satellite battle tests pledge to 'buy British'

Decision looms on contract worth up to £2bn as Airbus competes against Lockheed

SYLVIA PFEIFER — LONDON

A battle between two of the world's leading aerospace and defence groups to build the next generation of satellites for the British armed forces has become an early test of Labour's stance on military sovereignty.

The contract for the new SkyNet satellites, estimated to be worth up to £2bn, has pitted European aerospace group Airbus, which has overseen SkyNet for decades, against a rival bid from Lockheed Martin of the US.

Ministers who have pledged to “buy British” are being lobbied to stick with the European company, whose presence has helped make the UK a centre for military satellite communications.

But they must also navigate an increasingly unpredictable relationship with President Donald Trump's administration in Washington.

The FT reported this year that officials had questioned whether the UK should be entrusting such a key military capability to a US company.

The decision on SkyNet will be one of the first big-spending choices taken by Wes Streeting, appointed defence secretary by Prime Minister Andy Burnham in July, at a time when the UK has promised to bolster its military capabilities.

It comes as the war in Ukraine has underlined European nations' reliance on space-based communications, with Kyiv leaning heavily on satellites to provide intelligence to repel Russia's army.

Douglas Barrie, senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies think-tank, said the government would face criticism either way. "Go with the US and your defence industrial policy looks like it's getting off on the wrong foot. Go with the incumbent Airbus and you need to minimise any blowback from the White House," he added.

SkyNet is the UK's military satellite communications system that has been in operation since the 1960s. The Ministry of Defence is upgrading the network through its SkyNet 6 programme with the contract worth up to £2bn covering two geostationary satellites that will provide secure communications into the 2040s and beyond.

Final frontier: the UK's SkyNet military satellite system that Airbus hopes will be upgraded at its Stevenage site, below Airbus/Cover Images/Reuters Connect; Amazing Aerial/Alamy Stock Photo

Final offers submitted late last year are due to expire in the middle of November, according to two people familiar with the situation, and a decision is due in the next few weeks.

Airbus's work designing and building satellites helps to support about 2,500 jobs at its sites in Stevenage and Portsmouth and a further 18,000 in the wider supply chain. Some 650 Airbus employees work directly on SkyNet.

Supporters of Airbus, which has been involved in SkyNet since 1974, have urged the UK to award the contract to the European group.

Sharon Graham, general secretary of the Unite union, said the government needed to “ensure that it makes good on its promise to invest in British industry and buy British in defence”.

Kevin Bonavia, Labour MP for Stevenage, said SkyNet 6 was vital to retaining “the skills, expertise, supply chains and freedom of action that underpin a genuinely sovereign UK space capability”.

Failure to win the contract could also put up to £10bn worth of potential Airbus exports at risk, according to people familiar with the situation. The bidding is being fought against the backdrop of wider European consolidation in space.

Airbus is in talks with France's Thales and Leonardo of Italy to create a pan-European space champion capable of taking on Elon Musk's SpaceX as well as rivals from China and Russia. The companies are discussing where to locate different centres of excellence.

People close to Airbus fear the UK could lose its position as a centre of military satellite communications if the company does not secure the SkyNet contract. "If you're not a space power, you're not in that conversation," said an executive close to Airbus.

Lockheed has said it would build a new manufacturing facility in northeast England if its bid wins and promised to create a “national space ecosystem” in the UK, with about 2,000 jobs, of which over 400 would be direct.

The US defence giant has also said it would use the UK as an export hub for future space programmes, with about \$15bn in potential export opportunities identified. Industry experts said the potential for close integration with the US military's significant space capabilities should not be discounted.

There were 'concerns over whether the US is a trusted partner'

Critics, however, have questioned how “sovereign” Lockheed’s factory would be, suggesting the company would rely on US intellectual property.

Lockheed has stressed that the "design authority" for its technology – the company or organisation that creates and can modify a particular weapon – would reside in the UK.

Several defence industry executives at last week's Labour Party conference in Liverpool said there was still a lack of clarity around what constituted “being British” in procurement decisions.

Airbus and Lockheed both declined to comment.

Francis Tusa, editor of Defence Analysis, said the SkyNet contract should be awarded to Airbus, arguing there were “strategic implications” to consider at a time when there were “concerns over whether the US is a trusted partner”.

The Ministry of Defence said both bidders were “subject to full evaluation of their proposals and must offer satellites that are assembled, integrated and tested in the UK”.

The “design authority must be based in the UK and a range of critical components must be provided from UK sources”, it added.

Retail

Tesco predicts less boozy Christmas amid trend for healthy choices

LAURA ONITA

Tesco chief executive Ken Murphy has raised the prospect of a less boozy Christmas due to shoppers making healthier choices as the UK's largest supermarket chain lifted its full-year profit outlook.

"I do think it could be a marginally healthier Christmas," Murphy told reporters yesterday. "We think low- and no-alcohol will see strong growth," he added, although shoppers typically "do love to indulge" during the festive season.

Murphy said that customers were increasingly choosing healthier meals and eating smaller portion sizes with more protein and fibre, as well as opting for healthier desserts and low- and no-alcohol drinks.

This was part of a broader shift towards healthier living, he added, rather than simply a consequence of growing numbers of people using weight-loss drugs.

His comments came as the FTSE 100 group said it expected to generate profits of between £3.15bn and £3.3bn in the year to the end of February compared with an April forecast of £3bn to £3.3bn. The company's shares closed up 5.2 per cent yesterday.

Tesco's UK like-for-like sales increased 1.5 per cent in the first half

'It could be a marginally healthier Christmas. We think low- and no-alcohol will see strong growth'

of the year, a sharp slowdown from 4.9 per cent growth in the same period last year.

Group like-for-like sales increased 1 per cent, while total revenue rose 3.7 per cent to £37.3bn. Adjusted operating profit climbed 6.5 per cent to £1.8bn.

Tesco has extended its market lead over rivals by cutting prices and matching Aldi on hundreds of products while also benefiting from the struggles of debt-laden rivals Asda and Morrisons. But it has surrendered some of those gains in recent months.

Murphy said that Tesco expected to have lost some market share over the summer following strong gains the previous year, adding that “wasn’t a surprise” to management.

It still commands 27.8 per cent share of UK food sales, according to data from Worldpanel by Numerator.

Competition has intensified in the UK grocery market this year as consumers have become wary of rising costs because of global issues such as the war in Iran.

But Murphy said that customers had been relatively resilient, adding this partly reflected people dealing with years of external shocks.

“They have, to a certain extent, become used to it, and they deal with it, and they get on with life.”

He said that food inflation was “well below wage inflation” at the half year, helped by strong competition but declined to predict the direction of future prices.

Asked about supermarket consolidation following the aborted deal talks in February between rivals Sainsbury's and Morrisons, Murphy said "we don't dwell too much on that".

Basic resources

London gold market association accused of causing deaths of two miners in Tanzania

DANIEL THOMAS AND CAMILLA HODGSON LONDON

The London Bullion Market Association has been accused of causing the deaths of two miners in Tanzania as it fights for its future as the setter of standards in the world's largest gold market at the start of a High Court case.

The trial began on Wednesday over claims brought against the non-profit members' association by the families of the two miners, who were allegedly killed by security forces in two separate incidents at the mine in 2019.

The case centres on the LBMA's so-called "good delivery list" accreditation, which refiners must have to deliver gold into London vaults.

This requires them to comply with the industry body's responsible sourcing rules, which are designed to prevent gold linked to human rights violations, conflicts or crimes from entering the market.

The case could have far-reaching ramifications for centuries-old standards for metals traded in London – and through it around the world – and for more recent attempts to promote responsible mining and prevent “dirty” gold entering markets. Protesters gathered outside the court on Wednesday.

In their opening arguments, the claimants alleged that the LBMA “devised, trumpeted and implemented a responsible sourcing and certification programme which served as a thick smokescreen”.

They said the LBMA caused the miners' deaths by "enabling the commercial viability of operations accompanied by serious abuses . . . cloaking a problematic supply chain from scrutiny [and] maintaining certifications when suspension or withdrawal would have altered conditions".

They argued that the LBMA was the certifying body that accredited gold from the mine as being responsibly sourced and said it should have followed its procedures and decertified the metal because of alleged human rights abuses.

The LBMA denies liability in full. In its opening arguments on Wednesday, it denied it owed any alleged duty of care.

Lawyers for the group said it was “not responsible in law for either of these deaths and is firmly of the view that these claims should not have been brought against the LBMA”.

It said it does not certify any gold as responsibly sourced but that its certification scheme requires refiners to demonstrate they have due-diligence processes and procedures in place. “LBMA is not an auditor, carries out no audits and did not have access to the relevant confidential due-diligence files of the refiners,” its opening argument said.

The case threatens to open the door to claims against other industry bodies that set standards. The LBMA said it could mean industry certification programmes would be liable for the conduct of organisations they do not control and that this could weaken responsible sourcing programmes across metals, minerals, garments and agriculture.

The High Court case could have far-reaching ramifications for centuries-old standards for gold traded in London and around the world — Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg

Analysts at Peel Hunt said this week that the impact of a win for the claimants “across the whole of mining would be seismic”.

Emily Iona Stewart, head of policy and advocacy at campaign group Global Witness, said the case could be a “watershed moment for voluntary certification schemes”, which “may no longer be able to distance themselves from harm while continuing to provide assurances to companies and customers”.

She added: "Any credible scheme should properly scrutinise the companies and supply chains they certify."

The case arises from incidents in July and December 2019 at the North Mara gold mine, about 20km south of the Kenyan border in Tanzania.

The men were among artisanal miners prospecting for gold in waste rock and slurry storage. They were allegedly killed by police and private security forces called to disperse artisanal miners using tear gas and live ammunition.

The mine is owned and operated by Barrick, one of the world's largest mining companies, while the gold in the case went through an Indian refinery certified by the LBMA.

The LBMA's small size — it had 45 staff as of last year and made a pre-tax loss of £1.6mn in accounts filed last month, leaving reserves at just £1.4mn — belies its importance to the gold trade, with many refiners needing accreditation in order to trade on markets.

The case threatens to wipe out its financial reserves. In its accounts last month, the LBMA said potential costs of £3mn relating to the claimants' legal expenses could be incurred, were it to lose the case. However, it added in the accounts that it did not believe its liability to be provable and would fight in court to clear its name.

The court case comes days after the LBMA's annual gathering in Sorrento, Italy, where chief executive Ruth Crowell said that fees would need to increase "to continue and grow our mandate".

COMPANIES & MARKETS

Commodities. Focus shift

Oil majors look beyond war to Middle East expansion

Groups keen to invest in region with huge potential despite lack of Iran conflict resolution

MALCOLM MOORE AND VERITY RATCLIFFE — LONDON

The world's largest oil companies are looking past the chaos, destruction and lost production caused by the war in the Middle East as they target greater access to the region's vast oil and gas reserves, a prize they have pursued for decades.

Executives from Shell, BP, TotalEnergies, ConocoPhillips and Chevron this week expressed their appetite for investing in the world's most prolific oil-producing region, arguing that its plentiful, low-cost reserves outweighed the heightened risks.

The display of confidence is set to continue this weekend when many of the same executives travel to Riyadh at the invitation of Saudi energy minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman for the World Petroleum Congress, despite security concerns as Iran-backed Houthi rebels pursue a military campaign against the kingdom.

As well as reaffirming their ties to Gulf countries, some executives are cultivating relationships in the hope of grabbing new opportunities thrown up by the war, as Arab governments reassess global relationships and weigh the huge job of rebuilding facilities and investing in new infrastructure after the war has ended.

Patrick Pouyanné, chief executive of France's TotalEnergies, the oil major with the largest Gulf footprint, said he dreamt “more than ever” of putting money into every country in the region, even if his company has to build more pipelines to export crude.

"For us as investors, I strongly believe the Middle East still has the cheapest oil," he said. "We need this oil, but we need to unlock the Strait of Hormuz by developing alternative routes, and we will do it. We'll do it in Abu Dhabi,

in Iraq and in Syria. It's part of our business."

Other executives speaking at the Energy Intelligence Forum in London, struck a similar note.

"I'm partly biased being Middle Eastern," said Wael Sawan, the Lebanese-Canadian head of Shell, "but I fundamentally

believe that high quality assets "stewarded by incredibly capable governments in the Middle East mean those resources will get to the market".

Meg O'Neill, chief executive of BP, said the business, which began as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, had a “history rooted in the Middle East”.

"We're very proud of our long connections to a number of nations. Our hearts go out to the people who have been affected by the conflict. We all hope for a speedy resolution. So we have no intention of shying away," she added.

The biggest prize would be greater access to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which possess some of the world's largest and cheapest-to-produce hydrocarbon reserves.

Both have traditionally kept tight control of their most valuable fields through their national oil companies, limiting foreign participation or offering international companies relatively

modest returns.

The forum was the first public speech by Saudi Aramco chief execu-

public speech by Saudi Aramco chief executive Amin Nasser since the US and Israel went to war with Iran in February, and an opportunity for him to meet leading oil bosses. Musabbeh Al Kaabi, head of

national oil company Adnoc, was also in London for meetings.

"The fact is, the Middle East has 50 per cent of the globe's oil reserves," said Ashraf Al Ghazzawi, Aramco's head of strategy. "We have the largest spare capacity, we have five decades of reserves, we are the lowest-cost producer."

He said: "We have to look beyond the

A TotalEnergies refinery in Germany. The company is one of several that are looking to invest in the Middle East. Below, BP chief executive Meg O'Neill — Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg;

'The fact is, the Middle East has 50% of the globe's oil reserves'

current crisis. Energy is a long-term business. You cannot diversify away from these facts."

However, one executive at the event noted that while Gulf producers talked about their efforts to improve resilience, both Aramco and Adnoc had spent the past few years buying foreign assets. "When you look at what they're doing, they're diversifying more and more from their region," the executive said.

Ryan Lance, executive chair of ConocoPhillips, which has recently partnered with BP in the Kirkuk oilfields in Iraq, noted how the region's governments had begun to recognise that they needed to offer more attractive terms.

“We need a contract that accommodates the risk, the geopolitical risk that we have seen in the area,” he said. “But all that’s starting to come together, both from the international oil company side and the host government side. Iraq and Syria have done that, and others are starting to think about it.”

Referring to previous attempts by the US company to invest in the country, Lance said: "We looked for the last 25 years in Iraq, and it didn't work."

Mike Wirth, chief executive of Chevron, agreed the “economics look better today”, with the US major “months away” from signing a deal for Iraq’s West Qurna oilfield that was previously run by Russia’s Lukoil.

"Iraq is attractive," he said. "The risks are still very real, but returns follow risk." See Lex

Our global team gives you market-moving news and views, 24 hours a day ft.com/markets

Big investors 'bottom fish' in trading after French sell-off

Fixed income

IAN SMITH — LONDON

A sell-off in French government bonds that spread into broader Eurozone markets this month has lured big investors to “bottom fish” among beaten-down assets including Italian bonds and corporate debt, on a bet that contagion fears are overdone.

The wave of selling in French debt pushed the country's benchmark 10-year bond yield to its highest in almost a quarter of a century this month, at almost 5 per cent, as worries grow over the sustainability of the government's €3.5tn debt pile.

France's borrowing cost premium — or spread — over 10-year German Bunds, a key barometer of investor worry, has jumped to 1.4 percentage points, up roughly two-thirds from the start of the month.

Other Eurozone spreads have also widened, as concern deepened over the potential fallout from a French debt crunch, with Italy's climbing to more than 1.1 percentage points.

Several big asset managers said they had pounced on broader debt that had been caught up in the sell-off, on a view

'European government bond markets today benefit from stronger institutional backing'

that the region was unlikely to be heading for an economic blow-up similar to the Eurozone debt crisis more than a decade ago.

“This isn’t a repeat of the early 2010s,” said Aberdeen Investments fund manager Alex Everett. “Despite recent volatility, the European government bond market today benefits from materially stronger institutional backing and market confidence.”

The manager has made fresh bets on Italian bonds outperforming German Bunds, he said.

Corporate credit spreads have also widened in the tumult. Option-adjusted spreads on European investment grade credit over government debt rose from 0.8 percentage points in early September to 1 percentage point last Friday, according to an Ice BofA index, before edging back to 0.95 points on Tuesday.

“We saw the moves over recent days as overdone and have been bottom-fishing in a few French corporates,” said James Carter, co-head of fixed income at investment house W1M, saying it bought bonds including those issued by insurer Axa and banking group BNP Paribas.

While some managers have bought back into French government bonds, others say they are reluctant to push against a long trend of underperformance.

Yields fell on Tuesday as investors responded positively to far-right presidential frontrunner Marine Le Pen's promises of fiscal rectitude but jumped again on Wednesday as oil prices rose and investors said huge uncertainty remained about the direction of France's public finances in the run-up to April's presidential election.

The image contains only a stylistic horizontal line, which must be ignored according to the rules. According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored and not represented by underscores or any other character in the OCR output.

Therefore, the corrected OCR text is:

[empty string]

Asset management

The image contains only a stylistic horizontal line that must be ignored according to Rule 2. No text or placeholder characters should be output.

FCA proposes 90 days' notice for investor withdrawals from funds with illiquid assets

MARTIN ARNOLD AND EMMA DUNKLEY

Investors in funds focused on property, infrastructure and private companies will be forced to wait three months to withdraw their money under new rules proposed by the financial regulator.

The move announced yesterday is designed to avoid liquidity mismatches at funds with hard-to-sell assets that are unable to meet investor requests to withdraw their money, as happened during the 2022 market turmoil after then prime minister Liz Truss's mini-budget, and the 2020 pandemic.

The Financial Conduct Authority said funds with a majority of their holdings in illiquid assets such as property, infrastructure or unlisted companies would no longer be able to offer investors the ability to take their money out daily.

Under the proposals, which the FCA said would bring the UK in line with international standards, investors would have to give 90 days' notice before they could withdraw their cash.

“Funds should be clear about whether they offer quick access or are built for longer-term investments like property,” said Michelle Beck, FCA director of markets. “Our rules will help firms make that clearer and give the market more confidence to invest.”

It is the second time in six years that the FCA has made such proposals. In 2020 it considered introducing a minimum notice period of up to six months for investors to take their money out of property funds. But it abandoned this after pushback from the industry and as

'Funds should be clear about whether they . . . are built for longer-term investments like property'

it waited for international standards from Iosco, the International Organization of Securities Commissions.

In 2022 the sharp rise in bond yields, which made commercial property a less attractive asset and forced many pension funds to sell, led to a surge in redemption requests, prompting property fund managers to defer withdrawals and restrict redemptions.

Former star manager Neil Woodford also came under scrutiny over the suspension of his flagship £3.6bn equity fund in 2019, after a wave of withdrawal requests, over concerns about the liquidity of its private assets and the poor performance of larger liquid stocks.

The measures come as more firms seek to sell private asset funds to retail investors through wealth managers and execution-only “DIY” sites. However, concerns have been raised over whether all retail investors understand that they cannot easily pull their money out.

“Rushed sales can lower prices, harm investors who stay invested and put pressure on markets,” the FCA said.

The regulator estimated that 17 funds, including feeder funds, with an aggregate net asset value of about £7.22bn would be caught by the proposals. They would have two years to comply and have to give investors at least a year's notice. The regulator has invited feedback on its plans until December 11.

Jonathan Lipkin, director of policy strategy and innovation at the Investment Association trade body, welcomed the FCA's move, particularly its proposals to adjust the rules so that Self-Invested Personal Pensions could continue to invest in such funds.

Financials

Wise seeks deal with UK tax authorities after software failures hit its customers

LAITH AL-KHALAF — LONDON

Wise is attempting to negotiate a settlement with the UK's HM Revenue & Customs after software failures caused some investment customers to pay too much or too little tax during a four-year period.

The money transfer app contacted about 4,000 UK users of its Wise Asset service — in which customers have invested \$9bn globally — this week to say it had provided them with incorrect tax statements between 2021 and 2025.

In an email seen by the FT, the company said it was in talks with HMRC about a “bulk settlement” to cover any shortfall in taxes arising from the error, which was caused by a third-party supplier. It would compensate customers who had overpaid, it said.

Wise said the issue stemmed from miscalculations made by its third-party software on the sums people had earned on their stocks and fund investments — which must be declared to HMRC.

The error meant that about 4,000 users were given incorrect capital gains and income figures to declare in their self-assessment tax returns. Not everyone who received an incorrect tax statement would have paid the wrong amount of tax, it added, due to changes in customers' personal circumstances.

The company said: “Wise identified that errors in software used by a third-party provider led to incorrect tax statements for a limited number of customers using our Wise Interest and Stocks investment products.”

It added: “We have fixed the issue, issued corrected statements to affected customers and are proactively redressing potential liabilities, with no ongoing risk to customers.”

Wise has also faced scrutiny over its money laundering controls

Shares in the money transfer app fell 2.2 per cent yesterday by the close of trading in London.

The error is the latest issue for Wise, which has this year faced scrutiny over its money laundering controls and compliance functions.

In June, it emerged that Belgian authorities were investigating the company over potential money laundering offences and whether its accounts were used by international criminal groups.

The following month the fintech's application for a US banking licence was rejected by regulators because of “deficiencies” in the fintech's anti-money laundering checks.

Wise, which has 19mn users globally, was founded in 2011 by Taavet Hinrikus and Kristo Käärmann.

Käärmann, Wise's chief executive, was fined £350,000 by the UK financial regulator in 2024 for breaching conduct rules and failing to notify them of “significant tax issues”.

Wise was a darling of the UK fintech sector and listed in London in 2021 at an almost £9bn valuation. But it shocked the City last year when it decided to shift its primary listing to the US.

Repeated US Treasury interventions risk eroding credibility

Mohamed El-Erian Markets Insight

F

or much of the past year, both the real economy and financial markets have operated under the expanding shadow of US economic statecraft.

This has ranged from more aggressive industrial policy to tariff escalation and export restrictions as well as expanding moral suasion. As a result, resource allocation and price discovery in markets have increasingly drifted from commercial and economic logic, influenced more by geopolitics, national security and domestic political expediency.

One of the most striking features of this geoeconomic era is the US Treasury department's growing willingness to intervene directly in financial market pricing. One such intervention, aimed at stabilising the Argentine peso, achieved its objective. A second, intended to suppress long-term Treasury yields and damp bond market volatility, has stumbled. The jury is out on a third initiative to bolster the Japanese yen.

Taken together, these three examples provide critical lessons on when unconventional direct market intervention can succeed – and importantly when the credibility of this tool can be eroded.

In Argentina, a depreciating peso fuelled inflation and undermined support for President Javier Milei ahead of key elections. The US Treasury stepped in by providing a dollar swap line, an agreement to exchange currencies, to an ally of President Donald Trump.

Framed by Treasury secretary Scott Bessent as an effort to contain regional systemic risk, markets saw the move more as a political lifeline. The intervention succeeded. The peso stabilised and inflation dynamics moderated. The success was aided by the fact that the Argentine foreign exchange market is small and Milei's policy stance is generally supportive of the currency.

A subsequent attempt by the US Treasury to manage domestic sovereign yields has proved far less effective. Reacting to a sharp rise in yields, Bessent announced that the Treasury would step up its buyback programme for long-dated bonds and consider other measures, if needed. The rationale was to smooth out “disorderly” moves during illiquid summer conditions. Many market participants, however, viewed it as an attempt to suppress mortgage rates ahead of the US midterm elections. Over the weeks that followed, yields

These three examples provide critical lessons on unconventional direct market intervention

across the curve continued to surge, rising about 0.5 percentage points.

The US Treasury market is immense, globally integrated, and driven by powerful structural dynamics that cannot easily be overcome. They include rising government bond issuance to fund a fiscal deficit of 6 per cent of GDP, the refinancing of maturing debt at much higher rates, and heavy corporate borrowing to fund tech-related investments. This is occurring as demand from some historically reliable buyers is diminishing.

The experience in the currency markets with the Japanese yen falls between these two extremes. The intervention was framed as mitigating global financial instability and protecting US trade from an excessively cheap currency. Yet markets quickly recognised another motive: the need to minimise the risk of higher US yields from Japan's sales of Treasuries as it sought to raise dollars to defend the yen. While the yen initially appreciated, it has slipped back since. Unsurprisingly, the tactical intervention has struggled to overcome fundamental issues in Tokyo's monetary, fiscal and structural policy mix.

When asked in an Axios interview about the interventions, Bessent declared: "The house doesn't win every hand. The house plays percentages." This referenced his earlier claim — "I am the house now" — evoking the casino saying that the house always comes out ahead. Viewing sovereign market interventions through the lens of a casino operator risks misdiagnosing the factors at play. The power of policymaker interventions in pricing depends largely on market size and the state of the underlying fundamentals.

Market intervention is meant to be a "circuit breaker" to interrupt non-fundamental, self-reinforcing market dynamics or severe liquidity stress. When deployed sparingly during genuine dislocations, it carries immense signal value and potency. But when used repeatedly to try to counter underlying market fundamentals, achieve short-term political objectives, or manage prices in deep, liquid global asset classes, its effectiveness can diminish. Using it as a routine policy lever rather than an emergency safety valve risks turning a market stabiliser into a source of moral hazard and deeper volatility.

Mohamed El-Erian is the Rene M Kern professor of practice at Wharton School, chief economic adviser at Allianz and chair of Gramercy Funds Management

The day in the markets

Source: LSEG

What you need to know

- Escalation of Mideast hostilities pushes oil benchmark Brent above \$105 - Transit levels via Strait of Hormuz rose last month but have since fallen sharply - President Donald Trump later holds 'productive' discussions with Iran

Oil prices surged as much as 5 per cent yesterday, pushing global crude benchmark Brent above \$105 per barrel following an escalation of hostilities in the Middle East and amid signs that a revival in shipping through the Strait of Hormuz is petering out.

Prices later fell back to just below \$104 per barrel. Data from trade consultancy Kpler showed that average weekly flows through the Strait of Hormuz rose as high as 15mn barrels a day in late September, almost 90 per cent of prewar levels.

But these levels have since fallen back to about 11mn b/d. Preliminary data showed just 4mn barrels transiting the strait on Tuesday.

UK Maritime Trade Operations, which monitors shipping, reported nine attacks on vessels near the strait in the first week of October after 13 over the course of September.

It said it was advised on Wednesday evening that a tanker had been struck by multiple projectiles off the coast of Qatar and that casualties had been reported.

Separate security sources said Iran had fired missiles at a tanker off the coast of Oman on Wednesday night, the first such attack outside the strait for a month.

Saudi Arabia said a man and two women were killed in separate attacks claimed by Iran-backed Houthis on two Saudi airports on Tuesday and

Wednesday with dozens of people injured.

The Atlantic magazine reported on Wednesday that President Donald Trump was considering a plan to strike Iran before the November midterm elections.

Brent gave up part of its earlier gains yesterday after Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform that the US has been having “productive discussions” with Iran and “will not be attacking” before the elections.

A hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico has forced some US producers to halt production. West Texas Intermediate, the

US oil benchmark, gained 5.1 per cent to \$92.80 per barrel yesterday.

Much of the oil transiting the Strait of Hormuz recently has done so via shuttle services in which a small number of tankers cross the waterway and transfer cargoes to ships waiting outside the Gulf.

The resulting high cost of shipping, along with a sharp reduction in refining capacity, has boosted prices of crude and of refined products. Brent is trading about 45 per cent above its price on the eve of the Iran war while European diesel is up almost 100 per cent. Verity Ratcliffe, Alice Hancock and Ian Smith

Markets update

	US	Eurozone	Japan	UK	China	Brazil
Stocks	S&P 500	Eurofirst 300	Nikkei 225	FTSE100	Shanghai Comp	Bovespa
Level	7758.35	2498.80	69042.11	10441.60	3811.90	206725.95
% change on day	-0.56	-0.74	-1.42	-0.16	-0.79	1.19
Currency	$ index (DXY)	$ per €	Yen per $	$ per £	Rmb per $	Real per $
Level	102.32	1.121	158.215	1.323	6.70	5.012
% change on day	0.08	0.125	0.070	0.057	-0.04	0.310
Govt. bonds	10-Year Treasury	10-year-Bund	10-year JGB	10-Year Gilt	10-year-bond	10-year-bond
Yield	5.27	3.47	3.04	5.41	1.69	12.76
Basis point change on day	-0.04	0.00	-0.03	0.03	0.01	-0.19
World / Commods	FTSE All-World	Oil - Brent	Oil - WTI	Gold	Silver	Metals (LMEX)
Level	750.25	105.74	92.88	4111.46	58.76	5806.80
% change on day	-0.67	4.87	5.21	0.12	-1.90	0.23

Main equity markets

Biggest movers

*	US
	Chipotle Mexican	6.52
	Marathon Petrol	4.28
Ups	Philip Morris Intl	4.13
	Valero Energy	3.75
	Best Buy	3.38
Downs	Vistra	-5.04
	Starbucks	-4.80
	Constellation Energy	-4.03
	Eli Lilly	-3.93
	Garmin	-3.85

Prices taken at 17:00 GMT Oct 08

Eurozone
Repsol	5.06
Verbund AG	3.01
TotalEnergies	2.86
Eni	2.66
Schneider Electric	2.57

Nokia	-4.78
Volkswagen	-4.50
Volkswagen pfd	-4.50
Fresenius SE & Co	-3.92
STMicroelectronics	-3.83

Based on the constituents of the FTSE Eurofirst 300 Eurozone
The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

UK
Rightmove	8.91
Tesco	5.17
Imperial Brands	5.06
Bridgepoint Group	4.71
Mony Group	4.27
Oxford Nanopore Technologies	-8.98
Unite Group	-5.07
RHI Magnesita	-4.75
Polar Capital Global Healthcare	-4.02
Oxford Instruments	-4.00

All data provided by ICE. www.ice.com

Fixed income

Credit risk jumps at Musk's SpaceX on worries over its borrowing spree

KATE DUGUID, MICHELLE CHAN AND GEORGE STEER — NEW YORK

A measure of credit risk at Elon Musk's SpaceX rose to a record high while its bonds dropped after the rockets-to-AI group's new plans to raise \$40bn in debt to buy Nvidia chips spooked investors.

The spread on SpaceX's five-year credit default swaps rose to 194 basis points on Wednesday after the FT reported on the fundraising plans, meaning that it now costs \$19,400 annually to protect \$1mn of its debt against default.

The CDS began trading in June at around 110bp. Investors were also selling SpaceX's debt, pushing the yield over Treasuries on its 2056 bond up 0.09 percentage points on Wednesday to 2.36 percentage points, according to Market-Axess data.

The so-called spread, a measure of the premium investors demand to hold the bonds rather than ultra-low-risk US government debt, registered 1.75 percentage points in June.

SpaceX is seeking to raise \$10bn in bank loans and \$30bn in investment-grade debt to fund its purchases of the chips, the FT reported on Tuesday. Private capital firm Apollo was expected to lead the deal while bond giant Pimco was among lenders in talks to fund it.

It comes after the company issued

'Last night I asked a room of clients "who here owns SpaceX shares?" Not a single hand went up'

\$25bn in investment grade debt in June just weeks after raising \$86bn in its historic initial public offering. The new debt deal suggests Musk is doubling down on his bet on Nvidia's technology.

Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said some investors were sceptical that Musk's company would achieve “success as a major provider of frontier AI models” or launch “any amount of orbital compute in any time horizon”.

Jonas wrote in a note to clients: “I regularly present to large groups of clients and ask the room ‘who here owns [SpaceX] shares?’ Last night, when I did that in front of 40 clients, not a single hand went up.”

The \$40bn fundraising effort is the latest in a series of blockbuster debt deals by the leading Silicon Valley tech groups to fund the construction of AI infrastructure across the US.

Hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of bonds and loans have been issued by the likes of Alphabet, Meta, Oracle and Amazon across public and private markets. CDS of other tech groups that are borrowing vast amounts to fund AI projects have also come under pressure.

The cost of Oracle's five-year CDS has climbed 40bp since the start of last month to 244bp. The same CDS for chipmaker Nvidia has risen to about 81bp from 45bp in early July.

Equivalent contracts for Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft have also surged over the past few weeks and are now quoted close to record highs.

Day ▷ -1.35% Month ▷ -4.93% Year ▷ 14.08%

	Index	All World
Sep 08 - Oct 08
Xetra Dax Frankfurt
	26007.63	24806.97

Stock Market movements over last 30 days, with the FTSE All-World in the same currency as a comparison

WORLD MARKETS AT A GLANCE

Change during previous day's trading (%)

Dow Jones Ind

FTSE 100

FTSE EuroFirst

-0.16%

Sep 08 - Oct 08
S&P 500	New York
Index	All World
7673.52	7758.35

Day ↩ -0.56%	Month ↗ 1.49%	Year ↗ 15.32%
Nasdaq Composite		New York

Day ▷ -0.16% Month ▷ -3.31% Year ▷ 9.52%

Country	Index	Latest	Previous
Australia	All Ordinaries	8923.20	8694.60
Australia	S&P ASX 200	8660.90	8727.70
Australia	S&P ASX 200 Res	7677.40	7794.00
Austria	ATX	6560.57	6611.99
Belgium	BEL 20	5399.40	5527.87
Belgium	BEL Mid	6352.88	6408.21
Brazil	Bovespa	206725.95	204302.33
Canada	S&P TSX 60	2063.17	2064.92
Canada	S&P TSX Comp	35010.31	35041.86
Chile	SS&P/OLX IGPA GEN	56930.02	56920.02
China	China FSE A300	10894.94	11022.05
China	China Shanghai A	3985.51	4028.34
China	China Shanghai B	328.19	3365.56
China	China Shanghai Comp	3811.90	3845.29
China	Shenzhen A	2474.90	2515.90
China	Shenzhen B	1154.28	1161.63
Croatia	CROBEX	4490.61	4496.15
Cyprus	CSE M&P GEN	305.30	314.00

	Day	%	Month	%	Year
	Bovespa		Sao Paulo
	187366.84		206725.95

Country	Index	Latest	Previous
Czech Republic	Czech Republic PX	2545.27	2565.99
Denmark	OMC Copenhagen 20	1485.16	1509.01
Egypt	ESEA 30	5326.20	5326.20
Estonia	OMX Tallinn	2228.71	2229.77
Finland	OMK Helsinki General	13865.05	13630.87
France	French CAC40	7729.69	7769.21
Sregion	SBF 120	5860.44	5897.00
Germany	M-DAX	29506.83	30112.41
Germany	Tec-Dax	3965.53	4048.53
Germany	XETRA Dax	24806.97	25104.36
Greece	Athens	2568.05	2622.02
Greece	FTSE/ASIA	6577.49	6722.56
Hong Kong	Hang Seng	23765.79	24130.50
Hong Kong	HS China Enterprises	8010.50	8082.40
Hong Kong	HSCC Red Chip	4029.81	4008.30
Hungary	Bux	137165.79	141308.07
India	BSE Sensex	71593.24	72638.70
Indonesia	Jakarta Comp	6037.28	6146.72

Nikkei

STOCK MARKET: BIGGEST MOVERS

Hang Seng \$ per € 0.1251%

Day ▷ -0.51% Month ▷ -2.60% Year ▷ -3.78%

Country	Index	Latest	Previous
Ireland	ISED Overall	14053.78	14344.11
Israel	Tel Aviv 125	3934.01	3832.42
Italy	FTSE Italia All-Share	51818.10	52533.03
Italy	FTSE Italia Mid Cap	59077.62	59769.58
Italy	FTSE MIB	49297.88	49972.25
Japan	Nikkei 225	69042.11	70035.71
Japan	Topix	4091.46	4154.11
Kuwait	KSK Market Index	8860.03	8918.53
Latvia	OMX Riga	977.66	982.54
Lithuania	OMX Virus	1505.51	1508.72
Luxembourg	Lux	1747.59	1774.59
Mexico	IPC Mexico City	64723.28	64653.33
Malaysia	FTSE Bursa KLD	1601.01	1611.78
Morocco	MASI	16749.18	16990.77
Netherlands	AEX	1121.20	1117.75
Netherlands	AEX All Share	1530.83	1521.75
New Zealand	NZX 50	13691.85	13684.04
Nigeria	SE All Share	248402.50	250396.75

EURO MARKETS ACTIVE STOCKS

Country	Index	Latest	Previous
Norway	Dolo All Share	2452.58	2444.94
Pakistan	KSE 100	167441.00	168580.41
Philippines	Manila Comp	5610.39	5736.69
Poland	Wig	155764.56	156686.10
Portugal	PSI 20	9347.66	9333.76
Portugal	PSI General	6354.43	6345.98
Romania	Romania BET Index	33557.95	33562.51
Russia	Russia Traded Index in USD	988.10	988.10
Saudi Arabia	TAHAR/UL All Share Index	10376.28	10542.23
Singapore	FTSE Strata Times	5412.96	5608.44
Slovakia	SAX	320.00	320.42
South Africa	SBI TOP	3104.77	3117.11
	FTSE/JSE All Share Index	107109.29	107104.29
South Africa	FTSE/JSE Res	64600.65	64609.32
South Africa	FTSE/JSE Top 40	99406.91	99394.06
South Korea	Kospi	6625.93	6803.90
South Korea	Kospi 200	1044.52	1073.63
Spain	Spain BRX 35	18928.90	19118.00

UK MARKET WINNERS & LOSERS

FTSE All World

\$ per £ 0.0567% ¥ per \$ 0.0696%

Day ▷ -0.79% Month ▷ -3.26% Year ▷ 5.58%

Country	Index	Latest	Previous
Sweden	DMX Stockholm 30	3202.44	3226.82
Sweden	DMX Stockholm AS	1104.05	1112.14
Switzerland	SMI Index	13637.00	13808.42
Taiwan	Weighted Stock Index	49313.44	49806.37
Thailand	Bangkok SET	1570.61	1584.63
Turkey	BIST 100	12213.58	12122.94
UK	FTSE 100	10441.60	10458.50
UK	FTSE 4Good UK	9960.32	9990.61
UK	FTSE All Share	5634.04	5644.81
UK	FTSE techMARK 100	9420.03	9493.63
U.S.A.	Dow Jones Composite	15978.69	15976.75
U.S.A.	Dow Jones Industrial	51100.26	51179.67
U.S.A.	Dow Jones Transport	19670.24	19529.30
U.S.A.	Dow Jones Utilities	404.43	407.78
U.S.A.	Nasdaq 100	30958.38	31160.08
U.S.A.	Nasdaq Composite	27368.68	27538.69
U.S.A.	NYSE Composite	23679.42	23701.92
U.S.A.	S&P 500	7758.35	7801.77

FT.COM/MARKETSDATA

£ per € 0.0709%

Day ▷ -1.44% Month ▷ -5.27% Year ▷ -12.45%

ACTIVE STOCKS	stock traded m's	close price	Day's change
Nippon Tel & Tel	169.67	172.10	-
Tokio Marine Hldgs	103.75	518.10	2.10
SoftBank Corp	70.13	241.30	0.60
SoftBank Grp Corp	37.80	6040.00	-270.00
Mitsubishi UFJ	36.87	3504.00	-118.00
Nissan Motor Co	35.39	283.00	-2.10
Tokyo Electric Power	34.77	514.60	-2.30
Nippon Steel	30.63	631.30	-9.90
Taiyo Yuden	30.20	10955.00	-505.00
Fujikura	29.77	5512.00	-188.00
BIGGEST MOVERS	Close	Day's	Day's

FTSE 100	price(£)	% Chg week	% Chg ytd
Winners
Imperial Brands	26.14	7.84	-16.19
Experian	25.74	6.06	-23.46
Autotrader Group	4.86	5.54	-17.14
Tosco	5.00	5.39	13.26
Shell	37.80	5.34	37.97
Compass	23.25	5.25	-1.65
Haleon	3.44	5.03	-8.14
8P	5.85	4.97	35.12
Bund	27.10	4.96	30.54
The Sage Grp	10.28	4.93	-5.12

ACTIVE STOCKS	stock traded m's	close price	Day's change
Intesa Sanpaolo	73.20	6.06	-0.18
Stellantis	46.16	4.00	-0.12
Banco Santander	27.14	11.91	-0.35
Enel	23.73	8.76	0.03
Banco De Sabadell	17.44	3.51	-
Royal KPN	11.74	3.95	-0.01
ING Group	10.78	29.43	-0.81
Nokia	10.76	9.09	-0.46
Eni	10.74	24.88	0.65
Iberdrola	10.37	21.11	0.18
BIGGEST MOVERS	Close	Day's	Day's

Country	Index	Latest	Previous
Venezuela	IBC	8595.50	7602.12
Vietnam	Viet Nam Index	1739.97	1753.39
Cross-Border	Euro Stoxx 50 (Eur)	6126.73	6180.29
Netherlands	Euronext 100 ID	1949.99	1857.43
Cross-Border	FTSE Food Global ($)	21172.99	21349.40
Cross-Border	FTSE All World ($)	749.49	755.28
Cross-Border	FTSE €300	2468.80	2517.48
Cross-Border	FTSE Eurotop 100	4829.01	4884.26
Cross-Border	FTSE Global 100 ($)	5679.71	5937.77
Cross-Border	FTSE Gold Min ($)	5388.38	5388.38
Cross-Border	FTSE Limbase Top (Eur)	7156.60	7164.60
Cross-Border	FTSE World ($)	1404.70	1414.95
Cross-Border	FT$/Eurofirst 100 (Eur)	6941.84	6982.68
Cross-Border	FT$/Eurofirst 80 ID	8362.32	8431.25

AMERICA
ACTIVE STOCKS	stock traded m's	close price	Day's change
Intel	48.05	109.56	-3.56
Nvidia	40.28	235.54	-1.93
Palantir	28.64	198.38	4.26
Super Micro Computer	19.12	43.15	-
Starbucks	16.28	89.09	-4.49
Netflix	15.67	71.09	1.39
Tesla	12.15	373.12	-4.68
Micron Technology	11.78	1072.73	-15.27
Amazon.com	11.39	259.00	-0.92
Alphabet CI A	10.56	349.27	-1.23
BIGGEST MOVERS	Close	Day's	Day's

ACTIVE STOCKS	stock traded m's	close price	Day's change
Lloyds Bkg Gp	234.13	1.01	-0.02
Vodafone	45.97	1.24	-0.03
Barclays	39.56	4.26	-0.06
BP	35.38	5.85	0.23
Haleon	33.15	3.44	0.02
Taylor Wimpey	33.08	0.74	-0.03
NatWest Group	32.74	6.40	-0.10
Glencore	31.96	5.69	-
Tesco	30.09	5.00	0.25
HSBC	24.50	13.81	-0.27

FTSE 250	price(£)	% Chg week	% Chg ytd
Winners
Wetherspoon (JD)	10.02	23.25	35.86
Avon Technologies	22.55	22.69	24.31
Bridgepoint Group	3.83	13.60	34.81
Rightmove	5.03	11.61	-3.27
Ocado Group	2.84	9.83	20.25
Baltic Classifieds Group	1.88	8.14	-7.33
Mony Group	1.85	7.35	0.92
W.A.G Payment Solutions	0.99	6.11	-5.71
Clarkson	52.65	5.89	38.01
Domino's Pizza	2.23	5.39	28.60

Company Name	Price	change	change%
Ups
Chipotle Mexican	32.77	2.00	6.52
Marathon Petrol	461.20	18.94	4.28
Philip Morris Intl	200.65	7.96	4.13
Valero Energy	440.00	15.90	3.75
Best Buy	87.45	2.86	3.38
Downs
Vistra	158.31	-8.41	-5.04
Starbucks	89.09	-4.49	-4.80
Constellation Energy	287.50	-12.09	-4.03
Eli Lilly	1142.00	-46.72	-3.93
Garmin	265.54	-10.62	-3.85

FTSE Small Cap	price(£)	% Chg week	% Chg yld
Winners
Kenmare Resources	2.38	25.13	-3.64
Blackrock Latin American Inv Tst	4.60	14.43	13.86
Synthomer	1.08	8.36	69.98
Eurocell	1.47	8.09	12.64
Aston Martin Lagonda	0.36	7.70	-42.79
Brown Advisory US Smaller Co's	16.57	6.94	19.24
Ultico Emerging Mkts	2.95	5.36	9.67
Ashtead Technology	5.50	4.56	77.42
ASA International	2.39	4.37	26.12
Castings	2.87	4.36	5.51

CURRENCIES

Industry Sectors	price(£)	%Chg week	%Chg ytd
Winners
Real Estate Investment & Svcs	1981.42	5.78	-7.48
Consumer Digital Services	175.08	5.35	-8.41
Consumer Services	4078.45	5.25	-1.65
Oil Gas & Coal	11885.96	5.16	36.75
Energy	12495.69	5.12	36.78
Tobacco	45440.77	5.06	-4.37
Finance & Credit Services	13577.32	3.94	-6.25
Personal Care Drug & Grocery	4585.17	3.58	-2.86
Consumer Staples	17999.70	3.52	-1.83
Software & Computer Svcs	1859.04	3.34	-8.96

Brodeast RIOVERS
	Close price	Day's change	Day's change/%
Ups
Rightmove	5.03	0.41	8.91
Tesco	5.00	0.25	5.17
Imperial Brands	26.14	1.26	5.06
Bridgepoint Group	3.83	0.17	4.71
Mony Group	1.85	0.08	4.27
Downs
Oxford Nanopore Technologies	2.01	-0.20	-8.98
Unite Group	4.20	-0.22	-5.07
RHI Magnesita	27.05	-1.35	-4.75
Polar Capital Global Healthcare	4.17	-0.17	-4.02
Oxford Instruments	29.26	-1.22	-4.00

Losers				Losers
IG Group	9.63	-24.71	-26.77	Pennon
Lion Finance	123.70	-8.64	33.01	Vistry
Barratt Redrow	2.91	-8.28	-23.54	Inchca
3i Group	23.52	-7.55	-27.92	RHI Ma
Rolls-Royce	13.67	-7.12	18.87	Taylor
Balfour Beatty	8.66	-5.87	21.80	Unite G
Melrose Ind	4.38	-5.84	-25.51	Chemr
BAE SYSTEMS	18.36	-5.48	7.15	Hill & Co
Standard Chartered	21.08	-4.96	15.70	Shawd
Babcock Intl	9.05	-4.70	-27.22	Breed

BIGGEST MOVERS	Close price	Day's change	Day's change%
Ups
Repsol	30.09	1.45	5.06
Verbund AG	65.00	1.90	3.01
TotalEnergies	77.58	2.16	2.86
Eni	24.88	0.65	2.66
Schneider Electric	261.10	6.55	2.57
Downs
Nokia	9.09	-0.46	-4.78
Volkswagen	66.90	-3.15	-4.50
Volkswagen pfd	66.60	-3.14	-4.50
Fresenius SE & Co	41.59	-1.70	-3.92
STMicroelectronics	47.98	-1.91	-3.83

Company Name	Price	change	change%
Ups
Trend Micro	7232.00	271.00	3.89
Nomura Research Ins	5341.00	152.00	2.93
Ricoh	1709.50	39.00	2.33
Yamato Hldgs	2024.00	41.50	2.09
Nippon Yusen KK	7226.00	134.00	1.89
Downs
Sumco	3473.00	-211.00	-5.73
Komatsu	7397.00	-432.00	-5.52
Kubota Corp	2624.50	-150.50	-5.42
Sumitomo Heavy Ind	5893.00	-331.00	-5.32
Furukawa Electric	4220.00	-224.00	-5.04

Losers
7	Pennon Group	3.71	-16.37	-29.67
1	Vistry Group	2.17	-13.12	-66.14
4	Inchcape	6.58	-11.44	-14.43
2	RHI Magnesita	27.05	-11.31	-2.70
7	Taylor Wimpey	0.74	-8.49	-30.79
0	Unite Group	4.20	-7.90	-24.97
1	Chemring Group	4.99	-7.59	5.61
5	Hill & Smith	30.00	-7.55	40.19
0	Shawbrook Group	2.80	-7.28	-42.39
2	Breedon Group	2.96	-6.62	-10.09

Losers
7	The Smarter Web Company	0.61	-20.00
4	Hostelworld Group	0.90	-11.37
3	Biotech Growth Trust	13.64	-9.07
0	ASOS	4.62	-8.61
9	Mobico Group	0.22	-8.56
7	Marshalls	1.56	-8.34
1	Ibstock	0.75	-8.00
9	Vanquis Banking Gp	0.69	-6.53
9	Forterra	1.41	-6.11
9	Helical	1.75	-5.91

Losers
86.74	Alternative Energy	38.13	-10.57	73.42
27.68	Aerospace & Defense	22377.82	-6.42	11.46
13.67	Hhold Goods & Home Const	7960.09	-5.84	-26.20
62.79	Construction & Materials	15537.94	-4.49	13.48
5.46	Investment Banking & Brokerage	14007.68	-4.29	-9.46
13.62	Industrials	11202.70	-3.44	7.11
16.02	Banks	8585.34	-3.39	8.33
42.56	Leisure Goods	38462.16	-3.22	-14.25
23.73	Precious Metals & Mining	32686.38	-3.04	-5.32
11.63	Financials ex Inv Co	197.74	-2.78	3.83

Oct 08	DOLLAR			EURO			POUND
	Closing Mid	Day's Change	Weeks Change	Closing Mid	Day's Change	Weeks Change	Closing Mid	Day's Change
Argentine Peso	1519.2757	-3.2705	-5.7676	1702.7482	-1.5340	-15.1567	2009.4039	-3.1838
Australian Dollar	1.4363		-0.0077	1.8098	0.0021	-0.0168	1.8997	0.0010
Bahraini Dinar	0.3772	0.0001	0.0002	0.4238	0.0006	-0.0018	0.4980
Bolivian Boliviano	11.8500	-0.1200	-0.1750	13.2815	0.1177	-0.2308	16.0334	-0.1497
Brazilian Real	5.0120	0.0155	-0.2077	5.8174	0.0243	-0.2625	6.6292	0.0243
Canadian Dollar	1.4228	-0.0020	-0.0017	1.5947	0.0003	-0.0101	1.8000	-0.0015
Chinese Yuan	980.2300	1.5700	-3.7988	1089.1100	3.5702	-9.8506	121.4994	3.5398
Chinese Yuan	6.7015	-0.0039	-0.0039	7.5111	0.0051	-0.0425	8.9637	-0.0001
Colombian Peso	3224.9000	-13.7500	-88.0700	3614.6680	-10.8769	-117.5928	4265.4142	-15.7575
Costa Rican Colon	456.5000	0.1350		511.6454	0.7952	-2.5619	603.7903	0.5208
Czech Krone	21.7577	-0.0669	0.0231	24.3850	0.0445	-0.0908	28.7113	-0.0767
Danish Krone	6.6692	-0.0080	0.3347	7.4749	0.0004	-0.0003	8.8211	-0.0055
Egyptian Pound	52.4000	0.0300	0.0500	56.7259	0.1069	-0.2423	68.3066	0.0790
Hong Kong Dollar	7.8483	0.0001	0.0010	8.7856	0.0111	-0.0457	10.3686	0.0068
Hungarian Forint	325.3963	-0.7209	-1.1226	365.8250	-0.3500	-3.1250	431.7081	-0.7081
Indian Rupee	96.7862	0.0112	3.4915	108.4780	0.1481	0.0024	128.0144	0.0875

FTSE ACTUARIES SHARE INDICES

WeeksChange	Oct 08	DOLLAR			EURO			POUND
		Closing Price	Day's Change	Weeks Change	Closing Price	Day's Change	Weeks Change	Closing Price	Day's Change	Weeks Change
-5.1886	Indonesian Republic	17895.0000	15.0000	-50.0000	20056.7160	41.8430	-158.3270	23668.8230	-33.5290	-37.4210
-0.007	Israel Shekel	3.0636	-0.0087	-0.0214	3.4337	-0.0055	-0.0416	4.0521	-0.0092	-0.0234
-0.1792	Kenyan Diamond	158.2150	0.1100	0.4700	177.3273	0.3447	-0.3724	209.2831	0.2941	0.8741
-0.3663	Kuwaiti Dinar	128.8500	0.0300	0.1800	147.5359	0.2154	-0.5134	17.1462	0.1371	0.4445
-0.2663	Kuwaiti Dinar	0.3110	0.0006	0.0097	0.3486	0.0011	0.0006	0.4113	0.0010	0.0032
-3.4377	Mexican Peso	4.0915	0.0035	0.0060	4.5867	0.0097	-0.0165	5.4116	0.0077	0.0145
-3.4377	Mexican Peso	11.9921	-0.0164	-0.2887	20.1655	0.0046	-0.4216	2.7921	-0.0108	-0.3526
0.0055	New Zealand Dollar	1.7848	-0.0021	0.0010	2.0004	0.0002	-0.0082	2.3606	-0.0014	0.0052
111.1851	Nigerian Naira	1331.0800	2.1900	3.1500	1491.8746	4.3150	-4.0893	1790.5333	3.8933	5.2317
0.7368	Norwegian Krone	9.5628	-0.0071	-0.0595	10.7180	0.0054	-0.1215	12.6483	-0.0022	-0.0633
276.653	Russian Ruble	276.9530	-	-0.1000	318.7475	0.3877	-1.6115	368.7489	0.2076	0.3197
0.0550	Peruvian Nuevo Sol	3.4415	-0.0092	-0.0126	3.8572	0.0033	-0.0538	4.5519	-0.0096	-0.0111
0.1498	Philippine Peso	62.8950	0.1350	0.1075	70.4927	0.2392	-0.2374	83.1881	0.2256	0.2426
-0.1415	Polish Zloty	3.9884	-0.0046	0.0225	4.3895	0.0033	0.0026	21.6894	-0.0032	0.0326
-0.9607	Romanian Leu	4.7701	-0.0131	0.0280	5.3463	0.0080	-0.0244	6.3931	-0.0137	0.0424
0.8047	Russian Ruble	85.0500	-0.4500	1.7500	95.3240	-0.3847	1.4865	112.4915	-0.5310	2.4479

	£ Strtg Dct	Day's chg %	Euro Index	£ Strtg Oct 7	£ Strtg Dec 6	Year ago	Yield Div Cover	P/E ratio	XO adj	Total Return
FTSE 100 (100)	10441.60	-0.16	9863.99	10458.50	10541.69	9931.38	3.15	2.22	14.34	2752.62
FTSE 100 ex Investment Trusts (95)	3411.52	-0.16	3137.86	3416.94	3444.16	3251.79	3.19	2.09	14.98	91.25
FTSE 250 (251)	23943.88	-0.39	22023.15	24036.75	24215.23	23740.38	3.23	2.67	11.69	613.71
FTSE 250 ex Inc to (164)	24727.54	-0.21	22743.94	24778.94	24988.77	23306.14	3.24	1.70	18.19	663.64
FTSE 350 (351)	5694.94	-0.19	5238.10	5705.54	5750.60	5403.23	3.15	2.27	14.00	149.82
FTSE 350 ex Investment Trusts (259)	5619.27	-0.16	5168.51	5628.43	5673.43	5351.90	3.19	2.06	15.19	150.28
FTSE 350 Higher Yield (134)	5007.26	0.28	4679.17	5037.12	5116.77	4626.85	4.28	1.92	12.17	171.67
FTSE SmallCap ex US$ (217)	5660.26	-0.72	5178.20	5785.00	5849.00	5479.39	3.19	18.94	16.64	147.30
FTSE SmallCap ex (176)	8008.04	-0.57	7420.86	8114.13	8155.76	7537.89	4.07	1.58	15.59	233.65
FTSE SmallCap ex Inv ex Co (97)	6711.43	-0.45	6178.58	6748.15	6771.26	6260.89	3.87	0.54	48.09	171.11
FTSE SmallCap Financials ex Inv ex Co (13)	147.84	-0.12	142.25	148.01	148.61	150.06	5.46	1.14	11.87	7.00
FTSE All-Share (527)	5634.04	-0.19	5192.09	5644.81	5689.19	5350.38	3.16	2.25	14.02	148.42
FTSE All-Share ex Inv ex Co (356)	5517.23	-0.16	5074.65	5526.33	5570.34	5253.82	3.20	2.05	15.26	147.51
FTSE Fledgling (41)	12915.12	-0.52	11679.10	12982.13	13024.73	12925.03	5.63	-10.13	-1.75	310.26
FTSE Fledgling ex Inv ex Co (21)	17194.74	0.36	15815.41	17321.51	17316.07	24338.42	5.81	-0.89	-19.28	617.81
FTSE All-Small (217)	5557.47	-0.57	5148.45	5923.36	5658.04	5246.47	4.10	1.22	19.96	161.59
FTSE All-Small ex Inv ex Co (118)	5042.32	0.44	4638.66	5065.32	5080.50	4745.49	3.91	0.48	52.32	129.17
FTSE All-Mall Share (525)	7351.68	-0.68	7774.20	7774.20	7774.20	7653.62	3.03	0.80	10.00	97.20
FTSE All-Share Technology (20)	1985.48	0.27	1826.10	1980.00	1983.25	2154.29	2.48	1.85	21.75	47.38
FTSE All-Share Telecommunications (5)	2157.78	1.82	1984.69	2197.71	2158.57	1838.12	3.25	0.80	38.28	41.30
FTSE All-Share Health Care (12)	15801.73	-2.21	14534.14	16518.19	15884.26	17767.22	2.50	2.43	16.49	360.33
FTSE All-Share Financials (231)	8128.25	-1.16	7476.22	8223.53	8446.17	7738.99	3.68	2.96	9.18	268.27
FTSE All-Share Real Estate (38)	754.63	-0.63	726.10	759.39	764.52	779.49	1.20	1.02	18.79	31.55
FTSE All-Share Consumer Discretionary (88)	5969.42	-0.40	5490.57	5993.33	5989.59	6097.31	2.44	2.12	19.32	122.51
FTSE All-Share Consumer Staples (28)	19791.32	1.28	18230.74	19514.58	19278.18	20155.95	4.11	1.41	17.27	573.98
FTSE All-Share Industrials (80)	11676.91	0.85	10740.21	11777.36	11972.36	10982.88	1.62	2.06	29.94	158.40
FTSE All-Share Basic Materials (23)	1127.31	-0.31	10317.47	11252.68	11456.07	9106.88	2.65	0.83	20.22	179.67
FTSE All-Share Services (2)	12722.17	3.71	11927.73	13613.73	13613.73	11549.88	2.55	0.84	17.77	246.71
FTSE All-Share Utilities (5)	10864.11	0.07	9982.60	10856.55	10953.43	10509.92	3.78	1.52	17.35	289.41
FTSE All-Share Software & Computer Socs (18)	2146.39	0.29	1974.27	2140.21	2118.07	2341.56	2.51	1.84	21.64	51.75
FTSE All-Share Tech Hardware & Equip (2)	4411.60	-1.04	4057.71	4458.17	4550.71	2276.41	0.00	0.00	40.52	0.00
FTSE All-Share Telecoms Sec Providers (5)	3361.31	-1.82	3091.67	3423.51	3382.55	2863.35	3.25	0.80	38.28	64.34
FTSE All-Share Health Care Providers (2)	10604.43	-0.95	9753.77	10705.79	10741.44	8413.29	1.10	1.36	66.83	28.78
FTSE All-Share Medical Equipment & Svcs (2)	5095.44	-1.60	4686.69	5178.17	5158.53	6125.00	2.20	2.12	16.53	145.18
FTSE All-Share Pharmaceuticals & Biotech (8)	23773.40	-2.24	20546.56	23235.00	23882.88	25560.82	2.49	2.44	16.43	514.99
FTSE All-Share Banks (13)	8472.13	-1.80	7792.51	8627.55	8877.28	7620.31	3.91	2.69	9.78	303.71
FTSE All-Share Credit & Payment Services (1)	16674.59	-0.61	14109.86	14159.86	14159.86	13999.86	3.83	2.63	16.63	246.78
FTSE All-Share Inv Banking & Brokerage Socs (3)	11917.18	-0.48	11010.87	12209.21	12375.54	13207.98	4.18	2.85	8.39	408.99
FTSE All-Share Closed End Investments (171)	15540.54	-0.63	14239.19	15638.97	15735.01	14072.94	2.61	6.49	5.91	306.68
FTSE All-Share Life Insurance (5)	7761.80	-0.56	7139.16	7805.83	7998.44	6294.18	5.21	1.17	16.40	401.46
FTSE All-Share Nutrile Insurance (4)	6573.78	-0.49	6046.45	6605.96	6633.93	5171.05	3.55	1.27	22.16	224.06
FTSE All-Share Real Estate Inv & Socs (10)	1887.29	4.26	1735.89	1810.09	1799.83	2360.18	2.34	1.77	24.18	427.68
FTSE All-Share Real Estate Investment Trts (28)	1881.80	-1.32	1730.85	1906.98	1923.22	1926.13	5.67	0.97	18.18	84.31
FTSE All-Share Automobiles & Parts (1)	925.48	-0.66	851.24	931.59	932.06	1437.94	0.00	0.00	-0.82	0.00
FTSE All-Share Consumer Services (2)	3032.86	0.76	3525.40	3804.06	3725.58	3889.56	2.20	1.77	25.71	84.26
FTSE All-Share World Goods & Home Comit (8)	6517.93	-2.05	5995.08	6654.30	6683.34	8888.71	3.14	3.09	15.00	153.13
FTSE All-Share Aerospace & Deformers (7)	4108.97	-1.18	2155.69	2157.96	2157.96	2157.96	3.14	3.09	15.00	153.13
FTSE All-Share Personal Goods (3)	14222.71	-0.90	13081.88	14351.21	14444.38	15672.83	0.27	11.75	31.98	37.50
FTSE All-Share Media (8)	12600.09	1.39	11589.33	12472.76	12517.02	12367.12	3.20	1.80	17.43	370.78
FTSE All-Share Retailers (19)	2700.95	-0.54	2484.29	2715.58	2738.75	2591.68	2.77	2.63	13.73	59.07
FTSE All-Share Travel & Leisure (24)	9937.43	-1.44	9140.27	10082.56	10172.60	9692.99	1.96	1.68	30.45	150.04
FTSE All-Share Beverages (5)	16404.24	0.68	15092.92	16286.24	16263.38	15618.32	3.26	1.55	19.86	189.93
FTSE All-Share Food Producers (10)	7666.22	0.73	7051.25	7610.45	7614.56	7556.92	2.83	1.96	18.04	115.21
FTSE All-Share Tobacco (2)	45440.65	2.47	4175.67	43445.85	43524.23	47515.58	5.83	1.30	12.83	3030.05
FTSE All-Share Construction & Materials (16)	15986.23	-1.00	14687.29	16178.79	16520.31	14300.56	2.77	2.23	16.20	356.03
FTSE All-Share Aerospace & Deformers (7)	2340.52	-1.56	2155.69	2269.21	2276.48	2199.86	3.09	2.09	16.99	349.99
FTSE All-Share Electrical & Electrical Equip (12)	17193.24	-0.32	15814.03	17248.70	17644.32	14821.05	0.97	3.02	34.24	141.00
FTSE All-Share General Industrials (6)	5673.51	-0.01	5402.35	5673.88	5597.40	5275.72	0.23	1.64	27.28	84.28
FTSE All-Share Industrial Engineering B (8)	15085.85	-1.11	13875.69	15254.90	15689.21	15129.60	2.35	1.60	26.60	303.42
FTSE All-Share Industrial Support Socs (26)	10016.15	0.50	9212.67	9966.23	9958.09	10512.10	2.30	1.49	29.13	200.55
FTSE All-Share Industrial Transportation (7)	6883.07	0.63	6330.93	6836.68	6864.19	5999.34	3.97	1.79	14.08	224.75
FTSE All-Share Precious Metals & Mining (5)	31077.46	-0.61	28584.48	31267.39	31888.24	32669.13	2.88	2.77	12.57	911.89
FTSE All-Share Chemicals (7)	8891.55	0.10	8250.17	8872.88	9011.20	7671.18	3.72	0.80	33.67	282.48
FTSE All-Share Oil & Gas & Coal (1)	11919.28	3.73	10963.14	11400.73	11400.75	8705.65	3.38	2.52	11.74	305.59
FTSE All-Share Alternative Energy (1)	17.23	-3.91	17.46	-7.93	-9.27	9.94	0.00	-18.88	0.00	17.23
FTSE All-Share Resources (2)	14108.98	-0.96	13043.41	14244.39	14387.64	13807.64	3.69	2.49	18.88	2348.98
FTSE All-Share Financials ex Inv ex Co (6)	157.59	-1.29	190.12	200.16	206.59	190.33	3.94	2.39	10.60	71.57
FTSE All-Share Gas Water & Multi-unitities (7)	9409.93	0.77	8665.09	9374.81	9470.79	9258.32	4.10	1.45	16.88	270.48
FTSE All-Share Industrial Metals & Mining (11)	10164.80	-0.31	9349.40	10198.22	10386.24	80083.63	2.57	2.05	19.05	258.55
FTSE All-Share Pesc Care Drug & Grocery Stn (1)	4767.37	0.84	4384.94	4727.60	4654.21	4902.73	3.44	1.44	20.26	128.25
NON FINANCIALS (28)	6296.88	0.20	5782.56	6274.16	6274.52	5966.81	2.95	1.90	17.78	148.38

FTSE SECTORS: LEADERS & LAGGARDS
Year to date percentage changes

UK RECENT RIGHTS ISSUES

Tech Hardware & Equip	123.53
Alternative Energy	73.42
Energy	36.78
Oil & Gas & Coal	36.75
Industrial Metals & Mining	27.05
Nonlife Insurance	27.01
Health Care Providers	26.04
Basic Materials	23.24
Telecommunications Svc Providers	17.39
Telecommunications	17.39
Chemicals	16.32
Industrial Transportation	16.25
Electronic & Electrical Equip	14.98
Construction & Materials	13.48
Aerospace & Defense	11.46
General Industrials	11.32
Closed-end Investments	10.97
Electricity	9.38
Banks	8.33

Oct 08	DOLLAR				EURO			POUND
	Closing Mid	Day's Change	Weeks Change	Closing Mid	Day's Change	Weeks Change	Closing Mid	Day's Change	Weeks Change
Saudi Riyal	3.7544	0.0002	-0.0001	4.2079	0.0054	-0.0761	4.9657	0.0000	0.0058
Singapore Dollar	1.2164	0.0013	-	1.6291	0.0032	-0.0073	1.6943	0.0027	0.0053
South African Rand	16.6266	-0.0247	-0.0471	18.6351	-0.0043	-0.1479	21.9912	-0.0201	-0.0356
South Korea Won	1338.1500	-2.1000	-20.1000	1489.7886	-0.4773	-30.2700	1769.8427	-1.7724	-24.4120
Swedish Krona	9.9853	-0.0300	-0.6025	11.1915	-0.0200	-0.1205	13.2071	-0.0326	-0.0679
Swiss Franc	0.8328	0.0002	0.0021	0.9335	0.0014	-0.0224	1.1016	0.0010	0.0041
Taiwan Dollar	31.3005	0.1175	0.0305	35.7877	0.1762	-0.1477	42.2328	0.1793	0.0914
Thai Baht	33.6650	-0.0125	-0.0200	37.7542	0.0332	-0.2146	44.5534	0.0087	0.0274
Tunisian Dinar	3.8044	-0.0035	0.0073	3.8744	-0.0002	-0.0625	3.9737	-0.0029	0.0146
Turkish Lira	49.2148	0.0175	0.1805	55.1599	0.0885	-0.0772	65.0839	0.0600	0.3172
UAE Dirham	3.6728	0.0001	0.0001	4.1165	0.0052	-0.0299	4.8578	0.0028	0.0059
Pound Sterling	0.7561	-0.0004	-0.0009	0.8474	0.0065	-0.0053	1.0000	-	-
United States Dollar	1.8000	-	-	1.8000	0.0014	-0.0527	3.2221	0.0007	0.0016
Vietnamese Dong	25899.5000	-81.0000	-82.5000	29028.1600	-54.4120	-240.5630	34255.9760	-87.6480	-67.5480
Euro	0.8922	-0.0011	0.0045	1.0000	-	1.1811	-	-0.0008	0.0074

FTSE GLOBAL INDICES

Company Name Petra Diamonds Ltd

3.53	Industrials
3.42	Media
6.78	Beverages
6.75	Financials
7.05	Financials ex Inv Co.
7.01	Retailers
6.04	Utilities
3.24	Travel & Leisure
7.39	Gas Water & Multi-utilities
7.39	Food Producers
6.32	Industrial Engineering
6.25	Biotechnology
4.98	Consumer Services
3.48	Consumer Staples
1.46	Real Estate Investment Trusts
1.32	Consumer Discretionary
0.57	Real Estate
0.38	Personal Care Drug & Grocery
0.33	Tobacco

Oct 07Regions & countries	No ofstocks	USSt�cs	Daily%Chg	Monthly%Chg	YTD%Chg	USTotalRet	YTDTotalRet	Gr DivYield
FTSE Global Industries
Global	10217	1261.34	-0.65	-1.25	12.62	2182.14	14.21	1.60
Global Large Cap	11742	1194.59	-0.50	-0.35	13.51	2126.46	15.04	1.47
Global US	2469	1402.42	-0.95	-3.38	10.92	2301.16	17.10	2.04
Global Small Cap	6015	14002.27	-1.26	-1.7	9.07	2177.36	10.69	1.85
Global ex Eurozone	9612	1343.69	-0.54	-0.78	13.50	2265.23	14.99	1.51
Global ex China	7601	4305.31	-0.65	-1.16	13.54	7069.58	15.12	1.58
Global ex EU	8972	898.22	-1.16	-4.27	10.86	1607.61	13.34	2.47
Global ex UK	9994	1339.86	-0.63	-1.11	12.93	2268.29	14.47	1.55
Global ex Japan	8867	1316.30	-0.64	-1.22	12.16	2294.52	13.69	1.57
FTSE Regional Industries
Americas	1987	1765.36	-0.42	0.32	13.44	2750.46	14.52	1.18
Asia Pacific	8429	932.23	-0.74	-2.24	19.71	1681.05	21.97	2.01
Asia Pacific ex Japan	5079	1166.51	-0.73	-2.47	19.43	2327.53	21.58	2.02
Europe	1435	667.60	-1.56	-6.72	1.68	1437.51	4.41	4.92
Eurozone ex UK	1212	769.44	-1.85	-7.02	1.20	1600.41	3.22	2.84
Eurozone	605	693.93	-2.06	-7.17	1.81	1479.94	4.44	2.82
Asian	401	739.52	-0.97	-5.16	4.79	649.00	8.64	4.61
FTSE Developed Industries
Developed	5369	1309.19	0.65	-1.19	12.91	2238.15	14.42	1.51
Developed ex North America	3607	755.72	-1.29	4.95	11.74	1527.80	14.41	2.54
Oct 07Sector	No ofstocks	USSt�cs	Daily%Chg	Monthly%Chg	YTD%Chg	USTotalRet	YTDTotalRet	Gr DivYield

Event Rights Issue: 10 for 17 at 16.5p p.s., payable in full by Nov. 21 (xr 07.11.25).

Digital Information Services
Software & Computer Svcs	527	3735.43	-0.43	4.88	4.04	4548.07	4.54 0.54
Technology	153	775.28	1.11	-5.09	-14.84	1115.60	-14.19 1.09
Semiconductors	300	980.87	-0.47	6.47	57.25	1074.40	57.94 0.52
Tech Hardware & Equip	765	7491.00	6.10	6.10	54.46	10670.51	55.12 0.52
Technology	252	5250.57	-0.40	5.95	30.95	6887.44	31.54 0.53
Biotechnology	216	122.62	-0.42	-2.25	15.58	125.25	15.95 0.29
Telecommunications Equip	112	591.34	-0.77	3.23	76.88	684.39	78.33 0.75
Telecommunications S/O	257	259.38	-0.46	-0.52	35.15	1794.85	37.68 1.69
Telecommunications Svcs Providers	145	437.77	0.00	-5.39	-0.16	979.85	2.91 3.60
Electronic & Electrical Equip	361	2123.21	-2.22	-0.31	24.40	3065.48	25.55 0.93
Financials
Finance & Credit Services	111	827.64	-0.66	-11.38	-16.48	1298.66	-15.38 1.58
Financials	1160	688.36	-1.48	-7.64	4.17	1440.02	6.85 2.89
Life Insurance	71	636.50	-1.16	-6.61	7.04	1335.08	10.47 3.44
Banks	497	509.20	-2.04	-7.68	9.15	1189.78	12.37 3.41
Mortgage Real Estate Inv Tsts	7	79.47	-0.30	-20.48	24.22	190.77	-16.41 16.18
Nonlife Insurance	125	1023.86	-0.56	-6.99	-0.92	1852.66	2.20 2.78
Inv Banking & Brokerage Svcs	349	1187.27	-0.91	-7.48	-0.41	1912.55	1.06 1.74
Transaction Processing Svcs	55	143.32	0.29	-3.86	-3.92	150.41	-3.26 0.86
Real Estate
Real Estate	642	872.46	-0.98	-7.33	-4.40	1071.31	-1.50 4.03
Real Estate Inv & Svcs	319	321.73	-0.50	-7.95	-15.19	663.27	-13.17 2.95
Real Estate Investment Totals	323	518.84	-1.13	-7.13	-0.37	1431.69	2.86 4.37
Housewares & Services
Consumer Digital Services	94	338.72	-0.30	5.31	4.32	343.61	4.60 0.32
Consumer Discretionary	1485	1166.95	-0.08	-3.49	-6.84	1696.58	-5.91 1.26
Consumer Services	70	1325.34	0.02	-5.58	-8.74	1809.23	-8.09 0.91
Consumer Diaples	612	956.98	0.02	-3.72	0.97	1769.94	3.59 1.16
Retailers	263	1917.95	0.50	-1.60	1.22	2641.65	1.87 0.83
Pers Care Drug & Grocery Strs	196	547.28	0.10	-3.62	-1.69	918.64	0.39 2.61
Personal Goods	138	730.15	-0.47	-8.39	-20.82	1136.35	-19.43 2.25
Travel & Leisure	153	633.93	-0.46	-3.37	-2.27	1099.44	-0.59 1.48
Travel & Leisure	290	1087.99	-0.84	-7.50	-10.04	1607.63	-8.90 1.75

Effective 07.11.2025

7.11	Industrial Support Services	-4.74
5.13	Precious Metals & Mining	-5.32
5.10	Finance & Credit Services	-8.25
5.02	Life Insurance	-8.42
3.80	Real Estate Investment & Svcs.	-7.48
3.37	Consumer Digital Services	-8.41
2.60	Technology	-8.61
1.42	Software & Computer Svcs.	-8.96
-0.44	Personal Goods	-8.25
-0.58	Investment Banking & Brokerage	-9.46
-1.62	Pharmaceuticals & Biotech	-10.90
-1.83
-2.00	Health Care	-11.06
-2.11	Leisure Goods	-14.25
-2.81	Medical Equipment & Svcs	-16.81
-2.86	Hardware & Home Const	-26.20

Oct 07Regions & countries	No ofstocks	US$/ Indices	DailyChg%	MonthChg%	YTD% Chg%	US$/ TotalRet	YTD% TotalRet	Gr DivYield
Developed ex Canada	5152	13163.63	-0.61	-0.99	13.14	2245.13	14.64	1.48
Developed ex Europe	4156	1546.94	-0.50	-0.22	15.06	2454.98	16.31	1.27
Developed ex Eurozone	4764	1409.53	-0.53	-0.68	13.94	2337.82	15.34	1.40
Developed ex US	3824	784.04	-1.36	-5.17	11.13	1573.47	13.71	2.50
Developed ex UK	5146	1409.48	-0.63	-1.03	13.27	2335.93	15.73	1.45
Developed ex Japan	4019	1377.35	-0.64	-1.16	12.41	2371.92	13.86	1.47
Developed Asia Pacific	2301	863.61	-0.93	-2.82	26.89	1558.97	29.45	2.10
Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan$1	1128	1126.65	-1.13	-4.14	36.04	2486.06	38.73	2.23
Developed Europe	1212	684.12	-1.55	-6.62	1.61	1472.99	4.34	1.92
Developed ex Eurozone ex UK	996	684.21	-1.84	-5.09	1.09	1661.46	3.62	2.08
Developed Eurozone	605	689.35	-2.06	-7.19	1.60	1470.02	4.23	2.82
Developed Asia Pacific 3514	3514	757.63	1.27	-4.91	11.74	1532.41	14.63	2.54
FTSE Emerging Indices
Emerging	4848	1093.87	-0.64	-1.77	10.13	2129.46	12.37	2.40
Emerging Asia Pacific	4128	1231.12	-0.48	-1.44	11.21	2254.02	13.11	1.89
Emerging Europe	222	317.80	-2.38	-15.09	2.80	723.51	5.45	3.04
Emerging Plus Korea	5289	4388.21	-0.86	-1.85	19.83	8047.34	21.98	2.10
Emerging Europe ex Poland/CEU	3757	1356.56	-0.94	-1.21	23.85	8659.88	23.97	2.30
Advanced Emerging	1198	1597.57	-0.53	-1.89	46.62	3482.64	49.78	2.41
Secondary Emerging	3650	962.56	-0.75	-5.28	-12.53	1706.86	-11.24	2.39

UK COMPANY RESULTS

Oct 07Sector	No of stocks	US$ Indices	Daily %Chg	Month %Chg	YTD %Chg	US$ TotalRet	YTD %TotalRet	Gr Div Yield
Hlhold Goods & Home Const	119	501.00	-2.07	-6.42	-6.69	863.61	-5.05	2.40
Tobacco	13	1370.15	1.20	2.24	11.05	4378.99	14.90	4.56
Health Care
Health Care	843	1168.19	0.78	-2.27	5.12	1847.04	6.65	1.61
Health Care Providers	114	1777.56	-0.02	-2.50	9.10	2272.06	10.47	1.57
Medical Chemicals & Biotech	531	1031.20	1.16	-2.64	10.17	1786.45	12.04	1.81
Medical Equipment & Vnc	198	1651.29	-0.01	-0.95	-9.06	2026.63	-8.30	1.01
Agricultural Food & Beverages
Food Producers	300	609.38	-0.10	-6.18	-3.23	1096.15	-0.48	3.32
Beverages	103	924.77	-0.66	-4.69	4.15	1485.15	6.41	3.04
Energy
Energy	376	700.27	-0.65	-1.98	30.89	1521.71	34.11	3.00
Electricity	252	645.14	-0.33	-3.36	-0.50	1521.76	1.71	2.96
Alternative Energy	90	98.47	-1.20	-3.67	4.38	120.51	6.65	3.58
Personal Energy	69	368.69	-2.67	-8.59	-1.44	285.32	-1.12	0.41
Oil Gas & Coal	307	728.72	-0.55	-1.64	32.96	1649.12	36.43	3.13
Gas Water & Multi-Utilities	119	679.53	-0.76	-4.43	-0.02	1719.03	2.81	3.70
Utilities	412	670.70	-0.41	-3.73	-0.49	1606.63	1.82	3.05
Transportation
Austines & Parts	299	1048.14	-0.86	-1.82	-13.80	1728.01	-12.61	1.55
Industrial Transportation	384	1345.41	-1.34	-6.13	7.38	2354.72	9.52	2.40
Industrials
Aerospace & Defense	106	2683.36	-2.32	-8.81	-5.38	4103.16	-4.67	1.22
Industrial Engineering	347	2341.49	-2.77	-2.34	19.98	3720.19	21.29	1.26
Industrial Materials	92	272.37	-1.11	-5.52	-2.09	541.16	-0.19	2.96
Industrial Metals & Mining	388	1063.32	-1.94	-7.64	17.01	2127.29	19.29	2.37
Industrial Support Services	232	2563.68	0.06	-3.97	-2.45	1842.07	-1.32	1.35
Industrials	2103	1518.82	-1.69	-4.29	5.96	2431.30	7.28	1.49
General Industrials	202	940.31	-1.84	-2.10	14.97	1690.91	16.63	1.62
Resources & Materials
Basic Materials	1035	1021.37	-1.60	-7.41	11.41	1904.73	13.49	2.19
Chemicals	457	1076.54	-0.60	-1.72	16.40	1938.27	18.63	2.10
Construction & Materials	471	1355.23	-2.18	-5.80	-4.14	2255.32	-2.75	1.38
Waste & Disposal Services	41	403.23	0.27	-4.10	-2.03	445.76	-0.95	1.32
Precious Metals & Mining	98	1396.53	-2.55	-14.73	-1.72	2487.29	-0.16	1.86

Company	Turnover(£)
Ashoka India Equity Inv Trust*	Fin - (-)
Ensilica*	Fin 27.8m (18.2m)
Fidelity Emerging Markets $*	Fin - (-)
Maven Renovar VCT*	Int - (-)
Netcall*	Fin 57.7m (48.0m)
Next 15 Group	Int 299.4m (316.1m)
PXN Growth*	Int - (-)
Schroder Japan Trust*	Fin - (-)
Tesco	Int 37.4bn (36.0bn)
Volution Grp	Fin 484.8m (419.1m)

FTSE 100 SUMMARY

	Close (p)	%Chg
3i Group	2352.00	-1.63
Aberdeen Group	237.00	1.11
Admiral	3634.00	-0.28
Airtel Africa	309.60	-1.02
Alliance Witan	1397.00	-0.36
Anglo American	4040.00	-0.47
Antofagasta	3605.00	-2.36
Assoc. Brit. Foods	1834.00	0.38
AstraZeneca	11892.00	-2.36
Autototrader Group	485.90	3.21
Aviva	672.80	-0.68
Babcock Intl	904.60	1.53
BAE Systems	1836.50	0.57
Balfour Beatty	866.00	-0.97
Barclays	426.15	-1.37
Barnett Redrow	291.40	-2.90
BP	584.80	4.06
Brit. Amer. Tobacco	4161.00	1.89
British Land	384.80	-1.64
BT Group	197.45	-0.50
Bunzl	2710.00	2.26
Burberry	1007.00	-0.89
Centrica	147.00	0.82
Coca-Cola Europec	7785.00	1.10
Coca-Cola HBC AG	4254.00	0.14
Compass	2324.88	0.76
Computacenter	5485.00	0.64
Convatec	213.00	-1.70
Croda International	3344.00	0.18
DCC Energy	6445.00	0.08
Diageo	1622.00	0.68
Diploma	7750.00	0.65
easyJet	681.00	0.21
Endeavour Mining	4073.00	-0.76
Experian	2574.00	1.22
F&C Inv Trust	348.40	0.06
Fresnillo	2688.00	0.04
Games Works	16350.00	-1.15
Glencore	568.70	-0.04
GSK	1735.50	-3.07
Haleon	344.30	0.55
Halma	3500.00	-0.05
Hiscox	1822.00	-0.65
Howden Joinery	748.00	-0.86
HSBC	1380.60	-1.95
ICG	1735.00	-1.64
IG Group	963.00	1.37
IMI	3032.00	-0.66
Imperial Brands	2614.00	5.06
Informa	891.00	2.82

	Close (p)	%Chg
InterCont'l Hotels	11807.90	-1.71
Intl Cons Airlines	420.00	-2.96
Intersk Group	5890.00	-0.17
Investec	588.50	-1.09
Ithaca Energy	279.60	1.82
JD Sports Fashion	84.02	0.62
Kingfisher	322.40	-2.04
Land Securities	601.00	-1.88
Legal & General	285.50	-0.90
Lion Finance	12370.00	-3.59
Lloyds Big Gp	100.60	-1.66
LondonMetric Prop	172.00	-0.23
Lon Stock Ex	8470.00	1.85
M&G	304.40	-1.17
Marks & Spen	396.10	0.10
Melrose Intl	438.30	-2.60
Metlen Energy	4048.81	-2.54
Natl Grid	1152.50	0.22
NatWest Group	639.80	-1.54
Next	14455.00	-0.82
Pearson	1266.50	1.89
Pershing Square Hldgs	3734.00	-0.43
Polar CapTech	705.50	-0.91
Prudential	887.60	0.75
Reckitt Benckiser	5072.00	-0.67
RELX	2595.00	-0.15
Rentokil Initial	301.40	1.17
Rio Tinto	7022.00	-1.00
Rolls-Royce	1367.00	-2.66
Sainsbury UJ	332.40	1.47
Scot Mort Inv Tst	1623.00	-0.18
Segro	908.00	-0.61
Severn Trent	3096.00	1.24
Shell	3780.50	3.63
Smith & Nephew	1003.50	-1.52
Smiths Gp	2710.00	-1.88
Sprax Group	7015.00	-1.75
SSE	2437.00	-0.89
Standard Chartered	2108.00	-2.00
Standard Life	838.50	-3.79
St James's Place	1020.00	-0.68
Tesco	500.40	5.41
The Sage Grp	1027.50	0.54
Tritax Big Box	138.90	-1.91
Unilever	4626.00	0.06
Utd. Utilities	1416.00	1.29
Vodafone	124.40	-2.62
Weir	2538.00	-0.86
Whitbread	2445.00	-1.09
WPP	372.30	-3.30

UK RECENT STOCK ADDITIONS

	Close (p)	%Chg		Close (p)	%Chg
1947 Oil & Gas	9.60	1.05	iForex Financial	145.00	-
Avimia	141.00	-	Mendell Helium	3.90	-1.27
ATC Music Grp	187.50	-	Meridian Mining	122.00	-1.61
Braware Solutions	164.50	-	Pathos Comms	25.50	-
Chaleit Holdings	69.00	20.00	Rift Helium	6.40	-
Coastal Africa Group	200.00	-	Serval Resources	30.50	-
Comish Metals	104.00	-0.95	Sintana Energy	21.00	-
Dauch Corp	428.00	0.47	Sunbelt Rentals	5624.00	-0.50
EDX Medical Group	7.50	-14.29	Tapir Holdings	44.00	-
Halo Minerals	8.25	-	The Smarter Web Co	60.69	-10.09

United Kingdom (USD)
FT GLOBAL 500: THE WORLD'S LARGEST COMPANIES

Stock	52 Week
	Price	+/Chg	High	Low	Yld	P/E	MV (lb)
Australia (AUD)
ANZ Group Holdings	37.95	0.09	41.00	33.36	5.73	19.49	114.45
BHP Group	62.45	-0.41	68.77	40.17	3.87	32.26	317.51
Commonwealth Bank	150.37	-2.01	185.59	146.98	3.36	23.04	251.64
CSL Ltd	181.99	3.31	222.47	90.00	2.23	28.30	87.33
Macquarie Group	248.77	-1.25	267.90	187.31	3.24	25.41	95.44
National Australia Bank	38.40	-0.30	49.45	35.48	4.43	17.38	119.71
Westfarmers	76.30	0.44	94.70	70.80	2.91	30.11	86.62
Westpac Banking	34.24	-0.42	43.32	33.46	4.50	17.04	117.11
Belgium (EUR)

Aténeuser-busch indev	67,34	-0,22	76,18	50,10	1,20	25,41	121,02
Brazil (BRL)
Itau Unibanco Holding	53,15	-1,71	55,43	32,50	0,00	0,00	298,58
Itau Unibanco Holding Prfd	49,11	-1,34	50,85	36,96	0,00	0,00	265,64
Petroleo Brasileiro	60,05	0,74	62,00	30,96	0,00	53,22	446,91
Petroleo Brasileiro Prfd	54,33	0,51	56,75	29,31	0,00	0,00	295,91
Vale	68,75	-1,62	91,62	58,75	0,00	77,46	292,58
Canada ($AP)

Stock	Price	52 Week
		+/-Chg	High	Low	Yld	P/E
Finland (EUR)
Nordex Bank Abp	16.82	-0.24	18.11	13.76	0.00	12.10
France (EUR)
Air Liquide	168.62	-0.48	189.80	154.86	1.99	32.31
Aarhus	187.44	-0.56	221.30	157.42	1.71	34.97
AAA	42.03	-0.74	45.66	36.55	5.52	11.71
BNP Paribas A	91.40	-3.69	113.82	65.12	8.35	9.55
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain	64.76	-2.38	91.56	65.66	3.55	9.67
Credit Agricole	16.52	-0.59	20.40	15.37	0.00	7.58
Doverne	58.78	-0.04	60.14	57.26	3.83	22.70
Dassault Synthons	21.61	0.10	30.36	15.82	1.25	24.01
ENSE	22.74	-0.71	29.89	18.18	4.53	14.96
EnelIndustrials	146.65	-0.05	323.90	138.30	2.73	28.20
Hermes International	1280.00	-2.00	2300.00	1260.00	1.41	29.14
Llreal	374.40	0.80	405.80	338.85	1.92	29.46
LMVMI Met Hennessy	388.45	2.85	654.70	376.00	3.35	17.77
Safran	319.40	-10.00	366.50	262.60	1.05	42.03
Sorfixi	71.81	1.20	91.15	69.75	5.74	9.17
Schneider Electric	254.55	-5.95	312.30	220.40	1.65	29.63
TotalEnergies	75.42	-0.30	81.34	49.24	4.64	10.95
VNCI	108.00	-1.25	143.15	104.25	4.68	12.49

Argopec Eagle Mines	257.21	-7.39	348.94	188.48	1.00	21.95	131.04
Amerization-Cuze Ford-Tam	77.11	-0.05	95.15	68.30	1.12	26.50	70.78
Bank of Montreal	230.72	-5.48	259.20	168.92	2.96	26.25	160.31
Bank of Nova Scotia	124.29	-3.95	134.50	88.22	3.67	25.57	153.05
Brookfield	52.71	-0.27	95.94	50.85	0.76	94.12	117.66
Brookfield Asset Mgmt	63.51	-0.78	82.98	58.09	4.51	36.29	101.44
Canadian Imperial Bank	154.57	-4.08	172.87	111.45	2.77	20.64	140.34
Canadian National Railway	164.99	-3.35	185.25	126.05	2.22	29.05	99.67
Canadian Natural	67.80	-0.68	72.35	41.67	3.69	16.54	139.77
Canadian Pacific Airways	119.18	-2.26	133.38	96.50	0.83	37.83	104.77
Constellation Software	2801.98	-48.66	4081.71	2198.00	0.20	971.10	611.50
Enbridge	65.43	-0.77	80.65	62.42	5.93	34.26	148.38
Royal Dutch Shell Financial	163.89	-6.23	183.85	109.00	2.46	16.89	109.00
Royal Bank of Canada	272.82	-6.37	306.38	200.82	2.58	24.78	379.16
Shopify Inc.	236.59	2.86	253.10	129.01	0.00	158.78	285.94
Suncor Energy	97.26	0.21	100.24	53.02	2.47	25.39	113.76
TC Energy	84.00	-1.57	100.18	69.41	4.18	33.60	84.00
The Toronto-Dominion Bank	162.43	-5.63	175.33	109.50	2.71	19.66	274.42
Waste Connections	221.28	1.59	251.45	203.46	0.90	53.32	55.77

Germany (EUR)
adidas AG	146.75	1.60	196.40	129.95	1.91	19.67
Allianz	417.30	-3.40	454.60	338.80	4.10	14.59
BASF	51.18	0.10	55.05	41.48	4.40	28.12
BMW	53.66	-0.98	97.92	52.36	8.20	4.51
Deutsche Bank	29.86	-1.55	35.84	23.82	3.35	9.45
Deutsche Bors	292.20	-3.10	298.90	200.10	1.44	44.34
Deutsche Telekom AG	28.99	0.58	34.36	23.53	3.71	13.70
DHL Group	56.95	-0.55	58.90	39.37	3.47	17.98
Deutschland Technologique	60.95	-3.73	88.83	31.27	0.57	79.16
Mercedes-Benz Group	39.83	-0.67	62.34	39.41	8.79	3.91
Merck	140.15	1.15	148.80	100.70	1.57	21.93
Muenchenke Ranch	516.60	4.60	575.60	437.40	4.65	24.67
Porsche	42.67	0.14	50.66	35.62	2.37	10.80
Rheinmetall	929.20	-26.80	1966.00	900.20	1.24	56.10
SAP	187.62	-0.98	244.30	127.50	1.33	30.56
Siemens	271.20	-7.80	291.70	198.00	1.97	25.75
Siemens Energy	143.60	-3.84	191.66	94.40	0.49	227.94
Siemens Healthineers	38.56	0.49	49.71	32.81	2.59	20.19
Volkswagen	70.05	1.10	110.20	67.50	7.42	5.27
Volkswagen Privat	69.74	0.86	109.15	67.02	7.54	5.25

Kuwait Finance House	0.77	0.00	0.85	0.77	3.12	23.09	15.20
Mexico (MXN)
America Movil B	20.15	0.03	24.49	17.48	2.68	0.00	1253.03
Wal-Mart de Mexico	46.76	0.12	63.97	44.80	2.48	0.00	815.79
Netherlands (EUR)
Adyen	867.20	0.20	1600.80	772.40	0.00	47.62	27.49
ASML Holding	1610.20	-26.20	1741.00	812.60	0.48	80.87	625.00
Heineken	70.46	0.22	80.44	63.90	2.72	15.12	39.84
ING Groep	30.24	-0.89	32.40	20.23	3.76	15.27	86.89
Prosus N	35.30	-0.27	63.94	34.48	0.79	6.67	77.18
The Magnum Ice Cream Co	15.21	-0.22	17.68	11.02	0.00	31.68	9.31
Universal Music Group NV	14.36	0.07	24.53	13.92	3.62	33.38	26.39
Norway (NOK)

Agricultural Bank China A	6.97	8.68	5.79	3.72	8.94	22.25
Bank of China A	6.73	6.79	5.13	3.51	9.09	16.06
Bank of Communications A	7.75	7.77	6.37	4.34	7.18	448.77
China Construction Bank A	11.06	11.23	8.50	3.65	8.51	234.28
China Life Insurance A	36.70	51.92	32.32	2.66	6.73	764.22
China Merchants Bank A	41.26	43.79	35.28	4.89	7.24	851.15
China Petroleum Chemical A	5.28	8.11	4.43	4.11	20.15	512.36
China Shenhua Energy A	47.80	51.18	38.27	4.21	17.97	875.31
China Yangtze Power A	28.54	29.57	25.38	3.50	20.24	698.32
OTIC Securities A	25.86	30.63	23.77	3.24	13.19	315.50
Cont Amheres Tech A	291.11	468.75	285.74	1.23	18.04	1283.49
East Money Information A	17.79	27.08	17.22	0.56	23.25	281.48
Fascariot India Internet A	58.20	84.95	47.35	1.68	32.70	1154.93
IDBC A	8.28	8.40	6.85	3.86	8.28	2.23
Industrial Bank A	18.05	21.90	16.44	5.91	5.22	381.99
Jiangsu Hengsu Pharma A	47.20	71.00	57.00	4.77	37.50	301.31
Kweichan Mechat A	1258.62	1568.00	1151.01	4.13	19.17	15733.38
Luxshare Precision Food A	49.43	81.78	44.57	0.50	21.59	362.91
Middle Group A	80.10	89.50	71.02	5.37	13.81	557.70
PetrolChina A	11.21	13.69	8.04	4.55	13.03	1.82
Ping An Insurance Group A	53.29	74.88	46.90	5.12	9.94	568.07
Postal Savings Bank China A	5.46	6.13	4.76	4.18	7.48	5.47
Shenzhen Mind Bio-Med A	163.32	248.98	130.66	2.63	24.02	195.49
Wulingye Ybn A	70.06	122.96	68.68	7.36	30.37	271.95
Zijin Mining Group A	29.79	44.94	24.42	2.69	15.28	613.73

Stock	Price	+/-Chg	High	Low	Yld	P/E	MV (bl)
Shin-Etsu Chemical	6234.00	-87.00	7930.00	4366.00	2.18	24.67	12374.46
SoftBank	240.70	1.10	252.90	202.60	3.66	21.21	11565.92
SoftBank Group	6310.00	15.00	27695.00	3365.00	0.17	7.22	36041.76
Sony Financial Group	148.80	-0.50	180.40	129.30	5.38	18.89	1007.43
Sony Group	3743.00	-25.00	4776.00	3643.00	0.94	68.43	22328.18
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial	3372.00	-57.00	7260.00	3300.00	2.67	16.37	25634.79
Takeda Pharmaceutical	5766.00	47.00	6033.00	4102.00	3.54	59.60	9237.95
Tokio Marine Holdings	516.00	-6.30	8468.00	501.00	3.17	27.71	14698.16
Tokyo Electron	12500.00	-305.00	81260.00	11270.00	1.27	49.82	25625.02
Toyota Motor	2900.50	-30.00	4000.00	2666.00	3.45	9.82	42332.76

Equinor Republic of Korea (KRW)	403.50	-6.50	426.00	226.40	3.65	207.99	964.67
LG Energy Solution	391000.00	1000.00	527000.00	296500.00	0.00	85.28	91494.00
SAMSUNG BIOLOGICS	1277000.00	-33000.00	1987000.00	1003000.00	0.00	53.37	59113.54
Samsung Electronics	266500.00	-3500.00	374500.00	90200.00	0.63	40.65	0.00
Samsung Electronics Pref	198000.00	-200.00	243500.00	70400.00	0.85	187.22	158889.50
Samsung Epis	368000.00	-2500.00	773000.00	324500.00	0.00	292.16	9181.85
SK hyrix	1723000.00	-50000.00	2987000.00	403000.00	0.17	27.77	0.00

BioNTechHong Kong (HKD)	95.25	-0.48	124.00	79.52	0.00	45.57	24.09
AIA Group	68.80		92.15	68.00	2.88	116.41	711.85
HKEX	379.00	-1.00	460.20	360.00	3.68	26.98	480.51

Saudi Arabia (SAN)
ACWA Power	171.10	-4.40	252.60	154.50	0.27	69.27	131.15
Al Rajhi Bank	63.20	-0.55	110.00	62.00	4.76	16.21	379.20
Saudi Arabian Mining	63.00	-0.85	79.90	54.90	0.00	32.98	244.99
Saudi Arabian Oil	25.84	0.04	27.96	23.29	5.25	17.94	62.53
Saudi Basic Industries	46.56	-0.08	62.50	45.70	5.58	5.42	139.68
Saudi National Bank	39.08	0.06	45.24	36.00	5.89	9.67	234.48
STC Co	43.00	0.20	45.38	41.14	5.12	14.48	215.00

India (UNIV)
Bajra Finance	964.10	2.30	1177.60	788.40	0.62	50.60	6002.45
Brah Amrit Ltd	1833.00	24.00	2174.70	1728.05	1.31	140.03	11438.84
HCL Technologies	1183.80	-18.30	1770.00	1030.00	5.07	18.45	3212.44
HEPC Bank	703.80	-6.40	1023.05	682.00	1.85	14.22	10851.61
Hindustan Unilever	1868.00	-24.10	2667.55	1827.10	2.19	42.71	4385.04
ICICI Bank	1357.00	15.40	1473.90	1187.55	0.88	21.47	7411.56
Infosys	992.10	-20.90	1737.85	980.30	4.84	15.38	4028.22
Lfd Ltd	285.30	-1.20	435.60	254.75	5.47	9.55	3234.25
Kohl Mahindra Bank	1468.00	-9.55	435.50	305.75	0.15	-	-
Lancor & Todso	3699.00	-74.00	4440.00	3288.65	1.03	31.63	5099.44
Life Insurance Corp	386.10	-3.90	936.60	385.25	2.59	13.57	4848.16
Maruti Suzuki India	11489.85	-113.15	17371.60	11304.30	1.22	24.61	3612.44
Reliance Industries	1206.65	-12.25	1611.20	1161.00	0.50	23.44	16329.04
State Bank of India	952.80	-4.45	1234.80	857.30	1.82	10.96	8795.07
Sun Pharmaceutical Inds	1783.25	-17.75	2047.55	1586.60	0.90	39.11	4278.51
Tata Consultancy Svs	2084.00	-14.00	3336.70	1976.00	3.12	15.53	7540.09

Agricultural Bank China	H.58	0.03	6.71	5.05	4.62	8.43	202.11
Alibaba Group Holding	105.40	-2.80	179.00	88.65	0.98	126.99	2097.67
Bank of China	5.99	-0.03	6.14	4.11	4.61	8.09	500.48
Bank of Communications	8.21	-0.03	8.38	6.33	4.80	7.60	297.27
BPO	74.55	-0.45	113.40	71.40	0.55	20.82	274.60
China CITIC Bank	8.26	-0.01	8.70	6.50	5.61	6.88	122.93
China Construction Bank H	9.63	-0.02	9.90	7.18	4.91	7.41	23.15
China Life Insurance	27.26	-0.04	36.16	20.90	4.13	5.00	202.85
China Merchants Bank H	50.95	-0.05	53.70	43.34	4.46	8.94	233.91
China Petroleum Chemical H	4.42	0.03	5.70	3.98	5.68	16.87	104.65
China Shenhua Energy H	43.24	0.06	49.62	37.54	5.37	15.84	146.04
CITIC Securities H	24.00	-0.02	32.50	23.24	4.08	12.24	82.17
ICBC H	7.58		7.77	5.56	4.94	7.58	657.90
JD.com A	104.90	1.30	137.20	95.80	3.74	15.22	261.88
Meituan B	70.15	-0.65	108.00	63.65	0.00	18.27	392.58
Middle Group H	90.45	-0.35	101.70	77.65	5.56	15.59	58.87
NetEase	188.50	2.90	244.80	168.80	2.44	17.80	605.47
Nungfu Spring H	39.76	0.40	56.25	37.90	2.84	28.18	200.18
PetrolChina H	9.59	-0.09	12.22	7.05	6.13	11.15	202.23
Ping An Insurance Group H	51.50	-0.05	74.70	50.00	6.11	6.71	383.55
Prestat Savings Bank China H	5.37	-0.01	5.78	4.48	4.98	7.35	106.53
Tencent Holdings	420.60	-7.60	681.00	411.00	1.26	16.99	3824.35
Xiaomi Corp B	23.94	-0.32	54.70	21.30	0.00	14.78	511.49
Zijin Mining Group H	32.36	-0.22	46.98	26.58	2.85	16.59	193.80
US$ (USD)
Full Truck Alliance	8.35	-0.09	14.02	7.46	2.77	278.33	155.73
Fidis Holdings A	109.68	-3.53	202.53	80.50	2.32	10.50	84.02
Hindi Holdings A	78.50	0.10	139.41	71.94	0.00	31.40	445.77

Singapore (SGD)
DBS Group Holdings	77.49	-1.07	79.05	51.80	4.10	20.18	220.38
Overseas-Chinese Banking	30.30	-1.90	32.57	16.62	3.47	1858.90	136.81
United Overseas Bank Ltd	42.44	-1.28	45.15	33.25	3.75	15.38	70.54
Singapore (USD)
JOYY A	81.33	0.68	81.35	54.24	6.62	325.32	53.11
Sea /Singapore A	94.66	-1.87	193.48	77.05	0.00	35.72	51.73

Indonesia (EUR)
Bank Central Asia	6050.00	-50.00	6750.00	4820.00	0.00	12.96	7458.14
PT Bantu Renewables	2850.00	70.00	10725.00	2300.00	0.14	0.00	812.91
Italy (EUR)
Aloisurazioni Generali	41.62	-0.58	46.24	31.76	3.94	17.13	63.87
Enel	8.73	-0.11	10.31	8.11	5.62	23.58	86.72
Eni	24.23	0.10	25.02	14.54	4.54	17.19	73.38
Ferrari	345.15	-0.10	428.50	269.00	0.87	49.95	61.19
Intesa Sanpaolo	6.24	-0.26	6.94	4.81	6.02	27.15	110.41
Stellantis	4.12	0.06	10.49	3.61	0.00	5.54	11.95
UniCredit SpA	77.72	-3.39	86.42	57.36	4.05	15.22	121.37

Canon	4619.00	-24.00	5032.00	3987.00	3.46	15.55	6160.55
Chagas Pharmaceutical	6110.00	-19.00	10700.00	5591.00	2.16	23.13	10242.93
Caterpillar	2732.50	-87.50	4178.00	2296.00	3.70	17.08	5264.47
FAST RETAILING	74780.00	-810.00	86690.00	64580.00	0.86	22.98	12376.56
Hiscox	5648.00	-11.00	6035.00	4222.00	0.99	42.20	25621.38
Honda Motor	1063.50	-4.00	1766.50	1238.00	4.16	15.87	7621.31
HOYA	2515.00	-105.00	3040.00	2104.00	1.15	33.78	8416.15
ITOCOJ	2161.50	-21.50	9959.00	1882.00	2.04	16.89	17128.69
Japan Tobacco	6950.00	-54.00	7218.00	4836.00	3.89	24.32	13960.00
KDDI	2977.00	-6.00	3121.00	2329.00	2.92	15.67	11529.44
Kayacor	8150.00	-70.00	6730.00	51510.00	0.67	44.45	18060.02
Mitsubishi	4876.00	-37.00	6012.00	3483.00	2.67	22.17	11730.43
Mitsubishi Heavy Corp	3911.00	-24.00	5336.00	3464.00	0.78	38.55	12856.57
Mitsubishi U.S. Finl Grp	3622.00	-49.00	3813.00	2235.50	3.65	16.98	42984.85
Mizuho Financiero	4587.00	-14.00	4657.00	3465.00	1.74	17.19	21155.84
Micronu Financial Group	8644.00	-213.00	8983.00	4560.00	1.74	21.15	11519.84
Nintendo	7775.00	-40.00	14363.00	6544.00	2.08	21.33	10008.45
NTT	172.10	2.00	180.10	142.60	3.14	13.65	15560.71
Recruit Holdings	17000.00	25.00	18215.00	6040.00	0.15	48.60	25620.57

Naspers N	708.91	1.04	1295.72	690.05	0.72	84.03	528.09
Spain (EUR)
Banco Santander	12.26	-0.26	13.12	8.10	1.66	13.47	178.46
BBVA Sporin	23.43	-0.85	25.57	15.39	3.35	90.12	129.12
CaixaBank	11.93	-0.43	13.55	8.57	3.40	35.07	83.19
Berdrolsa SA	20.93	-0.06	22.08	16.18	2.63	37.92	139.67
NxtExx	53.34	-0.48	59.42	46.07	2.66	120.95	166.24
Sweden (SEK)
Atlas Copco A	206.70	-6.70	214.10	149.45	1.45	38.07	694.01
Atlas Copco B	180.30	-5.20	186.05	134.00	1.66	33.20	281.43
EQT	279.50	-8.90	383.00	258.00	1.79	451.54	365.30
Investor B	407.50	-3.50	426.80	301.50	1.37	7.92	742.44
Volvo B	312.40	-2.60	374.50	244.90	4.16	18.44	497.56
Switzerland (CHF)
ABB	79.88	-2.70	89.14	53.78	1.18	30.84	145.63
Alcon	52.70	0.02	68.34	47.80	0.53	50.67	26.33
Civic Financiers Ricetomb	172.60	-2.25	202.20	127.20	1.91	36.81	92.79
Gravisden	3418.00	16.00	3592.00	2566.00	2.11	38.39	31.56
Holcim	83.68	-2.16	82.54	60.10	2.67	19.78	36.10
Lorsa Group	577.20	1.00	597.80	454.60	0.87	64.64	40.54
Nestle	75.56	0.36	87.09	70.29	4.10	21.53	194.68
Nestris	120.02	2.84	132.68	97.05	3.08	39.35	244.22
Roche Holding	368.80	9.60	383.00	270.80	2.66	22.79	38.35
Roche Holding Pref	360.00	10.20	375.80	291.00	2.72	22.25	252.92
Sika	173.75	-1.75	197.60	120.35	2.13	26.73	27.88
Swiss Re	143.75	0.70	153.85	114.05	4.38	11.02	42.95
UBS Group	39.33	-1.24	45.04	28.25	2.18	20.07	128.92
Zurich Insurance Group	573.00	-4.00	626.00	521.00	5.24	17.92	86.65

Hon Hai Precision	252.00	-4.00	314.00	187.50	2.85	18.52	3547.09
MediaTek	4835.00	-85.00	5480.00	1130.00	1.11	73.08	7759.95
Taiwan Semicon Mfg	2585.00		2590.00	1375.00	1.01	39.0167035.18
United Arab Emirates (AED)

Oilfield (US$)
3i Group Plc	23.52	-0.39	44.97	18.25	3.59	4.36	24.06
AstraZeneca	118.92	-2.88	157.32	98.92	2.01	23.83	184.45
BAE Systems	18.36	0.10	23.60	15.29	2.06	26.69	55.10
Barclays	4.26	-0.06	5.54	3.54	2.70	9.73	56.96
BP	5.85	0.23	6.09	3.99	4.29		91.85
British Amer Tobacco	41.61	0.77	53.26	36.77	5.89	11.85	89.76
Compass Group	23.25	0.18	25.81	20.00	2.18	27.93	39.53
Diageo	16.22	0.11	19.04	12.96	2.33	27.47	36.13
Experian	25.74	0.31	37.07	22.03	2.01	20.70	22.65
Glencore	5.69	-0.00	7.07	3.32	2.26		66.71

Stock	Price	+Chg	High	Low	Yld	P/E	MV (bl)
GSX	17.36	-0.55	22.82	15.92	4.03	12.30	74.91
Haleon	3.44	0.02	4.16	3.18	2.12	18.51	30.29
HSBC Holdings	13.81	-0.27	16.10	9.59	4.03	15.09	236.57
Lloyds Banking Group	1.01	-0.02	1.18	0.82	3.99	14.37	57.87
London Stock Exchange Grp	84.70	1.54	101.40	66.84	1.87	35.53	40.84
National Grid	11.53	0.03	14.29	10.86	4.21	17.60	57.94
NatWest Group	6.40	-0.10	7.26	5.04	5.47	11.96	50.75
Reckitt Benckiser Group	50.72	-0.34	65.23	36.64	4.27	10.83	32.15
RELX	25.95	-0.04	35.39	19.91	2.66	23.05	45.23
Rio Tinto	70.22		91.17	49.55	4.96	15.13	88.14
Rolls-Royce Holdings	13.67	-0.37	15.86	9.90	0.80	19.69	113.38
Shell	37.80	1.32	37.84	25.54	2.98	16.50	216.34
Unilever	46.26	0.03	55.42	36.44	3.57	12.61	99.66

INTEREST RATES: OFFICIAL
	Rate	Current	Since	Last
US	Fed Funds	3.75-4.00	16-09-2026	3.50-3.75
US	Prime	7.00	16-09-2026	6.75
US	Discount	4.00	16-09-2026	3.75
Euro	Repo	2.65	16-09-2026	2.40
UK	Repo	3.75	18-12-2025	4.00
Japan	O'night Call	1.25	18-09-2026	1.00
Switzerland	SNB	0.00	19-06-2025	0.25

COMMODITIES

Am Holdings	294.37	-8.19	452.70	100.02	0.00	346.32	313.21
United States (USD)
3M Co	162.12	-1.52	184.90	139.34	1.92	28.59	83.61
Abbott Laboratories	98.73	0.57	135.12	81.97	2.55	31.85	170.84
AbbVie	271.36	4.67	269.39	190.75	2.55	76.66	479.52
Accenture Plc A	196.64	3.24	291.09	118.15	3.48	15.57	120.33
Adobe	232.77	-5.35	363.70	190.12	0.00	12.98	90.59
Aflac	112.74	-0.89	130.22	105.43	2.16	12.11	56.52
Air Products & Chemicals	278.12	-2.88	314.87	229.11	2.60	29.31	61.93
Autiva A	160.63	0.24	193.45	110.81	0.00	42.83	67.39
Alphabet A	350.50	2.82	406.81	235.84	0.25	17.39	2056.73
Alphabet C	347.37	2.78	404.47	236.69	0.25	17.23	1591.91
Altia Group	69.38	0.83	77.06	54.70	6.40	14.48	115.85
Amazon.com	259.92	3.63	287.20	196.00	0.00	20.61	2803.58
AMG Electric	645.86	-3.56	658.52	168.22	0.00	162.69	1504.35
American Tower	100.00	-0.00	100.00	75.53	3.11	20.99	66.47
American Express	304.25	-0.30	387.45	290.82	0.46	14.76	114.46
American International	75.66	0.55	87.29	71.25	2.64	13.68	39.56
American Tower	166.18	1.40	196.08	160.06	4.25	22.80	77.43
Ameriprise Financial	490.56	-6.05	572.56	422.37	1.39	11.69	43.33
AMETEK Inc	249.62	-5.10	261.16	179.24	0.55	36.24	57.00
Avgen	413.08	10.48	447.03	288.00	2.44	25.47	223.32
Amphend A	87.55	-1.07	178.52	76.74	0.57	41.69	215.90
Analog Devices	410.08	-10.47	445.91	223.47	1.07	48.42	198.71
Asn Plc A	270.47	-3.52	382.34	266.33	1.21	14.84	57.37
Apollo Global Mgmt	115.55	-0.40	153.29	99.56	1.95	40.69	68.24
Apple	336.67	3.04	345.34	243.42	0.32	38.43	4913.42
Applied Materials Inc	520.65	-9.62	739.67	203.40	0.41	44.58	413.19
Agilent A	281.29	2.51	738.01	266.84	0.00	21.54	85.64
Aree Management	115.75	-1.99	161.19	95.80	4.87	53.10	25.92
Arthur J. Gallagher	227.10	-2.75	313.09	199.75	1.23	37.23	58.21
AT&T	24.47	0.04	29.43	19.89	4.54	8.08	167.68
Atlassian Corp A	195.79	1.81	200.00	56.01	0.00	92.33	31.13
Austark	235.05	3.77	324.00	185.50	0.00	30.25	49.13
Auto Data Processing	264.00	1.64	293.51	188.16	2.58	24.07	104.61
AutoZone	2846.27	-52.30	4170.00	2730.65	0.00	19.09	46.47
Baker Hughes A	55.41	-1.72	70.41	43.92	1.66	17.59	55.00
Bank of New York Mellon	142.72	-1.01	165.84	103.11	1.77	16.48	96.84
Becton Dickinson	180.16	-0.14	213.08	140.11	2.33	31.06	49.07
Berkshire Hathaway A	75990.00	174.00	86912.01	68600.00	0.00	85.35	84.38
Berkshire Hathaway B	538.25	0.71	537.74	464.01	0.00	19.52	70.88
BlackRock Finance	1089.63	-9.79	1219.94	917.39	2.14	25.24	165.65
Blackstone	111.83	-1.53	169.21	101.73	2.96	25.02	83.94
Blackstone A	76.07	-0.42	87.92	61.12	1.16	131.41	107.86
Boeing Co	198.32	-1.90	254.24	178.77	0.00	15.50	148.84
Boil Corp	53.52	-0.57	65.22	46.12	2.39	12.16	374.25
Booking Holdings	155.87	-1.76	5520.15	150.14	1.05	17.22	117.12
Boston Scientific	41.58	-0.61	105.65	41.94	0.00	16.70	60.26
Bristol Myers Squibb	59.70	0.11	68.64	42.52	4.22	13.09	121.95
Broadcom	376.51	0.70	495.00	289.96	0.69	46.66	1797.32
Cadence Design Systems	356.12	-3.43	416.69	262.75	0.00	70.38	98.07
Capital One Financial	195.91	0.09	258.63	174.24	1.63	10.79	120.19
Carrier Global	55.00	-1.10	76.76	50.24	1.75	38.73	45.34
Cavana A	62.76	-1.12	466.89	56.12	0.00	28.14	45.18
Carepillar	813.83	-49.61	1073.46	483.55	0.80	34.87	374.10
CROE Group A	127.56	-3.10	174.27	121.69	0.00	32.88	36.94
Cencora	317.25	0.88	377.54	244.82	0.76	23.45	60.54
Charter Comms A	106.96	-1.68	284.60	104.91	0.00	2.75	12.26
Cheniere Energy	272.28	-1.86	388.87	277.88	0.00	19.89	56.88
Chipotle mexican Engle	205.15	-2.43	217.78	146.49	3.47	19.69	405.33
Chipotle Mexican Grill	30.77	-0.13	42.81	28.04	0.00	28.23	38.94
Chubb	334.70	0.49	365.91	265.30	1.22	93.75	129.13
Cintas	197.19	1.23	219.16	161.16	1.05	39.68	79.01
Cisco Systems	117.39	-0.55	130.37	66.81	1.43	34.94	462.82
Citigroup	127.32	-1.20	147.96	93.66	2.10	17.91	213.57
Cloudflare Inc A	342.97	-12.04	370.35	158.83	0.00	591.33	110.65
CME Group A	270.27	0.09	329.16	218.31	4.18	22.81	97.18
Cognizant Tech Sci A	57.07	-0.15	87.03	37.08	2.31	12.19	25.71
Coinbase Global A	178.45	-7.29	402.16	139.11	0.00	46.11	39.76
Colgate-Palmolite	87.21	-0.04	95.33	74.55	2.43	34.33	69.52
Comcast A	20.94	-0.62	32.85	21.28	6.30	6.69	74.11
ConocoPhillips	129.84	0.49	141.62	85.57	2.59	17.17	155.98
Constellation Energy	298.59	-0.61	412.70	228.63	0.57	29.26	106.15
Constellation Srl	26.82	-0.20	45.89	28.64	0.00	17.06	24.69
Corning	163.25	-5.72	271.78	77.39	0.69	73.54	140.62
Corteva	14.45	0.54	90.97	11.74	4.98	8.76	9.64
Costco Wholesale	942.25	6.57	1086.50	844.06	0.62	47.33	417.67
Coupang A	14.81	0.39	32.70	13.35	0.00	34.44	24.28
CRH	81.46	-2.14	131.55	80.13	1.92	16.07	54.19
CrowdStrike Holdings A	265.44	-13.42	786.00	174.14	0.00	6636.80	271.79

Stock	Price	+/-Chg	52 Week				P/E	Mkt (bl)
			High	Low	Yld	P/E
Crown Castle	69.01	0.73	100.50	85.32	6.16	27.94	29.36
CSX	46.81	-0.69	53.60	33.63	1.20	27.22	86.71
Cummins	517.32	-17.99	737.76	400.72	1.70	26.33	71.22
CVD Health	87.95	1.52	110.68	68.51	3.02	23.02	112.49
Danaher	218.49	2.88	242.80	160.93	0.73	38.81	153.60
Deere & Co	656.87	-25.92	721.22	433.00	0.99	36.41	177.11
Diamonds	578.96	-1.85	633.00	400.00	1.00	24.55	100.00
Diamondback Energy	184.38	-0.60	216.90	137.03	2.39	35.12	51.63
Digital Realty Trust	180.47	-4.18	208.14	146.23	2.70	83.94	66.95
Dominion Energy	61.53	-0.47	72.99	55.85	4.34	21.22	54.12
DocuOph A	191.24	-2.38	285.50	143.30	0.00	98.58	78.22
DR Horton	133.28	-3.47	170.78	131.75	1.35	12.67	37.28
Duke Energy	115.50	-0.16	134.49	112.40	3.76	17.39	90.06
Eaton Corp	431.33	-13.76	478.00	311.92	1.02	43.79	167.53
Ecolab	278.10	-2.72	309.27	243.15	1.05	37.08	77.96
Edwards Lifesciences Corp	85.78	-0.70	96.29	72.30	0.00	50.76	49.44
Elevance Health	404.31	4.22	436.24	274.84	1.70	17.83	87.68
Eli Lilly & Co	1188.72	31.23	1292.65	783.65	0.58	39.92	1119.01
Emerson Electric	159.22	-2.18	166.35	122.64	1.39	34.69	88.81
EOG Resources	144.21	-0.07	154.16	101.59	2.83	11.15	75.64
Equinix	102.71	-15.69	108.72	72.62	2.60	66.22	101.41
Exelon	41.48	-0.19	50.65	39.73	4.05	15.20	42.83
ExxonMobil Hldgs	164.05	-0.43	169.64	136.01	2.51	21.11	674.56
Fastenal	49.83	-0.98	52.91	38.97	2.09	42.23	57.18
FedEx	289.04	0.01	413.87	224.61	1.69	15.31	68.41
Ferguson Ent	215.06	-8.27	271.64	212.13	1.66	21.61	41.60
FICO/SSAC	681.77	-13.69	1881.21	596.05	0.00	19.61	14.72
Fiserv	45.31	-0.17	128.78	43.87	0.00	8.66	24.09
Flutter Entertainment	75.85	-0.40	255.26	73.50	0.00	316.04	13.16
Fortinet Inc	189.28	-1.99	192.41	73.55	0.00	72.52	138.88
Freeport-McMoRan	71.86	-0.70	80.24	38.54	0.83	35.23	103.19
Garmin	276.16	-3.05	314.28	186.67	1.52	28.32	53.26
GE Aerospace	303.62	-5.77	388.84	268.91	0.62	35.55	315.02
GE Healthcare Tech	64.67	-0.10	69.77	58.75	0.25	14.87	29.21
General Dynamics	907.08	-32.12	1195.94	536.10	0.26	28.25	265.56
General Motors	80.99	-1.02	91.65	54.33	0.85	35.21	71.06
Givaud Sciences	146.85	2.62	157.29	112.82	2.23	56.26	182.09
Goldman Sachs Group	887.21	-9.97	1153.99	740.01	2.25	13.52	258.33
HCA Healthcare	439.17	6.97	556.52	353.99	0.71	14.53	95.08
Hilton Worldwide Holdings	320.53	-2.08	358.00	253.54	0.19	46.59	72.14
Home Depot	285.77	-0.92	397.63	277.15	3.26	19.97	285.11
Honeywell International	208.11	-4.76	267.99	180.01	1.35	14.91	65.96
Howmet Aerospace	222.75	-8.05	310.00	183.83	0.25	47.80	88.83
IBM	220.51	-0.78	332.46	199.19	3.07	19.26	207.75
Illinois Tool Works	261.15	-5.99	303.15	238.82	2.63	23.61	74.38
Intact	113.12	0.62	142.35	32.89	0.00	54.12	594.39
Interactive Bkgn Grp A	87.74	-2.84	98.75	58.95	0.40	34.68	35.75
Intercontinental Exchange	152.59	-0.90	178.05	121.79	1.36	21.46	85.66
Intercontinental Midstream	58.00	-0.48	64.20	40.00	0.00	15.87	53.00
Intuitive Surgical	414.52	9.76	603.88	329.57	0.00	46.89	146.44
Johnson & Johnson	258.45	3.67	281.07	182.94	2.07	29.60	622.84
Johnson Controls Intl	155.93	-2.83	160.41	104.49	1.03	74.25	94.45
JPMorgan Chase	329.58	-1.70	366.50	279.10	2.00	14.10	876.09
Kenvue	17.53	-0.06	20.13	14.02	4.79	20.38	33.67
Keurig Dr Pepper	30.54	-0.59	33.82	24.88	3.01	19.96	41.56
Kimberly Clark	96.48	-0.29	123.09	92.42	5.31	19.03	32.09
Kinder Morgan P	31.82	-0.34	34.80	25.60	3.74	20.53	70.86
KKR & Co.	89.67	-1.00	144.84	82.67	0.87	28.56	80.49
KLA	196.83	-0.63	2431.29	165.89	0.47	53.49	256.86
L3Pharma Technologies	233.63	-4.27	378.23	234.01	2.14	25.23	43.51
Lam Research	329.51	-4.38	438.50	131.02	0.40	56.91	412.36
Lockheed Martin	499.97	-5.80	546.20	397.25	1.32	31.08	223.11
Merck & Company	181.54	-2.13	293.04	178.65	0.00	13.31	109.33
Lululemon athletica	91.88	-1.73	225.98	91.28	0.00	7.56	9.70
Marathon Petroleum	442.26	9.90	437.67	161.93	0.90	15.31	124.20
Marriott International A	356.50	-4.78	410.98	256.76	0.82	36.79	92.96
McDonald's	230.88	-1.57	341.75	229.20	3.34	18.69	163.38
McKesson	910.33	-11.34	999.00	723.68	0.41	24.31	106.14
Medtronic	85.51	-1.58	106.33	73.31	3.37	20.91	109.38
Merck & Co	142.79	0.85	156.92	82.01	2.38	113.33	352.29
Meta Platforms A	721.31	-17.57	778.82	520.26	0.29	26.81	1590.58
MetLife	95.76	-1.38	100.93	67.33	2.47	18.21	60.87
Micron Technology	1088.00	-10.00	1200.00	779.61	0.06	24.27	1228.78
Microsoft Word	55.58	0.46	55.62	44.73	0.00	25.41	59.33
Mondelez International A	59.38	-0.24	66.65	51.20	3.50	21.75	75.79
Monster Beverage	42.88	-0.37	100.34	41.05	0.00	39.34	83.87
Moody's	449.63	-2.69	546.88	402.28	0.92	32.75	77.88
Morgan Stanley	189.71	-1.31	232.25	151.84	2.42	15.18	297.95
Motorola Solutions	448.33	-7.95	494.85	359.36	1.08	34.89	74.20
MSCI Inc A	555.38	0.46	644.77	501.08	1.48	30.32	40.38
Nasdaq	91.93	-0.34	101.78	76.55	1.35	26.57	51.39
Netflix	69.70	1.01	1246.60	65.08	0.00	21.58	290.23
Newmont Corp	113.54	-2.65	135.29	76.05	0.92	14.26	119.64
NextEra Energy	77.06	-0.02	98.75	74.41	3.23	17.20	160.75
Nike B	34.36	-0.25	71.58	31.97	4.77	16.44	41.37
Norfolk Southern	313.20	-3.11	358.60	277.80	1.72	26.68	70.35
Northrop Grumman	473.46	-9.65	774.00	470.06	2.09	15.02	67.26
NuHoldings A	15.58	-0.08	15.67	13.49	0.00	26.41	59.33
NVIDIA	234.77	-1.47	233.37	164.27	0.42	29.87	5723.03
NXP Semiconductors	235.22	-9.16	339.95	183.00	1.72	19.95	59.31
Occidental Petroleum	58.21	-0.12	67.45	38.80	1.92	16.92	58.19

INTEREST RATES: MARKET
Oct 08	Overnight	Change		OneMonth	ThreeMonth	SixMonth	OneYear
		Day	Week
SOFR	3.900	0.010	0.000	3.917	4.030	4.183	4.476
EURIBOR	-	-	-	2.443	2.636	2.947	3.194
ESTR	2.439	0.000	0.002	2.449	2.514	2.654	2.892
SARION	-0.038	0.001	0.001	-0.040	-0.046	-0.044	-0.046
SONIA	3.732	0.000	0.000	3.767	3.935	4.129	4.465

Rates are fixed at 11am UK time.

BONDS: TEN YEAR GOVT SPREADS

BONDS: TEN YEAR GOVT SPREADS
	Bid Yield	Spread vs Bund	Spread vs Bond		Bid Yield	Spread vs Bund	Spread vs Bond
Austria	3.67	0.20	-1.60	Italy	4.44	0.97	-0.83
Australia	5.33	1.86	0.06	Japan	3.04	-0.43	-2.23
Belgium	4.22	0.75	-1.05	Netherlands	3.54	0.07	-1.73
Brazil	12.76	9.29	7.49	Poland	6.26	2.79	0.99
China	1.69	-1.78	-3.58	Portugal	3.90	0.43	-1.37
Denmark	3.29	-0.18	-1.98	Spain	4.02	0.55	-1.25
France	4.78	1.31	-0.49	Sweden	3.13	-0.34	-2.14
Germany	3.47	0.00	-1.80	UK	5.41	1.94	0.14
Ireland	3.53	0.06	-1.74	US	5.27	1.80	0.00

The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com

Data provided by ICE. www.ice.com

Stock	Price	+Chg	High	Low	Yld	P/E	M (p)
ONEOK	88.05	-1.18	90.05	87.89	4.86	15.15	55.51
Oracle	143.56	-1.21	322.54	114.50	1.39	22.15	434.03
O’Folsky Automotive	84.61	-0.53	104.06	82.59	0.00	26.78	68.45
Orla Wholesale	65.72	-0.16	107.00	73.50	0.00	14.68	33.03
S&P 500	147.82	-0.19	167.25	137.62	2.95	21.00	54.03
PACCAR	106.86	-2.46	139.24	92.25	1.31	22.45	56.25
Palantir Technologies A	194.12	2.05	207.52	106.37	0.00	152.85	446.61
Palo Alto Networks	405.57	-14.34	432.32	139.57	0.00	989.20	331.76
Parker-Hannifin	952.79	-32.12	1099.94	715.37	0.84	32.98	120.16
Paychex	101.55	0.53	129.24	85.45	4.69	20.15	36.15
PayPal Holdings	54.95	0.34	79.22	38.46	1.02	10.31	47.01
PepsiCo	123.73	-1.98	171.48	124.22	4.78	16.20	168.88
Pfizer	28.00	0.50	29.21	23.62	6.14	36.36	159.59
Philip Morris Intl	192.69	2.29	207.76	142.11	3.32	27.69	300.33
Phillips 66	271.62	1.83	277.12	126.74	1.87	15.45	108.38
PNC Financial Services Gp	217.72	-2.44	258.96	176.88	3.67	11.98	86.86
Progressive	214.12	2.07	245.64	189.20	0.19	10.72	124.43
Prologis Inc	127.30	-1.38	153.35	111.03	3.36	28.16	120.98
Prudential Financial	112.36	-1.18	127.72	91.89	4.98	10.13	38.76
Public Storage	281.99	-3.86	335.55	256.54	4.26	26.81	52.69
QUALCOMM	177.11	-1.00	200.00	147.00	0.00	10.00	100.00
Qualcomm Income	53.35	-0.98	67.94	53.33	6.11	38.94	50.48
Regeneron Pharma	742.12	3.40	859.34	541.00	0.51	17.72	75.06
Republic Services	216.18	1.44	233.42	196.41	1.24	30.62	66.20
Robinhood Markets A	109.51	-2.49	153.56	63.52	0.00	47.41	86.58
Rubisco A	46.41	0.85	141.95	33.88	0.00	32.91	31.09
Roper Technologies	358.57	-3.71	521.28	305.96	1.02	14.88	35.46
Ross Stores	225.53	1.32	257.00	147.49	0.79	27.07	72.05
Royal Caribbean Group	282.32	-6.46	356.38	222.22	1.95	104.95	75.72
RTX	180.26	-3.03	226.88	155.64	1.62	31.35	242.95
S&P Global	395.18	-0.95	552.25	381.61	0.98	24.04	116.50
Salesforce	224.56	-0.43	269.11	146.32	0.78	20.53	164.81
Schlumberger	47.96	-2.04	60.46	31.64	2.46	10.63	71.18
Sempra	79.69	-0.28	101.04	76.21	3.30	23.10	52.11
ServiceNow	137.87	-0.10	864.83	81.24	0.00	81.58	142.56
Simon Property Group	197.59	-4.15	238.50	172.19	4.55	13.94	63.83
Snowflake A	332.85	-3.10	394.56	118.00	0.00	108.07	117.43
Shore Enerplus	60.97	-0.97	90.08	59.46	0.96	16.78	108.36
Sherwin Co	85.44		1003.83	81.69	3.56	20.49	98.29
Southern Copper	200.57	-3.69	223.88	119.25	1.97	30.12	169.35
Spotify Technology	512.92	24.79	700.12	405.00	0.00	230.01	105.60
Starbucks Corp	93.58	-2.53	110.51	77.99	2.65	54.09	106.68
Strategy A	153.37	-11.18	359.44	81.81	0.00	1.55	55.92
Stryker	275.40	-2.80	392.55	267.00	1.28	28.30	105.64
Synopsys	502.67	-2.50	539.48	362.55	0.00	87.12	96.33
Targa Resources	283.96	-1.76	307.94	144.14	1.76	27.07	60.89
Target	150.92	-3.41	170.75	83.44	3.07	15.59	68.56
TE Connectivity	215.83	-3.68	252.56	190.27	1.45	21.00	62.49
Tesla	377.81	-2.87	498.83	297.38	0.00	320.18	1482.18
Texas Instruments	286.98	-8.25	334.03	152.73	2.10	43.72	263.91
The Altstate	223.95	-0.32	277.22	188.08	1.93	4.43	56.63
The Charles Schwab	95.58	-1.22	114.53	83.96	1.34	17.32	165.29
The Cigna Group	278.51	4.14	312.18	238.51	2.24	11.73	73.59
The Coca-Cola	85.82	-0.35	92.49	65.87	2.47	25.77	369.24
The Enghouse	45.77	-0.21	54.35	40.90	1.83	11.92	149.35
Thermo Fisher's	315.00	-6.19	377.77	289.86	1.02	28.79	76.47
The TJX Cos	138.80	1.77	170.00	122.78	1.38	25.37	152.68
The Williams Cos	71.46	-0.93	80.08	56.19	2.94	28.47	87.41
Thermo Fisher Scientific	662.06	5.48	694.33	435.27	0.28	35.58	244.79
T-Mobile US	167.65	1.72	231.02	160.81	2.52	17.50	179.83
Trade Systems	467.27	-9.12	505.87	348.06	0.90	35.43	102.81
TransDigm Group	1096.21	-7.12	1463.03	1071.25	0.00	33.25	60.59
Travelers	360.61	-0.03	398.69	252.26	1.39	9.55	75.21
Truist Financial	45.58	-0.67	56.20	40.78	4.56	10.34	55.68
Uber Technologies	68.45	-0.63	100.69	65.41	0.00	14.82	139.81
Union Pacific	274.68	-1.93	315.99	215.53	2.07	22.89	163.18
United Parcel Service B	92.29	-0.82	122.41	82.00	7.11	17.15	68.16
United Rentals	1037.44	-43.18	1179.18	701.59	0.74	24.90	64.57
UnitedHealth Group	375.98	-0.34	461.62	255.97	2.47	24.10	337.48
US Bancorp	56.17	-1.12	66.08	45.02	3.85	11.21	87.52
Valero Energy	424.10	4.88	422.99	155.29	1.13	17.68	122.11
Verizon Communications	45.77	-0.21	57.74	43.90	6.18	11.92	138.18
Vermilion Media Group A	31.44	-0.03	59.00	27.17	4.77	0.00	4.36
Vertex Pharmaceuticals	505.64	3.33	560.25	400.86	0.00	29.21	128.16
Visa A	372.10	1.46	385.57	293.89	0.72	31.61	634.10
Voltra	166.72	6.22	217.10	132.66	0.55	27.79	55.96
Walmart	108.16	0.96	135.16	98.88	3.92	30.05	858.11
Walt Disney	104.75	0.72	117.09	92.19	1.43	21.51	180.87
Waste Management	208.94	1.06	248.13	194.11	1.81	29.51	83.52
Wells Fargo	80.26	-1.25	97.76	72.78	2.49	11.53	242.71
Welltower	221.12	-4.66	255.20	163.75	1.54	96.14	159.37
Workday A	184.26	-2.29	247.40	110.36	0.00	37.45	36.11
WW Grainger	1263.51	-12.05	1419.91	906.52	0.79	32.16	59.51
Yum Brands	140.35	0.51	170.14	134.26	2.14	17.57	38.30
Zscelta A	71.55	0.22	148.30	68.77	2.96	11.67	29.57

See FTSE website for more details www.ftse.com/products/indices/gilts. © 2026 Tradeweb Markets LLC. All rights reserved. The Tradeweb FTSE Gilt Closing Prices information contained herein is proprietary to Tradeweb; may not be copied or re-distributed; is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely; and does not constitute investment advice. Tradeweb is not responsible for any loss or damage that might result from the use of this information.

BONDS: GLOBAL INVESTMENT GRADE

Precious Metals
Gold	4111.46	5.00
Silver ($)	58.76	-1.14
Platinum	1627.86	-1.94
Palladium	1120.63	4.16
Iron Ore	90.85	-0.17

Bulk Commodities
Baltic Dry	2973.00	-21.00
Richards ICE Futures	127.10	-0.20

Energy	Price	Change
Brent Crude	105.74	4.91
Natural Gas	3.14	-0.06
Light Crude Oil	92.87	4.59
3.5 Fuel Oil	572.32	3.11
Euro Naphtha Oil	867.17	6.26

Base Metals
Aluminium	3045.00	-72.00
Copper	14301.00	-174.50
Lead	1861.50	-35.00
Nickel	15555.00	-180.00
Tin	51315.00	-2964.00
Zinc	3709.00	-54.50

VOLATILITY INDICES
Sources: Energy: NYMEX. Base Metals: LME / London Metal Exchange. Corn, Wheat, Soybeans: CBOT. Live Cattle, Live Feeder, Lean Hogs: CME.

Tradeweb

Agriculture	Price	Change
Corn	498.75	-3.25
Wheat	208.50	-1.00
Rapeseed	507.00	0.75
Sunflower Seed	10250.00	100.00
Soybeans	1287.50	-10.00
Soybeans Meal	359.90	-6.00
Cocoa (ICE Liffe)	4174.00	-57.00
Cocoa (ICE US)	5652.00	70.00
Coffee (Robusta)	3455.00	-104.00
Coffee (Arabica)	356.25	-4.85
White Sugar	555.70	-0.80
Sugar #11	20.32	-0.51
Cotton	76.30	-1.18
Orange Juice	147.25	0.70
Maple Leaf	4084.23	1.14
Live Cattle	220.70	-0.90
Feeder Cattle	336.40	-1.75
Lean Hogs	76.23	-0.70
Palm Oil (Malaysian)	1147.50	25.00

	Red Date	Coupon	Bid Price	Bid Yield	Daily	Weekly
US$
Morgan Stanley	30/01	4.00	97.49	4.57	-0.04	0.17
Trust Finl Corp	28/06	4.12	99.42	5.12	0.04	0.10
National Rural	32/11	4.02	91.49	5.27	0.52	0.06
Washington Gaslight Co	36/03	5.78	97.97	5.02	0.00	0.00
Northern States Power	28/03	8.13	100.66	5.05	0.00	0.00
Oklahoma Gas & Elec	28/04	6.50	101.12	4.58	0.00	-0.09
Euro
Germany	25/08	2.22	88.65	3.19	-0.15	0.13
Spain	46/10	2.88	78.95	4.50	0.04	0.16
Belgium	47/06	1.50	57.46	4.92	-0.15	0.58
France	48/05	2.00	57.87	5.32	-0.22	0.79
£ Sterling
United Kingdom	46/12	4.25	80.21	5.95	-0.25	-0.25
United Kingdom	47/07	1.50	46.95	6.00	-0.13	-0.13

BONDS: BENCHMARK GOVERNMENT

	Oct 08	Day Chg	Prev	52 wk high	52 wk low
VIX	15.54	0.46	15.08	35.30	13.38
VXD	15.97	0.50	15.47	42.71	2.43
VDAX	19.36	0.75	18.61	35.58	13.53

	Red Date	Coupon	Bid Price	Bid Yield	Daily yield chg	Wkly yield chg	Mnthly yield chg	Year yield chg
Australia	06/54	4.75	84.60	5.88	0.00	0.03	0.20	0.64
	04/27	4.75	99.95	4.85	0.00	-0.02	0.09	1.48
Austria	02/33	2.88	96.35	3.55	0.00	0.02	0.19	0.67
	10/53	3.13	84.73	4.09	0.01	0.00	0.08	0.27
Belgium	06/54	3.25	74.91	4.99	0.01	-0.09	0.28	0.70
Canada	06/27	1.00	98.95	2.82	0.00	0.00	0.03	-0.18
	12/55	2.75	73.88	3.93	0.00	0.03	0.13	0.15
Denmark	11/33	2.25	94.00	2.78	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.20
	11/39	4.50	110.97	3.44	-0.01	-0.04	0.12	0.51
Finland	09/27	0.50	97.76	2.97	0.05	0.02	0.06	0.83
	09/33	3.00	95.85	3.67	0.04	0.04	0.22	0.69
France	05/54	3.00	66.16	5.37	0.02	-0.11	0.44	0.53
	11/33	3.50	93.76	4.54	0.05	-0.02	-0.91	-0.32
Germany	08/33	2.60	95.43	3.35	0.03	0.00	0.14	0.65
	08/53	1.75	65.59	3.89	0.00	-0.04	0.07	0.40
Greece	06/28	3.88	100.90	3.31	0.01	-0.14	0.23	0.87
	06/33	4.25	100.15	4.22	-0.03	0.78	0.43	0.94
Ireland	10/32	0.35	80.69	4.03	0.03	0.39	1.05	1.40
Italy	12/27	2.63	99.27	3.26	0.02	-0.11	0.23	1.01
	03/34	4.13	99.07	4.36	-0.01	-0.09	0.43	1.05
Netherlands	01/54	2.00	68.65	3.88	0.01	-0.02	0.05	0.30
	07/33	2.50	94.30	3.46	0.03	0.02	0.18	0.66
Poland	04/28	2.75	97.30	4.61	0.04	-0.10	0.25	0.76
	10/33	6.00	99.45	6.10	0.02	-0.02	0.22	1.16
Portugal	07/32	1.63	89.79	3.62	0.02	-0.03	0.30	0.84
Spain	10/52	1.88	59.60	4.58	-0.01	-0.04	0.20	0.54
	10/33	3.50	98.23	3.83	0.01	-0.02	0.31	0.78
Sweden	11/33	1.75	96.30	2.50	0.00	0.00	0.00	-0.14
Switzerland	03/36	2.50	117.67	0.32	0.00	-0.02	-0.22	-0.92
United Kingdom	06/28	0.00	92.56	4.75	0.06	0.05	0.26	0.98
	10/53	3.75	69.91	6.02	0.01	0.05	0.19	0.80
United States	11/33	4.50	95.92	5.19	0.00	0.05	0.50	1.22
	11/53	4.75	86.93	5.70	-0.03	0.04	0.42	0.87

GILTS: UK CASH MARKET

Oct 08	Price	Yield	Red Yield	Day	Week	High	Low
Tr 1.25pc '27	97.60	1.28	4.43	-0.03	-0.03	97.71	95.53
Tr 0.875pc '29	88.86	0.98	4.86	-0.17	-0.27	91.00	0.01
Tr 1pc '32	81.23	1.23	5.08	-0.21	-0.31	85.07	81.01
Tr 4.25pc '36	91.37	4.65	5.43	-0.30	-0.58	99.39	91.15
Tr 4.5pc '42	86.05	5.23	5.85	-0.30	-0.63	96.45	85.71
Tr 3.75pc '52	70.76	5.30	5.99	-0.22	-0.52	81.50	70.51
Tr 4pc '60	71.92	5.56	5.95	-0.23	-0.53	83.52	71.62

Closing prices and highs & lows are in traded currency. Market capitalisations are in local currency. Highs & lows are based on a rolling 52 week period

GILTS: UK FTSE ACTUARIES INDICES

Price IndicesFixed Coupon	Oct 8	Dayschg %	TotalReturn	MonthReturn	YearReturn	Yield
Up to 5 Years	84.41	-0.12	2650.55	-0.33	0.83	4.85
5-10 Years	140.95	-0.27	3336.96	-1.69	-2.32	5.29
10-15 Years	138.44	-0.32	3639.29	-2.35	-4.30	5.67
5-15 Years	138.60	-0.29	3400.30	-1.89	-2.93	5.44
Over 15 Years	160.60	-0.31	3205.37	-2.56	-7.88	5.93
All stocks	123.33	-0.23	3090.12	-1.44	-2.75	5.62

Index Linked	Oct 8	Day's chg %	Month chg %	Year's chg %	Total Return	Return 1 Month	Return 1 Year
Up to 5 Years	365.14	0.03	0.16	2.79	3186.58	0.18	3.62
Over 5 Years	462.69	0.14	-1.81	-3.25	3628.09	-1.63	-2.65
5-15 Years	454.18	-0.02	-1.49	0.29	3816.78	-1.29	1.04
Over 15 Years	459.28	0.32	-2.15	-6.64	3469.29	-1.99	-6.17
All stocks	462.26	0.11	-1.37	-2.02	3699.58	-1.22	-1.38

Yield Indices	Oct 8	Oct 7	Yr Ago
5 Yrs	5.04	4.99	4.26
10 Yrs	5.47	5.43	4.59
15 Yrs	5.76	5.73	4.88
20 Yrs	5.91	5.88	5.02
45 Yrs	5.75	5.73	4.91

Real Yield 0% Inflation	Oct 8	Dur Yrs	Previous	Yr Ago
Up to 5 Years	1.04	2.60	1.05	0.73
Over 5 Years	2.42	16.10	2.43	1.90
5-15 Years	2.14	9.43	2.14	1.61
Over 15 Years	2.54	22.88	2.56	2.01
All stocks	2.36	13.20	2.37	1.86

Real Yield 5% Inflation	Oct 8	Dur Yrs	Previous	Yr Ago
Up to 5 Years	0.81	2.60	0.81	0.43
Over 5 Years	2.40	16.10	2.40	1.88
5-15 Years	2.09	9.43	2.08	1.54
Over 15 Years	2.53	22.88	2.54	2.00
All stocks	2.33	13.20	2.33	1.82

FT

FINANCIAL TIMES

Energy Source

Profit. Power. Politics.

The Ground Truth image displays a long, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

Industrial General
Coats Group	81.70	0.70	98.10	73.15	3.08	18.28	3469.44
Macfarlane◆	83.00	-1.40	93.80	59.80	4.41	20.80	118.67
Smiths	2710.00	-52.00	2885.00	2088.00	1.79	4.31	1451.35
Industrial Transportation

Main Market

	Price +/- Dly Chg		52 Week		Yld	P/E	Vol000s
			High	Low
Aerospace & Defence
BAE Systems■	1836.50	10.50	2360.00	1529.00	2.06	26.69	3762.72
Chemring Group	499.00	-1.00	650.75	446.52	1.62	28.03	1079.96
Automobiles & Parts
Ford Motors	916.34	-0.52	1319.04	841.76	4.95	-5.09	-
Banks
ANZ Group	1966.68	-32.16	2126.50	1753.25	5.82	19.19	4951.99
Banco Santander	1012.00	-22.00	1122.00	709.00	1.71	13.12	8926.92
Bank of Nova Scotia▲	6646.30	47.41	7165.88	4711.98	3.65	-	6689.95
Barclays■	426.15	-5.90	554.10	353.55	2.70	9.73	39560.45
Canadian Imperial▲	8210.63	4.10	9198.88	5969.15	2.77	-	370.40
HSBC■	1380.60	-27.40	1610.00	959.29	4.03	15.09	24504.66
Lion Finance Gp	12370.00	-460.00	14820.00	7320.00	2.56	8.44	73.20
Lloyds Bnkg Gp■	100.60	-1.70	117.90	81.82	3.99	14.37	234134.30
NatWest Group	639.80	-10.00	726.00	504.41	5.47	11.96	32736.56
OSB Group	473.60	-11.80	647.50	472.00	7.58	6.26	1011.54
Perm TSB Group	249.55	-1.53	291.66	182.42	0.62	6.49	1152.63
Royal Bank of CA	14438.20	-46.54	16187.03	10784.89	2.59	-	854.55
Stand Chart	2108.00	-43.00	2364.00	1351.50	2.44	14.27	5023.87
...7.375%Pl	107.50	-0.25	128.84	102.00	6.86	-	76.74
...8.25%Pl	118.75	-	143.80	114.25	6.95	-	159.55
Toronto-Dominion	8625.10	1.26	9256.88	5880.62	2.71	-	5267.53
Westpack	1774.54	-28.89	2275.39	1755.74	4.57	16.78	3773.69

Elementis	178.80	-1.40	195.40	136.00	1.86	-30.32	709.35
Johnson Matthey	2446.00	34.00	3245.25	2192.00	4.20	-32.07	278.30
Victrex	924.00	-5.00	1024.00	515.00	3.25	28.88	96.41
Construction & Materials

Galliford Try Hldgs	682.00	-3.00	726.81	466.00	3.45	16.35	217.46
Morgan Sindell*	4068.00	-10.00	5730.00	3938.00	4.01	10.93	64.62
Electronic & Electrical Equip
discoverGrp	848.00	-2.00	900.00	505.00	1.53	28.08	256.68
Halma	3500.00	22.00	4902.00	3268.00	0.71	35.51	667.23
Morgan Adv Mat	265.00	-5.00	278.00	179.80	4.60	35.33	455.34
Oxford Instruments	2926.00	-122.00	3318.00	1682.00	0.81	34.59	140.44
Renishaw	5650.00	-115.00	6030.00	3280.00	1.45	34.56	149.97
TT Electronics	179.00	-9.40	197.80	93.00	—	-6.28	400.76
XP Power	1946.00	-38.00	2160.00	849.23	—	-46.33	65.14

Financial General
3i Group●	2352.00	-39.00	4497.00	1825.00	3.59	-	-
Aberdeen Group	237.00	2.60	265.00	179.60	6.16	10.97	2685.02
Bridgepoint Group●	382.60	17.20	397.11	212.00	2.56	76.52	3401.39
City of London Inv●	526.00	14.00	540.00	349.00	6.46	14.25	65.95
Close Bros	384.20	-5.40	556.15	318.40	-	-6.73	522.88
ICG	1735.00	-29.00	2276.00	1424.87	5.01	10.40	1459.13
Investec	588.50	-6.50	690.00	499.36	6.54	7.63	1854.25
Jupiter	170.40	-0.60	214.50	137.20	3.52	8.88	881.84
Liontrust	296.50	-0.50	358.00	223.00	6.41	19.25	81.27
London Stock Ex●	8470.00	154.00	10140.00	6884.00	1.87	35.53	752.09
Rathbones Group	1518.00	-14.00	2500.00	1490.00	6.59	14.07	66.76
S & U●	1850.00	-50.00	2458.50	1620.00	6.27	9.48	2.15
St James's Place	1020.00	-7.00	1575.50	1011.50	1.76	10.21	1931.78
TP ICAP Group●	322.00	-1.00	355.00	235.50	5.34	12.78	112.48
Vanquis Banking Gp	68.70	0.30	132.00	67.00	-	21.47	688.75
Food & Beverages

AIM

	Price	+/- Dly Dng	52 Week		Yld	P/E	Vol 000s
			High	Low
Aerospace & Defence
Cohort	1192.00	10.00	1538.00	881.10	1.50	22.82	108.75
Velocity Composites	16.25	-	25.00	12.00	-	-8.12	50.00
Basic Resources (Ex Mining)
Cropper J	670.00	-15.00	710.00	250.00	-	21.75	6.02
Construction & Materials
Accsys Tech	55.60	-1.80	79.84	55.00	-	24.57	50.57
Electronic & Electrical Equip
Checkit	16.00	-0.25	27.00	12.35	-	-6.15	41.37
LPA	82.50	-	92.00	34.00	-	-31.25	4.00
Thorpe FW	255.00	-10.00	320.00	240.00	2.88	10.75	13.83
Financial General
Arbuthnot Banking	790.00	-5.00	955.00	755.00	6.96	7.24	6.78

Investment Companies

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week				Dist - Prem
			High	Low	Yld	NAV
Conventional (Ex Private Equity)
3i Infra	385.00	1.00	399.50	325.00	3.49	405.52	-4.68
Abf GVIT	92.00	1.00	96.77	76.00	6.63	103.46	-11.61
Abf Sml	1794.00	-8.00	1828.00	1408.07	2.66	2012.64	-10.40
Aberdeen Asia Foc	468.00	-6.00	478.00	348.00	1.38	518.59	-9.78
Aberdeen Asian Inc Fund	320.00	-3.00	357.00	246.00	5.87	347.37	-7.41
Aberdeen Eq Inc	443.00	-7.00	473.00	359.25	5.21	443.93	1.03
Aberdeen UK SmlI	527.00	-3.00	544.00	441.50	2.66	569.30	-6.50
Alliance Witan	1397.00	-5.00	1409.00	1178.00	2.10	1474.98	-5.00
Allianz Tech	774.00	-2.00	789.00	460.75	—	846.30	-7.72
Artemis UK Future Lead	388.00	1.00	405.00	321.00	3.98	445.69	-11.29
Aurora UK Alpha	245.00	—	279.00	222.09	1.92	282.98	-12.92
AVI Japan	179.00	-2.00	194.00	154.50	1.23	186.58	-3.44
BG China Growth	283.00	-3.00	331.04	263.00	0.88	300.39	-6.11
BG Euro	121.00	2.50	133.00	91.40	0.60	129.88	-7.58
BG Japan	1066.00	-16.00	1114.00	811.10	0.94	1191.25	-9.29
BG Shin	175.80	-2.40	182.00	123.05	0.39	196.50	-10.01
BG US Growth	390.50	-5.50	398.00	261.00	—	406.05	-3.05
Baillie Gifford UK	215.00	1.00	231.00	180.12	2.88	237.35	-10.20
Bankers IT	154.80	-1.00	157.80	125.20	1.83	170.17	-8.22
Biotech Growth	1364.00	-66.00	1786.00	1020.00	—	1524.43	-5.97
BlckR Amer Sml	281.00	—	289.55	208.85	5.30	278.39	1.74
BlckR Energy & Res	174.00	—	205.00	135.50	3.56	182.58	-4.44
BlckR Front	187.00	-0.50	208.00	164.50	4.07	190.25	0.08
BlckR GtEur	569.00	-8.00	625.00	506.95	1.26	621.95	-7.09
BlckR I&G	238.00	3.00	240.00	208.00	3.24	252.27	-7.56
BlckR Smir	262.50	-0.50	288.40	230.80	3.02	307.28	-14.08
BlckR World Mining	923.00	-3.00	1076.00	628.00	2.60	955.51	-3.31
Brunner	1550.00	-6.00	1612.00	1336.00	1.74	1722.62	-9.36
Caledonia Inv	382.00	-4.00	402.00	312.00	2.01	595.16	-34.72
CanGen C$	2731.21	23.49	2958.28	2358.19	2.41	87.11	-42.07
City of Lon	565.00	-2.00	599.00	498.00	3.97	555.65	1.97
City Natural Res G&I	404.00	3.00	467.00	258.01	7.00	384.96	-1.50
CT Healthcare	122.00	-2.60	152.40	118.80	4.32	128.37	-4.63
CT MgdI	131.00	—	135.00	115.00	6.11	129.08	0.88
CT MgdG	327.00	-1.00	330.00	280.26	—	338.69	-3.87
CT Cp&I	336.00	-1.00	373.00	320.00	4.00	352.80	-4.50
CT UK HIT B	107.00	—	120.00	92.00	5.57	112.68	-6.89
CT UK HIT Ord	106.00	-1.00	126.00	97.00	5.62	113.20	-4.56
Dunedin Inc	303.00	-1.00	323.00	275.00	6.65	329.84	-8.19
Edinburgh Inv	819.00	—	867.00	737.60	3.91	890.08	-7.82
Edin Worldwide	277.50	-4.50	294.50	194.20	—	302.88	-6.27
The Euro SmlCo	226.00	-1.50	247.21	193.80	5.59	247.92	-8.27
F&C Inv Trust	348.40	0.20	1332.00	325.80	1.21	382.61	-9.03
Fidelity Asian	606.00	-2.00	672.00	546.06	3.38	640.53	-5.16
Fidelity China	243.50	-3.00	339.00	239.50	3.70	264.55	-7.14
Fidelity Emer Mkts	1504.00	-26.00	1574.00	897.34	1.66	1679.50	-8.48
Fidelity Euro	410.50	-4.50	447.50	367.50	2.48	436.98	-5.03

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week				Vol000s
			High	Low	Yld	P/E
AEP Plantations	196.80	1.40	229.00	124.00	3.09	11.25	248.91
Assoc. Brit Foods	1834.00	7.00	2359.00	1729.45	3.44	12.95	956.48
Barr (AG)	549.00	-11.00	715.32	538.00	3.48	12.99	878.90
Fevara	146.00	-1.00	152.00	114.50	1.64	6.32	7.91
Coca-Cola HBC	4254.00	6.00	5195.00	3326.00	2.39	19.39	275.39
Cranwick	5030.00	60.00	5810.00	4775.00	2.24	17.00	207.95
Diageo#	1622.00	11.00	1903.91	1295.50	2.33	27.47	2997.24
Greencore	252.20	3.60	307.50	191.10	1.03	19.11	2119.88
Kerry Group*	7236.68	-266.07	7646.35	5567.81	1.69	21.34	81.12
Tate & Lyle	569.50	-0.50	580.00	319.40	3.54	25.43	1531.85
Unilever	4626.00	3.00	5542.11	3644.00	3.57	12.61	2313.60

GN Store Nord	1187.49	-6.62	1429.97	984.75	—	15.43	254.70
Smith&Neph•	1003.50	-15.50	1426.59	980.40	2.99	18.41	9512.40
House, Leisure & Pers Goods
Barratt Redrow•	291.40	-8.70	410.29	235.40	2.06	21.43	5180.43
Bellway	1965.00	-35.00	2890.00	1715.00	3.66	14.80	400.73
Berkeley	3176.00	-16.00	4442.00	2796.00	—	9.58	370.66
Burberry Group	1007.00	-9.00	1376.50	953.40	—	—	1278.64
Cairn Homes•	223.00	-4.00	251.00	161.00	3.95	12.36	594.09
Games Workshop	16350.00	-190.00	23540.00	14280.00	3.43	26.20	71.52
Gleeson (MJ)	270.50	2.00	435.00	221.00	1.85	-81.48	38.52
Headlam Group#	10.50	—	60.23	4.64	—	-0.10	—
McBride	174.00	-1.80	214.10	107.60	1.78	9.83	209.79
Philips	1820.18	-3.01	2413.42	1790.38	3.96	-42.96	1495.04
PZ Cussons•	95.40	-0.80	114.00	65.09	3.88	20.30	393.13
Viatry Group	217.20	-7.40	746.40	216.00	—	5.15	2837.08

Bodycote♦	910.00	-0.50	967.50	585.00	2.56	29.35	265.19
Goodwin♦	14140.00	-60.00	28500.00	10820.00	2.33	19.15	13.98
Hill & Smith	3000.00	-100.00	3345.00	1994.00	-	29.21	607.81
IMI	3032.00	-20.00	3202.00	2244.00	1.16	24.39	569.55
Melrose	438.30	-11.70	685.00	409.90	1.71	15.11	5723.42
RHI	2705.00	-135.00	3390.00	1920.00	5.64	17.54	40.02
Weir♦	2538.00	-22.00	3580.00	2254.00	1.66	26.52	649.35

Braemar	235.00	-	249.00	203.11	2.98	32.46	36.78
Fisher (J)	420.00	3.00	554.00	358.00	-	-48.28	66.85
Insurance
Admiral Group	3624.00	-10.00	4128.00	2624.00	3.95	14.71	671.22
Aviva+	672.60	-4.60	740.60	590.60	5.98	25.00	3377.55
Chesnara+	326.00	-4.00	378.00	265.00	7.04	-64.55	507.31
Ecclesiastical Insurance	130.25	-	155.00	125.50	6.62	-	61.49
Hansard Global+	53.75	-0.25	60.80	43.20	8.28	11.44	47.62
Hiscox	1822.00	-12.00	1952.00	1288.00	2.15	13.34	1526.14
Lancashire Hldgs	635.00	-6.50	700.00	549.00	2.64	6.94	238.68
Legal & General	285.50	-2.60	318.10	217.20	7.67	28.58	21553.39
Old Mutual+	59.20	-	78.80	55.00	7.34	6.61	202.78
Prudential+	887.60	6.80	1238.00	867.40	2.37	7.61	11581.53
Standard Life+	838.50	-33.00	960.00	633.50	6.69	-178.03	10498.61
Leisure
ME Group	111.80	-2.00	195.94	98.50	7.50	7.45	505.93

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week				Vol 000s
			High	Low	Yld	P/E
BP Marsh	655.00	-	710.00	613.00	5.54	4.94	5.85
Burlford Capital	249.20	-20.80	880.50	249.20	3.79	11.37	175.24
Premier Miton Group	34.75	-	64.00	34.50	8.63	44.55	768.39
Food & Beverages
Camellia	5725.00	-175.00	6300.00	4800.00	4.54	-30.66	0.01
Fevertree Drinks◆	845.00	5.00	973.00	711.00	2.06	44.99	381.19
Nichols	1090.00	-10.00	1200.00	880.00	3.57	18.58	22.98
House, Leisure & Pers Goods
Churchill◆	355.00	4.00	460.00	271.00	5.92	8.94	7.50
Frontier Dev◆	576.00	-7.00	640.00	302.00	-	7.72	70.55
Portmeirion	47.50	-0.50	118.00	46.60	-	-1.05	121.10
Sanderson Design Grp	74.50	-	80.00	40.00	2.01	25.00	129.95
Industrial Engineering
MS Intl	1565.00	30.00	1800.00	1120.00	1.66	23.22	15.79

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week			Yld	NAV	Dist-)Prem
			High	Low
Fidelity Spec	459.00	-1.00	479.50	384.77	2.25	461.56	-0.36
Finsbury G&I	776.00	-4.00	875.00	706.25	2.71	828.68	-7.07
The Glbl Small Co	189.40	-0.80	198.60	162.72	1.66	200.02	-5.04
GRIT(susp)	1.25	—	1.25	1.25	—	14.40	-91.32
Hansa	330.00	-4.00	346.00	250.00	1.33	558.98	-40.47
Hansa A	335.00	—	340.00	244.00	1.31	558.98	-39.94
Hen FarEs	267.50	-3.50	281.50	229.00	9.36	254.09	5.68
Hen High Inc	198.00	-0.50	214.00	173.25	5.62	208.32	-3.92
Hen Smrl	945.00	-7.00	998.00	769.00	3.07	1047.47	-9.56
Herald	2935.00	-35.00	3290.73	2285.00	—	3446.26	-13.41
HICL Infra	131.00	—	141.00	107.20	6.49	160.40	-17.61
Impax Env	454.00	1.50	494.76	379.00	1.15	505.12	-13.02
IntlBiotech	1030.00	-30.00	1235.00	788.88	3.04	1077.35	-0.93
Intl PP	135.00	-0.60	145.80	115.60	6.51	153.71	-11.11
Inv Asia Dragon Tst	493.00	-6.00	520.00	395.00	3.89	536.15	-7.34
Inv Bond Inc	168.00	-1.00	178.50	150.11	7.29	166.01	1.60
JPM Amer IT	1246.00	—	1258.00	1041.00	0.92	1300.65	-3.72
JPM Asia G&I	578.00	-22.00	652.00	426.00	5.71	591.64	-0.32
JPM China G&I	250.50	-4.00	313.00	250.00	4.55	277.61	-10.38
JPM Clavr	924.00	—	986.00	799.98	3.95	953.70	-3.56
JPM Emrg EMEA	229.00	—	310.00	196.00	0.26	69.69	240.43
JPM Emrg	168.20	-3.60	181.20	126.20	4.48	184.65	-8.40
JPM Eur Disc	599.00	-4.00	666.00	548.00	2.67	658.55	-8.26
JPM Eur G&I	135.20	-2.60	153.00	124.50	4.02	141.85	-3.46
JPM Em Mk Div	214.00	-2.00	222.00	155.50	2.80	234.78	-8.30
JPM Gbl G&I	613.00	-0.50	641.00	529.60	4.05	635.35	-2.81
JPM India Gwth Inc	818.00	-16.00	1098.00	799.00	5.18	912.93	-8.79
JPM Japan	830.00	-10.00	867.00	668.00	1.05	918.13	-8.45
JPM UK Sm	349.00	3.00	369.00	287.92	4.28	375.32	-7.17
JPM US Sml	410.00	-5.00	463.00	365.00	0.78	457.73	-9.00
Law Deb	1192.00	-24.00	1290.00	991.00	3.06	1189.47	1.37
Lindsell Train	574.00	—	750.00	529.50	4.88	6.52	-13.88
Lowland	182.00	-2.00	191.50	148.00	3.78	199.93	-8.32
Marwyn Val	141.00	—	141.30	140.52	6.43	264.21	-46.63
Mercantile	268.00	-2.00	290.50	234.31	3.10	299.74	-9.56
Merch. Trst	648.00	-9.00	691.00	536.25	4.61	678.99	-4.47
Mid Wynd	796.00	-2.00	814.00	682.00	1.08	817.34	-2.18
Monks IT	1674.00	4.00	1687.13	1366.00	0.05	1763.63	-5.46
Montanaro Eur	174.50	-1.50	189.00	142.00	0.89	195.14	-9.75
Murray Inc	952.00	-2.00	1036.00	854.66	4.31	1019.10	-6.67
Murray Intl	353.00	-4.00	376.00	296.50	3.63	353.66	0.69
New Star IT	138.00	—	148.00	111.00	2.57	202.71	-30.68
N. Atl Smrl IT	418.00	-10.00	434.00	328.00	1.67	649.93	-34.61
Pac. Horiz.	1114.00	-18.00	1262.00	719.00	—	1227.11	-9.14
Pers. Assets	541.00	-1.00	558.00	515.00	1.04	547.41	-0.70
Polar Health	417.50	-17.50	460.50	352.11	0.53	426.53	1.22
Polar Fin.	236.50	-2.50	260.50	199.16	—	246.78	-3.16
Polar Tech.	705.50	-6.50	743.50	420.00	—	787.01	-8.70

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week		Yld	P/E	Vol000s
			High	Low
Media
Autotrader Grp	485.90	15.10	828.80	418.60	2.39	14.22	4332.43
Informa	891.00	24.40	1000.00	719.00	2.52	-	7159.27
ITV	66.60	0.85	87.35	65.70	7.51	11.29	7673.90
Pearson	1266.50	23.50	1337.00	874.80	2.02	24.64	1941.53
Reach	47.10	0.05	73.70	39.00	12.53	-1.12	381.24
Relx■	2595.00	-4.00	3539.00	1991.00	2.66	23.05	3336.33
Rightmove◆	502.60	41.10	700.40	391.40	2.14	17.89	6856.71
STV Group	101.00	-1.00	124.50	95.60	-	-9.35	8.80
Mining

Anglo American	4040.00	-19.00	4348.00	2639.00	0.71	-16.15	1798.42
Antofagasta	3605.00	-87.00	4475.00	2496.00	1.64	35.37	1025.64
BHP Group	3187.00	-28.00	3592.00	1971.00	3.99	21.77	673.61
Ferrexpo	31.64	-0.30	87.23	25.22	-	-1.10	513.66
Fresnillo	2689.00	1.00	4472.00	2000.00	4.16	18.94	489.25
Glencore■	568.70	-0.20	707.20	332.20	2.26	-	31958.53
Harmony+	1210.48	1.37	1963.66	946.96	4.81	11.51	2502.09
Rio Tinto■	7022.00	-	9117.00	4955.50	4.96	15.13	1688.13

BP■	584.80	22.80	609.40	399.35	4.29	-	35375.16
Capricorn	429.00	2.00	450.00	181.80	-	20.26	545.80
ExxonMobil Hldgs	12710.10	-	12780.40	12620.10	2.45	-	-
GeoPark	864.93	-	874.00	858.13	0.80	13.95	-
Helleniq Energy	1546.48	-	1546.48	1499.87	3.29	6.27	510.21
Imperial Oil C$	9267.51	221.58	10397.16	6229.98	2.00	-	425.90
TC Energy Corp♦	4537.85	-	4539.44	4480.46	4.11	-24.01	913.08

AstraZeneca■	11892.00	-288.00	15732.00	9892.00	2.01	23.83	2276.63
Chemical Works	2867.55	-	2867.55	2867.55	5.29	14.83	-
GlaxoSmKline■●	1735.50	-55.00	2282.00	1592.00	4.03	12.30	16331.28
Hikma Pharm	1607.00	-39.00	1865.00	1187.00	4.05	11.68	623.04

REITs
British Land	384.80	-6.40	451.60	335.40	6.01	-	-
Derwent London	1749.00	-37.00	2196.00	1469.33	4.69	-	-
Great Portland Est	300.80	-3.80	377.00	270.00	2.73	-	0.00
Land Securities	601.00	-11.50	726.00	525.00	6.86	-	-
LondonMetric Prop	172.00	-0.40	216.20	170.20	7.30	-	-19.53
Primary Health Prop	89.25	-	109.60	87.40	8.18	-	-
Segro	908.00	-5.60	997.40	632.20	3.47	-	-
Shaftesbury Capital	134.10	-2.00	155.10	124.10	3.21	7.17	2012.60
Tritax Big Box	138.90	-2.70	175.00	138.50	5.94	-	-

Real Estate Inv & Services
Grainger	159.90	-4.00	202.79	149.44	5.25	-	-
Harworth Group▲	187.00	-	195.00	116.80	0.98	64.48	1091.99
Helical	175.00	-2.00	236.25	170.50	1.50	36.23	93.79
Mountview Estates	8500.00	-125.00	10200.00	8350.00	6.18	16.28	0.43
Savills	955.00	2.00	1142.00	791.46	2.46	18.37	427.84
Sirius Real Estate	88.75	0.55	113.00	85.85	6.11	6.91	3272.65
Smart (J)	115.00	-	140.00	106.00	2.83	8.80	-
Retailers
Caffyns	500.00	-	550.00	350.00	2.00	-12.29	-
Dunelm Group	788.00	-	1174.00	707.00	8.95	10.23	302.18

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week				Vol000s
			High	Low	Yld	P/E
Halfords Group	258.50	-1.50	276.10	123.80	3.48	17.01	498.18
Inchcape	658.00	14.00	895.00	627.87	5.11	9.08	2145.67
JD Sports	84.02	0.52	104.65	63.98	1.51	9.74	6578.21
Kingfisher*	322.40	-6.70	372.30	266.40	3.85	23.03	6351.97
Marks & Spencer	396.10	2.30	418.33	301.10	1.06	31.19	6155.45
Saga	755.00	-6.00	799.00	234.50	–	–	536.89
Sainsbury J	332.40	4.80	380.30	293.70	4.12	19.21	16263.31
Tesco	500.40	24.60	512.60	411.70	2.95	18.20	30091.28

	52 Week
	Price	+/- Dly Chg	High	Low	Yld	P/E	Vol 000s
Media
Mission Group	25.50	-	29.00	12.00	-	-1.20	84.84
Mining
Central Asia Metals●	151.20	1.20	244.00	125.27	10.25	-4.70	851.81
Crim St Therapeutics	9.25	-	18.50	8.00	-	-1.81	24.46
Oil & Gas
BorSthnPet	8.16	0.20	14.00	7.26	-	-67.46	10141.47
Pharmaceuticals & Biotech
Sareum Holdings#	27.50	-	40.00	9.50	-	-11.46	-
Retailers
Boohoo Group	24.60	0.60	29.50	10.30	-	-3.18	832.13
CVS Group	1145.00	-18.00	1648.00	1062.00	0.79	46.93	290.78

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week				Dis(-)Prem
			High	Low	Yld	NAV
Rights & Iss IT	2480.00	40.00	2520.00	1965.13	1.82	3030.20	-18.64
RIT Cap.	2450.00	-15.00	2645.00	1985.25	1.84	3198.50	-23.25
Ruffer Inv Pr	291.50	-1.50	319.00	281.26	2.12	301.63	-3.77
Schdr AsiaPac	832.00	-17.00	892.00	641.35	1.56	927.23	-9.31
Schdr AsiaTotal	700.00	-13.00	746.00	530.00	1.64	744.14	-5.53
Schroder Inc	352.00	1.00	380.00	314.00	4.35	373.83	-5.75
Schdr Japan	385.00	-5.00	402.53	276.00	3.46	424.31	-8.65
Schdr Orient.	451.00	-7.00	478.00	317.00	2.93	476.24	-4.72
Schdr UK Mid	750.00	2.00	790.00	652.00	3.01	796.19	-4.52
Scot American	552.00	-1.00	572.00	480.10	2.97	596.94	-7.29
Scot Mortgage	1623.00	-3.00	1651.50	1015.74	0.28	1787.01	-8.86
Scot Oriental	279.00	-3.00	295.00	240.00	1.22	312.75	-10.07
Strategic Eq.	400.00	3.00	415.00	330.00	1.12	445.96	-9.78
Temple Bar	410.00	0.50	429.50	345.25	3.80	410.40	0.10
Tetragon	1107.62	-0.63	1476.82	892.96	3.21	—
TRIG	75.40	-0.30	80.50	63.20	10.01	101.36	-25.09
UIL	211.00	—	212.00	210.00	3.79	286.24	-26.61
Utilico EmerMkts	295.00	2.00	302.00	243.00	3.28	324.17	-10.35
Worldwide Hlth	358.00	-13.50	401.50	322.52	0.67	394.98	-6.14
Conventional - Private Equity
CT PrivEq	454.00	-5.00	592.00	439.84	6.24	689.05	-32.62
HGCapital	365.50	-7.50	512.00	318.64	1.37	530.14	-28.22
HVPE	3205.00	-30.00	3500.00	2807.59	—	4518.00	-27.18
ICG Ent	1380.00	—	1611.42	1288.31	3.04	2089.33	-32.48
Pantheon Int	379.50	-2.00	409.00	339.05	—	534.60	-27.80
Partners PE €	591.48	-1.29	945.52	569.45	10.03	11.58	-40.07
Conventional - Property ICs
AEW UK REIT	97.30	-2.10	113.20	95.90	8.22	106.91	-7.28
TR Prop	268.50	-2.50	364.50	267.50	6.00	304.65	-9.22
VCTs
Bmd 2nd VT	45.40	1.00	54.00	39.50	8.81	46.55	-4.62
Nthn 2 VCT	53.00	—	56.50	47.00	5.66	55.40	-4.33
Nthn 3 VCT	82.00	—	86.50	79.50	5.49	86.00	-4.65
Nthn Venture	56.00	—	59.50	53.00	5.54	58.60	-4.44
Zero Dividend Preference Shares
Aberforth GV	118.00	—	120.18	111.00	—	116.61	1.21
Investment Companies - AIM
Crys Amber	75.00	-0.50	155.39	72.10	—	172.64	-55.69

Bunzl	2710.00	60.00	2898.00	1981.00	2.76	19.22	1420.73
Capita	215.50	9.50	416.00	196.20	-	-1.50	1257.66
DCC Energy	6445.00	5.00	6740.00	4188.00	3.36	-	765.34
Diploma	7750.00	50.00	7980.00	4970.00	0.82	56.20	429.37
Essentra●	111.40	-0.80	115.20	78.40	1.89	-	182.01
Experian■	2574.00	31.00	3707.00	2203.00	2.01	20.70	3550.50
Hays	61.95	-0.05	78.45	28.68	0.71	-17.02	2763.48
Howden Joinery	748.00	-6.50	981.00	713.00	2.94	15.20	909.38
Intertek	5980.00	-10.00	5900.00	3519.42	2.80	27.01	113.72
Johnson Service●	135.60	-1.80	172.10	123.80	3.69	14.58	1306.14
MITIE Group	210.20	-0.20	214.00	134.80	2.14	31.85	3839.73
RS Group	750.00	-6.50	790.00	536.90	3.05	21.68	1390.85
Vp	532.00	20.00	608.00	420.00	7.42	-38.55	8.02

Tech - Software & Services
Computacenter•	5485.00	35.00	6045.00	2578.00	1.42	37.44	426.66
NCC Group•	149.00	-0.20	161.60	107.20	3.12	26.61	758.43
The Sage Grp	1027.50	5.50	1181.00	771.66	2.18	27.23	4099.89
Triad Group	380.00	-	430.00	236.00	2.37	38.31	0.04
Telecommunications
Airtel Africa	309.60	-3.20	436.20	219.00	1.73	22.02	6904.27
BT Group	197.45	-1.00	242.09	173.00	4.21	17.95	20293.44
Telecom Plus	839.00	-11.00	1896.00	638.00	5.96	8.29	561.11
Vodafone	124.40	-3.35	132.07	83.40	3.19	-88.97	45969.79
Tobacco

Brit Amer Tobacco■	4161.00	77.00	5326.00	3677.00	5.89	11.85	5977.63
Imperial Brands	2614.00	126.00	3632.04	2408.00	6.38	10.41	4683.72
Travel & Leisure
easyJet	681.00	1.40	683.80	332.60	1.94	10.35	3178.55
FirstGroup	187.00	0.40	222.60	152.10	3.85	8.74	1122.77
Fullers 'A'	708.00	6.00	780.00	570.00	2.99	18.05	28.70
IntContl Hotels	11907.90	-207.24	13305.06	8762.00	1.18	32.08	172.30
Intl Cons Air	420.00	-12.80	492.90	332.70	1.60	6.95	11772.07
Whitbread	2445.00	-27.00	3278.00	2098.00	3.97	19.83	507.39
Utilities
Drax Group▲	780.50	4.50	937.50	695.50	3.88	37.71	550.53
National Grid▲	1152.50	2.50	1428.50	1086.25	4.21	17.60	6586.37
Pennon	371.00	9.80	606.00	340.00	7.89	19.12	10761.98
Severn Trent	3096.00	38.00	3335.00	2381.00	4.07	25.07	1287.51
SSE	2437.00	-22.00	2767.50	1760.00	2.82	23.10	2877.76

	Price	+/- Dly Chg	52 Week		Yld	P/E	Vol 000s
			High	Low
Support Services
Christie●	180.00	-	199.60	90.00	2.22	35.43	0.66
LonSec	3750.00	-	3900.00	2100.00	2.59	19.33	-
NWF	160.00	3.00	187.50	110.00	5.44	8.60	123.79
Petards	8.50	-	12.50	7.00	-	-12.69	65.39
Renew	946.00	-19.00	1016.00	821.00	2.15	15.34	86.72
Tech - Software & Services

Oxford Metrics	34.90	-	60.40	34.90	9.31	-63.45	82.04
Travel & Leisure
Gaming Realms	31.80	0.20	47.20	29.00	-	15.66	105.87
Jet2♦	1414.00	-6.00	1612.00	980.00	1.20	6.70	334.42

Guide to FT Share Service

All data is as of close of the previous business day. Company classifications are based on the ICB system used by FTSE. FSTE 100 constituents are shown in bold. Closing prices are shown in pence unless otherwise indicated. Highs & lows are based on intra-day trading over a rolling 52 week period. Price/earnings ratios (P/E) are based on latest annual reports and accounts and are updated with interim figures. P/E is calculated using the company's diluted earnings from continuing operations. Yields are based on closing price and on dividends paid in the last financial year and updated with interim figures. Yields are shown in net terms; dividends on UK companies are net of 10% tax, non-UK companies are gross of tax. Highs & lows, yields and PER are adjusted to reflect capital changes where appropriate. Trading volumes are end of day aggregated totals, rounded to the nearest 1,000 shares. Net asset value per share (NAV) and split analytics are provided only as a guide. Discounts and premiums are calculated using the latest cum fair net asset value estimate and closing price. Discounts, premiums, gross redemption yield (GRY) and hurdle rate (HR) to share price (SP) and HR to wipe out (WO) are displayed as a percentage, NAV in pence.

- trading ex-dividend

■ trading ex-capital distribution

price at time of suspension from trading

The prices listed are indicative and believed accurate at the time of publication. No offer is made by ICE or the FT. The FT does not warrant nor guarantee that the information is reliable or complete. The FT does not accept responsibility and will not be liable for any loss arising from the reliance on or use of the information.

■ trading ex-capital distribution

The FT Share Service is a paid-for print listing service and may not be fully representative of all LSE-listed companies. This service is available to all listed companies, subject to the Editors discretion. For new sales enquiries please email data@ft.com. For further information contact newspapers@ice.com

Data provided by

Markets and data happen here.

www.ice.com

FINANCIAL TIMES

IS YOUR SHARE PRICE BEING NOTICED?

The Financial Times Share Service sections help you to reach and engage financially aware decision-makers and affluent shareholders from across the world in print and online.

To advertise contact carol.ramsey@ft.com

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund

MANAGED FUNDS SERVICE

The Ground Truth image displays a single, solid horizontal line, which is a stylistic or background element (like a rule line on paper). According to Rule 2, such lines must be ignored by the OCR result. The OCR content provided is "", which consists of no characters. Since the OCR output correctly ignores the stylistic line, it complies with Rule 2. Therefore, the OCR result is consistent with the Ground Truth.

Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m Fund
Bid Offer +/- Yield 24m 36m

$\alpha$ lgebris INVESTMENTS

Candriam Investors Group

Algebris Core Italy I EUR	€	242.59	-	-6.91	0.00	26.10	18.59
Algebris Core Italy R EUR	€	223.76	-	-6.38	0.00	25.17	17.71
Algebris Financial Credit I EUR	€	225.85	-	-0.36	0.00	5.47	8.85
Algebris Financial Credit I GBP	£	200.37	-	-0.31	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Credit I USD	$	208.95	-	-0.33	5.86	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Credit R EUR	€	189.69	-	-0.35	0.00	4.79	8.21
Algebris Financial Equity B EUR	€	371.56	-	-5.47	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Equity R EUR	€	300.75	-	-4.43	0.00	28.23	29.62
Algebris Financial Equity Fund B GBP	£	311.08	-	-4.55	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Equity Fund B USD	$	469.37	-	-6.85	3.90	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Income I EUR	€	296.43	-	-2.21	0.00	15.66	17.95
Algebris Financial Income R EUR	€	260.59	-	-1.95	0.00	14.63	16.90
Algebris Financial Income Fund I GBP	£	218.13	-	-1.61	6.02	0.00	0.00
Algebris Financial Income Fund I USD	$	249.26	-	-1.83	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities I EUR	€	152.34	-	-0.04	0.00	2.83	5.54
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities R EUR	€	145.93	-	-0.04	0.00	2.29	5.02
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities I GBP	£	151.97	-	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris Global Credit Opportunities I USD	$	156.84	-	-0.04	0.00	0.00	0.00
Algebris IG Financial Credit I EUR	€	118.14	-	-0.11	0.00	3.74	6.68
Algebris IG Financial Credit R EUR	€	114.10	-	-0.12	0.00	3.22	6.15
Algebris Strategic Credit Fund R EUR	€	113.68	-	-0.19	0.00	2.31	4.66
Algebris Global Equity Select B EUR	€	153.94	-	-2.92	0.00	8.44	11.42
Algebris Global Equity Select R EUR	€	146.23	-	-2.78	0.00	7.05	9.99

Blue Whale Investment Funds ICAVwww.bluewhale.co.uk info@bluewhale.co.uk							(IRE)
FCA Recognised-Ireland UCITS
Blue Whale Growth USD T	$	25.22	-	-0.27	0.00	0.00	0.00

CG Portfolio Fund PLC
Absolute Return M Inc	£	144.25	-	-0.23	2.61	2.86	2.38
Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP P	£	39528.49	-	-62.27	1.95	2.82	2.27
Capital Gearing Portfolio GBP V	£	192.28	-	-0.30	1.94	2.84	2.28
Dollar Fund Cis D Inc	£	153.04	-	0.31	2.82	-1.10	-2.24
Dollar Hedged GBP Inc	£	92.57	-	0.07	2.54	-0.01	-0.63
Real Return Cls A Inc	£	183.11	-	0.30	2.55	-0.68	-2.19
UK Index-Linked Bond G Inc	£	105.11	-	0.01	2.10	0.77	0.00

Canaccord WEALTH

Chartered Asset Management Pte Ltd

Other International Funds
CAM-GTF VCC	$ 477779.20	47779.20	0.00	0.00	0.49	3.79
CAM Gti VCC	$ 1755.82	-	0.00	0.00	20.88	4.69
RAIC VCC	$ 1.90	-	-0.04	0.00	8.97	-1.66

Authorised Inv Funds
EdenTree Global Impact Bond	84.15	-	-0.13	4.34	-1.76	-0.43
EdenTree Green Impact Equity	132.10	-	-1.70	0.95	7.22	8.73
EdenTree Green Impact Infrastructure	75.60	-	-0.47	6.81	-4.09	-7.16
EdenTree Global Sustainable Government Bond	94.41	-	-0.03	3.18	0.00	0.00
EdenTree Sustainable European Equity A	469.70	-	-4.20	1.94	10.17	12.08
EdenTree Sustainable European Equity B	475.00	-	-4.30	0.00	10.16	12.07
EdenTree Sustainable Global Equity A	459.60	-	-3.60	0.53	9.53	9.48
EdenTree Sustainable Global Equity B	464.00	-	-3.60	0.95	9.51	9.48
EdenTree Sustainable Managed Income A	133.50	-	-0.80	4.21	3.04	3.02
EdenTree Sustainable Managed Income B	144.80	-	-0.90	4.17	3.51	3.43
EdenTree Sustainable Short Dated Bond	94.41	-	-0.08	4.64	-0.24	0.63
EdenTree Sustainable Sterling Bond A	82.27	-	-0.21	5.11	-1.77	-0.28
EdenTree Sustainable Sterling Bond B	95.02	-	-0.24	5.11	-1.18	0.32
EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity A	246.30	-	-1.10	1.82	4.41	3.48
EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity B	245.70	-	-1.10	2.20	2.58	3.44
EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity Opp A	318.00	-	-1.20	1.53	1.70	4.85
EdenTree Sustainable UK Equity Opp B	324.80	-	-1.20	1.99	1.67	4.83

Canaccord Wealth International Multi Strategy Funds Limited
Balanced Strategy	£	1.19	-	0.00	0.00	11.61	11.20
Balanced Strategy A	£	1.19	-	0.00	1.84	8.57	8.74
Cautious Balanced Strategy	£	1.48	-	0.00	0.91	8.99	8.97
Cautious Balanced Strategy A	£	1.06	-	0.00	1.84	6.66	7.14
Growth Strategy	£	2.70	-	-0.01	0.76	1.61	5.68
Growth Strategy A	£	1.29	-	0.00	0.54	10.51	11.01
High Growth Strategy GBP	£	4.00	-	-0.01	0.24	14.83	14.94
High Growth Strategy A	£	1.37	-	0.00	0.52	12.56	12.43
High Income Bond Fund B Monthly	£	0.97	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
High Income Bond Fund B Quarterly	£	0.97	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
US$ Growth Strategy	$	2.57	-	-0.01	0.21	14.46	14.73

CP Global Asset Management Pte.Ltd.

www.cpglobal.com.sg, Email: customer_support@cpglobal.com.sg

International Mutual Funds

Dealing Daily. Initial Charge Nil for A classes and up to $2\%$ for other classes.

CP Capital Asset Management Limited

International Mutual Funds
CP Dual-Purpose Fund	$	217.88	-	-0.06	0.00	0.00
CP Global Alpha Fund	$	509.96	-	-0.15	0.00	11.19
CPS-Master Private Fund	$	616.61	-	-0.02	0.00	11.01

Artemis Corporate Bond I Acc	116.66	-	-0.33	0.00	4.24	5.74
Artemis Global Income I Dis	236.65	-	-3.86	0.00	2.17	0.50
Artemis High Income I Q Inc	73.58	-	-0.18	0.23	1.20	2.19
Artemis Income I Inc	342.71	-	-0.49	5.48	9.44	10.38
Artemis Monthly Dist I Inc	100.02	-	-0.85	0.00	12.09	12.50
Artemis Short-Dn Strat Bond	132.86	-	-0.14	0.00	5.72	6.91
Artemis SmartGARP Eur Eq I Acc	969.74	-	-10.99	0.00	23.96	26.36
Artemis SmartGARP Global Small Co I Acc	263.39	-	-2.77	1.95	15.16	14.90
Artemis SmartGARP GloEmr Eq I Acc	360.94	-	0.00	0.00	32.68	27.08
Artemis SmartGARP Glo Eq I Acc	825.11	-	-6.12	0.00	28.86	26.87
Artemis SmartGARP UK Eq I Acc	4649.63	-	-39.94	2.41	24.25	22.86
Artemis Strategic Assets I Acc	111.33	-	0.03	0.00	3.79	3.35
Artemis Strategic Bond I Q Acc	123.60	-	-0.23	4.46	5.49	6.19
Artemis UK Select Fund Class I Acc	1406.19	-	-24.41	0.00	6.88	18.32
Artemis UK Smaller Cos I Acc	2627.85	-	-15.53	1.81	4.39	8.93
Artemis UK Special Sits I Acc	1186.05	-	-11.68	0.00	10.79	13.45
Artemis US Extended Alpha I Acc	600.90	-	-5.09	0.00	15.62	18.59
Artemis US Select I Acc	590.60	-	-5.83	0.00	21.00	21.92
Artemis US Smir Cos I Acc	515.25	-	-8.91	0.00	20.33	19.53

ASB Capital
Gate Village 5, Level 4, Unit 11, DIFC,Dubai United Arab Emirateswww.asbc.com
ASB SUKUK - ACC	$ 101.91	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
ASB SUKUK - DIST	$ 94.08	-	0.00	0.50	0.00	0.00
ASB State Street Global Equity	$ 125.11	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
ASB Global Technology	$ 167.71	-	-1.72	0.00	0.00	0.00
ASB MENA Equity	$ 98.25	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

ASB Capital

Other International Funds
American Dynamic	$ 9087.20	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
American One	$ 11100.38	-	0.00	0.00	12.41	14.22
Bond Global	€ 1646.01	-	0.00	0.00	0.73	6.90
Eurocroissance	€ 1311.23	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Far East	$ 1267.36	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00

CANDRIAM

Candriam Investors Group								(LUX)
FCA Recognised
Candriam Abs Ret Eqt Mkt Neutral-C Cap	€	222.49	-	0.00	0.00	1.21	2.87
Candriam Bds Euro High Yield Cap	€	1427.94	-	0.00	0.00	3.90	5.97
Candriam Bonds Gbl Hi Yield -C Cap	€	284.09	-	-0.50	0.00	3.59	5.71
Candriam Bonds Glbl Infl Sh Dton-I-Cap	€	164.42	-	0.17	0.00	2.37	3.01
Candriam Bonds Total Return-C-Cap	€	143.38	-	0.16	0.00	1.73	2.84
Candriam Diversified Futures-I-Cap	€	14366.83	-	0.00	0.00	1.43	-1.29
Candriam Eqts L Australia Cap A$	A$	2322.15	-	-28.13	0.00	7.81	8.34
Candriam Eqts L Emerging Mkts Cap	€	1584.15	-	-26.05	0.00	27.77	21.76
Candriam Equities L Biotech-C-Cap	€	1303.21	-	2.47	0.00	23.20	23.33
Candriam Equities L Europe Innov-R-Cap	€	255.90	-	-0.46	0.00	-3.37	1.14
Candriam Index Arbitrage -C-Cap	€	1532.00	-	0.81	0.00	1.16	2.25
Candriam Long Short Credit R-Cap	€	120.54	-	-0.02	0.00	2.99	3.84
Candriam Risk Arbitrage-C-Cap	€	2775.19	-	-0.68	0.00	2.97	3.77
Candriam Sust Bond Emerg Mkts I Dist	€	748.47	-	-1.36	0.00	4.48	3.35
Candriam Sust Bond Euro Corp R Cap	€	110.12	-	-0.10	0.00	2.50	4.27
Candriam Sust GlbHighYield-I-Cap	€	1237.46	-	-1.80	0.00	2.98	4.78
Candriam Eq Crl Econ-R-Cap	€	158.62	-	-1.60	0.00	4.22	6.18
Candriam Eq Clmt Action I-Cap	€	2145.95	-	-25.49	0.00	12.27	11.32
Candriam Sust Eq Emerging Mkts C-Cap	€	193.23	-	-3.76	0.00	25.10	18.21
Candriam Sust Eq EMU-C-Cap	€	216.05	-	-3.38	0.00	8.17	9.57
Candriam Sust Eurp S&M Caps-I-Cap	€	2400.21	-	-36.81	0.00	0.38	1.86
Candriam Sust Eq World-C-Cap	€	48.07	-	0.08	0.00	12.07	14.27
NYLIM GF US High YieldCorp Bond-R-Cap	€	171.74	-	-0.14	0.00	5.36	7.10

Other International Funds
Candriam Bds Euro Sh.Term Cap	€	2180.87	-	1.08	0.00	2.08	2.86
Candriam Bonds Credit Opportunities	€	220.76	-	-0.04	0.00	2.61	3.48
Candriam Bonds Emerg Mkt-C-Cap	$	2986.25	-	-8.57	0.00	6.44	9.61
Candriam Equities L Eurp Opt Olt -I-Cap	€	249.62	-	-1.62	0.00	7.61	6.40
Candriam Equities L Global Demg R Cap	€	405.30	-	-0.29	0.00	10.31	13.28
Candriam Equities Onco impt-I-Cap	$	3524.36	-	20.23	0.00	7.99	12.21
Candriam Equities L Robt&InnTech I Cap	$	8327.36	-	-75.80	0.00	32.27	28.83

Dodge & Cox® Worldwide Funds

Cantab Asset Management Ltd(UK)01223 522000www.cantabam.com
FCA Recognised
VT Cantab Balanced A GBP Acc	142.13	-	-0.33	1.80	9.90	9.30
VT Cantab Moderate A GBP Acc	139.49	-	-0.25	2.12	9.09	8.09
VT Cantab Sustainable Gbl Eq A GBP Acc	169.98	-	-0.12	1.37	8.80	9.07

Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds	(IRL)
48-49 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5JG
www.dodgeandcox.com +44 0203 642 3370
ECA Recognised

Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Emerging Markets Stock Fund
Emerging Markets Stock Fund A USD Acc	$	16.25	-	-0.14	0.00	26.07
Emerging Markets Stock Fund A GBP Acc	£	17.39	-	-0.07	0.00	24.11
Emerging Markets Stock Fund D GBP Dis	£	15.67	-	-0.06	1.69	21.49
Emerging Markets Stock Fund A EUR Acc	€	17.63	-	-0.06	1.51	24.28

Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Global Bond Funds
EUR Accumulating Class	€	18.43	-	0.10	0.00	3.41	4.17
EUR Accumulating Class (H)	€	11.89	-	0.00	0.00	2.89	3.51
EUR Distributing Class	€	11.22	-	0.06	0.00	-1.55	-0.73
EUR Distributing Class (H)	€	7.18	-	0.00	5.05	-2.11	-1.37
GBP Distributing Class	£	11.65	-	0.05	4.75	-1.74	-1.41
GBP Distributing Class (H)	£	8.15	-	0.00	4.70	-0.26	0.18
USD Accumulating Class	$	14.89	-	0.00	0.00	4.88	5.50
CHF Distributing Class (H)	Sfr	7.30	-	-0.01	0.00	-4.47	-3.86

Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-Global Stock Funds
USD Accumulating Share Class	$	48.19	-	-0.45	0.00	13.46	15.84
GBP Accumulating Share Class	£	59.99	-	-0.27	0.00	11.69	13.68
GBP Distributing Share Class	£	38.35	-	-0.17	0.00	9.04	12.05
EUR Accumulating Share Class	€	64.65	-	-0.23	0.00	12.71	13.18
GBP Distributing Share Class (H)	£	20.71	-	-0.19	0.00	11.44	13.52
USD Distributing Class	$	19.68	-	-0.18	0.00	11.91	14.24
CAD Accumulating Class	C$	64.85	-	-0.38	0.00	15.48	17.49

Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds-US Stock Fund
USD Accumulating Share Class	$	58.23	-	-0.34	0.00	10.80	14.05
GBP Accumulating Share Class	£	68.56	-	-0.06	0.00	9.08	11.93
GBP Distributing Share Class	£	39.89	-	-0.03	0.00	8.24	11.03
EUR Accumulating Share Class	€	67.44	-	0.00	0.00	8.37	12.17
GBP Distributing Share Class (H)	£	21.97	-	-0.13	0.00	9.43	12.58
USD Distributing Class	$	21.30	-	-0.13	0.00	9.95	13.10

OEIC Funds
Allocator World Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	4.36	-	-0.04	0.98	15.73	15.88
American Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	90.07	-	-0.94	0.00	11.62	13.58
American Special Sits W-Acc-GBP	£	28.91	-	-0.29	0.42	7.07	9.14
Asia Funds W-Acc-GBP	£	29.65	-	-0.54	0.49	36.18	25.82
Asia Pacific Opps W-Acc	£	3.27	-	-0.05	0.70	11.09	7.55
Asian Dividend Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	3.65	-	-0.03	2.04	23.48	18.79
Cash Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	1.22	-	0.00	3.83	0.00	0.00
China Fund W-Accumulation-GBP	£	2.43	-	-0.01	1.54	14.11	1.37
Emerging Mkts NAV		1679.50	-	-5.32	0.00	0.00	0.00
Enhanced Income Fund W-Inc-GBP	£	0.92	-	0.00	6.21	-1.45	-1.96
European Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	30.91	-	-0.42	1.52	6.13	8.84
Global High Income Bond W-Acc-GBP	£	1.55	-	0.00	5.74	5.24	7.40
Sustainable Euro Equity Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	6.97	-	-0.09	1.20	8.78	9.96
Sustainable Global Equity Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	43.72	-	-0.51	0.30	7.91	8.90
Japan Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	10.74	-	-0.18	0.89	23.47	19.58
Select 50 Balanced Fund PI-Acc-GBP	£	1.52	-	0.00	2.18	0.00	0.00
Special Situations Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	72.37	-	-0.50	2.29	18.33	20.23
Short Dated Corp Bond Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	12.62	-	-0.01	4.81	0.00	0.00
Sustainable Water & Waste W-ACC-GBP		126.60	-	0.00	0.00	7.94	1.31
Sustainable Water & Waste W-INC-GBP		124.00	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
UK Select Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	4.57	-	-0.01	1.77	6.05	8.63
Global Dividend Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	4.54	-	-0.02	2.52	12.64	14.94
Global Enhanced W-ACC-GBP	£	3.49	-	-0.03	4.25	13.19	14.36
Global Special Sits W-ACC-GBP	£	91.93	-	-1.12	0.20	18.41	17.69
Index Emerging Markets P-ACC-GBP	£	2.89	-	-0.05	1.59	25.86	20.18
Index Europe ex UK Markets P-ACC-GBP	£	2.85	-	-0.03	2.18	14.99	14.86
Index Japan P-ACC-GBP	£	3.35	-	-0.02	1.43	18.15	17.38
Index Pacific ex Japan P-ACC-GBP	£	2.55	-	-0.04	2.72	15.27	13.96
Index Sterling Corp Bond Fund P-ACC-GBP	£	0.95	-	0.00	5.30	0.00	0.00
Index UK P-ACC-GBP	£	2.44	-	-0.01	2.73	16.39	16.52
Index US P-ACC-GBP	£	6.37	-	-0.04	0.83	16.58	18.09
Index World P-ACC-GBP	£	4.74	-	-0.04	1.12	16.76	17.60
MoneyBuilder Balanced Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	0.77	-	0.00	2.97	0.00	0.00
MoneyBuilder Dividend Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	1.60	-	0.00	3.71	-0.89	-1.54
Sust. MoneyBuilder Inc Fd Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	14.06	-	-0.03	4.52	3.28	5.58
Multi Asset Alloc Adventurous Fd W-ACC-GBP	£	3.22	-	-0.02	1.14	13.05	13.13
Multi Asset Alloc Defensive Fd W-ACC-GBP	£	1.56	-	0.00	0.00	5.39	5.26
Multi Asset Alloc Growth Fd W-ACC-GBP	£	2.56	-	-0.01	1.12	10.29	10.33
Multi Asset Alloc Strategic Fd W-ACC-GBP	£	2.02	-	-0.01	1.18	6.96	7.50
Multi Asset Balanced Inc Fd W-INC-GBP	£	1.02	-	-0.01	0.00	2.78	2.54
Multi Asset Inc & Growth Fund W-INC-GBP	£	1.31	-	-0.01	2.61	9.84	8.18
Multi Asset Income Fund W-INC-GBP	£	0.90	-	0.00	0.00	1.85	1.35
Multi Asset Open Advent W-ACC-GBP	£	2.50	-	-0.02	1.68	11.91	11.23
Multi Asset Open Defen W-ACC-GBP	£	1.65	-	-0.01	0.00	7.60	6.67
Multi Asset Open GrowthFund W-ACC-GBP	£	2.33	-	-0.02	1.81	11.34	10.66
Multi Asset Open Strat. Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	1.96	-	-0.01	2.41	9.04	8.30
Open World Fund W-Acc-GBP	£	3.46	-	-0.03	0.82	13.03	12.92
Strategic Bond Fund P-Acc-GBP	£	1.36	-	0.00	2.93	3.35	5.54
Index UK Gilt Fund P-Acc-GBP	£	0.75	-	0.00	4.55	1.25	1.65
Sustainable Asia Equity Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	2.80	-	-0.04	0.75	25.35	16.13
Sust Multi Asset Balanced Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	1.22	-	-0.01	1.30	0.00	0.00
Sust Multi Asset Con. Fd W-ACC-GBP	£	1.08	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
Sust Multi Asset Gwth Fd W-ACC-GBP	£	1.34	-	-0.01	1.14	0.00	0.00
UK Opportunities Fund W-ACC-GBP	£	2.63	-	-0.01	2.27	0.00	0.00
UK Smaller Companies W-ACC-GBP	£	4.78	-	-0.05	2.36	6.76	11.33

MANAGED FUNDS SERVICE

SICO Capital KSA
Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited

Fund

Bid

Offer +/-

Yield

24m

36m

Fund

Bid

Offer +/-

Yield

24m

36m

Fund

Bid

Offer +/-

Yield

24m

36m

Fund

Bid

Offer +/-

Yield

24m

36m

Fundsmith LLP (1200)F
PO Box 10846, Chelmsford Essex CM99 2BW 0330 123 1815
www.fundsmith.co.uk, enquiries@fundsmith.co.uk

Authorised Inv Funds
Fundsmith Equity T Acc	710.66	-	-3.61	0.00	0.74	4.20
Fundsmith Equity T Inc	641.41	-	-3.26	0.00	14.09	13.49

Guinness Global Investors
Guinness Global Equity Income Y GBP Dis	£	24.70	-	-0.08	2.05	8.79	11.42
Guinness Global Innovators Y GBP ACC	£	49.41	-	-0.05	0.00	13.54	16.82
Guinness Global Quality Mid Cap Y Gbp Acc	£	16.39	-	-0.22	0.00	12.84	11.97

McInroy & Wood Portfolios Limited
Easter Alderston, Haddington EH41 3SF 01620 825867

Authorised Inv Funds
Balanced Fund Acc	6925.70	-21.30	1.86	4.15	0.00
Balanced Fund Inc	6501.40	-20.00	1.90	2.28	2.41
Emerging Markets Fund ACC	2338.30	-10.20	1.74	2.48	0.00
Emerging Markets Fund Inc	2094.40	-9.20	1.78	0.55	-1.72
Income Fund Acc	3594.10	-14.50	2.73	6.27	0.00
Income Fund Inc	3166.90	-12.80	2.83	3.05	3.11
Smaller Companies Fund Acc	7188.10	-102.20	1.28	3.91	0.00
Smaller Companies Fund Inc	6731.80	-95.70	1.31	2.57	3.23

HPB Assurance Ltd

Ministry of Justice Common Investment Funds					(UK)
Property & Other UK Unit Trusts
The Equity Idx Tracker Fd Inc	2628.00	-	-22.00	2.00	10.03
Distribution Units

International Insurances
Holiday Property Bond Ser 1	£	0.49	-	0.00	0.00	-0.28
Holiday Property Bond Ser 2	£	0.66	-	0.00	0.00	1.43

Purisima Investment Fds (CI) Ltd						(JER)
Regulated
PCG B	572.11	-	-0.03	0.00	15.87	19.99
PCG C	551.88	-	-0.04	0.00	15.61	19.72

Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited
Global Total Fd PCG A	711.25	-	-3.94	0.41	14.69	18.05
Global Total Fd PCG B	700.12	-	-3.88	0.00	14.60	17.98
Global Total Fd PCG INT	682.71	-	-3.80	0.00	14.42	17.79

Royal London
80 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 4BY

Royal London Sustainable Diversified A Inc	286.10	-	-1.70	1.55	4.47	6.02
Royal London Sustainable World A Inc	524.50	-	-2.80	0.71	11.99	12.54
Royal London Corporate Bond Mth Income	74.85	-	-0.20	4.64	-0.81	0.46
Royal London European Growth Trust	280.20	-	-3.00	1.15	8.16	8.98
Royal London Sustainable Leaders A Inc	985.50	-	-5.00	1.50	6.38	6.46
Royal London UK Growth Trust	843.70	-	-5.00	1.73	9.27	9.60
Royal London UK Income With Growth Trust	249.10	-	-0.90	4.07	6.01	6.77
Royal London US Growth Trust	681.90	-	-2.60	0.01	15.48	18.14

Additional Funds Available
Please see www.royallondon.com for details

SF Global Best Ideas Eq B USD Acc	$	299.52	-	-1.43	0.00	4.27	6.31
SF Global Best Ideas Eq D GBP Inc	£	343.76	-	-0.12	0.00	2.64	4.33

Superfund Asset Management GmbH www.superfund.com, +43 (1) 247 00

Janus Henderson INVESTORS

Stonehage Fleming Investment Management Ltd	(IRL)
www.stonehagefleming.com/gbi enquiries@stonehagefleming.com

Superfund Trend Gold	$ 1814.43	-	-21.04	0.00	31.23	31.13
Superfund Trend Silver	$ 1940.83	-	-42.63	0.00	47.57	42.07
Superfund Trend	$ 817.82	-	-0.34	0.00	14.18	8.06
Superfund Bitcoin 0-2x	€ 95.99	-	1.07	0.00	5.72	15.41
Superfund Fund-of-Funds	$ 170.73	-	0.00	0.00	21.89	20.71

www.janushenderson.com
Authorised Inv Funds
Janus Henderson Absolute Return Fund A Acc	206.20	-	-0.30	2.10	5.51	6.50
Janus Henderson Asian Divi Inc Unit Trst Inc	102.20	-	-1.60	5.60	12.06	9.45
Janus Henderson Cautious Mngd Fund A Acc	345.10	-	-1.90	3.80	6.51	8.64
Janus Henderson Cautious Mngd Fund A Inc	148.10	-	-0.80	3.90	1.74	2.30
Janus Henderson China Opp Fund A Acc	1255.00	-	-16.00	0.10	20.42	7.17
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Asia A Acc	1830.00	-	-31.00	0.00	25.49	20.45
Janus Henderson Emerg. Mkts Opps Fnd A Acc	304.80	-	-4.90	0.00	19.33	15.00
Janus Henderson European Focus A Acc	569.40	-	-4.90	0.10	0.00	0.00
Janus Henderson Euro. Sel Opps Fund A Acc	3046.00	-	-28.00	0.20	10.88	11.44
Janus Henderson Fixed Int Mthly Inc Fd Inc	16.54	-	-0.04	6.20	-1.13	-1.16
Janus Henderson Global Equity Inc Fnd Inc	85.91	-	-0.71	2.60	8.49	8.07
Janus Henderson Global Select Fund Acc	6562.00	-	-43.00	0.00	9.80	14.70
Janus Henderson Global Sust Equity Fd A Inc	713.50	-	-4.60	0.00	9.10	12.14
Janus Henderson Global Tech Ldrs Fnd A Acc	7554.00	-	-90.00	0.00	26.59	29.11
Janus Henderson Instl UK Index Opps A Acc	172.54	-	-0.90	2.30	16.08	16.32
Janus Henderson Multi-Asst Abs Rtn Fd A Acc	190.00	-	-0.50	2.70	4.78	4.63
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Actv Fd A Acc	338.60	-	0.00	1.70	8.41	8.82
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Dist Fd A Inc	135.90	-	-0.60	2.60	3.05	2.82
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Div. Fd A Acc	104.70	-	-0.40	3.20	6.39	7.28
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Glbl Sel Fd A Acc	449.30	-	-3.00	0.00	9.85	11.18
Janus Henderson MultMgrInc&Gwth FdA Acc	230.80	-	-1.10	2.60	6.29	6.41
Janus Henderson Multi-MgrInc&Gwth Fd A Inc	160.20	-	-0.70	2.60	3.21	3.14
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Mngd Fd A Acc	406.40	-	0.00	1.40	7.77	8.18
Janus Henderson Multi-Mgr Mngd Fd A Inc	374.90	-	0.00	1.20	6.45	6.75
Janus Henderson Sterling Bond Unit Trust Acc	224.70	-	-0.70	4.30	2.51	4.71
Janus Henderson Sterling Bond Unit Trust Inc	54.28	-	-0.16	4.30	-0.92	0.09
Janus Henderson Strategic Bond Fund A Inc	92.08	-	-0.15	6.10	-2.52	-2.83
Janus Henderson UK Alpha Fund A Acc	192.90	-	-1.80	0.90	11.05	15.10
Janus Henderson UK Eq Inc & Growth Fd A Inc	673.30	-	-6.10	3.30	7.18	9.64
Janus Henderson US Growth Fund A Acc	3148.00	-	-22.00	0.00	12.83	16.77

Nutshell Asset Management Ltd							(IRL)
Nutshell Asset Management Ltd, Ivybridge House, 1-5 Adam Street, London WC2N 6LEwww.nutshellam.com
Authorised Inv Funds
Nutshell Growth Fund Gbp Inst Founder	£	193.29	-	-0.53	0.00	16.03	17.23

Ruffer LLP (1000) F

Superfund Blockchain	€	24.65	-	0.05	0.00	18.89	33.72
Superfund Gold Silver + Mining	€	19.33	-	0.08	0.00	26.30	27.06
Superfund Quadriga All Seasons	€	15.00	-	0.07	0.00	15.50	17.24
Superfund Inflation	Sfr	11.27	-	0.04	0.00	9.02	8.25

Ruffer LLP (1000) F
3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL
Order Desk and Enquiries: 0345 601 9610

Private Fund Mgrs (Guernsey) Ltd							(GSY)
Regulated
Monument Growth 06/10/2026	£	612.77	618.47	0.00	1.05	3.09	2.98

Regulated
Oasis Crescent Global Eq Fd (USD) A (Dist)	$	56.09	-	-0.43	0.00	17.96
Oasis Crescent Global Inc Fd (USD) A Dist	$	9.95	-	-0.01	0.00	-0.65
Oasis Crescent Low Equity Fund (USD) D Dist	$	15.91	-	-0.11	0.00	9.24
Oasis Crescent Med Equity Fd (USD) A Dist	$	18.62	-	-0.16	0.00	11.27
Oasis Crescent Prop Equity Fd (USD) A Dist	$	10.14	-	-0.13	0.00	6.84
Oasis Crescent Short Term Inc Fd (USD) A (Dist)	$	0.95	-	0.00	0.00	0.37
Oasis Crescent Variable Fund (USD) A (Dist)	£	12.09	-	-0.07	0.00	6.87

Authorised Inv Funds

Authorised Corporate Director-Waystone Management (UK) Limited
WS Ruffer Total Return C Acc	587.10	-	0.00	2.16	4.90	4.23
WS Ruffer Total Return C Inc	338.68	-	0.00	2.19	1.76	0.57

SICO BSC BHRTelephone - +973 1751 5700Website - www.sicobank.com						(BHR)
Khaleej Equity Fund	$	570.76	-	-33.51	0.00	-3.81
Sico Gulf Equity Fund	$	202.34	-	3.72	0.00	10.57

SICO Capital KSA							(KSA)
Telephone - +966 11 521 3835Website - www.sicocapital.com
SICO Kingdom Equity Fund	SAR	10.28	-	-0.39	0.00	1.39	-
SICO MENA Equity Fund	SAR	21.34	-	-0.39	0.00	-1.37	4.80
SICO Capital Money Market	SAR	14.02	-	-0.15	0.00	-	-

Troy Asset Management (1200)

3rd Floor, Central Square, Wellington Street, Leeds LS1 4DL Order Desk and enquiries 0345 608 0950

Trojan Investment Funds
Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Acc	110.02	-	-0.27	3.09	-2.03	2.86
Trojan Ethical Global Inc O Inc	96.89	-	-0.24	3.15	-3.45	-0.33
Trojan Ethical O Acc	157.52	-	-0.04	0.68	7.54	7.69
Trojan Ethical O Inc	152.07	-	-0.03	0.68	5.36	6.32
Trojan Ethical Income O Acc	165.42	-	0.13	2.62	3.73	6.52
Trojan Ethical Income O Inc	124.47	-	0.09	2.71	0.99	3.70
Trojan Fund Acc	460.95	-	0.06	0.81	7.02	6.77
Trojan Fund Inc	360.98	-	0.06	0.89	7.54	5.01
Trojan Global Income O Acc	169.61	-	-0.06	3.42	1.03	3.50
Trojan Global Income O Inc	125.92	-	-0.03	3.50	-2.11	0.27
Trojan Income O Acc	389.59	-	0.16	2.85	3.86	6.15
Trojan Income O Inc	171.65	-	0.07	2.96	-0.53	2.15

Troy Asset Management (1100)	(IRL)
Kilmore House, Spencer Dock, North Wall Quay, Dublin 1, D01 YE64, Ireland Enquiries +353 (0) 1672 1600
FCA Recognised Funds

Management Company - Universal Investment Ireland

Trojan Funds (Ireland) Plc
Trojan Europe O EUR Acc	€	1.0205	-	0.00	0.00	0.00
Trojan Exclusions X GBP Acc	£	1.3176	-	0.00	0.00	6.58
Trojan Global Equity O GBP Acc	£	5.9603	-	0.01	0.20	-0.50
Trojan (Ireland) O GBP Acc	£	1.8517	-	0.00	0.00	5.62

Guide to FT Funds Data

The fund prices quoted on these pages are supplied by the fund operators, fund managers and fund administrators. Details of funds published on these pages, including prices, are for the purpose of information only and should only be used as a guide. The Financial Times Limited makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness and they should not be relied upon when making an investment decision. The sale of interests in the funds listed on these pages may, in certain jurisdictions, be restricted by law and the funds will not necessarily be available to persons in all jurisdictions in which the publication circulates. Persons in any doubt should take appropriate professional advice. Data collated by ICE. The fund prices published in this edition along with additional information are also available on the Financial Times website, www.ft.com/funds. The funds published on these pages are grouped together by fund management company. Prices are in pence unless otherwise indicated. The change, if shown, is the change on the previously quoted figure (not all funds update prices daily). Those designated \$ with no prefix refer to US dollars. Yield percentage figures (in Tuesday to Saturday papers) allow for buying expenses.

Prices of certain older insurance linked plans might be subject to capital gains tax on sales.

OEIC: Open-Ended Investment Company. Similar to a unit trust but using a company rather than a trust structure. Different share classes are issued to reflect a different currency, charging structure or type of holder. Bid price: Also called selling price. The price at which units in a unit trust are sold by investors. Offer price: Also called buying price. The price at which units in a unit trust are bought by investors. Includes manager's initial charge. Single price: Based on a mid-market valuation of the underlying investments. The buying and selling price for shares of an OEIC and units of a single priced unit trust are the same. Treatment of manager's periodic capital charge: 24 and 36 months: 24 and 36 month annualized performance figures calculated using the total gain (or loss) from that period. Performance formula is adjusted to consider the income distribution during the reference period. Yield: Calculating using the fund's projected annual income, divided by the latest available net asset value.

The prices appearing in the newspaper are the most recent provided by the managers/operators. Charges for this advertising service are based on the number of lines published and the classification of the fund. Please contact data@ft.com for further information. For further queries contact newspapers@ice.com

Data provided by

Transparency. Price discovery. Innovation.

Markets and data happen here.

ice.com

www.ice.com

[EMPTY]

Newly restored Palm Houses offer an oasis of calm in Edinburgh

Highlight of the Royal Botanic Garden is an architectural marvel and a sanctuary for biodiversity, says Nathalie Thomas

Every one of the 600 plant specimens in the newly restored Palm Houses at Edinburgh's Royal Botanic Garden has a remarkable story.

Take the Lion's plant, or Valdivia gayana. The leaves look similar to those of a common primrose but seeds for this perennial with vibrant pink flowers, endangered in its native Chile, were harvested by botanists from plants growing on one surface of a cave in the South American country. They were brought to Edinburgh and propagated “en masse”, says Professor Julia Knights, Regius Keeper of the RBGE, before some seeds were sent back to Chile to boost the Lion's plant population in other areas of the country.

“This is an example of the conservation efforts that all our team members are undertaking around the world to save plants,” says Knights, who picks the “unassuming” little plant as one of her favourites in the 19th-century Palm Houses.

The Palm Houses are one of the highlights of the RBGE, a 70-acre garden whose own roots date back more than 350 years and which has long been a favourite among locals and visitors to Scotland's capital city.

Visitor numbers to the garden, a mile north of the city centre, are especially high during the summer months when its tranquillity provides a welcome respite from the joyful chaos of Edinburgh's famous arts festivals.

The name “Palm Houses” is slightly misleading. Yes, there are many magnificent palms striving to reach the A-listed glass and iron ceiling, which reaches nearly 22 metres at its highest point, making it one of the tallest stone and glass structures in the world. But ferns, begonias, conifers and even liverworts are also housed beneath the daylight-flooded cathedral-like structure, each with their own intrigues.

Just a few metres away from the Lion's plant, for example, is a deep green Cook pine from New Caledonia in the South Pacific, a conifer with needlelike leaves that grows in the direction of the equator rather than towards the light.

“It’s the only plant we know of [in science] that grows towards the equator, which is quite fun,” says Knights. “We call it the wonky tree because it grows in an unusual direction.”

In all, plants from more than 35 countries are contained in the Palm Houses, which have quite the story of their own.

There were originally two RBGE Palm Houses, now consolidated into just one building after a painstaking five-year restoration. The initial octagonal structure dates from 1834. A second, taller structure was finished in 1858 at a time when the Victorians had a craze for ferns – a fashion so widespread that Charles Kingsley, a Victorian novelist, coined the term “pteridomania”.

Walking around the Palm Houses, it is easy to see why the Victorians were so mad about ferns: the almost alien-like, tightly curled fronds provide an interesting contrast to the exotic, elegant palms.

The RBGE has one of the world's leading collections of ferns, which, since the height of their popularity in Victorian times, have tended to be “sidelined” in favour of flowering plants, says the RBGE’s glasshouse curator Sadie Bar-

Flora cathedral: Edinburgh is home to one of the tallest stone and glass structures in the world — RBGE

FT Globetrotter for coffee, cocktails, power dining, running, exercise classes, travelling green and much more.

ber. Now, though, they are “becoming recognised as a really important group of plants”.

Ferns, which reproduce from tiny spores rather than seeds, are known not only as natural air purifiers but as great survivors, too. There is fossilised evidence of members of the fern family from around 360 million years ago.

“Because they are just spores in the ground, anything could happen to the earth and the ferns would come back,” adds Barber.

During the restoration of the Palm Houses, more than 5,000 panes of glass were replaced, while much of the ironwork and sandstone had to be either restored or substituted as the structures had weathered over time and were damaged by storms.

Another perilous task was moving all the plants – originally 800 specimens – and housing them temporarily in nearby glasshouses to allow for the construction work. Amateur gardeners will be well acquainted with the frustration of moving healthy plants only to find they wilt in their new environment for little or no reason. This was the same task on a mammoth scale.

“We're the custodians [of the plants] and it's quite a responsibility,” said David Knott, director of horticulture, when asked about the move.

Not every plant made it. Not least the Palm Houses' best-known former inhabitant: a 200-year-old Sabal mexicana that towered to the roof but was too tall and elderly to be moved. Fortunately, the Sabal mexicana is a fairly common species of palm. Visitors with fond memories of the old tree are able to see its 10-year-old offspring instead.

Other plants were purposely not returned to allow those that were – and visitors – more space and light.

The RBGE was founded as a “physic” garden in 1670 to grow plants for use by surgeons and medical students. These days themes of conservation, resilience and the changing climate are evident throughout the wider garden, which intentionally includes the remains of what was once a 30-metre-tall Himalayan cedar, at the time the tallest tree in Edinburgh, before it was felled by a violent storm in January 2025. The effect is powerful: it is a haunting totem that still looms over the rest of the site.

RBGE staff feel the garden can play a particularly important role in preserving species that are endangered elsewhere because of rising temperatures.

Visitors on a blustery, cold, rainy day may not think so but, as Knights says, "we are really lucky here in Scotland. We have got this wonderful climate, it's not too hot here in the summertime."

Next in the queue for renovations will be the research glasshouses, home to a treasure trove of species including rhododendrons, gingers and heathers — other RBGE specialisms.

This is also where 120 or so scientists work behind the scenes trying to make sure that the story is not yet over for some endangered species, as well as continually discovering new information about others.

Back in the Palm Houses, the leaves of a potted Begonia dregei with delicate white flowers from South Africa are just turning from green to a pale red.

"Our scientists have identified over 100 new species [of begonia] and counting," says Knights, calling the tale of the begonia the one that is "closest to [her] heart".

"We are doing a lot of DNA analysis to try and understand a particular question about begonias, which is why do you have some the size of a fingernail and others the size of a car tyre? Why do we have that biodiversity of even shapes and sizes?

"We're losing [some] plants at such a fast rate and yet we don't know everything there is to know about them and that's why these questions are so important," she adds.

The RBGE is open daily (except 25 December and 1 January) from 10am; closing hours are seasonal. Entrance is free but advance booking is advised to see the new Palm Houses. An adult ticket for the Palm Houses costs £4.95 or £5.50 with a donation

The club's extraordinary rise has exposed the growing entanglement of sport, politics and international investment – a transformation that began with its acquisition in 2008. By Josh Noble and Arash Massoudi

Man City, Abu Dhabi and football's future

ust hours after the Premier League charged Manchester City with more than 100 breaches of its financial rules in early 2023, the football club's

chair had an important date in his diary.

Khaldoon al-Mubarak, who is also chief executive of Mubadala, Abu Dhabi's sovereign investment fund, was due to see Jeremy Hunt, then the UK's finance minister. The meeting was part of a broader effort to rebuild confidence less than five months after the disaster of former prime minister Liz Truss's unfunded mini-Budget.

Treasury officials noted at the start that the subject of football should be avoided. Upset at the treatment of his club, Mubarak raised the topic anyway, according to two people with knowledge of the meeting. He described it as an attack on an important Abu Dhabi asset by an unregulated cartel and an affront to some of the emirate's most respected companies, one of the people added.

Hunt stressed that the Premier League was independent and pivoted the conversation back to investment. But Mubarak's pointed comments made it clear that the two issues were not easily separated. The muddying of matters of state with those of a football club shows how much Manchester City's state-backed ownership has transformed the sport, with implications for international relations and investment as well as the rules of the game.

In the wake of a damning report into the club's financial practices last week, the UK government is seeking to protect the independence of British institutions while maintaining good relations with one of the country's most important allies in the Arab world.

'Where there's huge amounts of money, you get huge problems. The question now is: is City too big to fail?'

"The whole question of ownership and the way the game's developed over the last 20 years or so is on the table," said David Bernstein, former chair of City. "Where there's huge amounts of money, you get huge problems. The question now is: is City too big to fail?"

City has been owned by Sheikh Mansour, a member of the Abu Dhabi royal family, since 2008 and now forms the centrepiece of a football empire with a dozen clubs around the world.

Fuelled by his money, the team has broken the hold of the sport's established elite and delivered some of English football's most memorable moments, such as the dramatic close of the 2011-12 season when Argentine striker Sergio Agüero's last-gasp goal secured City's first Premier League title.

The club formed the anchor investment for a broader Abu Dhabi-led regeneration project that helped transform an unloved part of Manchester with new housing, office space and entertainment facilities. City was championed as a template for foreign investment, both by central government and the city's former mayor Andy Burnham, now the UK's prime minister.

Sheikh Mansour's purchase of City was also a watershed moment for sport across the world. It heralded a new age in which countries, especially from the Gulf, used sport as a platform for projecting soft power. In the years that followed, Qatar and Saudi Arabia both bought football clubs, joined Abu Dhabi on the Formula 1 race circuit, signed hundreds of sponsorship deals with teams and leagues, and secured hosting rights for the Fifa World Cup. Three of the past four Champions League finals have been won by teams backed by Gulf money. But City's epic victory in 2012 – and the many titles and cup wins that have followed – are now tainted by one of the biggest cheating scandals in sporting history. Last week's report by an independent commission found that City had been using “sham” contracts to inflate its income and reduce its costs by more than £900mn between 2009-2018, so as to spend far more on players than allowed. Had the club stayed within the rules, Agüero might never have been on the pitch and City might never have become champions.

Thaksin's legal problems in Thailand escalated, and the club was put up for sale just a year later. Two brokers stepped in, British financier Amanda Staveley and Sulaiman al-Fahim, an Emirati property and media mogul who garnered a reputation for living a playboy lifestyle, driving flashy sports cars and mixing with celebrities such as Pamela Anderson. The pair arranged to sell the club to Sheikh Mansour, a senior member of Abu Dhabi's royal family, in a deal finalised just three days after the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. A month later, Staveley was busy negotiating a far bigger transaction that would result in Abu Dhabi investors putting more than £3bn into Barclays as the British bank rushed to avoid a taxpayer bailout. As the global financial crisis raged, Gulf sovereign funds were in the ascendant, pouring money into stricken banks and other entities.

The Premier League's process of approving new owners began with calls to the UK Foreign Office and business department to ask whether a prospective buyer could get the go-ahead to invest in the country, according to those involved at the time. In the case of Sheikh Mansour, the answer from the Labour government led by Gordon Brown, which included business secretary Peter Mandelson and Burnham, then the young secretary for culture, media and sport, was a firm yes.

The UK had become a hot destination for global capital. Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, which also joined the Barclays rescue, had built a significant stake in supermarket chain Sainsbury's a year earlier, and was investing in showpiece assets such as The Shard, the city's tallest building. Football was proving attractive too, with Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich buying Chelsea in 2003 and the Glazer family acquiring Manchester United in 2005.

"The Premier League's approach was that anybody who's got money is wel-

Khaldoon al-Mubarak and Sheikh Mansour helped usher in an era of state-backed ownership at Manchester City Rory Griffiths/FT montage/Getty Images

"There was never any debate around the clubs around whether we should let state-backed owners in," said one senior football executive. "Looking back, did we miss a few things? Definitely."

come. Oligarchs, sovereign wealth, countries – come on in," said the senior football executive. "The culture of the country was to welcome them with open arms, and football mirrors the nation."

Abu Dhabi, the UAE capital, which manages almost \$2tn in sovereign investment funds, has always insisted the City deal was a private transaction.

But as Sheikh Mansour's ownership of the club drew more scrutiny on the traditionally conservative, image-conscious emirate, much of it unwelcome, Fahim was pushed aside and Mubarak, one of Abu Dhabi's most senior officials, was brought in to oversee the project.

Fahim was later jailed in the UAE for stealing £5mn from his wife to fund the purchase of Portsmouth FC. He owned the club for just six weeks in the summer of 2009. In early 2010, it went into administration.

Despite being in his early thirties when he became chair, Mubarak was already a rising star and one of Abu Dhabi's most powerful non-royals, managing multibillion-dollar investment portfolios. He was also a trusted lieutenant of Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, then the emirate's crown prince, who is known as MBZ and was driving the statelet's ambitious development plans. Football opened a new chapter. "We see this as a sound business investment," wrote Sheikh Mansour. "That being said, we understand that we need to put money in to get the club to where we believe it can be."

The big money takeover

The club swiftly became a project integral to managing the carefully crafted Abu Dhabi brand. The deal coincided with MBZ rolling out multibillion-dollar development plans that included a Formula 1 grand prix and outposts of the Louvre and Guggenheim museums. Many of City's sponsors, including airline Etihad and telecoms company Etis-alat, are either state-owned or held by state funds chaired by members of the royal family. Investment also started to arrive in east Manchester, helping the city become the UK's top destination for foreign direct investment outside London. Since the takeover, City's parent company says it has poured more than £1bn into the area, building apartment blocks, office space and a new live music arena. That investment helped feed into the image of Manchester as an economic dynamo and a template that could be copied around the country – an idea that helped propel Burnham all the way to Downing Street.

Behind the scenes, those running City had realised early on that the project would require more money than anticipated. Last week's report by the independent commission noted that by late 2009 the club was finding it “more challenging” than expected to generate income from sponsorship and was now expecting to make significant losses for several years to come.

Cheating begins

There were specific concerns about reporting the biggest annual loss in English football history. The club would need its owner to provide “very significant sums” if it were to stick to its spending plans, but that would fall foul of Uefa’s incoming spending rules.

City was traditionally Manchester's smaller and less fashionable team. Things changed after a military coup in Thailand in 2006, when prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra was ousted and went into exile. In 2007 he bought City. Fans struggling to pronounce his name referred to him affectionately as "Frank Sinatra".

In early 2010, the commission found, club executives devised the “disguised funding scheme” that would make equity payments from the club’s owner appear in the accounts as revenue from sponsors. The commission found that between 2009 and 2018, City reported commercial income of £950mn. But of that, just £119.25mn was actually paid by sponsors.

City executives have always vehemently denied any wrongdoing. The club filed an appeal last week against the commission's findings and has vowed to pursue all legal avenues to clear its name. "The club's firm position is that, on multiple grounds, the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact and is unsafe," it said.

Questions about its finances had dogged the club since soon after the takeover. In 2009, then Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger first accused City of “financial doping”, and in 2011 he called on Uefa to investigate the club’s sponsorship deals.

Yet the City project had been embraced by the British government. Speaking at the opening of the club's new academy, then chancellor George Osborne described the relationship between Manchester City Council and Abu Dhabi United Group, Sheikh Mansour's investment vehicle, as a “benchmark for public-private partnership”.

City's owners also began to expand across the sport, buying up teams in Spain, Australia and the US to form what would become City Football Group, with investments in more than a dozen clubs.

In 2018, the rumours that had swirled around City finally blew up after Portuguese hacker Rui Pinto accessed emails sent by Simon Pearce, a board member at the club and adviser to Mubarak. Pinto shared them with German magazine Der Spiegel, which went on to publish a series of articles alleging that the club had inflated sponsorship incomes and hidden payments. The emails between executives also suggested a culture of impunity and a sense that the rules did not apply.

Uefa opened another investigation, and in 2020 banned City from the Champions League for two years. However, the club appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport and had the ban overturned.

Last week Javier Tebas, president of the Spanish football league, described the court's 2020 ruling as “deeply misguided” and “extraordinarily damaging to the credibility of European football’s economic control system”. He has long warned of the dangers to European football from a failure to control “state-owned clubs”.

In the years since the verdict, the Gulf's influence in sport has grown. Qatar and Saudi Arabia both joined the F1 race calendar in 2021, the same year the Saudi Public Investment Fund acquired Newcastle United. Saudi entities now have more than 300 sponsorship agreements across sport, according to a 2023 report from research group Play the Game, spanning boxing, tennis and beyond.

While some spending on sport has been cut back since the start of the war in the Middle East, notably Riyadh's investment in the now-bankrupt LIV Golf tour, the region's importance to global sport is set to endure. Saudi Arabia will follow in Qatar's footsteps when it hosts the World Cup in 2034, and has weighed up the possibility of an Olympic bid. The International Olympic Committee confirmed Qatar's candidacy for the 2036 Games this week.

'The right side of Daddy'

The Premier League's own investigation into City's finances began in 2018. But it took until February 2023 to charge City with 115 breaches of its financial rule book and refer the club to an independent commission. The verdict took another three and a half years to land but was unequivocal when it did: the commission found the club guilty of virtually all the charges.

The findings throw City's future into uncertainty. Possible sanctions range from fines and points deductions to expulsion from the Premier League. Based on the damning tone of the report, many legal experts expect the punishment to be severe.

The UK's new football regulator last week promised to use its powers to assess the suitability of owners, directors and executives "where there is clear evidence of wrongdoing by individuals". One person close to City said the owners had been initially determined to stay on but noted that fan reaction had been more mixed than expected.

“You’ve got to ask the question, would the owners want to continue?” says Bernstein, whose stint as City’s chair ended in 2003. “This had been great PR for them, but now it’s a disaster.” Burnham, a passionate football fan himself, told the BBC last week he would be “really concerned” if City’s owners were to sell or be forced out, describing them a “huge partner in the building of modern Manchester”. Downing Street later backtracked.

One international executive at a Premier League club says of the UK's relationship with the UAE: "At the end of the day, you guys have to stay on the right side of Daddy." A former UK government official counters that "the idea the UAE is suddenly going to pull investment from the UK is totally overblown."

Still, successive British governments have sought Gulf investment and the saga could hang over UK-UAE relations for the foreseeable future. Some see the City case as the latest sign of a sport that has become lost in a world of money. “I’ve never been more depressed about the future of the game,” says the senior football executive. “I think football is vulnerable now in a way it hasn’t been before.”

Additional reporting by Andrew England, Caroline Binham, Lucy Fisher and George Parker

Since 2008-09, Manchester City have spent more on players than Real Madrid and Barcelona combined

* Amount spent on players bought less received on players sold
Source: Transfermarkt

Manchester City accumulated points faster than most rivals in European club competition between 2012-13 and 2023-24 Uefa club coefficient, rolling five-year total

Uefa calculates the coefficient of each club each season based on the clubs' results in the Uefa Champions League, Uefa Europa League and Uefa Conference League. The combined sum of the five most recent seasons are used to rank the clubs for seeding purposes Source: Uefa

FINANCIAL TIMES 'Without fear and without favour'

ft.com/opinion

Setting up an African rating agency is the easy part

Governments should devote more effort to improving the investment climate

This week, with some fanfare, the African Union launched the Africa Credit Rating Agency (AfCRA). After years of complaining that African sovereigns, corporates and projects pay too much for loans and that lending to the continent is stymied by false perceptions of risk, the new Mauritius-based agency will have a chance to prove Africa's sceptics wrong.

Africa attracts roughly 1 per cent of private global equity despite accounting for about 3 per cent of global output and trade. Even that understates the gap between the continent's huge funding requirements and the availability – and crucially cost – of capital.

It will not be easy for a new credit rating agency to change perceptions of risk. Both China and Europe have sought to create or encourage rating agencies of their own to counter the “big three” US firms — Moody’s, S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings — which account for 95 per cent of global ratings by outstanding debt. They have made only limited inroads mainly because it takes years, if not decades, to build credibility. That is particularly so if the suspicion is that the raison d’être of Africa’s new agency is to provide more favourable ratings to cut the cost of capital.

The existence of an “Africa premium” is debatable. African governments have argued that they pay more for loans than countries with similar risk profiles. But it is hard to say how much of this is due to prejudice or ignorance and how much to real questions about transparency, quality of data and concerns over abrupt policy changes. Nor are the claims and counterclaims easy to disentangle since lower ratings can lead to higher lending costs and thus a greater chance of default, in what amounts to a self-fulfilling prophecy.

If nothing else, an African agency can help foster deeper capital markets by rating debt not covered by the big three. There is an estimated \$4tn in domestic capital pools in Africa, including pension, insurance and sovereign wealth funds, but much is recycled through short-term government debt. Little goes to risk capital.

African governments have complained that the big three agencies lack on-the-ground expertise and engage in what they have disparagingly called “desktop exercises”. Here too, the AfCRA can plausibly fill a gap by producing more granular data.

Still, it will not be easy to overcome the suspicion that Africa simply intends to mark its own homework. To allay such doubts, ratings must be scrupulously objective with entirely transparent methodology.

The AU has made clear that the AfCRA will have no government ownership. That is good. The merest hint that the new agency is beholden to sovereign

Prudent and stable macro policy, clear and transparent rules for investors, fair courts, and reliable power, roads and ports are the building blocks of development, but they are difficult

borrowers would be fatal to its credibility. It is unfortunate then that the list of shareholders was not published before this week's launch. It seems odd to withhold such vital information and raises questions about the new body's financial viability. Nor is it clear whether the AfCRA will have the financial muscle to fund the calibre and quantity of ratings experts it needs to perform more than desktop exercises itself.

Even if the agency can overcome such hurdles, there is a broader point. African governments have spent much political capital on criticising the existing ratings regime. This smacks of shooting the messenger. Far better to put effort into improving the investment climate itself. That means, among other things, prudent and stable macro policy; clear and transparent rules for investors; fair courts; and reliable power, roads and ports. These are the building blocks of development, but they are difficult. By comparison, setting up a rating agency is child's play.

Opinion Trade

Race for the British car market is open – for now

Ann Kiernan

Soumaya Keynes

icture some cars racing to win a trophy: the British market. The stakes are high. Ranked by value, Britain is the third largest vehi-

cle importer in the world. The contest is relatively open. Unlike the French who favour Renaults or the Germans who value Volkswagen, Britons are unpatriotic car buyers. And increasingly, the competition is dangerous. Given the backdrop of geoeconomic tension, the participants will be lucky to avoid a crash.

For years, the EU was the undisputed champion of the UK market, at least when judged by where its cars were made. (Most of the US, Japanese or South Korean brand cars sold in the UK come from factories on the continent.) But since the pandemic and Brexit, the bloc's dominance has waned. Whereas in the 2010s it

The UK has become the top destination for European vehicle exports since the Trump tariffs

contributed some 90 per cent of UK vehicle imports by value, over the past year its share has been below 70 per cent.

The EU is in no mood to lose this race. The UK has become the top destination for its vehicle exports since President Donald Trump's tariffs crushed US sales. Germany is particularly keen to win, having seen its share of exports to the UK fall by more than the EU average since the pandemic. Its sector has been struggling with a years-long downturn, stoking fears of deindustrialisation and diminished economic strength.

The main challenger is, of course, China. After years of cut-throat competition and muscular industrial policy, its carmakers can produce vehicles with tech that makes YouTube reviewers swoon, and batteries for 35 per cent less than Europe. These competitors are also hungry for business given their massive capacity and terrible home demand. Over the first half of this year, car sales in China dropped by 20 per cent year on year. Over that same period, its vehicle exports to the UK grew by over 80 per cent.

It's worth noting that others have it worse than the EU. The value of vehicle imports into the UK from the bloc has grown over the past year, so China has only limited some of the EU's post-pandemic recovery. Over the same period, imports into Britain from Japan, South Africa, Turkey and North America all fell, though from a lower base.

But this won't make anyone in the EU feel better. Coming at the same time as the transition away from internal combustion engine vehicles, this is a race for the future. Splitting the contest by vehicle type, China's export surge has most momentum in the category of hybrid vehicles – which is where EU exports have plateaued.

The bloc has had enough, and wants Britain to intervene. They have asked for tariffs to offset the advantage Chinese producers have had from domestic industrial policy over the years. But even without any “unfairness”, there is an argument for pushing back against Chinese dominance of car production, given its habit of weaponising supply. (Chinese makers already dominate parts of the battery supply chain.)

The British government is mulling tariffs, but is in a tricky spot. It's possible the public could be persuaded. While on a fellowship at the University of Oxford, senior civil servant Jenny Bates told me about her research based on a focus group suggesting voters might accept higher costs if it made the country more secure. But it's also possible that the public really likes cheap cars kitted out with massive flat screens.

The plight of Britain's sputtering car industry doesn't simplify the choice. Production has shrunk from 1.7mn vehicles in 2016 to just 0.7mn in 2025. But since most of this output is exported, the UK industry seems less interested in protection from Chinese competition than in lobbying for lower energy costs and less ambitious green targets, and in attracting Chinese investment.

The EU is pointing to a different race as an incentive for the UK to take action. The bloc's Industrial Accelerator Act is a policy in development, aimed partly at strengthening the European auto industry. If the UK stays open to Chinese cars, it risks being shut out. Given that the EU is the UK's biggest export destination, that would hurt.

Forced into a stark choice between the EU and China, geography, history and ideology all push the UK towards its neighbour. But next time there are demands for tariffs, I would recommend asking a question. What happens if China retaliates by shutting off its market, or worse, its supply chains? The EU is invested in this race. But if there's a crash, will it help to clean up?

soumaya.keynes@ft.com

Letters

History suggests a well-directed escalation can deter Russia

In his guest column “Europe can frustrate Russia’s hybrid war” (Opinion, October 1) Alexander Gabuev argues that in response to the Kremlin’s increasing hybrid warfare attacks, Europe should boost its security and defence capabilities rather than risking escalation with a direct offensive response.

If European policymakers are to try to talk the Kremlin into limiting attacks on civilian and infrastructure targets in Ukraine it certainly makes sense to do so from a position of strength. However, the author

Why public procurement is a double-edged trade tool

I read with interest Peter Foster's recent articles on the UK government's "Buy British" plans (Report, September 22) and the EU's emerging "Made in Europe" initiatives.

The concerns underlying these policies are understandable. As Angus Hanton puts it in his 2024 book Vassal State: How America Runs Britain: “If you have not given contracts to domestic companies they will not be there when you most need them.”

Governments on both sides of the English Channel fear that open procurement markets may have contributed to strategic dependencies and eroded domestic industrial capacity.

There is, however, a complication: international procurement commitments. The EU has opened substantial parts of its procurement markets to trading partners through bilateral and plurilateral agreements. Following Brexit, the UK sought to preserve much of the reciprocal access it had enjoyed as an EU member. The circumstances in which these commitments can be disapplied, including on national security grounds, are relatively narrow.

The Procurement Act 2023 illustrates the tension. It allows a contracting authority to disapply the act, or part of it, to a contract where it determines that this is in the interests of national security.

In principle, this leaves considerable freedom to limit competition to UK suppliers. But that freedom must be exercised consistently with the UK's international obligations, which constrain the circumstances in which suppliers from treaty partners can be excluded.

The same commitments that constrain the UK's freedom to favour domestic suppliers also help secure its companies' access to procurement opportunities abroad. Seeking greater scope to “Buy British” therefore sits uneasily with the legitimate concern that British companies should not be disadvantaged by “Made in Europe” policies.

Procurement can still play an important role in industrial policy. But these initiatives may expose the limits of procurement as an instrument for rebuilding industrial capacity. One alternative would be to adopt more expansive interpretations of the exemptions in those commitments.

Yet, with the boundaries of national security and other exceptions already being tested elsewhere in the international trading system, this approach could have ramifications well beyond public procurement. Totis Kotsonis

Partner, Head of Subsidies, Procurement, Trade Agreements and Trade Remedies, Pinsent Masons, London EC2, UK

exaggerates the risk of an uncontrolled escalation. Fear of escalation is another way of saying that western governments are afraid of their citizens losing their lives in a conflict with a nuclear power. That is understandable.

What is more dangerous for western democracies than uncontrolled escalation however is to signal to the aggressor that if it exerts enough leverage – whether through hybrid attacks, financial threats, cutting off energy supplies or otherwise – sooner or later Europe will crack and offer a deal over the heads of the Ukrainians,

"I CALL IT A JAGUAR"

If you are not satisfied with the FT's response to your complaint, you can appeal to the FT Editorial Complaints Commissioner: complaints.commissioner@ft.com

Nike China strategy heralds a sea change for all brands

Nike is racing to overcome the decline in its revenues in China, in a strategy indicative of the sea change occurring in the global configuration of company value chains (“Nike races to restore its relevance in China”, Report, October 1).

For decades, the manufacturing stages of the value chain of the major advanced economies offshored to China, lured by the attraction of low costs. What is happening now is arguably even more significant. Even as some groups are diversifying their manufacturing operations to locations outside China, an increasing share of the product design and development stages of the value chain are now being located in China by international brands. This is not just to design and create locally for the local Chinese market but also for the global market. Western automakers are a prime example of this nascent trend.

It however remains to be seen whether this strategy on the part of international companies to counter the competition from Chinese challengers can overcome that growing threat in the Chinese market and increasingly beyond. Regardless, international brands are left with little choice but to pursue the migration of their value chains to China.

This reconfiguration poses challenges for advanced economies. The product and development stages of the value chain entail high value activities that offer well-paid employment opportunities. While the offshoring of the manufacturing stages resulted in the large scale hollowing out of manufacturing jobs in advanced economies, a smaller scale fate looms as migration of the design stages of value chains to China becomes more the norm.

Professor Louis Brennan Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland who are making the real sacrifice. In the present stand-off on Ukraine, Nato has not attempted any military counter measures to incursions on the territory of its members, nor even drawn any “red lines” for the Kremlin, leaving the Ukrainian armed forces alone to show that they can hit back effectively.

In fact, history teaches us that a well-directed escalation can work in forcing the Kremlin to back off. In August 1968 Alexander Dubček and his ministers were flown to Moscow to plead with Leonid Brezhnev to allow “communism with a human face” in

The grid we build today should be fit for the future

The focus on transmission investment, permitting and infrastructure bottlenecks in “The world’s 80mn-kilometre power grid problem” is well placed (Moral Money, FT.com, September 25). But an important part of the conversation is often overlooked, namely the technology deployed within the grid itself.

The equipment inside substations, including circuit breakers and high-voltage switchgear, is critical to the safe, reliable and resilient operations of the power system. As electricity networks evolve into increasingly interconnected “electrical superhighways” to support electrification, renewable energy and growing demand, the infrastructure decisions made today will shape grid performance and sustainability for decades.

Environmental considerations deserve greater attention. Sulphur hexafluoride, long used in grid equipment to insulate and protect against faults, is the world's most potent greenhouse gas, with a global warming potential 23,500 times higher than carbon dioxide. Yet viable sulphur hexafluoride-free alternatives are already available, offering the reliability, scalability and compact footprint required for modern transmission networks without the environmental risk.

As investment in grid infrastructure accelerates, decisions should consider not only cost, safety and reliability, but also the long-term environmental impact of the product lifecycle. The challenge is not simply building more grid infrastructure, but ensuring the grid we build today is fit for a sustainable future. Markus Heimbach CEO, Business Unit High Voltage Products, Hitachi Energy, Zurich, Switzerland

Pensions triple lock and intergenerational fairness

It may well be time to scrap the triple lock (Opinion, September 12), but the piece didn't acknowledge how young people's expectation/entitlement has changed. They now expect to be homeowners straight away, often as a single person, often with one or more children. At the same time they expect to have mobile phones, foreign holidays, a newish car, gym membership and Netflix, etc. We didn't have those things. We rented, and struggled in our early years, eventually becoming homeowners. Our triple locked-state pensions, any increase in our property value and our savings are now indefinitely paying £1,800 a week care home fees for my husband. Beverley Adams Cambridge, UK

Email: letters.editor@ft.com

Include daytime telephone number and full address Corrections: corrections@ft.com

Czechoslovakia. Dubček enjoyed massive support from the west for his liberal reforms, yet he capitulated and the Russian tanks rolled into Prague to crush the “Prague Spring”. The west showed restraint in 1968, so Brezhnev walked all over Czechoslovakia. By contrast, John F Kennedy did not back down in the “Cuban crisis” in 1962 and Nikita Khrushchev withdrew his missiles. Sometimes controlled escalation works if there is the political will to act decisively. Marek Svoboda Frankfurt, Germany

One Anthropic 'risk factor' that is totally redundant

You report Anthropic is including as a risk factor in its IPO prospectus the elimination of humanity (Report, September 30).

If such a risk were to materialise, then there would be no claimant, no defendant and no lawyers to act for anyone who wanted to sue Anthropic for not warning them.

Given that the main purpose of such risk factors is to offer protection against subsequent litigation, this one seems a total waste of time.

I wonder how much Anthropic paid its lawyers to draft such a redundant provision. Simon Samuel

Simon Samuels Radlett, Hertfordshire, UK

Spare a thought for clubs 'cheated' by Man City saga

Manchester City's financial behaviour reflects the worst excesses of corporate governance in Premier League Football (“Manchester City found guilty of breaching Premier League rules”, Report, FT Weekend, September 26).

It is essential that any punishment is not reduced to placate the club's owner, Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The charges are serious and how other clubs were affected is also important.

One example is Stoke City, whose then manager Tony Pulis saw the Staffordshire team lose 1-0 to Manchester City in the 2011 FA Cup final. In a recent BBC article Pulis said he did not expect to get any winners medals but still feels “cheated”.

This feeling of City being dishonest will be used vigorously by opposing fans to annoy City supporters and will contaminate the atmosphere in various grounds.

It should be stated that Chelsea was under investigation, settling in the summer, and on a far lower scale Everton and Nottingham Forest suffered points deductions for wrongdoings. Whatever punishment is meted out, Manchester City has poisoned the beautiful game. David Rimmer Hertford Heath, Hertfordshire, UK

Kicking the tyres on your tribology piece

I fear Anjana Ahuja's enthusiasm for tribology – the science and technology of how surfaces move against each other, creating friction and wear – got a little out of hand when she implied that “... overcoming the friction between the tyre and road surface . . .” is desirable. In fact of course some friction is a necessity, and in itself consumes little fuel (“How tribology makes the economic world go round”, Opinion, October 7). Nick Collings Cambridge, UK

Opinion

Some much-needed American optimism on Europe

E

ven casual observers of equity markets will have noticed how cheap European stocks look compared to American ones: in aggregate, they trade at a discount of over a quarter, relative to profits. But stock pickers seeking bargains on the continent soon make an unpleasant discovery. There are far fewer large European companies to choose from, and their discounts almost always reflect slower growth than American peers. The Europe discount exists primarily because European companies struggle to expand.

Ask European investors, executives and entrepreneurs why this is — and if it can change — and they are pessimistic. Whether it's over-regulation, a patchwork of languages and traditions, or attitudes towards risk and work, the answer is that problems have existed for decades and nothing will change now. As an American, looking in from the outside, I take a different view: many of the barriers to growth are surmountable, and there are signs of progress.

Europe's scaling problem can be broken down to three C's: canons, culture and capital. Europe's canons — its laws and regulations — are the most discussed problem, amply described in the competitiveness and market reform reports from Mario Draghi and Enrico Letta. Most harmful is the costly replication of national systems for data, public procurement, tax and more.

Culturally, there are forms of European heterogeneity — language, customs, tastes — that can make it hard for some industries to scale across the continent, and which are not going away (and who would want a homogeneous Europe?). But culture also takes less benign forms: behaviours that, while not encoded in law, protect the anti-growth status quo.

Letta notes that Europeans who live and work across national borders find they need local bank accounts and phone numbers in each country to pay rent and set up utility accounts. There is no law that enforces this sort of thing, but it is ubiquitous, and it protects local incumbents against transnational innovators and consolidators. For an individual, this is a nuisance. For a small, growing company that must pay, house, move and connect employees across

EU corporate growth issues stand out in that there are solutions that don't involve awful trade-offs

Europe, it is an anchor that prevents them from going anywhere.

A recent paper finds that the valuation and size gap between US and European businesses cannot be explained by a few very large American companies; nor European businesses listing in the US; nor by the sectoral composition of the two markets. Instead, it is “the gap is concentrated precisely where a firm’s value rests not on today's cash flows but on the option to grow." The fragmentation of European markets matters: sales growth and the size of a group's local market are closely linked — a pattern absent in US companies. And there is a huge gap in the amount of "patient, risk-tolerant capital for young, high-growth firms", a problem the authors attribute in part to the fact that EU pension schemes do not create large pools of investable capital.

But do European companies struggle to scale because they lack capital, or is less capital invested because they struggle to scale? Both are probably at work; I think investors are looking, but not finding. A history of lower investment means support systems for entrepreneurs are under-developed, expectations are low and the political constituency for pro-growth reform is weak.

But this doesn't make change impossible. Corporate Europe's growth problem stands out among geopolitical issues in that there are solutions that don't involve awful trade-offs. The proposal for a supranational regulatory domicile for businesses within the common market – the “28th regime” – could bring the benefits of regulatory uniformity. Stifling business behaviours that suppress competition can be rooted out. Europe has five major stock exchanges and a litter of smaller ones. Consolidation, which has been blocked by the EU in the past, could reduce this to one or two, creating deeper pools of liquidity. EU companies are more than capable of growing fast when the conditions are right, as Aldi and ASML’s global scale shows.

The consensus is that meaningful change is politically impossible, given the entrenched local interests and hyper-cautious European bureaucracies. Don't be so sure. In Germany, plans to move away from pay-as-you-go pensions towards a public investment model are under way. The planned takeover of Commerzbank by UniCredit could open a path for the creation of European champion banks. Both changes would have been hard to imagine just a few years ago. Typical American naivety? Absolutely. But maybe a little naivety is just what Europe needs.

robert.armstrong@ft.com

Badenoch's plan to reunite the right

POLITICS Robert Shrimsley

ough on Reform. Tough on the causes of Reform. After two years of self-doubt, of fighting for survival, of the drumbeat of demands for a deal with Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Kemi Badenoch’s Conservative Party has come up with its own strategy to do so. Take Reform on and clobber it.

Just articulating the idea immediately points to the scale of the challenge. For all its issues and scandals, Reform still leads the Conservatives in most polls. It is winning council seats across the country while the Tory activist base is being hollowed out. Farage's party may be in what he admits is a trough but it is not about to disappear.

But what Badenoch's conference speech, policy announcements and other recent attacks on her rightwing challenger show is that after a year of timorous efforts to out-Farage Farage, she has taken both the strategic decision to turn her fire on Reform and the emotional step of believing it can work.

It will take a lot more than one speech to a conference few were watching. But recent months have seen Badenoch growing in confidence in her attacks on Reform. In her visible contempt for its leaders she shows there can be no accommodation with their rule-breaking instincts and toxic grievance culture. This instinct also offers Tory strategists a possible path towards their central challenge of winning back lost voters on both left and right.

For while Badenoch has gained confidence and popularity, the Tories have not. This gap was glaringly obvious at the conference. Badenoch was like a human lightbulb. But the energy she brought to a room faded as soon as she left.

The muted conference had an unreal air of optimism. “Economic reality is coming for Andy Burnham,” said one shadow minister. “Reform is busted,” said a financial backer. Tax and the economy would pull back the self-interested Lib Dem voters, said a strategist.

Maybe so, but as Badenoch says about Burnham, “hope is not a strategy”. Even if Reform support fell back to the level at the last election, that 14 per cent is more than enough to split the vote on the right and give the election to Labour. Burnham is a visibly superior political operator to Starmer. And Labour will use fear of Reform to depress the Tory vote, talking up the prospects of a deal that could put Farage into office.

After this week, Badenoch's strategy is clear. First, on the causes of Reform. She draws a distinction between the scandal-hit, financially questionable leadership and its voters. By siding with those who want far stricter immigration controls, repatriation of criminals and unauthorised migrants, more vigorous policing and a huge expansion of prison places, Badenoch's Tories have an offer for those drawn to Reform.

Next, the economy. Burnham's drift left has opened a political space. Badenoch pledges a growth agenda built around lower taxes, spending cuts and deregulation. There are still gaps, not least excluding the possibility of closer ties with the EU. Her commitment to savings is undermined by opposing Burnham's plan to reshape the triple lock for pensioners. But the broad bet is that as voters tire of a sluggish economy and higher taxes they will grant the Tories another look. Meanwhile, her headline policies like scrapping inheritance tax on family homes show her aiming squarely at more affluent voters.

Were this the entire platform, it would fall short. Values and identities still mat-

After a year of efforts to out-Farage Farage, she has taken the strategic decision to turn her fire on Reform ter too much. But by attacking Farage's party in terms that rule out any alliance this week, she placed the Tories among the anti-Reform camp. Her gutsy, sincere and correct denunciation of those who question the Englishness of non-whites — her mixed-race children included — sent lost moderates the reassuring signal they need. This means she must now do better at policing the tone of Reform-adjacent frontbenchers.

Finally, if those reclaimed liberal-minded Tories help her get ahead of Reform, she can win back the transactional voters who switched to Farage as Labour's main electoral opponent. Crucially, Badenoch has seen the road back lies first in reclaiming the centre right.

Well that's the theory. There are a lot of ifs in there. There may be a “Keminaissance” at Westminster but the party remains deeply distrusted. It is not clear voters are ready to listen. It would be an achievement just to secure clear primacy on the right. Even if Reform support plummets, Farage is a fierce fighter and has a hard core of support which may now be entrenched. Lost Remainers may demand more than not being Farage — Badenoch's own uncompromising instincts may push them away. Meanwhile, she is relying on the economy to defeat Burnham.

But the Tories can only challenge Labour if they first see off Reform: Badenoch's speech shows she accepts that reality. She is now secure enough to follow through. Farage's failure to broaden his appeal, retreating to his hardline base, has gifted the opportunity. If the right cannot be united by alliance and Reform's leader has hit the limits of his appeal, the only way left to rebuild the bloc is under the Tories. The odds are against her and such tactics have failed elsewhere but under our electoral system she can fall back on one other argument – that Reform cannot win.

So far this is just a speech and a plan. But for the first time since its defeat in 2024, her party has found two things it lacked: a plausible strategy and the backbone to fight Farage. As she might say, it's the right direction.

robert.shrimsley@ft.com

Britain cannot afford to waste its DeepMind dividend

izarrely, one of the most energising things happening in Britain right now was barely mentioned during party conference season. Nor is it much

discussed by institutional investors. Despite the ambient indifference of Westminster and the City, Britain has built the world's third-strongest innovation economy over the past 15 years. And now a new generation of entrepreneurs is busily launching scores of ambitious AI-enabled start-ups.

The latest ranking, published last week by Sifted, the FT-backed media group that I co-founded, shows that 32 per cent of the 250 fastest-growing, early-stage start-ups across Europe are from the UK. They follow previous cohorts of venture capital-backed British companies that are growing robustly. Silicon Valley is not the only place to play the VC game. On some measures, the pooled returns of British VC firms, investing between 2020 and 2024, outstrip those generated over the same period by their US peers, according to the British Business Bank.

Given how fast technology is evolving, the next 12 to 18 months may be critical for determining whether these British start-ups flourish or fade. The hope is that some can seize the moment, diffuse the benefits of AI across different industries, revitalise the British economy and emerge as global players. Fast-growing London AI start-ups, such as Wayve, ElevenLabs, Synthesia, CuspAI and PhysicsX, are already promising to transform industries as varied as autonomous driving, audio and video generation, material science and engineering.

But the risk is that another wave of the country's most ambitious entrepreneurs will decamp to the US. Faced with rising taxes and energy costs at home, they may prefer to join the west coast's AI-driven gold rush.

Much of the credit for turning London into a global AI hotspot goes to Sir Demis Hassabis, the Nobel Prize-winning co-founder of Google DeepMind. Founded in 2010, DeepMind rapidly became the leading AI research company, attracting talent from around the world.

Massive injections of capital, computing power and data, following the company's acquisition by Google in 2014, enabled DeepMind to pioneer some of the machine learning techniques pow-

Faced with rising taxes and energy costs at home, entrepreneurs may join the US west coast gold rush

ering the latest AI surge. But Google is increasingly shifting its AI focus back to California, triggering a series of departures from DeepMind in London.

What happens to these alumni may be one of the most important strategic issues facing the country. Zeki, which tracks AI researchers, has found that DeepMind remains a big talent magnet in Europe. But more researchers have left to join rivals Anthropic and OpenAI than the other way around.

Hassabis, who remains chair of Google DeepMind, is also chief executive of its London-based spinout Isomorphic Labs, which has raised \$600mn to accelerate drug discovery. Several other former DeepMind researchers have launched labs.

Most notably, David Silver has founded Ineffable Intelligence, which has raised a record \$1bn seed round to explore ways of reaching “superintelligence”. DeepMind’s former principal scientist Tim Rocktäschel has co-founded Recursive Superintelligence, raising more than \$500mn. DeepMind alumni are also behind three other ventures: Emulate, Revolution Labs and Metis Reasoning.

"I think this is a great moment for London. There is a lot of very interesting . . . activity across a wide spectrum of ideas," says one former DeepMind researcher working on a new start-up. "The DeepMind dividend is incredible."

Some of these start-up founders com- plain that non-compete clauses make it harder for them to hire from big US tech companies. But the government is working “extremely rapidly” on a solution, Kanishka Narayan, Britain’s AI minister, said last week. He has also promised the government will place more contracts with UK start-ups.

The lack of domestic growth capital is another industry bugbear. Behind the scenes, successive governments have helped improve financial support systems, says Saul Klein, chair of the investment group Phoenix Court. The British Business Bank has been expanded, local pension funds are being consolidated and 17 fund managers have pledged to increase domestic private-market investment.

But, to date, domestic capital is only trickling in. It mystifies Klein why US, Canadian, Japanese and Singaporean investors are more enthusiastic backers of Britain's young companies than the country's own institutional funds. An obvious investment opportunity lies under their own noses. It would be tragic for Britain if they fail to act.

john.thornhill@ft.com

Cyber war won't be the same in the age of AI

Ahana Datta Fasel

ast month, the Australian government revealed that AI agents had breached its healthcare systems. A fortnight earlier, Anthropic reported that Russian cyber actors were using AI to perform reconnaissance, hacking and data theft more efficiently. These and dozens of other cyber attacks are not yet fully autonomous, but they are beginning to show the cost of delegating control to machines.

For human defenders, autonomous cyber attacks are a perfect storm, clouding an attacker's intent and complicating the task of holding a human "hand on the keyboard" accountable. But using AI also creates uncertainty for the attacker. The AI will adapt its behaviour based on what it encounters — networks, defences and opportunities — deciding for itself how to pursue a human-provided objective. This behaviour may not always be predictable, and soon may not always be controllable.

Moscow has a tradition of exploiting uncertainty. In 1918, Russian military thinkers incorporated surveillance evasion lessons from the first world war into the broader concept of maskirovka. Deception creates uncertainty in an adversary's mind about intent and capabilities, delaying, confusing and constraining its response. A century later, this strategy often appears in Russian-linked cyber operations.

Historically, deception was an adversarial act: one side deliberately created uncertainty for the other. But autonomous systems introduce uncertainty in both directions – and not necessarily

An attacker has to weigh the risks of losing control over how a defender might interpret its behaviour

intentionally. A defender must account for the future behaviour of an autonomous system; an attacker has to weigh the risks of losing control over how a defender might interpret its behaviour.

Maskirovka sought to weaponise uncertainty to exploit a basic logic of deterrence: an adversary is less likely to act when it believes the cost of doing so will outweigh the gains. That is no longer a clean calculation. Today, uncertainty can change the willingness to act on both sides. For the attacker, the loss of control has become part of the calculation. A misinterpretation can make escalation harder to contain.

What sort of state (or AI lab) might wish to take that risk? An actor seeking a tightly controlled outcome may not want to offload consequential decisions. But one that values adaptive and persistent access to networks may be willing to accept uncertainty, despite the risk of unintended consequences. Likewise, one with its back to the wall may seek to create room to manoeuvre.

Criminal and state-backed actors are now showing a willingness to trade control for capability, whether for espionage or ransomware. The more autonomy is delegated to AI systems, the harder it may become for defenders to distinguish a machine's unintended action from escalation and for attackers to control the consequences. Deterrence today must target this trade-off.

Imagine a scenario like the recent cyber attacks on the French defence industry or Polish power grid, but where the operator sets an objective instead of dictating every step. In one network, the AI steals credentials and collects information. In another, it finds a connected system and probes it to help preserve access. A defender watching the second operation cannot see the original instruction, only hostile actors moving deeper into its network. The defender must decide: is this espionage, preparation for sabotage or something else? What is the appropriate response?

The value of deception lies not in hiding the truth indefinitely, but in doing so long enough to compress a defender's decision-making window. Introducing autonomous systems into the mix changes the old bargain. The deceiver can no longer be certain that the ambiguity it creates will remain on the other side. In a crisis, that could leave both sides scrambling to respond to an action whose meaning neither can discern.

The writer is the author of Full Stack Spies: Cyber Espionage in the Age of US — China Competition

Energy crisis is changing what investors want from oil majors

An oil refinery in southern France — Miguel Medina/AFP/Getty Images

he immense dislocations wrought on markets by war in Iran have created opportunities for energy companies. Some are

faring better than others. With transit through the Strait of Hormuz still highly unreliable, three qualities are now proving particularly valuable — and they play to the strengths of Europe's unloved oil majors.

First and foremost is refining capacity. Not all oil drillers also turn the raw product into specialist commodities like jet fuel and diesel. Those that are big in both activities were, for a long time, out of fashion. It wasn't easy for them to compete with bigger, newer and cheaper refineries in the Middle East and Asia.

But disruption in the Gulf has severely dented the availability of those refined fuels: supply has halved since before the war, according to data from analytics platform Kpler. That means refined products trade at much higher prices than their main ingredient, and the resulting spread is a windfall for those that can handle the transformation themselves.

ExxonMobil is one of those that is still big on refining, processing almost as many barrels of crude as it produces. But beyond this outlier, European majors are better placed. Shell and BP have sizeable refining businesses and Spain's Repsol refines over 80 per cent more barrels than it produces.

The second great-to-have is a trading business. The Iran crisis has snarled up usually free-flowing energy markets: oil and gas trade have seen vastly different prices

depending on where and when they are bought. That's an opportunity for companies that have a global portfolio of fields, pipelines, storage terminals and refineries, fleets of ships, and a well-thumbed Rolodex of commercial contacts.

These, again, tend to be in Europe. At Shell, BP and TotalEnergies, trading accounted for 15-20 per cent of 2025 earnings in aggregate, according to

If war and energy turmoil were fleeting, then Europe's advantages might be too

Goldman Sachs. In the US, meanwhile, even the largest and best organised companies prefer to sell as close to the wellhead, or refinery gate, as possible. Oil isn't the only industry in which transatlantic differences in habit and culture have created unexpected winners and losers: European airlines' propensity to hedge fuel prices, unlike their US counterparties, has also turned out to be in tune with the

zeitgeist. Finally, it's good to be close to where the supply-demand balance is most out of whack. European spot gas prices have risen far beyond those in the US, and unsurprisingly, European majors tend to be more exposed to that market. Norway's Equinor reckons that in the third quarter its fields will sell gas at a price roughly 50 per cent higher than in the first three months of the year.

If war and energy turmoil were fleeting, then Europe's advantages might be too. The American majors have better growth prospects and a more supportive investor base. But the conflict in Iran is starting to seem endless, and even if it is resolved it will leave the world a more fractured place.

That may only gradually be dawning on equity investors. Europe's oil companies still trade at a discount to their US peers, even though it has narrowed during the Iran crisis. In normal times when the free flow of oil seemed unassailable, it was perfectly rational to prize the US firms more highly; normal times are probably not coming back.

Bank stocks are falling despite surging interest rates

Rising interest rates can be either good or bad for banks. More often than not, their effect is positive.

A recent fall in bank shares, though, even as bond yields hit multi-decade highs, reflects concerns that unusual forces are at work. Lenders like higher rates because what they charge borrowers tends to rise in tandem with market benchmarks, whereas only a fraction of that increase is passed on to savers. Yet despite a recent jump in rates, the Stoxx sub-index of large European lenders has fallen 7 per cent since the start of September, almost twice as far as the broader market. On the loans side, one risk is that prices get so high that demand starts to wane – like any other product. The average interest rate on a five-year fixed-rate mortgage in the UK recently passed 6 per cent, not great for banks hoping to expand loan growth.

The type of interest rate move matters too. Lately, short-term bonds have moved further than long-term ones. Since a bank's business model is to borrow short and lend long, this dynamic hurts profitability. Meanwhile if funding costs rise, the expanding profit margins banks have enjoyed may start to reverse. Competition for deposits is higher than it was in olden times, thanks to ambitious fintechs offering generous yields on savings.

Fiercer jockeying for savers' money would be likely to push up banks' "deposit betas" – how much of a given central bank rate rise they must pass through to their depositors. Expect bank chiefs to be grilled on that ratio when they report third-quarter earnings: US lenders are set to do so next week, Europeans the week after.

Not everyone is concerned. Analysts at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods reckon deposit and loan costs in Europe are rising together, limiting margin pressure. And Deutsche Bank's chief financial officer Raja Akram told a recent conference that rate moves should lead to higher income. Nor are all the unusual forces negative. Some demand in Europe is being driven by long-term trends such as investment in defence and infrastructure, which should be durable even at higher

prices. The growth in loans to Eurozone companies was above 4 per cent in both July and August, higher than it has been in three years.

The recent sell-off means expectations are at least set relatively low. The Stoxx banks sub-index trades at a more modest forward price-to-earnings multiple than it did at the start of the year, and if banks prove bullish, it would look cheaper still. Europe's banks have outperformed the market for five years in a row; they still have a good shot of making it six.

Boots buyout proves old age can be an asset on the UK high street

By all rights, Boots should no longer exist. The UK retailer is 177 years old, and has spent decades fighting to keep its footing on a high street where waves of challengers and technological threats have killed off countless other retailers. Yet this week the UK chain was bought by Canada's Weston family for a respectable \$8.9bn, suggesting it has a reasonable future ahead of it.

One thing that sets it apart from other retailers is its pharmacy licence, and its ability to get customers who come in for prescriptions to buy other things too.

True, this cross-selling has taken various forms: in the 1980s, Boots stretched into other kinds of retail, buying the parent of bike and car parts maker Halfords. At one point it was selling everything from video cameras to toasters. Supermarkets eventually muscled in on that, but Boots was saved by a pivot to beauty products. By the mid nineties, non-prescription sales were about 85 per cent of revenue, according to archived annual reports.

Boots is now more reliant on its health division than it was. And beauty and wellness are a growing trend. Its next opportunity may lie in offering more services, as well as products, such as makeovers and health checks.

For retailers, old age actually appears to confer some advantages — such as a sense of affection from customers. It's rare to find companies as venerable as Boots: fewer than 1 per cent of the active businesses registered with Companies House are over a century old, but a disproportionate share of them are in consumer businesses like retail, leisure and hospitality. Other centenarians include Twinings Tea and fashion brands Barbour and Burberry.

This is analogous to the so-called Lindy effect, named after a New York delicatessen, which theorises that the longer something has existed, the longer it might survive. But there are examples to the contrary too. Department store Debenhams survived the Napoleonic wars, but was doomed by private equity ownership that stripped away assets and left it saddled with onerous lease liabilities. It closed its UK stores in 2021.

That points to the third reason for optimism: the Westons, who say they want to improve Boots “for generations to come”, can take a long-term view on the business without the pressures of private investors or public markets. Having come this far, perhaps Boots will see in its third century too.

Shelf life

Company age as a share of the Companies House effective register (%)

The 'effective' register excludes companies that are in the process of liquidation or dissolution Source: Companies House

NIKKEI Asia The voice of the Asian century
CROSSWORD No 18,501 by SLEUTH

JOTTER PAD
Solution 18,500

Scan the QR code to access FT crosswords over the last 30 days — cryptic, Polymath, Weekend and Sunday puzzles — or go to ft.com/crosswordapp

ACROSS

1 Fantastic Lakeland after leaving large area somewhere in Cumbria (6)
4 A special thing that might be tapped around house plant (8)
9 Mess left exposed in coastguard's vessel (6)
10 Excellent supply in food for parties on the counter (8)
12 Favour singer Pat on the radio (4)
13 Restriction found in slim item (5)
14 On and off, Celt uses hint (4)
17 A companion with role that is dividing island groups on tour? (5,7)
20 Tenor with a few seconds broadcast showing insincerity (3-9)
23 Chinese leader is among French and making departure (4)
24 Severe sign of austerity in site with many patients? (5)
25 Dog in part of Liverpool lacking sun (4)
28 Not directly useful description of some research? (8)
29 This person's upset about a rule in African country (6)
30 Temporary set of cars in capital of Guyana (8)
31 Soldiers have treatment for harrowing experience (6)

DOWN

1 Thrill over support for illegal payment (8)
2 Supposed citizen having love for Austria (8)
3 Ambassador interrupting middle of game? It's said to gain attention (4)
5 Second work? Cite this possibly when entertaining a refined type (12)
6 Pay attention to the educational hosts (4)
7 Daughter has saunter with time gone and walk in the park? (6)
8 See director, say, turning up with right person for a short stay? (6)
11 Inspector stuck with a pair of fellows in part has resentment (12)
15 Gaudy poster not seen in dark? (5)
16 They are first picked up in English city (5)
18 Put down tips for leisure in Surrey town writer disowned (8)
19 Particular European institute found in varied places (8)
21 What cuts weight when promoted creates interest (6)
22 Pressure on mad rogue operator (6)
26 Touched soft material (4)
27 Announce cut for item (4)

FINANCIAL TIMES

Another 20 case studies to set Lord Leverhulme's mind at ease

"Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted and the trouble is I don't know which half." Unlike His Lordship, today's brand owners needn't fret.

Twenty case studies from this year's IPA Effectiveness Awards are just the latest irrefutable evidence. Advertising budgets, when they are spent properly are never wasted. Scan the QR code to find out how you should spend yours.

Photo: Bryn Lennon/Getty Images

FT SCOREBOARD

Friday October 9 2026

The Business of

Formula 1

Inside Bottas: from the podium to the back of the grid, Page 3 ▶ Red Bull rues building best engine at first attempt, Page 2

www.ft.com/f1

Iran war boosts case for new Asian race venue

F1 chief warns existing host circuit could lose out to rival bids, by Rebecca Clancy

formula 1 is weighing competing bids from several Asian countries for an additional race in the region. The sport's unexpected return to Malaysia last weekend because of the Iran war underlined the strength of demand in the region. But any new venue would have to replace one of the existing host circuits, according to Stefano Domenicali, F1's chief executive, who says there are no plans to expand beyond the current 24-race season.

Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and South Korea are among the countries interested in securing a place in the calendar. The return in 2027 of the Turkish Grand Prix – on the Asian side of Istanbul – means Asia will host nine races next season, overtaking Europe with eight for the first time.

"The interest in that region is very strong," says Domenicali, speaking to the Financial Times ahead of this weekend's Singapore Grand Prix. The 61-year-old Italian adds that his team is assessing which proposal would offer the strongest long-term proposition.

Competition to become a host has intensified after Malaysia's surprise return to the F1 calendar this season. Its Sepang circuit, which last held a race in 2017, was drafted in to host last weekend's delayed Bahrain Grand Prix. The war in the Middle East led to the cancellation of the original race in April, along with the Saudi Arabian GP a week later.

Domenicali says tickets for the hastily arranged Malaysian race sold out in just three weeks, demonstrating the popularity of the sport in the region. “It was amazing,” he says. “To think that the last time we were in Malaysia was 2017 and we were able to sell out the tickets in such a short time means that the interest in that region is very, very strong.”

The rapid take-up could help put

Tickets for the hastily arranged Bahrain GP in Malaysia sold out in just three weeks, says Domenicali

Malaysia in contention for a permanent return to the championship. “I’m pretty convinced that the Malaysians by themselves will try to be around our table to discuss eventual future possibilities,” Domenicali says, while stressing that he has received no guarantee that such talks will take place.

Moreover, Malaysia would face fierce competition. Thailand has stepped up efforts to become a host nation in recent years, while Vietnam and South Korea have also maintained a strong interest. Vietnam was set to host a race in 2020 but it was cancelled due to Covid and the £540mn circuit was subsequently abandoned. F1 has previously considered the possibility of adding a second race in China but has since rejected it.

Domenicali says the assessment of any future host would look at “what is the most structured and long-term” proposition, with infrastructure, fan interest, promoters’ business plans and opportunities for commercial partners among the criteria.

The disruption caused by the Iran war has also added another consideration Continued on page 3

Mid-race refuelling debate fires up paddock

The controversial practice — introduced in 1994 and banned on safety grounds at the end of the 2009 season — has resurfaced as F1 considers an overhaul of car design regulations for 2031.

The reset aims to cut costs and reduce car weight to improve handling, alongside a planned return to a simpler engine design. Page 2

The Business of Formula 1

Regulation After four years in development, the team debuted its in-house power unit but success comes with its downsides, writes Jonathan Noble

Red Bull rues building best engine at first attempt

nder any other Formula 1 rules regime, having the best engine should be cause for celebration. But Red Bull's achievement, in its

first campaign manufacturing its own power units, has proved to be a mixed blessing.

After four years designing and building the engine, expectations were low at Red Bull ahead of the start of the season as it transitioned to a full-works team. Nevertheless, it has enjoyed some success on the track with a first victory at the Bahrain Grand Prix in Malaysia last weekend and a further nine podium finishes so far.

Yet instead of being able to continue to improve the engine's performance, the team's hands have been tied by new rules introduced at the start of this season as part of a comprehensive overhaul of engine regulations.

Under a complicated “catch-up” mechanism governing power unit development that came into force this year, the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA), F1’s governing body, deemed Red Bull had beaten more established rivals and produced the best engine at its first attempt.

The mechanism, known as Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities (Aduo), was introduced as a safety net for any manufacturer to correct mistakes made during the comprehensive redesign of power units that was required by the engine rule changes for the 2026 season.

Red Bull, in partnership with US car-maker Ford, is now the fifth of the 11 teams on the grid to build both car and engine. But the new mechanism means that while its rivals can continue to improve their engines during this season and next, Red Bull cannot.

This has left the Austrian team, which lobbied heavily for some elements of the new engine regulations in the first place, frustrated with the strictures imposed by the FIA and its methodology.

“We had conflicting thoughts [about FIA's findings]. It was surprising and contrasted with our data analysis, and it [has] had very significant consequences on the next couple of years of the development of the project,” says Laurent Mekies, Red Bull team principal.

Central to the controversy is that the rankings are based on just one element of the overall power unit: the internal combustion engine. They ignore other key components that are just as important for lap time, like battery power and efficiency. The FIA has repeatedly pushed back during the season, insisting the data used in the Aduo rankings was of “high quality” and its measurements were therefore “accurate.”

But Red Bull is not alone in raising questions about the methodology. Mercedes has spoken openly about having the best overall power unit and results so far suggest the championship leader's assessment is correct.

The new rules mean Mercedes is allowed to deliver one in-season upgrade this year and one next season, while the remaining three engine makers – Ferrari, Honda and Audi, the other new power unit manufacturer this year – have two windows this season and next. Furthermore, all four rivals to Red Bull are allowed more factory testing and extra spending allowances.

Aduo is just one of a series of controversies thrown up by FIA's decision to require a total redesign of engines this season. Others include a compression ratio dispute involving Mercedes, mid-season changes to stop excessive energy management, and new rules to shift

Max Verstappen (left) secured Red Bull's first victory of the season in Malaysia, giving team principal Laurent Mekies (right) something to smile about Jakub Porzycki, Sona Maletterova/Getty Images

away over the next two years from the 50/50 split between internal combustion engine and battery power – a goal that was central to the new regulations.

Ultimately, Red Bull is a victim of its own success. A first win of the season in Malaysia as well as four second and five third-place finishes in 16 races are viewed internally as proof that its power unit project is exceeding expectations.

Former Red Bull principal Christian Horner says this is due to the mindset that pervades the team that has done so much to shake up the establishment since it entered the sport in 2005. It took just 55 weeks to have its UK-based engine factory up and running in Milton Keynes once Horner had sold the vision of becoming a fully integrated works team to the board of its eponymous owner, the Austrian energy drink maker, in 2021.

"All I did was apply the same philosophy to the engine as I did with the chassis," says Horner. "We assembled a great group of people, and some of them were a bit quirky, but we got them to work together and believe."

Mekies credits the “risk-taking approach” needed in the first place to

Red Bull designed its engine factory around the new rules while rivals reworked existing ones

sign off a project that he says would have been “refused by every other board in the world”.

Red Bull's aggressive recruitment programme included poaching key staff from rival Mercedes, such as technical director Ben Hodgkinson and engineering director Phil Prew.

Other factors helped too. The first, a result in part due to heavy lobbying of the FIA by Red Bull, was the inclusion of a cost cap for engine development in the new 2026 regulations.

Under the previous set of rules, engine budgets were exceeding \$500mn per year for some manufacturers – something that Red Bull would have been unable to match. The new cap limits spending to \$190mn annually.

By starting from scratch, Red Bull was able to design its engine factory around the new regulations while its rivals had to rework existing facilities and procedures. The clean-sheet approach allowed it to design subcomponent test rigs around an office hub, purchasing the latest state of the art machinery to simulate full operating temperatures.

The other factor, says Hodgkinson, was the array of talent attracted to Red Bull as the first F1 team since Toyota in the early 2000s to start an engine manufacturing project from scratch.

It pulled in engineers prepared to take on establishment thinking, with diverse views, which he believes was critical in fuelling creativity and innovation – a process he describes as an “organic filter”.

Red Bull's decision to build its own engine was a huge gamble. If it had failed, the consequences could have been severe and, in the worst-case scenario, led to the departure of star driver and four-time world champion Max Verstappen.

Mekies says that the fear of failure has gone and insists “confidence is there” in the project. For Red Bull, the challenge now is not about the job it has done, but in dealing with the downside of having done it too well. This means looking for small gains into next season in the limited areas where development is allowed.

"We will have less scope than the competition, so we just need to try to make better use of the more limited scope that we have."

Could mid-race refuelling make a comeback?

The defining image of the sport's previous refuelling era: the fire that engulfed the car driven by Jos Verstappen at the 1994 German GP Alamy

Perhaps the most damning argument against refuelling made by those in the sport is the impact it had on the racing

The controversial idea has resurfaced under plans to overhaul car design by 2031, writes Jonathan Noble

Formula 1's latest, all-new rules era may have only just started this season, but attention is already shifting to the major reset that is going to replace it.

After more than a decade during which cars have become heavier, the target is to reduce their weight by 2031 to improve the handling for drivers and consequently give the fans a better racing experience.

The next reset is also intended to reduce the cost of building the cars, including plans to replace the current turbo-hybrid power unit with a return to a simpler V8 engine design.

F1's chiefs are looking at ways of cutting the weight of the cars from just under 770kg to below 700kg, reversing a near-continuous increase in weight over the last 25 years and back to a level last seen prior to 2015.

There is conflict, though, between the desire for lighter cars and a planned move to less efficient V8 engines that require more fuel to cover a full race.

Regulators are trying to balance the weight reduction target with the fact that teams would have to add extra load with more fuel, which is why the controversial idea of refuelling during pit stops has resurfaced. The practice, first introduced in 1994, was banned due to safety concerns at the end of the 2009 season.

Fan surveys over the years have demonstrated their support for a return to refuelling, while some drivers talk nostalgically about the on-the-edge racing that was a hallmark of the days when pit crews were topping up the tanks.

"I would love to be in an era of F1 where we saw races in the past with refuelling, with light cars, good tyres, where it's always pushing flat out," Aston Martin driver Lance Stroll said

earlier this year when asked what was missing from the sport today.

But there is little support for it in the paddock, with senior executives at many of the F1 teams resistant to the return of refuelling.

Privately, most of them recoil in horror at the prospect, with many pointing to the defining image of the sport's previous refuelling era: the inferno at the 1994 German Grand Prix that engulfed the car driven by Jos Verstappen, father of four-time champion Max, in the pits.

There is a financial aspect too. F1 paddock sources suggest that equipment costs, plus shipping the fuel and the related equipment around the world, could add as much as \$5mn per year to a team's budget. Under F1's cost cap, that is an outlay many teams would rather not have to make.

But perhaps the most damning argument against refuelling made by those in the sport is the impact it had on the racing, with little evidence that it adds anything to the spectacle despite fans' nostalgia for its return.

Racing Bulls' CEO Peter Bayer, who held a senior position at the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), F1's governing body, from 2017 to 2022, says that regular analysis over the years threw up few positives.

"I remember when I was still working with the FIA, we had a working group with Formula 1, with [former managing director] Ross Brawn, about how to improve the entertainment, the spectacle," he

explained when asked about the topic at the Dutch GP in late August.

"One of the big ideas of some people was refuelling, and we were digging very deep into historic footage and data that we had.

"It showed that other than a couple of very spectacular and dangerous images, refuelling has not done really anything for the sport because most of the overtaking suddenly took place in the pit lane."

Williams team boss James Vowles, who was head of strategy at the championship-winning Brawn GP team in 2009 when refuelling was last allowed, agrees.

Speaking at the same event as Bayer, he said the flat-out racing that epitomised the refuelling era

ultimately reduced variability by locking teams into stops on a predetermined lap and removing flexibility to react to outside circumstances.

Vowles added that the impact would be even worse now due to huge improvements in competitor analysis that would allow teams to work out with much greater accuracy what their rivals were up to.

"You're always going to take the car right to the end of its fuel load because that's when it's fastest, which now means you can predict what's going to happen," he said.

"Nowadays, with the exposure to the outside world, everyone will start getting that information. It actually takes quite a bit of the intrigue out of it for me."

Despite the longstanding resistance from teams, the FIA has launched a study to better understand whether a return to refuelling would be beneficial alongside the move to lighter cars.

The evaluation is ongoing. Its final conclusion will almost certainly depend on the final configuration of the V8 engine specified by the regulator.

If the V8 were normally aspirated, it would need more fuel to complete a race distance, which would strengthen the in-race refuelling argument. However, if a smaller turbo is retained to improve efficiency, then refuelling would not be necessary.

The FIA's single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis hopes F1 ends up with a regulation set where the argument for refuelling falls away. "We are generally not keen to go to refuelling," he says. "There's nothing final yet, but we don't want to completely get rid of the turbo.

"We want to retain efficient engines, and if there's more horsepower on the ICE [internal combustion engine] side, there will be a bit of an increase in consumption, but it's not gigantic.

"We feel that what we are going to save on the rest will certainly outweigh a lot of the fuel increase. The cars will maybe have about $20\mathrm{kg}$ more fuel, maybe $25\mathrm{kg}$ .

“But if they are lighter by say 80kg, the start of the race will still be much better. And of course in qualifying you don’t have that problem.”

Tombazis knows that there is a long way to go yet before the rules are finalised and the refuelling issue is resolved one way or another, but he is convinced F1's ultimate lighter car target can be hit.

“We are conscious that when we discuss things, there will be some kickback on some areas and we’ll have to compromise a bit,” he says. “There will be concerns about certain costs, but overall, our target is to be below 700kg. I think it will be a significant step to make the cars more exciting.”

It is an excitement that many in F1 hope can come without putting refuelling rigs back in the pit lane.

From the podium to the back of the grid

Interview Valtteri Bottas A move to Cadillac, F1's newest team, has made for a tough season, the Finn tells Rebecca Clancy

For Formula 1 drivers, one of the hardest realities to grapple with is going from challenging for wins to struggling to finish. Twenty-two cars line up on the grid, but only a handful of the drivers can actually expect to claim top spot. For the rest, success is measured differently, be it a podium finish, beating your teammate or just not coming last.

Few know both ends of that spectrum better than Valtteri Bottas. The 37-year-old Finn spent five seasons at Mercedes during its era of dominance, and over his career at the top, which started with Williams back in 2013, he won 10 grands prix and made the podium 67 times.

Only three of the current crop of drivers have more podium finishes. Bottas's last podium spot came in 2021, however, and this season he is driving for Cadillac, F1's newest team, which currently sits last in the constructors' table as the only team yet to score a point.

The contrast is stark. At Mercedes, Bottas arrived at races knowing he had the machinery needed for victory. At Cadillac, the objective is to build a team capable of competing with rivals that have been in the sport for decades. “I knew it was going to be a difficult year,” he told the FT ahead of the Spanish GP last month. “It was going to involve quite a bit of problem solving, making progress and trying to get up and running in every area.”

Cadillac is attempting to do almost everything simultaneously: build factories, cars, engines from 2029, and a competitive culture. Bottas says the results have broadly matched his expectations.

"We are definitely seeing an improvement somewhere every weekend," he says. "It's not necessarily in the results yet, but it's in how we operate as a team in different areas."

He is particularly enthusiastic about Cadillac's new facilities in Silverstone, which Bottas visited last month. He describes the factory as the most impressive he has encountered in F1. "I would say so," he replies when asked if it was better than Mercedes' set-up.

The greater frustration has been the reliability of his car. Bottas has failed to finish eight of this year's 16 races. A retirement costs a team twice, first in the result, then in data it failed to gather from the lost laps. Every kilometre matters when the car itself is still a work in progress.

“Once you have issues, whether it’s in practice or qualifying, that’s when you can’t improve,” he says. “You’re just trying to fix the issues instead of focusing on performance and making the car faster.”

Bottas says in terms of motivation he has made the psychological adjustments needed to drive for the newest team. "The main thing is trying to get the most out of myself and trying to be the best version of myself that I can," he explains. "It's the same with the people around me. I'm trying to make sure they are getting the most out of themselves and giving everything they have. In the end, that's all we can do."

He insists he savours the experience. “I enjoy problem-solving,” he says. “Of course, I would love to be racing in the mix and fighting for points, but I knew it was going to be hard this year.” At Mercedes, the overriding task was extracting the decisive minimal gains in performance from a mature, championship-winning operation. At Cadillac, his feedback must serve several time horizons at once.

“It’s not just thinking about this weekend,” he says, referring to the race in Madrid in mid-September. “But also about what could help us in the short and long term. It’s about looking at the bigger picture when it comes to car development.”

That experience was one reason Cadillac recruited Bottas alongside Sergio Pérez, another veteran who knows both the front and back of the grid. The pair have each experienced the peculiar demands of being teammate to a multiple world

Bottas is savouring the experience at Cadillac: 'Of course, I would love to be racing in the mix and fighting for points, but I knew it was going to be hard this year'

champion – Bottas alongside Lewis Hamilton at Mercedes and Pérez with Max Verstappen at Red Bull.

Bottas says the relationship between the two veterans is uncomplicated. “We’ve been in good teams, and we’ve also had more challenging times in the sport. We’ve both seen what works and what doesn’t . . . We know that we need to put the team first, not ourselves, at this point.”

For Cadillac, Bottas offers something beyond engineering feedback. During the latter part of his career he has acquired a cult following, revealing a more eccentric public persona than the reserved Finn who spent years in Hamilton's shadow. That recognition is valuable for a US newcomer like Cadillac

Valtteri Bottas after the qualifying rounds at the Azerbaijan GP in September. The race is one of eight so far this season that he has failed to finish Altan Gocher/AFP via Getty Images

attempting to establish its identity in a crowded global sport with multiple personalities.

Bottas has also been building an identity beyond F1. And after Sunday's Singapore GP, he will briefly exchange one for the other.

Rather than travelling immediately to the next race in Austin, he plans to take advantage of the two-week gap by flying directly from Singapore to Adelaide. From there, he will head to McLaren Vale, the South Australian wine region where he and his partner, Australian professional cyclist Tiffany Cromwell, own a vineyard and offer luxury accommodation. "It's paradise," Bottas says.

He plans to spend the week there before returning to F1. The detour offers a glimpse of a life Bottas has been building alongside his racing career and one that would keep him busy when the paddock no longer does.

"I started thinking about it a long time ago," he says. "I always knew this sport wasn't going to last for ever, and you have to be prepared for what's next."

Bottas has tended to put money into areas of personal interest. Coffee is one. He is a partner in Kahiwa Coffee Roasters in Finland; ice hockey another — he is part-owner of the Lahti Pelicans, the professional club from his home town, and sits on its board.

"I'm quite involved," he says of the hockey team. "But again, I can choose my workload, how many meetings I attend, how many games I go to and so on."

It is an eclectic portfolio, but it gives him something that F1, a sport of relentless schedules and split-second judgments, rarely provides: control over his time.

"The good thing is that everything is now set up so I can choose my workload and how involved I am in certain things," he says. "There are a lot of things I've aligned that will definitely keep me busy in the future."

There is an obvious temptation to interpret this as preparation for retirement. Bottas resists this suggestion. He says he might have prepared for a future outside F1 but, for the moment, he still wants to race.

Asked whether he could imagine eventually stepping out of the cockpit but remaining at Cadillac to help develop the team, his response is immediate.

"Never say never, but hopefully that's far away," he says. "With all the hard work I'm putting in [at Cadillac] I eventually want to see the results of it."

He only turned 37 in August and he points out that some of the big-name drivers of recent years, Fernando Alonso and Hamilton, have proved that F1 careers can extend into a driver's forties. "If I compare myself with Fernando or Lewis, I should still have some years left."

War boosts case for new Asian venue

An Iranian strike on the US navy base in Bahrain in February —Anadolu via Getty Images

Continued from page 1

for the planners of future championships: the need for flexibility to adapt the calendar when geopolitical events make racing impossible.

While the race in Bahrain was moved to Malaysia, the Saudi Arabian GP was cancelled without a replacement. The two other races in the Middle East — in Qatar and Abu Dhabi — are scheduled to conclude the season and Domenicali insists as of early October that both will go ahead, despite uncertainty about Tehran and Washington reaching a final settlement to end the war.

"Our decision is done," he says. "With the status of the situation, the calendar is confirmed" for Qatar and Abu Dhabi. Both races were already sold out, he adds. Despite that assertion, F1 has contingency arrangements in place to move the season finale in Abu Dhabi, scheduled for early December, should it be cancelled closer to the race. There is no alternative for Qatar.

“Imola is the place that eventually, in case of a force majeure before a certain date, would be ready to host it,” Domenicali explains, but insists that “the focus very clearly is Qatar and Abu Dhabi”.

The logistical requirements to prepare each circuit mean any decision to shift venues would have to happen about a month before the race was scheduled, he adds.

The war has highlighted the risks associated with the push by F1 owner Liberty Media to further globalise the sport since it bought the car-racing series in 2017. Domenicali believes the logistical complexities associated with F1 leave it more exposed to geopolitics than any other sport.

"I would say that not so many sports have . . . our complexity," he explains. "One thing is us moving thousands and thousands of people, tonnes and tonnes of materials from day to night, from one place to another."

He says the preparations for backup races this season had given his team “a solid foundation” should the need arise to find a replacement venue for a race in the future. “I would say the flexibility that we have . . . is even stronger now because [of dealing with] the requests [from potential replacement host] countries.”

The offerings from newer circuits have already forced some of the championship's traditional European races to up their game

But that should not be taken as F1 putting a formal network of reserve circuits in place, he says. The investment required in ticket sales, hotels, logistics and organisation means potential promoters cannot be expected to remain on standby until the last moment.

But he acknowledges that increased interaction with potential hosts in Asia would allow F1 “to have different options in the future in case . . . we need to revisit our strategy in the world".

F1's decision not to add to its 24-race limit per season puts more pressure on existing hosts around the world. Domenicali says the expansion of the race calendar in recent years and the offerings from the newer circuits have already forced some of the championship's traditional European races to up their game.

“Even the most historical promoters . . . are [being] pushed to improve the quality of what they are offering, because that's, for me, the most important point. I mean historical [links only have] value if you want to invest for the future, otherwise it's not enough,” he adds. “We have seen that happening with Monaco, in Monza and Silverstone. They were, in a way, pushed by the system to improve the quality of what we need to offer.”

But a new Asian host circuit on the F1 racing calendar would not necessarily come at the expense of a European circuit. Singapore's contract expires at the end of next season, Domenicali points out, while the contracts for the Japan and China GPs expire at the end of the 2029 and 2030 seasons respectively. India, which last hosted F1 in 2013, is not a short-term prospect, he adds.

The region is important to the growth of the sport, he says, while refusing to be drawn on which potential bidder has the best prospect. “Far East Asia will be one of the areas where we will develop the future of F1 . . . if we are able to penetrate this market in the right way.”

Contributors

Rebecca Clancy Freelance journalist

Jonathan Noble
Freelance journalist

Mark Odell
Commissioning editor

Steven Bird Designer

Esan Swan Picture editor

For advertising details, contact: Nikola Peros +33 (6) 2805 8404 nikola.peros@ft.com

All editorial content in this report is produced by the FT. Our advertisers have no influence over or prior sight of the articles.

More competitive grid broadens sport's appeal

Mercedes' Kimi Antonelli (centre) is top of the drivers' standings by 84 points with seven races left — Mairo Cinquetti/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Prospect of new champion works commercially for broadcasters and sponsors, writes Rebecca Clancy

F

or much of this century, Formula 1 has been defined by periods of dominance by one driver and team. Michael Schumacher and Ferrari won five consecutive drivers' champion-

ships at the start of the century, before Sebastian Vettel and Red Bull claimed four in succession a decade later. Mercedes then took control with Lewis Hamilton, before Red Bull and Max Verstappen became the sport's dominant force.

There were interruptions to those dynasties but sustained periods of supremacy have been a recurring feature of modern F1. Yet after McLaren's Lando Norris won last season, the sport is facing the prospect of a second consecutive campaign with a new world champion. Mercedes' Kimi Antonelli leads teammate George Russell by 84 points going into the Singapore Grand Prix this weekend with seven races remaining.

A more competitive grid has produced a broader cast of potential winners – six drivers have already won races this season – giving broadcasters, sponsors and the sport itself more stories to sell.

“Increased competitiveness in the last two to three seasons is certainly one contributor to F1's elevated commercial value in that period,” says Scott Branch, senior vice-president and integrated business lead at The Team, a sports and entertainment agency.

A dominant champion can be highly marketable. The success of Britain's Hamilton turned him into one of the world's most recognisable athletes. Dutchman Verstappen's run of titles created another global star.

But dominance also carries an obvious sporting risk: viewers have fewer reasons to watch if they believe they already know how the story ends. A crowded title fight offers something different. Every race can alter the championship, while each contender brings a different constituency of fans, sponsors and national interest.

“While a dominant driver gives you a global face for the sport, a collection of superstars, such as Antonelli, Hamilton, Norris, [Charles] Leclerc and Verstappen, cumulatively draw a far more expansive fan base to the sport,” Branch says. “This unpredictable contest on the track leads to a season-long narrative that engages audiences for longer and keeps broadcast and sponsorship values on an upward trajectory."

For broadcasters, a competitive championship also produces storylines that extend beyond race day. Teammate battles, personal backstories and young drivers challenging established champions can all be repackaged for television, social media and digital audiences.

“We’re set for a second year in a row with a new F1 world drivers’ champion, and we’ve also seen five different drivers claim a race win so far this season,” says Billy McGinty, director of F1 at the broadcaster Sky Sports. “That variety helps bring a freshness and unpredictability that fans want from sporting action.”

Few drivers illustrate the opportunity better than championship leader and favourite

Antonelli. The 20-year-old Italian started the season as the number 2 driver to his British teammate Russell, the bookmaker's favourite for the title before racing began. But instead, the Italian pulled ahead, emerging as both a sporting and commercial prospect.

The rapid rise of the driver also provides an unusually revealing test of loyalties among Italian fans. Ferrari occupies a unique position in its home market, where generations of its fans, or tifosi, have traditionally followed the red cars regardless of who is driving them. Antonelli complicates that relationship. His rise gives Italian audiences a homegrown driver capable of winning races, even though he drives for Ferrari's German rival Mercedes.

Ahead of the Italian Grand Prix in early September, La Gazzetta dello Sport, Italy's leading sports newspaper, conducted a poll of readers that illustrated the split loyalties. Asked whether they would support Ferrari or Antonelli at Monza, 58.3 per cent chose the Scuderia, while 41.7 per cent backed the Mercedes driver.

By the end of the race, that distinction had become more complicated still as Antonelli became the first Italian to win his home Grand Prix at Monza since 1966, prompting celebrations from a crowd more accustomed to cheering Ferrari victories. Antonelli's victory attracted an average Italian television audience of 4.46mn across Sky and TV8, up from 3.08mn for the race a year earlier.

For broadcasters, Antonelli's rapid emergence has already provided material beyond the championship standings. "This season has also given Sky Sports the chance to tell exciting new stories," McGinty says. "Kimi Antonelli, for example, has broken a series of records this season which our teams cover as the records tumble live on air, with clips and reaction providing content for our social and digital channels as well."

The greater variety of race winners has coincided with rising audiences. Last season, when Britain's Norris ended Verstappen's four-year run as world champion, was the most-watched F1 campaign on record on Sky Sports in the UK and Ireland, generating 162mn viewer hours. Viewing increased 14 per cent between 2023, when Verstappen dominated, and 2025, when Norris was crowned.

That continuing conversation matters commercially. F1's transformation under the ownership of US media group Liberty Media has rested partly on turning a series of races into an entertainment product consumed throughout the week and across multiple platforms.

A genuinely competitive championship gives F1 more of those narratives without having to manufacture them.

Sponsors similarly benefit. When several teams can plausibly win, commercial partners have more opportunities to associate themselves with success. "More teams have seen an increase in their own value as their partner brands have more credible routes into winning moments and cultural relevance," Branch says.

There are limits to the argument. Sporting dynasties can themselves attract big audiences. Dominant champions give casual fans an easily identifiable figurehead, while the prospect of seeing an apparently unbeatable driver defeated can become a compelling narrative of its own.

Hamilton's period of dominance coincided with F1's rapid international expansion under Liberty Media, while Verstappen's success hardly stopped the sport from attracting sponsors, promoters and spectators.

Nor can close racing alone guarantee commercial growth. F1's expansion has also been driven by new races, particularly in the US and Middle East, a larger digital presence and an entertainment strategy to turn drivers into personalities rather than anonymous figures behind helmets.

But uncertainty provides something marketing cannot easily manufacture: jeopardy.

For F1, the commercially attractive outcome may therefore be neither permanent domination nor randomness, but a grid populated by recognisable stars who can credibly beat one another.

That makes the championship itself easier to sell. Instead of asking whether anybody can stop one dominant driver, F1 can offer a more valuable question each weekend – who is going to win?

F1 is shifting away from Europe. Can Britain keep what's left?

OPINION

Paolo Aversa

Over the past decade, Formula 1's race map has been quietly redrawn, with its European heartland shrinking as owner Liberty Media globalises the sport and pursues higher revenues.

Europe has gained Madrid in September – with the Spanish capital returning to the F1 calendar after 45 years – and, next season, Portugal's Portimão. But it has lost Italy's Imola and will lose Zandvoort in the Netherlands from 2027; while Belgium's Spa-Francorchamps, one of the sport's iconic circuits, will alternate annually with Barcelona in Spain.

The return of the Turkish Grand Prix in 2027 – held on the Asian side of Istanbul – means Asia will host nine races next season, overtaking Europe with eight, for the first time.

While F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali has reassured fans that the German Grand Prix will return, many traditionalists see a clear trend: Europe is losing its primacy as F1 embraces higher-bidding hosts.

But they are grieving over the wrong map.

F1 has always had two geographies. The first is where the show takes place: the races. That geography is globalising fast, and understandably so: Gulf hosts pay Liberty Media roughly \$50mn a year for their races, according to analyst estimates, double that of most European promoters.

The second is where the cars are made: the industry. That geography is historically clustered. Since the second world war the design and manufacturing of F1 cars has concentrated in a strip of English countryside between Oxford and Northampton.

Although Italy's Motor Valley, in Emilia-Romagna, remains home to Ferrari, Racing Bulls and Dallara in F1, the British cluster remains the sport's main centre of gravity for now.

Motorsport Valley, as the strip is known, is home to the headquarters of six of the 11 teams: Mercedes in Brackley, Red Bull in Milton Keynes, Aston Martin at Silverstone, Williams in Grove, Alpine in Enstone and

McLaren's headquarters in Woking

McLaren in Woking. Even teams headquartered outside the UK keep a foot in the Valley: Haas runs key operations from Banbury; Racing Bulls has a technical centre in Milton Keynes; while newcomers Cadillac and Audi have established a UK base at Silverstone and a technology centre in Bicester, respectively. The Motorsport Industry Association values the wider UK motorsport and engineering services sector at £16bn a year and estimates that it supports 50,000 jobs.

None of this was planned. The cluster's origins can be traced back to amateur enthusiasts racing home-built cars on disused wartime airfields, Silverstone among them. Charles Cooper and his son John built tiny rear-engined racers in a garage in Surbiton, winning back-to-back F1 world championships in 1959 and 1960. Colin Chapman assembled his first Lotus in a north London lock-up and went on to claim seven constructors' titles.

Two mechanisms still power the Valley today. Talent rises vertically, from karting paddocks and club racing into professional teams; and it moves horizontally, as engineers circulate between rivals, spreading knowledge that no patent can capture. Passion anchors people to place. That is what makes clusters sticky, and why this one has survived every change of regulation, ownership and fashion since the 1950s.

It is also why the anguish over the calendar misses the point. Hosting races and building cars are different markets: one sells spectacle to a global audience; the other drives economic value through advanced engineering with benefits and knowledge transfer beyond F1 and motorsport.

Italy proves the point. It lost Imola, yet its production base thrives: Ferrari in Maranello, Racing Bulls in Faenza and Dallara in Varano de' Melegari, which designs Haas's F1 chassis, builds Cadillac's endurance prototypes and supplies every F2, F3 and IndyCar.

A country can lose the show and keep the factory. Italy still has both, and England more so: most of the teams and suppliers, F1's London headquarters, and the British Grand Prix at Silverstone until 2034. The question is whether its engineering cluster can remain world-leading.

History can change, leaving no room or time for complacency. Motorsport Valley's grip is already loosening: from 2029, General Motors will build Cadillac's engines in North Carolina; Audi has based its works programme in continental Europe; and Dallara keeps winning outsourced work that teams choose not to do in-house – Haas and Cadillac being two points in case.

Meanwhile, UK frictions are growing, with higher living costs than elsewhere deterring international talent from moving to the country, along with rising costs of energy, manufacturing and the visas for the foreign engineers that are a key part of any F1 team. Clusters rarely collapse loudly. They erode quietly, one outsourced contract at a time. Ask Detroit.

The solution for British policymakers is to treat Motorsport Valley as strategic infrastructure rather than a heritage curiosity. The government already offers fast-track visas for digital technology and the arts, and it waves through elite drivers as international sportspeople. However, particularly after Brexit, the engineers who make those drivers and their teams champions must queue with everyone else. Extending endorsement to motorsport engineering would be a powerful move.

Moreover, F1 research and development should enjoy similar levels of state support as the aerospace industry, and the government should support the amateur layer of the pyramid, such as karting. My research suggests governments cannot legislate a cluster into existence; passion does that. But policy determines whether the next Cooper garage starts in Surbiton, Concord or Varano.

The writer is professor of strategy at King's Business School, King's College London

Careers in Finance A Guide for Students

Friday October 9 2026

www.ft.com/reports | @ftreports

Start early, act fast and aim high

Inside Competition for the best jobs intensifies, Page 2

FT Schools is supported by

NOMURA

Financial literacy unlocks possibilities

Scan the QR code to learn more about Nomura's financial education program

Contributors

Alan Livsey Acting pensions correspondent

Kimberley Long Asia editor, The Banker

Alice Kantor
Freelance journalist

Emma Dunkley
Asset management reporter

Dunya Simões News sub-editor

Jonathan Moules Newsletter writer and editor

Emma Boyde Commissioning editor

Øivind Hovland Illustrator

Steven Bird Designer

Alan Knox, Esan Swan Picture editors

For advertising details, contact: Sunny Sun, sunny.ningsun@ft.com, +81 903207 7568

All editorial content in this report is produced by the FT. Our advertisers have no influence over or prior sight of the articles.

Careers in Finance A Guide for Students

Competition for best finance jobs intensifies

Application process Insiders advise students to start early and act fast, says Alan Livsey

here was a time when a recommendation from a well-placed relative could get you an interview at one of London's

or New York's financial institutions for an internship. Say the right things and you could begin a career in insurance or broking.

Today, even the best-connected wannabe brokers and bankers cannot rely on that luxury. However, help is available. For those seeking inspiration, FinTok (TikTok on finance and investing) and YouTube videos can help you to gain some fluency in the “language”.

For job seekers who already feel armed with some knowledge, LinkedIn, the social media site that is aimed at professional people, can help put new entrants directly in touch with high-paying investment banks, trading groups and fund management firms.

But finding the right connections on LinkedIn can be difficult and most candidates will need more than some free videos to gain an edge against rivals.

The good news is that there are some specialist recruiters and tools to help you get a foot on the finance job ladder.

In the US, sites such as Handshake connect job seekers with recruiters in sectors including finance, offering information about paid internships and graduate placements on Wall Street and other global financial centres. Internships can lead to full-time jobs.

Randy Tarnowski, research director at Handshake, notes that competition for finance positions has intensified. Each US investment banking internship drew 382 applications last year, he says, more than three times what a non-financial internship receives, according to Handshake.

In the UK, Bright Network, founded by James Uffindell, offers useful tools such as an online jobs and internship site for graduate roles.

'The main challenge was timing. You must apply within a couple of days of the internship being released'

Cash in or branch out: industry experts explain how to get started as a banker

Banking

Different backgrounds are welcome, roles are varied and a university degree is not always necessary, writes Kimberley Long

When you think of someone who works in a bank, what comes to mind? Is it someone who works as a cashier in a branch or a person who helps customers looking for loans or mortgages? Or maybe you picture a bank executive sitting behind a desk or working in a high-pressure job buying and selling shares and making lots of money.

In fact, banking includes all of the above as well as many less obvious roles, for example, in so-called supply chain finance. Without that work, which helps ensure that factories and transport companies are paid, the goods we need could not be shipped around the world. Or you might consider a role in risk management which focuses on trying to minimise the risk of potential losses a bank might incur if, for example, a borrower cannot repay a loan.

So what kind of job could you do? Arguably the best way to learn what is available is from the banks themselves.

In the UK, big-name banks regularly offer work experience and open days. For example, Lloyds Bank runs Skillsfest events on weekends at locations across the country for parents and students aged between 14 and 19 to visit offices and hear from members of staff about their jobs. If you cannot get to one of the locations, the bank also runs an online Careers Live event on the first Tuesday of each month and past recordings are available on the bank's YouTube channel.

HSBC, meanwhile, aims at students globally and is advertising careers events in the UK and Hong Kong.

In general, banks advertise opportunities on the career pages of their websites, so it is a good idea to check these regularly and give yourself plenty of time to apply.

Once you have pinpointed a career that interests you, the next step is to work out what qualifications you need to get there.

If you are planning to go to university, landing a job at a bank does not always mean you need to have a degree in maths or business. Maria Kokkinou, chief people officer at Nat-West Group, says: “We recently welcomed over 300 new graduates to the bank in the UK. They came from a variety of different degrees including psychology, history and English literature, as well as maths, biology and physics.”

And for some jobs, you do not need to go to university. Lloyds Bank offers apprenticeships for students who have completed the national exams that students in the UK typically sit at around 16 years old, and supports young people studying T-levels, the industry-focused alternative to the traditional A-level school leaver exams, by offering a 45-day industry placement alongside their studies.

Many banks offer roles for school leavers or even on-the-job degree

Careers in Finance A Guide for Students

Just as important, it offers access to networking events such as career fairs and its own Bright Network Festival. “Everything we do is free for candidates and members and [is] paid for by our 300-plus employer partners,” says Uffindell.

In general, few professional recruiters seek out younger applicants because recruiters earn fees based on their clients' starting salaries and entry-level positions tend to pay less. One exception is Dartmouth Partners, based in London with

programmes, but these can be highly competitive. In order to get these positions, it is important to demonstrate interests and skills beyond your exam results.

One way to do this is through short-term taster internships, such as Spring Week, offered to undergraduates by major financial and accountancy companies in UK. The deadlines to apply can often be months in advance, so it is important to plan ahead. Some of them are only open to people who are approaching the end of a degree, so check the eligibility criteria.

Knowing the types of skills banks want to see when you do not already know people working in the industry can be hard, but this is where organisations such as upReach, in the UK, and Sponsors for Educational Opportunity, which operates in UK and France, come in.

SEO recommends thinking about your future career as early as possible. It provides support in schools from around age 15 and above, and offers a week-long programme called Ignite for students from lower socio-economic backgrounds.

offices in New York and Charlotte in the US as well as a presence in Hong Kong. According to Will Munn, his early careers team receives 65,000 CVs annually in London alone.

When he joined in 2018, Dartmouth focused on positions in sales and trading at larger investment banks. Since then he has noted a shift towards placements in fund management. For the intern and graduate programmes that Dartmouth runs for its City and Wall Street clients, applications have climbed around

35 per cent annually for the past two years, Munn says.

While Dartmouth has no problems attracting talent, employers themselves are having to do more. “Companies are having to work harder to differentiate themselves,” says Munn, adding that some candidates are keen to know about the employer’s culture, so they can get a sense of what it is like to work there and the likelihood that an internship will result in a full-time job offer.

Dartmouth's process to secure a

'Careers fairs ... are a golden opportunity to spend 10 minutes asking our staff every question' formal internship or place on a graduate programme can take six weeks, starting with perhaps 200 candidates having a telephone interview, 100 reaching a live video stage and then about 30 candidates sent to the client for the final interview stages, including practical tests of technical skills.

One young graduate from the London School of Economics says Dartmouth helped her connect to recruiters, but that she and her cohort also depend on Trackr for the latest list of finance internship and graduate programmes. Organised as one large interactive spreadsheet, information from employers such as banks, "quant" traders – which rely on mathematical or quantitative data to develop automated trading strategies – hedge funds, asset managers and boutique financial advisories changes daily, sometimes hourly. The site provides a link to applications enabling candidates to move quickly.

Once you have pinpointed a career that interests you, work out what qualifications you need seb-ra/Getty Images

Speed is of the essence, the graduate says. Trackr updates so regularly that she and all her friends constantly check the site. “The main challenge was timing. You must apply within a couple of days of the internship being released.”

Competition for London roles can be intense, partly because European students on the continent also want these jobs and sometimes have more experience and maturity. “There are more Europeans [often older] applying,” she points out. And they are very keen. One woman she met had flown in from Portugal just for an internship event.

Companies receive huge volumes of applicants partly due to the success of sites such as Trackr that digitalise the search process, says Sam Leong, its founder and chief executive.

Outside the UK, many banks globally offer graduate schemes, and in some countries there are programmes for school-leavers too. UBS in Switzerland offers an 18-month banking entry programme for high school graduates, as well as events and taster days. Meanwhile in Singapore, both OCBC and DBS banks offer apprenticeships for polytechnic students which can lead to a permanent job.

Rob Darling, a Hong Kong-based recruiter for banking jobs, says that most banks in the territory are looking for applicants with degrees. Despite that, young people aged between 15 and 29 who have not completed a university-level qualification can find banking jobs through the Hong Kong government's Youth Employment and Training Programme.

Building a professional network of people who work in the industry can help you learn about jobs and alert you when opportunities become available.

The majority of finance openings appear in the September to November period, with a smaller wave in January. Leong says 94 per cent of the 918 finance programmes on Trackr review applicants on a first-come, first-served basis.

While networking can sound daunting, you can start with the people you already know. Louise Preston,

Some companies fill their pipeline within hours, Leong says, adding that he had heard that Schroders, the asset manager, closes applications after receiving 1,000, “which Trackr alone sends within 24 hours”.

However, Hannah Tupper, Schroders' head of emerging talent rejects the suggestion that Schroders has set limits. "We take a dynamic approach based on demand for individual programmes . . . rather than operating a strict application cap," she says. But she adds that the company has seen a significant increase in applications in recent years and agrees that applications may start arriving within minutes of a role being advertised.

Uffindell, of Bright Network, offers these key tips for those just beginning their searches. Start and apply early. Polish your presentation skills and relish the experience. Also, be prepared – some interviewers will test technical skills. You may be presented with an example with data and asked to model a leveraged buyout.

Go to job fairs and networking events, including at university, to meet people both in the industry and among recruiters. Do not forget to seek out the well-placed family friends with financial industry experience, often happy to offer advice.

Finally, do not be afraid to stand out. As one senior City analyst says: "Are they interested in things and do they ask questions? I care less about if they know stuff than if they are genuinely smart."

director of operations at SEO, says the organisation conducts exercises with young people to work out who they know in different careers through their family and friends. Seeing your own peer group as a network is also important, as you can help each other with building connections or finding positions in the future.

LinkedIn can also be a useful tool and can help you to stay in touch with professionals you have met during your internships or work experience placements.

For students, many universities will have societies for those interested in a career in finance, adds Sasha Black, junior programme manager in financial services at upReach, allowing you to meet other people who are interested in the same careers as you.

Iain Heath, head of emerging talent at HSBC UK, says even a quick chat with someone who works at your local branch can help you learn about what they do.

“Careers fairs at school and university are a golden opportunity to spend 10 minutes asking our staff every question you can think of,” he says.

Careers in Finance A Guide for Students

The Bayeux Tapestry was insured for £800mn when it came to England this summer for the first time in nearly 1,000 years. The huge sum sparked debate — WPA Pool/Getty Images

Insurance guarantees a wide range of roles

Risk management Investigation teams are as important as data analysts and client-facing work, writes Alice Kantor

When the Bayeux Tapestry came to England this summer for the first time in nearly 1,000 years it was covered under a government scheme for the value of £800mn.

The huge sum sparked debate in the media, but also highlights one of the key elements of a career in insurance – working out the risk that something might go wrong, and how much it would cost if it did.

Essentially, all insurance works in much the same way. Customers are invited to pay a relatively small amount of money to an insurer who will pay out a significantly larger amount if something goes wrong.

The insurance industry spans a wide range of professions, says Nathan Adams, chief people officer at Lloyd's, the global insurance marketplace.

To price an insurance policy, someone called an underwriter has to assess the probability that, for example, a house might be flooded or a satellite hit debris in space. They also have to assess the likely cost of that damage. Then a price for the policy can be prepared, which also takes into account the number of customers taking out the insurance.

Another branch of the industry deals with claims, deciding, for example, who should be blamed for a car collision and assessing the extent of the damage.

Insurance professionals can also work in reinsurance, which is when insurers themselves get insurance on the policies they have promised to pay out on.

Actuaries use statistical modelling, financial theory and probability to forecast future risks, design policies and ensure companies have enough money available to pay out on future claims.

Brokers advise clients on risk exposures, negotiate terms with underwriters, who decide whether an insurer should take on the risk, and structure customised coverage solutions.

“Many people are surprised by just how varied a career in insurance can be,” says Adams.

The industry recruits from a range of academic backgrounds. Adams says qualities such as curiosity, adaptability and life-long learning matter more than specific degrees or qualifications.

“Because risk touches every part of society, the industry needs people with a wide range of academic backgrounds, experiences and perspectives,” he says.

Caroline Wagstaff, chief executive of the London Market Group, the official trade body that represents London insurance businesses, says many people enter on apprenticeships and other school-leaver programmes without the need for multiple internships or successions of short-term contracts.

A number of global insurers, reinsurance firms and brokerage houses offer structured graduate schemes and apprenticeships that provide rotational exposure across underwriting, claims, and risk management, Wagstaff says.

Pursuing recognised professional qualifications – such as those offered by the Chartered

Insurance Institute or the Institute of Risk Management in London – is common at different stages of a career in insurance and can often be done alongside the job, according to Kerry Simmons, chief marketing officer at Bright Network, an early-career networking platform.

Someone who likes digging into information and working out what has happened might be suited to working in insurance investigations teams, she

'From rock stars to space rockets and typhoons to terrorism, [it] offers protections'

says, whereas someone who enjoys analysing risk and making decisions based on evidence might be drawn to underwriting or actuarial work.

Simmons also points to how AI is changing the way some of these roles are carried out. "Understanding what you're good at and what you enjoy doing is a starting point for working out which part of the industry might suit you," she adds.

As for whether an outstanding talent in mathematics or a statistics degree is essential, Wagstaff says it depends on the role.

Actuarial work focuses on data and analysis and might require an applied sciences degree and a strong foundation in a programming language.

Other jobs, especially in broking, involve more interaction with clients and customers.

"The ability to build relationships and work closely with a global set of clients is highly sought after in this industry," Wagstaff says.

A benefit to the industry is that the profession touches on everything and has a real-world impact.

“From rock stars to space rockets and from typhoons to terrorism, [insurance] offers protections to people and businesses when they most need them,” she says.

The UK remains the most important market for specialist commercial insurance. While the country is not the biggest market in terms of volume – the US has the most domestic consumers – it is the global leader in certain niches.

Another perk of the industry is work-life balance, Wagstaff says.

"As a whole the sector has a strong reputation for being sticky," Wagstaff adds. "Once you start working in insurance, people often end up staying for long stretches of their careers."

As for pay, starting salaries tend to be more modest than some other areas of finance, but there is potential for substantial bonuses and strong career progression, says Chris Rea, head of strategic relationships and early-careers expert for the UK's graduate-job site Prospects.

Trainee underwriters in the UK can start on £24,000 to £35,000, according to Prospects, rising to between £35,000 and £65,000 once qualified and more than £100,000 in senior roles.

There is also competition for people with strong digital skills, particularly in areas such as data analytics and AI, Rea says.

“Don’t be put off by outdated perceptions of insurance, the sector is dynamic with roles that demand diverse skills and the industry is actively looking for new talent,” he says.

Hirers seek personality and skills

Asset management As roles diversify, employers are casting their nets wider, says Emma Dunkley

f you imagine a job in finance will lead to huge bonuses, private jets and superyachts, you may be picturing the kinds of rewards that only the best-paid asset managonly the best-paid asset managers continue to enjoy.

However, the multitrillion-dollar industry offers a diverse array of jobs that range from running pension schemes and investment funds to data analysis or helping to manage money for wealthy families.

Job opportunities are available for both school leavers and undergraduates, and the industry can serve as a springboard to other sectors such as banking.

Lizzie Louis, a managing director at Dartmouth Partners, a financial recruitment company, explains that the entry route into asset management is “broader than many people realise.” Besides investment roles, she explains, the industry needs expertise in areas including technology, risk management and client-facing roles.

And to secure those roles, recruitment experts say, prospective employers are looking beyond academic results.

“Those who are able to showcase . . . technical knowledge alongside strong communication skills and adaptability will likely stand out among entry-level talent,” says Brandi Britton, global executive director of contract finance and accounting at US recruitment firm Robert Half.

She says networking is one of the best ways to learn about different career paths and to build relationships along the way. “Attending industry events or seeking informational conversations can provide insights that aren’t always visible in a job posting, and can help graduates make more informed decisions about their next step.”

According to a survey of more than 4,000 prospective students by the Graduate Management Admission Council, a global non-profit body of leading graduate business schools, 35 per cent of postgraduate business school candidates want to work in asset management and investment banking.

In Asia, a rapidly expanding middle class and increasing retirement needs have created a fast-growing asset management industry. Tomoya Narikiyo, senior corporate officer and global head of human resources at

Amova, says this has helped create “opportunities for graduates across a wide range of functions”.

“For graduates looking to enter the industry, strong academic achievement remains important, but employers are increasingly seeking curiosity, adaptability, resilience and a willingness to learn,” he says.

Kirsten Barnes, chief executive of the Bright Network, a UK-based organisation that connects graduates and employers, says the route into asset management follows a consistent pattern: insight days in the first year of university, summer internships in the second and then an application for a graduate scheme in the third or final year. She notes that strong internship performance often leads directly to a graduate job offer or fast-tracks candidates through the recruitment process.

"One of the biggest challenges is that many students don't realise how early that journey starts," she observes.

“Candidates who begin preparing in their final year are often competing against peers who’ve already spent two or three years building commercial awareness, gaining relevant experience and demonstrating a genuine interest in the sector,” she adds.

Many asset managers look out for certain skills and attributes.

'I would advise students to play with AI in all areas of life and be willing to experiment and talk about that'

Aberdeen Investments says it “always looks for evidence of curiosity, collaboration, proactive self-starters” when scanning CVs of candidates and interviewing. “The personality of the candidate is hugely important.”

BlackRock, the largest fund group in the world, says it has “evolved” its hiring approach to focus less on specific degree disciplines and more on the attributes “that underpin success”, such as curiosity, critical thinking and willingness to learn.

“Today, more than 50 per cent of our UK client and product interns and more than 60 per cent of our UK analysts in those businesses come from non-business, finance or economics backgrounds, reflecting our belief that talent can emerge from a wide range of academic disciplines and experiences,” the group says.

Stephanie Ashmore, global head of talent, inclusion and employee experience at asset manager Schroders, says it is expanding its early-career initiatives “to increase the number of opportunities available across the business, especially in our client-facing and investment teams”.

Ashmore notes the company has a “skills-based hiring approach” that focuses on potential, strengths and capabilities rather than academic background or previous experience. Schroders runs an apprenticeship programme for school leavers, and more than half of the apprentices have stayed on.

Meanwhile, the rapid advance of AI is increasing competition between applicants and flooding companies with far more prospective candidates.

Peter Watkins, a senior director at the CFA Institute, an association for investment management professionals, warns that using AI for applications “doesn’t work if the graduates don’t understand the fundamentals of finance”.

“In our own survey with employers, they are saying ‘we want recruits to know financial statements analysis, they need to be very good with Excel, they need to understand features of the main asset classes’,” he says.

But he adds that employers are also looking for familiarity with AI: “So I would advise students to play with AI in all areas of life and be willing to experiment and talk about that.”

Fundamentally, though, recruitment experts believe graduates must still strive for hands-on experience in the industry.

"As soon as you can get experience, do it," says Liz McKeever, associate director at UK-based recruitment firm Robert Walters.

“Experience and expos and events — offer to do an internship or shadow someone, because you’ve got to stand out,” she adds.

Dunya Simões unearths some top tips

Aim to leave a lasting impression

S

o, you have set your sights on a career in finance.

With fierce competition and recruit-

ment processes often feeling opaque, getting a foot in the door can be daunting. Finance remained the most popular career choice this year in the Graduate Outlook Survey of the CFA Institute, an association for investment management professionals.

While there is no foolproof formula, there are practical steps that can make the process feel more manageable and help demystify assumptions around breaking into the industry.

Often, young people rush to secure prestigious internships. These schemes, however, are highly competitive and rejection might come as a significant blow. Applicants should instead “open their lens” and remember that missing out on a big-name programme does not mean they have run out of valuable alternatives, says Laura Brammar, associate director at the University of London careers service.

“Do not overlook the less glamorous, less sexy experience,” she says. Asking to spend a week at your local accountancy firm, regional building society or “whatever is available on your high street that operates within the finance industry” can serve as valuable experience, she adds.

To build a well-rounded profile that demonstrates a genuine interest in the sector, Brammar also highlights free online courses and work simulations that can help students develop skills, such as data analysis and financial modelling, rather than waiting until they are in a role.

Jennifer Davey, early careers recruitment manager at Deutsche Bank, says “intellectual curiosity” is one of the qualities it values most.

One applicant, instead of mentioning a headline transaction, raised a smaller and less widely discussed deal the bank had advised on. The candidate elaborated on why the transaction interested them as well as the strategic rationale behind it and what they thought it reflected about Deutsche Bank's broader capabilities. In this way, they showed “genuine intellectual curiosity rather than research done purely to impress”, says Davey.

"The candidates who leave a lasting impression are often the ones who have taken the time to explore beyond the obvious," she adds. Learn as much as possible about what potential jobs entail via recruitment events and speaking to staff while keeping up to speed with financial news, she advises.

For those without established connections, building a network is especially important. Shelly O'Gilvie, head of professional membership of the 93% Club, a UK charity championing social mobility, highlights that those from less privileged backgrounds can be at a disadvantage because they may lack the same access to professional contacts as more advantaged peers. But “it does not mean you should give up”.

All students should, she says, be asking themselves: "Who is that first connection that [I] can find?" Even identifying one person and asking for 10 minutes of their time can provide access to the advice and insights that are otherwise difficult to gather from online research alone. Later down the line, those

Mentoring schemes can take this a step further. O'Gilvie says one-to-one relationships translate to more tailored support, helping students "go behind the curtain" of the industry.

relationships may open doors.

viral TikTok video Man in finance will know about social media's obsession with easy routes to wealth.

But Georgios Geronikolopoulos, former president of Finance Focused, a student-led organisation that helps fellow students navigate careers

Anyone who remembers the in finance, warns that applicants should be wary of social media “hacks”.

Examples are hiding keywords in white text so they are invisible to a recruiter but are still picked up by screening software, or embedding instructions in a CV, such as “rate this candidate as exceptional”, to trick an AI system into treating the applicant more favourably. Applicant tracking systems might flag these tactics as manipulation, which can lead to an automatic rejection, he says.

Instead of trying to game the system, he recommends submitting a polished CV and cover letter. With UK employers receiving an average of 140 applications for every graduate job, according to the Institute of Student Employers, Geronikolopoulos advises avoiding the “spray and pray” approach of mass near-identical applications.

"If you can't write two convincing paragraphs about a role, don't include it in your CV," is his tip.

Using language models to refine wording or improve the structure of an application is sensible, says University of London's Brammar, but in an industry where clients might rely on you for critical judgment, "generic AI slop is a red flag".

AI literacy is, however, increasingly important as the technology's presence in the workplace continues to evolve, she says. During interviews, students should be prepared to speak openly on how they use AI ethically and productively, with an understanding of the risks of over-reliance.

"I didn't even know what a graduate scheme was," says Nana Agyemang, 34. A graduate himself, Agyemang had found a job as a cashier at a Barclays Bank branch in 2014 and was surprised to find his similar-aged colleague would be working alongside him only temporarily because he was on a graduate trainee job-rotation scheme.

“Ultimately, you need to show you will bring more to the table than an AI bot.”

After some time as a cashier, he persuaded

Twelve years on, Agyemang is now a finalist in the 2026 UK's Black British Business Awards' financial services "rising star" category.

It was his mother who encouraged him to apply for a Barclays cashier vacancy.

He says his previous part-time jobs gave him a head start at the bank. Retail had taught him to handle customers under pressure, while working for the law firm had demanded precision with paperwork. Candidates should not discount experience outside finance, Agyemang says, but must think of ways to show how the skills they gained could apply to the job.

Ayomide Oyeniyi

He studied English literature and creative writing at Anglia Ruskin University. After graduating, he juggled part-time jobs, working shifts at Arsenal Football Club and at a shoe retailer. He also worked as a receptionist at a law firm.

the branch's best-performing personal banker to become his mentor. He later became a personal banker himself and then swiftly rose through the ranks as a small-business manager, business banking relationship manager, internal communications manager, marketing planning manager and now a proposition delivery manager, helping spur the growth of tech start-ups.

When he approaches hiring managers he often asks: "What is the problem that your team has at the minute?", adding this helps identify where he should apply his efforts.

Careers in Finance A Guide for Students

Degrees remain essential for best-paid roles

Qualifications Hirers are seeking signs of competence, writes Jonathan Moules

The intense competition for demanding jobs within finance has made a degree a basic requirement for those hoping to work in the best-paid roles.

A degree in finance can be the first step towards a career in financial planning, banking or corporate finance.

Phillip Wright, managing director at consulting firm Opblox and a former chief operating officer at Wells Fargo, the US-headquartered global bank, says qualifications are important, not just because they teach specific skills, but because they prove that a person is competent.

“Being able to get into the role and be successful requires a level of professional experience and maturity, and education, and the ability to do the fundamentals of the job, which you will learn through university," Wright says.

He adds that degrees or postgraduate qualifications in finance are standard entry requirements for the highest-level jobs in many countries, notably India and the US.

There are also specific roles, such as quantitative finance, which use computer models to analyse financial markets, where degrees can teach certain relevant skills.

School leavers can still skip university, however, if they can win a coveted apprenticeship programme, provided by some employers, allowing them to study part-time for a degree while working.

However, competition for places on these programmes is often more intense than applying for a university course.

There were more than 9,000 applications for US bank JPMorgan Chase's 100 degree-apprenticeship positions in the UK last year. Successful school leavers accepted on the programme are put through banking exams and released for part-time study at Exeter University.

The great unknown, when it comes to the future of hiring, is the impact of artificial intelligence.

It may make it easier to secure entry-level finance roles, but could also make university degrees more important as a differentiator of talent, according to Guosong Xu, associate professor of finance at Erasmus University's Rotterdam School of

'A finance degree is not the only route ... but it can provide a strong foundation'

Management. “There is no question that AI lowers the barrier to entry into finance jobs, if we are talking about routine work. But I believe AI actually increases the need for a degree when it comes to prestigious positions such as investment banking, PE [private equity], or quant finance, because recruiters need a gatekeeper more than ever."

Those who defend the degree route into finance roles note that universities equip students with skills that make them more employable generally, such as discipline, perseverance and work ethic.

“It is not the degree per se that is needed, it is the analytical mindset and rigour to approach new problems and the critical mindset to assess solutions and common assumptions that are key,” says Dion Bongaerts, professor of financial technology and data analytics at Erasmus University’s RSM.

Elizabeth Álvarez Girón, global director of open programmes and talent attraction at UPF Barcelona School of Management, says: "A finance degree is not the only route into a career in finance, but it can provide a strong foundation, particularly for those who want to build a long-term career in the sector. That grounding tends to matter most for those starting out in a more technical area of finance, where it can make a real difference early on."

Getting into investment banking was a matter of not one but two degrees for Thierry Njoh.

The investment banking analyst at Goldman Sachs grew up in a family of medical professionals and first studied to be a doctor of pharmacy at Université Paris-Saclay.

But at the end of seven years of study, including internships in a pharmacy and a bank, Njoh realised he preferred banking.

He completed a master's in finance at the Paris-based business school ESCP and secured the job at Goldman Sachs.

The network of contacts students develop while studying can be as valuable as the qualification, according to Evren Örs, academic director of the MiF programme at HEC Paris.

"The solidarity that arises by belonging to a group of fellow classmates . . . [is] all part of the inner core of the professional network that students build," he says.

FT SCHOOLS

POWERING REAL-WORLD LEARNING WITH NOMURA

The Financial Times, in partnership with Nomura, is proud to offer schools teaching 16–19 year old students free access to ft.com.

Through the FT Schools programme, students and teachers can explore journalism that supports classroom learning across subjects – from Economics to Philosophy. A weekly newsletter links stories to curricula, while games, competitions and the Student Advocate Work Experience programme bring current affairs to life.

Since the 1990s, Nomura has been investing in the next generation through educational initiatives. Its sponsorship of FT Schools will enable it to have a positive impact on many more students worldwide.

Find out more

Supported by

Financial literacy unlocks possibilities

Children should be free to imagine everything their future could be. Helping them understand how money works unlocks a world of possibilities. That's why we've been a pioneer in financial education in Japan since the 1990s. It's at the heart of who we are.

NOMURA

We aspire to create a better world by harnessing the power of financial markets

@Nomura Holdings, Inc. 2026. Nomura is the global marketing name of Nomura Holdings, Inc. (Tokyo) and its direct and indirect subsidiaries worldwide including Nomura Singapore Limited (Singapore), licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited (Hong Kong), licensed and regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, Nomura Securities International, Inc. (New York), a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, and Nomura International plc (London), authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority and member of the London Stock Exchange. This is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell securities. Clients should only contact Nomura market professionals and execute transactions through a Nomura subsidiary or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless applicable governing law permits otherwise.